Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 184

SIX SIGMA

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

207

APPROACH TO ANALYZE

Develop a
focused problem
statement

Process Analysis

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Organize
potential
causes

Hypothesis
Testing and
Regression
Analysis

Design of
Experiments

208

IN THE ANALYSIS PHASE YOU WILL...

Brainstorm on Xs

Find change of which Xs affect Y and in what manner

Ultimately find which Xs are critical to move the Y in the desired


direction

IN MEASURE PHASE, WE DEALT WITH Ys.


IN ANALYSIS PHASE, WE WILL DISCOVER
& DEAL WITH Xs.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

209

Understanding
Process

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

210

UNDERSTANDING A PROCESS

To better understand your


process, you will:


Create a flowchart of your


process.
Identify which of your
process steps are valueadded and which are
nonvalue-added.

Determine cycle time and identify bottlenecks.


Look for errors or inefficiencies that contribute to defects.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

211

FLOWCHARTS

Flowcharts are tools that make a process visible.


Start

Step 1

Step 2

Yes

Step 3

Step 6

Decision

End

No

Step 4

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Step 5

212

TYPES OF FLOWCHARTS USEFUL


FOR UNDERSTANDING PROCESS FLOW

Activity flowcharts

Deployment flowcharts
Sales

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Technical

Shipping

Coordinator

213

ACTIVITY FLOWCHARTS
Hotel Check-out Process


Activity flowcharts
are specific about
what happens in a
process. They often
capture decision
points, rework
loops, complexity,
etc.

1
Approach front desk

2
Is there
a line?

YES

Process Name

3
Wait

NO

Numbered
steps

4
Step up to desk

5
Clerk
available?

NO

Clear
direction of
flow (top to
bottom or
left to right)

6
Wait

Key of symbols
YES

Start/End

Consistent
level of
detail

7
Give room number

Action/Task
8
Check bill
Decision

Sequence

9
Charges
correct?

NO

10
Correct charges

YES
11
Pay bill

Date of creation
or update &
name of creator

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Clear starting
and ending
points

214

DEPLOYMENT FLOWCHARTS

Deployment flowcharts show


the detailed steps in a
process and which people
or groups are involved in
each step.
They are particularly useful
in processes that involve
the flow of information
between
people
or
functions, as they help
highlight handoff areas.

People or groups
listed across the top Invoicing Process
Sales

Billing

Steps listed in
column of person or
group doing step or
in charge

Shipping

Customer

Delivers goods

Notifies sales of
completed delivery

Receives
delivery

Elapsed
Time

Time flows
down the
page
5 days

Records receipt and


claims against this
delivery

Sends invoice to
customer

10 days
4

10

Notifies billing
of invoice

Receives invoice

11
5

Files invoice

Checks invoice
against receipt

12

Pays bill

Receives and
records payment
7

Reviews weekly
report of overdue
accounts

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Horizontal lines
clearly identify
handoffs

215

WHICH FLOWCHARTING TECHNIQUE


SHOULD I USE?
Basic
Flowchart

Activity
Flowchart

Deployment
Flowchart

To identify the major


steps of the process
and where it begins
and ends

To display the
complexity and
decision points of a
process

To help highlight
handoff areas in
processes between
people or functions

To illustrate where in
the process you will
collect data

To identify rework
loops and bottlenecks

To clarify roles and


indicate dependencies

Which flowchart do you intend to use for your project?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

216

HOW TO CREATE FLOWCHARTS

When creating a flowchart, work with a group


so you can get multiple viewpoints.


Brainstorm action steps


>

>

Write these on self-stick notes or on


a flipchart
Make sure to include the steps that
occur when things go wrong

Arrange the steps in sequence


> Be consistent in the direction of flow
time should always flow from top to bottom, or from left to right
> Use appropriate flowchart symbols
Check for missing steps or decision points
Number the steps

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

217

FOUR PERSPECTIVES

Flowcharts can map four different perspectives on a process:

What you think the process is.


What the process really is.
What the process could be.
What the process should be.

At this stage of a DMAIC project, you are trying to define the current
situation, as it is. Therefore, your flowchart(s) should map what is really
happening in the process.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

218

COPY PROCESS

Process Steps [As we think]

Put original
on glass

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Close Lid

Adjust
Settings

Press
START

Remove
originals
and copies

219

COPY PROCESS

Yes
Take Original

Copier Yes
in Use?

Wait?

No

Leave

No
Place
Original

No

Select
Size

Glass Yes
Dirty?

Select
Orientation

Clean

Select
Number

Paper? No

Find
Paper

Yes
Yes
No
Box
Open?

Knife? No

Find
Knife

Open
Box

Yes
Yes Paper No
Loaded?

Find
Help
No

Yes
Start
Copier

Copy Yes
Made?

Quality No
Ok?

Stop
Copier

Yes

No
Adjust
Yes Another
Page?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Find
Help

Fix
No
Problem?

No
Remove
Original

Adjust?

Yes
Collect
Copies

Staple
copies

Clear
modes

Leave

220

VALUE-ADDED AND NONVALUE-ADDED STEPS




Value-Added Step:

Customers are willing to pay for it.


It physically changes the product.
Its done right the first time.

Nonvalue-Added Step:

Is not essential to produce output.


Does not add value to the output.
Includes:
>
>
>
>

Defects, errors, omissions.


Preparation/setup, control/inspection.
Over-production, processing, inventory.
Transporting, motion, waiting, delays.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

221

EXAMPLES
Value-Added Activities

Entering order
Ordering materials
Preparing drawing
Assembling
Legally mandated testing
Packaging
Shipping to customer

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Nonvalue-Added Activities

Waiting
Storing
Staging
Counting
Inspecting
Recording
Obtaining Approvals
Testing
Reviewing
Copying
Filing
Revising/Reworking
Tracking
222

MEASURING CYCLE TIME


1. Decide whether you will measure
cycle time on the entire process
or on a subset of steps.
2. Develop operational definitions
for the starting and ending points
of each step.

Process Step

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Cumulative
Time

VA Time

3. Develop consensus about


what is value-added and
what is nonvalue-added time
(if you havent done so
already).
4. Develop a data collection
form.

NVA Time

Notes

223

VALUE ANALYSIS MATRIX




You can track specific types of nonvalue-added time with a valueanalysis matrix. This helps clarify not only the types of waste present
in the process, but also the percentage of overall process time each
nonvalue-added step adds.

Process Step

10

Time (Hours)

12

10

10

20

10

10

20

Total %Total
100

100%

2%

10

10%

6%

Delay

52

52%

Transporting/Motion

30

30%

100

100%

Value-Added
Nonvalue-added
Fixing errors
Prep/Set-up
Control/Inspection

Total
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

224

Graphical Data
Analysis

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

225

Using Stratified Frequency Plots


When one variable has continuous data and another has attribute or
discrete data, the best option for analyzing results is the stratified
frequency plot.


Gather continuous data for each of the attribute types or


categories
>

Create a frequency plot for each category


>

For example, collect data on number of defects for each


of four different types of customized orders
Use the same numeric scale and plot size for each plot
so you can easily compare multiple plots

Look for patterns

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

226

Discrete X and Continuous Y


Location A

Theory: Variation in
training, technique, and
procedures at different
locations accounts for
much of the variation in
how long it takes to
complete oil change/lubes

4
3
2
1

All locations combined

0
7

10

11

12 13

14 15

16 17

19 20

21

Location B

18

5
4

Data: Measure the time


needed to complete lube
job at different locations


Count

2
1

3
0
7

10 11

12 13

14 15

16

17 18

19 20

21

2
6

Location C

1
5
4

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Minutes

3
2
1
0
7

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

10

11

12 13

14 15

16 17

18

19 20

21

227

Continuous X and Discrete Y


Theory: The more
time spent with a
customer, the more
likely we will make a
sale


Data: Measure time


spent with customer
and separate your
results into two
categories (Made the
Sale vs. Did Not Make
the Sale)

Made the Sale

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 >60
Time With Customer
(in minutes)

Did Not Make


the Sale

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 >60
Time With Customer
(in minutes)

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

228

Scatter Plots Definition

A scatter plot is a graph


that helps you visualize
the relationship between
two variables. It can be
used to check whether
one variable is related to
another variable and is an
effective way to
communicate the
relationship you find.


Scatter Plot of
Time Needed to Assemble the Product vs.
Workers Time on the Job

Time
(mins)
10
9
8
7
6
5

2
2

2
Product A

Product B
3
2

2
1
1

10 11 12 >12

Months on job

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

229

Why & When to Use Scatter Plots

To study and identify possible relationships between the changes


observed in two different sets of variables

To understand the relationships between variables


To discover whether two variables are related

To find out if changes in one variable are associated with changes in


the other

To test for a cause-and-effect relationship; but finding


such an apparent relationship does not necessarily imply causation.
Even strong correlations do not imply causation.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

230

Scatter Plot Features


Each data point
represents a pair of
measurements
(e.g., 8 hours after 2
Time
months on the job)

Scatter Plot of
Time Needed to Assemble the Product vs.
Workers Time on the Job

(mins)
10

Stratification
using different
symbols allows
you to look at
multiple patterns
at once.

