An example calculation to aid the adjustment and testing of the protectin...

1 de 3

http://rimstar.org/zoltans/coronaring.htm

An example calculation to aid the adjustment and testing of the

protecting corona-rings in a specific HV probe
A sample HV probe has been designed and built by Steven Dufresne to handle max. 150 kV input
voltage. The HV probe is made of a 5M output resistance (10M resistor in parallel with the 10M
inner resistance of the digital multimeter), and 25 pieces of 200M resistors (not all shown in the
figures) of the type MX440 from CADDOC Electronics, each having a max. voltage of 11 kV. This
design is not ideal, but it serves learning and experimental purposes.
According to the specification of the DMM the max. allowed voltage on its probes may not exceed
1000V. Steve decided not to allow more than 950V at the output Uox. Our task is to create and test
protecting corona rings around the leads of certain resistors. If the 200M resistors at the HV side of
the probe would breakdown and be shorted then the corona ring should attract a spark to the
ground to prevent the rise of the output voltage above 950V, and thus protect the instrument.
The protecting ring or rings can be placed around the resistor lead between the 5M and the last
200M resistor, or better between the 200M resistors one or two stages before that point. Steve has
chosen to place two corona rings, at two places as shown on the figure below. How can we make,
adjust and test these rings so that they should be activated at the appropriate voltages and provide
reliable protection? The following calculation is meant to aid the adjustment.

Since the allowed max. output voltage is 950V, the allowed max. current is:
. However this current would create a voltage drop of
on a single 200M resistor, which exceeds the maximally allowed
11kV for those resistors. Thus the allowed max. current may be not bigger than what creates the
11kV voltage drop on the 200M resistors. If we would allow it to be bigger then all the resistors
would break down, and the HV might reach and spoil the instrument at the output. Thus the max.
. We take the practical
allowed current according to this condition is
max. current to be somewhat less and a round number of
. This can create a maximal

7/1/2016 16:26

An example calculation to aid the adjustment and testing of the protectin...

2 de 3

http://rimstar.org/zoltans/coronaring.htm

output voltage of
that corresponds to 250kV max. input voltage at the
HV end. This is a good value since the probe was designed to measure max. 150kV.
Now we can calculate the max. allowed voltages at the points 1 and 2 in the figure below, where
the rings are located

and
. We can take the rounded
practical max. values of 10kV at point 1, and 20kV at point 2. The function of the corona rings is to
prevent the rise of the voltage at these two points above these max. values by creating a spark to
the ground. Now the size of the rings and the air-gaps can be adjusted empirically to spark at these
voltages. The problem is only how to do this without damaging the instrument and with a HV
source that can deliver only 62kV. The 62kV would create a max current of
that in turn would produce max.
and
. These voltages are not enough to adjust the rings to spark at
10kV and 20kV.
Therefore the rings should not be created and adjusted at the points 1 and 2 where they will have to
be placed before final assembly, but at other points closer to the HV end, where the desired
voltages can be achieved even with the max. 62kV input. The available HV supply can reliably
deliver a voltage approximately between 30kV and 60kV. For the sake of easy adjustment we can
take the middle of this voltage range 45kV to serve as the input voltage that should create the
desired test voltages at certain points.
If the input voltage is 45kV and we have 25 pieces of 200M resistors then the voltage drop on one
resistor is about 45kV/25=1.8kV. So the closest point to the output where we can get the 10kV is
10kV/1.8kV=5.56. By ignoring the decimals we get that the first ring should be created and tested
at point 5 in the above drawing, and when it works correctly then moved to the final destination of
point 1.
If we want 10kV at point 5 then the current should be
. This
current will create an output voltage (indicated by the instrument) of
, which corresponds to 49.75kV at the input. That means, the ring at point 5 should be adjusted
empirically to allow the voltage to rise up to 49.75V at the output (when the input HV is manually
increased, slowly) without sparking. But this voltage limit should not be exceeded, since for higher
voltages spark should jump between the point 5 and the corona ring, and prevent higher output
voltage. When the ring is adjusted, it should be removed until the second ring is adjusted in similar
fashion.
For the adjustment of the second ring we need 20kV. The closest test point to the output that can
have this voltage at 45kV input is calculated as: 20kV/1.8kV=11.11. By ignoring the decimals we
get the point 11 as the new place for the second ring to be adjusted. To get the 20kV there we need
. Finally the output voltage that this current
a current of
creates is
which corresponds to 45.35kV at the input. The
adjustment of the second ring to spark at this voltage is similar as for the first ring described above.

7/1/2016 16:26

An example calculation to aid the adjustment and testing of the protectin...

3 de 3

http://rimstar.org/zoltans/coronaring.htm

The derived voltages should be considered to be peek voltages, so if the output wave form of the
HV supply is rectified sine wave or other shape that significantly differs from the smooth DC, then
a correction factor should be taken into account when reading the displayed values of the digital
multimeter. Another alternative is to read the peek voltage with an oscilloscope. In our case the AC
ripple was less than 10% of the DC component so we may take 10% less output measured voltages
on the DMM to be allowed by the ring, in order to compensate for the ripple (or just read the peak
value directly with the scope).
Before the final assembly both rings should be removed from the point 11 and 5, and placed at
points 2 and 1 to provide the right protection (and not to spark before the desired voltages).

Created by Zoltan Losonc (feprinciples@on.mailshell.com) on 21 July 2003. Last updated on 6 September 2003.

Instrument component
PROTECTIVE CORONA-RING CALCULATIONS

7/1/2016 16:26