Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
May 2012
Publication No:
Issue:
Release:
Author(s):
Reviewer(s):
Document History
Issue
Date
May 2012
Purpose
First publication, in the framework of the Good Practice Guide
Disclaimer
While this publication has been prepared with care, European Copper Institute and other contributors provide
no warranty with regards to the content and shall not be liable for any direct, incidental or consequential
damages that may result from the use of the information or the data contained.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date: May 2012
Page i
CONTENTS
Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 1
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 2
Advantages of automation technologies ........................................................................................................ 2
EN 15232 BAC classifications and factors: from paper to practice ................................................................... 4
Energy Efficiency Classes for Building Automation and Control Systems............................................................... 4
Automation functions ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Temperature control ................................................................................................................................ 5
Lighting ..................................................................................................................................................... 6
Drives and motors .................................................................................................................................... 6
Technical alarms and power management .............................................................................................. 7
Remote control......................................................................................................................................... 7
Starting from a building energy audit ..................................................................................................................... 7
Calculating BACS Efficiency: Comparison of the Detailed and BAC-Factors Methods ............................................ 7
Method of BAC efficiency factors ............................................................................................................. 8
Detailed calculation method .................................................................................................................. 10
Financial Assessment of Building Automation Projects ........................................................................................ 10
Standard EN 15232 and the EPBD ................................................................................................................. 10
Conclusions................................................................................................................................................... 15
References .................................................................................................................................................... 15
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date: May 2012
Page ii
SUMMARY
Automation, control, and supervision systems can have a significant impact on the energy consumption of
buildings and their occupants, reducing it by 10, 20, or even more than 50 percent. In recognition of that fact
and to encourage implementation of these systems, the European Committee for Standardization issued EN
15232 Standard: Energy Performance of Buildings Impact of Building Automation, Controls, and Building
Management for use in conjunction with their Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). These
documents define conventions and methods for estimating the impact of building automation and control
systems (BACS) on the energy performance of building.
Focusing on EN 15232, in this paper, we present an overview of BACS, highlighting the advantages they can
provide and describing the primary functions they can perform. Because a building energy audit is the first
step in developing any energy management program, we describe the three different levels of complexity of
such an audit before tackling the details of the EN 15232 BACS classification system and looking at some
examples of BACS implementation schemes.
The actual savings in both energy usage and costs that a BACS can provide is of primary interest to building
managers and owners as well as BACS system designers. We describe the two calculation methods presented
within the Standard: the simple Method of Efficiency Factors, useful for obtaining a quick estimate, and the
more rigorous Detailed Calculation method, which returns a more accurate result but requires much more
information and effort. We also examine two different procedures for evaluating the costs associated with a
BACS: the Payback method and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis.
Finally, we explore how the methods and classification system of EN 15232 work with those of the EPBD.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 1
INTRODUCTION
Several recent studies have shown that despite the focus of European policies on energy efficiency, energy
consumption in European buildings continues to increase, leading to increases in both energy expenditures
and environmental pressures. Although the environmental and economic impact of appliances, HVAC systems,
and office equipment appear minor when compared with production activities, together the millions of
buildings in Europe make a significant contribution to the EUs total energy consumption.
May 2012
Page 2
return energy savings of between 10 and 30 percent; the savings can be even greater in older or poorly
maintained structures.
A BACS can be particularly valuable in buildings where other energy efficiency measures cannot be
implemented. Regulations preclude many historical buildings from envelope changes or invasive measures. For
these buildings, a BACS employing wireless technologies may be the only means to achieve significant energy
savings. Considering the age of the European building stock (see Figure 2) and the number of protected
historical buildings, the potential impact of building automation systems is clear.
Integrate new functionalities and new components, such as sensors and new optimization algorithms.
Expand and enhance the system as additional funding becomes available. A system may be designed
to perform basic functions at first and later modified to incorporate functions that are more
sophisticated.
Building automation systems offer additional advantages when integrated with renewable energy sources.
