Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Poor sanitation. Pollution. Wasteful irrigation. The planet's freshwater supply is terribly managed
By Bret Schulte
Posted 5/27/07
Over the course of the past 40 years, north Africa's Lake Chad has shriveled to one tenth its earlier
size, beset by decades of drought and agricultural irrigation that have sucked water from the rivers
that feed it-even as the number of people whose lives depend on its existence has grown. In 1990, the
Lake Chad basin supported about 26 million people; by 2004 the total was 37.2 million. In the next 15
years, experts predict, the incredible shrinking lake and its tapped rivers will need to support 55
million. "You don't have much room for error at this point," says hydrologist Michael Coe.
The population growth has coincided with a 25 percent decrease in rainfall, with global warming very
likely a factor. As oceans store more heat, the temperature difference between water and land
dissipates, sapping power from rainmaking monsoons. At the same time, desperate people are
overusing wells. Coe recently concluded that water supplies in the basin are "stretched to their limits,
and future needs will far outstrip the accessible supply."
Lake Chad, with its confluence of troubles, is emblematic of a burgeoning water crisis around the
world. While the western United States faces serious water problems, American money and know-how
can at least soften the blow. Not so elsewhere. Worldwide, 1.1 billion people lack clean water, 2.6
billion people go without sanitation, and 1.8 million children die every year because of one or the
other, or both. By 2025, the United Nations predicts 3 billion people will be scrambling for clean water.
There are myriad problems: industrial contaminants flooding waterways, wasteful irrigation, an
exploding world population, political corruption and incompetence, and a changing climate-to name a
few.
In a report issued in November, the United Nations declared water "a global crisis," announcing that
55 member nations are failing to meet their water-related Millennium Development Goal target, agreed
upon in 2000, of halving the proportion of people without clean water and sanitation by 2015. The real
crisis, experts say, is not a lack of water but a lack of water management. Water doesn't always
appear in the right places, or at the right times. And it has to be cared for. "It's a terrible situation
around the world," says Peter Rogers, a Harvard environmental engineering professor, "but it doesn't
have to be."
One percent. Just 3 percent of the world's water is fresh. Of that, most is locked in the ground,
glaciers, or ice caps. That leaves about 1 percent for the world's 6.6 billion people. As population
grows, so does demand for water-but at two to three times the rate. People consume water for
drinking, for hygiene, through food production, and in a variety of industrial processes. A blossoming
middle class in Southeast Asia, India, and China will join the West in consuming far more than the
minimum 20 to 50 liters (about five to 13 gallons) of water per day necessary per person. (Americans
lead the world by consuming 400 to 600 liters per day, or as much as 158 gallons.) Upward mobility
has yielded more flush toilets and a dietary shift from grain to meat-heavy diets. Raising a cow
requires a thousand times more water than the equivalent average for grain.
The rush from farms to cities in developing countries is increasing the stress on water sources and
taxing inadequate infrastructure. With more than 50 percent of the world's population now in urban
areas, cities are depleting groundwater sources and dumping industrial pollution and waste into rivers,
destroying them as sources of clean water. "It's a failure of governments," says Peter Gleick, president
of the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, "to either set
priorities ... or to meet basic needs."
In teeming New Delhi, middle-class denizens tote the latest cellphones, but their home faucets, at
best, work a few hours a day. A third of the city's water is lost in cracked, aging pipes. The poor in
India's expanding slums don't have even that much; they must wait for water to arrive in trucks, which
costs them more than piped water. In cities like Jakarta, Indonesia, slum dwellers pay five to 10 times
more for water than the wealthy.
Untreated. Sanitation is the bigger mess, so to speak, because of uncontrolled urban growth. The
Yamuna River, once a lifeline to New Delhi, is now an open sewer-used by those without toilets. And
about half of the waste that goes through the city's sewage system is untreated before being dumped
into the river. Open defecation is standard practice in much of the developing world. A lack of
sanitation and clean water has helped make diarrhea the world's No. 2 killer of children. "They have
water to drink. That's not the problem," says Andrew Hudson, director of water governance for the
United Nations Development Program. "They don't have safe water to drink."
Studies have shown that providing clean water and sanitation brings tremendous benefits. Health
costs go down. People live longer, stay healthier, and become more productive. But "financiers ... want
to invest in energy, telecoms, highways, high-speed trains, you name it," says Harvard's Rogers. "The
problem is [water] yields social benefits, so no one individual can afford to do it." Industrialization of
the developing world is a primary driver of water stress. Factories provide jobs, which attract people.
They also use a lot of water. In China, industrialization will require a fivefold increase in water use by
2030.
The countryside poses its own problems. The developing world has followed America's lead in relying
heavily on groundwater irrigation to expand its farm economy. Agriculture is the world's top user of
water-as high as 80 percent in some countries-and it's also perhaps the most inefficient. In Chennai,
India, drinking water must be trucked in, but outside city limits, farmers use gallon after gallon to
irrigate rice, an extremely water-intensive grain.
Solving these problems requires money, but aid is down to a trickle. In the late 1990s, public spending
on water and sanitation was 2 percent of the GDP in most countries. Today it's less than 1 percent as
countries devote more resources to education, roads, and other priorities. Foreign assistance,
meanwhile, has stagnated at about $15 billion a year, though the World Bank is calling for twice that
amount.
In 2005, Congress passed the Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act, which requires the
government to implement a strategy to help developing countries provide clean water, but not a dime
has yet been appropriated. "We get an awful lot of interest and oversight from Congress on this issue,"
says Claudia McMurray, the assistant secretary for oceans, environment, and science at the U.S.
Department of State, "but it really does need the financial backing in order to make it work." The
United States still spent $1.7 billion on water-related aid from fiscal years 2003 to 2005, but
occasionally that funding has been directed toward broader strategic interests; McMurray says a
chunk of water-development money today goes to Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We have a moral and fiscal responsibility here," Gleick says. "We have the brains, we have the
money ... to solve water supply and sanitation problems, but we're not meeting those responsibilities."
And for millions of people, the luxury of time is evaporating.
This story appears in the June 4, 2007 print edition of U.S. News & World Report.
Copyright 2007 U.S.News & World Report, L.P. All rights reserved.