IIIIIIndi

Individual Performance Commitment

And Review Form
Name of Employee:
Tapar
Position:
PRINCIPAL 1
Review Period:

GENEROSO Q. QUILLOPO

Name of Rater :

TEACHER 1

Position:
Date of Review:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING THE PLANNING

MFQs

KRAs
1. Teaching
Learning
Process

Carolina A.

OBJECTIVES
Prepared well
structured daily lesson
plan
(20%)

Utilized well prepared

instructional materials
relevant to the teaching
and learning process
(10%)

Weigh
t
per
KRA
40%

To Be Filled During Evaluation

Performance Indicators

Quality
5- Prepared 180 well
structured lesson plan
with 90% and above level
of mastery
4- Prepared 180 well
structured lesson plan
with 85-89 % level of
mastery
3- Prepared 180 well
structured lesson plan
with 80-84% level of
mastery
2-prepared i70 lesson
plans.
1-prepared 160 lesson
plans
5- Utilized innovations in
the delivery of the lesson
4- Programmed lesson

Efficiency

5- Achieved 90%
and above mastery
level
4- Achieved 85-89%
mastery level
3- Achieved 80-84%
mastery of the lesson
2- Achieved 75-79%

Ratin
g
Timeliness

SCO
RE

utilizing the ICT

3- Presented well
prepared instructional
materials relevant in the
delivery of the lesson
2-Showed traditional
teaching materials
1- utilized chalk talk style

Assessed Teaching and

learning outcomes
through
formative/summative
and periodic test
(10%)

2.Pupils/Stu
dent
Outcomes

Prepared tools to
monitor the pupils
progress
(10%)

5- Utilized intervention
plans that is relevant to
uplift pupils performance
4- prepared graphical
representation/portfolio to
assess the learning
outcomes of the pupils
3- Constructed the
required number of
formative/summative and
periodical test necessary
to assess the learning
outcomes
2-accomplished
insufficient number of
tools necessary in the
assessment of learning
outcome
1-showed inconsistencies
in preparing assessment
tool
30%

5- Updated and prepared

all tools in evaluating
pupils progress and met
10% and above the

mastery of the lesson

1-Reteached the
lesson due to the low
mastery
5- Conducted
remediation to 100%
of the pupils who got
below 75% mastery
of the tests
4- conducted
remediation to 90%
of the pupils who got
below 75% mastery
of the tests
3- Prepared 100% of
the tools necessary
to assess learning
outcomes
2. Prepared 90% of
the tools
1- prepared 70% of
the tools

Increased the
comprehension and
reading level at least
75% of the 49 pupils in
English and Filipino
(10%)

Trained pupils who will

participate in the

specified target across

learning areas
4- Updated and prepared
all the tools in evaluating
pupils progress and met
5-9% above the specified
target
3-Completed and updated
all the tools in evaluating
pupils progress and met
2% above the target in all
learning areas
2-Updated and
constructed insufficient
number of monitoring
tools
1-Accomplished an
insufficient and unupdated monitoring tools
5- Conducted phil-Iri and
interventions to the pupils
at the frustration level
4- Conducted phil-Iri and
prepared intervention
plan to the pupils who are
at frustration reading
level
3-conducted Phil-iri in
English and Filipino
2-prepared insufficient
tool in monitoring the
reading level of pupils
1.has not conducted philiri

5. !00% of the pupils

are classified as
independent reader
4. 80-99% of the
pupils are
independent readers
3. 0 frustration was
recorded and 100%
passing rate was
noted
2. 10% of the pupils
were frustration
readers
1. 20% and above of
the pupils were
frustration readers

5. Conducted year
round trainings
4. Started trainings
at the start of

Division Academic and

Non-Academic contests
(10%)

3.
Community
Involvement

Informed and discussed

with parents,
community and other
stakeholders regarding
the school rules and
policies (3%)

Informed parents
regarding learners
status and progress

10%

5-Participated in the
national Competitions
4-Participated in the
Regional Competitions
3-Trained pupils
participated in the
district/division level
competitions.
2-Trained pupils had no
division participation
1-Has not conducted
trainings
5-Acquired external
stakeholders to contribute
in the development and
improvement of the
school
4-Establihed an
organization that help in
the implementation of
school programs and
policies
3-Participated in a Parents
General assembly
2-Did not participate in
Parents general assembly
1-Did not inform the
parents, community and
other stakeholders the
school rules and poicies

5-Established 100%
information and

school year
3. conducted
trainings
4 months before
the
The competition
2. Trained month
before
1. Trained a week
before

5. Acquired 1
external stakeholder
to contribute in the
development and
improvement of the
school
4. established 1
organization that
help in the
implementation of
school programs and
policies
3. Noted 100%
attendance in the
parents general
assembly
2. participated 80%
of the parents
general assembly
1. has not
participated in all the
assemblies

5- Conducted at
least 6 meetings
with parents within
the school year
4- Conducted at

during conferences and

meetings
( 5%)

Conducted home
visitations to alleviate
pupils
performance/competenc
ies
(2%)

attendance of parents
during meetings and
conferences
4-Noted 90 to 99%
information and
attendance of parents
during meetings and
conferences
3-conducted regular
meetings with parents
and informed/ discussed
the learners progress and
met a 100% passing and
survival rate of the 49
pupils
2-Missed at least 1
periodic meeting
1-has no conducted
meetings
5-Noted a very high
parents and pupils
participation during
visitation that led to zero
drop-out rate
4-Achieved a very high
increased in performance
of the identified pupils
with academic and moral
deficiency
3-conducted a regular
home visit for the pupils
who are identified with
academic and moral
deficiency
2-Noted a zero increase

least 5 meetings
with parents within
the school year
3- Conducted
quarterly meetings
with parents
2- Conducted 2
meetings with
parents with in the
school year
1-Met with parents
only once within
the school year

5-100% of the pupils

at risk were visited
4- 80-99% of the
pupils with very low
performance were
visited
3-noted 100%
passing rate and 0%
dropout among the
49 pupils
2-recorded
1failed/dropout
1-1% of the class has
failed/dropped

4.Personal
Growth and
Developmen
t

Attended seminars and

workshops relevant to
the profession
(10%)

Increased teaching
competencies through
involvement in
continuing education
process
(5%)

Served as a
Discussant/resource

20%

on the performance of
identified pupils
1- Had not conducted a
home visit despite the
identification of academic
and moral deficient pupils
5-Attended
national/regional seminar
4-Served as a speaker in a
division seminar
3-Attended division
seminar
2-Attended school and
district seminars
1-has not attended any
seminar

5-Graduated in a Doctors
Degree
4- Graduated in a Masters
Degree with distinction
3-Enrolled in a Masters
degree
2-stopped in the
acquisition of additional
competencies
1-Earned zero unit in
Masters degree

5-Increased by 10%
above the target in
subjects taught
4-Increased by 5-9%
above the target in
subjects taught
3-Increased by 2%
above the target in
subjects taught
2-Noted a constant
percentage targets
1-Decreased below
the targets was
noted

speaker during school

base seminars or
workshops
( 5%)

5- Served as
regional/national speaker
in any educational
summit
4- served as speaker in a
division seminar
3- served as
discussant/resource
speaker in school
seminars /workshop
2-served as discussant
but with limited
knowledge about the
topic
1-Has not participated in
any seminar
Overall
Rating for
Accomplish
ments

CAROLINA A. TAPAR

GENEROSO

Q.QUILLOPO
Rater

Ratee