Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
13
I
.
293
294
PA RT TH R L
C ti A PTE R
1 3
295
.LEARNING GOALS
Afler reading
Apply nationa
duclion and suld on the market in a given time period. GNP, which is the basic measure of
a countrys output studied hy nmcroeconornist, is calculated hy adding up the rnarket
vahie of all expenditures on final output. GNP therefore includes the value of goods Iike
hread sold in a supermarket and texthooks so]d in a bookstore. as welI as the value of serv
ices provided hy stock brokers and plumbers. Because Output Cannot be produced without
the aid of factor inputs, the expenditurcs that rnake UJ) GNP are closely linked to the
employment of labor, capital. and other factors of production.
To clistinguish among the different tvpes of expenditure that make up a countrys GNP.
government economists and statisticians who compile national mcorne accounts divide
(INP among the four possible uses for hich a countrys final output is purchased:
consumplion (the amount consumed by private domestic residents), invesUnen! (the
amouiit put aside by private fitms to build new plant and equiprnent for future produc[ion).
golerinicnt piirehases (the amount used by the government), and the current account bui
once (the amount of net exports of goods and services lo foreigners). The terni ,zational
incoilze accounts, rather than no/tonni output a(count, is used to describe this fourfold
ctassittcation because a countrys income in fact equals its output. Thus. the national
income accounts can he thought of as classifying each transaction that contributes to
national incorne according to the type of expenditure that gives rise to it. Figure 13-1
shows how U.S. GNP was divided among its four components in 2009.1
Why is il useful to divide GNP into consumplion. inestment. governrnent purchases.
and the current account? One rnajor reason is that we cannot hope to understand the cause
of a particular recession or boom ithout knowing how the timin categories of spending
Our detinition ol the current uccount not s1rct1y accurate when country is i net donor or recipient of lireion
gifts. This possibility. along with some tithers. also complicates our dentilcttion of ONI with national incorne.
We describe later in this chapter hos the delinitions ot national neome md the current account Inust be chaned
in such CiISCS.
296
PA
Figure
-i PE E
13-1
BiUions
of dollars
16000
111111)011 prlllIlJ( i
1011)
thC
fOLlI I ofllpoflents
Snurce: (iS.
IIIBCIU
pIIInI1I
shown.
GNP
14000
((
i ooo
Consumption
10000
8000
6000
Government
purchases
4000
2000
Investment
I_I
2000
Clirrent
account
have changed. And withotit sueh an understanding, we cannol recommend a sound policy
response. In adclition, the nationai mcome accotints provide information essentiai for
studying hy some countries are richthat is. have a hih leve! of GNP relative to popu
lation sizewhile some are pooi.
C HAPTE R
1 3
297
ilie paper and ink purchased hy the puhlishing h()use Lo produce the book ai-e no!
separaiely in GNP becanse their contribulion io the aliie of natiunal output is
already included in the hooks price. li is io avoid such deuble counhing that we allow
only
the sale ol finul geods and services lo enter mb the deiinilion of GNP. Sales of intermedi
ate goods, such as H[)f and ink purehased by a puhlisher. aie noi couiited. Notice alse
hat the sale ei a used textbook does noi enier GNP. Qur dehniiion counts only una! goods
and services that aie jmdueed, and a used lextbook does noi qualify: li was counted in
GNP ai the time il was Iirsi sold. Equivalently. the sale of a used texlbook does noi gener
ate i ncome br any ketor ol production.
counied
1. GNP does noi take mio aceount the economie bss due io the tendency of machinery
ami structures te wea out as they are used. This bss, called (Ie/)reL!ati(m, reduces the
income of capita! owners. To calcolate national income over a given period. we musi
therefore subiraci from GNP the depreciation of capita! over the period. GNP less
depreciation is called net nutional pmduct (NNP).
2. A countrys mcome may include gifts from residents of foreign countries, called
unilaie,vl 1v11s/l:v. Examples of unilateral transfers of income are pension
l)aYfllefltS
io retired citizens living abroacl. reparation payrncnts, and foreign aid such as re]ief
funds donated te droughlstricken naiions. For the United States in 2009, the balance
ei such payments amounted io around $130.2 billion. reprcsenting a 0.9 percent of
GNP nei transfer te foreigners. Nei unilaicral transfers are pari of a countrys income
bui are noi pari of its produci, and ihey musi be added te NNP in calculations of
national income.
National income equals GNP less depreciation plus net unilateral transfer. The dilier
ence. betwcen GNP and national income is hy no means an insignilicant amount, bui
macroeconemics has utile te say ahout it, and il ix of little importance br rnacroeconomic
analysis. Therefore, for the purposes of this text, we usually LISC the terms GNP and
nalional income interchangeahly, emphasizing the distinction hetween the two on]y when
li is essentiaL
speaking. go ernmellt staflsiicians relr to what we have cailed national inconie as inul000! divposab
Their ollicial concept of national incorne omits torcign net Ijni1ater1 transhrs. Once again, however,
the
dilterence betw een n donai income and nationai disposabie incoirie is usually iinimportant for
macroeconornie
anaiysis. LniIatenLt trinster ale alternatively referred to assccoiidan Ico,,u pciiIJunt to distinguish
ilien trorn
J)17I7?(Jri jnCoil?t [)CLiIICIIV eUnsiStnL of crossborder wage and investillent
inconie. We wiii ee this tenninology
later w ben .s e study bai;uice o! 1 Yfl flt accouating.
jnCOflIe.
298
PA
P1 TII
PE E
lxchangc
.ites
incuifle dumestie residents eain on wealth they hold in otler eountries less the payiiients
domestie residcnts make to foreign owners of wealth that ix Iocated in the domestic colIIitry.
GDP does not correct. as GNP does. kw the porlion of countnes pmduetion caned out
u.sing serviccs providcd by foieignowned capital and labor. Consider an example: The earn
ins of a Spanish fttctory with British uwners are counted in Spains GDP hut are pan (li
T3iitains GNP. The services Brtish capita! provides in Spain are a service export from Britain.
therefoie they are added to British GDP in calculating British GNP. Ai the sanie time, tu gure
Spains GNP, we must subiraci from its GDP the corresponding service impari lrom Britain.
As a practica! matter. movements in GDP and GNP usual!y do noi ditler greatly. We
wiH ft)cu,s oii GNP in this book, however, because GNP tracks nationa! ineonie more
income
closey tlian GDP does, and national wel tire depends more direct!y un national
than on doniestic produci.
Consumption
The portion of GNP purchased hy private households to fuIfihl curreni tants Is called
ork, and washing machines ali
consuniption. Purchases of movie tickets, food. dental
fai! into this category. Consumption expenditure is the !argest component of GNP in inost
economies. In the United States, for example, the fraction of GNP devoted to consuniption
has fluctuated in a range troni ahout 62 to 70 percent over the past 60 years.
Investment
The pari of output used by private firms to produce future output is called investrncnt.
Investment spendin may be viewed us the portion of GNP used io increase the nations
as
stock ofcapital. Steel and bricks used to build afactory are pari ofinestrnent spending,
pur
Firms
computers.
are services provided by a technician ho helps buiid business
chases of insentories are aiso counted in irivesimeni spending because carrying in entories
is just another way for lirms to transfer output from current tise lo future use.
