Explore Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Nursing in Healthcare Setting Using Behavioral Theory

Explore Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Nursing in Healthcare Setting Using Behavioral
Theory1
EXPLORE HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE AMONG NURSING IN HEALTHCARE

SETTING USING BEHAVIORAL THEORY
By Tumusiime Isaac
+254712214954
Theory2
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
The behavioural theory................................................................................................................4
Global statistics............................................................................................................................4
United Kingdom..........................................................................................................................5
The problem (Justification of Study)...........................................................................................5
Literature Review............................................................................................................................6
Behavioural practices...................................................................................................................6
Compliance..................................................................................................................................8
Compliance enablers and barriers................................................................................................9
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................10
Education and training...............................................................................................................10
Hand hygiene feedback and monitoring....................................................................................11
Direct observation......................................................................................................................12
Inventive electronic methods.....................................................................................................12
Monthly auditing.......................................................................................................................13
Hand hygiene and infection control laws and policies..............................................................14
Change of strategy.....................................................................................................................14
Need for further research...........................................................................................................15
References......................................................................................................................................15
Theory3
Introduction
Hand Hygiene is a broad term mentioning any hand cleansing action (WHO 2016, P.4).
Hand hygiene, whether by hand disinfection or washing, remains the sole utmost significant
measure to avoid nosocomial contaminations. A healthcare related infection is attained by ill
people in receipt of such care and denotes the greatest recurrent adverse occurrence. Healthcare
associated infection compliance is multifaceted and needs the practice of standardized measures,
accessibility of diagnostic amenities and proficiency to conduct and understand the outcomes
(Hand Hygiene Australia, 2016). While surveillance and compliance structures for healthcare
associated infection are present in several developed nations, they are almost absent in majority
of developing nations. Using the behavioural theory, I explore hand hygiene compliance among
nursing in the healthcare setting in this paper. In addition, I ascertain the enablers and barriers to
nurse compliance to hand hygiene, and develop behavioural theory-founded data translation
intercession to grow nurses compliance with best practices of hand hygiene.
The behavioural theory
The behavioural theory states that valuable approaches to enhance hand hygiene
behaviors associate with individual opinions that stimulate the intent to execute hand hygiene.
The theory points out behavioral intention determinants to include; first, the individual has faith
in hand hygiene at time of such care avoids spreading of bacteria and injury of patient from heath
associated infections. Second, the personal believes that supervisors, peers and patients expect
and value hand hygiene compliance. Third, the individual beliefs of possession of authority over
Theory4
resources are essential to observe hand hygiene and removal of performance barriers (Bradley,
2016). Targeted motivators are indicated by the barrier, belief, and/or behavior assessment
results.
Global statistics
Overall estimations show that over One point four million ill persons internationally in
both developing and developed nations are infected by hand hygiene incompliance diseases at
whichever time. In 2005, the World Health Organisation Patient Safety initiated the first
international challenge on Patient safety to incite international action and focus on the serious
patient care problem of healthcare associated infection and on the important of the compliance of
hand hygiene role by healthcare personnel in reducing such contagions. According to available
country or multicentre research, mutual HCAI occurrence in mixed patient populaces was seven
point six per cent in developed nations (WHO Report on the Burden of HCAIs 2011, p.3). The
Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Europe assesses that about 4 million ill persons
contract healthcare associated infections in the European Union annually. The sum of deaths
happening as a direct result of these infections is predicted at thirty seven thousand and the
infections contribute a supplementary 120 000 losses annually. In 2002, the projected HCAI
prevalence rate in the US was 4.5 per cent, consistent to 9.3 contaminations for every 1200
patient-days and one point seven million affected ill persons.
On average, 61 per cent of health personnel do not observe commended hand hygiene
regulations and practices. Nearly 20000 health institutions in over 180 countries worldwide have
preserved compliance with hand hygiene and enhancement through the Clean Your Hands
crusade (WHO Healthcare, 2016). About 20 to 30 per cent of healthcare related infections are
reflected to be avoidable by rigorous hygiene and control platforms.
Theory5
United Kingdom
In the 1998 to 2000 in England, a nurse-ran multiprofessional researchers team of and
expert clinicians aided the Department of Health initially to commission country evidencegrounded plans for averting health care-linked contaminations in country health provision
hospitals and established. Even though medical personnel compliance to hand hygiene is below
the country 75% target, there is continual rise in compliance to hand hygiene in healthcare staff
as of 2009. Medical nurses now have compliance to hand hygiene rate of 71 per cent per 2014,
just overhead the 2014 nationwide doctors-rate of 69 per cent.
