Diffusion in concentrated solutions

© All Rights Reserved

Просмотров: 8

Fick

Diffusion in concentrated solutions

© All Rights Reserved

- Equilibrium Staged Operations - Summary
- Vapor in Air Diffusion
- Diffusion Coating
- Unit Operation 2
- DEHP Migration Behavior from Excessively Plasticized PVC Sheets
- Lecture2 Diffusion SOLID STATE
- KAPPA_DDA_book.pdf
- Microsoft Word - Corrosion SeminarOK
- Flujo Inducido Medio Poroso
- Dispersion
- 699
- Vapour Diffusion Coefficient of Acetone
- sp-v2.2-ch4.pdf
- A Principle of Mixing Similarity and Its Application to Inhomogeneous Combustion 1957
- Respiration 2 2017
- derived SCM
- Einstein Brownian05
- Microsoft Word - CAPITO_1
- Modeling LiFePO4 Cell
- Latest UG Syllabus2008-2009(3rd Sem 2008-09)

Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

In the simplest terms, Fick's law of diffusion at constant temperature and pressure is

Ji = D i ci

We would have liked to make the statement as we would with Fourier's law in heat conduction and

stop. Unfortunately, we cannot do that; mass transport is not as simple as we may have thought.

As stated, the constitutive equation describes only diffusive flux and not the net flux of the

chemical species i. It is only under circumstances of dilute solutions that we can use Ficks law to

evaluate the net transport.

For concentrated solutions, meaning now general circumstances, the explanation of mass flux

from a molecular dynamics viewpoint is rarely grasped firmly by someone new to the topic. So

dont feel bad if you are lost the first time. The description is not complete until both the units and

the reference frame have been given. We'll give the concept of flux a slightly more detailed

explanation here.

We begin with the concept of a flux velocity. Let's consider a gas mixture with no external

imposed force. All the molecules will be in constant thermal motionBrownian motion. At

uniform temperature and pressure, the mean velocity of all the molecules would be zero, i.e., there

is no net flow (bulk motion) in any direction. However, the molecules could have finite mean

speed related to the thermal motion; this is a phenomenon described by the Maxwell-Boltzmann

equation in physical chemistry.

Now consider the situation when the gas mixture is nonuniform. The source of nonuniformity

is general; it may arise from external forces and temperature and not necessarily confined to

concentration gradients. Now for sure we expect the species i to have an average velocity vi in

some direction relative to a stationary coordinate. The transport of the species i, in terms of the

mass flux, is defined as

ni = i vi

(1)

where i is the mass density of species i. Note that the unit of mass flux is mass per area per time

[e.g., g.cm2.s1 ] in other words, the rate of mass transport per unit area. The velocity is also

called the flux velocity. If we divide Eq. (1) by the molecular weight of species i, we have now the

molar flux:

N i = ci v i

(2)

where ci = i/MWi is the molar concentration of species i.

A nonuniform mixture of molecules may have a resultant motion due to the motion of

individual molecules. We define for the mixture as a whole the mass average velocity:

v =

i v i 1

= i vi = i vi

i

(3)

where the summation is over all the species in the mixture. We also have used = i as the

total mass density and i = i/ is the mass fraction of species i. Again, we can divide the mass

definition by the molecular weight of each species and arrive at the molar average velocity of the

mixture:

c i v i 1

v* =

= ci vi = yi vi

(4)

ci

c

where we have used c = ci as the total molar density and yi = ci/c is the mole fraction of species

1

i. Thus v and v* are the mass fraction or mole fraction weighted average velocities.

In general, the motion of a mixture as a whole can be described by the total mass flux v, or

the total molar flux v*c, both in reference to a stationary coordinate system.