!nvestment is usual!y more variabie than consumption. In the United States, (gross) invesi
word
menI has Iluctuated between i I and 22 percent of GNP in receni ears. We often use the
hut
estate,
real
or
bonds.
stocks,
of
purchases
households
inltstment to describe individua!
economic
the
word
with
the
of
rneaning
you si-iouid be careful noi to confuse this everyday
you are
detnition of investment as a pari of GNP. When you buy a share of Microsoft stock,
GNP.
in
up
buyirig neithcr a good nor a service, so your purchase dues noi show
CH A PTE R
1 3
NaiioniI
Inconie
299
Government Purchases
and services puichased hy federai, siate, or locai governments are ciasslied as
the nationai income accounts. ncluded in governmenl purchases
are federal miiimry spending. government suppori of cancer rcsearch,
and govemmeni
funds speni on highway repair and education. Government purchases include investment as
weil as consumption purchases. Govemmetu transftr paymcnts such as sociai security and
unemploymentbenefits do not requhle the recipient io give the government miv goods or serv
ces in return. Thus. transfer payments are noi inciuded in governmeni iiaS.
Government purchases currentiv tale up about 20 percent ol U.S. GNP, and ihis share has
noi changed much since the late I 950s. (The corresponding figure fr 1959, for example, was
arouncl 20 percenL) In 1929, however, government purchases accounted lor oniy 8.5 perceni
of U.S. GNP.
Afly goods
government purehascs in
C + I + G.
We derived the nationai income identiiv for a ciosed economy by assuming that ali
output Is consurned or invested by the counirys citizens or ptirchased by its government.
When foreign trade ix possible, however. SOme Output S purchased by foreigners whiie
some domestie spending goes to purchase goods and services produced ahroad. The GNP
identity for open economies shows how the national income a country earns by selling its
goods and sen ices ix divicled hetween saies io domestic residents and saies to foreign
residents.
Since residents of an open economy may spend some of their incone on imports, that
is, goods and services purchased from ahroad, only the portion of their spending that ix noi
devoted to imports is part of domestie GNR The value of imports, denoted by IM. musi be
suhtracted from totai domestic spending, C + i + G. io Ind the portion of domestic
spending that generates domestic national income. Imports from abroaci add to foreign
countries GNPs but do noi add directiy io dornestic GNP.
Similariy. the goods and services sold to foreigners make up a countrys exports.
Exports. denoted by EX, are the amount foreign residents purchases add io the natioiiai
income of the doinestic econorny.
The nationai income of an open economy Is iherefore the sum of dorncsiic and foreign
expenditurcs on the goods and services produced by domestic factors of production. Thus.
the national income identity for an open economy is
Y=C+I+G+EXIM.
113-1)
30()
PA
-r
TH REE
TABLE
100
75
55 hushe!s of whtii
(05 htih1
per
10
I-
25
a kn )
X (40
Irnports
b
20
bus of milk ).
portion nt each years rop as seed tor the iext years planting. There is also a govern
ment that appropriates part of the crop Io tceci the Agrarian army. Agrarias total annual
crop is 100 bushels of wheat. Agraria can import milk from the rest of the world in
exchange [ci cxports o[ wheat. We cannot draw up the Agrarian nationai income
accounts without knowing the price ol miik in terrns of wheat because all the compo
nents in the GNP identity (13I) must be rneasured in the same unis. If we assume the
price o1 milk is 0.5 hushel of wheat per gallon. and thai at this price, Agrarians ant to
consume 40 gallons oF miik, then Agrarias imports are equal in value to 20 bushels
of wheat.
In Table 13-I we sec that Agrarias total output is 100 hushels of wheat. Consuinption
is dvided betwcen wheat and milk, with 55 hushels of wheat ancl 40 gallons of milk (equal
in value to 20 hushels ot wheat) consumed over the year. The value of consumption in
terms of wheat is 55 + (0.5 X 40) = 55 + 20 = 75.
The 100 bushels of wheat produced hy Agraria are used as follows: 55 are consumed hy
domestic residents, 25 are invested. IO an purchaseci hy the goveniment, ancl 10 are exported
ahroad. National ineome (Y = 100) equals dornestic spending (C + I + G = 110) plus
exports (EX
20).
EX
IM.
When a countrys imports exceed its exports, we say the country has a current account
3
deficit. A country has a rurrent accounl siirplus when its exports exceed its irnports.
is important
account
current
the
why
reason
one
shows
The GNP identity, equation (13-1),
expenditures
total
gives
of(13-1)
side
in iniernational rnacroeconornics. Since the right-hand
on dornestic output, changes in the current account can be associated with changes in output
CIIAPTER
301
ioreigners than il seils lo them and musi somchow finance this curieni aecounl
How does il pay for additionai imports once il has speiit its exporl earnings? Siiice
the country as a whoic can impuri more thaii it expoits only il il caii horrow the dilThrencc
(mm ftweiencrs, a country with a curreni account deficit musi be increasing its nel
ireign
dehts hy the amount of the deficit. This is currentiy the position of the United
States.
which has a signifcant curreni account deficit (and horrowed a sum equal
to roughiy
3 perceni of its GNP in 2009).
Similarly, a countrv vitIi a curreni account surpius Is earning niore (mm its exports
lhail it spends Ofi imports. This country hnances the current account deficit of its trading
partners by iending io them. The foreign wealth of a surplus country rises because foreigo
ers pay for any inlports not covered by their exports by issuing lOUs that
they wiIi eventu
liy h iv_ to I Ldccm Thc pi e(.eding ie isoning shows th 11 a ( aunhi
(1(1 Un! ( ( oifnt
balaiu t quals 1/IL ha,uc ai i1 IILI /01CM,,? o ca/I/i
We li we defiiid the cwient account as the dittulcncL bctween cxpoits md Imports
Equ ition (I 3 1) s ys th lt the LUI icnt accOunt is i.o equal to thL diii LIncL_
bLtwcLn
il ition il incom md domestic icsidents total spendtng C + I + 6
ff0111
deficit.
(C + I + G)
(A
li Is only by borrowing abroad that a country can Ilave a current account deficit and use
more output ihan it is currenhly producing. li ii uses less than iis output. li
has a curreni
Figure 13-2 gives a vivid iUustration of how a siring of curreni account defcits cari add
up to a large loreien debi. The figure piots the U.S. current account halancc since the
late
1970s along v ith a measure of the nations stock of net foreign wealth. As you cari sec, the
United States had accumulated substantial foreign wealth by the early 1980s. when sus
a
mmcd current account deficit of proportions unprecedented in the 2Oth century opened
up.
In 1987, the countr becarne a net debior io foreigners for the first time since World War I.
That foreign debt has continued to grow, and ai the end of 2009, it siood at just below
20 percent of GNP.
4
A
tternativelv a counmr outd fimince a cuiTent iceount clelictm by usin previousv aceumulated foreign
weath
Io ay (or nwOrt. fhis country would be runnins down its neI trein svsalth. v lodi is ihe same is
ru noie sip
its net toreign dehts.
Our diseussion bere is Ignoring the possibility tua? a country receives gifis of toregn assets (or gives
such
ilts). such as whcn one country agrees Io torgive another.s debts. As v. e will diseuss below. such asset
transkrs
(unlike transters of Curreflt income) are nor pai? 01 the current accciunl. but they rionetheless do aflecr
nel foreign
wealth. The
3 ore rccordc-d in the capita? accouni o! the balance of pa inent-.
The surn t = C + I + G is often called domestie absorprian in the literature on international rnacroecohio
incs.
Usin this terminology. we con descrihe the curreni account surplus as the difference hetweeri income awi
ahsorp
11011. Y
A.
