Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 60

BY:

ABHISEK PANDA
3.6

SUPER STRUCTURE DESIGN:

3.6.1 AVAILABLE DATA:

Effective span of T-beam bridge: 18.33m


Total length of bridge: 55m
Clear width of carriage way 7.5m (IRC 5: 1998 & IRC 6: 2014)
Kerb width: 600mm (both side, pedestrians are allowed)
Parapet: 1000 mm 150 mm 150 mm @ 1.5m c/c with 3-cast iron pipes as
railing
Camber: 1 in 100 (37.5 mm at center linearly varying to zero at kerbs)
Wearing coat: 80mm
Kerb height above pavement: 200mm (insurmountable type)
Kerb type: full safety ensured
Total kerb height above deck slab: 280 mm
Clear depth of Longitudinal girders: 1400 mm
Width of longitudinal girder: 400mm
Width of cross girder: 300mm
Clear depth of cross girder: 1400 mm
Deck slab thickness: 250 mm
Cantilever slab: 400 mm at girder face; linearly varying @ 0.11 to ends i.e.
200 mm
Total overall depth of the super structure: 1800mm
c/c spacing of longitudinal girders: 2500 mm
c/c spacing of cross girders: 4507.50 mm
clear distance of cantilever span from face of girder: 1800mm
Grade of concrete: M35
Design strength: fcd = 0.67fck/mMPa (Annex A2 of IRC 112: 2011)
Grade of steel : Fe415 (IS 1786 : 2000)
Design strength of steel : fy/1.15 = 0.87fy MPa (clause-15.2.3.3 of IRC
112:2011)
Poissons ratio: = 0.2 (Annex-B; B-3-1 of IRC 112:2011 )
Analysis of deck slab: Piegauds curve

3.6.2 DESIGN OF INTERIOR SLAB PANEL:


The slab is supported on four sides by longitudinal and cross girders which c/c
spacing is as shown in the figure above. The slab thickness is 250 mm and
breadth and length respectively are 2.5m and 4.5075 m. the effective span will be

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
taken as the clear span of the slabs since these are the continuous slabs. So
effective width Beff = 2.1m and effective length Leff = 4.2075m.

Fig-7 (Interior Slab Panel with one wheel of Tracked Vehicle)


3.6.2.1

Bending Moment of the Slab Panel due to Dead Load:

Weight of slab = 0.25 1 1 25 = 6.25 kN/m2


Weight of wearing coat = 0.080 22 1 1 = 1.76 kN/m2
Weight of camber = 0.45 kN/m2
Total dead weight = 8.46 kN/m2
As Pieguads curve is used in design,
hence K = B/L = 2.5/4.5075 = 0.55
Also dead load moment is to be computed and hence u/B = 1.0 and v/L = 1.0
Using Pieguads curve for K=0.5, u/B = 1.0 and v/L=1.0,
m1=0.047 and m2=0.004
Also for K=0.6, u/B = 1.0 and v/L = 1.0,
m1=0.047 and m2 = 0.016
After interpolation, we find that m1=0.047 and m2=0.0145
Total dead load on the slab is given by = 8.46 2.54.5075 = 95.33

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Short span moment is MB = 95.33 (0.047+0.200.0145) = 4.76 kN-m
Long span moment is ML = 95.33 (0.0145+0.200.047) = 2.28 kN-m
Since these are continuous slabs, a continuity factor of 0.8 will be multiplied. So
final end moment is given by MBF = 3.81 kN-m and MBL = 1.824 kN-m
3.6.2.2

Bending Moment due to Live Load:

a. IRC class AA tracked Vehicle:


The wheel is placed at the center of the slab as shown in the figure previously. For
maximum bending moment to be occurred, the load dispersion is taken to be
occurring through wearing coat only. The load is disperses at 45 0 through the
wearing coat as per Annex-B of IRC 112:2011.
Hence u = 0.85+20.080 = 1.01m and v = 3.60 + 20.080 = 3.76m
Hence u/B = 0.404 , v/L = 0.8342 and K = B/L = 2.5/4.5075 = 0.55.
Referring to Pieguads curve,
For K = 0.5, and for above u/B and v/L values,
m1 = 0.084 , m2 = 0.009
Similarly for K = 0.6, we get
m1 = 0.095 and m2 = 0.03
After interpolating, we get
m1 = 0.089 and m2 = 0.019
Short span bending moment is given by, (taking continuity into account)
MB = 0.8350(0.089+0.20.019) = 25.984 kN-m
ML = 0.8 350(0.019+0.20.089) = 10.304 kN-m
As per IRC 6:2010, clause 208.3, for tracked vehicles, the impact factor is 10%
for spans up to 40m.
So MB = 28.58 kN-m and ML = 11.334 kN-m
b. IRC class-AA wheeled vehicle:
Following different references and guides on bridge engineering, its clearly
understood that though tracked vehicle gives the severest effect along short
span/direction but along long span, the wheeled vehicle gives severest effect. By
going through Essentials of Bridge Engineering: D.J Victor and R.C.C design:
B.C. Punmia, A.K Jain and A.K Jain we find the following load positioning gives the
severest effect among other combinations.

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-8 (Loading of wheeled vehicle for severest effect)


Also as per IRC 6:2014 specifications, no other vehicles can come on to the panel
during the above arrangement.
Bending Moment calculation due to Wheel Load -2:
Tyre contact dimension : 300 mm 150 mm
So u = 0.3+20.080 = 0.460 m and v = 0.15+20.080 = 0.310 m
The value of u/B = 0.184 , v/L = 0.069 and B/L = 0.55
Using Pieguads curve, m1 = 0.22 and m2 = 0.20
Hence MB1 = 62.5 (0.22+0.20.2) = 16.25 kN-m and ML1 = 62.5(0.2+0.220.2) =
15.25 kN-m
Bending Moment due to Wheel Load -1
Since Pieguads curve is applicable to only symmetrical loading pattern, it cannot
be used directly for unsymmetrical loading. In order to calculate the moment, a
dummy load having equal magnitude will be arranged at equal distance as per
real load from the center of slab or from the vertical axis of the slab. The
arrangement is shown in the figure.

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-9 (Bending moment calculation due to Wheel Load-1)


So u = 2(u1 + x) = 2(0.46+0.37) = 1.66m and v = 0.31m
Load intensity = 37.5/(.31.46) = 262.973 kN/m2
K = B/L = 0.55, u/B = 0.664 and v/L = 0.069
Hence m1 = 0.12 and m2 = 0.14
MB = (0.12+0.20.14)262.9731.660.31 = 20.03 kN-m
Similarly ML = 22.193 kN-m

Now u = 2x = 20.37 = 0.74 and v = 0.31


K = 0.55, u/B = 0.296 and v/L = 0.069
From Pieguads curve, m1 = 0.184 and m2 = 0.189
MB = 13.38 kN-m and ML = 13.622 kN-m

Hence total moment is given by,


MB2 = (20.03 13.38) 0.5 kN-m = 3.325 kN-m
ML2 = (22.193 13.622) 0.5 kN-m = 4.285 kN-m
Bending Moment due to Wheel Load-3:

Now in this case u = 2(0.46+0.77) = 2.46m , v = 0.31 m


Load intensity is 62.5/(.31.46) = 438.3 kN/m2
K = 0.55, u/B = 0984 and v/L = 0.069
From Pieguads curve, m1 = 0.09 and m2 = 0.09
MB = 36.10 kN-m and ML = 36.10 kN-m

Taking u = 2x = 20.77 = 1.54 and v = 0.31,


K = 0.55, u/B = 0.616 and v/L = 0.069
Hence m1 = 0.125 and m2 = 0.14
MB = 32.01 kN-m and ML= 34.52 kN-m

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
MB3 = [36.10 - 32.01] 0.5 = 2.045 kN-m
ML3 = [36.10 - 34.52] 0.5 = 0.79 kN-m
Bending Moment due to Wheel Load at - 5:

u =0.46m, v = 2(v1+x) = 2(0.31 + 1.045) = 2.71m


Load intensity = 62.5/(0.460.31) = 438.3 kN/m2
K = 0.55, u/B = 0.184, v/L = 0.60
So m1 = 0.125 and m2 = 0.0306
MB = 71.57 kN-m and ML = 30.35 kN-m
u = 0.46m and v = 2x = 21.045 = 2.09m
K = 0.55, u/B = 0.184 and v/L = 0.464
From Pieguads curve, m1 = 0.1441 and m2 = 0.043
MB = 64.30 kN-m and ML = 30.25 kN-m
So MB = 3.635 kN-m and ML = 0.05 kN-m
Bending Moment due to wheel Load at 4:

u = 2(u1+x) = 2(0.46+0.37) = 1.66m and v = 2(v1+y) = 2(0.31+1.045) =


2.71m
K = 0.55, u/B = 0.664 and v/L = 0.601
Coefficient m1 = 0.09205 and m2 = 0.027
After multiplying with (u1+x)(v1+y) with both coefficients,
m1 = 0.1015 and m2 = 0.0304

u = 2x = 20.37 = 0.74m, v = 2y = 21.045 = 2.09m


K = 0.588, u/B = 0.296 and v/L = 0.464
So m1 = 0.134 and m2 = 0.0405
Multiplying with xy,
we get m1=0.052 and m2 = 0.016

u = 0.74m, v = 2.71m
K = 0.55, u/B = 0.296 and v/L = 0.601
m1 = 0.12 and m2 = 0.03 and multiplying with x(v1+y) = 0.5013,
m1 = 0.060 and m2=0.015

u =1.66 m and v = 2.09m


K = 0.55, u/B = 0.664 and v/L = 0.464
m1 = 0.095 and m2 = 0.038

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Multiplying with y(u1+x) = 0.87,
m1=0.083 and m2 =0.033
So m1 = [(0.1015+0.052)-(0.060+0.083)] = 0.0105
m2 = [(0.0304+0.016)-(0.015+0.033)] 0
MB4 =

