Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 14 March 2014
Received in revised form 30 July 2014
Accepted 4 August 2014
Available online 11 August 2014
Keywords:
Liquidliquid equilibria
2,2-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane
Multicomponent mixtures
NRTL
UNIFAC
a b s t r a c t
Liquidliquid equilibria (LLE) data are presented for two quaternary systems: 2,2-dimethyl-1,3dioxolane (DMD) + n-heptane (or toluene) + ethanol + water, and for three ternary subsystems:
DMD + ethanol + water and DMD + n-heptane (or toluene) + water. The measurements were performed at
293.15 K and atmospheric pressure. The phase diagrams show extended heterogeneous areas for ternary
systems containing n-heptane (or toluene) and water, the region going from waterhydrocarbon side
of the concentration triangle to waterDMD side. A much smaller region of immiscibility with the critical point is observed for ternary mixtures of DMD with water and ethanol. The experimental LLE data
were correlated and partly predicted applying the NRTL model. The UNIFAC interaction parameters for
CH2 O groups of dioxolane alkyl-derivatives were estimated. The model was applied to predict the LLE
diagrams for ternary DMD + n-heptane (+toluene) + water solutions and for the quaternary systems containing ethanol. Both NRTL and UNIFAC models with re-estimated parameters have provided satisfactory
results.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Systems containing polyol derivatives attract special attention
during the last years, and this is mainly due to their growing industrial applications and to good possibilities for their synthesis using
natural raw materials. Cyclic acetals and ketals (in particular, 1,3dioxolane and its derivatives) obtained by chemical modication
of ethylene glycol and glycerol are among substances of interest.
They serve as reagents or solvents in organic synthesis, are used
in production of various materials. Some cyclic acetals and ketals
are considered as perspective additives to gasoline, biofuels and
diesel fuels capable of improving the octane number, phase stability
and (or) ecological characteristics [1,2]. Alkyl-derivatives of 1,3dioxolane-4-methanol have appeared to be effective, inexpensive
and nontoxic icing inhibitors [3,4]. Practical tasks and the research
interest to specic features of the behavior of solutions containing
cyclic polyethers stimulate the studies of thermodynamic properties of such systems, and a special attention is paid to their phase
behavior.
94
for three models tried. With the interaction parameters estimated for the binary subsystems the VLE diagram for the ternary
system 1,3-dioxolane + 2-propanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane was
predicted. The group contribution UNIFAC and ASOG models were
used to predict the VLE in binary mixtures of 1,3-dioxolane
and 1,4-dioxane with alcohols [18,20], and in ternary systems 1,3-dioxolane + 1-butanol + cyclohexane/n-hexane [8]. The
both models gave satisfactory results for the systems containing 1,4-dioxane, while for the mixtures containing 1,3-dioxolane
(especially for the ternaries) the UNIFAC predictions were better
than the predictions using the ASOG model. The SAFT-VR approach
has been used to predict the phase equilibria for binary mixtures
of 1,3-dioxolane and 1,4-dioxane with chlorobutane isomers [15].
A good overall agreement was obtained, but the approach failed to
predict the azeotropic behavior exhibited by some of the mixtures.
With one additional adjustable parameter introduced an adequate
description of the experimental data was achieved.
There are few studies devoted to phase equilbria modeling for
mixtures containing substituted dioxolanes. The VLE data correlation using the NRTL model was performed for binary mixtures of
4-methyl-1,3-dioxolane with methanol, propylene glycol and acetone [27]. The ability to correlate VLLE data for binary mixtures
of water with 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane or with 2,4-dimethyl-1,3dioxolane applying the UNIQUAC model was studied in [25]. The
calculations using the UNIFAC model were performed to describe
the mutual solubility of the components in binary and multicomponent mixtures of 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane-4-methanol
with n-heptane, ethanol and water [26]. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to optimize the phase behavior modeling for these
complex mixtures which are of applied interest (in particular, in
the search of effective additives for biofuels, as it was mentioned
above).
3. Experimental
3.1. Chemicals
Information on the source, purity, and density of the chemicals
used is presented in Table 1. Densities were measured with DM
45 Mettler Toledo vibrating-tube densimeter automatically thermostated within 0.01 K. The water content in ethanol and in DMD
was controlled by the Karl Fisher (KF) titration method (Mettler
Toledo, V20). The purity of organic solvents was estimated by the
gas chromatography (GC) method.