Time to Assemble
(Hours)

8
7
6
5

2
2

2
Product A

Product B
3
2

2
1
1

Two variables are


represented. Often
the effect is on the
vertical axis and
the potential
cause is on the
horizontal axis.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

10 11 12 >12

Months on job

Both axes are


roughly equal in
length so the plot
is square.

The pattern
formed by the
scatter is an
important clue to
how the two
variables are
related.

231

Organization of Potential
Cause

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

232

Organizing for Potential Causes

Understand the need to organize potential causes visually

Know when and how to construct a C&E diagram

Know when and how to create and use a tree diagram or an


affinity diagram

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

233

Graphic displays can help you structure possible causes in


order to find relationships that will shed new light on your
problem.


Means
Means/Objective
Means


Means/Objective

Means
Means/Objective
Means
Problem
Statement

Objective
Means
Means/Objective
Means
Means/Objective
Means
Means/Objective
Means

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

234

Why Use Cause-and-Effect Diagrams

To stimulate thinking during a brainstorm of potential causes


To understand relationships between potential causes
To track which potential causes have been investigated, and which
proved to contribute significantly to the problem

Use a Cause-and-Effect Diagram:

When there is so large a number of potential causes that it is difficult


to focus the analysis.

When there is a lack of clarity about the relationship between different


potential causes.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

235

BRAIN STORMING
What is Brainstorming ?
Brainstorming is a simple but effective technique for
generating many ideas of a group of people within a
short span of time to solve a given problem

BASIC RULES FOR BRAINSTORMING


 Defer evaluation
 Fantasize freely
 Generate quantity
 Build on ideas
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

236

Defer Evaluation
Put critical faculties in cold storage- even constructive criticism. This
is to ensure a proper climate of acceptance of all sorts of ideas. No
idea should be treated as stupid.

Fantasize Freely

Dont operate with your brakes on. The participants are encouraged,
urged to let themselves go and generate ideas, no matter how fanciful
these ideas are.

Generate Quantity
Generate as many ideas as possible. A pearl diver will be more
successful in finding pearls, perhaps the pearl, when he brings up 200
oysters than when he surfaces only 15-20 oysters.

Build on Ideas
Idea of one participant is more effectively built up by another
participant.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

237

PRINCIPLES OF BRAINSTORMING
 Deferment of evaluation develops the appropriate
psychologically safe climate for ideation
 The uniqueness of each participants knowledge is
tapped to develop new insights
 Ideas of one participant tend to trigger off ideas in the
brains of other group members
 Free association encourages fruitful ideation
 The pressure of time bound sessions in a nonthreatening atmosphere is conducive to a high
productivity of ideas
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

238

CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM


To generate in a structured manner, maximum
number of ideas regarding possible causes for a
problem by using brainstorming technique.
HOW TO PREPARE CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM
 Clarify the problem
 Gather members for discussion
 Conduct Brainstorming session
 Group the causes
Man, Material, Machine, Method etc.
 Draw the cause and effect chart
 Check for missing information
 Determine importance of significance of causes
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

239

STRUCTURE OF A CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM


Man

Machine

Problem
/ Effect

Material

Method

Each of the main branches has many potential sub


branches that further subdivide the potential causes.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

240

Cause and Effect Diagram for High Petrol Consumption


Procedure

Driver

Impatience
Craze

Vehicle
Spark plugs
Contacts
Life

Heavy
Poor
anticipation

Always
late
Lack of
awareness
Riding on
clutch

Bad
attitude
Poor
skill

Wrong
gears

Body
Shape
Inexperience

Wrong
culture

High H.P

Spurious

Crossings
One way

No turn

Circuitous
Road

Road

Fuel mix
Carburetor

Engine
Cylinders

Restrictions

Technical
details

Spares

High Petrol

Consumption
Impurities
Incorrect
Octane no.

Traffic

Tyres Inferior
Frequent
Petrol
Faulty
stops Negligence
pressure
Speed Breakers
Additives
Ignorance
Potholes
Irregular
Incorrect viscosity
Low pressure
servicing
Poor
Clogged
Oil
condition
filters
False
Steep
Not changed
economy
Low level

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Maintenance

Materials

241

USES OF CAUSE AND EFFECT DIAGRAM


To investigate and list down the cause and effect
relationship of problem under investigation.
Analyze the problem to trace the real root cause.
To help stratification for collection of further data
to confirm relationship.
To help evolve counter-measure.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

242

Identifying Potential Causes: Review

Start with a narrow problem definition


List potential causes
Organize potential causes using a cause-and-effect
diagram, tree diagram, or affinity diagram
Visual displays can be a powerful communication tool
Now it is time to revisit and finalize the focused problem
statement.
None of these causes has been verified; cause verification
is the next step in the DMAIC cycle

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

243

Validation of Potential
Cause

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

244

Problem Statement: Current process does not meet


customer on-time delivery of 5 days +/-1 day

Process
variation

Measurement
variation

Gage R&R

Customer
to
Customer
ANOVA: p=.93
TEV: p=1.00

Plant
to
Plant

Season
to
Season

Method of
Shipment

Shipment
to
Shipment

ANOVA: p=.43
ANOVA: p=.54
ANOVA: p=.08 TEV: p=1.00
TEV: p=.79
TEV: p=1.00

ANOVA: p=.38
TEV: p=1.00

Day of
Week to
Day of
Week
M
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Other

ROOT CAUSE
ANOVA: p=.000
TEV: p=.000

Sa

Su
245

Steps

Validation depend on two scenario, whether cause


and effect relationship is known or unknown.
If relationship is know and best possible value is
established, then do GEMBA investigation method.
Otherwise carryout Data Analysis.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

246

Validation of Causes

GEMBA (Work Place) Investigation

List each cause and verify them through workplace


observations.
Causes
Bunching
of car

Specifications/ Desired Observations


Remarks
states
May be a potential
9 out of 10
Maximum 2 at a
Moments it is cause for
time
Delay in servicing
occurring

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

247

H
H

H
H

o
a

A
A

<

=
>

Hypotheses of
Means

B
B

Hypotheses of
Standard
Deviations

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Hypothesis Testing Concepts


Allow Us To .

Properly handle uncertainty


Minimize subjectivity
Question assumptions
Prevent the omission of important
information
Manage the risk of decision errors

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

249

Hypothesis Testing
We want to take a practical problem and change it to a statistical problem
 We use relatively small samples to estimate population parameters
 There is always a chance that we can select a weird sample
 Sample may not represent a typical set of observations
 Inferential statistics allows us to estimate the probability of getting a weird
sample
 Example
 If we wanted to know a coin was fair, we could flip it a number of times
and track how many heads we saw
 By chance we would expect about 50% of the flips to be heads
 If we flipped the coin 10 times and got 10 heads, we would be fairly
confident the coin is not fair
 There is one chance out of 1000 that we could have gotten 10 heads with
a fair coin
 Therefore, we would say we are willing to take a 0.1% chance of being
wrong about our unfair coin


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

250

In the Real World





Yield

We can catch a good process on a bad day


We can catch a bad process on a good day
In either case, we can make the wrong inference

Study One

Study Two

We say we made an improvement in the process, but


the results were just a function of sampling
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

251

Overall Approach

Practical Problem

Statistical Problem

y = f ( x1 , x2 ,..., x k )
Practical Solution

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Statistical Solution

252

Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for


efficient citizenship as is the ability to read and write.