Of course, we would not expect the velocity of an individual species vi to be always the same

as the average velocity v or v*. We define the difference (vi v) or (vi v*) as the diffusion

velocities. From the terminology, we may guess ahead that the source of the difference is

concentration gradient. 1

We now define diffusive fluxes as relative to the average velocities. Again, we can use

either the mass diffusive flux:

ji = i (vi v)

(5)

J*i = ci (vi v*)

(6)

We next see what properties we can derive for these fluxes. We begin with molar fluxes,

which properly reflect the distribution of gas molecules. If we substitute the definition of v* in

Eq. (6), we have

c

J *i = c i vi ci c j v j

j

Note that the summation index for all species is j. We know that Ni = civi, and yi = ci/c, so we

have the important result for the diffusive flux of species i:

J *i = N i y i N j

(7)

where, once again, J*i is the difference between the molar flux of the species and the rate of

transport of i due to the local molar flux (or bulk motion) of the mixture. Note that Nj is the

total molar flux of the mixture (identical to v*c). When the bulk motion contribution is

negligible, the transport is purely diffusive, Ni = J*i.

It is instructive and helpful to think of Eq. (7) as

N i = J*i + yi N j

in that the total molar flux of a species is the sum of Fickian diffusive flux and a contribution due

to the bulk motion of the entire mixture.

1

For now, we should remind ourselves that we have made no explicit assumption on the origin

of the flux velocity of an individual velocity, vi , and thus for that matter also the origin of v or

v*. In essence, the flux velocity vi embeds diffusive and convective velocities.

The average velocities v and v* are a result of superimposed molecular motions of all kinds

and they generally manifest in bulk motion of the mixture. When the molecules of an individual

species do not move on average as the same as the bulk fluid, i.e., vi v or vi v*, it may arise

from heterogeneity in physical properties of the mixture. One possibility is severe temperature

gradient and thermal diffusion. However, under most circumstances, we only need consider

gradients in concentration and thus mass diffusion.

2

Note that we now have the choices of using ni and ji in mass units or Ni and J*i in molar

units. In B.S.L. (Table 16.1), you may find a bewildering combinations of other possibilities.

Ignore them for now. Stay with the most common and simple definitions.

2

J *i = N i y i N i

j

Nj

Nj

= Ni 1 yi

Ni

j Ni

(7a)

where the term (1 yi Nj/Ni ) is called the drift factor. The idea is that the diffusive flux J*i in

Eq. (7) is likened to evaluating the "drift" of the species i relative to the bulk motion of the

mixture.

If we now sum Eq. (7) over all species, we have

i J *i = i N i i y i j N j = 0

(8)

since yi = 1. The important result is that the sum of molar diffusion fluxes is zero under all

circumstances.3 In a binary mixture, it means that we must have

J*A = J*B

(9)

We now state the Fick's law of diffusion. For a binary mixture at constant temperature and

pressure, the diffusive flux of species A is

J*A = DAB cA

(10)

where DAB is the binary diffusion coefficient 4 and cA is the concentration gradient. For gas

phase system and problems that may have temperature and pressure variations, Fick's law is more

properly defined as

J*A = c DAB yA

(10a)

to ensure that the driving force is entirely due to concentration gradient and not changes in molar

concentration, c.

For a binary mixture, the molar flux of the species i as state in Eq. (7) is

N A = c DAB y A + y A (N A + N B)

(11)

Repeating the comment after Eq. (7): the molar flux of A, NA, is the Fickian diffusive flux (first

term on the right) superimposed on the flux of species A resulting from the bulk fluid motion (the

second term).

This is the major source of confusion, and would likely remain so until you take a graduate

level course! Eq. (8) is the sum of diffusive fluxes. It does not mean that the molar flux of the

mixture v* is zero. Recall that vi is defined in reference to a stationary coordinate, but Ji is

defined in reference to v*. Loosely speaking, the "drift" of all the species in a mixture evens out

and all the molecules on average follow the bulk motion of the mixture.

Under circumstances when we do not have externally imposed force or fluid flow, the molar

average velocity v* of a gas mixture is nearly zero, while in a liquid mixture, it would be the mass

average velocity v that is nearly zero. The text by Cussler is the best to clear up this point.

4

In an introductory course, we invariably stays with binary mixtures. When we have

multicomponent mixtures, we would use the notation, for species i, Di,m. Solutions to non-dilute

multicomponent diffusion also requires the so-called Stefan-Maxwell equation.

