Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • DESMA9 Grading RubricF

    Загружено:

    poopie23
    21 просмотров2 страницы
    This document outlines grading rubrics for blog posts, midterm projects, and final projects. It evaluates projects on communicating meaning, organization, visual appeal/finesse, attention to details, and portrayal of student perspective. Higher grades require clear communication, well organization, visual appeal/creativity, thorough attention to details, and convincingly showing student perspective. Points are deducted for too few sources/references, improper citation style, and too few images.

    Исходное описание:

    ya VV

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    This document outlines grading rubrics for blog posts, midterm projects, and final projects. It evaluates projects on communicating meaning, organization, visual appeal/finesse, attention to details, and portrayal of student perspective. Higher grades require clear communication, well organization, visual appeal/creativity, thorough attention to details, and convincingly showing student perspective. Points are deducted for too few sources/references, improper citation style, and too few images.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    21 просмотров2 страницы

    DESMA9 Grading RubricF

    Загружено:

    poopie23
    This document outlines grading rubrics for blog posts, midterm projects, and final projects. It evaluates projects on communicating meaning, organization, visual appeal/finesse, attention to details, and portrayal of student perspective. Higher grades require clear communication, well organization, visual appeal/creativity, thorough attention to details, and convincingly showing student perspective. Points are deducted for too few sources/references, improper citation style, and too few images.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 2

    GRADING RUBRIC for BLOG POSTS

    DESMA 9, 2015

    C and lower

    B- / B

    B+

    A / A+

    Project doesn't convey


    meaning

    Project partially
    communicates meaning

    Project adequately
    communicates meaning

    Project clearly
    communicates meaning

    no organization evident

    lack of organization

    generally organized

    well organized

    lacks appeal and finesse

    attempt at visual appeal


    and finesse

    visually appealing and


    fine tuned

    visually appealing,
    creative and artistic

    little or no attention to
    details

    Slight attention to details

    strong attention to details

    thorough attention to
    details

    minimal response from


    students

    may or may not draw


    students POV and reaction

    shows some hint of


    students POV and reaction

    convincingly shows
    students POV and reaction

    FOR REFERENCES AND IMAGES:


    > Not enough sources/references: -0.5 points for only using 3 or 4 sources,
    -1 point if using 1 or 2 sources, -1.5 points if no sources are used.
    > Sources not cited in MLA style: -0.5 points
    >Not enough images: -0.5 points

    GRADING RUBRIC for MIDTERM and FINAL


    DESMA 9, 2015

    C and lower

    B- / B

    B+

    A / A+

    Project doesn't convey


    meaning

    Project partially
    communicates meaning

    Project adequately
    communicates meaning

    Project clearly
    communicates meaning

    no organization evident

    lack of organization

    generally organized

    well organized

    lacks appeal and finesse

    attempt at visual appeal


    and finesse

    visually appealing and


    fine tuned

    visually appealing,
    creative and artistic

    little or no attention to
    details

    Slight attention to details

    strong attention to details

    thorough attention to
    details

    minimal response from


    students

    may or may not draw


    students POV and reaction

    shows some hint of


    students POV and reaction

    convincingly shows
    students POV and reaction

    FOR REFERENCES AND IMAGES:


    > Not enough sources/references: 5 points for only using 3 or 4 sources, 10
    point if using 1 or 2 sources, 15 points if no sources are used.
    > Sources not cited in MLA style: 5 points
    >Not enough images: 5 points

    Вам также может понравиться