H.G. Wells Circa 1925

Key Terms
Ho = Null Hypothesis ,Ha = Alternative
Hypothesis ,P-Value = Probability Value

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

253

Hypothesis Testing


Real Life Hypothesis: The


newly modified machine will
reduce defects.
This is called the Alternative
Hypothesis (Ha)

H o :
H a:

a
a

Statistical Hypothesis: There


is no difference between the
old machines and the improved
one.
This is called the Null
Hypothesis (Ho)

b
b

We must show that the values we observed were so unlikely to come


from the same process, that Ho must be wrong.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

254

Hypothesis Testing
What is it for Statisticians ?
Ho:
Ha:

Mean Group A = Mean Group B


Mean Group A = Mean Group B

Ho:
Ha:

Slope of the line is 0


Slope of the line is not 0

Ho:
Ha:

Variance Group A = Variance Group B


Variance Group A = Variance Group B

Ho:
Ha:

Variable X is independent of Variable Y


Variable X is not independent of Variable Y

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

255

Hypothesis Testing
What is it for the Average Person ?
Ho: Age doesnt matter in a companys hiring practices
Ha: Age does matter in a companys hiring practices
Ho: Data is Normal
Ha: Data is not Normal
Ho: Batch X Avg. Cycle Time = Batch Y Avg. Cycle Time
Ha: Batch X Avg. Cycle Time = Batch Y Avg. Cycle Time

Ho = _______________________________________
Ha = _______________________________________
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

256

Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing










Based on what we know, we form a hypothesis to explain something


that we dont know
Generally, this hypothesis takes the form of: Y=f(x1,x2...xn)
We devise a test to prove the hypothesis true or false by testing the
effect of the xs on Y
We assume that the null hypothesis is true
We then look for compelling evidence to support or fail to accept that
hypothesis
If we fail to accept the null hypothesis, then we accept the
alternative hypothesis

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

257

Hypothesis and Decision Risk




When accepting or rejecting a hypothesis, we do so with a


known degree of risk and confidence
To do so, we specify in advance of the investigation the
magnitude of decision risk and test sensitivity which is
acceptable
Once this has been accomplished, we have the information
necessary to determine an ideal sample size
We must then consider the practical limitations of cost, time
and available resources in order to arrive at a rational sampling
plan

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

258

What is Hypothesis Testing?


State a Null Hypothesis (Ho)

Hypotheses of
Means

Ho: o = 13.6
Ha: o < 13.6

Hypotheses of
Standard
Deviations

Ho: A = B
Ha: A > B

Gather evidence (a sample of reality)

DECIDE:
What does the evidence suggest?
Reject Ho?

or

Not Reject Ho?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

259

About the Null Hypothesis...

The Null Hypothesis (Ho) is assumed to be true



This is like the defendant being presumed to be Not
Guilty
Remember: The American justice system is NOT
based on guilty until proven innocent
We dont assume that our experiment has an effect
until the probability of no effect is too small to
believe
You are the prosecuting attorney - you must provide
evidence beyond a reasonable doubt




NOTE:

Not Guilty
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Innocent
260

Decision Errors
In deciding to Reject or Not, we could make one of
two decision errors
Your Decision

Ho True

Accept Ho

Reject Ho

Correct

Type I
Error
(-Risk)
(

The
Truth

Type II Error
Ho False

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

( -Risk)

Correct

261

Example: A Trial
Jurys Decision
Hes Not Guilty

Actually
Innocent

The
Truth
Actually
Guilty

Correct

Hes Guilty

Type I
Error

Consequence:
Innocent Man
Goes to Jail

(-Risk)
(
Type II Error
( -Risk)

Correct

Consequence: Criminal goes Free


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

262

Stating Problems as Hypotheses


Problem with Centering
Current
Situation

Desired
Precise but not Accurate

LSL

USL

Problem with Spread


Desired

Current
Situation

Accurate but not Precise

LSL

USL

Problem with Centering


or
Problem with Spread

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Hypotheses of
Means

H o:
H 1:
H 2:
Ho:
H 1:
H 2:

o
o
o
o
o
o

=
>
<
=
>
<

1
1
1
1
1
1

Hypotheses of
Standard
Deviations

263

Hypothesis Testing: How It Works


After

data is collected, we calculate both:

a Test Statistic (some form of a signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]


such as a Z- or T-Score), and
a P-Value

The

P-Value is the probability that such results could


occur when Ho is true
The P-Value is based on an assumed or actual
reference distribution (Normal, T-distribution, ChiSquare, F-distribution, etc.)




Small P-Value
Large SNR (e.g., t or Z
statistic)
Ho is Rejected

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013





Large P-Value
Small SNR
Ho is Not Rejected
264

P-Values Are Everywhere !


Normal Probability Plot
H o m o g e n e ity o f V a ria n c e T e s t fo r C o m b o
Factor Levels

95% Confidence Intervals for Sigmas

.999

.99
Bartlett's Test

P-Value

: 0.315

Levene's Test
Test Statistic: 0.925
P-Value

: 0.341

.95

Probability

Test Statistic: 1.009

.80
.50
.20
.05
.01
.001

0.7

1.2

10

11

12

Mach 1

1.7

Average: 10.0799
StDev: 0.943184
N: 25

Anderson-Darling Normality Test


A-Squared: 0.889
P-Value: 0.020

Descriptive Statistics
Variable: Mach 1

One-Way Analysis of Variance


Anderson-Darling Normality Test

Analysis of Variance
Source
DF
SS
Factor
1
0.12
Error
48
53.71
Total
49
53.83

Level
Mach 1
Mach 2

N
25
25

Pooled StDev =

Mean
10.080
9.980
1.058

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

A-Squared:
P-Value:

MS
0.12
1.12

F
0.11

P
0.740
9.0

StDev
0.943
1.161

Individual 95% CIs For Mean


Based on Pooled StDev
--+---------+---------+---------+---(-------------*-------------)
9.5
(--------------*-------------)
--+---------+---------+---------+---9.60
9.90
10.20
10.50

9.5

10.0

10.5

11.0

11.5

12.0

95% Confidence Interval for Mu

0.889
0.020

Mean
StDev
Variance
Skewness
Kurtosis
N

10.0799
0.9432
0.889597
0.511741
-1.14078
25

Minimum
1st Quartile
Median
3rd Quartile
Maximum

8.9821
9.3571
9.7873
10.8440
12.0670

95% Confidence Interval for Mu


9.6906
10.0

10.5

0.7365

95% Confidence Interval for Median

10.4693

95% Confidence Interval for Sigma


1.3121

95% Confidence Interval for Median


9.3855

10.6151

265

Hypothesis and Decision Risk


P Value Is Extremely Important
Remember This Key Saying.
If P is Low , Ho Must Go!

How Low Must P Be ?


It Depends
We would like there to be less than a 10% chance that these
observations could have occurred randomly (A;pha = .10)
Five percent is much more comfortable (Alpha= .05)
One percent feels very good (Alpha = .01)
This alpha level is based on our assumption of no
difference and a reference distribution of some sort
But, it depends on interests and consequences
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

266

Steps in Hypothesis Testing


1. Define the Practical Problem
2. State the Objectives (Create the Statistical Problem)
3. Establish the Hypotheses
- State the Null Hypothesis (Ho)
- State the Alternative Hypothesis (Ha).
4. Decide on appropriate statistical test (assumed probability
distribution, z, t, or F).
5. State the Alpha level (usually 5%)
6. State the Beta level (usually 10-20%)
7. Establish the Effect Size (Delta)
8. Establish the Sample Size

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

267

Steps Continued
9. Develop the Sampling Plan
10. Select Samples
11. Conduct test and collect data
12. Calculate the test statistic (z, t, or F) from the data.
13. Determine the probability of that calculated test statistic occurring by
chance.
14. If that probability is less than alpha, reject Ho and accept Ha. If that
probability is greater than alpha, do not reject Ho. ( Practically Accept
H0)
15. Replicate results and translate statistical conclusion to practical
solution.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

268

Significance Level
Common statement: ... so unlikely ...
You should ask: How unlikely were they?
The answer: The significance level (
)

We would like there to be less than a 10% chance that the


observations could have occurred randomly ( = .10)
Five percent is much more comfortable ( = .05)
One percent feels very good ( = .01)

The alpha level is based on our assumption of no difference


between the observed population and a reference distribution

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

269

Six Sigma Roadmap

Y = f( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ,..., x k )
Remember this simple equation ?
DATA TYPE :Discrete
Counts of Discrete Events ( 1, 2, 3, 4 Defects)
Qualitative Descriptions
Democrat / Republican
Good / Bad
Machine 1 / Machine 2
Continuous
Decimal sub-divisions are meaningful
Time, Weight, Thickness, etc...
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

270

Statistical Tools Roadmap


Something your Stat Professor never showed you


Purpose of roadmap

To give the student a structured approach to statistical


tools
The more you learn about a hammer...
the more everything looks like a nail
Paint the big picture for statistical thinking
Provide a structured way to link Minitab to the tools
Decrease confusion and anxiety
Regression, ANOVA and Chi-Square - Yikes !

