In this report I will be discussing the issues within factual TV
programmes, the issues being things such as: accuracy, balance, impartiality, objectivity, subjectivity, representation, opinion and bias. I watched a selection of TV programmes such as: Benefits Street, Question Time, News Night, Johns Not Mad, Louis Theroux and Panorama. These programmes include some of the issues that I will now discuss. The first issue is accuracy. Accuracy is being factual or truthful about a subject. An example of this is a documentary called Johns Not Mad. Johns not mad is a BBC documentary from 1989 which shadows a 15 year old boy with Tourettes. This gives examples of accuracy as in the show experts are used to give facts about the illness. Oliver Sacks, a neurologist, offers observations on aspects of John's behavior. Another way accuracy is used is by interviewing his mother. This is accuracy as it truthful as its coming from someone who has been with John through his whole life so far and struggled with the illness with him, using his mum is good as it will make the audience believe what is being said more. The second issue is balance. Balance is having a balanced opinion on a subject. There are always two sides to a story and the information told to the viewers should be correct, fair and equal. It is important to keep a balance on views and investigate to find information for both sides of the story. Ensuring that both sides of an argument are shown in a factual TV programme is vital as it prevents a certain opinion being shown to a viewer, making them believe what theyre told without knowing all the facts from both sides. The third issue is impartiality. Impartiality is weighing both views equally, taking no side. An example of this is Question Time. Question Time is a topical debate television programme aired on BBC. The show typically features politicians from at least the three major political parties as well as other public figures who answer pre-selected questions put to them by an audience selected on the basis of its political views and demographic. In this the host David Dimbleby, is impartial as he stands and listens to both sides without taking any side of the debate. This is important as if the host was to take a side it would then become unequal. The next issue is objectivity. Objectivity is unbiased opinion based on facts. An example of this is the Newnight episode which was based on Benefits street. Newsnight is a weekday BBC Television current affairs programme which specialises in analysis and often
robust cross-examination of senior politicians. In this episode
Channel 4 Head of Factual Programmes Ralph Lee debates the merits of the controversial documentary series 'Benefits Street' with 'Chavs' author Owen Jones and Spectator editor Fraser Nelson. This is objectivity as Ralph challenges both sides of the debate with facts but she is not biased as she doesnt choose a side and remains objective. She gives facts from the show to back up her questions but without siding to any side of the debate. Another issue is subjectivity. Subjectivity is opinions that arent based on facts. Factual TV programmes are usually based on facts so subjectivity is usually avoided during factual TV programming as this can prevent the facts being used and may result in the programme being slightly biased towards your views. Some presenters may use it to help manipulate an audience into seconding their opinion. It is okay to state your opinion on a debate but its important you mention its your opinion and that your opinion isnt necessarily the opinion of anyone else, this will prevent the viewers from thinking you will be biased towards your beliefs. The next issue is representation. Representation is the action of speaking or acting on behalf of someone else. An example of this is the episode of Panorama- Inside North Korea. Panorama is a BBC Television current affairs documentary programme. First broadcast in 1953, it is the world's longest-running current affairs television programme. The BBC reporter Rupert Wingfield-Hayes investigates the apparent upturn in the North Korean economy and asks if the signs of improvement in the capital Pyongyang are real. This is a good example as in this episode we never actually get to view the leader, Kim Jong Un. Everything that is said to Rupert is just simply passed on from the leader to the people working for him which is then spoken to Rupert and the team. We have no idea what is true or not as we are hearing it second person and not from Kim Jon Un himself. The second to last issue is opinion. Opinion is a view or judgement formed about something not based on facts. An example of this is Louis Theroux The Most Hated Family In America. The Most Hated Family in America is a 2007 BBC documentary film written and presented by Louis Theroux about the family at the core of the Westboro Baptist Church. The organization was led by Fred Phelps and located in Topeka, Kansas. In this we are shown opinions from both side, which are very different. Firstly, we are shown all of the families opinions and all the things they do on a normal day which some people would be very opinionated about, which at the end Louis comes clean with what he thinks. This isnt based on facts because itss simply just what Louis thinks and believes himself which he shares with the family who also have different views.
The last issue is biased. Biased is unfairly prejudiced for or against
someone or something. An example of this is Benefits street. Benefits Street is a British documentary series broadcast on Channel 4. The show was filmed by documenting the lives of several residents of James Turner Street, Birmingham. It shows benefits claimants committing crimes and lack the motivation to seek employment. In this programme we are shown all bad things about the people living on the street. We are shown how they are all unemployed and arent trying to make a living.