3

When we solve a problem, we need to know (or make a reasonable assumption of) NB as a

function of NA. One simple scenario is equimolar countertransport where NA = NB which is

equivalent to stating that v* = 0.5 Another simple situation is that NB = 0, i.e., the species B

molecules remain essentially stagnant. We can also consider NB = 0 when we have a dilute

mixture of A.

We finish by repeating two classic textbook examples.

Example 1. Stefan diffusion tube

B

z=L

organic liquid A, while air (species B) is blown across the top. Of course,

the species A will diffuse slowly upward. A typical exercise is to find the

concentration (mole fraction) profile of A along the capillary. As we will

see in most mass transport problems, this is not a very useful result. What

we want is the flux of A, and from this quantity, we can estimate the rate of

decrease of the liquid level and the molecular diffusivity of A in B.

h(t)

z=0

Pure A

Figure. E1

assumptions:

(1) Species A is volatile and the mass transport is more than just pure diffusion. That is, we need

to invoke Eq. (11).

(2) Air is not soluble in the liquid A, and the molar flux NB = 0 between z = 0 and z = L.7 Thus

even as species A is evaporating, air is essentially stagnant in the capillary.

(3) In a race between tortoises, the mass transport within the capillary is rather "quick" compared

with the rate of decrease of the liquid level h(t). Hence, we apply the quasi-steady state

assumption to the diffusional problem in the capillary.

Based on a shell balance at steady state for species A, we arrive at

dN A

=0

dz

(E1-1)

in the capillary, meaning that the molar flux NA is a constant. Now, with Eq. (7), we also have

N A = c DAB

dy A

+ yA NA ,

dz

(E1-2)

or

NA =

c DAB dy A

.

(1 y A ) dz

(E1-2a)

d

1 dy A = 0 ,

dz 1 y A dz

(E1-3)

Note that while v* = 0 when we have a so-called equal exchange of molecules NA = NB , the

mass average velocity is nonzero, v 0. That's because molecule weights are different.

6

Not everyone calls this the Stefan tube problem. It is just as commonly referred to as

"diffusion in a stagnant gas film."

7

This fact also follows from (E1-1). Like species A, NB is also constant. Since B is not

soluble in A, the net flux of B at z = 0 is zero, which implies that NB is zero everywhere in the

capillary.

4

which is subjected to boundary conditions yA(0) = yAo, and yA(L) = yAL. The solution is 8

z/L

1 y AL

1 yA

=

1 y Ao

1 y Ao

(E1-4)

The key is to appreciate that the concentration profile is nonlinear. We only expect a linear profile

when we have pure diffusion. And you can certainly plot (E1-4) with the computer to get a better

feel on the nonlinearity of the problem.

Our next agenda is to find the flux NA. The key is never use the final solution which often

leads to a mess before things get cleared up. You can sense that in (E1-4). The smart move is to

make use of the intermediate integration step where we have the gradient dyA/dz (see footnotes to

E1-4). With that and (E1-2a), we can find easily

NA =

c DAB

1 y AL

ln

1 y Ao

L

(E1-5)

which of course is a constant as consistent with (E1-1). It is easy to see that when yAo 1, and

hence also yAL 1, (E1-5) reduces to

NA

c DAB

(y Ao y AL) ,

L

(E1-6)

which is a long-winded way to come back and see why with dilute solutions, we can approximate a

problem with only the pure diffusive term. On this note, one question for you: how do you find

values for yAo and yAL?

Our final step of this problem comes back to the drop in liquid level. We cannot lose sight

that we are solving a quasi-steady state problem. Something else must be changing in time! We

can evaluate the loss of species A by matching the mass flux:

A dh = N A M w,A ,

dt

(E1-7)

where A is the mass density, and MW,A is the molecular weight of A. From here, we need to

substitute (E1-6) into (E1-7) and make a statement how L also changes in time.

We may note that at t = 0, we have L = Lo and h = ho, and hence L = (Lo + ho) h. So the

algebra is much cleaner if we keep L as the variable and use dL/dt = dh/dt instead. You'd be darned

if you can't develop the remaining steps in solving a problem.