302
PART TH REE
CLirrenI account,
net Ioreign wealth (biflions ol dotlars)
400
200
o
200
Current account
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
3600
2004 2006 2008
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
Figure 13-2
Th U.S. Ciricnt A coLInt and Nt Freign VeaIth losition, I
wealth until, by the
A string of current account defic,ts start ing in the i J80s reduced Americas net foreign
deht.
foreigo
net
uIrmntiaI
a
early 2lst century, the (ountrv had
Source: U.S. Deparimeni
01 (umnwr C,
iii (tJ
mosi
Simple as it is, the GNP identity has rnany illuminating inIpiicaiions. To explain the
portion
the
i.
thai
imporItnt of these irnplications, we define the concept of national saving,
or governrnent purchases. G.c
of output. Y, that is noi devoted to household COflSUmptiOH, C,
closed
in a closed econoinv, IIOt(vna/ .vating alwavs quaIs imestinent. This tefls us that the
capital.
new
accurnulating
by
only
wealth
ils
increase
economy as a who]e cm
Let 5 stand for national saving. Our defnition of 5 iells us that
5
G.
C HAPTE R
Siice
liii
(
1 3
NaiionuI inconie
Accouiiling
303
(;. t)L)1
i.
and national saving mUSI cquii iiCs1mCfli ii a closed CCOflOmy. Whereas iii a c!osed econ
oiiiy, savtng and investineni illusi always be equa!, 1l all P CCOilOlly they can differ.
Reineinbeiing t[iai national saving, S. equais Y
C
6 ancl hat CA = LX
IM. we
can rewrite the GN P ideni ity (13 I) as
I + CA.
TIie equation highlighis an important difference hetween open and cIosed cCoflomies:
An open economy can save either hy bui!ding up its capita! stock or hy acquiring !oreign
weaiih. bui a closed economv can save on!y by buiiding up its capitai stock.
Un!ike a c!oscd economy. an open economy with pro!itab!e invesimeni opportumties does
noi bave io increase iIs saving in order lo expioit iheni. The preceding expression shows that it
5 possibie simuftaneousiy io raise investment and foreign bolToWing withotit changing sav
ing. For cxampie. if New Zeaand decides Io huild a new hydroekctric piani, il can import the
naleria!s it needs from the Unitec! States and borrow American funds to pay for them. This
transaclion raiscs New Zeaiands domestic investmeni because the imported materiaIs
contribute to expanding the countrys capital stock. The transaction aiso raises New Zeaiands
cunent account deficit by an amount equa! to the increase in investment. New Zealands sav
ing does noi have Lo change. even though invesimeni rises. For this to be possibie, howevei,
U.S. residents musi be wiiling to save more so that the resources needed to buiid the piani are
freed for New Zealands tise. The resuli is another exampie of intertemporai trade. in which
New Zea!and imports present consumption (when it borrows from the United States aild
exports future consumption (when it pays off the loan).
Because one countrys savings can be horrowed hy a second country iii order to
increase the second counirys stock of capital, a countrys current account suipius is often
referred to as ils nel foreigii iiive.vt,,ien!. Of course, when one country iends to another to
finance investment, pari of the income geiierated by the investrnent in future years musi be
used io pay hack the iendei Domesiic investment and foreign investment are two different
ways in which a country can use currcnt savings lo increase its future income.
py1neni.
C.
The terni
;oernh1u ni
304
(Jmvi-nnunt vaiing is
Microcco,ionics
G.
ilie two types ol saving we have deiined, I)riIte ami government. add up to nalional
C
G. Then
saving. To sec why, recai! the delinition of national saving, S, as Y
(Y
T C) + (T
G)
8 +
sg
the dehni ions of private and government saviflg io rewrite the nationai
inCome identity in a forni that is useltil ir analyzing the etiects ol government saving
I + CA,
decisions Uil OCi eCOilOillieS. Because 5 = 8 + S
\Ve can
Lise
I + CA
I + CA
(T
I + CA + (G
G)
T).
U3-2
Equation (132) reiates private saving Lo doniestic iflvestment. the current account sur
pius, aiid government saving. To interpret equation (13-2). ve detine the governnient
T. that is, as government saving preceded by a mjnus sign. The
budget deficit as G
measures the extent to which the gOVerilnleflt is horrowing to
delicit
budget
government
.
linance its expenditures Equation (132) then states that a coimtrys pi-ivate saving can take
three forins: investment in domcstic capital (i). purchases of wealth from foreigners (CA),
T). The usefulness
and purchases ol the domestic governments newiy issueci debt (G
of equation (13-2) is illustrated by the following Case Study.
Case Study
Government Deficit Reduction May Not Increase the Current Account Surplus
I 1k linkage ;mlong ihe current ai-colinI haiance. investment, and private and government
tr thinking about the results of economic
saving given by equation (13-2) iS eT i
policies and evenis. ( )iir prL-Ll!e1n ,,hot,i such outcomes cannot possibly be correct unless
the current account, investment, and saving rates are assumed to adjust in line with (13-2).
Becausethat equation is an jdentii-,, huvesei, ami is not based on any theory ofeconomic
behavior, we cannot forecast the re uil of policies without some mode! of the economy.
Equation (13-2) is an identity because it must be included in any va!id economic mode!,
but there are any ,i,mhe of tiiodels consistent with identity (13-2).
A good example of how hard it can be io forecast policies effects comes from think
ing about the effects of govemment deflcits on the current account. During the adminis
tration ofPresident Ronald Reagan in the early 1980s, he United States slashed taxes and
raised some government expenditures. which generated both a big government deficit and
a sharply increased current account deficit. Those events gave rise to the argument that
the government and the current account deficits were twin deficits both generated pri
marily by the Reagan policies. If you rewrite identity (13-2) in the form
CA
(G
T),
eqilauion
(13-2)
irnpiy 5
I + (G
Tj.
C HA PT E P
1 3
iccount
305
you can sec how ihat onicoitie could have oecurred. If the govemmeni ilehcit nses
i oes up) and private saving and Incstmcnt dont chaiigc mueh. the cuneni
account surplus must ItII hy wuglily the sale amount as the increae i i the tiscal
dehcii. In the United States hetwe.en 981 and 1945. the gwernnient deticii IIcI
by a bit more than 2 Irm of GNP, whileY
I feli by abotii halt a IJeftei Il ol GNF
so the curreni account feil 1mm an approxiniaieI haianccd poSilioli io ahoui 3 perceni
of (iNP. (The variable. in identity (I 3-2) are expresseil a. peiceni
ol ( NP br easy
comparisOn.) Thus. the twin deficits prec1ictio is noi 100 fai off the ,nark.
The twin deteits thenry can Iead ns seriously aslray. however. when change. in gov
ernmeiit deficits lead to bigger changes in private saving and investmeni hehavior. A good
example ol these effects comes from Furopean conntries eliorts io cui their gmernment
budget delicits prior to the Iaunch of their new common currencv, the euro. in Janiuuv
1999. As ve vilI discuss in Chapter 20. the Furopean Union (FU) had agreed that no
member euuntry with a large government delcit would Le allowed ti) adopi the h\\ cur
rency along with the initial wave ol euro zone menbers. As 1999 approached. ihereiore.
FU goVemmerlis made trantic eltoils to cuI govei-nment spending and raise ta\es.