37.5
[0.0105+0.20] = 2.761 kN-m
0.46 0.31

ML4 =

37.5
[0.20.0105+0] = 0.552 kN-m
0.46 0.31

Bending Moment due to Wheel Load at -6:

1 u = 2[u1+x] = 2[0.46+0.77] = 2.46 m and v = 2[v1+x] = 2[0.31+1.045] =


2.71 m
K = 0.55, u/B = 0.984 and v/L = 0.601
m1 = 0.068, m2 = 0.02
[u1+x][v1+y] = 1.231.355 = 1.67
m1=0.113 and m2 = 0.0334
2 u = 2x =1.54m and v = 2y = 2.09m
K=0.55, u/B = 0.616 and v/L = 0.464
m1 = 0.097, m2 = 0.038
xy = 0.804
Hence m1 = 0.078 and m2 = 0.0305
3 u = 2[u1+x] = 2.46m and v = 2y =2.09m
K = 0.55, u/B = 0984 and v/L = 0.464
m1 =0.074 and m2 = 0.03
y(u1+x) = 1.285
m1 = 0.095 and m2=0.038
4 u = 2x = 1.54m and v = 2(v1+y) = 2.71m
K = 0.55, u/B = 0.616 and v/L = 0.6012
m1 = 0.092 and m2 = 0.025
Multiplying x(v1+y) = 1.043 with above coefficients,
m1 = 0.096 and m2 = 0.026
So final coefficients are,
m1 = [(0.113+0.078)-(0.095+0.096)] = 0
m2 = [(0.0334+0.0305)-(0.038+0.026)] 0
The resulting moment is given by,
MB6 = ML6 = 0 kN-m
Total bending moment is given by,

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
MB= 16.25+3.325+2.045+3.635+2.761 = 28.016 kN-m
ML = 15.25+4.285+0.79+0.05+0.552 = 20.93 kN-m
Applying continuity and impact,
MB = 28.016 0.8 1.18 = 26.45 kN-m
ML = 20.93 0.8 1.18 = 19.76 kN-m
The impact factor is taken as 18% as per clause-208.4 of IRC 6: 2014. It can be
seen that the moment along short span for tracked load is greater while the wheel
load bending moment along the longer span is severer. Hence the moment for
tracked load will be taken along shorter direction and moment along longer
direction will be considered from wheel load in the design of deck slab.
3.6.3 WIND LOAD ANALYSIS:
Since the structure is open in longitudinal cross section and it has all possibilities
that it will be drowned inside water up to HFL level during storm; as the storm
occurs in the tropical region especially in India during rainy season most of the
times. Hence there is no need to consider the lateral wind force. But still
considering worst condition, lets calculate the uplift force. IS 875 (part-III) : 1987
will be used for this purpose.
As per clause-5.3, IS 875 (part - III):1987 says that
design wind speed is given by , Vz = Vbk1k2k3
Vb = 50 m/sec (Appendix -A) = 180 kmph (for Bhubaneswar zone)
As per clause 5.3, the wind speed is considered constant up to the height of 10m
of any structure.
k1 = 1.08 (Table-1), k2 = 1.00 (Table-2, Category -2, class - A) and k3 = 1 ( = 00,
clause 5.3.3.1)
Hence Vz = 180 1.08 1.00 1.00 = 194.40 kmph 200kmph = 55.56 m/sec
Using clause- 5.4,
pz = 0.6Vz2 = 0.6 (55.56)2 = 1852.15 N/m2 = 1.85 kN/m2
The solidity ratio is equal to 00 in our case. Hence = 00
From table-7 (page -19), taking = 00and = 00 ,
C1 = (-)1.4 = 1.4 (suction)
As per clause 6.2.2.7 (page - 27) for overhangs sloping upward, C2 = 0.75 and
the positive sign indicates that this will be acting downward. Hence total pressure

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
force per unit run on the slab will be calculated separately for the cantilever and
intermediate road way section.

Fig-10 (Wind load on Super Structure)


The
pressure
distribution
is
as
shown
in
the
figure.
Fuplift/m run = C1pzA = 1.4 .85 4.2 18.33/18.33 = 10.878 kN/m
Fdownward/m run = C2pzA = 0.75 1.85 3.6 18.33/18.33 = 4.995 kN/m 5kN/m
Hence it can be seen that the cantilever section will not be experiencing any uplift
force and the wind pressure will be in the same direction as that of the live load.
Also it can be noted that as per clause 212.5 of IRC 6: 2014, no live load will be
considered on the deck when wind speed exceeds 130 kmph.
Now the longitudinal girders can be seen as loaded as below figure for
intermediate spans.

Fig-11 (Wind load acting Longitudinally on Super Structure)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Total
upward
force
acting
on
one
slab
panel
is
given
by,
10.878 4.2075 = 45.77 kN << 95.33 0.8 = 76.264 kN (dead load of slab panel).
Hence it can be concluded that since uplift pressure is lesser than the dead weight
of slab panel itself, no danger of negative suction and hence wind pressure need
not be considered. Also as the elevated area of the slab panel is quite less, there
is no danger of lateral pressure. Hence this can be omitted.
3.6.4 SHEAR FORCE CALCULATION FOR INTERIOR SLAB PANEL:
3.6.4.1

Wheel Load Shear:

Following IRC-112:2011 (B-3.3, Annex- B-3), the dispersion of load through


wearing coat & slab will be at 45.
Hence dispersion of load is given by 0.85+2(0.08+0.25) =1.51m.
For maximum shear to occur , the load dispersion should be within face of girder.
So wheel load will be kept at least 1.51/2=0.755m from the longitudinal girder
face; as shown in the figure.

Fig-12 (Load dispersion through deck slab)


Referring IRC-112:2011,clause-B 3.2(page-278),
bef =a( 1 a/ l0)+b1
4.2075
b/l0 =
= 2.003 > 2.00
2.1
=2.6
l0=2.1
a=0.755m
b1=3.6+2
0.08=3.76m
be=2.6 0.755( 1 0.755/2.1 )+3.76
=5.017m
Load per meter width is

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
350
5.017

= 69.763

69.763 ( 2.1 0.755 )


2.1
=44.681 kN/m
Shear force with impact due to tracked vehicle = 49.15 kN/m
3.6.4.2
Dead load shear:
Maximum shear force =

Total dead weight= 8.46 KN/m2


8.46 2.1
Total dead load shear=
= 8.883 kN/m
2
3.6.5 DESIGN BENDING MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE:
Toal MB = 3.81+28.58=32.39 KN-m
Ml = 1.824+19.76=21.584 KN-m
Total shear force=(8.883+49.15) KN/m
=58.03 KN/m
Since we have considered limit state method the above load values will be 1.5
times that of calculated as per Anex A2 of IRC: 112-2011
So MB = 48.585
50 kN-m
Ml = 32.376
33 kN-m
Vu = 87.045 kN/m
Minimum effective depth as per maximum bending moment is given by

50 106
( 0.36 35 0.48 103 ( 1 0.416 0.48 ) )
= 101.635 mm
As per table 14.2, clause 14.3.2.1 (page 142) of IRC112: 2011,
Clear cover =40+8=48 mm
So, d = 250 48 =202 mm > 101.63 mm (ok)
Using 16 mm- bars,cover for short span = 210 8 =202mm and cover for
long span =202 16=186 mm.
d =

3.6.6 REINFORCEMENT DETAILS FOR INTEROIR SLAB PANEL:


(i)Area of steel along short direction

0.5 35
4.6 50 106
1 1
10 3 202
3
2
415
35 10 202
As per clause -16.6.1.1 of IRC:112-2011
f ctm
btd
(Ast)min = 0.26
f yk
(Ast)B =

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
From table -6.5 (Page-38)of IRC :112-2011
Fctm=2.8 N/mm2
Fyk= 415 N/mm2
Bt=1000 mm
D = 202 mm
(Ast)min=354.351 mm2
Also same clause specified
(Ast)min=0.0013btd
= 262.6mm2
(Ast)max=0.025Ac
=0.025 250 1000=6250 mm2
Spacing of bars as per clause-16.6.1.1(4) of IRC-2011 is,
smax< 2h = 2 250 = 500 mm
In our case,spacing of 16 mm bars is
1000 /4 16 2
S
716.008
=280.811mm> 250 mm
Also as per clause-15.2.1 (2) of IRC:112-2011,
The clear distance between the parallel main reinforcing bars should not be less
than dg+10=20+10=30 mm and 20 mm , whichever is greater
Dg= aggregate size = assumed 20mm for slabs, providing 16 mm- bars @
225mm c/c
((Ast)B)provided =

