Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 01
Introduction
atural fibers are prospective reinforcing materials and their use until now has been
more traditional than technical. They have long served many useful purposes but
the application of materials technology for the utilization of natural fibers as the
reinforcement in concrete has only taken place in comparatively recent years. In developing
countries construction of cement concrete building with durable design and low cost fiber
reinforcement is a technological challenge. Fiber-reinforced concrete is concrete containing
fibrous material which increases its structural integrity. It contains short discrete fibers that
are uniformly distributed and randomly oriented. Fibers include steel fibers, glass
fibers, synthetic fibers and natural fibers each of which lend varying properties to the
concrete. Carbon fibers use are restricted in cementitious composites on a commercial level
due to economic consideration and their non-ecological performance. Natural fibers have the
potential to be used as reinforcement to overcome the inherent deficiencies in cementitious
materials. Considerable researches are being done for use of reinforcing fibers like jute,
bamboo, sisal, akwara, coconut husk, sugarcane bagasse in cement composites mostly in case
of building materials. Use of natural fibers in a relatively brittle cement matrix has achieved
considerable strength, and toughness of the composite. The durability of such fibers in a
highly alkaline cement matrix must be taken into consideration by effective modifications. A
specific chemical composition has to be chosen that can modify the fiber surface as well as
strengthen the cement composite.
1.1 Background
Cement concrete composite is the most important building material and its consumption is
increasing in all countries. The only disadvantage of cement concrete is its brittleness, with
relatively low tensile strength and poor resistance to crack opening and propagation and
negligible elongation at break. To overcome these discrepancies reinforcement with dispersed
fibers might play an important role. Steel is the conventional reinforcing material in concrete.
Although steel enhances the strength and modulus of concrete but it lacks the ability to
absorb mechanical impact. The steel makes the reinforced cement concrete (RCC) structure
heavy and in due course of time as a result of water/moisture diffusion through micro crack
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar
Page 1
Page 2
1.2 Methodology
The approach adopted over the course of the project was divided into several divisions after
which the use of Jute concrete was found out through the analysis of properties and its
behavior.
Page 3
Figure 1: (a) Soaked jute in NaOH, (b) Casting of jute mortar, (c) Jute
mortar paver blocks
Selective choice and composition optimization of chemical and polymer for modification
of jute fiber.
Optimized process development for mixing and casting of jute fiber reinforced cement
concrete composite.
Optimized fiber length and loading in cement composite for best possible mechanical
properties.
Page 4
Page 5
Chapter 02
Literature review
Introduction
Fibers have been used to reinforce brittle materials from time immemorial, dating back to the
Egyptian and Babylonian eras, if not earlier. Straws were used to reinforce sun-baked bricks
and mud-hut walls, horse hair was used to reinforce plaster, and asbestos bers have been
used to reinforce Portland cement mortars. Research in the late 1950s and early 1960s by
Romualdi and Batson (1963) and Romualdi and Mandel (1964) on closely spaced random
bers, primarily steel bers, heralded the era of using the ber composite concretes we know
today. In addition, Shah and Rangan (1971), Swamy (1975), and several other researchers in
the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Russia embarked on extensive investigations
in this area, exploring other bers in addition to steel. By the 1960s, steel-ber concrete
began to be used in pavements, in particular. Other developments using bundled berglass as
the main composite reinforcement in concrete beams and slabs were introduced by Nawy et
al. (1971) and Nawy and Neuwerth (1977). From the 1970s to the present, the use of steel
bershas been well established as a complementary reinforcement to increase cracking
resistance, flexural and shear strength, and impact resistance of reinforced concrete elements
both in situ cast and precast.
and compensate for the lack of ductility and strength. Furthermore, steel
reinforcement is adopted to overcome high potentially tensile stresses and shear stresses at
critical location in concrete member.
Page 6
Figure 2: NATURAL FIBERs. (1)Paper pulp (2).Jute (3)Elephant Grass (4)Bamboo (5)coconut husk (6)Sisal
Even though the addition of steel reinforcement significantly increases the strength of
concrete,the development of micro cracks must be controlled to produce concrete with
homogenous tensile properties.
Concrete is weak in tension. Micro cracks begin to generate in the matrix of a structural
element at about 10 to 15% of the ultimate load, propagating into macro cracks at 25 to 30%
of the ultimate load. Consequently, plain concrete members cannot be expected to sustain
large transverse loading without the addition of continuous-bar reinforcing elements in the
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar
Page 7
Page 8
Diameter .001
in.