There are two important constraints to the energy available through small-scale renewables: the space
available for the installation and the energy available from the source over time, which frequently does not
align with human behavior. For example, the energy available from a photovoltaic system is limited not only by
size of the area available for installation, but also by the time of day and the weather. With no feasible ways to
increase the size of the installation, only a reduction in demand can improve the buildings energy
performance.
On the other hand, however, a BAS capable of load and power supply control can balance energy demands
with the availability of the renewable energy, automatically shifting some consumption without interfering
with the habits of building occupants. Building automation ensures that renewable systems are integrated,
controlled, and regulated optimally within the overall building systems.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 3
Finally, in contrast to traditional structural measures to improve energy efficiency, building automation can be
extended to domestic appliance management. Many modern appliances have digital controls and can be
interconnected with relative ease. This allows the development of integrated home automation networks that
give users increased flexibility and control over appliance operation and reduces their energy consumption.
In addition to the advantages offered by individual BACS, the standardization of these systems, such as that
promoted by EN 15232, offers several more, including:
-
Interoperability: Standardization ensures that the products of different manufacturers used in different
applications can operate and communicate with each other.
Product quality: Specific product standards define verified energy performance criteria and assure users
of product characteristics and quality.
Choice of Manufacturers: Standardization helps ensure that there will be more than one manufacturer of
the parts and equipment required for each functionality.
A list of control, automation, and technical management functions that affect the energy
performance of buildings
A method for defining the minimum requirements for the control, automation, and technical building
management functions implemented in different types of buildings
Detailed procedures for quantifying the impact these functions have on the energy performance of a
building
A simplified method to obtain an initial estimate of the impact these functions have on the energy
performance of buildings
The methods and procedures described within EN 15232 are based on a system of energy classifications
assigned to the various BACS functions. This section describes this classification system and how it can be used
to calculate the improvement in building energy performance and costs resulting from the implementation of
BAC functionality.
Class D Non-energy Efficient: corresponds to traditional and technical systems that provide no
automation or energy-efficiency
Class C Standard: corresponds to standard automation systems and normal controls. Class C is
considered the reference class
Class B Advanced: corresponds to advanced automation and control systems and some Technical
Building Management (TBM) functions for centralized control
Class A High Energy Performance: corresponds to systems similar to those of Class B but with levels
of accuracy and completeness that ensure high energy performance
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 4
A building with a Class C designation must have a specified set of basic (Class C) automation and control
functions. A Class B building must have all of the functions required for Class C plus some additional, higher
level functions, such as room controllers able to communicate with the building central control. A Class A
designation requires some specific features of TBM in addition to all of the Class B functions.
AUTOMATION FUNCTIONS
EN 15232 lists the energy efficiency and processing functions of building automation and control systems
based on models for specific building types and assigns a BAC classification to each. We must note, however,
that the first edition of EN 15232 (2007) does not cover all of the available BAC functions, and that some
functions listed remain unclear. With that understanding, the following paragraphs introduce the most
important automation functions available and summarize their underlying concepts.
TEMPERATURE CONTROL
Limiting heating or cooling periods and climate conditions to actual needs leads to significant reductions in
energy requirements in the residential sector as well as the tertiary sector. The most important automation
functions useful in reducing consumption related to temperature control include the following:
1.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 5
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Indoor air quality (IAQ) control: Rather than running the air exchange system periodically, a sensor
analyzes air quality and activates the air exchange system only when the air becomes stale.
Air exchange scheduling: Execute air exchanges at times when outdoor temperatures are less cold in
winter and less hot in summer to avoid the extreme temperature gradients that lead to excessive
losses.
Weather station/temperature control integration: Integrating temperature control with a weather
station that monitors rain, wind, and brightness can allow automatic deployment of awnings, blinds,
outdoor lighting, and irrigation to mitigate energy losses.
Occupancy-based climate control: Automatic adjustment of indoor climate conditions according to
occupancy or time of day and upon the opening and closing of doors or windows.