Before we leave this example, let's revisit Eq. (E1-2). Even as NB = 0, the diffusive flux J*B

is not. In (E1-2), both terms on the right, the diffusive flux and the bulk motion contribution for

A, are positive. The analogous equation for B is

dy A

dy A

= (1 y A ) , or

= dz ,

dz

1 yA

where is an integration constant which can be found with

y AL

y Ao

dy A

=

1 yA

dz , or hence

0

1 ln 1 y Ao

=L

1 y AL

0 = c DAB

dy B

+ yB NA

dz

(E1-8)

where we have taken note of the fact that DBA = DAB.9 Here, the bulk motion contribution for B

(second term on the right) is positive, but the diffusive term is negative. We should "see" that

since the mole fraction of B is higher at the top (z = L) than at the bottom of the capillary. In fact,

we need these two terms counter to each other perfectly to achieve the zero net flux of B.

Furthermore, you should try this yourself: Add (E1-2) and (E1-8) together and the sum of the

two diffusive terms are zero, as we have derived in Eq. (8).

The main point of this example is to illustrate how we can get a

"drift" and deviate from pure diffusive flux even when the mixture is

dilute. Essentially, we see how a chemical reaction with the specific

stoichiometry selected may give rise to a molar flux, or loosely

speaking, reaction causes flow.

O2

CO

CO2

oxidation reaction, say,

3C + 2O2 > 2CO + CO2

z =

z=0

Figure E2

(E2-1)

Oxygen in the bulk gas phase (say, mainly an inert nitrogen blanket) diffuses toward the

surface, while the products CO and CO2 diffuse away. The assumption is that the bulk gas

concentrations are uniform, and the necessary mass transport is effected within a "thin" gas film of

thickness . Furthermore, the mass transport is at steady state. It is clear that we want to apply Eq.

(7), the more general form of (11), to each species, and we'll use O2 as an illustration.

We need to find eventually Nj. Before that, we need to remember our chemical kinetics. The

rate of change of a species is ri = ir, where r is the rate of the chemical reaction and i is the

stoichiometric coefficient of species i in this reaction. Thus on the same basis (r = ri/i), we can

write

1/2 N O 2 = 1/2 N CO = N CO 2

or

Hence

(E2-2)

N j = N O 2 + N CO + N CO 2 = (1 1 1/2) N O 2 = 1/2 N O 2

(E2-3)

N O 2 = c DO 2 ,m

dy O 2

+ y O 2( 12 N O 2)

dz

or

NO2 =

c DO 2 ,m

(1 +

1

2

dy O 2

y O 2) dz

(E2-4)

For a binary mixture, yA + yB = 1, and thus yA + yB = 0. From Eq. (9) and (10a), we can

write c DAB yA = c DBA yB. Taken together, we have DAB = DBA for a a binary mixture.

where DO2,m denotes the diffusion coefficient of oxygen in the mixture. If the gas mixture is so

dilute such that there is negligible interaction among the O2, CO and CO2 molecules, we can use

the binary diffusion coefficient of oxygen in nitrogen, DO2,N2 as an approximation.

Even when the gas mixture is dilute, the flux is affected by the change in the number of

moles. In (E2-4), we see that the drift factor (1 + 1/2yO2) in this problem is larger than unity. The

molar flux of oxygen toward the surface is smaller than if there were only pure Fickian diffusive

flux.

You should now finish the example. The steps are very similar to the Stefan tube problem. A

steady state shell balance of oxygen in the gas film should lead to dNO2/dz = 0 as in (E1-1). With

prescribed boundary concentrations (mole fractions), the integration steps are just like those in

Example 1.