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

271

Analyze Roadmap
Single X

Continuous
(Normal)
Continuous (Non
Normal)

Single Y

Discrete

Discrete

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Chi-Square
Test of Proportion

Continuous

Logistic
Regression

Test for Means


Test for
Variances
Regression
Non
Parametric
Tests

272

Test of Comparisons
Y = Continuous

Y = Discrete

Comparison
Type
Against
Standard
Between Two

Mean

Variance

Defective

Defects

1 Sample t

Chi-Square
Test
F-test

1 sample p

1 sample
defect rate
2 sample
defect rate

Among Many

ANOVA

2 Sample t
OR
Paired t

2 Sample p

Bartlett's Test Chi-Square


test

Chi-square

Note: The test mentioned for Y (Continuous) is applicable only when Y follows
Normal Distribution.
In case Y does not satisfy the Normality, then we need to use Non Parametric
tests
For carrying out ANOVA, the condition of Equality of variance has to be
satisfied.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

273

Scenario #1
A Supervisor wants to know if two operators add
significantly different amounts of Material A during the blending process

Whats the Y ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

Whats the X ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

What type of tool would you use ? ________________________

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

274

Scenario #2
The Personnel Department wants to see if there is a link between age
(old and young) and whether that person gets hired

Whats the Y ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

Whats the X ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

What type of tool would you use ? ________________________

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

275

Scenario #3
A team wants to see if there is relationship between
ambient temperature and the viscosity of a material

Whats the Y ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

Whats the X ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

What type of tool would you use ? ________________________

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

276

Scenario #4
For outstanding payment analysis, Sales dept. wants to see if there is a
link between average amount outstanding and dealers.

Whats the Y ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

Whats the X ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

What type of tool would you use ? ________________________

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

277

Scenario #5
For accident analysis, safety dept. wants to see if there is a link
between unit weight per container and injuries to consumers

Whats the Y ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

Whats the X ? _____________

Type of Data ? ______________

What type of tool would you use ? ________________________

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

278

Correlation and
Regression

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

279

Correlation

If two variables X and Y, are related such that as


Y increases / decreases with another variable X, a
correlation is said to exist between them.

A scatter diagram is a chart that pictorially depicts


the relationship between two such data types.
Some Examples of Relationship
Cutting speed and tool life
Moisture content and thread elongation
Breakdown and equipment age
Temperature and lipstick hardness
Striking pressure and electrical current
Temperature and percent foam in soft drinks
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

280

Scatter Diagram of Automotive Speed vs. Mileage

M ileage (km /L it)

40
35
30
25
20
15
25

35

45

55

65

75

Speed (km/h)
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

281

Scatter diagram
A scatter diagram depicts the relationship as a
pattern that can be directly read.
If Y increases with X, then X and Y are positively
correlated.
If Y decreases as X increases, then the two types of
data are negatively correlated.
If no significant relationship is apparent between X
and Y, then the two data types are not correlated.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

282

Correlation (r): The Strength of the Relationship


Y

Strong Positive Correlation


r = .95
R2 = 90%

Moderate Positive Correlation


r = .70
R2 = 49%

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

No Correlation
r = .006
2
R = .0036%

Strong
Negative Correlation
r = -.90
R2 = 81%

Moderate
Negative Correlation
r = -.73
R2 = 53%

Other Pattern No Linear Correlation


r = -.29
R2 = 8%

283

DATA ON CONVEYOR SPEED AND SEVERED LENGTH


Sl. No.

Severed
Length
(mm)
1046

Sl. No.

Conveyor
Speed
(cm/sec)
8.1

16

Conveyor
Speed
(cm/sec)
6.7

Severed
Length
(mm)
1024

7.7

1030

17

8.2

1034

7.4

1039

18

8.1

1036

5.8

1027

19

6.6

1023

7.6

1028

20

6.5

1011

6.8

1025

21

8.5

1030

7.9

1035

22

7.4

1014

6.3

1015

23

7.2

1030

7.0

1038

24

5.6

1016

10

8.0

1036

25

6.3

1020

11

8.0

1026

26

8.0

1040

12

8.0

1041

27

5.5

1013

13

7.2

1029

28

6.9

1025

14

6.0

1010

29

7.0

1020

15

6.3

1020

30

7.5

1022

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

284

Scatter Diagram for Conveyor Speed and Severed Length


1050

S evered L en g th (m m )

1045
1040
1035
1030
1025
1020
1015
1010
1005
1000
5

5.5

6.5

7.5

8.5

Conveyor Speed (cm/sec)

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

285

USES OF SCATTER DIAGRAM

If an increase in Y depends on increase in X, then,


if X is controlled, Y will be naturally controlled.

If X is increased, Y will increase somewhat. Then


Y seems to have causes other than X.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

286

REGRESSION

Regression is the prediction of dependent variable


from knowledge of one or more other independent
variables.

Regression Analysis is a statistical technique for


estimating the parameters of an equation relating
a particular value of dependent variable to a set of
independent variables. The resulting equation is
called Regression Equation.

Linear regression is the regression in which the


relationship is linear.

Curvilinear regression is the regression in which


the best fitting line is a curve.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

287

SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION

Only a single predictor variable or independent


variable X (e.g.: cutting speed) and a response
variable or dependent variable Y (e.g: tool life).

The regression equation is

Y = a+b X

where, Y = Predicted value of Y


a = Intercept (the predicted value of Y when X = 0)
b = Slope of the line (the amount of difference in Y
associated with a 1 - unit difference in X)
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

288

Hypothesis Testing of
Variance

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

289

Objectives


To learn the area of application of the F-Test, or general tests


regarding variance homogeneity.

To know how to find the correct procedure using the Roadmap.

To know the prerequisites for the respective test.

To be able to perform the various tests for variance homogeneity


in Minitab and interpret the results.
To know how to interpret the p-value for a normal distribution
test.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

290

Characteristics of F-Distribution





There is a family of F Distributions.


Each member of the family is determined by two
parameters: the numerator degrees of freedom and
the denominator degrees of freedom.
F cannot be negative, and it is a continuous
distribution.
The F distribution is positively skewed.
Its values range from 0 to . As F the curve
approaches the X-axis.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

When is the F Distribution Used?

The F Distribution is used as the test statistic for


several situations:
- To test whether two samples are from
populations having equal variances
- To compare several population means
simultaneously
In each case populations must be normal and
must have at least interval data
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

292

Variance Homogeneity Applications




In short, there are three main applications for the F-Test:

A prerequisite for performing the 2-sample T-Test.

To examine variance homogeneity during process improvement.


Remember, there are two primary ways to improve processes:

>

Reduce variation

>

Increase tolerances

During variance analysis (ANOVA), will be discussed later.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

293

Test for Equal Variances

For the two tail test, the test statistic is given by:

S
F =
S


2
1
2
2

S12 and S 22 are the sample variances for the two samples.
The null hypothesis is rejected if the computed test
statistic is greater than the critical (table) value with
confidence level / 2 and numerator and denominator
degrees of freedom.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

F-Test
Performing the Test

The F-Test tests two distributions

The calculation can be performed manually using a calculator. The
formula is:

Fcalc = s12/s22
where : s12 = variance of one distribution , s22 = variance of the other
distribution. The larger variance always serves as the numerator.


The critical f-value is read from an f-table, where n-1 equals the
number of degrees of freedom for the numerator and denominator.
If the numerator and denominator have different sampling sizes, the
correct value must be used for each factor.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

295

Example




Open the file compare.mpj


The data must be stacked to perform the test
In Minitab: Stat >ANOVA >Test for Equal Variance
Test for Equal Variances for Response
95% Confidence Intervals for Sigmas

Factor Levels
1

2
2

F-Test
Test Statistic: 0,632

Lev ene's Test


Test Statistic: 0,775

P-Value

P-Value

: 0,505

: 0,390

Boxplots of Raw Data

80

85

Response

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

90

Response
89.7
81.4
84.5
84.8
87.3
79.7
85.1
81.7
83.7
84.5
84.7
86.1
83.2
91.9
86.3
79.3
82.6
89.1
83.7
88.5

Factor
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
296

F-Test
Interpreting the Results


To decide whether to perform the F-Test or Levenes Test, both


samples must be tested for normal distribution.
The calculated F-value is compared with the critical F-value. If the
calculated F-value is greater than the critical F-value, there is a
significant difference between the two distributions. If it is equal to
or less than the critical F-value, there is no statistical difference
between the distributions. They represent the same population.
Both samples are normally distributed. For this reason we interpret
the F-test. Because the P-value at 0.505 is greater than 5%, we do
not determine a difference in the variances of both distributions.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

297

F-Test

F-Test
Test Statistic: 0,632
P-Value

: 0,505

Depending on whether the samples are


normally distributed or not, either the F-test
(both samples normally distributed) or the
Levenes-Test (at least one sample not normally
distributed) must be interpreted.
This means that each sample must be checked
for normal distribution prior to the test.
Stat>basic statistic>normality test

Levene's Test
Test Statistic: 0,775
P-Value

: 0,390

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Because the samples are distributed


normally we interpret the F-test.
We can see no deviation in
variance homogeneity.

