Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CITATIONS
READS
10
796
3 authors:
Emanuele Brunesi
Davide Bolognini
22 PUBLICATIONS 98 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Roberto Nascimbene
European Centre for Training and Rese
79 PUBLICATIONS 322 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 5 February 2013 / Accepted: 7 January 2014 / Published online: 28 January 2014
RILEM 2014
E. Brunesi (&)
ROSE Programme, UME School, IUSS Pavia, Pavia, Italy
e-mail: emanuele.brunesi@eucentre.it
URL: http://www.umeschool.it
D. Bolognini R. Nascimbene
European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake
Engineering (EUCENTRE), Pavia, Italy
e-mail: davide.bolognini@eucentre.it
URL: http://www.eucentre.it
R. Nascimbene
e-mail: roberto.nascimbene@eucentre.it
URL: http://www.eucentre.it
Shear span
Distance between two line loads
Ratio of distance from end of member
to transfer length
Area of lower strands
Area of upper strands (if present)
Sum of web widths
Cross-section depth, assumed as HS
Normalized depth
1504
Dlow
Dup
Dz
dp,low
dC50
E1
E3
Fz
fc
fC50,mean
fctd
ft
/
H
HH
HS
I
LF
Ls
Lt
Nlow
Nup
Ri
S
Slow
Sup
rcp
rp
rp0
rp0,low
rp0,up
tb
tlow
syz
Vobs
Vpre
x
x/D
2.5
200
265
320
370
400
500
Vobs = Vpre
Ri = Vobs / Vpre []
1.5
200
265
320
370
400
500
Vobs = Vpre
1.5
0.5
0.5
2.5
Ri = Vobs / Vpre []
1505
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
100
200
300
2.5
200
265
320
370
400
500
Vobs = Vpre
Ri = Vobs / Vpre []
1.5
0.5
500
600
700
800
2.5
200
265
320
370
400
500
Vobs = Vpre
Ri = Vobs / Vpre []
400
Vpre [kN]
Vpre [kN]
1.5
0.5
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Vpre [kN]
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Vpre [kN]
Fig. 1 ad Ri versus Vpre for each considered depth, according to EC2, Yangs approach, ACI and CSA, respectively
without transverse reinforcement, generally not feasible, can fail, due to web-shear cracking in the disturbed end regions, at loads less than those predicted by
conventional design methods.
Although PPHC slabs have been widely adopted,
some aspects of the commonly-used design approaches
against shear are still a cause of concern; short bearings
and not fully developed prestressing force influence
their response. Furthermore, their common production
system (i.e. extrusion) may result in features not
properly in agreement with those of the standard
concrete strength monitoring procedures. PPHC have
undergone extensive experimental tests [2, 8, 12, 21] to
verify their compliance with the provisions of traditional Codes and Standards and classify the possible
failure modes. Walraven and Mercx [21] also noticed
that the observed shear resistance was lower than the
1506
Fig. 2 Conceptual experimental test set up: details of wedges, rollers and examples of tested hollow core units (adapted from [13])
Table 1 Cases of study: model and slab type, nominal depth (H), number, diameter, area, initial prestress and largest slippage of
upper (Nup, Dup, Aup, rp0,up, Sup) and lower strands
Model
type
Slab
type
H
(mm)
Nup
()
Dup
(mm)
Aup
(mm2)
rp0,up
(MPa)
Sup
(mm)
Nlow
()
Dlow
(mm)
Alow
(mm2)
rp0,low
(MPa)
Slow
(mm)
200
Circular
200
265
Circular
265
12.5
93
1100
0.4
10
12.5
93
1100
320a
Non-circular
320
1.1
13
12.5
93
1100
320b
Non-circular
320
2.5
11
12.5
93
1000
320c
Circular
320
370
Non-circular
370
9.3
52
900
0.2
11
12.5
93
1000
0.6
12
12.5
93
1000
400a
Non-circular
400
0.6
13
12.5
93
1100
400b
Non-circular
1.3
400
13
12.5
93
1000
500
Non-circular
1.9
500
16
12.5
93
1000
0.8
1507
below hollow core (tlow), average distance from lower strand to
the soffit (dp,low), mean core strength (fC50,mean) and relative
standard deviation (dC50)
HS
(mm)
bw
(mm)
HH
(mm)
tlow
(mm)
dp,low
(mm)
fC50,mean
(MPa)
dC50
(MPa)
40
917
200
239
153
19
39
54.8
3.8
40
724
260
228
175
42
36
71.3
4.2
3810
3880
80
80
1,160
760
315
321
309
289
222
216
38
36
43
38
61.8
64.3
2.4
2.6
5,945
3100
40
826
310
263
213
40