Under the twin delicits theor we ould have
ivJ the F(
current i e inc
surplus io i licrease sharply as a iesuI i ol 11k iicaI change. A. the tahle heI v. shows.
however. nothing of the sori acluali> hap
)ene(1. For the FU as a whole. governinent
1
delcits leil hy ahoui 1.5 peruenl ed output. yet the uurieiit account
plu ieinaiiied
ah )Lit the same
The table teveals the main reasiin the ctirreiil su uni didnt chaice much: a i
talI in the private saving rate. whiuh declincd h ahout 4 perceni of uipu1. alinost as
nnicli a. the increase in e
;n sI5 sa inc IIi\ estIieni rose .lichti\ at the same time.)
li hi case, the heha ior ol
i\ de savers us1 abotii nentralized tovernmenis efforts
(o iii.
li
national saving!
\plan.I1I()i ()ne
CA
0.6
1.0
1.5
1.0
02
1
S
259
24.6
23.4
226
21.8
I
19.9
19.3
19.4
20.0
20.8
Source: Organization for Lconornc Cooperalion and Devcloprnent. OECD Eronwniu Ouilook 68
(Decenber 2000). annex tihte 27, 30, and 52 ( ith investment caicutated a. the residuni).
GT
5.4
4.3
2.5
1.6
0.8
306
PART TH REE
Exchangc Ritcs
aiid
Opcii-Economy Macroccononiics
lie L,S. oven1nment is in time process of changimcg its balance of payments presentation tu conform to prevail
9
T
ing nternatLona1 standards. o ocir discusson io ihis chapwr dctfers in some respeCis lioni thct in prior ditions o)
foilow the ncethodology dcscrihed hy Krist L. Howtl1 and Roberi E. Yuskasae. Modernizine
this book.
mcd Enhcincin Blis internationai Economie Accounts: Receiit Piogress and Future Directcons. Suncv of
Currcnt bzumevs (May 20101. pp. 020. As of tliis riting time U.S. has not completed a fuji iransilcon io the new
systeccc. but it cc expecwd to do so in er the eari3 20! Os
C HAPTE R 1 3
307
payment troni the United Statcs to Iregners. Correspondingly. a LJ.S. sale of aSscts
lo Ioreigners enters the U .S. financiai accounl as a credt. The differcice between
a
countrys purchases md sales of flreign assets is caiicd itsfiiui,mtiul (l(c(nInI bairnue.
or its ne! finanerni 1/mis.
3. Certain other activities resuliing in transfers ol wealih hetween countries are rccorded
in the capital accoiint. These !nlernational assel movements---which are generali)
very smnail for the Unitcd Statesdiffer (mm those rccorded in the
(mancia! aCcOUnt.
For the iliosi pari they rcsult lrom nonmarket aclivil cs or represent the acquisilion
or
disposai of nonproduced, nonhnancial, and possibly intangible assets (such as copy
rights and trademarks). For ex.mple, if the U.S. government forgives $1 billion in debi
owed to il by the goernment ol Pakistan, U.S. weaith dcciines hy $1 hiilion and
a
$ i bili ion dehit is recorded in the U.S. capitai accoont.
You wiii ind the compiexities of the balance of payments accounts less confusing if
you keep in mmd the foilowing simpie rule of dotihleeniry bookkeeping: Eierv iliter
naiio,iaI transaetioil auto,naticallv en(ers the ba/urne
0/ JNIVInefltS titicC, once (IS a
credii and once as a debir. This principie nt baiance of paynlents accounting holds
true
because every transaction has two sides: TI you huy something from a foreigner,
you
must pay him in some way. and the ftreigner must then soincho spend or store your
payment.
1. Imagine you buy an inkjet fax machine from the italian company Olivetti and pay for
your purchase with a $J,000 check. Your payment Io huy a good (the hix machine)
from a foreign resident entcrs the U.S. culTcnt account as a debit. But where is the off
setting balance of payments credii? Olivettis U.S. salesperson musi do something
with your checkiets say he deposits it in Oiivettis account at Citibank in New York.
In this case. Olivetti has purchased. and Citibank has solci. a U.S. asseta bank
deposit worth $1 .000and the transaction shows UI) US a SI ,000 credit in the U.S.
financial account. The transaction creates the foilowing two offsetting bookkeeping
entries in the U.S. balance ofpayments:
Credit
Fax machine purchasc (Currcnt account.
Sale of hank deposit hy Citibank
(Financial account.
Debit
SI,OO()
S1,000
2. As another example. suppose that during your traeIs in France, you pay $20() for
a
fine dinner at the Restaurant de IEscargot dOr. Lacking cash, you piace the charge on
your Visa ci-edit card. Your payrnent. which is a tourist expenditure. wiii be counted as
a service import lor the United States, and therefore as a current account debit. Where
is the offsetting credit? Your signature on the Visa slip entities the restaurant to receive
S200 (actually, its local currency equivaient) from First Card, the company that issued
your Visa card. It is therelre an asset, a clairn on a future payment from First Card.
So shen you pii lor your meal abroad with your credit card. you are selling an asset
308
PAPT TH REE
France and gcnelaling a $20() credit in the US. linancial account. The pattern oF
ollsetting dehiis and ciedits in this case is:
1(.)
Debil
(redit
$200
$200
of stock
3. Imagine next thai your Uncle Sid irom Los Angeles huys a nev ly issued share
stockbroker,
his
in the U.K. oil giant British Petroleum (BP). He places his order with
mar
Go-finBroke, Inc., paving $95 with a check drawn un his GoForBroke rnoney
ket acconni. BP, in turn, clepnsits the $95 Sid has paid mio its own U.S. hank account
in
ai Second Bank of Chicago. Uncie Sids acquisilion of the stock creaies a $95 dehit
BP).
resident,
toreign
a
rroni
asset
an
purchased
the LJ.S. linancial account (he has
whiie BPs $95 deposit ai its Chicago hank ix the offsetting financial account credit
bal
(BP has expanded its U.S. assei hoidings), The mirwrimage effecis un the U.S.
ance of payments therefore both appear in the financial account:
Credit
Uncie Sids urchase oCa share of BP
(Financial accon nt, U .S. OSSeI PLI rchasc)
BPs deposii of Uncle Sids payment ai Sccond Bank of Chicago
(Financiai account. U.S. assct sale)
Dehit
$95
$95
when
4. Finally, lets consider how the U.S. balance of payments accounts are affected
debi
in
U.S. hanks forgive (that Is, announce that they vill simply forgei about) $5.000
case, the
owed io them hy the government of the imaginary country of Bygonia. In this
as
a
$5.000
appears
which
Bygonia,
to
transfer
capital
United States makes a $5.000
in
account,
financial
the
in
is
credii
associated
The
debit entry in the capital account.
of
acquisition
negative
(a
ahroad
held
assets
the form of a $5,00() reduction in V.S.
foreign assets. and therefore a balance of payments credit):
Credit
U.S. banks debt forgivcncss
(Capita! accouni, U.S. iransfcr payment)
Reduclion in banks claims on Bygonia
(Financial acconni, U.S. assct sale)
Debit
55.000
$5.000
These examples show that rnany circumstances can alfect the way a transaction
certainty
generates iis offsetting balance ofpayments eniry. We can never predict wiih
that it
sure
be
can
where the (hp side oCa particular transaction will show up. but we
will show up sornewhere.
C HAPTER 1 3
309
the cnr
Oiher asscts
(6) Nel U.S. incurrence of liabilities, excluding (mancia] deriv-atives
Ofwhich:
Official rcscrve asset.s
Oiher assets
140.5
52.3
88.2
305.7
450.0
--144.3
50.8
216.0
ditTr
US.
oundn!.