298

More than 2 Distributions


The graphic in Minitab looks somewhat different if there are more than 2 distributions
In Minitab: Stat > ANOVA > Test for Equal Variance

Test for Equal Variances for Response


95% Confidence Intervals for Sigmas

Factor Levels
1

Bartlett's Test
Test Statistic: 2,159
P-Value

: 0,340

If the data is
normally
distributed:
Bartletts Test

Levene's Test
Test Statistic: 1,327
P-Value

: 0,291

If the data is not


normally
distributed:
Levenes Test

3
0

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

10

299

Hypothesis Testing of
Means

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

300

Test of Hypotheses Small Samples


What if:
We wanted to compare a sample mean with a
hypothesized population mean
The number of observations were less than 30
The population standard deviation is not known
This would be a one-sample test (because we selected
a single random sample and compared its mean to a ).

We can use the t-distribution as the test statistic

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

301

Characteristics of Students t-Distribution

The t-distribution has the following


properties:

It is continuous, bell-shaped, and symmetrical


about zero like the z-distribution.
There is a family of t-distributions sharing a mean
of zero but having different standard deviations.
The t-distribution is more spread out and flatter at
the center than the z-distribution, but approaches
the z-distribution as the sample size gets larger.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

9-3
9-3

The degrees of
freedom for
the t-distribution
is df = n - 1.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

z-distribution
t-distribution

Testing for the Population Mean: Small Sample, Population Standard


Deviation Unknown

The test statistic for the one sample case is given by:

X
t =
s/ n


The current rate for producing 5 amp fuses at General Electric Co. is
250 per hour. A new machine has been purchased and installed that,
according to the supplier, will increase the production rate. A sample of
10 randomly selected hours from last month revealed the mean hourly
production on the new machine was 256, with a sample standard
deviation of 6 per hour. At the .05 significance level can General
conclude that the new machine is faster?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

EXAMPLE 1 continued
Step 1:

H 0 : 250

H1: > 250

Step 2: Level of Significance .05 (one-tailed test)


Step 3: Select Test Statistic.

X
t =
s/ n

Step 4: Decision Rule...H0 is rejected if t >1.833, df=9 or p


value less than 0.05
Step 5: Compute t, p value using software and decide...

t = [256 250]/[6 / 10] = 316


.
...H0 is rejected. The new machine is faster.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

NOTE

For a two-tail test using the t-distribution, you will


reject the null hypothesis when the value of the
test statistic is greater than
or if it is less than -

t n1, / 2
t n1, / 2

For a left-tail test using the t-distribution, you will


reject the null hypothesis when the value of the
test statistic is less than -

t n1, / 2
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Comparing Two Independent Population Means


(Two-Sample t-Test)


Answers the question: Are the means of the two


samples equal.i.e., Could the two sample
means come from identical populations?
To conduct this test, three assumptions are
required:

The populations must be normally or approximately


normally distributed.
The populations must be independent.
The population variances must be equal.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Pooled Sample Variance and Test Statistic


Here, the two sample variances must be pooled to
form a single estimate of the unknown population
variance (because we assumed equal std dev).

Pooled Sample Variance:


2
1

( n1 1) s + ( n 2 1) s
s =
n1 + n 2 2
2
p

t =

Thus.
Test Statistic:
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

1
1
s
+

n2
n1
2
p

2
2

Pooled Sample Variance and Test Statistic




In the two-sample t-test determining the


Students t is accomplished in three steps:
Step 1: Calculate the sample standard
deviations (s1 and s2)
2

2
(

)
+
(

)
n
1
s
n
1
s
1
1
2
2
s 2p =
n1 + n 2 2

Step 2: Pool the sample variances...


t =

Step 3: Determine t

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

X1 X2
1
1
s
+

n
n
1
2
2
p

309

t-Test
Comparing Two Independent Samples


We will now compare the mean values of two groups. We will


use an attributive factor (input) and quantitative output.
We use the file compare.mtw. The assembly line is compared
with respect to yield both before and after the modification.
There are two ways to enter the data:

Enter the before yield in C1 and the after yield in C2. This
method is called unstacked.
Enter all the values for the yield in C1 and the status in C2.
Minitab identifies C2 as the index variable (subscript).

The second method is preferable. We always want to have


differing variables in different columns and the same variables
in the same columns. There is one column for each input
variable and one column for each output variable.
First we will use the unstacked method, so that we can later
look at the Stack function in Minitab.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

310

EXAMPLE 2


A recent EPA study compared the highway fuel


economy of domestic and imported passenger
cars. A sample of 15 domestic cars revealed a
mean of 33.7 mpg with a standard deviation of
2.4 mpg. A sample of 12 imported cars revealed
a mean of 35.7 mpg with a standard deviation of
3.9. At the .05 significance level can the EPA
conclude that the mpg is higher on the imported
cars? (Let subscript 1 be associated with
domestic cars.)

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

EXAMPLE 2
Step 1:

continued

H 0 : 2 1

H1: 2 > 1

Step 2: Significance Level.. .05


Step 3: Select Test Statistic

t=

X1 X 2
1 1
s +
n1 n2
2
p

Step 4: Formulate Decision Rule...


H0 is rejected if t > 1.708, df = 25 or if p < 0.05
Step 5: Calculate and decide t = 1.64 (Verify.)
H0 is not rejected. There is insufficient sample evidence
to claim a higher mpg on the imported cars.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Exercise - Test on means of Normal Distribution


A petroleum company will soon have to switch a large
proportion of its production from a formulation containing
tetra-ethyl lead to a lead-free formulation. An important
quality characteristic of gasoline is the road octane number. If
gasoline with a road octane number that is too low for the
engine compression is used, excessive knocking will result.
The company has formulated the lead-free product so that its
road octane number should be identical to that of the older,
lead-containing product. An experiment is performed in
which 10 observations on road octane number are obtained for
each product formulation. These data are given in the
following table. Do these data prove that lead-free formulation
is superior to that of formulation containing tetra-ethyl lead?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

313

EXAMPLE-TEST ON MEANS OF NORMAL DISTRIBUTION


Table: Road octane numbers for two gasoline formulations
Formulation 1
(Contains tetra-ethyl lead)
89.5
90.0
91.0
91.5
92.5
91.0
89.0
89.5
91.0
92.0

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Formulation 2
(contains no lead)
89.5
91.5
91.0
89.0
91.5
92.0
92.0
90.5
90.0
91.0

314

Summary: t test to Compare Means, independent Sample


The t test is a hypothesis test to compare means from two
independent samples!

The hypothesis HO states:


Both sample means are identical, i.e. the difference between them is 0
If the P value is small, this hypothesis is rejected and the
means are declared to be different.
A P value is generally described as small if P < 0.5

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

315

Hypothesis Testing Involving Paired Observations




Independent samples are samples that are not related in


any way.
Dependent samples are samples that are paired or
related in some fashion.

For example, if you wished to buy a car you would look at


the same car at two (or more) different dealerships and
compare the prices.

Use the paired t-test when the samples are dependent:


A paired t-test examines whether the mean difference between paired
observations is 0.
The paired t-test can also be used to evaluate whether the mean
difference is equal to a specific value.
Observations must be pairedrelated in some way. For example
-- Weights recorded for individuals before and after an exercise program
-- Measurements taken on the same process with two different
measurement devices.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Paired t-Test...


A paired t-test can answer such questions as:


- Does a new program improve the service level?
- Has a process change resulted in a process improvement?

In a paired t-test
- The data must be continuous
- The data must be random
- The population of the differences should be normally distributed.
- The following test statistic should be used...

Hypothesis Testing Involving Paired Observations


t =

d
sd /

n
Where:

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

is the average of the differences between paired observations

sd

is the standard deviation of the differences

is the number of paired observations


317

Hypothesis Testing Involving Paired Observations




The average of the differences between paired observations, d is


computed using the formula:

d=
n

The standard deviation of the differences, sd, is computed using


the formula:

( d ) 2
d
n
n 1
2

sd

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

318

Paired Comparison
Another good example of paired comparison is the comparison of
measurements performed using an online system, to
measurements performed in a lab using the same samples.
This method is also suitable for examining measurement systems
to determine whether testers obtain the same mean value using the
same samples.
Lets look at the file shoe.mtw.
Were testing shoe material. We have a sample of 10 boys, and
each boy wears two shoes, each of a different material.
In this case, the boys represent blocks.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

319

Paired Comparison

Material Wear and Tear - Shoes

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Boy

Material A

Material B

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

13.2(L)
8.2(L)
10.9(R)
14.3(L)
10.7(R)
6.6(L)
9.5(L)
10.8(L)
8.8(R)
13.3(L)

14.0(R)
8.8(R)
11.2(L)
14.2(R)
11.8(L)
6.4(R)
9.8(R)
11.3(R)
9.3(L)
13.6(R)
320

Paired Comparison
T-Test of the Mean

Test of mu = 0,000 vs mu not = 0,000

Variable
Delta

Mean

StDev

SE Mean

10

-0.410

0.387

0.122

-3.35

0.0085

t-distribution for 9 degrees of freedom


1%

0.4

2.5%

5%

Oserved Value

Prob

0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-4

-3

-2

-1

T-V alue

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

321

The Incorrect Analysis




We are using the same data and will analyze it again, this time by
comparing two independent samples.