Specific
Gravity
E, ksi x 1000
Tensile
Strength, ksi
Strain at
Failure, %
4-40
4-13
4-5
7.8
7.8
2.5-2.7
29
23.2
10.44-11.6
50-250
300
360-500
3.5
3
3.6-4.8
20-160
1-40
4-3
0.9
0.96
1.38
0.5
725-25
1.45-2.5
80-110
29-435
80-170
8
3-80
10-50
4-47
.0008-1.2
3-35
1.44
2.6-3.4
1.9
9-17
23.8-28.4
33.4-55.1
525
29-500
260-380
2.5-3.6
2-3
5-1.5
8-4.7
1.5
1.45-5.8
44-131
<8
4-16
2-16
4-8
40-160
17
1.12-1.15
1.5
1.02-1.04
0.96
-
1.89-3.77
2.76-3.77
4.79-5.8
3.7-4.64
.076-.464
.716
41-82
17-29
51-73
36-51
26
3-5
10-25
1.5-1.9
3.6
Steel
High Tensile
Stainless
Glass
Polymeric
Polypropylene
Polyethylene
Polyester
Amarid
Asbestos
Carbon
Natural
Wood
Cellulose
Sisal
Coir(Coconut)
Bamboo
Jute
Akwr
Elephant
Grass
The introduction of ber additions to concrete was aimed primarily at enhancing the tensile
strength of concrete. As is well known, the tensile strength is 8 to l4% of the compressive
strength of normal concretes with resulting cracking at low stress levels. Such a weakness is
partially overcome by the addition of reinforcing bars, which can be either steel or berglass,
as main continuous reinforcement in beams and one-way and two-way structural slabs or slabs
on grade As indicated earlier, the continuous reinforcing elements cannot stop the
development of micro cracks. Fibers, on the other hand, are discontinuous and randomly
distributed in the matrix, in both the tensile and compressive zones of a structural element.
They are able to add to the stiffness and crackcontrol performance by preventing the micro
cracks from propagating and widening and also by increasing ductility due to their energyabsorption capacity.
In the past few decades, various materials have emerged to ease the construction process. Jutereinforced fiber is one such material that offers various benefits in structures. Jute concrete is a
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar
Page 9
The main material in preparation is Jute which is easily,freely,abundantly and at low cost
available.
Jute Mortar Blocks have more compressive strength than other ordinary mortar block.
Due to Tensile properties of fiber which get embed when jute is mixed with mortar, Jute
mortar blocks have more tensile strength.
Jute Mortar blocks are light weight due to which they can be best alternative when
roofing is considered.
Inspite of adding jute, there is no change in appearance and as such jute mortar block and
ordinary mortar block look same.
Walls made of jute mortar can be easily painted.Even more jute gives a pleasing texture
when it is exposed to surface.
As the fiber blocks the voids, it has high acoustic performance,thus can be used in
seminar halls and cinemas.
Jute mortar is very workable and thus can be formed into different shapes such as
blocks,panels and sheets with ease.
Preparation requires time, as such may not get prepared when urgently required.
Can get disintegrate when exposed to water for prolonged periods of time
Page 10
Page 11
2.5 Introduction
Jute is a long, soft, shiny vegetable fiber that can be spun into coarse, strong threads. It is
produced from plants in the genus Corchorus, which was once classified with the family
Tiliaceae, more recently with Malvaceae, and has now been reclassified as belonging to the
family Sparrmanniaceae. The primary source of the fiber is Corchorus olitorius, but it is
considered inferior to Corchorus capsularis. "Jute" is the name of the plant or fiber that is
used to make burlap, Hessian or gunny cloth.
Jute is one of the most affordable natural fibers and is second only to cotton in amount
produced and variety of uses of vegetable fibers. Jute fibers are composed primarily of the
plant materials cellulose and lignin. It falls into the bast fiber category (fiber collected from
bast, the phloem of the plant, sometimes called the "skin") along with kenaf, industrial hemp,
flax (linen), ramie, etc. The industrial term for jute fiber is raw jute. The fibers are off-white
to brown, and 14 metres (313 feet) long. Jute is also called "the golden fiber" for its color
and high cash value.