1000 /4 16 2
225

=893.61 mm2
Also as per clause -12.2.2, page 120 of IRC:112-2011, under rare combination of
loads,the maximum tensile stress limits to 0.8 f y is to avoid inelastic strain,
undesirable cracking/deformation of structure and also to account for long term
creep.
We have calculated the steel area taking f yd=0.87fyk ( as per cl-15.2.3.3 IRC:1122011)
Considering the worst case i.e rare combination of loads, additional steel area
0.8
required =1
= 0.080 = 8% of required steel area.
0.87
So 8% of (Ast)required =

8
716.005 = 57.28 mm2
100

Ast to be provided=716.005+57.28=773.28
(Ast)Bprov. =893.61 mm2

mm 2<

893.61

mm2

(ok)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
(ii) Area of steel along long direction
Providing 12mm-
(Ast)L =

bars,

0.5 35
4.6 33 106
3
1 1
10 190
3
2
415
35 10 190

(Ast)min=0.26

f ctm
b f d
f yk

= 480.53 mm2

( cl-16.6.1,IRC:112-2011)

Fctm= 2.8 N/m2 (table-6.5 of IRC:112-2011)


(Ast)min =0.26

2.8
1000 190
415

=333.301 mm2

Also as per same clause ,


(Ast)min =0.0013btd=247 mm2
(Ast)max= 0.025Ac=0.025 250 1000

=6250 mm2

Spacing of bars as per clause-16.6.1.1(4 of IRC:112-2011 is,


Smax

2h=2 250=

1000 /4 12
S=
480.53

500 mm or 250mm ( smaller value is taken)


=235.36mm

Hence providing spacing of bars @175 mm c/c & using 12mm


((Ast)l)provided

1000 /4 122
=
175

bars

=646.30 mm2

Also as per clause-15.2.1(2) of IRC:112-2011, the clear distance between the


parallel main reinforcing bars should not be less than d g+10=20+10=30 mm or
20 mm (larger value is taken).
Also asper clause-12.2.2,P-120 of loads ,the max tensile stress in steel is limited
to 0.8fyk to avoid inelastic stain ,undesirable cracking/deformation of structure &
also to account for long term creep.
Hence more area required is = (1

0.8
)(Ast)required
0.87

=0.08 480.53=38.44 mm2

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
(Astl)required for creep cracking =480.53 + 38.44 =518.97 mm2< 646.30 mm2
(Ast)L.prov=646.30 mm2

For detailed reinforcement provision, please refer to Appendix B attached


with this thesis.

3.6.7 SHEAR CHECK IN INTERIOR DECK SLAB PANEL:


Vu87.045 KN/m = VEd.
0.33
Vrdc = [ 0.12 k ( 80 1 f ck ) + 0.15 cp ] bwd

VRdc =(Vmin+0.15 cp )bwd


K=1+

200
d

= 1+

(clause- 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011)

(minimum)

200
=1.894 < 2.0 (ok)
250

Vmin= 0.031K3/2fck1/2 =0.031 1.9953 /2 350.5


1=

=0.478 and

cp =0

A st
0.02
bw d

Asl =( Ast)B /2

=893.61/2=446.80 mm2

bw =1000, d = 202
1 = 2.21 10 3 =0.00221 < 0.02

(ok)

VRdc= [ 0.12 1.894 ( 80 0.00221 35 )0.33 ] 1000 250

=103.684 KN/m

(VRdc)min=119.50 KN/m
So minimum shear resistance isVRdc= 119.5 KN/m
No shear reinforcement is necessary in slabs.
3.6.8 DESIGN OF CANTILEVER SLAB:

VEd = 87.045 KN/m

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-13 (Cantilever portion of Slab)


3.6.8.1

Dead load Moment:

Hand rail (lump sum)=2 KN


Lever arm = 1.725m
Mla = 2 1.725

=3.45 kN-m

R.C.C post = 0.15 0.15 1 25

=0.562 kN

Lever arm = 1.725m


MRP= 0.97 KN-m
Kerb = 075 0.28 1 25

=5.25 kN

Lever arm=1.425 m
Mkerb=7.48 KN-m
R.C.C slab =0.3 1.8 25 =13.5 KN
Lever arm=0.9 m

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
MRS=12.15 KN-m
Wearing coat = 0.080 1.05 22 =1.85 KN
Lever arm=0.525m
Mwc=25.02 KN-m
Total dead load moment
Mdc=25.02 KN-m
3.6.8.2

Live load on Kerb:

L.L =400 kg/m2=4 KN/m2


Lateral load due to live load is =750 kg/m=7.5 KN/m
L.L=4 0.6=2.4 KN/m
Lateral L.L =7.5 KN/m
L.L moment =2.4 1.35= 3.24 KN-m
Lateral L.L moment=7.5 0.58 = 4.35 KN-m
3.6.8.3

(cl- 209 of IRC:6-2000)

Moment due to wheel load:

As per IRC-6:2010, only IRC-class A & IRC-class-B


Vehicles can come to the cantilever portion,since it can have a minimum distance
150 mm from kerb .

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Fig-14 (Wheel load on cantilever slab)
Using IRC-112:2011,
Annexure:B-3(2),Page-279,
effective depth (Bef)= 1.2a+b1
a=0.65 m
b1= 0.25+2 0.080

=0.41 m

Bef=1.2 0.65+ 0.41

=1.19 m

Live load per meter width including impact is


=(0.57 1.5 )/1.19=71.85 kN-m
Wheel load moment(Mwc)= 71.85 0.65
= 46.70 KN-m

drequired =

119 106
0.36 35 0.48 103 ( 1 0.416 0.48 )

=156.80 mm
Providing 40 mm clear cover &16 mm

bars,

Effective depth provided is


dprovided =400-(40+8)=352 mm

156.80

(ok)

3.6.9 REINFORCEMENT IN CANTILEVER SLAB:


Main reinforcement is given by
(Ast)main =

0.5 35
4.6 119 106
3
1 1
10 352
415
35 103 3522
=968.4056 mm2

Spacing of 16 mm-
S

=1000

16 2
4

bars is given by
=207.6 mm

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Providing 16 mm-

bars @ 190 mm c/c,

(Ast)main = 1058.22 mm2


Distribution moment is given by
Mdc = 1.5 [ 0.3 56.043+0.2 25.02 ]
=31.941 kN-m
Distribution reinforcement is
(Ast)dc = 349.2 mm2; Providing 12mm- bars @ 175 mm c/c
[(Ast)dc]provided =646.27 mm2

349.2 mm2

(ok)

Detailing of reinforcement is done in Appendix-B

3.6.10

CHECK FOR SHEAR IN CANTILEVER PORTION:

Total shear=dead load shear + liveload shear


= 23.162 + 1.5

5.7
+2.4=97.411
1.19

(where 1.19= bef (Annex-B3,IRC:112-2011))


Design shear = 1.5 97.41 = 146.115 kN=VEd
As per clause-10.3.2(2) of IRC:112-2011,
Shear resistance of a structure is given by
1/ 3
VRdc =[0.12k ( 80 1 f ck ) + ( 0.15 cp ) b w d

Subject to min VRdc=(Vmin+0.15 cp )bwd


K=1+

200
d

=1+

200
400

= 1.7

2.0

(ok)

Vmin=0.031k3/2fck1/2
=0.031 1.713 /2 351 /2

A sl
bw d

1058.22
1000 400

=0.41
= 2.645 10 3

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
1 /3

VRdc=[0.12 1.71 ( 80 2.645 103 35 )


(VRdc)min=0.41 1000 400
VRdc =164 kN

] 103 400

=158.93 kN

=164 kN

VEd =146.15 kN

(ok)

Also IRC:112-2011,cl-10.3.2(5) specified the following criteria.


Ved 0.5bwdvfcd
V=0.6[1

f ck
]
310

=0.6[1

35
]=0.532
310

So 0.5bwdvfcd= 0.5 1000 400 0.532 0.36 35


=1340.64 KN

VEd

(ok)

The live load applied is 0.65 m from the edge of support. The same clause
specifies that is the applied load is at av i.e 0.5d to 2d (200mm to 800mm ),then
there will be reduction factor multiplied to V ed.So in our case the dead load shear
will be as its i.e 23.162 KN
But live load shear will be (1.5

57
)
1.19

= reduction factor=av/2d

av= 650 mm

650
=0.8125
2 400

Vls=1.5

57
0.8125
1.19

=58.377KN
Total shear=84 kN
Ved=126 KN
VRdc=164 KN

126 kN

(ok)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

It may be noted that the downward wind force will be only 5 1.8=9 KN
against live load 86.22 KN. Hence, there is no need of combination of loads
taking wind effect in to account.