Minitab: Stat>Basic Statistics>2-Sample t...


Two Sample T-Test and Confidence Interval
Two sample T for Mtrl A vs Mtrl B
N

Mean

StDev

SE Mean

Mtrl A

10

10.63

2.45

0.78

Mtrl B

10

11.04

2.52

0.80

Why is one analysis


significant and the other
one is not?

95% CI for mu Mtrl A - mu Mtrl B: ( -2.74; 1.92)


T-Test mu Mtrl A = mu Mtrl B (vs not =): T = -0.37 P = 0.72 DF = 18
Both use Pooled StDev = 2.4

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

?
322

Blocking


This was an example of blocking.


The boys within the block form a homogeneous group,
but were different from one another. Some of the boys
were more active than others.
Using blocking, we eliminate the variation between boys
from the test.
Rule: Block whenever possible, randomize in all other
cases.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

323

Example 1
A pharmaceutical dispenser that is supposed to dispense 25 ml of agent
was calibrated to dispense 25 ml quantities into 10 previously-weighed
containers. The actual quantities dispensed were:

25.01 ml, 24.89 ml, 25.10 ml, 24.95 ml, 24.97 ml,
25.04 ml, 25.08 ml, 24.91 ml, 25.07 ml, 24.85 ml

Test the null hypothesis that says the dispenser provides 25 ml agent
against the test hypothesis that this is not the case.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

324

Example 2
Water hardness is measured in order to determine calcium ion concentrations (in
ppm). The hardness of water in hot and cold water lines for a manufacturing
process were measured. A technician objected, stating that warm water was
harder than cold water. The hardness of the various samples is as follows:
Warm water:

133.4,
133.3,

135.4,
136.5,

137.1,
137.6,

138.4,
139.5

136.3,

137.1,

Cold water:

134.1,
135.9,

134.7,
135.6,

136.0,
135.8,

131.7,
132.2

134.7,

135.2,

Test the null hypothesis that the warm and cold water have the same calcium
concentration, against the test hypothesis that warm water has a higher
concentration.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

325

Example 3
A chemical company manufactures paint thinner. The content of ethyl
alcohol in the pint thinner is set at 3%. To determine whether the
manufacturing process has exceeded the 3% threshold, 20 samples of
thinner are taken. The ethyl alcohol concentrations were determined as
follows:

4.2,

5.3,

3.5,

4.3,

3.7,

3.2,

3.5,

2.8,

3.5,

3.7,

2.8,

3.3,

2.7,

3.0,

3.1,

3.0,

3.7,

3.3,

3.4,

2.3

Test the null hypothesis that the process is unchanged (3% ethyl
alcohol), against the test hypothesis that the mean values of the
process are more than 3%.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

326

Example 4
A manufacturer of foils has implemented a new process to reduce the weight of the
product. The foil strength is an important variable affecting the weight. Foils in eight
different strengths were manufactured using both the old and new methods. The weight
(in grams) for each combination is shown below:

Strength

Old Process

New Process

154

152

159

152

169

171

176

167

183

182

199

194

200

204

213

208

Test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in weight between the old and new
process, against the test hypothesis that the new process has reduced the weight of the
foil.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

327

Example 5
Two brands (A and B) of air conditioner dust filters were tested to determine
whether one was better than the other. All filters were tested on the same system,
and the dust quantity (in grams) filtered over a 6 hour period was measured. The
data obtained for the two filters is as follows:

Filter A:

9.1, 11.8,

Filter B: 15.6,

1.5, 7.2,

4.2,

9.6,

8.7, 10.2,

4.4,

7.8, 4.3

9.3, 16.9, 5.1, 14.5, 19.0, 10.3, 12.5, 13.3, 16.1, 2.6

Test the null hypothesis there there is no difference in average dust quantity
filtered against the test hypothesis that one filter is better than the other.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

328

Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA)

Black Belt Training

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Objectives


To know the concept of variance analysis.


To be able to perform simple analyses with 1 and 2 input
factors.

To be able to determine the mathematical model.

To be able to check the model prerequisites.

To determine the practical significance.

To know the concept of blocking and be able to use simple


Randomized Block Designs.
To be able to perform the ANOVA in Minitab and interpret
the results.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

330

ANOVA (Variance Analysis)

Previously, we discussed the testing of hypotheses using 2


mean values (t-Test).
ANOVA is used to test hypotheses with 2 or more mean
values.

Ho: 1 = 2 = 3 = 4
HA: At least one k is different

Advantage:
To test the NULL HYPOTHESIS (all 4 mean values are equal), we would have
to test hypotheses for 6 combinations using the technique previously described
(t-test). Using the ANOVA technique, we can decide whether to reject the null
hypothesis or keep the null hypothesis with a single test.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

331

ANOVA -- Underlying Assumptions

The F distribution is also used for testing the


equality of more than two means using a
technique called analysis of variance
(ANOVA). ANOVA requires the following
conditions:

The populations being sampled are normally


distributed.
The populations have equal standard deviations.
The samples are randomly selected and are
independent.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Questions Asked by ANOVA


Are the average distances achieved with
each dimple pattern the same?
Do the 4 samples come from the same population?

H o : 1 = 2 = 3 = 4
Are some of the 4 population means different?

H 1 : At least one k is different

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

333

Analysis of Variance Procedure

The Null Hypothesis: the population means are the


same.
The Alternative Hypothesis: at least one of the means
is different.
The Test Statistic: F = (between sample variance)
(within sample variance)
Decision rule: For a given significance level , reject
the null hypothesis if F (computed) is greater than F
(table) with numerator and denominator degrees of
freedom.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Example: Comparing More than Two Groups




We are using the example


file Diets.mtw.
Twenty-four animals were
fed using one of four diets.
Diet is the input variable
(factor); blood clotting time
is the output variable
(response).
The diets were assigned to
the animals randomly. Blood
samples were taken and
tested in a random
sequence. Why?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

DIET A

DIET B

DIET C

DIET D

62

63

68

56

60

67

66

62

63

71

71

60

59

64

67

61

65

68

63

66

68

64
63
59

335

Performing ANOVA in Minitab

We perform ANOVA in Minitab


Stat>ANOVA>One-way

One-way Analysis of Variance


Analysis of Variance for Coagtime
Source

DF

SS

MS

Diet

228.00

76.00

13.57

0.000

Error

20

112.00

5.60

Total

23

340.00
Individual 95% CIs For Mean
Based on Pooled StDev

Level

Mean

StDev

---+---------+---------+---------+---

61.000

1.826

(------*------)

66.000

2.828

68.000

1.673

61.000

2.619

(-----*----)
(----*-----)
(----*----)
---+---------+---------+---------+---

Pooled StDev =

2.366

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

59.5

63.0

66.5

70.0

336

ANOVA Table
The ANOVA table is an important result of ANOVA

One-Way Analysis of Variance


Analysis of Variance on Coag Time
Source
Diet

DF
3

SS
228.00

Error

20

112.00

Total

23

340.00

MS

76.00

13.57

0.000

5.60

The F-test is near 1.00 when


the group mean values are
similar. In this case the F-test
is much higher.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

If the p-value is less than 5%,


there is a difference in the
mean value of at least one
group. In this case we reject
the null hypothesis indicating
that the mean values of all
groups are equal. The mean
value of at least one diet is
different from the others.
An F-test of this magnitude
may also occur randomly, but
only at a frequency of 1 per
10,000 occasions. That
corresponds to getting heads
thirteen times in a row with a
fair coin.

337

Main Effects Plots

We use the main effect plot to display our results. It is


displayed only if there is a significant difference.
Minitab: Stat > ANOVA > Main Effects Plot...
Main Effects Plot - Data Means for Coagtime

Caution:
line is without
warranty

68
67

Coagtime

66
65
64
63
62
61
1

Diet

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

338

Lets Try This Example




A golf ball designer needs to choose between 4 dimple patterns and


is concerned with their effect on the distance a golf ball travels.
There are 24 golf balls with 4 dimple patterns.
Dimple pattern is the Input variable; Distance traveled is the output
variable.
Golf balls were assigned randomly to Iron Byron who was using the
USGA approved test driver. The golf balls were tested in random
order. (Why?)
Dimple 1

Dimple 2

Dimple 3

Dimple 4

277

281

304

250

268

299

295

277

281

317

317

268

263

286

299

272

290

304

281

295

304

286
281
263

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

339

Hypothesis Testing of
Proportion
Black Belt Training

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

1 Proportion Test

vs

target
value

P
Practical Question
(example)

Is the population proportion


statistically different from the
target value?