Page 12
2.6 Production:
Jute is a rain-fed crop with little need for fertilizer or pesticides, in contrast to cotton's heavy
requirements. Production is concentrated mostly in India's states of Assam, Bihar, West
Bengal and Bangladesh. The jute fiber comes from the stem and ribbon (outer skin) of the
jute plant. The fibers are first extracted by retting. The retting process consists of bundling
jute stems together and immersing them in slow running water. There are two types of
retting: stem and ribbon. After the retting process, stripping begins. In the stripping process,
non-fibrous matter is scraped off, then the workers dig in and grab the fibers from within the
jute stem. India is the world's largest producer of jute, but imported approximately 162,000
tonnes of raw fiber and 175,000 tonnes of jute products in 2011. India, Pakistan, and China
import significant quantities of jute fiber and products from Bangladesh, as does the United
Kingdom, Japan, United States, France, Spain, Cte d'Ivoire, Germany and Brazil.
Extraction of Jute
Figure
4: Extraction
of Jute
Extraction
of Jute
Page 13
and
different
physical,
mechanical and hydrogen bonds formed between them. The chemical compositions of
major commercial species of jute .
Jute
C.Camsulars
Alphacellulose
60.0-63.0
Hemicellulose
21.0-24.0
Lignin
12.0-130
Fats & Waxes
0.4-1.0
Pectin
0.2-1.5
Protein or Nitrogenous matter, etc 0.80-1.9
(%N2 x 6.25)
Ash
0.7-1.2
C. Olitorius
58.0-59.0
22.0-25.0
13.0-14.0
0.4-0.9
0.2-0.5
0.8-1.6
0.5-1.2
Page 14
3
4
5
6
L/B Ratio(Average)
Fiber Fitness
Fiber Length (After carding)
Density
7
8
9
B
10
Bulk Density
Degree of crystallinity(X-ray)
Angle of Orientation (X-ray)
Moisture Absorption
Moisture Regain
11
C.
13
Mechanical Properties
Tenacity
14
15
Elongation at Break
Initial Modulus
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
23
24
25
-Average
-Range
-Average
-Range
2.50mm
08-6.00mm
18m
10-25m
110
1.3-4.0 tex
2.50 cm
1.46 g/cc
1.10-1.34 g/cc
0.4-0.5 g/cc
55-60%
7-9
-True
-Apparent
- at 65% RH
- at 100% RH
- Diameter wise
- Cross-sectional area
wise
13.8%
20%
75%
75%
Page 15
Zone of Sand
I
II
III
IV
3.SODIUM HYDROXIDE: Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), also known as lye and caustic soda,
is an inorganic compound. It is a white solid and highly caustic metallic base and alkali salt
which is available in pellets, flakes, granules, and as prepared solutions at a number of
different concentrations. Sodium hydroxide forms an approximately 50% (by weight)
Page 16
4.JUTE:There are various grades of Jute available in market each having its own
characteristics and properties. But we have used Jute in threaded form available in market.
This type of Jure is cheap, readily available and easy to handle. Moreover it is available in
any quantity. Approximate weight of each jute ball was 80 gms. The Jute was cut in small
required length so that proper requirement may be fulfilled.
Page 17
Page 18
Modification and
characterization of Jute
Fiber
Chapter 03
Modification and characterization of jute fiber
3.1. Materials for modification
Jute fibers obtained from thread balls available in market were used. Analytical grade sodium
hydroxide (NaOH) and commercially available carboxylated styrene-butadiene copolymer
based polymer latex (Sika Polymer latex Power) were used for fiber surface modification.
Page 19
Modification and
characterization of Jute
Fiber
Equation 2: Plausible reaction chemistry of alkali treated jute fiber and polymer la
Page 20
Chapter 04
Experimental Procedure
4.1 MATERIALS:
The materials used in this study were ordinary OPC Khyber Cement (43 grade), fine sand,
jute , sodium hydroxide (NaOH), carboxylated styrene-butadiene copolymer based polymer
latex and tap water
Page 21
Figure 12: (a)Jute soaked in NaOH (b) Jute soaked in Polymer (c) Jute in distilled water (d) Oven dried Jute
Page 22
Page 23
immersed for 24 h in half of the total volume of water required for mortar preparation in a
container. Next the half of the total amount of cement required was added to wet jute in that
container with constant stirring to obtain jute-cement slurry.