The problem (Justification of Study)
Health care workers, when invited to estimate their compliance to hand washing
regularity, have a habit of reporting a considerable higher acquiescence rate than in fact observed
(Tibballs 1996, p.1). Although it is conceivable that selected providers might be merely lying
about their compliance to hand-hygiene, appears additional possible that a greater amount of this
inconsistency is because of worker self-deceit. Self-deception is having an erroneous idea or
belief regardless of accessibility of supplementary accurate evidence, short of carrying along the
identical moral inferences as modestly lying. However in the health care workers case, who have
faith they are sufficiently following protocols of hand hygiene when in actual sense not, the
negative costs continue stay unchanged. Self-deception is subliminal, so, abundant resistance to
behaviour adjustment (Mele 2001, p. 5).
Theory6
Literature Review
Behavioural practices
In 1998, researchers reviewed the dominant behavioural theories and corresponding
applications in regards to the health experts in an effort to well understand ways to broaden more
successful intercessions (Kretzer 1998, p.317). The researchers suggested a hypothetical basis to
improve practices on hand hygiene and emphasized the significance of bearing in mind
individual complexities and institutional aspects when crafting behavioural intercessions.
Although such theories on behaviour and subordinate interventions have predominantly targeted
individual personnel, this exercise might be inadequate to yield sustained transformation.
Interventions intended to improve hand hygiene rehearsals ought to explain the different stages
of behaviour collaboration.
Fuller and associates recently directed a mass randomised well-ordered pilot of a
behaviourally premeditated response intercession in over 60 infirmary zones throughout Wales
and in England implementing a nationwide campaign on hand hygiene. Results showed that such
intervention, coupled with response to individualized action preparation, as related to routine
care, formed significant and moderate sustained developments in compliance to hand hygiene
(Fuller et al., 2012). Although this research indicates encouraging effects for the usage of
behaviourally planned response interventions to advance compliance to hand hygiene, additional
execution studies are compulsory to define the effect of intervention in diverse contexts and
settings.
The interdependence of discrete factors, ecological restraints, and formal climate has to
be considered in the premeditated planning and advance of campaigns on hand hygiene.
Theory7
Interventions to endorse hand hygiene in infirmaries ought to deliberate on variables at every
such level. Numerous factors engaged in behaviour on hand hygiene comprise of attitude,
intention in the direction of the behaviour, apparent social custom, perceived behavioural control,
threat for infection perceived, practices on hand hygiene, role model perception, knowledge
perceived, and inspiration. Factors essential for change consist of: One, the dissatisfaction with
prevailing state; two, the alternatives perception, and Three, the recognition, at both individual
and institutional levels, of the capacity and likeliness to transform. Though the latter suggests
motivation and education, the former two require a change in system.
The Hand Hygiene in Health Care Guidelines of the World Health Organisation provides
a broad scientific data review on practices and rationale for hand-hygiene in healthcare. An
overall of eight hundred and seven healthcare facilities from ninety one nations submitted a
completed the self-valuation framework on hand-hygiene surveys to the World Health
Organisation. Amongst all these, eighty six facilities finalized the survey in 2015and 2011. It is
in Malaysia that the biggest number of contributing facilities, 150 facilities, is reported in the
2015 to 2016 survey. France follows with 65 facilities and Spain with 49 facilities. In total, of the
participating institutions, 30 % were established in the Europe, the biggest figure by area. The
total mean tally revealed an intermediate progress level, nonetheless very near to the higher
range limit, score 375, for this kind of level and near the lesser range limit for the progressive
level, as the World Health Organisation HHSAF defines (WHO Report 2016, p.3). Majority of
the facilities were at 87.5 %, advanced or intermediate progress levels, with 79 % at a great
fraction of qualifying for the level of leadership.
Theory8
Compliance
A cross-sector observational research by means of technique of direct observation was
carried out in the operating ICU of a hospital to evaluate HH adherence amongst healthcare
personnel and associated nurses, at their training period completion. The outcomes indicate a 78
% total compliance as required by World Health Organisation Guidelines. 63 % rate for Nurses
adherence and 86.5 % adherence by allied staff. Patient contact Compliance before and after was
63 % and 93 % respectively. Compliance by nurses before aseptic processes was lowermost at
39%. Staffs aware of the facts before such procedures were 92 % (Shukla, Chavali and Menon,
2014).
