1: Whether Corporation ALPHA should undertake an inclusive procurement

initiative
It is the fact that Different ways of establishment of strategies in the companies for
operating activities come from old time of Greeks. According to the report of the Bracker
(1980) the strategy of the world is the result of the studies by the Greek people and
those strategies were establishment in order to take more advantage over other
enemies. The main reasons for the establishment of strategies at that was to formulate
plan to defeat enemy. The Greeks developed those strategies mainly for success in war.
The context of the strategies were used for the purpose of wars till 19 th century, after
that that concept was used for businesses. The many of the writers have considered the
actual concept of context untraceable (Bracker, 1980; Chandler, 1962). This concept
was further explained by Chandler (1962) that the use of the strategies for the operating
activities of organizations was basically based on the needs and opportunity level of the
organizations. With passage of time, the changing environment in regard of populations,
development of technological ways and different methods for generating revenue
developed the need of implementation of strategies in the organizations (Keefer and
Stone, 2009).
In addition to this the report presented by Hoskin (1990) also explained the same
concept given by Chandler that the reason behind the need of strategies was due to the
changing environment of organizations in conduction of operations. The report of the
Hoskin considered some problems in this context in comparison to both Chandler and
Bracker on the basis of two important factors. First factor which he provided that there is
very small similarities between the concepts of strategies used in wars and use of
strategies in operations of modern organizations. Second factor which he considered
was that the untraceably of strategies of businesses is not true. When at that time
Hoskin started investigation then he found some level of resemblances of strategies to
wars but not much as provided by other two (Jrgensen and Keller,2008)
Comprehensive obtaining involves the expansion of common individuality that pools
these 3 elements at a single point. Establishing an association arrangement that is not

too varied and presenting proceedings that deliver a place for the public would empower
Alpha companions to link with and learn from each other and be accessible to knowhow relating to comprehensive finding. Inserting this knowledge in their exercise and
increasing capabilities would also be affected by exterior features, for example the
alignment of their association as to contractor variety. Alpha should want to assume this
finding creativity as supply chain management tools, trends and creativities have
advanced promptly as companies struggle to careful better worth from interactions with
clients and dealers. Some latest trends that have obstructed the insertion of variety
suppliers in supply chains include:
(a) Strategic sourcing
(b) Improvements in technology, e-sourcing and e-procurement
(c) Strategic partnerships and unions and
(d) Subcontracting (Joyce and Woods, 2001).
The strategies which were implemented by the organizations for adding the values to
the sources of development of strategies, supply chain management, and agreements
of strategies have not much effective results for the variety of suppliers. All the
strategies regarding the supply chain context can lead the suppliers to get an edge in
competitive environment. Comprehensive finding includes two serious elements. The
first element is related with demand factor and it link with the prime research question of
this study. It includes events directed at development a solid public of exercise, by a
strong individuality, inside which Alpha may progress capabilities linking to complete
finding. Furthermore, it is assumed that placing onward a bombast which relatives
administrative purposes with provider variety and assertive for a strong program,
thought-out achievement strategies and decided valuation outlines, are all influential
structures. Importantly, the extent to which Alpha develop competences relating to
inclusive procurement is predicated on intra-organizational factors that influence the
effectiveness of their identity. Mainly, it depends on the degree to which senior
management, organizational culture and other functions systematically support inclusive
finding strategies and practices (Adobor and McMullen, 2007),