Page 24
The jute cement slurry was then slowly poured into the cement mortar mix. The remaining
amount of water was then added and the mixing was for further 5 min. The fresh cement
mortar thus obtained was cast immediately in 150mm x 150mm x 150mm cubes and 100mm
x 100mm x 500mm beams. After casting of cubes and beams the vibrator was used for the
proper compaction of the jute reinforced cement mortar. And then all the moulds were
allowed to setting.
.
Page 25
The moulds were opened after 24hrs of casting. The plain cement mortar samples were
placed in the water bath tank for curing after writing the sample code on them. But for the
chemically modified jute cement mortar samples we place the in the open atmosphere for
next 24 to 36 hours after writing the sample code and the place them in the water bath tank
for curing.
All samples were cured in the water bath tank to make sure that maximum hydration process
within the sample can take place.
Page 26
Page 27
In this test the strength is obtained in tonnes. The measured compressive strength of the
specimen shall be calculated by the maximum load applied to the specimen during the by the
cross sectional area calculated from mean dimensions of the section and shall be expressed to
the nearest MPa. Out of many test applied to the concrete, this is the utmost important which
gives an idea about all the characteristics of concrete. By this single test one judge that
weather concreting has been done properly or not. These specimens are tested by
compression testing machine after 14 days curing or 28 days curing. Load should be applied
gradually at the rate of 140 kg/cm2 per minute till the Specimens fails. Load at the failure
divided by area of specimen gives the compressive strength of concrete.
Calculations:
Compressive strength = Maximum Load / Area
= P/A
Where:
P = max. load
A = area of the specimen
Page 28
4.7Test for flexural strength of cement mortar & reinforced cement mortar beams
To determine the Flexural Strength of cement mortar, which comes into play when a slab
with inadequate sub-grade support is subjected to wheel loads and / or there are volume
changes due to temperature / shrinking. Test specimens shall be prepared by moldings
concrete to a beam section, curing and storing in accordance with standard procedure. The
section of the beam shall be square of 100 mm or 150 mm. The overall length of the
specimen shall be 4d to 5d. The ratio of d to the maximum particle size of aggregate shall be
not less than three. Circular rollers manufactured out of steel having cross section with
diameter 38 mm will be used for providing support and loading points to the specimens. The
length of the rollers shall be at least 10 mm more than the width of the test specimen. A total
of four rollers shall be used, three out of which shall be capable of rotating along their own
axes. The distance between the outer rollers (i.e. span) shall be 3d and the distance between
the inner rollers shall be d. The inner rollers shall be equally spaced between the outer rollers,
such that the entire system is systematic. The specimen stored in water shall be tested
immediately on removal from water; whilst they are still wet. The test specimen shall be
placed in the machine correctly centered with the longitudinal axis of the specimen at right
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar
Page 29
Calculations:The flexural strength of the specimen is calculated from the following formula
Flexural strength = Pl/bd2
Where:
b = width of specimen
d = failure point depth
L = supported length
P =max. Load
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Chapter 05
Observation and Results
Page 37
SAMPLE
DATE OF
CASTING
WEIGHT
OF
SAMPLE
(Kg)
STAGE OF
STRENGTH
(Days)
CODE FOR
SAMPLE
FAILURE
LOAD
(KNs)
STRENGTH
(MPa)
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
23/04/2015
6.85
14
21
28
MS1
170
7.55
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
23/04/2015
6.85
14
21
28
MS2
180
8.0
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
04/05/2015
6.85
14
21
28
MS1
110
4.9
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
23/04/2015
10
14
21
28
MS3
10
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
04/05/2015
10
14
21
28
MS3
3.6
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
29/04/2015
10
14
21
28
MS4
3.6
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
01/05/2015
6.35
14
21
28
0.25%
130
5.9
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
01/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
0.25%
207
9.2
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
01/05/2015
6.35
14
21
28
0.5%
140
6.15
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
01/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
0.5%
215
9.52
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
01/05/2015
6.35
14
21
28
1.0%
135
6.05
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
01/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
1.0%
210
9.3
Page 38
DATE OF
CASTING
WEIGHT
OF
SAMPLE
(Kg)
STAGE OF
STRENGTH
(Days)
CODE FOR
SAMPLE
FAILURE
LOAD
(KNs)
STRENGTH
(MPa)
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.3
14
21
28
11
140
6.35
