Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(Relevant Facts)
Petitioner KIPI filed a petition for review on certiorari of the adverse
decision of respondent CA. However, it was denied by this Court for failure to
sufficiently show that respondent court had committed any reversible error in
its questioned judgement (see above). Hence, in its second motion for
reconsideration, petitioner tried a different approach by assailing the minute
resolutions are in violation of the constitution.
ISSUE/S:
1. W/N the issuance of Minute Resolutions is valid under Section 14,
Article VIII of the Constitution.
Notes:
1. Overall decision of the case (Petition hereby granted/denied/remanded/etc)
2. Laws cited in the case; and their description
3. Other notes