51
46.8
2.0
7,002
6,942
4060
60
960/300
359
272
237
54
40
72.2
2.1
7,626
7,546
4510
80
1,048
402
286
299
49
38
71.5
4.0
400b
8,390
7,150
4580
100
1,150
390
293
310
38
41
67.3
1.7
500
8,492
8,412
6000
80
1,475/300
503
324
398
40
47
76.4
2.6
Length
(mm)
Span
(mm)
Mass
(kg)
tb
(mm)
200
6,643
6,603
2000
265
5,253
5,213
2240
320a
320b
7,198
7,995
7,118
5,800
320c
5,985
370
400a
Vpre;EC2
Ibw
S
q
fctd 2 a1 rcp fctd
10
0
10
Stress [MPa]
Model
type
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
6
200
265
320a
320b
320c
370
400a
400b
500
5
Strain []
1
3
x 10
1508
#Bricks
m1
#DoF
m2
Strip
m1
m2
Strip
200
124,960
88,770
13,640
257,187
181,566
28,927
265
73,920
52,800
9,600
153,800
110,120
20,871
320a
190,060
129,688
30,160
365,533
250,027
59,259
320b
155,100
109,604
25,016
303,727
215,155
50,337
320c
187,872
131,016
29,468
350,891
245,321
56,436
370
253,640
173,072
40,832
461,977
316,015
76,107
400a
247,680
165,120
37,920
467,279
312,299
72,903
400b
224,112
151,984
34,220
427,631
290,711
66,699
500
350,976
230,328
52,416
636,664
418,864
96,714
8
0
0 x Ls 5/
>
<
2
s
1 Lt 5/xL
rp0 5/ x Ls 5/ Lt
rp
Lt
>
:
rp0
x Ls 5/ Lt
Combination
ID
Prestress
distribution
m2p1
Parabolic
m2p2
Parabolic
15
m2p3
Linear
m2p4
Linear
15
1509
laws, for each selected specimen, according to CEBFIP Model Code [4].
Confinement effect was neglected, while full shear
retention and lateral crack effect [20] were potentially
accounted, as well as inward slippage of the strands.
NewtonRaphson iteration scheme was adopted with
an energy-normalized convergence criterion. Sixnode brick elements were used and mesh sensitivity
was investigated by doubling the extruding offset. For
Fig. 5 Comparison between experimentally observed and numerically predicted web-shear failure mechanism: a experimental failure
of specimen 320b (adapted from [13] )and b numerical crack pattern at ultimate conditions
1510
250
200
320bm1p1
320bm2p1
320bm2p2
320bm2p3
320bm2p4
HypS320bm2p1
150
100
50
0
6
b 350
350
LF=19%
LF=37%
LF=48%
LF=59%
LF=70%
LF=78%
LF=85%
LF=93%
LF=96%
LF=100%
300
Depth [mm]
250
200
250
150
150
100
50
50
200
100
0
7
LF=19%
LF=37%
LF=48%
LF=59%
LF=70%
LF=78%
LF=85%
LF=93%
LF=96%
LF=100%
300
Depth [mm]
1511
0
7
350
320bm2p1
320bm2p2
320bm2p3
320bm2p4
300
Depth [mm]
250
200
150
100
50
0
7
Fig. 7 Evolution of the shear stress distributions at a x/D = 0.4 and b x/D = 0.7; c comparison between the four combinations of
prestress distributions and losses (x/D = 0.4)
evident increment is detected in the upper discontinuity. At LF roughly equal to 50 %, the peak shear stress
overall the depth rises up from the strand to the web
width drop level. This concentration remains pronounced up to LF = 85 %, when the first cracking
appears. For further LF increments, the ratio between
the current and previous peaks increases at a lower
rate, in accordance with the reduced slope of the
capacity curve into its nonlinear branch and the related
shear stress redistribution. Finally, at LF = 100 %,
the peak is further uplifted, in accordance with the
shear stress cut-off experienced. This behavior reveals
the complex interaction between cross-section geometric features, in terms of hollow core shape, and the
transfer mechanism of the prestressing force. The two
1512
500
200m2p1
265m2p1
320am2p1
320bm2p1
320cm2p1
370m2p1
400am2p1
400bm2p1
500m2p1
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0.5
0.5
1.5
2
1.8
EC2
Yang
ACI
CSA
FEM
Vobs = Vpre
1.6
Ri = Vobs / Vpre []
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Vpre [kN]
1513
nonlinear branches, with different slope and postyielding stiffness. Evidently low displacement ductility levels, approximately ranging from 1.3 to 2.3,
according to different hollow core shapes and crosssection features, are observed. Each specimen collapses by brittle web-shear mode, thus confirming the
intrinsic lack of ductility reserve for this type of
member. According to FE results, PPHC units with