To get pure ethanol its aqueous ethanol recticate was subjected
to the azeotropic rectication with added benzene. Distilled water
was used in the experiments.
The densities of n-heptane, toluene, ethanol and water corresponded to the standard literature values. Characteristics of DMD
were those provided by the producers.
3.2. Procedures applied in the LLE studies
The rst step of the experimental study was to nd out in
which of the binary mixtures of DMD with n-heptane, toluene,
water and ethanol miscibility gaps exist. Visual observations
were performed in the temperature range 243.13313.15 K with
the concentration step 15 mol% and the temperature step 10
degrees for each of the compositions. The tests have shown
that the limited miscibility is observed only for DMD mixtures with water, whereas DMD + ethanol, DMD + n-heptane and
DMD + toluene binaries demonstrate the complete mutual miscibility of the components. Analogous tests were performed for
ternary systems formed by three homogeneous binary subsystems
(DMD + ethanol + n-heptane, DMD + ethanol + toluene), and the aim
95
Table 1
Properties of the pure compounds.a
Compound
Source
Purication method
Analysis method
DMD
n-Heptane
Toluene
Ethanol
Water
Fluka
Vekton
Vekton
Vekton
>0.990
>0.998
>0.998
>0.998
>0.999
None
None
None
Azeotropic rectication
Distillation
GLC, KF
GLC
GLC
GLC, KF
Exp
944.2
683.8
866.9
789.5
998.2
Standard uncertainties (u) of the measured densities () are u() = 0.1 kg m3 .
Fig. 1. The LLE phase diagram for DMD + ethanol + water system at T = 293.15 K: the
experimental binodal curve and tie-lines, and the results of modeling using the NRTL
and UNIFAC (points).
96
Table 2
Experimental equilibrium mole fractions xi in the saturated solutions for ternary systems; T = 293.15 K, p = 101.3 kPa (Binodal curve data).a
DMD + ethanol + water
xD
xE
xW
xD
xH
xW
xD
xT
xW
Organic phase
0.802
0.681
0.579
0.523
0.316
0.000
0.043
0.063
0.075
0.087
0.198
0.276
0.358
0.402
0.597
0.243*
0.478*
0.599*
0.676*
0.767*
0.786*
0.804
0.797
0.818
0.816
0.811
0.802
0.738*
0.494*
0.362*
0.273*
0.161*
0.130*
0.089
0.086
0.077
0.043
0.021
0.000
0.019*
0.028*
0.039*
0.051*
0.072*
0.084*
0.107
0.117
0.105
0.141
0.168
0.198
0.100*
0.297*
0.456*
0.562*
0.788*
0.809*
0.822*
0.802
0.892*
0.685*
0.516*
0.391*
0.096*
0.050*
0.022*
0.000
0.008*
0.018*
0.028*
0.047*
0.116*
0.141*
0.156*
0.198
Aqueous phase
0.232
0.156
0.136
0.111
0.098
0.085
0.066
0.049
0.079
0.065
0.063
0.058
0.051
0.041
0.026
0.000
0.689
0.779
0.801
0.831
0.851
0.874
0.908
0.951
0.001
0.019
0.030
0.030
0.044
0.049
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.000
0.986
0.978
0.968
0.969
0.955
0.951
0.014
0.022
0.029
0.041
0.044
0.049
0.002
0.002
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.000
0.984
0.976
0.966
0.956
0.954
0.951
Standard uncertainties (u) are u(T) = 0.1 K, u(x) = 0.001. The data were obtained by the titration method (unmarked gures) or using GC (. . .*).
binodal, each of the branches going from the water + n-heptane side
of the concentration triangle to the DMD + water side. The homogeneous area near the apex of pure water is very narrow. Near
the apex of pure n-heptane such area is quite narrow too. But this
(organic) homogeneous range is getting wider on DMD addition
and it extends along the whole n-heptane + DMD side. The LLE tielines going from some point on the organic binodal brunch to some
point on the other brunch are directed approximately to the apex
of pure water.
The LLE phase boundary was determined by titration for the
water enriched area and by the GC at low water contents (Table 2).