How Corporation ALPHA could go about inclusive procurement and supplier

diversity, considering potential driving and constraining forces
It is the fact that every company cannot be successful without the help of other
companies and healthy relationship with the customers, people, shareholders and other
stakeholders of company. The objectives are set by management of very company on
the basis of which, all the operating activities of company depend. The objectives and
goals of each company are similar in some way to other companies in the market. In
modern time the nature of the businesses is changing rapidly (Pfeffer 1992). The
companies are making changes in the operations due to effective changes in respect of
social, political, economic, technology, and legal environment forces. These forces can
force the companies to change their management policies regarding production of
products, management of employees aspects, gaining of competitive advantage over
other companies, hurdles facing by company in regard of economy etc. the change
according to needs of modern time is very important for the success of company.
Following are some of the factors on the basis of which the changes in organizations
are required
Technology: rapid enhancement in technology force the companies to implement new
technological ways for the operation of company, the use of new technological tools in
the production process can enhance the productivity of companies (Contu and Willmot
2000).
Marketing conditions: there is a great competition in market of every industry, so this
is the reason that the evaluation of the market is very important for the success of
company. There are two basic factors which can affect the competitive advantage of
company over other company in the market. The first factor is the presence of other
companies producing the products of similar quality and second factor is that
purchasing of products by purchasers are not strong. The changes come in any of the
two factors can force the companies to make changes accordingly (Bensoussan, BE
and Fleisher, 2008).
.Social changes: the perception of purchasing of people, the needs of the people and
changing working style are the factors consider as the reason of social changes in the

business environment. There are many reasons behind the changes in social aspects
and these reasons include level of learning, development, sensation of independence,
and global influence because of different data foundations. The response of the
employees of company also changes due to these social factors (Brown, 1998)
Political and legal changes: these are those factors which directly linked with the
government. These factors include those requirements which are implemented by the
governmental bodies and the fulfillment of which are very important for the companys
success (Whittington, 2001)
The concept of diversity in context of organizations can be taken in different ways. In
modern time there are many types of companies operating in different areas of the
world and these organizations have different sized and different operational structure.
There are many sources are available for companies to raise finance for the business
operations of company. The operations of companies are performed by different
categories of employees having different culture, religion and different ages. The
concept of diversity can provided opportunities to organization. The diversity of
suppliers in regard of supply chain is a start by keeping in mid the objective to increase
the number of suppliers of company (Ram and Smallbone).

References:
1. Whittington, R (2001) What Is Strategy and Does it Matter? (2nd edition).
Thomson Learning: London.
2. Mintzberg, H, Ahlstrand, B and Lampel, J (1998) Strategy Safari. Prentice Hall:
Hemel Hempstead.
3. Brown, A (1998) Organisational Culture (2nd edition). Financial Times Pitman:
London.
4. Pfeffer, J (1992) Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations.
Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA.
5. Bensoussan, BE and Fleisher, CS (2008) Analysis without Paralysis: 10 Tools to
Make Better Strategic Decisions. Financial Times Prentice Hall: Harlow.
6. Grant, RM (2007) Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques and
Applications (4th edition). Blackwell: Oxford.
7. Joyce, P and Woods, A (2001) Strategic Management: A Fresh Approach to
Developing Skills, Knowledge and Creativity. Kogan Page: London.
8. Jrgensen, K.M., and Keller, H.D. (2008), The Contribution of Communities of
Practice to Human Resource Development: Learning as Negotiating Identity,
Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 4, 525 540.
9. Keefer, J.M., and Stone, S.J. (2009), Practitioner Perspectives on the Gap
between Research and Practice: What Gap? Advances in Developing Human
Resources, 11, 4, 454 471.
10. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Snyder, W.M. (2002), Cultivating Communities
of Practice, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Whitfield, G., and Landeros, R. (2006), Supplier Diversity Effectiveness: Does
Organizational Culture Really Matter? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42,
16 28.
12. Cabrera, E.F., and Cabrera, A. (2005), Fostering Knowledge Sharing Through
People Management Practices, The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 16, 5, 720 735
13. Adobor, H., and McMullen, R. (2007), Supplier Diversity and Supply Chain
Management: A Strategic Approach, Business Horizons, 50, 219229.

14. Contu, A., and Willmot, H. (2000), Comment on Wenger and Yanow. Knowing in
Practice: A Delicate Flower in the Organizational Learning Field, Organization,
7, 2, 269 276.
15. Keefer, J.M., and Stone, S.J. (2009), Practitioner Perspectives on the Gap

between Research and Practice: What Gap? Advances in Developing Human

Resources, 11, 4, 454 471.