For the five WHO indications, another observational research was piloted on hand
hygiene compliance. During a patient care routine in a day shift, there was observation of
healthcare workers. The researchers, with alcohol-founded disinfectants, similarly measured the
HH technique of hand hygiene. An overall of seven hundred and four hand hygiene opportunities
were acknowledged all through the observation timeframe. 37.0 % was the general compliance
(that is 261 out of 704). Such compliance varied by duty: 41.4 % for nurses and 31.9% for
doctors. With 63.6 %, HCWs seemed more declined to using water and soap in comparison to
the 36.3% who preferred waterless or alcohol centred hand hygiene Devotion to practice of hand
hygiene and practice of alcohol-centred disinfectant was establish as being actually low
(Karaaslan et al., 2014). Operational education packages improving hand hygiene adherence and
disinfectants use may well be supportive to intensify hand hygiene compliance.
Karabay 2005, p.315 notes that compliance to hand hygiene is understood more in
recently employed staff and subordinate nurses, and Akyol 2007, p.431 claims that in
comparison to physicians, compliance to hand hygiene is greater among nurses and
Theory9
supplementary Healthcare personnel. Ott & French 2009, p. 702 propose the behaviour and
attitudes aimed at hand hygiene are a multifarious issue that involves the discernment of its
efficiency, personnel beliefs, ideals and prevailing blockades. Defaulters must be disciplined as if
they have dishonoured hospital rule in order to attain high hand hygiene compliance rates,
beginning with private therapy to oral caution and ultimately a formal caution retained in such
workers files.
Compliance enablers and barriers
By means of a behavioural theory methodology, Boscart and associates reconnoitred
nurses professed enablers and barriers to practice of hand hygiene. Nurses paid attention on
instant consequences; for instance, the nurses acknowledged their individual and family safety as
central motivation source of performing hand hygiene. Similarly, they defined the significance of
self-monitoring and discrete feedback to upturn their routine (Boscart et al. 2012, p.1). In the
current attitudes in the direction of hand hygiene survey, doctors described recalling
implementing hand hygiene and great assignment or sense of being excessively rushed as main
barriers to compliance of hand hygiene. A second survey, which measured a variety of
Healthcare workers comprising of nurses too, found eco-friendly barriers to compliance to hand
hygiene dominant, that is, absence of soap, damaged soap distributers, and deficiency of paper
rubs (Pyne 2012, p.4). Another barrier is gaps in educational and infection governance training
amongst nurses. Supplementary barriers specific to nurses postulated comprise of the perception
amongst nurses that compliance is way better than it truly is (Tibballs 1996, p.1); the growth of a
added cavalier arrogance in the direction of infection governance as clinical experience rise, with
a related compliance rates drop (Berhe et al. 2005, p.13); the absence of encouraging role models
Theory10
amongst nurses engaged in the healthcare team; and, the resident hospital philosophy on safety
of patients.
Conclusion
I detail the necessary solutions and recommendations to nursing hand hygiene
compliance by various studies and institutions concerned with healthcare associated infection
and hand hygiene.
Education and training
All healthcare personnel require comprehensive training or education on the worth of
hand-hygiene, the My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene policy and accurate hand rub and wash
procedures (WHO 2016, p.16). By broadcasting clear communications, exclusive of personal
interpretations, with a user-positioned uniform approach, such education or training must aim at
inducing cultural and behavioural change and ensuring that competency is innate and preserved
amongst the entirety of staff in regards to hand hygiene.
Education is an essential element of strategy which incorporates sturdily with every other
indispensable strategy apparatuses. Certainly, without suitable training it is improbable the
change in system will achieve change in behaviour with the authentic adoption of alcohol
founded hand rubs and unrelenting development in compliance to hand hygiene. Feedback and
evaluation especially about native compliance results and rates from the test on knowledge
trigger courtesy to the education concepts targeted. Furthermore, majority of reminders types are
established to call consideration to main messages on education. Lastly, construction of a
genuine and strong organization safety philosophy is fundamentally related to operative
educational intercessions.