Statistical Question
Ho : P = target value
Ha : P target value

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

341

Comparing Two Proportions




This test is used to determine if the process defect rate (or


proportion, p) of one sample differs by a certain amount D from
that of another sample (e.g., before and after your improvement
actions)
The hypotheses:
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
Ha: p1 - p2 0
The test statistic is calculated as follows:
Z

obs

p
p (1 p

p
)(1 n
1

2
1

+ 1

where
p =

X
n

1
1

+ X
+ n

2
2

This is compared to Zcritical = Z/2

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

342

Product A
Product B

East

West

32

135

32

80

42

98

Product C

Chi Square - Test For Independence

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Remember this Example?


The Personnel Department wants to see if there is a link between age
(old and young) and whether that person gets hired
Got Hired
Whats the Y ? _____________

Discrete
Type of Data ? ______________

Age
Whats the X ? _____________

Discrete
Type of Data ? ______________

Chi-Square
What type of tool would you use ? ________________________

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

344

The Data

Total

Hired

Not Hired

Old

30

150

180

Young

45

230

275

Total

75

380

455

How Do You Make The Decision Here?


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

345

The Hypothesis
With the Chi-Square Test for Independence,
statisticians assume most variables in life are
independent, therefore:
Ho:

Data is Independent (Not Related)

Ha:

Data is Dependent (Related)

If the P Value is <.05 , then reject Ho

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

346

Step #1
We must develop an Observed Frequency Table by
breaking our 2 variables into different levels:
Age: Old & Young
Hiring Practices: Hired & Not Hired

We then collect data to perform the analysis.


Hired

Not Hired

Old

30

150

Young

45

230

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

347

Step #2
Calculate Column & Row Totals

Hired

Not Hired

Total

Old

30

150

180

Young

45

230

275

Total

75

380

455

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

348

Step #3
Develop an expected frequency table. That is, what should
this table look like if these if these 2 factors are really
independent?

Hired

Not Hired

Old
Young

How do we do that?
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

349

Step #3 Continued
Develop an expected frequency table. That is, what should this table
look like if these if these 2 factors are really independent?
Hired
Old

75 x 180
455

= 29.6

Not Hired

Total

___

180

Young

___

___

275

Total

75

380

455

Cells expected frequency is:


(Column Total) * (Row Total)
Grand Total
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

350

Step #3 Continued
29.6 is what we would expect if the 2 factors are really independent

Hired

Not Hired

Total

Old

29.6

150.3
___

180

Young

45.3
___

Total

75

___
229.7

275

380

455

You finish the table!


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

351

Step #4
Subtract the expected value from the observed (O-E)

Hired

Not Hired

Total

Old

30-29.6=.4

-0.3
___

180

Young

___
-0.3

___
0.3

275

Total

75

380

455

You finish the table!


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

352

Step #5
Square the Differences (O-E)^2

Hired
Old

(.4)*(.4)=.16

Not Hired

Total

.09
___

180

Young

___
.09

___
.09

275

Total

75

380

455

You finish the table!


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

353

Step #6
Compute the Relative Squared Differences (O-E)^2 / E

Hired
Old
Young
Total

.16 / 29.6 = .005


___
.002

75

Not Hired

Total

.0006
___

180

___
.0004

275

380

455

You finish the table!


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

354

So What?
The sum of the relative squared differences is
distributed as a Chi Square distribution!

If there is independence, we expect the difference to


be close to 0. The further away we are, the more likely the
variables are dependent. To help us make that decision, we will
rely on the P value.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

355

Chi Square Test For


Independence
Collect Data
Run Minitab
Tables
Chi-Square
Command

Evaluate The
P Value

Examine
Contingency
Table

Make
Decision

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

356

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

357

Analyzing The Data In Minitab


Chi-Square Test

Expected counts are printed below


observed counts

Hired Not Hire


30
150
29.67
150.33

Total
180

45
45.33

230
229.67

275

Total

75

380

455

Chi-Sq =

0.004 + 0.001 +
0.002 + 0.000 = 0.007
DF = 1, P-Value = 0.932

Note:
The observed and expected
counts are the same values you
calculated a moment ago

What Decision Would You Make?

A P-Value !

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

358

Another Example . . .
Hired

Not Hired

Old

45

135

Young

45

230

What Decision Would You Make?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

359

Chi-Square Comments
Chi-Square is the least insightful and usually one of
the more difficult to analyze tools we learned this
week. But that is what happens when we deal with
attribute data.
You must have at least FIVE expected frequencies for the
Chi-Square Test to work or Minitab will crash.
Your data should have been gathered to assure
randomness. Beware of other hidden factors (Xs).

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

360

Excercise 1
A) You determine the faulty orders from 2 regions.
Faulty Orders

Correct Orders

Region 1

110

420

Region 2

110

400

Is there a difference between the regions? P = .........


B) You receive additional information regarding the faulty orders.
Error 1

Error 2

Correct Orders

Region 1

90

20

420

Region 2

60

50

400

Is there a difference between the regions? P = ..........


What are your conclusions?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

361

Design of Experiment

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

362

STATISTICALLY DESIGNED EXPERIMENTS


A statistically designed experiment permits simultaneous consideration of all


the possible factors that are suspected to have bearing on the quality
problem under investigation and as such even if interactions effect exist, a
valid evaluation of the main effect can be made. Scanning a large number
of variables is one of the ready and simpler objectives that a statistically
designed experiment would fulfill in many problem situations.
Even a limited number of experiments would enable the experimenter to
uncover the vital factors as which further trials would yield useful results.
The approach has number of merits, it is quick, reliable and efficient.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

363

Objectives Of Experimentation
The following are some of the objectives of experimentation in an
industry :







Improving efficiency or yield


Finding optimum process settings
Locating sources of variability
Correlating process variables with product characteristics
Comparing different processes, machines, materials etc
Designing new processes and products.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

364

Design of experiments

Design of experiments (DOE) is a valuable tool to optimize product and


process designs, to accelerate the development cycle, to reduce
development costs, to improve the transition of products from research and
development to manufacturing and to effectively trouble shoot manufacturing
problems. Today, Design of Experiments is viewed as a quality technology to
achieve product excellence at lowest possible overall cost.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

365

Traditional approach
One-factor-At-A-Time
This is a traditional method of experimentation which tests, then changes, one factor
at a time to allow for observation and comparison. Note on the example below, all 8
factors are varied one-at-a-time . It is efficient because it takes only 16 runs.
A1 and A2 are evaluated by comparing Result - 1 and Result - 2
B1, B2 and B3 are evaluated by comparing Result-2, Result-3 and Result-4.
C1, C2, and C3 are evaluated by comparing Result-4, Result-5 and Result-6
Etc.
Run No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

A
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

B
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

C
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

D
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

E
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

F
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
3

G
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3

H
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3

Re sult
Result 1
Result 2
Result 3
Result 4
Result 5
Result 6
Result 7
Result 8
Result 9
Result 10
Result 11
Result 12
Result 13
Result 14
Result 15
Result 16

366

Traditional approach





Problem: Current Car gas mileage is 20 mpg. Would like to


get 30 mpg.
We might try:
> Change brand of gas
> Change octane rating
> Drive Slower
> Tune-up Car
> Wash and wax car
> Buy new tires
> Change Tire Pressure
What if it works?
What if it doesnt?

Survey Says These variables greatly effect MPG


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

367

One-Factor-At-A-Time
Problem: Fuel economy we want is 30 MPG
Try changing each input variable at two settings believed to be
associated with dramatically changing fuel economy. See what
happens.
Speed
55
60
60
60

Octane
85
85
90
85

Tire Pressure
30
30
30
35

MPG
23
29
23
24

How many more Combinations would you need to figure out the best
combination of variables? (3 Variables at two settings; 2x2x2 = 8 total)
How can you explain the above results? (Combination 2 is the answer)
If there were more variables, how long would it take to get a good solution?
(Multiply by another 2 for each one)
What if theres a specific combination of two or more variables that leads to
the best mileage? (Too hard for me to figure out; What do you think?)
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

368

Full Factorial Experiment


Problem: Want 30 MPG

Speed
55
60
55
60
55
60
55
60

Octane
85
85
90
90
85
85
90
90

Tire Pressure
30
30
30
30
35
35
35
35

MPG
23
29
37
23
37
24
30
36

OFAT Runs

What conclusion do you make now?


(Murphy is alive and well!)
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

369

TERMINOLOGY USED IN D.O.E.


EXPERIMENT: A planned set of operations which leads to a corresponding set of
observations. The purpose of experimentation is to ensure that the experimenter
obtains the data relevant to the task of decision making in an economical way.

