Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
), Guimares, 2001
1003
Sandra Ferreira
Tecnasol FGE Fundaes e Geotecnia S.A., R. das Fontainhas n 58, 2700 391, Amadora, Portugal
Vasco Barros
Tecnasol FGE Fundaes e Geotecnia S.A., R. das Fontainhas n 58, 2700 391, Amadora, Portugal
ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to present the main design and construction criteria considered on some underpinning solutions performed by Tecnasol FGE. After a brief description of
micropiling and jet grouting underpinning techniques, some practical case histories where these
techniques were adopted are presented. Finally the main advantages and limitations of the presented techniques are pointed out.
1 INTRODUCTION
The development of new underpinning techniques has allowed the adoption of a wide number of
solutions, progressively more adapted to the singularities and restraints of each scenario, specially when sensitive, old or historic, constructions founded on weak soils have to be underpinned.
In this context, the solutions comprising micropiling and jet grouting techniques should be pointed
out due to their versatility and advantages related to the limitation of vibrations, as well as the
possibility to be adopted in small spaces with low head rooms and restricted access. These techniques also allow the soil improvement, minimising the soil disturbance due to the boreholes small
diameter, drilled with suitable equipment (Bullivant and Bradbury 1996).
On the following chapters, after the presentation of the main aspects of these two techniques,
some practical case histories, where micropiling and jet grouting underpinning techniques were
used, are presented. In each case, the following topics are presented: scenario, main restraints,
main conception and execution criteria.
2 UNDERPINNING TECHNIQUES
2.1 Micropiling
Micropiling is a very old technique initially adopted with wood driven piles, which has been developed in the last years mainly due to the bearing capacity improvement (lateral friction at the
bond length) related with the use of high pressure grout injection techniques (bigger than 4MPa)
and high resistance steel hollow tubes (see Fig. 1). These improvements have allowed to design
micropiles with steel hollow tubes (external diameter lesser than 130mm) to carry axial service
loads greater than 700kN (Bustamante et al. 1997, Bustamante and Doix 1985).
2.2 Jet Grouting
Jet grouting technology have initially been developed in Japan, the UK and Italy. For about 20
years it has been applied worldwide. In Portugal the technology has been applied in the last 6
years, mainly on Lisbon Metro extension works. Recently, vertical jet grouting solutions have
1004
Historical Constructions
also become competitive and advisable in several and more usual scenarios, like foundations,
earth retaining and underpinning works (Falco et al. 2000, Greenwood 1987).
According to the definitions of the European Standard on Jet Grouting (CEN/TC 288), jet
grouted structures consist of interlocking jet grouted elements. An element is the volume of soil
treated through a single borehole, which may be a cylindrical jet grouted column or a planar jet
grouted panel (Kutzner 1996).
Jet grouting has nothing to do with common grouting, as according to the jet grouting technique the soil is disintegrated by a jet of water or grout at very high pressure (bigger than
30MPa), obtained through the transformation of the high pressure flow (potential energy) into the
high speed jet directed to the soil (kinetic energy) due to the very small diameter nozzles effect,
and is subsequently mixed with the grouting material (see Fig. 2). A part of the mixed material
returns to the surface along annular space around the drill rods or along neighbouring boreholes,
serving for necessary pressure relief.
hMicropiling technology
2nd Phase
3rd Phase
4th Phase
LS
Steel hollow
tubes
Thread connectors
Micropiles
Manchette valves
Drilling the
borehole with
small
diameter rod
till the
micropile
base
Placement of
the steel hollow
tube inside the
borehole and
filling of the
tube/soil
annular space
with grout
Post-grouting
high pressure
injection through
manchette
valves in order
to create the
bond length (Ls)
Filling of the
internal space
of the steel
hollow tube
with grout
High pressure
jetting nozzle
(water test)
Drilling the
borehole with
small
diameter rod
2nd Phase
Conclusion of
the drilling
operation when
the rods jet
nozzle reaches
the base of the
column
3rd Phase
Drawing up and
rotation of the
rod together
with the jetting
of grout at very
high pressure
through rods
nozzle
4th Phase
1005
h Localization Plan
N
Adjacent old
building with
3 floors
External
excavation
Faades to be
perservered
Free ground
Internal
excavation
D. Pedro V Street
Figure 3: Site localization and view of the existent faades at the beginning of the works.