Frost protection in zones with occasional occupancy: Automated frost protection in rooms or zones
only occupied occasionally protects furniture and equipment.
Allowance for manual switching: Allows for local or centralized changes from automatic to manual
switching between different comfort modes (Comfort. Pre-comfort, Economy or Off).
LIGHTING
Automated controls that limit the operation and intensity of artificial lighting can have a significant impact on
electricity consumption, particularly in the service sector. Available lighting control systems and equipment
have evolved rapidly in recent years and today offer functionality that goes far beyond simple timer-based
on/off control. Sensors that detect ambient light levels, occupancy/vacancy, or motion can be programmed to
application-specific set points to actuate a wide range of functions, including:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Track the hours of operation for each appliance to optimize maintenance scheduling
Report the state of service of individual devices or groups of devices
Enable replication of individual and group command points to increase the ability of humans to take
effective manual actions
2.
Window shutters and awnings. Motorized shutter and awning operation can be either timed or
associated with specific scenarios. All can be operated by remote controls, light sensors, or weather
stations.
Venetian blind operation: A drive can move the blades of Venetian blinds up and down and adjust
them to different angles according to the position of the sun. Angling the blades to deflect direct
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 6
3.
4.
sunlight can reduce the need for air conditioning in summer and provide glare protection for
workstation screens.
Irrigation systems: Drives can open and close water valves according to a programmed schedule.
Systems can also incorporate sunlight sensors to avoid operation during rain, thereby saving water
and protecting plants from overwatering.
Pool management systems: Pool pump, filtration, and cleaning systems all incorporate motors that
can be integrated with the BACS.
Hazardous gas, fire and flood detectors, integrated with the actuation of solenoid gas and water
valves
Adverse weather detection, integrated with controlled shading devices
Actuators integrated with electrical outlets enable selected loads to be switched off, eliminating the
consumption of appliances in stand-by mode without turning off loads that require uninterrupted
power
REMOTE CONTROL
Using remote controls to manage the functions of systems can lead to a decrease in energy consumption by
allowing direct human intervention if an unexpected situation warrants it. The ability to intervene directly
during one of these unexpected conditions at the outset of the problem prevents operation of the system
during times that are potentially characterized by low efficiency and high-energy losses.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 7
The method using BAC efficiency factors provides reasonable estimates based on coefficients calculated from
actual measurements that were performed on buildings representing many different types and for rooms with
different boundary conditions. It is particularly useful in the initial phases of a project.The BAC factors method
allows one to quickly assess the impact on energy consumption of implementing a BACS and provides direct
evidence of the economic value of adopting a given level of automation, control, or supervision. It can apply to
residential buildings as well as offices, libraries, schools, hospitals, hotels, restaurants, malls, and shops.
The detailed calculation method can be applied only with comprehensive information on the building and
proposed systems. This method returns a result with higher accuracy, but it requires a much greater depth of
knowledge and much greater effort.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 8
(From EN 15232.)
Table 2 illustrates how to calculate the percentage of energy savings could be achieved by implementing Class
B and Class A automation functions in a Class C office and residence. For example, automating the cooling in a
Class C office to the Class B level will result in a 20% reduction in energy consumption; upgrading to Class A
functions increases these savings to 30%.
Table 1 Percentage of thermal savings achievable by adopting automation systems with reference to Class C.
Office
Residence
Class
Savings
Class
Savings
Although EN15232 sets Class C as the reference class, many buildings fall into Class D. Setting Class D as the
reference class, a similar calculation shows that upgrading an office with no automation, control, or
supervision to Class A will result in a 54% reduction in energy consumption.
Although EN15232 sets Class C as the reference class, many buildings fall into Class D. To calculate the
potential energy savings achievable by implementing a BACS in a Class D building, use the applicable reduction
factor (k) as illustrated in Table 3. For example, multiplying the Class C-based efficiency factor for a residential
building by the reduction factor (ka) shows that upgrading this building from Class D to Class A could achieve a
0.81 * 0.736 = 59.6% reduction in thermal energy consumption.