Theory11
Hand hygiene feedback and monitoring
Evaluation in addition to recurrent observing of a variety of pointers imitating handhygiene practices and infrastructures, healthcare executive managers and employees
acquaintance and awareness of the healthcare related infection problem; and the prominence of
hand-hygiene at institution of healthcare, is an essential factor of any positive campaign on
hand-hygiene (WHO, 2016). The World Health Organisation established a multimodal mode of
hand-hygiene enhancement plan tools for feedback and evaluation. Additional, the organisation
urbanized the Framework for Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment, an instrument to find a condition
examination and hand hygiene practices score and advertising in a separate facility of healthcare,
conferring to a group of indicators imitating the World Health Organisations Multimodal Hand
Hygiene Improvement Strategy (WHO HHSF, 2016). Repeated practice of the Framework
allows progress documentation over a time period.
The Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework is presently used in numerous health
care establishments internationally to track and assess advancement in improvement of handhygiene. The framework offers a methodical situation examination of hand-hygiene promotional,
setup and teaching doings, performance observation and response, and the institution safety
environment. First, it is intended as the questionnaire and organized in 5 segments founded on
the WHO Multimodal Hand Hygiene 5 Improvement Strategy components. Second, it comprises
of twenty seven indicators imitating the main elements of every strategy module and was verified
in 19 countries 26 institutions beforehand World Health Organisation issuance. Third, every
indicator is allocated a value totalling to a 100 maximum points in every section of the total 5
sections. 500 points is therefore the maximum overall HHSAF score. Founded on a institutions
Theory12
score, it is apportioned to each of four progress levels in continuum of hand hygiene
enhancement.
Direct observation
Inconspicuous straight observation of practices on hand-hygiene by an expert observer is
measured as the gold evaluation compliance standard. Hand Hygiene Australia, the Australian
national hand hygiene campaign created an internet established application on monitoring handhygiene compliance (HHCApp) liberally available for application by any other state campaigns
or such healthcare institutions. Individual and national healthcare facilities are recommended by
World Health Organisation to implement the Technology application and participate in this
international data collection project.
Inventive electronic methods
Encouraging advanced electronic schemes for automatic observation of compliance of
hand-hygiene are currently available and significantly enable data gathering. Such permit
continuous watching over a long time and such analysis and download of data automatically.
Notably, the Hawthorne effect is expressively mitigated and minimal human resources are
required (WHO literature review 2016, p.3). As long as World Health Organisation 5 moments
for hand hygiene are covered, such innovative technologies offer various returns and might well
develop the imminent tactic to monitoring compliance of hand hygiene if accessible assets
authorize.
An alternative beneficial indicator is application of hand hygiene products, in particular
the alcohol-based hand rub. Data is easily calculated and correlated with infection tendencies
over a period of time. Nevertheless, they should be used in parallel with hand hygiene
compliance data, to be accommodating in persuading HCWs behavioural change.
Theory13
Monthly auditing
In UK, A 30 day audit of compliance to hand hygiene is implemented in all in-patient
divisions with reaction given independently to clinicians. Though hand hygiene is the centre of
the audit, it provides a suggestion of infection control standards within the section (NHS UK
2016, p.7). This hygiene audit entails; first, that all infection deterrence and control strategies are
updated to reveal best exercise, national direction and direct nurses to convey finest practice and
decrease patient risk. Second, the avoidance and control of infection links employee network
extends to guarantee one linkage worker for every medical team to encourage best exercise by
being example and decreasing threats to patients. Third, link employees or nurses implement onsite audits of hand hygiene, training assemblies and aptitude assessments of fellow peers. This
progress reduces the periods consumed in lecture theatres for training conferences assisting
clinical regions to convey care of great quality.
Theory14
Hand hygiene and infection control laws and policies
The 2008 Health and Social Care Act; Code of Practice for the National Health Service
on the healthcare related infections control and prevention and the associated direction is
superior to the 2006 Health Act; practice code for the healthcare connected infections control and
prevention to state that all workers should exhibit good hygiene infection regulation and practice.
The 2008 Health and Social Care Act provides the NHS institution must maintain and
provide an appropriate and clean atmosphere for healthcare and must ensure adequate delivery of
appropriate facilities of hand washing and sterile hand rubs. The body is obliged to similarly
provide data on healthcare associated infections to boost compliance. The word healthcare
associated infections comprises of every infection by such infectious proxy attained as a result of
an individuals NHS treatment or worker of healthcare in the progress of their NHS
responsibilities (NHS 2006, P.5). Such hand hygiene is a serious feature in averting the blowout
of such infections in healthcare sceneries.