162.5
release. Totats rnay
.3 10
PA RT TH PE L
cate
The halance of PaYmentS accoti[its divide exports ami imports mb three liner
second
The
ndise.
mercha
s
of
import
or
s
export
is,
eories. The lirsi is goods trade, ihat
kw legai assistance, tourists expcndi
ealegory..wni(c.s. includes ilems such as payments
alionai
tures. ami shipping lees. The linal cateory. ln(VflC. is made up mostly ol mntern
mn
Operat
hrnis
()Wned
tically
interesi ami dividend payments ami the earnins ol donies
$5.
of
nt
nd
payme
abroad. If you nwn a share of a Cierman Iirms slnck ami receive a divide
Wages
of
$5.
bhat payment shows up in the accounts asa U.S. investment income receipt
t.
accoun
the
mncome
enter
also
cari
that workers carri ahroad
e that income
We include income ori ftreign investments in the current accouni becaus
idea. as we
really is compefl.sation tor the serikcs provided by foreign investinents. This
ralion
Corpo
U.S.
a
When
GDP.
and
n
GNP
saw earlier, is hehmnd the distinction hetwee
tes
are
genera
piani.
the
s
service
tve
htnlds a piani in Canada, br instance. the produc
prouits
to
the
value
in
a
viewed as a service export bmm the Uniied States io Canad equal
include these
the piani yields br its American owner. To be consisteni, we musi be sure to
definition of GNP
prolits in American GNP and noi in Canadian GNP. Rcmemhcr, the
it does iiot
refers io goods and serviccs generaied by a countrys laciors ol produclion, bui
owns them.
specify ihat those factors must work within the horders of the country that
onai
type of inter
adduti
e
one
includ
musi
we
t.
Before calculating the current accoun
relationship
ssing
the
discrL
In
now.
tintil
national transacilon that we have largely mgnored
ies as
countr
n
rs
hctwee
transfe
ral
betwcen GNP and national income, ve detined unilate
good.
any
of
se
purcha
the
io
ond
internationa] gi fts. ihat is, payments that do noi corresp
t as
t
accoun
curren
the
of
service, or asset. Nei. unilateral transfers are considered I,art
if
exactiy
holds
C + I + G + CA
vell as a pari of national inconie. and the identuty )
rs
transfe
ral
Y is interprete.d as GNP plus nei. transfers. In 2009, the U.S. balance of unilate
was $124.9hiliion.
$2.4 12.5
The table shows a 2009 current account balance of $2,1 59.0 billion
that cur
means
sign
e
negativ
.
The
deficit
.
a
billion $ 124.9 billion = $378.4 billion
ts nsed
residen
U.S.
ihat
s
and
rcceipt
t
rent paymcnts io foreigners exceeded curren
for
paid
were
tioris
transac
t
t
more output than they produced. Since these curren accoun
net
a
hy
offset
be
musi
entry
in sonie wav. ve know that this $378.4 billion net debit
nts.
payme
of
e
balanc
the
in
ere
elsewh
credit
$378.4 billion
CH APTER
1 3
31 1
3I 2
PA RT
H REE
Macroccononiics
accoiint is the musi iikely ciilpii(. since il iS nokwiuIISIy (lillicLilI tu keep track ol the Cunpli
cated financiai trades hetween residents ol diUerent countries. i3tit we cann()t conclude that
t
nei linanciai flows were $1 (-2.5 bili bn lower ihin iecurded, hecause the cuneni accoun Is
also highly suspeci. Balance ol iirens accountants cunsidei inerchandise trade data rela
iively reliable. hut data 01) services aie noi Service transaclions such as sales of tinancial
advice and computer pmgramming assistance may escape deteclion. Accurate measurement
of international interest and dividend receipts is paiticularly difliculi.
.
Stabilization Fund
supply. how
operations of such agencies usualiy have no noticeable impaci on the money
as if the
ding)
misiea
too
noi
is
it
(when
ng
ever. ve will simplify our discussion by speaki
nes.
centrai bank alone holds foreign reserves and interve
s in its
When a centrai bank purchases or sclls a foreign asset, the transaclion appear
private
a
by
out
carried
counlrys i nancial accountjust as if the same transaction had been
s
doliar
acquire
ciiizen. A transaction in which the centrai hank ofiapan (the Bank of Japan)
and
assets might occur as foiiows: A U.S. auto dealer imports a Nissan sedan from Japan
the money
pays the auto company with a check for 520.000. Nissan does noi want lo imest
Japanese
Nissan
give
io
willing
is
Japan
of
Bank
the
in doilar assets, bui iL so happens that
rise
reseres
tional
interna
s
Japan
of
Bank
The
money in exchange tor the $20.000 check.
of
pari
s
are
reserve
doliar
s
Japan
of
by 520,000 as a resuit of the deal. Because the Bank
tion
transac
This
0.
$20,00
total Japanese assets held in the United States, the latter rise by
of the
therefore resuits in a $20.000 credii in the U.S. financial account, the other side
10
$20.000 debit in the U.S. current account due to the import of the car.
tions involving the
transac
reserve
official
of
on
directi
and
size
the
Table 13-2 shows
s heid by
United States in 2009. U.S. oflciai reserve assetsthat Is. internationa] reserve
billion
sed
$450.0
purcha
banks
central
n
.
Foreig
billion
the Federal Reserve--rose by $52.3
toreign
e
in
increas
the
less
s
i
reserve
olficia
U.S.
e
to add to their reserves. The nei increas in
the same Se(UenCc of actions causes a S20.000
test vour undertandini see f VOU can expiain why
T
0
in 115 net tinanciai floss.
inciease
a
and
S20,000
account
currelit
in
Jap.ins
iiiprcn emcnt
C HAPTL R
1 3
NaIion.,I
Iliconie
IcCflLII1Liflg
Of
Panicnts
31 3
the L.Jnited SLites is the level o nel central hank financial fiows.
which sinod ai $52.3
$15ft() hii lion = $397.7 billion in 2009.
Y0LI can think ol tliis
$397.7 billiun nei central hank linancial llow as measuring the
degree (o which Ilmnetary aiithorities in the United Statcs and ahioad joined with other
leiiders tu cover the U.S. cuiient account deficit. In the exampic above. the Bank of Japan.
1w acquiring a $20.000 li .S. hank deposil indirectiy finances an American import of a
$20,00() Japanese car. The levei of nel central hank linanciai lows Is called the official
sefllements balance or (in iess frmal usage) the balance of payrnents. This balanee is
the siim of the currcnt account and capital account balances, iess the nonreserve portion of
the hnanciai account baiance. and il indicaies the payments gap that olhcial reserve trans
actions need to cover. Thus the U.S. balance of payments in 2009 was $397.7 billion.
The balance ol Iayments played an important historical role as a ireasure of diseqiiilih
niim in international payments. and for many countries it stili plays this role. A negative
balance of paymcnts (a deficit) may signai a crisis, for it means that a country is running
down its internationai reserve as.sets or incurring dehis to forcign monetary authorities. lf a
country faces the risk ot being suddenly cut off from foreign ioans, it wiI] want to rnainain
a war chest of internationai reservcs as a precaution. Deveioping countrie.s, in particular,
are in this position (sec Chapler 22).