D. Pedro V Street
Landfill
-6m
D. Pedro V Street
External
excavation
Internal
excavation
Landfill
-6m
Tie rod
Miocenic
clays
Ground anchors
Miocenic
clays
Micropiles
D. Pedro V Street
External
excavation
Internal
excavation
Landfill
-6m
External
excavation
Internal
excavation
Landfill
-6m
Tie rod
Miocenic
clays
Ground anchors
Miocenic
clays
1006
Historical Constructions
Existent
columns
(to be
replaced)
New
columns
Main entrance
Internal
excavation
Existent columns
Main Square
Landfill
Landfill
-2m
-2m
G.W.
G.W.
Cobble
Cobble
Landfill
-2m
G.W.
Cobble
Landfill
-2m
G.W.
Cobble
1007
Jet grouting
underpinning
columns
New reinforced
concrete columns
hLocalization Plan
Chimney to be perservered)
Peripherical
diaphragm wall
0m
G.W.
Ceuta Av.
Fo
nta
inh
as
Str
ee
t
-3m
7m depth
excavation
1
Chimney to be
underpinned
+30m
1
F. Silveira Street
Internal
excavation
-7m
Alluvium
-17m
Volcanic Complex
1008
Historical Constructions
hUnderpinning solution
Micropiles
Tie rod
Tie rod
Level 1
Tie rod level 2 and 3 - Plan
Level 4
Cap beam
View
Target 10
Target 8
Target 6
54
50
46
42
38
34
30
26
22
18
14
10
6
2
-2
-6
26m
T10
21m
T8
18m
18-Set-00
9-Out-00
Dz[mm]
Time
T6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
7m
Dy[mm]
18-Set-00
9-Out-00
Dy[mm]
Chimney
D z[mm]
Time
Chimney
Figure 11: Excavation works and perspective of the chimney at the end of the works.
1009
Figure 12: Palace localization and view from Palmeiras Square at the beginning of the XXth century.
Drilling operation
Load transference
Underpinned wall
Underpinning
micropiles
Cap beam
Prestressed
cables
Micropiles
Gewi
1010
Historical Constructions
The underpinning of external walls was done with a contiguous bored piles (0,80m spaced
1,0m) wall, connected to the masonry walls trough the piles cap beam. The piles were lined with
sprayed concrete. Due to Palace geometry and the existence of the internal micropiles, the piles
were braced at 6 levels by concrete ring beams. These beams were cast against the ground and
their levels were defined in order to coincide with the final underground slabs. The beams were
supported by vertical steel profiles in order to restrain their deformation (see Fig. 14).
Ring
prestressed
concrete
beams
Fontes
Pereira de
Melo Av.
Sousa Martins
Street
(EAST )
(WEST )
Palace
Landfill
Miocenic soils
-24m
G.W.
G.W.
Oligocnico
Prestressed cables
layout
Before excavation
After excavation
May 2000
March
Dezember
Vista da 2000
cortina de estacas e das vigas
de2001
cintagem
August 2000
June 2000
April 2001
Figure 15: Sequences of excavation and construction of the underground slabs around the Palace.
The Palace performance was analysed through a wide Monitoring and Survey Plan, comprising: topographic marks (reflective targets) and inclinometers (located inside the bored piles). Data
was collected at least once a week (see Fig. 16).
DX
[x10-3m]
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
Alvo 5
Andalu
z Squa
re
99
Str
eet
DY
[x10-3m]
eiras
Palm
re
Squa
99
4-Jan00
99
Inclinometers
(inside piles)
00
Alvo 7
A6
00
Alvo 8
A7
A8
1-Abr-
23-Abr-
15-Mai-
6-Jun-
28-Jun-
00
00
00
00
00
1-Abr-
23-Abr-
15-Mai-
6-Jun-
28-Jun-
20-Jul-
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Time
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
21-Nov- 13-Dez- 4-Jan-
DZ
[x10-3m]
Alvo 6
A5
21-Nov- 13-Dez-
Ma
rten
s F
err
o
Str
A5
eet
A6
A7
Y
X
A8
Sou
sa
Ma
rtin
s
Fon
tes
Per
eira
Lis
de
bon
Me
lo
Me
tro
Tun
nel
Ave
nue
99
00
00
00
11-Ago- 2-Set-00
00
Time
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
21-Nov- 13-Dez99
99
4-Jan00
1-Abr00
23-Abr- 15-Mai00
00
6-Jun00
Time
1011
General view of the excavation around the Palace (final phase - Dez 2000)
Figure 17: Final phases of excavation and construction of underground slabs around the Palace.