3.6.11
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR CANTILEVER SLAB:
The deflection will be checked as per is 456:2000.since we have different loading
at different positions,we have to consider them separate
3.6.11.1

First Trail (Annex-c of is 456:2000):

Short term deflection


b d 3 1000 2003
(Igr)end=
=
=6.67 108 mm 4
12
12
8
(Igr)mid = 22.5 10 mm4 , ( I gr ) at 0.65 m=29.35 10 8 m m 4
Fcr = 0.7 f ck=4.141 N /m m2
4.141 6.67 108
=27.6 kN m
100
8
4.141 22.5 10
(Mr)mid =
=62.115 kN m
150
(Mr)0.65m=74.158 kN-m
Ec = 5000 f ck =2.958 104 N /m m2
Es
5 N
, m=
=6.76
Es = 2 10
2
Ec
mm
Transformed area of compression steel =(m-1)Asc =3427.93mm2
Transformed area of tension steel=mAst = 7152.08 mm2
Let x be the depth of neutral axis
At end
x
Or 1000 x + 3427.93 ( x 46 )=7152.08 (152 x )
2
2
Or 500 x +10580.01 x 1459363.34=0
Or x=44.47mm
At mid, 500 x2 +10580.01 x 1960008.94=0
X=52.92mm
At 0.65m, 500 x2 +10580.01 x 2158693.7=0
X=55.97mm
(Mr)end=

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-15 (Area of Reinforcement in different section of cantilever slab)


1
1000 ( 44.47 )3 +3427.93 ( 44.47 46 )2 +7152.08 ( 152 44.47 )2
(Ir)end=
3
= 1.117 10 8 m m4
(Ir)mid = 3.1264 108 m m4
(Ir)at 0.65m = 5.58 108 mm4
z= lever arm iend=0.9d=136mm,zmid=226mm,zat 0.65m=251mm
(M)end=kerb+port&railing+l.due
to
pedestrian=7.48+3.45+0.97+4.35+3.24=19.49kn-m
(Mmid)=w.c+R.C slab=13.12kn-m
M0.65m=wheel laod=46.70kn-m

i
m
8
1.117 10
|
( r )end z end
x end b w

1
(Ieff)end= 1.2
=
27.6 136
44.47 = 3.67 108 m m4
d end b
1.2

1
( m )end d end
19.49 152
152
(|r )end

I
I
I
(|gr )end ( ok )
(|eff )end < (|r )end <
I

I
(|r )mid
(|eff )mid =

)( )

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

So

I
I
(|r )mid =3.1264 108 mm 4
(|eff )mid =

(Ieff )at 0.5 m= 88.84 10 8 m m4 > (Igr)at 0.65m


So (Ieff )at 0.65 m= 29.35 108 mm4
3

( 1

10212 ( 1800 )
w l3
=
=1.83 mm
)end=
3 E c I r 3 ( 2.958 104 ) ( 3.67 108 )

( 1 )mid =

15350 ( 1800 )3
8 ( 2.958 104 ) ( 3.1264 10 8 )

=1.21mm

1.15 w l 2 w l 3
+
=0.64 mm
Ec Ir
2
3
Total deflection due to short tern loading =3.68mm
Deflection due to shrinkage
acs=k3csl2
k3=0.5(for cantilever)
pt=0.7% ,pc=0.4%
pt p c
=0.26<1.0
k4=0.72
pt
0.25 pt pc =0.3<1.0 ( ok )
( 1 )At 0.65m =

(cs )end= 3.9 107


acs=0.63mm
Note-:here at other points,the cs will give much lesser value relating least
shrinkage deflection.
Deflection due to creep
Ec
Ece =
1+
=1.6(for 28-days strength)
Ece = 1.1377 104 N /m m2
m =Es/Ec = 17.58
Transformed area for compression steel (m-1)Asc = 9864.7 mm2
Transformed area for tension steel mAst = 18598.93 mm2
Let x-be the depth of neutral axis.
At End:
x
1000x
+ 9864.7(x-46) = 18598.93(152-x)
2
Or 500x2+28463.63x 3280813.56 = 0
Or x = 57.40 mm

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
At mid:
500x2 + 28463.63x 5140706.56 = 0
Or x = 76.853mm
At 0.65 m:
500x2 + 28463.63x 5657384.835 = 0
Or x = 81.65 mm
Same lever arm as used before will be used.
So
Similarly Ir.mid = 7.3108 mm4 and Ir at 0.65m = 9.22108 mm4

= 2.30108 mm4

So
Ir.end< Ieff.end< Igr.end (OK)
Similarly (Ieff)mid= 4.17 108 mm4 < (Ir)mid
(Ieff)mid = 7.3 108 mm4
(Ieff)at 0.65m = 29.35 108 mm4
But in this case ,for calculating perm. Creep using above equations & E ce,only
permanent load will be taken care of .no live load will be there
So (W)end=kerb +R.C pol&railing=5.25+2.562=7.812 kN/m
(W)mid =W.C+R.C slab=1.85+13.5=15.35 kn/m
( W end ) l 3 ( W mid ) l3
(ai.cc)perm=
+
3 E ce I eff 8 E ce I eff
=(2.39+1.35)mm=3.74mm
Short term deflection due to permanent load
7 . 81210 3 1800 3
15. 35 103 18003
+
ai.perm =
4
8
4
8 =1.4+1.21=2.61mm
3 2. 958 10 3 .67 10 8 2 . 958 10 3 .1264 10
So deflection due to creep is given by
3.74-2.61=1.13mm
Total deflection is =3.68+0.63+1.13
=5.44mm
However this deflection will be lesser in practical as more accurate calculations
will reveal the result
As per clause 12.4.1 of IRC:112-2011,the deflection should be limited to =
cantilever span
375

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
1800
=4.8 mm<5.44 mm
375
Now lets check it as per cl-23.2 of is:456-2000
fs=220.27, pt=0.7%
Modification factor=1.2(fig-4,p-38)
pc=0.4%
Modification factor=1.12
span
=7 ( for cantilever )
Basic
depth
span
Modified
=71.121.2=9.408
depth
span
Our
= 6<9.408(ok)
depth
=

But revising the section as providing 16 bars 225mm c/c & 12mm
bars@225mm alternatively&rechecking,the defection criteria is satisfied. Hence
total reinforcement provided is given by 1396 mm2.
3.6.11.2
Second Trail- Rechecking of deflection for Cantilever
Slab(Annex c of IS-456:2000):
Short term deflection
b d 3 1000 2003
(Igr)end=
=
=6.67 108 mm 4
12
12
8
(Igr)mid = 22.5 10 mm4 , ( I gr ) .65m=29.35 108 mm 4
Fcr = 0.7 f ck=4.141 n /m m2
4.141 6.67 108
=27.6 kN m
100
8
4.141 22.5 10
(Mr)mid =
=62.115 kN m
150
(Mr)0.65m=74.158 kn-m
(Mr)end=

Ec = 5000 f ck =2.958 104 N /m m2


Es
5 n
, m=
=6.76
Es = 2 10
2
Ec
mm
Transformed area of compression steel =(m-1)Asc =3720.96mm2
Transformed area of tension steel=mAst = 9436.96 m m2
Let x be the depth of neutral axis
At end
x
= 1000 x + 3720.96 ( x 46 )=9436.96 ( 152 x )
2
2
= 500 x +13157.92 x 1605582.08=0

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
=x=45.02mm
At mid
= 500 x2 +13157.92 x 2549278.08=0
X=59.45mm
At 0.65m
= 500 x2 +13157.92 x 2811436.83=0
X=62.97mm
1
3
2
2
1000 ( 45.02 ) +3720.96 ( 45.02 46 ) + 9436.96 ( 152 45.02 )
(Ir)end=
3
= 1.38 108 mm4
(Ir)mid = 4.2 108 m m4
(Ir)at 0.65m = 5.27 108 m m4
z= lever arm. zend=0.9d=136mm,zmid=226mm,zat 0.65m=251mm
(M)end=kerb+port&railing+l.due
pedestrian=7.48+3.45+0.97+4.35+3.24=19.49KN-m
(Mmid)=w.c+R.C slab=13.12KN-m
M0.65m=wheel laod=46.70KN-m

i
m
(|r )end z end
x

1 end = 4.5 10 8 m m4
(Ieff)end= 1.2
d end
( m )end d end
(|r )end

I
I
I
(|gr )end ( ok )
(|eff )end < (|r )end <
I

I
(|r )mid =4.2 108 mm4
(|eff )mid =

(Ieff )at 0.65 m= 54.44 108 m m4 < (Igr)at 0.65m= 29.35 108 mm4
w l3
=1.5 mm , ( 1 )mid
( 1 )end=
= 0.9 mm ,
( 1 )At
3 Ec I r

1.15 w l 2 w l 3
+
=0.64 mm
Ec I r
2
3
1

to

0.65m

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Total deflection due to short tern loading =3.04mm
Deflection due to shrinkage
acs=k3csl2
k3=0.5(for cantilever)
pt=0.92% ,pc=0.425%
k4 0.37<1.0
0.25 pt pc =0.495<1.0 ( ok )
(cs )end= 5.55 107
acs=0.9mm
Deflection due to creep-:
Ec
Ece =
1+
=1.6(for 28-days strength)
Es
4 N
=17.58
Ece = 1.1377 10
,m=
2
E ce
mm
Transformed area of compression steel =(m-1)Asc =10710.68mm2
Transformed area of tension steel=mAst = 24541.68 mm2
Depth of neutral axis at different section
At end
at mid
at 0.65m
X=63.2mm
x=85.566mm
x=91.08mm
8
4
8
4
(Ir)end= 2.80 10 mm , (Ir)mid= 9.03 10 m m
(Ir)0.65m= 2.80 108 mm4
(Ieff)mid= 5.63 108 m m4 < (Ir)mid
(Ieff)end = 6.08 108 mm4
(Ieff)at 0.65m = 47.80 10 8 m m4 ; which should not be greater than Igr at 0.65m
(W)end=7.812 kN/m,
(W)mid =15.35 kN/m
3
( W end ) l ( W mid ) l3
(ai.cc)perm=
+
3 E ce I eff 8 E ce I eff
=(2.2+1.1)mm=3.3mm
Short term deflection due to permanent load
7.812 103 18003
15.35 103 18003
+
ai.perm =
=1.4+1.21=2.61mm
3 2.958 104 3.67 108 8 2.958 10 4 3.1264 10 8
Deflection due to creep = 0.69mm 0.70mm
Hence total deflection = 3.04 + 0.9+0.7 = 4.64 mm < 4.8 mm (ok)
3.6.12