OUTCOME (RESPONSE): The numerical result of a trial based on a given treatment


combination is called Outcome or Response.
The response may be :

Continuous or measurement type and follows a normal distribution


Continuous or measurement type but does not follow normal distribution
Discrete or count type and does not follow normal distribution

E.g.: diameter of a shaft, No. of rejected cylinders etc.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

370

TERMINOLOGY USED IN D.O.E.


FACTOR (X) - The parameters of the process which are deliberately varied from trial
to trial. This could be qualitative or quantitative. e.g. Speed, feed, coolant rate,
operator skill.

LEVELS OF A FACTOR - The alternative values of a factor considered in the

experiment are called its levels.


e.g.: Speed 400 rpm, circular wheel etc.
TREATMENT COMBINATION - The set of levels of all factors employed in a given trial
is called treatment or treatment combination.

EXPERIMENTAL UNIT : It is a generic term used to denote the group of material to


which a treatment is applied in a single trial of the experiment.
BALANCED TEST - Where number of samples in each treatment combination is same.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

371

TERMINOLOGY USED IN D.O.E.


EFFECT OF FACTOR :
MAIN EFFECT: The change in the average response produced by a change in the
level of the factor is called Main Effect of that factor.

INTERACTION EFFECT : If the effect of one factor is different at different levels of


another factor, the two factors are said to interact (or) to have interaction.
The interaction between factors A and B, is termed as First Order Interaction or
Two Factor Interaction and is denoted by AxB.
If the interaction between two factors A and B, is different at different levels of a
third factor C, then there is said to be interaction among three factors. This is
referred to as Second Order Interaction or Three Factor Interaction and is
denoted by AxBxC.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

372

TERMINOLOGY USED IN D.O.E.


Interactions


Y = f (X1, X2). But if X2 = f (X1)

Then changing X1 will give other than predicted Y since X2 also


automatically changes.


The same holds true for change of x2

e.g: leakage of dome welded components is a function of current and


electrode thickness but current also depends on electrode thickness.
Hence there is interaction between electrode and current

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

373

TERMINOLOGY USED IN D.O.E.


An example to understand interaction
F
I
N
I
S
H
Speed X

Speed Y

Changing feed from level A to level B betters finish.


But this effect is more predominant speed level Y than speed level X.
Hence there is an interaction between speed & feed
REPLICATION: Replication is a repetition of the whole experiment in order to
estimate experimental error, increase precision (detect smaller changes).

EXPERIMENTAL ERROR: The failure of two identically treated experimented


units to give the same value.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

374

STEPS IN DESIGNING AND ANALYZING


1. Statement of the problem.
2. Formulation of hypothesis.
3. Planning of the experiment.
a) Choosing an appropriate experimental technique.
b) Examination of possible outcomes to make sure that the experiment
provides the required information.
c) Consideration of possible results from the point of view of statistical
analysis.

4. Collection of data, after performing the experiment according


to the plan.
5. Statistical Analysis of the data.
6. Drawing conclusions with appropriate level of significance.
7. Verification or evaluation of results (conclusions).
8. Drawing final conclusions and recommendations.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

375

PLANNING FOR EXPERIMENTATION


The various steps to be followed in this direction are listed below :


Selection of area of study : Pareto analysis

Proof of the need for experimentation

Brain storming and Cause & Effect diagram : To list all the possible factors

Classification of factors

Interactions to be studied

Response and type of model for analysis

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

376

Classification of factors
Tools like brainstorming and cause & effect diagrams helps in identification of
factors and preparing a complete list of the factors involved in any experiment.
Factors listed can be classified into three categories :

1. Experimental Factors
Experimental factors are those which we really experiment with by varying them at
various levels.

2. Control Factors
Control Factors are those which are kept at a constant (controlled) level throughout
experimentation.

3. Error or Noise Factors


Error or Noise factors are those which can neither be changed at our will nor can
be fixed at one particular level. Effect of these factors causes the error component
in the experiment and as such these factors are termed as error or noise factors.

Note : At the planning stage itself all the factors viz. Experimental, Control and error should
be recognized. This will help to tackle them appropriately during experimentation.
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

377

A WORD OF ADVICE



It is observed that only 2 to 6 variables end up being vital few.


Try to keep the design simple by utilizing your experience to decide
which are the most likely factors unless you know nothing of the
process.
The above calls for judgement which sometimes can be wrong.

REMEMBER:

The Experiment is Run to Understand


Reality, Not the Data
Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Full Factorial Experiments

Wear of pin is an important criteria in affecting field life of


a component.
It is believed that hardness of pin is an important
parameter affecting it.
Hence experiments are carried out to check wear on :

Pin of hardness in range of 60 - 62 RC

Pin of hardness in range of 66 - 68 RC

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

379

Seek the answers to the following questions

What is your response ?

How many Factors [f] ?

How many Levels [L] ?

The experiment is Lf

How many combinations/runs are possible ?

How many runs do you plan to carry out ?

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

380

SEEK THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS




What is the response ?

Wear

How many Factors [f] ?

How many Levels [L] ?

The experiment is Lf

How many combinations/runs are possible ?

How many runs do we plan to carry out ?


replication]

4 [Taking 2

2
21

HENCE IT IS A 21 FULL FACTORIAL.


Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

381

22 Full factorial experiments




It is believed that pin wear depends on


Hardness
Oil flow
The levels of hardness are
60 - 62 Rc
66 - 68 Rc
The levels of oil flow is
20 cc / min
120 cc / min

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

382

22 Full factorial experiments







Number of Factors :
Number of Levels :
Possible Runs :
Nos. we plan to carry out:

2
2
22
4

Hence it is a 22 full factorial experiment.


Similarly you have 23 and 24 full factorial experiments for 3 and 4
factors respectively.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

383

EXAMPLE- 22 FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT


Consider a chemical process of Silicate Mfg. It is felt that
Temperature and Concentration are the contributors to increase
residue.
The factors and levels are as below

Factor -1

+1

Temp.

40C

80C

Conc.

Low

High

-1 signifies one level (normally lower) and +1 signifies the other level
(normally higher)

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

22 Full factorial experiments




It is now believed that residue depends on concentration of Acid and Temperature of bath.

RUN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

CONC.
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High

TEMP.
40
40
40
40
80
80
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
80
80

RESIDUE
20.4
19.3
17.6
16.3
9.7
16.4
14.8
12.3
17.4
17.7
23.2
20.4
15
24
15.6
15.2

385

WHAT DO WE WANT TO FIND ?




We want to find that


Does concentration and temperature have any effect on residue.
Of concentration and temperature which is more important .
What is the ideal and feasible level of the process settings.
Does any interaction exist between temperature and concentration.
Is there any problem with data or model adequate ?

How Do We Find This. ?


Let us do together using MINITAB

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

386

EXAMPLE- 23 FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT


Consider another setup of surface cleaning. It is felt that Time, Temp.
and Conc. are the contributors.
The factors and levels are as below

Factor -1

+1

Temp.

R.T.

90C

Time

3 mins 10 mins

Conc.

Low

High

-1 signifies one level (normally lower) and +1 signifies the other level
(normally higher)

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

EXAMPLE- 23 FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT


HOW MANY FACTORS?

HOW MANY LEVELS?

HOW MANY RUNS WOULD BE THERE IDEALLY?

HOW MANY YOU PLAN TO RUN?

WHICH EXPERIMENT?
23 FULL FACTORIAL EXPERIMENT

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

388

EXAMPLE: THE PROBABLE COMBINATIONS ARE

NO. TEMP.
1
RT
2
90
3
RT
4
90
5
RT
6
90
7
RT
8
90





TIME
3 mins
3 mins
10 mins
10 mins
3 mins
3 mins
10 mins
10 mins

CONC.
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
High
High

This is called an array


Since it contains all possible combinations. It is a full factorial array
It is also called orthogonal array
If columns are orthogonal we can estimate the effect of a variable independent of the other
variables

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Designing the Experiment


The Design out put along with the data obtained after conducting experiment.
StdOrder RunOrder CenterPt Blocks Tempareture Time Concentration Response
1
1
1
1
RT
3mins
Low
65
11
2
1
1
RT
10 mins
Low
43
13
3
1
1
RT
3mins
High
61
12
4
1
1
90
10 mins
Low
45
5
5
1
1
RT
3mins
High
58
15
6
1
1
RT
10 mins
High
50
3
7
1
1
RT
10 mins
Low
50
7
8
1
1
RT
10 mins
High
52
10
9
1
1
90
3mins
Low
42
8
10
1
1
90
10 mins
High
41
14
11
1
1
90
3mins
High
43
9

12

RT

3mins

Low

65

16

13

90

10 mins

High

45

14

90

3mins

High

45

15

90

10 mins

Low

41

16

90

3mins

Low

44

Note here the second column gives the run order on which the experiment
has to be conducted.

Six Sigma GB Material Oct 2013

Вам также может понравиться