Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Eugene Feinberg
Department of Applied Mathematics & Statistics
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Eugene.Feinberg@Sunysb.Edu
ENERGY 2012, March 25, 2012
St. Maarten
1
Distribution
optimization
Demand
management
2
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
400
350
300
MW
250
200
150
100
50
0
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Hours
Source: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS.
Power losses
http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=105&t=3
http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot271.nsf/veritydisplay/b17d1b6
a2ae42b32c125762d004733b7/$file/33-37%203m982_eng72dpi.pdf
10
Smart
Grid
Other New and
Improved
Technologies
Customer
Participation
11
12
13
14
16
17
19
20
21
Fuel economy
Emission reduction
Fuel cost saving
Energy security reduce U.S. reliance on imported oil
24
25
26
Decision variables
Objectives
Constraints
27
Reliability
Cost
28
30
31
Generation optimization
economic dispatch
32
Determine
Objective
Minimize Cost
Fuel+ O&M+ Startup/Shutdown
Risk (Probabilistic)
Constraints
34
Mathematical Formulation
Objective function
Im
(F
m 1 im 1 t 1
M
Im
(R
Im
( p m , im , t ) S m , im , t ( z m , im , t ))
Generation Costs
m 1 im 1 t 1
M
m , im , t
m , im , t
( rm , im , t ))
(C R eg
m 1 im 1 t 1
m , im , t
( reg m , im , t ))
pm ,im ,t
zm,im ,t
Fm ,im ,t
S m ,im ,t
Rm,im ,t
35
Mathematical Formulation
Constraints
Load balance
IM
( p w ) d
Ancillary service requirements
m 1 im 1
m ,t
m j im 1
m ,im ,t
j , t
Regulation requirement:
M
Im
reg
m ,t
i ,im ,t
Transmission constraints
m 1 im 1
m ,im , t
Regt
36
Im
Im
m 1
m 1
m 1 im 1
Im
Im
m 1
m 1
m 1 im 1
Im
m 1 im 1
p m , im , t
Im
m 1 im 1
m , im , t
d
m 1
m 1
z
m ,t
T m 1
m ,t
Update the reserve constraints, and solve the unit commitment problem with
respect to the next T time periods
37
37
Heuristic methods
Mixed integer programming
Benders decomposition
Dynamic programming
Lagrangian relaxation
Utilization of parallel computing
38
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 2
Unit 1
6AM
6PM
6AM
39
Unit 4
Unit 4
Unit 4
Unit 4
Unit 4
Unit 3
Unit 3
Unit 3
Unit 3
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 4
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 2
Unit 1
Unit 1
Unit 1
Unit 1
Unit 1
Unit 1
Unit 1
40
41
Optimal placement of DG
Optimal placement of DG
Objectives include
44
Transmission optimization
Transmission optimization
faster power flow solver
47
48
Distribution optimization
Voltage control
Feeder configuration
Phase balancing
49
Voltage control
50
51
54
55
Model formulation
min G :
h 0
2
|
I
|
Ri C S h
i 1 i , h
56
56
Feeder reconfiguration
solution approaches
A Numerical Example
3 feeders, 30 load points, and 32 switches with 30 and
31 being tie switches
58
58
A Numerical Example
Test case I: hourly load forecast on all sections follow a
normal distribution N(L(h), 490000kw2)
59
59
A Numerical Example
Test case II: hourly load forecast on all sections follow a
normal distribution N(L(h), 360000kw2)
60
60
Phase balancing
61
End-use optimization
Load forecasting
Demand management
Load shifting
62
64
Medium forecasts
(a month up to a year)
65
66
Given a model:
71
71
Load forecasting
performance measures
Performance Measures
Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)
1
MAPE
N
| yt Ft |
,
yt
i 1
n
1
MAD
N
| y F |.
t
i 1
72
Demand management
75
Conclusions
76