Like any summary measure, however, the baiance of paymenls must be interprcted with
caution. Tu return to our running example. the Bank ol Japans decision to expand its U.S.
bank deposit hoidings by $20.000 swells the measured U.S. baiaice of payments deficit by
the same amount Suppose the Bank of Japan instead places its $20.000 with Barclays
Bank in London. which in turn deposils the money with Citibank in New York. The United
States incurs aii extra $20.000 in liahilities to prilate Foreigners in this case. and the U.S.
baiance of payments deficit does not rise. But this irnprovement in the baiance of pay
ments is of utIle economic importance: lt rnakes no real diIerence lo the United States
whether it horrows the Bank of Japans money directly or through a London hank.
()IIICIaI reserve elaims m
Case Study
The Assets and Liabilities of the Worlds Biggest Debtor
We saw earlierthat the current account balance measures the flow of new net claims on
treign veaith ihat a counuy auuuircs hy exporting more goods and services than it im
ports. Ihis flow is not, lioweser. the only important factor that causes a countrys net
fea
th to change. In addition, changes in the market price of wealth previously
acquired can alter a countrys net foreign wealth. When Japans stock market Iost titree
quarters of its va]ue over the 1 990s, for example, American and Luropean owners of
Japanese shares saw the value of their claims on Japan plummel, and Japans nel
foreign wealth increased as a result. Exchange rate changes have a similar effect. When
the dollar depreciates against foreign currencies, for exantple, foreigners who hold do!
lar assets see their wealth fali when measured in their home currencies.
The Bureau of Economie Analysis (BEA) of the U.S. Departrnent of Commerce,
which oversees the vast job of data collection behind the U.S. national income and bal
ance of payments statistics, reports annual estimates of the net international investment
position of the United Statesthe countrys foreign assets less its foreign liabilities.
Because asset price and exchange rate changes alter the dollar values of foreign assets
and Iiabilities alike, the BEA must adjust the values of existing claims to reflect such
capita! gains and Iosses in order Lo estimate U.S. net foreign wealth. These estimates
3 14
PART TH PE E
show th t the end ol 2OO). the t niied St.tlcs hB_l a iIcatn neL loreigi eaILh poStH)n
I i r g reat e i ha n that il a ny oi her eou n i iv.
UnLII I9)I, toreien di i iflVeti1ici1tS nch aS toreigii laCtL)rieS owned hy I_IS. COi1)OflL
Liois vcie a1tied al their histoiical. Ihat
oiieiiiai, iurc1itse prwes. Now the I3EA uses
two rliflereiit Ireth(xis lo plaee curient valiies on torcien direct inwstments: the (Ifrr(nt (o,t
niethoil. whieh alues (biLel investincnts ti ihe CUSI of buying them iodav. and the iiiarkd
ai \\ liteli the III\ Lstmenis eotild he sold.
ta/tu method, vhich i nei to measure the
litese methocis ean Iead tu diflereni valuations because. the cost ol re)acing a partidul.ir
direct iivestment aud i lie price il would cuinmand if uId on the mai ket mav be hard to
Ineasure. (Ihe net hweien wealth data eiaphed in Figure 132 ai current eust estimates.
Table I 33 reprnditces the B[iAs account ol how it imide iK valuation adjustmcins
Lo fnd the U.S. net loreign position al the end of 2OO). This headline estimate values
TABLE 13-3
LN$IIOU (.4)
,WdIL.
4d bmeIv.w
i qtHIII,m bMI
.4 .,,-
W4
r.d b.g.. ..
1l4
b 44
I44
k .44J,l r
...* ..
b44.4
p.e 149
Attui
4d4RLt 15 r..y .t
I
ldI apIIWLdI t44q4 ta.a t4111 pLttULt I* i_dU..IL. SI
aSI IdOt frL
.aa.aa 41 a*paM AmwaA*qIIIc.a4.Ama acLdmap.d
I flUSI b.q
I4141y.d.ILtDIALI oa
a.Ii.i.S
Sc.q
1 I lalI
dttto Stat ad
b54 ISa.. i.,d, .41 aoAdmrtpIII
*taD; 414154141
4
414 a.D 4141441
a..,.., o eLtal. tt
1,,,.,, taifle va., De .41.41441) arn Fan SAD 0 *41 41 *4450,
411.41.41410 ,flm.a.o,4i.1
k410 ,,*t,,
444*410 L,.4114141 (Vt tali 51
O (ELda tI
USAtI 41 45(0104 411(41.11 .aqn 041 lSOA
SI... fl
Curreni
HAPTE P 1 3
the
BJkuIICC Of
1iyiiicnts
315
direci incstnky)ts a! current cosi. SiarlinL: wiih its csiinate o 2()08 ud !orctn
weaiti
$34.)3.9 billion ai curieni cosO. the 131A (eoliim u) added
n
the aflu)unt of the 2009
i.J.S. neI financial flow o!
$216 bilhontecall the figure repoited iii flible IS 2.
Then the REA adjustcd the vaiues ot pre\1ously heid assets and Iiahilities for
variuus
changes in thcir dollar prices (columns b, e, and (i i. As a result of these
valuation
ehanges, U.S. nel toreign weaith teli hy an am unt inuch smailer than the
$2 16 billion
in ness nei borrowing fiom foreigners in taci. li .S. nel h)reign eaIih actuai
y rose, as
shown in Figure 132! Based oti the curreni cost rnethod br valuing direct
investments.
the BEAs 2009 estimate of U.S. neL foreign wealth was
737 billion.
,
2
b
8
.
This debt is larger than the total fregn debt owed by all the Centrai and
Easterii
Furopean uountries, whieh was about $1.101) hillion in 2009. To put these fgures
in per
spective, however, it is importani io realize that the U.S. nei [oreign debt amoun
ied tu just
under 20 percenl of its GDP. while the foreign liahility of I-Iungarv. Poland.
Romania, ami
the other Centrai and Easterui European dehtors was neariy 70 percent o! their
col lecti e
GDP! liitis, the U.S. exiernal tlehi represenls a nudi lower doniestic mcorne dratii.
Changes in exchange rates anci secunties priccs have the potential to change the
U.S.
net boreign debi sharply. howeer. because the tv.s toieign aseIs
and 1iahiliiie o! the
L.Jnited Sriws have hecoiue su) lirge in receni veai. Figure I 33 illusirates this tuleul
di
le
trend. In l)76. U.S. foreign assets stood ai only 25 pereent o! (IS. (1)P
and iiahilities
ai 16 percent (making the Unuted States a net torcign creditor in the anionni o! roughl
v
rercnt ot its (ii)P). In 2009. however. he countr s fiein ;uu amuuinied tu 129
perceni o! (i)P ami i iiahililics tu I 4 perceni. Flie iiemenduus
growth iii i1uee
Assets, iuabiiities
(ratio fo GDP)
1.6
1.4
1.2
i
::
:;
//
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
2002 2004 2006 2008
Figure 13-3
316
PART E [IREE
s ol itllI i leet. the ripid glk)hali/atiOii ul iii tnciil in;iikcts in the Irne 201h
sto
k
1
I
ceiitur. a phen(inhen()n se s iii isuus $uither in (1
of ih n,ie,iittide anplily the e11eet ol exeJidngc
Ihiuk tI)uLLt ho iea1th 1
L.S loicien issets are denoininated j
rate cianies, 11owe\LLr. Sui mse thai 70 rercIt ol
taICd in dollars
forcigo curi lcies. bui. Ilial iii US. iiabililics tu hueiiners are (II)iiil
w-.
aiuurid 14.4
(I)P
L
2009
.S.
eaiise
I
r
niinihe
correci
).
(thcsc are proimiteI the
ed but
unchan
hi)ities
li
U.S.
leave
souIcI
dullar
the
trilliun. a 1(1 percent depreciation ol
1.21.)
ol
percent
9.()
=
X
X
0.7
0.