- Equilibrium Staged Operations - SummaryЗагружено:dptsen
- Vapor in Air DiffusionЗагружено:Meet
- Diffusion CoatingЗагружено:hasan_waqar2004
- Unit Operation 2Загружено:Alyaa Awny
- DEHP Migration Behavior from Excessively Plasticized PVC SheetsЗагружено:hollandc07
- Lecture2 Diffusion SOLID STATEЗагружено:idownloadbooks3133
- KAPPA_DDA_book.pdfЗагружено:Franck Iparraguirre
- Microsoft Word - Corrosion SeminarOKЗагружено:Puneet Kaura
- Flujo Inducido Medio PorosoЗагружено:Francisca Ignacia Jure Bustamante
- DispersionЗагружено:Amin
- 699Загружено:weider11
- Vapour Diffusion Coefficient of AcetoneЗагружено:maf_oliveira
- sp-v2.2-ch4.pdfЗагружено:Abie Badhurahman
- A Principle of Mixing Similarity and Its Application to Inhomogeneous Combustion 1957Загружено:ricljr
- Respiration 2 2017Загружено:celine ched
- derived SCMЗагружено:keroroe
- Einstein Brownian05Загружено:Hungyi
- Microsoft Word - CAPITO_1Загружено:Aly Alina
- Modeling LiFePO4 CellЗагружено:labaryntos
- Latest UG Syllabus2008-2009(3rd Sem 2008-09)Загружено:SaiPraneeth
- Preparation for LessonЗагружено:DarioSp
- AntimonyЗагружено:vusi_zwe28
- VI.pdfЗагружено:Ed Gar Yunda
- Document (3) (2)Загружено:gjw1684
- V.I. Ilgisonis and I.V. Khalzov- Sufficient stability condition for axisymmetric equilibrium of flowing plasmaЗагружено:Olmnop

- Callen Thermodynamics SolutionЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Glassman - Combustion Chapter 1 ProblemsЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Navier StokesЗагружено:favargasce
- Kevorkian Cole Multiple Scale Singular Perturbation MethodsЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical ConferencesЗагружено:thersanders
- Report and Discussion for Ideal RamjetЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Gemini User ManualЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Wing Notes and Dimensions for designing a model airfraft wing (balsa wood structure)Загружено:piizexakly3
- Appendix B - Isentropic Flow TablesЗагружено:piizexakly3
- PEO-b-PDMSЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Free Vibration of Damped SystemsЗагружено:piizexakly3
- Fox 7th ISM Ch01Загружено:ratsate

- 00660884[1]Загружено:zohara
- data-collection and analysisЗагружено:api-253901565
- csc 216Загружено:FELIX PETER VOGAREMPI
- How to Write a ProgramЗагружено:Brian Beltran
- 14.EandIЗагружено:Saktheeswari Varman
- ModEvaRef2D EnЗагружено:boortek
- MATLAB based Image Editing and Color DetectionЗагружено:IJSRP ORG
- LogЗагружено:MazharYasin
- THERMODYNAMICS CHAPTER 4 SOLUTION MANUAL.Загружено:Naser Fernandez
- PrimaryЗагружено:damenzie
- Stress Concentrator in Rect PlateЗагружено:Sonam Behl Kamboj
- 1. Data Preparation.docxЗагружено:Aldo Addoodle
- Process CalculationsЗагружено:Isabel Justiniano Olivera
- Struct (C Programming Language)Загружено:karthikarajaratna
- DP BOM Modeling ExampleЗагружено:chong
- And 16Загружено:Tiara Qalbu Dhuafa
- Friendly AI VisionЗагружено:prabhavsharma
- AICO MHA Question AnswersЗагружено:Dinesh Kumar
- Ansys ExercisesЗагружено:Ruchit Solanki
- TorsionЗагружено:ayub
- L8-L9-Fixed Point Arithmetic MdfdЗагружено:Pritam Das
- Sampling DesignЗагружено:RomaYuliana
- DIGITAL PHYSICS SIMULATION OF LID-DRIVEN CAVITY FLOWЗагружено:Miguel Angel Escalante
- Changing OddsЗагружено:anthonylvc
- Registry of USG Recommended Biometric StandardsЗагружено:bonzo5
- Fracture Mechanics Practical FileЗагружено:subashish
- Hidden Markov Model - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaЗагружено:siinem
- Ejerciciosb.pdfЗагружено:apolo1711
- IEEE 5Загружено:Leonardo Zambrano
- Data Wrangling With SASЗагружено:Jose Evanan