Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
MBO2029
Mel Barratt and Gerard
Schram
17 Pages
Published February, 2008
Revised September, 2012
2(17)
3(17)
4(17)
5(17)
Criteria for
occurrence
Remote probability.
Very unlikely to be
observed even only
once
Low probability. Likely
to occur once, but
unlikely to occur more
frequently.
Moderate probability.
Likely to occur more
than once.
High probability. Near
certain to occur at least
once.
Very high probability.
Near certain to occur
several times.
Rating
1
Failure
rate
0
2
3
1:20000
1:10000
4
5
6
7
8
1:2000
1:1000
1:200
1:100
1:20
9
10
1:10
1:2
6(17)
7(17)
Severity
value
1.0
0.7
0.4
4.1. Quantitative severity measures
Failure Effect
Probaility ""
1.00
0.1 1.00
0- 0.1
0
Description
A failure resulting in system
loss or high probability of
death or serious injury.
A failure that results in loss of
functionality or injury to the
operator.
A failure that results in
degraded performance.
8(17)
Class Health
Safety and
Environment
Production
High
Potential for
serious
personnel
injuries.
Either:
Total
production
stop
Render
safety critical
systems
inoperable.
or
Potential for
Cost
(exclusive of
production
loss)
Substantial
cost
(exceeding a
specified
amount).
Significant
reduced
rate of
production
9(17)
fire in
classified
areas.
Med
Potential for
major
pollution.
Potential for
injuries
requiring
medical
treatment.
exceeding
a specified
duration
within a
defined
period of
time.
Either:
Total
production
stop
Moderate
cost
(between
specified
cost limits).
or
Limited
effect on
safety critical
systems.
No potential
for fire in
classified
areas.
Potential for
moderate
pollution.
Low
No potential
for injuries.
No Effect on
safety critical
systems.
No potential
for fire in
classified
areas.
No potential
for pollution.
Significant
reduced
rate of
production
lasting
less than a
specified
duration
within a
defined
period of
time.
No effect
on
production
within a
defined
period of
time.
Insignificant
cost (below a
specified
limit).
Criteria for
detectability
Remote probability
that the failure
mode remains
undetected.
Certainly detected
during inspection
or test.
Low probability
that the failure
mode remains
undetected.
Moderate
probability that
failure mode
remains
undetected.
High probability
that the failure
mode remains
undetected
Very high
probability that the
failure mode
remains
undetected until
the system
performance
degrades to the
extent that the
task will not be
completed.
Rating
1
Probability
(%)
86-100
2
3
76-85
66-75
4
5
6
56-65
46-55
36-45
7
8
26-35
16-25
9
10
6-15
0-5
10(17)
11(17)
6. Risk analysis
12(17)
13(17)
14(17)
7. Conclusions
15(17)
8. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Wayne
Reed, Brain Smith, Brian Murray, and Gene
Hughes for their contributions to the article.
9. References
[1] http://www.brittanica.com
[2] Glossary,
http://www.aptitudexchange.com
[3] McKenna, T. and Oliverson, R., Glossary
of Maintenance and Reliability Terms. Gulf
Publishing Company, ISBN 0-88415-3606 (1997).
[4] Glossary,
http://www.maintenanceresources.com
[5] U.S. Department of Defense, MIL STOP
1629A: Failure mode and effects analysis.
National Technical Information Services,
Springfield, Virginia, USA, 1998 (4th ed.).
[6] Norwegian Technology Centre, Pslo,
NORSOK Standard Z008, Criticality Analysis
for Maintenance Purposes.
http://www.nts.no/norsok
[7] British Standard BS 3811: Glossary of
Terms used in Terotechnology. 1993.
16(17)
10. Acronyms
ETA = Event Tree Analysis
FMEA = Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
FMECA = Failure Modes, Effects, and
Criticality Analysis
FTA = Fault Tree Analysis
HAZOPS = Hazard and Operability Study
HSE = Health, Safety, Environment
Criticality Analysis in Perspective
17(17)