Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
poultry farming
165
166
farming
ry
ed
nd
of
a)
e
might
be
1. Distance to nearest
off site dwellinghouse
2. Distance to
nearest sensitive
area (refer to Policy
2.3)
3. Distance to road
4. Distance to any
boundary
metres
100
200
300
400
metres
100
200
300
400
metres
100
100
100
100
metres
50
50
50
50
issues;
de
details of contingency plans, describing
and to the Department of Primary Industries (Victo
actions, allocating responsibilities, and ria)
Generic EMP, and the UK Environmental Agency
providing contact details for any outsid
Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC)
guides for greater detail than is set out above (not
advice, notification or assistance that
e
that not all information or requirements set out in
be required;
these references are applicable in Taranaki).
details of any self-monitoring that will
Operators should seek to ensure that they incorpor
carried out, including property boundar ate
odour surveys;
familiarisation of all staff with consent s
conditions and the contents of the EMP
es;
Buffer distances
Preferred minimum buffer distances between shed
as a
of any
The Taranaki Regional Council will have regard to th buffer distances in determining whether notification
ese
of
resource consent applications is required, and in
determining the extent of any mitigation requireme general locality and a specific site for their facilities.
nts. If
these buffer distances cannot be met, it does not m
ean
that resource consents will automatically be decline
d.
The distances in Table 1 above are calculated from t
he
wall of the nearest shed. However, in the case of t
unnel
sheds (fan-forced ventilation along the length of the
shed, exiting at one end), the buffer distances are
calculated from the shed exit end, provided that she
d
construction and maintenance are such that all fugit
ive
emissions are minimised.
c)
Future expansion
Prevailing winds
Meteorology
f)
Shed configuration
increasing the height of discharge points;
er
than parallel to them; and
with multiple emission points, rather than a
single discharge source (but see below re:
discharge point design);
ns
possibly shelter belt plantings (but see [l]
will also have to apply, such as (1) the avoidance of
Screening below).
conflict between air discharge points and neighbouri
ng
dwellings (2) land contours (3) orientation to the sun Having the point of discharge at least 3 metres above
.
the
peak roofline of the shed and adjacent buildings provi
g) Discharge point design
des
maximum dispersion, by avoiding eddies and
Dispersion of discharges is enhanced by:
downdraughts and promoting dilution.
168
h)
Shed construction
tem
as sensitive receiving environments, unless the site i
s
them free of draughts and leaks, and subsequently s
both downslope, and downwind under all prevailing
well
maintained. Materials should be impervious, to assis wind
directions. Sheds should not be sited on slopes abov
t in
cleaning and to avoid absorption of odours. Horizont e
sensitive receiving environments. The direction of ni
al
surfaces (other than the floor) will tend to accumula ght
breezes should be considered.
te
dust and other wastes, and should be avoided. Floor
ing
must be impervious and easily cleaned and disinfect
ed.
Ventilation systems should not allow rain to enter th
e
building and dampen litter.
sion.
Katabatic drift (the movement of air at night as it co
ols
A well-insulated shed will mean less air flow is requi down) tends to flow down slopes, and can carry long
distances.
red to
Aprons and access roading
maintain shed temperature, and hence improves dil j)
ution
These should be constructed of impervious material,
and mixing downwind of the shed.
i)
Topography
and
large enough to allow clean out of shed litter and loa
ding
for transport off site, without litter falling onto soil,
m)
Air flow
at
the same time be remembered that planting that
encroaches around the buildings will prevent free air
the removal of damp litter around drinkers; flow
around them, and may need to be avoided in the
interests of adequate ventilation of the sheds and
and
dispersion of emissions. A minimum separation betwe
adjustment of fogging spray systems, if use en
buildings and tress of 20 metres is advised. However,
shading and cooling of sheds by trees in summer ma
d, so
y
that droplets do not fall onto litter.
also be an advantage. Similarly, parallel poultry hous
es
Nipple drinkers or drip cups (or alternative onshould be separated by a distance of at least five tim
es
demand
the height of the buildings if dispersion of emissions i
systems) are preferred over water troughs or bell
s to
drinkers, to avoid wetting litter.
be maximised.
A litter moisture content of 20-25% is considered
n) Dead birds
optimal,
Dead birds should be collected from the sheds and
avoiding dust (too dry) and odour (too damp), and
promoting aerobic bacterial action. If litter is caking disposed of on a daily basis. Acceptable options inclu
de
or
holding in frozen storage pending removal off site,
sticky, it is too wet.
incineration in a licensed incinerator, disposal in an o
ffal
l) Screening
hole, or a properly controlled composting operation.
Tree planting that screens buildings from neighbours
o) Offal holes
or
Refer to Rule 35 of the plan for offal hole requirement
other sensitive receiving environments should be
a suitable depth of bedding litter;
s. A
sealed and lined offal hole will promote anaerobic
decomposition and is generally favoured for small
numbers of mortality, subject to avoiding an
accumulation of methane gas (explosive and
suffocating).
p)
Litter spillage
site.
q)
Litter stockpiling
r)
Litter spreading
169
as practicable, spread litter only when the wind is a
way
from neighbours, roads, and sensitive receiving
the
environments.
s)
Noise
complaint;
ult
of the incident; and
ncil
can consider. However, it is a matter of observation
the nature of any feedback given back to the
that
complainant.
reducing awareness of an activity will reduce sensiti
vity to
that operation. Appropriate management of noise u) Emission abatement technology - dust
generation and noise reduction measures will reduc
Dust mitigation measures include:
e the
likelihood of complaints.
control of dust content of supplied litter;
t)
Complaints
buildings;
ber
of the complainant (if known);
the wind direction and speed at the time of
the
incident;
general weather conditions (e.g. humid, fine
and clear, misty);
general operational status of the farm;
any on-farm circumstances that may be
related
to the incident;
ng;
tree screening;
sing
controlling vehicle speeds on unpaved acces agents on the market, the efficacy of these is general
ly
unproven.
tracks.
v)
w)
e
designed so as to avoid ponding or stagnation of
washdown water.
s;
and
tree screening.
170
y)
Feed formulations
171
172