)
hy
woiild inerease US. assets (ineasu,ed in doliars
t
curren
the
U.S.
times
v
3.5
inatel
GDP. or abotii S 1.3 trillion. This miinher Is approx
stock
and
r;ite.
ee
icnts in exelan
account deficit ol 2009! liideed. due tu sharp muven
way hets ecu 2007 and 2008 ancl
this
in
hillion
IO
$8(
iibout
y
lost
econom
the
(iS.
plices,
Ihe correspon
zained a compaithIe amount hctween 2{)0 aiid 2009 (sec Figure I 32).
been
din redistribution of wealth between lc eiuner and the United Stales would have
mueh smaller haek i a 1976.
ies eurrent
I)nes this pussihilitv inean that polic iLiIa_l .hOUI(I Igru ae their countr
ps ol nei
huildu
large
prevent
Io
values
cy
accountsand insiead try tu inanipulate curren
chap
nc\i
the
sec
in
e.
sull
we
heeaus
as
liewn deht2 I Iii s ould be a periluus strategv
hehavior.
panI
pwtici
tei. expectaflons ui tuture esehange is are central to market
h exuhange
Syslemaic governrnent Luca pt tu reduce lurcign investors wcalth throug
tlius
cv
rate changes s oiild sharplv reduce I ieiiei deiuand br domestie curren assets.
\.
deereasing or eiiminating any wealth henLIIt tioin depteeatin the huine ctirrciK
.
SUMMARY
1. International
macroeco,io;ucs
e they
nomie resources and price level stability throughoui the world economy. Becaus
national
reflect nationai expenditure patterns and their international repercussions, the
g
studyin
for
al
tools
essenti
are
ts
accoun
nenls
e
inconie acoimts and the ba/onc o[pavi
nies.
econor
the macroeconomics of open. i nterdependent
factors of
2. A countrys gros na!ionalprocluct(GNP) is equal to the income received by its
types of
the
ing
Lo
accord
produclion. The national income accounts divide national inconie
curreni
the
ves.
and
spending that generate it: consnlnpfion, invevln:e,it, governlnent jnnrha
of
iess net receipts factor
account balaiwe. G;vss doniesiic produci (GDP). equal to GNP
ten-itoria! borders.
income lom abroad, ireasures the output produced within a countrys
invested. or pur
ed,
consum
be
must
GNP
trade.
tional
3. In an economy closed lo interna
equipment, and
plant.
build
to
t
output
curren
chased by the government. By uslng
. For a closed
output
future
into
output
t
inventories. investment transforms presen
of the saving
sum
the
so
ate.
aggreg
economy, investment is the only way to save in the
ent.
investm
equal
,
must
carried out hy the private and public sectors. mitional saving
ment
govern
ent,
4. In an open economy, GNP equals the sum of consumption. investm
ed if
balanc
be
purchases. and netexports of goods and services. Trade does not hase to
The difference
the economy can borrow from and Iend to the rest of the sorld.
e, equals the
hetween the economys exports and imports. the current account balanc
s.
service
and
goods
of
use
total
its
and
output
ys
difference hetween the econom
closed
a
Unlike
ers.
foreign
to
lending
net
ys
5. The current account also equals the countr
al
Nation
ent.
investm
foreign
and
tic
economy. an open economy can save by domes
e.
t
balanc
t
accoun
saving therefoie equals dornestic investment pius the curren
CH APTE P
1 3
317
KEYTERMS
asset, p. 306
batanee ol payments
accounling, p. 294
capital accoun(, p. 307
eentrat hank. p. 312
consumption. p. 298
curreni accouno batance. p. 300
(inancial accnunt. p. 306
government hudget deficit. p. 304
goveiiiment purchases p. 299
PROBLEMS
uujeconIab
1. We stated in this chapter ilmt GNP accounts avoid double counting by inciuding only
the value of fino! goods and services sold on the market. Should the measure of im
ports used in the GNP accounts thcrefrc be defined io include only imports of final
goods and services from ahroad? What about exports?
2. Equation (13-2) tells us ihat io reduce a current account deficit, a countrv musi increas
e
its private saving, reduce domestic investmeni, or cui its governrnent budget deficit.
Nowadays, some peopie recomrnend restrictions on omports from China (and other coun
ines) io reduce the American current account deficit. How would higher U.S. barriers to
irnports affect its private saving, domestic inveslment and governnent deficit? Do you
agree that impori restrictions would necessarily reduce a U.S. current accounr deficit?
3. Explain how each of the following transactions generates two entriesa credit and a
debiiin the American balance of payments accounts, and describe how each entry
would be classiticd:
a. An Arnerican buys a share of German stock, paying by writing a check on un
account with a Swiss bank.
b. An Arnerican buys a share of German stock. paying the seller with a check on an
American bank.
31$
PART THP EE
()p&zn-Econoiii 11acrocconoinics
e. The Korean government carries out an otheial ioreign exehange intervention iii which
it uses ( Iais held iii an American bank io hiiy Korean curency troni its eitizens.
,
d. A tounst troni Detron huys a meal at ati expensive restaurani In Lyons. France
JflL! with a travelers check.
n
e. A California winemaker conlributes a case of cahernet sauvignon br a Londo
wine tasting.
CII
A PT E F
I 3
3 19
FURTHER READINGS
IZui-opean Comiu ission, I nteriiational Monetary Fu id, Organisation fir Economie Cooperatio
n and
Development. Llnited Nations, and World Bank System a/ National Accomu,ts 2005.
New York:
Uni ted Nai ions. 2009. De li n ti ve guidel nes 6w constructing national i nconie and product
accounts.
Williani Grievei, Gary Lee. and Francis Warnock. The U.S. System [or Measuring CrossBord
er
Investmcnt in Sccurities: A Primer vitIi a DJSCLISSIOn of Reccnt Devclopmen
is. Fedemi Rcscne
liulkiin 87 (Ocloher 2001 pp. 633650. Critica! description ol U.S. procedures
[or nieasurmg
loreign assets and Iiabilities.
I ntcrnationai Moneiary Fund. I3alance o/ Paimenis mmid IntermiatIonal Inie.si,nent Posnion Manna!,
fiih edition. Washington. D.C.: tnternationa! Monctary Fund. 2009. Authoritative trealmeni
o[
balance (il paynleniS accounti ng.
International Monctary Fund. Funi! RtpO,1 a/the lVorking Part on the Statistica!
i)iscrepancv in
,Vorld Curremii .4ccoiimii l3olomu es. Washington. D.C.: Iniernational Monctary Fund.
September
1987. Discusses the statistical discrepancy in the world current account balance. its iniplications
br po!icy analysis, and reeornmendations 6w more accurate mCasUrement.
Philip R. Lane and Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti. The Exiernal Wealth o[ Nations
Mark Il: Revised
and Extended Estiniates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 19702004. .loimrnal oflnternation
al
Lco,,omu-,v 73 (Noveniber 2007), pp. 223250. Applies a common methodology to conslruct
inlernational position data [or a large sample of countrics.
Robcrt E. Lipsy. Changing Paitcrns of Iniernational 1nesimeni in and by the Uniied
Siates, in
Martin S. Feldstein, ed. The Uniie/ S!aics in the World Economv. Chicago:
Uniersity of
Chicago Press. 1988. pp. 475545. Flisiorical perspective on financial flows to and
from the
Uniied Siaics.