Table 2 The reduction factor k to switch from Class C to Class D as a reference, for residential buildings
Thermal energy
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
kc
fBACc/fBACd
0.909
kb
fBACb/fBACd
0.800
ka
fBACa/fBACd
0.736
Page 9
Electrical Energy
kc
fBACc/fBACd
0.926
kb
fBACb/fBACd
0.861
ka
fBACa/fBACd
0.852
Using the method of the efficiency factors at an early stage of a building automation project can be useful, and
it does not preclude subsequent detailed calculations during later stages to obtain a more accurate estimation.
3.
4.
5.
Direct method: Based on simulation of the system in accordance with EN 13790 "Thermal
performance of buildings - Calculation of energy use for space heating and cooling"
Method based on mode of operation: Considers the different states of an application on which a
control acts, such as fan on/fan off for an HVAC system. The energy consumption is calculated for
each state and summed to yield the total consumption of the application.
Method based on the time of operation: Considers the duration of operation and a ratio that
characterizes the function in question
Method based on room temperature: Used in cases where the control system affects room
temperature
Method of correction coefficients: Used when the automatic control acts on the basis of multiple
factors, such as time, occupancy, and temperature.
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 10
A common methodology for calculating the integrated energy performance of buildings. This
methodology takes into account not just the quality of the building's insulation, but also all of the
other factors that contribute to energy efficiency.
Minimum standards for the energy performance of both new buildings and existing buildings that are
subject to major renovation
Procedures for the energy certification of new and existing buildings and for public buildings. The
Directive calls for prominent display of this certification and other relevant information. Certificates
must be less than five years old.
Regular inspection of boilers and central air-conditioning systems in buildings and an assessment of
heating installations in which the boilers are more than 15 years old.
The integrated approach of the EPBD takes into account all building systems, including heating and cooling
installations, lighting installations, the position and orientation of the building, and heat recovery systems.
The EN 15232 methodology provides a valuable tool for evaluating and improving building energy
performance according to the EPBD classification scheme. Of course, EPBD classification criteria vary
depending on the country of implementation. The example described here refers to the Italian classification
scheme, but the approach can be applied universally.
The EPBD classification scheme is based on:
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
30 kWh/m a
50 kWh/m a
70 kWh/m a
90 kWh/m a
120 kWh/m a
160 kWh/m a
Page 11
The calculations are based on existing system and envelope technologies without explicitly taking into account
any potential for efficiency improvements through building automation technologies. However, after
calculating the energy demand, the application of BAC factors allows immediately evaluation of the impact
automation could have on energy demand and consumption. In practice, one can immediately estimate the
improvement in a buildings EPBD classification resulting from implementation of a BACS by applying the
applicable BAC efficiency factor.
Table 5 shows the application of EN 15232 BAC factors to EPBD classes for different building types according to
the Italian implementation of the directive. For the purposes of these calculations, we assumed that the
electrical energy demand for HVAC auxiliary systems in a building without ventilation accounts for
approximately 13% of the total energy demand.
For each building type, the calculations assume EN 15232 Class C as the starting point and a total Energy
Demand (ED) as follows:
2
EPBD Class B :
40 kWh/m y
EPBD Class C:
60 kWh/m2y
EPBD Class D:
80 kWh/m2y
EPBD Class E:
105 kWh/m2y
EPBD Class F:
140 kWh/m2y
The calculations in Table 5 show that, depending on the initial total energy demand, the application of an EN
15232 BAC factor can often improve the EPBD class. When the adoption of the automation system
corresponds to an improvement in the EPBD class of a building, Table 13 displays the new class in boldface.
Note that in some cases, the EN 15232 Class B BAC factor suffices to improve the EPBD building classification;
in other cases, it is not possible to improve the classification at all, even with the Class A BAC factor.
The simplicity of this approach suggests that the EPBD should include BAC factor usage formally and explicitly
in its building energy demand calculation methodology.