ANCHORAGE LENGTH OF BARS:

3.6.12.1

Intermediate Deck Slab Panel:

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
(i)

In short direction:

main bars = 16 mm @ 225 mm c/c


(lb.net)B= a l b
A st req
a

(page no-152, cl-15.2.4.3, of IRC:112-2011)

A st provided
716.005
893.61

A st provided

A st req

=0.865

=1 (for straight bars)

lb =k
=

0.87 f y
4 f bd

16 0.87 415
4 30
2011)

( f bd=3.0 N/mm2 table-15.3 of page -150,IRC:112-

=481.4 mm
Also k=30

[ for M35 concrete of table-15.4 of IRC:112-2011]

lb = 30 16

= 480 mm

lets take lb=480mm


(lb.net)B =1 480 0.865
=415.0 mm

420 mm

lb.min =0.3lb =144 mm

(for tension anchorage)

lb.min =0.6lb=288 mm

( for compression anchorage)

lb.min=10 =160 mm or 100 mm


lb.net

lb.min

(ii)
A st . req
A st . provided
a

=1

(ok)

In long direction:
=

480.53
=0.743
646.30

0.75
(for straight bars)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
lb =k
=30 12 =360mm

12 0.87 415
4

or lb=

= 361.05 mm

So lb = 360 mm
lb.net =1 360 0.75

= 270 mm

lb.min =0.3lb=108 mm

(tension anchor)

=0.6 lb=216 mm
lb.min =10
lb.net

=120 mm or 100 mm

lb.min

3.6.12.2
A st . req
A st . provided
a

(compression anchor)

Cantilever slab:
=

872.56
1058.22

=0.824

(cl-15.2.4.3 of IRC:112-2011)

=1

lb=k

=30 12=360 mm

lb.net =0.824 360=296.64


300 mm
3.6.13
CANTILEVER SLAB STIFFENING:
As per clause -16.6.1.4-(1)(a)&(b) of IRC:112-2011,the unsupported edge of a slab
parallel to traffic &beyond the clear road width &having varying depth shall be
stiffened at any particular point to the resisting moment of 500mm adjacent strip
at that particular point.
93.61
=446.805 mm2
[(Ast B)0.5m strip]in main slab between girder =
2
1396.26
2
2
=698.132m m > 446.805 mm ( ok )
[(Ast B)0.5m strip]in cantilever section =
2
646.27
=323.135 mm2
[(Ast l)0.5m strip]in main slab between girder =
2
646.27
2
=323.135 mm
[(Ast L)0.5m strip]cantilever slab between girder =
2
3.6.14

DESIGN OF LONGITUDINAL GIRDER:

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Effective span=18.33 m
rid width=400mm
slab thickness=250 mm
Main beam spacing=2.5 m
Depth of rib = 1400 mm
Total depth =1400+250+150=1800mm=D
(a)

REACTION FACTOR:

Courbons method can be applied to our design since span to depth ratio is
greater than 2. Arrangement of class-AA tracked load for maximum eccentricity is
as given below.

Fig-16 (Arrangement of class-AA tracked load for maximum eccentricity)


As per Courbons formula ,
Rx=

w
n

[1

+ I

d x2

dxe]

Rx=Reaction factor
It may be noted that RA=Rc since the same loading can be reversed in two cases.
RA=

2 W1
3I
2.5 1.1 ]
[1+
2
3
2 2.5 I

n= no of girders =3
dx=spacing of girders=2.5 m
W1=350 KN

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
w
3 1.1
[1+
]
3
2 2.5

RA=Rc=

( W=700 kN = total axle load )

RB = 2W1/3[1+0]
= 2W1/3 =0.33W
(b)

DEAD LOAD:

From cantilever slab:


Weight of parapet railing=2 kN/m
Wearing coat=0.080 1.05

22=1.848 kN/m

Cantilever slab=0.3 1.8 25 = 13.5 kN/m


Kerb=0.28 0.75 25

= 5.25 kN/m

Parapet = 0.40 kN/m


Total dead load from cantilever slab =23kN/m
Total deck slab load =2 23+8.46 5.4 =91.684 kN/m
Live load due to pedestrian=4

2=8 kN/m

It is assumed that all loads are equally distributed to 3 girders


So deck slab dead load/girder=99.684/3 =33.228 kN/m
T-beam rib dead load:
0.4 1.4 25

= 15.50 kN/m

Total weight per girder = (33.23+15.5)=48.78 49 kN/m

Cross girder:
Dead weight of one cross girder is=0.3 1.4 25 =10.50 kN/m
This load expands up to 2.5 m both sides on intermediate girder
Hence reaction from cross girder = 10.50 2.5=26.25 kN

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
The end cross beams will not be considered since their loads will be directly
transferred to support through piers. Hence end reactions need not be considered.
The presentation is as follows

Fig-17 (Reaction from Cross Girder on Longitudinal Girders)

Maximum dead load bending moment at center of span is,


(Mmax)dead load =

49 18.332 26.25 18.33 26.25 18.33


+
+
8
4
4

=2300 kN-m

Total dead load shear at support is


(Vdead)s=
(c)

49 18.33 26.25 2 26.25


+
+
=488.46
2
2
2

489kN

LIVE LOAD BENDING MOMENT IN GIRDER:

Span =18.33 m, Impact =10%; for maximum bending moment to occur, the
live load is placed centrally on the span as shown below.

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-18 (Position of Class-AA tracked Load for maximum bending moment)


1
Live load bending moment is given by
( 3.6825+4.5825 )_ 700=2892.75 KN -m
2
2893 kN m
Bending
moment
with
impact
&
reaction
factor
(Ml)outer girder=0.553 1.10 2893=1759.812 KN m 1760 kN m
(Ml)inner girder=0.333 1.10 2893=1059.711060 kN m

(d)

is

given

by

LIVE LOAD SHEAR:

For shear force to be maximum,the loading should be arranged as shown below.

Fig-19 (Live load arrangement for maximum shear force )

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Wheel load placed at starting will be giving maximum shear i.e. starting point of
either end; either A or B . Again one wheel has to be placed on one girder to
give severe effect as the distribution load will occur only for one wheel load.
Reaction of w2 on girder-B is given by 350

0.45
=63 kN
2.5

Reaction of W2 on girder-A is given by 350

2.05
2.50

=287 kN

Total load on girder B =350+63 = 413 KN


Maximum reaction on support of girder B is =

413 16.53
18.33

= 372.44 kN

Maximum live load shear including impact =1.1 372.44=409.68 410 kN

TABLE-4(Design Bending Moment and Shear force on Girders)

Bending
D.L
Moment/Gir Bending
der
Moment

L.L
Bending
Moment

Total
Bending
Moment

Unit

Outer Girder

2300

1760

4060

kN-m

Inner Girder

2300

1060

3360

kN-m

Shear
Force/Girde
r

D.L
Shear

L.L Shear

Total Shear

Unit

Outer Girder

489

410

899

kN

Inner Girder

489

410

899

kN

(e)
CALCULATION OF BENDING MOMENT USING HENDRY-JAEGAR METHOD:

A =(

12
4

nE I r
EI
)
)
L 3
h

()

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

2
CJ
h

F=
)(
)(
)
E Ir
L
2n

c=

E I1
E I2

=1

L= span of bridge deck = 18.33 m


h = spacing of longitudinal girders = 2.5 m
n = number of cross girders = 5
EI = flexural rigidity of longitudinal girder
CJ = torsional rigidity of longitudinal girder
E I 1 & E I 2 = flexural rigidities of the outer & inner longitudinal girders
E Ir

= flexural rigidity of one cross beam .

Fig-20 (Simplified T-beam Longitudinalgirder section)


As per clause 7.6.1.2 of IRC :112-2011 , the effective flange width will be
calculated.
Beff. 1 = 0.2 b 1+ 0.1l 0
=0.2 1.05+0.1 18.33=2.043 m
0.2l0=3.66m > 2.043 m
Bw=0.4 m
Beff=2 2.043+0.4

(ok)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
=4.486 m
B= 2.5 m< 4.488 m
beff=2.5m

Fig-21 (Simplified T-beam Cross girder section)


beff.1=0.2b1+0.1l0
=0.2 2.1037+ 0.1 0.7 2.5
0.2l0 =0.2 0.7 2.5=0.35> 0.596 m
beff.1=0.35 m
beff=2 0.35+ 0.3=1 m
b =4.5075 m>1m

(ok)

Longitudinal girder:
A 1+ A
A x +A x
x = 1 1 2 2

2.5 0.25 0.125+1.55 0.4 1.025


2.5 0.25+1.55 0.4

=0.57 m

3
2.5 0.253 (
2 0.4 1.55
)
(
)
I L=
+ 2.5 0.25 0.448 +
+ ( 0.4 1.35 ) 0.4522=0.3795 m4
12
12

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Cross girder:
x =

A 1 X 1+ A 2 X 2
A 1+ A 2
1 0.25 0.125+0.3 1.55 1.025
1 0.25+0.3 1.55

=0.710 m

3
1 0.253
2 0.3 1.55
Ir =
+1 0.25 0.585 +
+0.3 1.55 0.3152
12
12

0.2261 m

A=

18.33
2.5
5 E 0.2261
=144.64
)3
12
E
0.3795

J = R a3 b
b 2500
=
=10
a 250
R=0.312
Bridges )

