Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Document 1401
Filed 10/09/16
Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff,
v.
AMMON BUNDY, et al,
Defendants.
In light of his recent testimony regarding the object of his plan being based in the
language of the Constitution, and for the purpose of resisting governmental usurpation of power,
Defendant Ammon Bundy requests that the Court consider the following modifications to the
Courts First Draft Final Jury Instructions, dated October 4, 2016.
1. Adding a sentence to the Courts instruction regarding Constitutionally Protected
Speech and Conduct, on page 19, to read:
The Constitution was written to be understood by ordinary citizens, and its words
and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical
meaning.
See D.C. v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 576 (2008) (quoting United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716,
731 (1931), and citing Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 188, 6 L.Ed. 23 (1824)).
2. Adding language to the Courts instruction regarding Right to Possess Firearms Under
the Second Amendment, on pages 20-21, so that it reads (new language in bold and
1
Case 3:16-cr-00051-BR
Document 1401
Filed 10/09/16
Page 2 of 2
underlined):
Under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution a person has the right to
keep and bear arms, that is to own, to possess, and to carry firearms, including for the
purpose of participating in a citizens militia, in case of confrontation, and for the
purpose of resisting tyranny and usurpations of power by the federal government. As
with First Amendment
See D.C. v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 592, 598, 618, 667-68 (2008).
DATED: October 8, 2016
/s/ Marcus R. Mumford
Marcus R. Mumford
J. Morgan Philpot
Attorneys for Ammon Bundy