Change of strategy
A multidisciplinary, multimodal strategy is prospective necessary than the behavioural
theory. Most outstandingly, an enhancement in practices on infection governance needs First,
questioning rudimentary beliefs, Second, unceasing group assessment of stage of behavioural
variation, third, interventions with a suitable change process, and lastly, backing group and
individual creativity (Kretzer 1998, p.317). For the reason that complication of the change
process, sole interventions repeatedly end up unsuccessful. Devotion to endorsed practices of
hand hygiene must become a portion of the patient safety culture where unrelated quality
fundamentals interrelate to realize a shared goal (Boyce and Pittet, 2016). Policies to progress
adherence to practices of hand hygiene must be both multidisciplinary and multimodal.
Theory15
Need for further research

The resolution of further research is to describe and identify nurse attitudes and beliefs on
hand-hygiene and their views of the multilevel aspects that inspire such behaviour. Such allows
researchers identify elements of the evidence-practice gap, that is, why compliance to nurse hand
hygiene is inconsistent; explicit behaviours that require modification in order to raise nurse
compliance of hand-hygiene; in addition the exact goals to remain covered by the theory founded
data paraphrase intercession. Such essential initial labour generates an exhaustive appreciation of
nurses views of the multilevel elements of behaviours essential to progress nurse compliance to
hand hygiene. Prevailing data comes mainly from semi designed interviews with nurses and
inhabitants. There is need to supplement such data with nonparticipant surveillance of nurses and
inhabitants practices of hand-hygiene, throughout recurrently led clinic hand-hygiene audit
meetings and such emphasis groups with experts of hand-hygiene
In conclusion, the multimodal arrangement of structure and behavioural strategies is
essential to investigating, understanding, , and mitigation of prevailing gaps in the compliance of
hand-hygiene; removal of hindrances to routine of hand-hygiene; and encourage health care
staffs that such compliance to hand-hygiene is significant, required, besides being treasured.
References
Abbreviations
HCAI- HealthCare Associated Infection
Theory16
HH Hand Hygiene
HHCApp Hand Hygiene Compliance Application
HHSAF - Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework
MHHIS - Multimodal Hand Hygiene Improvement Strategy
WHO World Health Organisation
Journals, Articles
Akyol, A.D., 2007. Hand hygiene among nurses in Turkey: opinions and practices. Journal of
clinical nursing, 16(3), pp.431-437.
Berhe, M., Edmond, M.B. and Bearman, G.M., 2005. Practices and an assessment of health care
workers' perceptions of compliance with infection control knowledge of nosocomial
infections. American journal of infection control, 33(1), pp.55-57. [online] Available at:
http://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-6553(04)00569-3/abstract [Accessed 29 Oct.
2016].
Boscart, V., Fernie, G., Lee, J. and Jaglal, S. (2012). Using psychological theory to inform
methods to optimize the implementation of a hand hygiene intervention. Implementation
Science, [online] 7(1), p.p.1. Available at:
http://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-7-77
[Accessed 29 Oct. 2016].
Boyce, J.M., Pittet, D. and Solomon, M.D., (2002) Guidelines for Hand Hygiene in Health Care
Settings. Review of the Scientific Data Regarding Hand Hygiene. [online] Cdc.gov.
Theory17
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5116a1.htm [Accessed
28 Oct. 2016].
Bradley, S. (2016). A Systems and Behavioral Approach to Improve Hand Hygiene Practice.
[online] Patientsafetyauthority.org. Available at:
http://patientsafetyauthority.org/ADVISORIES/AdvisoryLibrary/2014/Dec;11(4)/Pages/1
63.aspx [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Fuller, C., Michie, S., Savage, J., McAteer, J., Besser, S., Charlett, A., Hayward, A., Cookson, B.,
Cooper, B., Duckworth, G., Jeanes, A., Roberts, J., Teare, L. and Stone, S. (2012). The
Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT) Improving Hand-Hygiene Compliance in UK
Healthcare Workers: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE,
[online] 7(10), p.e41617. Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?
id=10.1371/journal.pone.0041617 [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Hand Hygiene Australia, (2016). Hand Hygiene Australia - What is Hand Hygiene?. [online]
Hha.org.au. Available at: http://www.hha.org.au/AboutHandHygiene.aspx [Accessed 28
Oct. 2016].