( Table-7.3 of N. Krishna Raju ,Design of

b 1550
=
=3.875
a 400
R=0.2787
J = Ra3 b = 0.312 0.253 2.5+ 0.2787 0.4 3 1.55
F=

= 0.0398

2
2.5
0.43 E 0.0398

=0.0102 0
2 5 18.33
E 0.2261

Two extreme values of F can be taken into analysis i.e. F = 0 or F =

M
Taking F = 0 for analysis , (| M )
0

(F A)
( 3+ F A )

M F =M O +

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

O
; M O=0.83 ( For outer girder , F=0 )
M

MF

M O=

0.36 (For inner girder, F = 0)

Design moment for exterior girder :


Dead load moment = 2300 kN-m
Live load moment

= 2893 1.1 0.83

Total moment = 4941.00 kN-m

= 2641.31 kN-m

4060 k N-m as calculated using Courbons method

Interior girder:
Dead load moment = 2300 kN-m
Live load moment = 2893 1.1 0.36
Total moment = 3445.63 kN-m
s method

=1145.63 kN-m

3446 kN m>3360 kN m as calculated by Courbon

(f) MODIFIED COURBONS METHOD:


Ref : International Journal of scientific & Engineering research Volume 4 , Issue
3 ,March 2013 (ISSN 2229 -5518)
Study of Effectiveness of Courbon s Theory in the Analysis of T beam bridges

By: M.G. Kalyan & hetti &R. P. Shriram


As per journal, they have studied the 4-lane & 6-lane bridge of spans varying
15m-35 for minimum 3-longitudinal girders varying number of girders. They have
combined Courbons method &grillage method (STAAD pro) to get the results.
As per journal,
Pi =

correction factor

Or
=
We have calculated
Ra = Rc=ROuter girder =0.553w

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Rb=Rinner girder=0.333w
Correction factor is given by,
Y= correction factor,x= span of bridge
X=18.33m

y=0 . 000134

= 0.9214 (rounded up to 4 decimal)


RA=RC= (Router girder) corrected=0.5530.9214=0.5095
RB=(R inner girder) corrected=0.3330.9214=0.3068
Total bending moment
Outer girder=2300+28931.100.5095=3921.40 KN-m
Inner girder=2300+28931.100.3068=3276.33 KN-m
Out of all 3-analysis, Hendry-Jaegar method gives the highest moment
Design momentOuter longitudinal girder=1.54771.31=7411.50=7412 KN-m
Intermediate girder=1.53276=5169 kN-m
Design shear
Shear force =8711.5=1348.50 kN
(g)

DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT OF OUTER GIRDER:

Lets assume 32mm bars as main reinforcement bars in 4 rows, the clear
spacing between bars is 32mm &hence c/c distance is 64mm
Lets take clear cover =40mm( clause-14.3.2,table-14.2,severe condition)
Assuming 10mm dia stirrups& surface reinforcement(as cl-16.5.4)
Effective cover=40+10+12+30+10+15+120=235mm
Hence effective depth= 1800-235=1565mm
Lets take d=1560mm
Df= 250mm
Df /d=0.1602 <0.2
Bf = 2.5m (as calculated earlier)
Xumax =0.481600=768mm
Lets check the actual neutral axis depth
Lets take xu =Df =250mm
250
250
1-0 . 416
Mu =0.36 35 2500 (1600)2
1600
1600
=11781kN-m
Imposed moment calculated =7412 kN-m=Ma
Mu >>Ma (hence neutral axis lies inside flange section)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

0. 5 35
4 .6 7412106
[1 1
]2500 1560
415
35 2500 15602
=13740.20 mm2
providing 30mm dia bars as main reinforcing bars,
(Ast)required =

Total bars required =


Lets provide 20 numbers of 30mm- bars at 5 rows each containing 4 bars
So (Ast)provided=
The spacing between longitudinal bars is
As per IS 456:2000, clause-26.3.2, the spacing should be minimum of following
Diameter of bars =30mm
5mm more than nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate =20+5=25mm
Our spacing is 35.33 is satisfactory.
For detailing of reinforcement, please refer to Appendix-Battached with this
thesis.
(h)
DESIGN REINFORCEMENT FOR INNER GIRDER:
d = 1600 mm, Df = 250mm and bf = 2.5m
Assuming neutral axis to be within the flanges, Mu = 1178 kN-m
Applied moment = Mu applied = 5169 kN-m << Mu

So Ast.req =
= 9453.60 mm2
Providing 16- 28 mm bars in 4- rows, (Ast)provided = 9852.03 mm2
For detailing of reinforcement, please refer to Appendix-B attached with this
thesis.
(i) CALCULATION OF ANCHORAGE LENGTH:
Clause -15.2.4.3 of IRC:112-2011
Outer girder
a
a
(|s ) provided l bmin
Lb.net=
(|s ) reqd

a lb

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Lets assume

So
lb=

a =1
f yd

4
f bd

A
A
(|st ) provided =1 at a section
(|st ) reqd

()( )

30 0.87 415

=902.625 903 mm
4
3
Or lb=k=3030=900mm
lb.net =lb=903mm
lb.min=0.3lb=288.9mm or 100mm or 10=300mm
Inner girder
28 0.87 415

=842.45 843 mm
lb=
4
3
lb.net =843mm
2
Length of bearing =
l
(16.5.1.4. of IRC :112-2011)
3 b.net
=602mm(outer girder)
=562mm(inner girder)
=

(j) BAR CURTAILMENT:


As we know when the load is divided in the same ratio as the span is divided at a
point where B.Moment to be calculated, maximum B.M is obtained. In ILD. Lets
consider following cases.

(i) Load at quarter span/ at 4.5825 m from ends of girder

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Fig-22.1 (Bar curtailment-Wheel load at quarter span)
The load arrangement is as shown in the figure taking ILD into consideration.
Wheel load moment:
1
[ 3.44 +2.764 ] 700=2171.40 kN m
=
2
Dead load moment:
= 488.46 4.5825 49 4.58252 0.5=1724 kN m
As per H-J method, wheel load BM including impact & coefficient
=
Total design moment on outer girder= 1.5 (1982.5+ 1724=5560 kN m )
Total design moment on inner girder= 1.5 (1724 +1.1 2171.40 0.36 ) =3876 kN-m
(ii) Loads at a distance 6.874m from ends of girder

Fig-22.2 (Bar curtailment-Wheel load at 6.874m from end of girder)


Wheel load moment= 700 [ 3.45+4.3 ] 0.5=2712.5 kN m
Deadload moment= 488.46 6.874 [ 49 0.5 6.8742 +26.25 2.2165 ]
=2142kN-m
Total design b.m on outer girder due to impact and H.J coefficient =
2712.5 1.1 0.83+2142=6928 kN m
1.5
Total design b.m on inner girders due to impact and H.J coefficient=
2712.5 1.1 0.36+2142=4825 kN m
1.5
(iii)Load at a distance 2.29125 m from ends of girder

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-22.3 (Bar curtailment-Wheel load at 2.29125m from girder end)


Wheel load moment= 700 [ 1.6112+2.005 ] 0.5 =1266kN-m
Dead load moment= 488.46 2.29125 49 0.5 (2.29125 )=991 kN m
Total design moment on outer girder= 1.5 ( 991+ 1.1 0.83 1266 )=3220.30 kN m
Total design moment on inner girder= 1.5 ( 991+ 1.1 0.36 1266 ) =2238.50 kN m
(k) REQUIRED STEEL AREA AS PER BAR CURTAILMENT:
(1)Load at quarter span/ at 4.5825 m from ends of girder
Outer girder:
Providing 16-30mm bars ,(Ast.reqd)O.G=
Note-:4-bars are curtailed beyond the section providing development l b.net
extension i.e at 3.6795m from ends of girders.
Inner girder:

A
st
. req
=

Providing 12-28mmdia bars ,


Note-:4-bars are curtailed beyond the section providing development l b.net
extension i.e at 3.7395m from ends of girders
(2)Loads at a distance 6.874m from ends of girder
Outer girder :

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

A
Providing 19-30mm dia bars , = st . prov

Note-:1-bars are curtailed at a distance of 5.971m from ends of support


Inner girder:

A st . req

A
Providing 15-28mm dia bars= st . prov

Note-:1-bars are curtailed at a distance of 6.031m from ends of support


(3) Load at a distance 2.29125 m from ends of girder
Outer girder:

A st . reqd

A
Providing 10-30mm dia bars,= st . prov

Note -:10-30mm dia bars are curtailed from 1.388m from ends of support
Inner girder:

A st . req Providing 8mm bars , A st . prov

Note -:8-28mm bars are curtailed from 1.44825m from ends of girder

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

(OUTER GIRDER)

(INNER GIRDER)
Fig-23 (Bar curtailment Presentation for Longitudinal Girders)
(l) CALCULATION OF INDUCED SHEAR AT DIFFERENT SECTIONS:
(i)
Wheel load at starting

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-24.1 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at starting)

Applying impact, total shear =454.3kN


Again reaction at support is =
Dead load shear =
Total shear=899kN 900 kN
(ii) Shear at 9.165 from end of girder

Fig-24.2 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at middle)