The compositions of equilibrium liquid phases determined by the
GC are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 3. Unfortunately, in the GC
Table 3
Experimental equilibrium mole fractions xi in the coexisting liquid phases for the ternary systems; T = 293.15 K, p = 101.3 kPa (tie-lines).a
Organic phase
DMD + ethanol + water
xD
0.802
0.775
0.732
0.718
0.652
0.544
0.444
0.416
DMD + n-heptane + water
xD
0.150
0.406
0.495
0.622
0.736
0.802
DMD + toluene + water
xD
0.100
0.297
0.456
0.562
0.788
0.802
a
Aqueous phase
xE
0.000
0.014
0.027
0.033
0.049
0.069
0.080
0.084
xW
0.198
0.211
0.241
0.249
0.299
0.387
0.476
0.500
xD
0.049
0.055
0.063
0.066
0.073
0.091
0.120
0.140
xE
0.000
0.009
0.017
0.021
0.032
0.045
0.058
0.063
xW
0.951
0.936
0.920
0.913
0.895
0.864
0.822
0.797
xH
0.844
0.574
0.475
0.338
0.197
0.000
xW
0.006
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.067
0.198
xD
0.011
0.025
0.034
0.037
0.043
0.049
xH
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.000
xW
0.988
0.974
0.965
0.961
0.955
0.951
xT
0.892
0.685
0.516
0.391
0.096
0.000
xW
0.008
0.018
0.028
0.047
0.116
0.198
xD
0.002
0.008
0.013
0.019
0.037
0.049
xT
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.000
xW
0.998
0.992
0.987
0.981
0.963
0.951
97
Table 4
Experimental mole fractions xi in the coexisting liquid phases (tie-lines) for the quaternary systems; T = 293.15 K, p = 101.3 kPa.a
Organic phase
DMD + ethanol + n-heptane + water
xE
xD
0.284
0.063
0.197
0.033
0.131
0.307
0.192
0.047
0.081
0.358
0.050
0.354
0.173
0.076
DMD + ethanol + toluene + water
xE
xD
0.253
0.166
0.120
0.101
0.227
0.212
0.087
0.089
0.084
0.513
0.026
0.156
0.233
0.099
a
Aqueous phase
xH
0.635
0.761
0.516
0.750
0.529
0.574
0.736
xW
0.018
0.009
0.046
0.011
0.032
0.022
0.015
xD
0.072
0.025
0.162
0.044
0.085
0.044
0.078
xE
0.207
0.128
0.345
0.210
0.192
0.120
0.346
xH
0.001
<0.001
0.023
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
0.007
xW
0.720
0.847
0.470
0.746
0.722
0.836
0.569
xT
0.476
0.748
0.428
0.801
0.301
0.806
0.626
xW
0.105
0.031
0.133
0.023
0.102
0.012
0.042
xD
0.032
0.016
0.050
0.007
0.033
0.006
0.014
xE
0.184
0.224
0.261
0.184
0.079
0.070
0.130
xT
0.003
0.005
0.018
0.002
0.006
<0.001
<0.001
xW
0.781
0.755
0.671
0.807
0.882
0.924
0.856
into account). All the results presented for the system are in a good
agreement between themselves.
4.3. DMD + toluene + water mixtures
Fig. 2. The LLE phase diagram for DMD + n-heptane + water system at T = 293.15 K:
the experimental binodal curve and tie-lines, and the results of modeling using the
NRTL and UNIFAC (points).
Fig. 3. The LLE phase diagram for DMD + toluene + water system at T = 293.15 K: the
experimental binodal curve and tie-lines, and the results of modeling using the NRTL
and UNIFAC (points).
Phase behavior modeling for the ternary and quaternary systems under study was carried out applying the NRTL and UNIFAC
models. NRTL model [30], despite its simplicity, can be quite useful
for the correlation of LLE data in binary systems and for making predictions of the phase behavior of multicomponent mixtures basing
on the data for the binary constituents. The predictive abilities of
the UNIFAC group contribution model [31] are much wider. The
bank of the UNIFAC parameters (the geometrical parameters of
98
Table 5
NRTL model interaction parameters.