7 MAIN CONCLUSIONS
The demand for underpinning has increased steadily in the last years as renewals and refurbishment works have gained popularity. As example, the presented cases proved how the versatility of
some underpinning techniques can fit the uniqueness and restraints of complex scenarios, involving old and historic sensitive buildings, sometimes founded on weak soils. On the figures below
two comparative analyses between micropiling and jet grouting technologies (see Fig. 18) and between these techniques and the conventional ones are presented (see Fig. 19).
Micropiling vs Jet Grouting columns
Jet grouting
Micropiling
Main advantages
Main restraints
Main restraints
4 Mobilization of lateral friction
only on competent soils
(NSPT >40 )
0,5m
1000
0,8m
Weak ground
Jet Grouting type 1
7,5
10,0
Micropiles
12,5
Depth [m]
4 Water tightness
500
5,0
250
2,5
Main advantages
Foundation ground
15,0
Figure 18: Comparative analysis between micropiling and jet grouting underpinning techniques.
h Underpinning techniques solutions
Micropiling, Jet Grouting
Main advantages
Other conventional
solutions (ex: pits)
4 Easier construction
control of the underpinning elements
4 Solutions depending on
technology (specialist underpinners): shorter works schedule
Main estraints
Existent foundation
Main advantages
4 Improvemente of soil
characteristics, including water
tightness (jet grouting)
Existent wall
Main restraints
4 Solutions depending
on workmanship
4 Bigger soil
disturbance
4 More risk and longer
works schedule
New foundation
Pit
Pit solution
Plan
Figure 19: Comparative analysis between micropiling/jet grouting and conventional techniques.
1012
Historical Constructions
In this context, it is also important to point out that underpinning works requires expertise at
the design and execution levels, along with safe working practices, specially when the underpinned building has an old structure and a special architectural/historical interest and therefore is
protected from demolition or alteration. In these situations, considerable care is required on previous tasks, as for example: monitoring and survey, geological and geotechnical site investigation,
stiffen, grout, shore struct, in order to prepare these old buildings and their original foundations
for the underpinning works. As example, some of the presented cases proved how important is the
role of the Monitoring and Survey Plan in this kind of works, mainly as a risk management tool,
allowing to survey and predict the performance of the underpinned structures and, if necessary, to
adjust in time the initial solution.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the Owners of the presented underpinned structures for his permission
to the presentation of this paper. The authors must also point out that the presented works were
performed by a Tecnasol FGE multitask team, involving experts from different areas, ranging
from structural and geotechnical design to geological investigation, commercial, monitoring/survey and site management teams.
REFERENCES
Bullivant, R. A. and Bradbury, H. W. 1996. Underpinning A practical guide. Oxford, Blackwell Science.
Bustamante, M. and Doix, B. 1985. Une mthode pour le calcul des tirants et des micropieux injects (in
french). Bull. Liasion Labo. P. et Ch., n140, p.75-92.
Bustamante, M. et al. 1997. Underpinning of the Bordeaux Pont-de-Pierre: A First Empire masonry.
Geotechnical Engineering for the Preservation of Monuments and Historic Sites, p. 551-559. Rotterdam, Balkema,.
Falco, J. et al. 2000. Case histories and work performance of vertical jet grouting solutions. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ground Improvment, Geosystems, Helsinki, Finland,
June 7-9, 2000, p. 165-171. Building Information Ltd.
Greenwood, D. 1987. Underpinning by grouting. Ground Engineering, April 1987.
Kutzner, C. 1996. Grouting of Rock and Soil. Rotterdam, Balkema.
Pinto, A. et al. 2000. Casos Prticos de Solues de Reforo de Fundaes (in portuguese). Proceedings
do 7 Congresso Nacional de Geotecnia Vol 2/3, Porto, Portugal, April, 2000, p.1055-1063.