Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract- Tiger nut tubers (Cyperus esculentus L) milk and egusi melon (Colocynthis citrullus)
seeds milk were selected for production of candies. The candies developed from tiger nuts and
egusi melon seeds milk and their blends were subjected to sensory and physicochemical
analysis. Results showed that the candies had no significant difference (p<0.05) in acceptability
of sensory parameters viz, appearance, taste, flavour, and mouth feel. Sample 70:30 (70% tiger
nuts milk and 30% melon seeds milk candy) was significantly (p<0.05) lower than other samples
in terms of general acceptability while 100% tiger nut milk candy was most preferred.The candies
and the milk had vitamin compositions ranging from 0.04mg/100 to 0.06mg/100 vitamin A and
0.09mg/100 to 0.91mg/100 vitamin C. Protein and minerals like sodium, calcium, magnesium
and potassium were significantly increased (p<0.05) in 100% tiger nut milk candy while iron was
higher in 100% melon milk candy.
Keywords: tiger nut tubers milk, melon seeds, candy, sensory evaluation.
GJSFR-D Classification : FOR Code: 309999
2015. Obasi, Nneoma Elechi & Ugwu, Vanessa Chidinma. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting
all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Introduction
2015
I.
X Issue II Version I
D ) Volume XV
Year
2015
Year
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
D ) Volume XV
X Issue II Version I
10
a) Proximate Analysis
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
a) Statistical analysis
VII.
Mineral Analysis
c) Iron Determination
a) Vitamin C Determination
Sensory Evaluation
2015
Year
11
X.
X Issue II Version I
D ) Volume XV
v. Protein determination
The micro-kjeldahl method a described by
James (1995) was used to determine the protein content
of the samples.
vi. Carbohydrate determination
The carbohydrate contents of the test samples
were determined by estimation using the arithmetic
difference method described by James (1995).
Year
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
D ) Volume XV
X Issue II Version I
12
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Conclusion
12.
13.
14.
15.
2015
Year
2.
13
X Issue II Version I
D ) Volume XV
1.
2015
XI.
tiger nuts milk and 30% melon seeds milk) had the
lowest (6.87) mean score. This indicated that 50:50
(50% tiger nuts milk and 50% melon seeds milk) candy
and 70:30 (70% tiger nuts milk and 30% melon seeds
milk) candy were liked very much and slightly
respectively by the panelists and there was no
significant difference (p<0.05) among the samples. In
terms of taste, 100% tiger nuts milk candy ranked
highest (7.53). There was no significant difference
(p<0.05) among the samples. 100 melon seeds milk
candy had the highest (7.00) mean score with respect to
flavour while 70:30 (70% tiger nuts milk and 30% melon
seeds milk) had the lowest mean score (6.13) and there
was no significant difference (p<0.05) among the
samples. The mouth-feel of 100% tiger nuts milk candy
had the highest (7.33) mean score while 70:30 had the
lowest mean score (5.57). No significant difference
(p<0.05) existed among the samples. For general
acceptability, 100% tiger nuts milk candy had the
highest mean score (7.33) which indicated that the
sample was moderately accepted by the panelists.
70:30 (70% tiger nuts milk and 30% melon seeds milk)
was the least accepted with lowest mean score of 5.97.
There was no significant difference (p<0.05) among the
samples except for 70:30 (70% tiger nuts milk and 30%
melon seeds milk) value. From the result obtained in
Table 4., 100% tiger nut milk candy had the highest
mean score (7.33) in terms of general acceptability
which indicates that it is the most preferred by the
panelists. This implies that tiger nuts milk can be used
for candy production.
Therefore, it has been applied successfully in
the making of candy which had comparable nutritional
values with candy made from cow milk. This means that
the production of such candies on a large scale would
be a wise way of utilizing these crops. It would also
provide an opportunity of purchasing these products at
affordable prices which will in turn make the beneficial
nutrients present in the crops available to the
consumers through the candies, especially African
children.