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
11
210
9.3
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
12
145
6.4
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
12
230
10.12
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
13
155
6.77
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.2
14
21
28
13
235
10.41
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.3
14
21
28
21
150
6.57
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
21
230
10.1
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.3
14
21
28
22
150
6.65
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.3
14
21
28
22
235
10.26
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.2
14
21
28
23
155
6.9
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
05/05/2015
6.2
14
21
28
23
240
10.71
Page 39
DATE OF
CASTING
WEIGHT
OF
SAMPLE
(Kg)
STAGE OF
STRENGTH
(Days)
CODE FOR
SAMPLE
FAILURE
LOAD
KNs
STRENGTH
MPa
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
06/05/2015
6.25
14
21
31
140
6.35
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
06/05/2015
6.25
14
21
28
31
220
9.82
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
06/05/2015
6.2
14
21
28
32
150
6.7
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
06/05/2015
6.2
14
21
28
32
230
10.26
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
06/05/2015
6.1
14
21
28
33
155
6.85
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
06/05/2015
6.2
14
21
28
33
235
10.56
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
06/05/2015
9.5
14
21
28
0.8%
12
4.8
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
06/05/2015
9.4
14
21
28
0.8%
14.5
5.8
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
06/05/2015
9.4
14
21
28
1.0%
12.5
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
06/05/2015
9.3
14
21
28
1.0%
15.5
6.2
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
06/05/2015
9.4
14
21
28
1.2%
12
4.8
06/05/2015
9.3
14
21
28
1.2%
15
Page 40
SAMPLE
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
WEIGHT OF
SAMPLE (Kg)
SAMPLE
CODE
COMPOSITION
6.85
MS1
6.85
MS2
6.85
MS1
10
MS3
10
MS3
10
MS4
6.35
0.25%
6.25
0.25%
6.35
0.5%
6.25
0.5%
6.35
1.0%
6.25
1.0%
Page 41
SAMPLE
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
WEIGHT
OF
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
CODE
(Kg)
COMPOSITION
6.3
11
6.25
11
6.25
12
6.25
12
6.25
13
6.2
13
6.3
21
6.25
21
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
6.3
22
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
6.3
22
23
23
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x
150 MM
6.2
6.2
Page 42
CODE FOR
SAMPLE
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
6.25
31
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
6.25
31
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
6.2
32
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
6.2
32
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
6.1
33
CUBIC BLOCK
150 x 150 x 150
MM
6.2
33
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
9.5
0.8%
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
9.4
0.8%
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
9.4
1.0%
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
9.3
1.0%
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
9.4
1.2%
BEAM
100 x 100 x 500
MM
9.3
1.2%
SAMPLE
COMPOSITION
Page 43
Graphical Interpretation of
Chapter 06
Graphical Interpretation of Results
7
6
1% jute
compressive strength
MPa
5
4
1% jute
1% jute
0.50%
1%
0% jute
3
2
1
0
0
0.25%
Compressive strength
MPa
7
6
1%jute
1% jute
1 %jute
5
4
0% jute
3
2
1
0
MS1'
11
12
13
SAMPLES
Graph 2: Jute treated with 0.25% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with different solutions of polymer 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol
Page 44
Graphical Interpretation of
1% jute
1% jute
1% jute
5
4
0% jute
3
2
1
0
MS1'
21
22
23
SAMPLES
Graph 3: Jute treated with 0.5% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with different solutions of polymer 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol
Compressive strength
MPa
7
6
1% jute
1% jute
1% jute
32
33
5
0% jute
4
3
2
1
0
MS1'
31
SAMPLES
Graph 4:Jute treated with 0.1% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with different solutions of polymer 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol
Page 45
Graphical Interpretation of
Flexural Strength
MPa
0.8% jute
1.2%jute
4
0% jute
3
2
1
0
MS4
0.80%
1%
1.20%
SAMPLES
Graph 5: Jute treated with 0.1% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with 0.1% vol. /vol. solutions of polymer
0% JUTE
WEIGHT
(Kg)
9.8
9.7
9.6
9.5
9.4
9.3
0.8% JUTE
1% JUTE
1.2% JUTE
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
9.2
9.1
MS4
SAMPLES
Graph 6: Jute treated with 0.1% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with 0.1% vol. /vol. solutions of polymer
Page 46
Graphical Interpretation of
6.8 0% JUTE
WEIGHT
(Kg)
6.6
6.4
1% JUTE1% JUTE1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE1% JUTE
1% JUTE1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
6.2
1% JUTE
6
5.8
5.6
MS1'
0.25% 0.50%
1%
11
12
13
21
22
23
31
32
33
SAMPLES
Graph 7: Jute treated with 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol.