Karaaslan, A., Kepenekli Kadayifci, E., Atc, S., Sili, U., Soysal, A., ulha, G., Pekru, Y. and
Bakr, M. (2014). Compliance of Healthcare Workers with Hand Hygiene Practices in
Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Overt Observation. Interdisciplinary
Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, [online] 2014, pp.1-5. Available at:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ipid/2014/306478/ [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Theory18
Karabay, O., Sencan, I., Sahin, I., Alpteker, H., Ozcan, A. and Oksuz, S., 2005. Compliance and
efficacy of hand rubbing during in-hospital practice. Medical principles and practice,
14(5), pp.313-317.
Kretzer, E.K. and Larson, E.L., 1998. Behavioral interventions to improve infection control
practices. American journal of infection control, 26(3), pp.245-253.
Mele, A.R., 2001. Self-deception unmasked. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
NHS Foundation Trust, (2016). HAND HYGIENE POLICY. 1st ed. [ebook] Sheffield: Sheffield
Teaching Hospitals, pp.4-20. Available at:
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.29490!/file/HandHygienePolicy.pdf
NHS UK, (2016). Quality Account Report.. 2nd ed. [ebook] National Health Service, pp.6-78.
Available at:
http://www.nhs.uk/aboutNHSChoices/professionals/healthandcareprofessionals/qualityaccounts/Documents/2013/KCHT-Quality%20Account-12-13.pdf [Accessed 28 Oct.
2016].
Ott, M. and French, R., 2009. Hand hygiene compliance among health care staff and student
nurses in a mental health setting. Issues in mental health nursing, 30(11), pp.702-704.
Ott, M. and French, R., 2009. Hand hygiene compliance among health care staff and student
nurses in a mental health setting. Issues in mental health nursing, 30(11), pp.702-704.
Pyne, E., Physician Attitudes toward Hand Hygiene in the Acute Care Setting; 2012.
Theory19
Shukla, U., Chavali, S. and Menon, V. (2014). Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare
workers in an accredited tertiary care hospital. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine,
[online] 18(10), p.689. Available at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4195200/ [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Sickbert-Bennett, E., DiBiase, L., Willis, T., Wolak, E., Weber, D. and Rutala, W. (2016).
Reduction of Healthcare-Associated Infections by Exceeding High Compliance with
Hand Hygiene Practices. Emerg. Infect. Dis., [online] 22(9), pp.1628-1630. Available at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994356/ [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
Tibballs, J., 1996. Teaching hospital medical staff to handwash. The medical journal of Australia,
164(7), pp.395-398.
WHO Healthcare, (2016). The critical role of infection prevention and control. 1st ed. [ebook]
World Health Organisation, pp.3-26. Available at:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246235/1/WHO-HIS-SDS-2016.10-eng.pdf?
ua=1 [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
WHO HHSF, (2016). Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework. 1st ed. [ebook] World Health
Organisation, pp.1-9. Available at:
http://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/hhsa_framework_October_2010.pdf?ua=1
WHO literature review, (2016). Systematic literature review of automated/electronic systems for
hand hygiene monitoring Preliminary results. 1st ed. [ebook] World Health Organisation,
Theory20
pp.1-3. Available at: http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/automated-hand-hygienemonitoring.pdf?ua=1 [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
WHO Report on the Burden of HCAIs, (2011). Report on the Burden of Endemic Health CareAssociated Infection Worldwide. 1st ed. [ebook] World Health Organisation. Available at:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/80135/1/9789241501507_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
WHO Report, (2016). Summary Report: Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework Survey
2015/2016. 1st ed. [ebook] 1-19: World Health Organisation. Available at:
http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/hand-hygiene-report.pdf [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].
WHO, (2016). A Guide to the Implementation of the WHO Multimodal Hand Hygiene
Improvement Strategy. 1st ed. [ebook] World Health Organisation, pp.4-48. Available at:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70030/1/WHO_IER_PSP_2009.02_eng.pdf
WHO, (2016). WHO | Hand hygiene monitoring and feedback. [online] Who.int. Available at:
http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/monitoring_feedback/en/ [Accessed 28 Oct. 2016].

Explore Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Nursing in Healthcare Setting Using Behavioral Theory

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Explore Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Nursing in Healthcare Setting Using Behavioral Theory

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Explore Hand Hygiene Compliance Among Nursing in Healthcare Setting Using Behavioral

EXPLORE HAND HYGIENE COMPLIANCE AMONG NURSING IN HEALTHCARE

Need for further research

Вам также может понравиться