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
Year
2015
D ) Volume XV
X Issue II Version I
14
)
Plate 2 : Tiger nuts milk
2015
Year
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
X Issue II Version I
D ) Volume XV
15
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
Toasting (3min)
2015
Boiling (15min)
Year
Cooling (28oC)
16
D ) Volume XV
X Issue II Version I
Milling
Filtering
)
Sorting and washing
Soaking (8 hours)
Grinding/ milling
Maceration (10 minutes)
Extracting/ sieving (using muslin cloth)
Packaging
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
Milk blend
Year
2015
Adding lime
X Issue II Version I
D ) Volume XV
17
Cooking (60min)
Cooling (45oC)
)
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research
Candy
100
100
100
90
10
80
20
70
30
60
40
50
50
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
Ingredients
Sugar
Lime
Glucose syrup
100
8
30
Moisture content
(%)
Crude protein
(%)
Ash content
(%)
Fat content
(%)
Carbohydrate
(%)
2.65f0.07
2.11c0.01
1.15cd0.07
2.10c0.00
91.73cd0.14
18
3.02e 0.01
3.86b0.00
0.80g0.00
1.75d0.07
90.58d0.06
4.31c0.01
1.35e0.00
1.25b0.07
1.41f0.01
91.69cd0.08
3.65d0.07
1.32ef0.00
1.03e0.00
1.32g0.01
92.67bc0.06
2.14g0.01
1.21h0.01
1.11d0.01
1.51e0.01
95.0a1.44
3.11e0.01
1.24g0.01
0.93f0.01
1.31g0.01
93.42b0.00
2.14g0.00
1.15i0.00
1.21bc0.00
1.51e0.01
93.00bc1.41
3.13e0.04
1.04j0.01
0.71h0.01
1.73d0.01
93.28b0.22
83.2a0.01
1.52d0.01
1.49a0.00
7.31b0.01
8.02f0.02
73.9b0.01
4.13a0.01
1.21bc0.01
8.21a0.01
12.56e0.01
LSD
0.08
0.08
0.05
0.01
1.43
D ) Volume XV
X Issue II Version I
2015
Year
Table 3 : Proximate composition of tiger nut tubers milk, melon seeds milk and the candies
*Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Table 4 : Vitamin contents (mg/100g) of tiger nut tubers milk, melon seeds milk and the candies
*Milk and candy samples
Vitamin C
Vitamin A
0.84 0.01
0.060.00
0.91b0.01
0.040.00
0.34g0.01
0.22 0.01
0.09i0.01
0.44 0.01
0.79e0.01
0.84c0.01
0.79e0.00
1.19a0.01
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
Iron
Magnesium
Calcium
152.50 0.71
140.0 0.00
0.46 0.00
32.25 0.07
110.00c0.00
100%Tigernut candy
180.50b0.71
172.0b0.00
0.57i0.21
47.50b0.71
125.10b0.00
3.20i0.00
68.65d0.00
5.26c0.01
16.25d0.07
90.15d0.07
6.20i0.00
71.25e0.07
1.28e0.01
12.05f0.07
63.25f0.07
11.25d0.07
60.35e0.07
1.31d0.01
8.70g0.00
48.25g0.07
9.15e0.07
57.30f0.14
1.13f0.01
6.05h0.07
36.25h0.07
7.05f0.07
50.05g0.07
1.03g0.00
6.00h0.00
27.15i0.21
4.25h0.07
46.00h0.07
5.90+0.00
12.30f0.00
81.20e0.00
2.75i0.07
68.00d0.00
6.71a0.01
13.60e0.85
81.00e1.41
203.00a0.00
194.0a00.00
0.61h0.00
51.50a0.71
152.00a0.00
LSD
0.71
1.02
0.93
0.20
0.03
*Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
Table 6 : Sensory Quality Scores of the Candy samples
Appearance
Taste
Flavour
Mouthfeel
General acceptability
100% cow
7.21bc1.20
6.73abc1.66
6.37ab1.22
6.33bc1.67
6.53ab1.20
100% Tigernut
8.10a0.89
7.53a1.01
6.93a1.34
7.33a1.58
7.33a1.09
100% melon
7.77ab1.07
7.30ab1.53
7.00a1.51
7.00ab1.53
6.97ab1.07
8.13a0.82
6.50bc1.43
6.87ab1.25
6.43abc1.63
6.67ab0.96
7.37bc1.16
6.93ab1.66
6.87ab1.41
7.23ab1.55
7.17ab1.29
6.87c0.97
5.97c1.45
6.13bc1.07
5.57c1.83
5.97c1.19
7.03c1.27
6.67bc1.42
6.83ab1.32
6.67ab1.69
6.73ab1.26
7.47bc1.04
7.00ab1.58
6.80ab1.67
6.90ab1.65
7.03ab1.47
0.78
0.75
0.69
0.83
0.61
*Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05).
2015
19
*Candy samples
Year
Potassium
X Issue II Version I
D ) Volume XV
Sodium
2015
Table 5 : Mineral contents(mg/100g) of tigernut tubers milk,melon seeds milk and their candies
Year
2015
Quality Characteristics of Candies Produced from Tiger Nuts Tubers (Cyperus esculentus) and Melon Seeds
(Colocynthis citrullus. L ) Milk Blend
D ) Volume XV
X Issue II Version I
20
)
2015