solutions of polymer
1% jute
1% jute
1% jute
0.50%
1%
compressive strength
MPa
8
7
0% jute
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
0.25%
Graph 8: Jute treated with 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0% wt. /vol. solutions of NaOH solutions only
Page 47
Graphical Interpretation of
Compressive strength
MPa
10
1%jute
1 %jute
12
13
1% jute
8
0% jute
6
4
2
0
MS2
11
SAMPLES
Graph 9: Jute treated with 0.25% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with different solutions of polymer 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol.
Compressive Strength
MPa
10
1% jute
1% jute
21
22
1% jute
8
0% jute
6
4
2
0
MS1
23
SAMPLES
Graph 10: Jute treated with 0.5% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with different solutions of polymer 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol
Page 48
Graphical Interpretation of
1% jute
1%jute
1 %jute
32
33
8
0% jute
6
4
2
0
MS2
31
SAMPLES
Graph 11: Jute treated with 0.1% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with different solutions of polymer 0.25%,
0.5%, 1.0% vol. /vol.
1%jute
0.8% jute
1.2%jute
Flexural Strength
MPa
5
4
0% jute
3
2
1
0
MS3
0.8%
1%
1.2%
SAMPLES
Graph 12: Jute treated with 0.1% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with 0.1% vol. /vol. solutions of polymer
Page 49
Graphical Interpretation of
WEIGHT
(Kg)
9.8
9.6
9.4
0.8% JUTE
9.2
1% JUTE
1.2% JUTE
1%
1.2%
9
8.8
MS3
0.8%
SAMPLES
Graph 13: Jute treated with 0.1% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with 0.1% vol. /vol. solutions of polymer
6.8 0% JUTE
6.6
WEIGHT
(Kg)
6.4
1% JUTE
1% JUTE1% JUTE1% JUTE1% JUTE1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
1% JUTE
6.2
6
5.8
5.6
MS1
0.25% 0.50%
1%
11
12
13
21
22
23
31
32
33
SAMPLES
Graph 14: Jute treated with 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0% wt. /vol. solution of NaOH and then treated with 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0% vol.
/vol. solutions of polymer
Page 50
Chapter 07
Discussion
Construction industry is revolutionised by new emerging trends and technology. Jute mortar
is one of the new advanced technology but with little knowledge and experimental data. It is
because of this that Jute mortar is not being so regularly and at large scale .Jute mortar can be
used with traditional building techniques thus using renewable resource at less cost that too
with good strength. New technology methods in cement industry results in new machinery
and expertise, jute mortar on other hand uses basis raw material easily available and at cheap
cost.
Concrete structures are structures predominantly made of cement, which is a hydraulic
material that hydrates with water to generate a stable material. This hydration reaction
produces an amount of calcium hydroxide equivalent to about one third of an amount of
cement. Calcium hydroxide is a strong alkali having a pH of about 12 to 13, and forms a
passive film on a rebar embedded in the concrete structures to prevent rebar corrosion,
thereby maintaining the strength of the concrete structures. However, the nature of concrete
structures causes hairline cracks to form during initial curing. When water permeates into the
cracks, the cracks in the concrete structures may grow by the repetition of freezing and
melting of water depending on changes in temperature, which may remarkably reduce the
durability of the concrete structures. Particularly, when airborne salinity or an acidic
substance such as carbon dioxide increasing in its level due to air pollution permeates into the
concrete structures, the concrete structures may suffer from chloride-induced corrosion and
carbonation. The corrosion may be accelerated by the rebar embedded in the concrete
structures to maintain the strength of the concrete structures. In other words, when an acidic
substance reacts with hydrate in concrete, in particular calcium hydroxide, the pH value of
the concrete structures reduces below 10, accompanied by the breakdown of the passive film
on the rebar, which causes the concrete structures to deteriorate by the likes of the rebar
corrosion. By the rebar corrosion, the volume increases, which then applies tension to the
surface of the concrete structures. Hence, the cracks on the surface of the concrete structures
may grow to reduce the strength of the concrete structures. Concrete deterioration may
progress under physical and chemical environment. Accordingly, extensive repair is needed.