Track shear force at middle is =


Dead load shear=
Total shear=196.205200kN
(iii) Shear at 4.5825 from end of girder

Fig-24.3 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at quarter span)

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
1
[ 0.75+ 0.5536 ] 413 1.1=296.113 kN
2
Dead load shear= 489 ( 49 4.5825 )=264.46 kN
Total shear=561kN
(iv) Shear at 1.95m from end of girder
Track s.f at 4.5825m=

Fig-24.4 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at 1.95 m from end)


L.L shear=361.441kN
D.l shear = 489 ( 49 1.95 )=393.45 kN
Total shear=755kN

(v)

Shear at 3.0m from end of girder

Fig-24.5 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at 3.0 m from end)


L.L shear=335.34kN
D.L shear=489-(493)=342kN
Total shear=678kN
(vi)
Shear at 6.87375m from end of girder

Fig-24.6 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at 6.87375m from end)


L.L shear=239.325kN
D.L shear= 489 ( 49 6.87375+26.25 ) =126 kN

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Total shear=366 kN
(vii) Shear at 4.3825 m from end of girder

Fig-24.7 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at 4.3825 m from end)


Track shear at 4.3825 m = 0.5 [0.761+0.564]1.10413 = 301 kN
Dead load shear = 489 (494.3825) = 275 kN
Total shear force = 576 kN
(viii) Assuming bearing =450mm & fan like compression field at an angle 45,total
depth up to which shear reinforcement is not necessary is given by,
450+1560=2010=2.01m
Hence shear at 2.01m from end of girder is

Fig-24.8 (Shear force calculation-Wheel load at 2.01m from end)


L.l shear= 413 1.1 0.5 ( 0.8903+ 0.694 )=360 kN
D.d shear= 489 ( 49 2.01 )=390.51 kN
Total shear=750.51KN 751 kN
(m)
SHEAR RESISTANCE CHECK:
Lets provide 1bent up bar at 4.5825m & at 645mm interval up to 2.00m
shown below
Maximum spacing of bent up bars

(
)
s bmax =0.6 d 1+cot clause 16.5 .2 ( 8 ) of IRC :112 2011 ]

0.6
1560
2=1.872>
0.645
( ok )
=
Now

A sw =1

302 =706 mm2 ( outer girder )


4

282=615 m m2 ( inner girder )


4
As per clause 10.3.3.3 of IRC:112-2011,
& 1

as

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Now

v rds =

asw
z f ywd ( cot+ cot ) sin
s

s=0.645m
z=0.9d=0.91560=1440mm
f ywd =0.8415=332 N /mm2
706
1
( V Rds)O . G = 645 1404 332 2 =721.55 kN
2
V Rd . m ax = cw bw v 1 f cd z ( cot +cot ) / ( 1+cot 2 )
=14000.915600.60.36352/2
=4245.696>>721.55 KN (ok)
615
1
( V Rds ) I .G = 645 1404 332 2
2
=628.543<< 4245.696 kN (ok)
Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement is given by
VRdc = [ 0.12 k ( 80 1 f ck )

0.33

+ 0.15 cp ] bw d ( cl 10.3.2 of IRC : 112 2011 )

cp =0
3

vmin= 0.031 k 2 f 2
ck

200
200
=1+
=1.358<2 ( ok )
d
1560
vmin=0.29
(VRdc)min= ( v min +0.15 cp ) bw d
K= 1+

=0.294001560=181.105 kN
A st
Now 1=
bw d
Since half reinforcement is always available throughout,
0.5 14137.167
=0.01133< 0.02
( 1 )O.G=
400 1560
0.5 9852.03
=7.89 10 3< 0.02
( 1 )I.G =
400 1560
(VRdc)O.G = [ 0.12 1.358 ( 80 0.01133 35 )0.33 ] 400 1560
318 kN > v Rdc. min ( ok )
(VRdc)I.G= [ 0.12 1.358 ( 80 7.89 10 3 35 )
= 282 kN > v Rdc . min ( ok )
(n)

0.33

] 400 1560

SHEAR REINFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION ON OUTER GIRDER:

Total shear at face of support= 900kN

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
However as its simply supported & a bearing of 450mm is provided,a fan like
compression field will exist having steepest angle =45 up to which no shear
reinforcement will be necessary. so the effective section for shear will be at
0.45+1.560=2.01m from end of girder
Total shear at 2.01m=751kN
Design shear=1.5751=1126.50 kN
Shear resisted by girder without shear reinforcement = (VRdc)O.G=318 kN
Hence design shear for which shear reinforcement will be provided=V Ed
=(1126.50-318)KN=808.50 kN
The shear resisting capacity of available bent up bars at that section is 721.55 kN
But as per clause -10.3.3.3(2)& clause-16.5.2(3)
of IRC :112-2011,only 50% of the shear will be resisted by the bent up bars
Hence shear to be resisted by links/stirrups
808.50
=404.25 kn
By
2
0.5 10 0.6 0.36 35 400 645
=4154.21 mm2 >706 mm 2 ( ok )
1
[check:(asw.max)bent up bars=
0.8 415
2
>615mm2(ok)
Lets provide 4-legged 8mm vertical stirrups

2
2
2
Asw = 4 8 =201.062m m =201m m
4
Using clause-10.3.3.2 of IRC:112-2011,
f cd
Vrd.max= cw bw v 1 f cd z
( cot+tan )
0.36 35
= 1 400 0.9 1560 0.6
2
=2122.848kN>>404.25 kN (ok)
As per same clause ,spacing of vertical stirrups given by
asw f ywd z cot
S=
v rds
201 0.9 1560 0.8 415 1
=231.766 mm
=
404.25 103
Let;s provide 4-legged 8mm vertical stirrups@ 200mm c/c starting/end of
girders.
As per cl-16.5.2 of irc:112-2011,
Min. Shear reinforcement ratio is
0.072 f ck 0.072 35
=
=1.026 103
w.min=
f yk
415

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Provided shear reinforcement ratio is
A sw
201
=
=2.125 10 3> ( w.min)(ok)
( w)=
s bw sin 200 400
Shear force at 4.5825m from ends of girder 561kN. Here no bent up bars are
available
Design shear=841.5kN

2
2
(Asl)o.g= 18 30 =12723.45 m m
4

8620.53
=0.0138 0.02
1 )o.g=0.02039 > 0.02, 1 )i.g=
400
1560

(vrdc)o.g = 0.12 1.358 ( 80 0.02 35 )0.33 400 1560=383.855 383 kN


(vrdc)i.g = 0.12 1.358 ( 80 0.0138 35 )0.33 400 1560=339.615 339 kN
Shear to be resisted by stirrups is
(841.5-383) kN =458.5 kN
VRd.max=2122.848>458.50 kN(ok)
Spacing of stirrups is
201 0.9 1560 0.8 415 1
=204.344 mm
S=
458.50 103
Lets provide 4-legged 8mm vertical stirrups@190mm c/c up to 6.87375m from
girder end on both sides. Shear force at 6.87375m from end of girder is 366kN
factored shear=549kN
Shear resistance=383 kN
Total shear to be resisted by stirrups is 549-383=166 kN
Spacing of same 4-legged 8mm vertical stirrups is given by
201 0.9 1560 0.8 415 1
=564.408 mm
s=
3
166 10
As per cl-16.5.2(7) of IRC:112-2011,
Slmax =0.75d(1+cot)=0.7515601=1170mm>564.408mm(ok)
But As per cl-16.5.3(3,4) of IRC:112-2011, specifies for torsion criteria to be
satisfied,the minimum spacing should be 350mm or
1
1
3200=400 m }( lesser of two )
[outer perimeter of the member]=
8
8
So provide 4-legged -8mm vertical stirrups @360mm c/c in the middle strip
band of length 4.5825m
Again it should satisfy ( w)min
( w)min = 1.026 10 3
201
=1.436 10 3 > ( w ) min ( ok )
( w)prov =
350 400
(o)
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION ON INNER GIRDER:

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
0.45+1.56=2.01m from girder end
Total design shear=1126.50kN
(VRdc)I.G=282 kN
Design shear for which shear reinforcement will be provided=844.50kn
Bent up bars shear resistance is
(VRds)I.G =628.543 kN
844.50
=422.25 kN
But it will be taking only
2
Rest 422.25kn will be taken care of by the vertical stirrups.
Providing 8mm -4 legged stirrups,
Asw=201 mm2
Cl-10.3.3.2 of IRC:112-2011 specifies
Vrd.max=2122.848kN >> 422.25kN(ok)
Following same clause, spacing of stirrups,
201 0.9 1560 0.8 415 1
=221.88mm
S=
422.25 103
Provide 8mm-4legged stirrups @200mmc/c up to 4.3825m from end of girder on
both sides ( w)min = 1.026 10 3
(

w prov

201
=2.5125 10 3 > ( w ) min ( ok )
200 400

Shear at 4.3825m is given by 576 kN.