circular voids typically exhibits a relatively more
ductile response, reaching a displacement ductility of
about 2, while a less uniform trend is detected in
deeper cross-sections characterized by non-circular
voids. In fact, displacement ductilities up to *2 are
determined for slabs presenting a relevant web width
and concrete thickness above and below the hollow
core itself (specimens 500 and 370) or an almost
regular web width variation along the hollow core
depth (specimen 400a). By contrast, specimens characterized by an abrupt and irregular web width drop
(specimen 400b) or reduced web width, if compared to
concrete thickness above and below the hollow core
(specimens 320a and 320b), ensure evidently lower
Loss of prestress = 5 %
EC2
Vobs
(kN)
Yang
ACI
Vpre
(kN)
Ri
()
Vpre
(kN)
Ri
()
CSA
Vpre
(kN)
FEM
Ri
()
Vpre
(kN)
Ri
()
Vpre
(kN)
Ri
()
200
90.2
145.7
0.619
128.0
0.704
98.5
0.916
114.8
0.786
94.3
0.956
265
219.4
223.8
0.980
223.7
0.981
155.8
1.408
158.1
1.388
223.2
0.983
320a
297.1
378.7
0.785
322.9
0.920
266.8
1.114
240.4
1.236
290.8
1.022
320b
320c
232.5
253.9
359.7
246.6
0.646
1.030
317.2
239.7
0.733
1.059
253.1
174.8
0.919
1.453
236.5
166.0
0.983
1.530
221.4
252.8
1.050
1.004
370
306.2
396.2
0.773
373.8
0.819
277.7
1.103
255.4
1.199
315.4
0.971
400a
291.3
475.4
0.613
444.0
0.656
363.3
0.802
309.0
0.943
293.9
0.991
400b
444.0
500.9
0.886
405.7
1.094
348.8
1.273
278.9
1.592
443.3
1.002
500
471.2
702.5
0.671
565.7
0.833
550.7
0.856
415.6
1.134
469.8
1.003
Vobs, Vpre and relative Ri for each specimen, according to EC2, ACI, CSA provisions, Yangs approach and FEM
Table 6 Mean and standard deviation of Ri, according to EC2, Yang, ACI, CSA and FEM approaches
Model type
Loss of prestress = 5 %
EC2
All
Yang
ACI
CSA
FEM
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
0.778
15.7 %
0.867
15.7 %
1.094
24.1 %
1.199
27.1 %
0.998
2.8 %
1514
Fig. 9 Evolution of the principal tensile strains E1 for monotonically increased vertical displacement steps imposed (specimen 400b)
1515
1516
Fig. 10 Subsequent evolution of the principal compressive strains E3 for monotonically increased vertical displacement steps
(specimen 400b)
1517
Fig. 11 Different evolution of E1 in specimen 400a, still characterized by non-circular voids, but with increased regularity in terms of
web width variation along depth
1518
Fig. 12 Comparison
between the evolution of E1
for different hollow core
shapes, characterized by
a circular (specimen 320c)
and b non-circular voids
(specimen 320b)
1
200m2p1
265m2p1
320am2p1
320bm2p1
320cm2p1
370m2p1
400am2p1
400bm2p1
500m2p1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
8
1519
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
8
200m2p1
265m2p1
320am2p1
320bm2p1
320cm2p1
370m2p1
400am2p1
400bm2p1
500m2p1
0.9
1
200m2p1
265m2p1
320am2p1
320bm2p1
320cm2p1
370m2p1
400am2p1
400bm2p1
500m2p1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
8
200m2p1
265m2p1
320am2p1
320bm2p1
320cm2p1
370m2p1
400am2p1
400bm2p1
500m2p1
0.9
Fig. 13 Shear stress distributions at ultimate conditions versus normalized slab depth for increased distance from the support,
assuming parabolic prestress distribution and 5 % loss of prestress
3 Conclusions
A modeling approach, based on nonlinear fracture
mechanisms, was proposed to predict the shear
response of PPHC slabs. Numerical observations were
discussed to investigate the failure mode of the units
analysed and to depict behavioral changes as consequence of geometrical variations in their cross-section
shape. The following observations and conclusions
were drawn from the numerical study:
1520
References
1. ACI Committee (2005) Building code requirements for
structural concrete (ACI 31805) and commentary (ACI
318R05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills
1521
23. Yang L (1994) Design of prestressed hollow core slabs with
reference to web shear failure. J Struct Eng ASCE 120(9):
26752696