Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ethnocentrism?
Several unconfined expressions attributed to individuals of gargantuan
profiles describe Nigeria more as a fiction than a nation. Whether true or
false, some of these expressions are permanent appellations by which the
country is defined. It is common to define Nigeria either as “a mere
geographical expression” or “a mistake of 1914”. Both expressions,
chronicled over 30 years ago by the founding fathers of the country (the
sagacious Chief Obafemi Awolowo and the Premier of Northern Nigeria, Sir
Ahmadu Bello respectively), have stuck as critical explanations for a failed
Nigerian state.
It would not be hard to deduce that, both Premiers made such shattering
comments about the health of the nation, having vehemently discussed and
severally disagreed on the values and virtues systems of the broadly
different people they led. Sir Michael Okpara, the Premier of the Eastern
Nigeria, however, could be considered as a more reserved personality, who
would improvise for necessities with availabilities. Rather than be entangled
in a “battle royale”, he chose an oblivious path of silence and allowed his
achievements speak the volumes. This does not state that he outperformed
his co-premiers. I just insinuate that he was utterly silent, unflappable and
visibly efficient. He, probably, either believed the Nigeria Project, or
concluded that, while collapse is imminent, do something immortal!
The ethnic incongruity of the big country, Nigeria, cannot be denied; either
by the amalgamation Lieutenants or the indigenous founding fathers. Also,
there had, obviously, always been perceived anachronistic and retarded
ethnocentric tendencies from which the destiny of a supposed young African
giant could be and eventually, was professed. These great cultural
differences always exist. And I have no doubts that they were the same
reasons Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Sir Ahmadu Bello, in spite of their global
outlook as Nationalists, made such “destiny-changing” pronouncements on
the future of the Country.
Times passed. Several other leaders emerged. Apart from those who were
slain to sustain the forced, but somewhat accepted, unity of Nigeria, others
exhibited massive traits of Ethnocentrism – the single obnoxious and
persistent destroyer of our politics and subsequently, our economic, social
and moral values. In the words of Late Ken Saro-Wiwa, he described
ethnocentrism as “the misuse of the ethnic groups and ethnic sentiments
against other ethnic groups in a sterile competition”.
It has always been argued that our strength lies in unity and that tribalism is
the bane of our nation. However, we have continually witnessed successive
governments with huge traits of ethnocentrism. A simple example is the
Federal Character. How else would you describe the institutionalization of the
Federal Character by the “maradonic” administration that would not be
monstrous except for hypocrites?
Imagine that Nigeria would never be able to present her best soccer team
(just 23 players) due to this horrible idea of the “evil genius”. If the Federal
Character had to be truly reflected in the Super Eagles, how would one as a
Technical Adviser share the limited squad spots among over 300 ethnic
groups that would not result into marginalization? Even the best rotational
algorithm will marginalize the weaker tribes. Federal Character, a
modernized expression of ethnocentrism, simply makes no sense!
How did IBB intended to foster National Unity with the institutionalization of
the Federal Character? How would I see a fellow northern citizen who gained
admission into the University at my expense with an inferior qualification just
because he is a northerner? Truly, this might sound perverse, but true
Education cannot be acquired through compulsion. Only the best students
should be offered the privileges of our limited educational resources in
tertiary Institutions. However, I hasten to add that, if like some other
countries of the world, the Federal Government could afford free education
for all at every level, then so be it.
Moreso, how else can a Political Party serve the country other than the
presentation of the best leadership that can be?
With perception, I have no doubts that majority of the victims of the Jos crisis
were Nigerian that emanated from alien tribes. In defense of this statement,
it would be wise that, the Federal Government produces genetic manifests of
the victims. Through iniquitous policies that brutally forced ethnical
coexistence, the Nigerian Government has disintegrated the nation more
than they have united it. Even if we are forced to live together, in our hearts
are seeds of discord and we know who our “true” brothers are in times of
crisis.
Professor Pat Utomi stressed the need to consciously militate against the
North-South dichotomy in his article – A message to the Youths. He
expressed optimism of (and in) a new country - One Nigeria; and he
encouraged the youths across the country to make people to people
connection and to learn from their colleagues from the other divide so that
they no longer see them as strangers, and worse off, enemies. In my humble
opinion, I think Professor Utomi did a great job dissecting the basis of
ethnocentric tendencies. However, while I do not expect an absolute
discourse, a vital omission of failed leadership did severe injustice to the
topic.
Rather than blame the unfortunate chronological leaderships that had
befallen this nation and had, in turn, undermined the oneness of the country,
he blamed parents for anxiously wanting to save their wards from the jaws of
a merciless and stanch predator! May I ask the number of promising Nigerian
Youths lost yearly to communal and religious crisis? May I also ask if
Professor Pat Utomi had ever lost a loved one to any of these crises? Did he
not hear of the atrocities of rape and murder perpetrated by the “Boko
Haram” evangelists?
Except for a refined NYSC that assures and reassures safety, I would not
allow any of my loved ones to serve in unsafe lands and this, completely, has
nothing to do with dichotomy or tribalism. It is a simple effort of parents to
provide for their wards, what Nigeria had failed to provide to any citizen
except the highly placed (the very most tribalised citizens) – Safety &
Security!
Dear reader, if you were in the hot-seat of Frank Edoho (MTN Who Wants to
be a Millionaire?) and you were asked “Which of the major tribes of Nigeria
dragged the country into her presently predicament of statelessness?” and
you were provided with 4 options namely A:Yoruba, B:Igbo, C:Hausa and
D:All of the above, what would be your answer? Let me guess for you. If you
are Yoruba, your answer is definitely Hausa. If you are Igbo, your answer
might also be Hausa. And if you are Hausa, I’d win a jackpot taking a guess
on Yoruba! Well, it is all in your opinion and because this is my game, you
are wrong! The answer is D – All of the above.
Now read Sanusi Lamido Sanusi’s comment on the book titled: “Nigeria,
Africa’s failed Asset?”.
My final submission is that we all (Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa and the other minority
tribes) have dragged Nigeria to her knees. So, in a unit of undaunted force,
we have to fight to bring back those lost glories. Nigeria is not about me or
you. It is about all of us. And if you would not put a hand in Nation Building,
dear reader, quit blackmailing the country. It is the only country that has
accepted us the way we are.