Design shear=1.5576=864kN
No bent up bars are available here.
(VRdc)I.G=339 kN
Shear to be resisted by stirrups=525kN
VR d.max=2122.84kN >>525kN
Spacing of stirrups is given by
201 0.9 1560 0.8 415 1
=178.46 mm
S=
302.50 10 3
Provide 8mm-4legged stirrups @160mmc/c up to 6.87375m
Shear at 6.87375m from end of girder is; Design shear=1.5360=549kN

2
2
(Ast)available= 16 28 =9852.035 mm
4

9852.035
=0.016< 0.02
1 )I.G=
400 1560

(VRdc)I.G=356.604 kN
Shear to b resisted by links and/stirrups

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
(549-356.604)kn=192.396kn 193 kN
Providing minimum shear reinforcement spacing of 350mm c/c,
201 0.9 1560 0.8 415 1
=267.691kN > 193 kn ( ok )
VRds=
350
So Provide 8mm-4legged stirrups @350mmc/c in middle strip-band of length
4.5825m
( w)min = 1.026 10 3
(

w prov

(p)

201
=1.436 10 3 > ( w ) min ( ok )
350 400 1
SURFACE REINFORCEMENT:

Fig-25 (Surface Reinforcement provision)


Surface reinforcement will be provided taking a surface area of the cover portion
outside of the stirrups.
Surface area on one face of girder=871400=121800mm 2
0.01 Act.ext =1218mm2
We have side face reinforcement of approximately 5-12mm dia bars which provide
565.5mm2
Providing 10mm bars @150mmc/c,total steel area provided per unit run is
=
Total reinforcement=1274.976>1218mm2(OK)
Surface area on lower end i.e at foot of girder=92400=36800
=0.01 Act.ext=368mm2
Provision of 4-16mm bars will be giving

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

=
Also stirrups will be giving
=
Total area provided=976.25mm2>368mm2(ok)
All the surface reinforcement bars are perfectly anchored&hence will be
serving as shear reinforcement also appear same clause(5) also
Also side face longitudinal bars will be serving as side face reinforcement for
stability as per clause-26.5.1.3 of IS-456:2000
(q)
CHECK
FOR
BAR
CURTAILMENT
ADEQUACY
AS
PER
CURTAILMENT OF GIRDER BARS:
The check will be done as per clause 16.5.1.3 off IRC:-112-2011(page -176)&
clause-16.5.1.4 off IRC:112-2011(page -177)
Before checking,it may be noted that the longitudinal bar curtailment rule as per
figure-16.2 of IRC:112-2011(page -177) will be taken care of for end sections only
since at end of girders,there is maximum shear &minimum reinforcement is acting
upon all other sections will be found safer if automatically if end section are found
safer
Frs=tensile capacity of reinforcement

n=numbers of bars at ends, d=diameter of bars

=2552.112kN

2
(Frs)I.G= 8 28 0.87 415=2778.54 kN
4
The above Frs should be greater that Fs+

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Effective shear will occur at 2.01m from end &its value is 1126.50kN
Fs=0.451126.50 507kN
M ed
At ends Med 0
=0
z
Ftd=0.5 VEd( cot cot )
=0.51126.501=563.25kN
Also another value of Fs appear fig-16.2(A) is
M Ed
+ N Ed =0
z
Fs+ Ftd =563.25+507=1070.25kn<2552.112 kn=(FRs)o.g
At middle,
M ed
M edmax
=
z
z
M ed
7412 106
(
)O.G=
=5280 kN
z
0.9 1560
6
M ed
5169 10
(
)I.G=
=3682kN
z
0.9 1560
(Fs)O.G=5280kn,(Fs)i.g=3682kN
M Edmax
( VEd=0& also
Ftd<
)
z
(FRS)O.G=2552.1122=5104.224kN
(FRS)I.G=1778.542=3557.08kN
As per clause -16.5.4(5) of irc:112-2011,4-16mm bars which are provided as
side face reinforcement will be serving as resisting bars for bending of girder
section. So tensile capacity of total 4-16mm bars is given by,
So (FRS)O.G=5104.224+290.374=6394.60 kN >(ok)
(FRS)I.G=3847.454kN >3682kN (ok)
3.6.15
DESIGN OF CROSS GIRDER:

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
Self-weight=0.31.425=10.5 kN/m
Slab load will be distributed as shown below

Fig-26 (Dead load distribution from slab onCross Girder)


Dead load from slab =20.52.51.258.46=26.4375
26.4375
=10.575 kN /m
So udl load =
2.5
Total load (dead weight) =21.075kN/m
Assuming rigid cross girder,
21.075 5
=35.125 kN
Reaction on longitudinal girder is =
3
For max. Bending moment, the loads should be kept at equal distance from
intermediate longitudinal girder of both sides of cross girder.

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Fig-27 (Wheel load arrangement for maximum bending moment on Cross


Girder)
Now for calculating load, following diagram may be provided at beneficial
Load on cross girder from one wheel
350 ( 4.5075 0.9 )

=280.12 kN
= 2
2
4.5078
Reaction on each longitudinal girder
280.12 2
=186.75 kN
=
3
Max. Bending moment on cross girder under load =186.751.475=275.456 kN-m
In checking impact, Mc =303kN-m
Dead load moment under wheel load ,
( 1.475 )2
= 35.125 1.475 21.075
=28.884 kN m
2
Total design moment=332kN-m
Ultimate moment = Mu =498kN-m
Since the cross girder fixed at intermediate girder,(-)ve moment will exist.

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
As per D.J victor, Essential Bridges Engineering, referring to Morrice-Little method,
distribution coefficient=0.416
So negative moment =0.146 49873 kN-m
Since its flange d beam,assuming neutral axis in side flange,
Mu =21241.143kN-m>>>>>498kN-m
498 106
=886.45 m m2
(Ast )+ve=
250
0.87 415 1660 1 0.416
1600
Providing 4-20mm bars
(Ast )provided=1256.64mm2
Provision of 4-16-mm bars at top will give
(Ast )-ve=804.25mm2>(Ast )required =135.152mm2
Provide 4-12mm bars each face uniformly as side reinforcement.

3.6.15.1

SHEAR CHECK FOR CROSS GIRDERS:

Cl-10.3.2 of IRC:112-2011
K=1.33
vmin=0.281
cp=0
1 =2.61810-3
VRdc=[0.121.33(802.61810-335)0.333001600=147.831 kN
VRdc.min=0.2813001600=134.880 kN
Design shear VEd =1.5[186.75+35.125]=332.8125 kN
Extra shear to be resisted by stirrups is =184.98 185 kN
Providing 8mm dia -4 legged stirrups
Asw =201mm2
Spacing(s)= 519.43mm,8mm 4-legged @300mm c/c
Again shear reinforcement ratio

s b w sin
w =

(cl-16.5.2 of IRC 112:2000)


A

=1.289910-3

0.072 35
=1.026 103
=
(|w )
415

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

Assumimg )min ,

201
=653.021 mm>300 mm ( ok )
s=
300 11.026 103

Fig-28 (Reinforcement detailing of Cross Girder)


Clause -16.5.2 of IRC:112-2011(6, 7, 8,9,) specifies that
smin=dg+10=30mm
40mm
2s=28=16mm
Smax=0.75d(1+cot)=0.75(1+0)=1245mm
As per the Clause -16.5.3 of IRC:112-2011,
The links will not to be of greater spacing of following
1/8 (perimeter of member)=487.5mm
or 350mm
Our provision of 300m (okay)
3.6.16
MODIFIED ANCHORAGE FOR BARS AT THE ENDS OF GIRDERS:
At the ends of girders,bearing available is only 450mm.hence standard 90 bend as
per fig 15.2 of irc:112-2011 will be provided.
So modified lb.net will be
lb.net =0.7lb1=0.7lb
lb =903mm(for 30mm bars)
lb =843mm(for 28mm bars)
(lb.net)O.G =632mm
(lb.net)I.G =590mm

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA

REFERENCES:
1. IRC:112-2011; CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES, INDIAN
ROAD CONGRESS
2. IRC:6-2014; STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE OF PRACTICE FOR ROAD
BRIDGES; SECTION : II LOADS AND STRESSES
3. IRC:6-2010; STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND CODE OF PRACTICE FOR ROAD
BRIDGES; SECTION : II LOADS AND STRESSES
4. IRC-SP-13; GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIN OF SMALL BRIDGES AND CULVERTS
5. IS 456 : 2000; INDIAN STANDARD PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE CODE
OF PRACTICE
6. IS-SP-16; DESIGN AIDS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE TO IS : 456-1978
7. IS : 875 1987; INDIAN STANDARD CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN LOADS
(OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE) FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCUTRES
8. IS-SP : 34(S&T)-1987; HANDBOOK ON CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT AND
DETAILING

BY:
ABHISEK PANDA
9. ESSENTIALS OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING; VICTOR D.J; OXFORD&IBH
PUBLICATION
10.

DESIGN OF BRIDGES; RAJU N.K; OXFORD&IBH PUBLICATION

11.
R.C.C DESIGNS ; PUNMIA B.C, JAIN A.K AND JAIN A.K; LAXMI
PUBLICATIONS
12.

REINFORCED CONCRETE VOL.I; SHAH H.J; CHAROTAR PUBLICATIONS

13.
LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE; VARGHESE P.C; PHI
LEARNING
14.
THEORY OF STRUCTURES; RAMAMRUTHAM S. AND NARAYAN R.;
DHANPATRAI PUBLISHING COMPANY
15.

HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; KHANNA S.K. AND JUSTO C.E.G.

16.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & ENGINEERING RESEARCH
VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 3 ,MARCH 2013 (ISSN 2229 -5518) STUDY OF
EFFECTIVENESS OF COURBON S THEORY IN THE ANALYSIS OF T BEAM
BRIDGES BY: M.G. KALYAN & HETTI &R. P. SHRIRAM

Вам также может понравиться