DMD
n-Heptane
Toluene
Ethanol
Water
DMD
n-Heptane
Toluene
Ethanol
Water
0
161.3
271.2
338.2
778.7
671.4
0
3610
384.6
2672
1534.
0
522.3
325.1
1098
1781
36.62
0
Table 6
UNIFAC group assignment in this study.
Substance
Main
group
Subgroups and
their numbers
DMD
CH2
DCH2 O
CH2
OH
CH2
ACH
ACCH3
H2 O
2 CH3 1 C
2 DCH2 O
1 CH3 1 CH2
1 OH
2 CH3 5 CH2
5 ACH
1 ACCH3
1 H2 O
Ethanol
n-Heptane
Toluene
Water
various chemical groups and the energy parameters of interaction between the groups) is rather extensive, the estimations of
the parameters are based mainly on the VLE data; for many groups
special parameters for LLE modeling are presented [32].
99
Table 7
UNIFAC group interaction parameters used in this work.
CH2
ACH
ACCH2
OH
H2 O
DCH2 O
a
CH2
ACH
ACCH2
OH
H2 O
DCH2 O
0
156.5
104.4
328.2
342.4
300a
114.8
0
146.8
9.21
372.8
52.13
115.7
167.0
0
1.27
203.7
65.69
644.6
703.9
4000
0
122.4
256.1a
1300
859.4
5695
28.73
0
448.4a
187.5a
32.14
213.1
540.0a)
237.2a
0
References
[1] Delfort, B., Durand, I., Jaecker, A., Lacome, T., Montagne, X., Paille, F., Diesel
Fuel Compounds Containing Glycerol Acetals, US Patent 2003/0163949 A1 (4
September 2003).
[2] Varfolomeev, S.D., Nikiforov, G.A., Voleva, V.B., Makarov, G.G., Trusov, L.I., Gasoline Octane Booster, RF Patent 2008121078 (27 August 2009).
[3] G.W. Mushrush, E.J. Beal, D.R. Hardy, J.M. Hughes, J.C. Cummings, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 38 (1999) 24972502.
[4] S. Trohalaki, R. Pachter, J.R. Cummings, Energy Fuels 13 (1999) 992998.
[5] H.S. Wu, S.I. Sandler, J. Chem. Eng. Data 34 (1989) 209213.
[6] R. Francesconi, F. Comelli, V. Malta, J. Chem. Eng. Data 38 (1993)
424427.
[7] E. Calvo, M. Artal, J.M. Embid, I. Velasco, S. Otn, J. Chem. Eng. Data 44 (1999)
193196.
[8] I. Gascn, S. Martn, H. Artigas, M.C. Lpez, C. Lafuente, Chem. Eng. J. 88 (2002)
19.
[9] T.T. Huang, C.H. Tu, J. Chem. Eng. Data 55 (2010) 513518.
[10] R.J. Meyer, G.L. Giusti, M.F. Meyer, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 11 (1979) 713718.
[11] F. Comelli, R. Francesconi, J. Chem. Eng. Data 35 (1990) 283284.
[12] P. Brocos, E. Calvo, A. Amigo, R. Bravo, M. Pintos, A.H. Roux, G. Roux-Desgranges,
J. Chem. Eng. Data 43 (1998) 112116.
[13] P. Brocos, E. Calvo, R. Bravo, M. Pintos, A. Amigo, A.H. Roux, G. Roux-Desgranges,
J. Chem. Eng. Data 44 (1999) 6772.
[14] I. Bandrs, I. Giner, G. Pera, B. Giner, C. Lafuente, Fluid Phase Equilib. 257 (2007)
7077.
[15] B. Giner, I. Gascn, H. Artigas, C. Lafuente, A. Galindo, J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007)
95889597.
[16] B. Giner, A. Villares, S. Martn, C. Lafuente, F.M. Royo, Fluid Phase Equilib. 251
(2007) 816.
[17] G.A. Chubarov, S.M. Danov, A.L. Balashov, T.A. Avdoshina, Russ. J. Appl. Chem.
64 (1991) 27152717.
[18] I. Gascn, M. Domnguez, P. Cea, M.C. Lpez, F.M. Royo, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 33
(2001) 13611373.
[19] K. Kurihara, T. Oshita, K. Ochi, K. Kojima, J. Chem. Eng. Data 48 (2003)
102106.