Table 5 Application of EN 15232 BAC factors to EPBD classes for different building types (with reference to the
Italian implementation of the directive).
Automation class
EN 15232 Class A
EPBD Class
ED (kWh/m2y)
EPBD class
ED (kWh/m2y)
EPBD class
40
33
29
60
49
43
80
65
58
105
86
76
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
EN 15232 Class B
ED (kWh/m2y)
Offices
Building type
EN 15232 Class C
May 2012
Page 12
Automation class
EN 15232 Class A
EPBD Class
ED (kWh/m2y)
EPBD class
ED (kWh/m2y)
EPBD class
140
114
101
40
31
22
60
46
33
80
62
44
105
81
58
140
108
77
40
35
32
60
53
48
80
71
65
105
93
85
140
124
113
40
37
35
60
55
52
80
74
70
105
97
92
140
129
122
40
35
28
60
52
43
80
69
57
105
91
74
140
121
99
40
32
28
60
48
43
80
64
57
105
83
75
140
111
100
40
30
26
60
46
38
EN 15232 Class B
ED (kWh/m2y)
Lecture hall
Building type
EN 15232 Class C
May 2012
Page 13
Automation class
EN 15232 Class A
EPBD Class
ED (kWh/m2y)
EPBD class
ED (kWh/m2y)
EPBD class
80
61
51
105
80
67
140
106
90
40
35
33
60
53
49
80
71
66
105
93
87
140
124
115
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
EN 15232 Class B
ED (kWh/m2y)
Residential
Building type
EN 15232 Class C
May 2012
Page 14
CONCLUSIONS
It is clear that building automation and control systems can provide significant saving in both energy usage and
expenditures. The EN 15232 Standard provides conventions and tools for assessing those savings and
evaluating potential BACS implementations.
EN 15232 introduces a four-level (A - D) system for classifying buildings according to the level of their BACS and
a corresponding classification to various levels of each BACS function. It assigns an efficiency factor to each
building classification for each building type, with different factors applying to thermal and electrical energy.
The relatively simple Method of BAC Efficiency Factors for calculating energy savings uses these factors to
return a quick estimate of the savings that can be expected by upgrading (or implementing) a BACS from, for
example, Class C to Class A. This method is particularly useful in the early stages of developing the BACS. The
Detailed Calculation Method returns a much more accurate estimate, but requires much more and quantified
information about the building systems before and after BACS implementation or upgrade.
The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive incorporates a methodology for classifying the energy efficiency
of buildings based on their energy demand. By applying an EN15232 BAC efficiency factor to the energy
demand rating of a particular EPBD class, one can easily determine the improvement in EPBD class that will
result from implementing or upgrading a Building Automation and Control System (see table 13). Together, the
EPBD and EN 15232 provide a comprehensive set of tools, classification schemes, and guidelines for planning
and assessing the impact of implementing and upgrading building automation and control systems.
REFERENCES
[1] UNI EN 15232 Energy Performance of Buildings Impact of Building Automation, Control, and Building
Management.
[2] GREENBUILDING PROGRAMME Energy audit guidelines, 2005.
[3] DIRECTIVE 2002/91/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2002 on
the energy performance of buildings.
[4] DIRECTIVE 2010/31/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 19 May 2010 on the
energy performance of buildings (recast).
[5] A. Baggini, A. Marra, Efficacia energetica degli edifice, Editoriale Delfino 2010.
[6] Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings. Intelligent Energy Europe 2011.
[7] Direttiva tecnica Casa Clima 2011.
[8] F. Klinchenberg and M. Sunikka, Better Building through Energy Efficiency A Roadmap for Europe, Eurima,
Meerssen, The Netherlands, 2006
[9] Europes buildings under the microscope - Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), 2011
[10] Building Renovation and Modernization in Europe: State of the art review ERABUILD, 2006
Publication No Cu0163
Issue Date:
May 2012
Page 15