To repair concrete, a variety of repair compositions have been used. Among them, there is
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Srinagar
Page 51
Page 52
Figure 41: Fabrication of chemically modified jute fiber reinforced precast concrete pipe
Page 53
Figure 42: (a) Pipes without jute fiber reinforcement, (b) Pipes with untreated jute fiber reinforcement, (c) Pipes with
chemically modified jute fiber reinforcement
Figure 43: (a)Hydrostatic testing of pipes (b) Three edge bearing test of pipes
Page 54
Figure 44: Fabrication of chemically modified jute fiber reinforced prestressed concrete pole
Page 55
Figure 45: Chemically modified jute fiber reinforced prestressed concrete pole
Figure 46: Cantilever testing of modified jute fiber Reinforced concrete electric pole
Figure 47: Maximum flexibility before failure of modified jute fiber reinforced concrete electric pole
Page 56
Figure 48: Fabrication process of chemically modified jute fiber reinforced concrete pavers block
Concrete paver blocks with and without modified jute fiber reinforcement
Page 57
Page 58
Figure 51: Chopped jute fiber reinforced cement-fly ash sheet composites
Page 59
Chapter 08
Environmental Impact
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Chapter 09
Conclusion
This work demonstrated the potentiality of jute fiber as reinforcing agent in cement
composites for the use of sewer pipes, prestressed concrete pole, and paver blocks.
The entire investigation is summarized below.
Systematic experimental processes were developed for proper modification of jute
fiber with alkali and polymer.
Chemically modified jute fiber reinforced cement composites were fabricated,
following a systematic experimental program by considering different experimental
parameters like different processes, fiber content by weight %, fiber length, and
curing time.
Testing of jute fiber reinforced cement concrete/mortar composite showed
appreciable improvement in mechanical properties, which encourage fabricating
prototype cement concrete/mortar products.
The following jute fiber reinforced cement mortar products were developed:
o Chemically modified jute fiber reinforced cube of dimensions 150mm x 150mm x
150mm.
o Chemically modified jute fiber reinforced beam of dimensions 100mm x 100mm x
500mm.
Successful trials of fabrication and testing of 150mm x 150mm x 150mm cube and
100mm x 100mm x 100m beam were carried out on Universal Testing Machine
(UTM) in structural laboratory.
Compressive and flexural strengths of chemically treated jute fiber reinforced
cement concrete are improved by 48% and 55% respectively than that of the
concrete without jute fiber reinforcement.
Weight of the chemically modified jute fiber reinforced cement mortar reduces by
5-10% of the weight of cement mortar without jute fiber reinforcement.
Page 64
Chapter 10
Achievements
Chemical modification of jute fiber improved tensile strength and elongation at break
about 41 and 34 % respectively.
Water absorption of jute fiber was reduced to 108 % from 210 % after chemical and
polymer treatment.
Technique of short jute fiber (optimum length 4-6 mm) dispersion in concrete/mortar
was optimized both in dry and wet basis.
Concrete mixing process was optimized with standard ratios of sand, cement, and water
to obtain a cement mortar having adequate workability during casting.
Workability of jute fiber incorporated concrete mix was improved using tannin as
admixture.
Critical fiber loading was optimized by fabricating cement concrete with different
amounts of jute fiber (0.8-1.2% by weight). Maximum compressive and flexural strength
was achieved at 1% fiber loading in cement composite which was about 4 kg per cubic
meter concrete and 5.5 kg per cubic meter cement mortar.
Compressive and flexural strengths of chemically treated jute fiber reinforced cement
mortar (lab based) were improved by 48 and 55% respectively than that of the cement
mortar without jute fiber reinforcement.
Degradation study of jute fiber in cement matrices showed that the rate of degradation of
treated jute fibers incorporated in cement paste was very slow whereas in case of
untreated jute fibers incorporated in cement paste degraded rapidly with time.
Chemically modified jute fiber in cement paste retained 97 % of its strength after 90 days
aging duration. Whereas, raw jute fiber in cement paste retained 82% of its strength after
90 days aging.
Page 65
References
Concrete Technology
By M.S.Shetty
Concrete Technology
By P.D.Kulkarni
Page 66
Page 67