Catherine L. Mann. Pcrspeciives on the U.S. CUiTent Account Deficit and Sustainability.
Journol
of Econo,nic- Pervpcciimev 16 (Summer 2002). pp. 131152. Examines the causcs and
conse
(]UCICCS of recent U.S. current accouni deficits.
James E. Meade. The Bobine of Pavmnenis, Chapteis 13. London: Oxford Universitv Press. 1952.
A classic analytical discussion ol balancc ol payments concepts.
Cdric Tulle. The Impact of Exchange Rate Movemcnts on U.S. Foreign Dcbt. Curreni
Issues in
Economics and Finance (Federal Rescrve Bank of New York) 9 (January 2003),
pp. 17.
Discusses the iniplications of asset price changes for U.S. foreign asscls and liabilities.
ueconIab
Il your exam were tomorrow, would you be ready? For each chapter,
MyEconLah Practice Tests and Study Plans pinpoint which sections you have
mastered and which ones you need to study. That way, you are more efficient
with your study time, and you are better prepared for your exams.
To see how it works, turn to page 9 and then go to
www.myeconlab.com/krugman
C H A P T E R
r
:
I
;
:
A:
j
320
CH APTE P
counlries goods
afl(l
32 1
SeEV1UeS.
LEARNLNGGOAL
After reading ilis chap[ei you wil I be ahle lo:
Relale exhangc rate
IngeS lo chan4es in the relative prices of countnes
expurts.
Des;rihe the slructure and functions of the foreign exchange rnarket.
Use exchange Mles lo calcLIIale and compare reiurns on assels clenominaled
i i di fferen I currencies.
$75.
322
PART TH REE
TABLE 14-1
wWw.fLco8n/cwt.ncydta
CURRENCY R3TLS
(1)90
0.LA11
CL.--,
4,43,)
(P.r)
(09
A)74i7fl.4
A,,, ),I.,
6,033,
(8?
6..,
4Oa i
(340)
lli)
01-8)
12)7,03
o 0o)
CLaR,ca
Czect, P,-p
(6)13,,,
Irvp)
(OK-)
()4v1. 1
(4367)
I4,)4 Oirng
([0,83)
(33)03,404
(;0,0)
3)1.,))
(2,3,43
C)
1.3,1,
I1 .4331,3
0
l7ft MolO
0,33*1,
4Ch1Ir4)
3,3,4)3
(413)
(NwP33oo4
73r,,cp,Sind
0,0.0,
11rw,r)
Pk,3).
4
P3,
P6)hpp,,,,
(513:
(7433.3)
(SOr)
.6).))
I 04.7
o /n
701(03
0))
112,L
4, 7 70
664370
(929120
507 690
3
8.34
?8(3
I. 0:))
71,,)
2(43.1,0
4, 3,1,1
14471
114910
,,N0
61)700
12).,,)
3,4 f.3)
I) ((/3)
6,3101
0,0.143
I)
I: 4149
1 131,
1)0533
I
I- 2 -0
-
3444,4544)
(04*)
441202
90714
00Do
-
ooqo
00079
043 31)
0003,4
(7 I00
.3404
0 1141
00297
000.1,
00)43)
0997,
)) 74)0
00,40
190000
C00r
Mo
Il.
I 99)3
04906
9)11:
-,
.3,
3.,?,
1,4 3
0673),
1,1
.4,2) 083
4 928
74-33
11,??
,
1)3)03
1
09 7300
(7690
30000 I,-l
4 lO,).
-00027
04(03 :09646
000?. 106 00)
-0012. 1011 133,,
034051
0043,,
020120
0),)
1)6:,
0000?
41211
001,:)
-0064. 161434
(7498
00007,
31,9,,
0)140)
8004))
-000)4
1)2)1
00)07)
3,11,,
08)3,,
-1) 102)3 1,7 73)01
0.340
001480
1144)
Clo,l
44,)
C-r.))
003)90
C1o:,n
44.4
Cio,*
,oji,,
C024C)
0)33394
007)7
12
-007431
I0?9
o 0(214
000)1
000)7
00076 0 141.
00)0)
80.11, 8317?
-00)1)
00241
(10(70
000
710-.)
2 84.:) I.) 44?
00)61,
00435 103679
:13,3 1110-412 21)1,4,,
4 10,63,
4., /(0 3.,,
0413,
0 443) 18,417
007120
00(1(4 3,31125
00)00
131(11,), 40)7)
07.2)
7) 7189
00))
33) I
00,412
111)5
I (-1,04 4/-ol
01!).
-0 33)90 . I 4, 0
,84.?7 1471,)) 0,6 .42
7)46 1)2011 49 1020
1124
od)),
0013,
2 07) lO 4. -090/I
0000, 1)0 3--) -00001
0009), 14)),), -00116
0044) 1,-) 1.) 00151
o 044,9
08319 127, 8131
01)0)).
I 0018 04409
0031,
-000.) 49179
01908 1941,9 00)2).
.31,4
003 .0
03(01
01)1)
09)73, 774 9k,,
00,4.
704). 13,111
07789
012)3 21) 12)3
00727
1)0)15 44(/(1
000123
-0,406 1205)90
)\3,n$
097,
(03
i: 0)1
4,35
132(9
70)21
115940
40126
0991,7
7043?.
4) 300
2 4)/)
,074
31,030
ln74
5,70
943,
(-37
7 )),,,S
700000
(?),ly)
00,,),,,,
47w
3
(
)4.,,,114)
(Lj
.,,oOArl,l
(12)
1))
,0,I, 4)30.3
))9,o)
00(33:,
(76,,
:,*,oo
(O,
1)wll
(III
(6))
(0,4,744
141,343
(00(34
r,,,k,
((ao)
034
(04,))
06(03,42w
10)
03o 2,14),
lhr Mo,),
((0,4,
(4,43333))))
0\,,
(P374)
1h3),-.14
019
(5)
3),, Monlh
I),,,,) 7*)),
))uo,,,
0,10)0 0642)
Oro (.440(0
4794)
(94-3)3
(0 0)
([o,)
3,44,))),
0,,
5,00
--
03)
C)or,;,
40171
-003,7,)
0031,
4 404,
.003)7
00)1,,
(321)4
1)7033 42007)
4111,
0025)
0000)
(7.09
0 0-101
-0000)
71.4
00,,?
-0 1,
79,77
70)2)3 11,),),,
01249,
4(439
0001,,
007.143
00)391)
I 27.
-014:0
00.h4 1)4.40),
003(4,) 1) 2)) -0 (1).
415)4 -0001.
11 (012)
(4),) -00(2)
-000).)
4)41)
00250
00001
1)00129
011,)
00441
08)59
0000))
0 0070
01)).,)
00001
(1)Q3,,
00804
0431,0
00,),),
-00075 (0 ./(3
014(0
2).) 3,0
007)
1)2)14
120000
I 01)00801
I -011
00011
00
00)0?
.10,,
15000 253828 -(3 (0)
1 (1)
13016
I .30(3
13007
00071
00000
03001
0(7011
3)1,74
00004
P0060
7090
CI... .7,
4.4.,)
0852)
80047
1)39.
03301
434.3
48030,
3,1430
0..)
17484
,-053b
(04.?
(8-3-,,:
4)
(lo,,
3
42.7)10
4111-7.)
7? 1
7 (4?),
5)701
,,,
1)4!!)
003/,
1) 80,
027)1)
0 304
1)21,.)
1. 4.-
1)0)1)
00003
02169
01013
00(4,
0004),
00)54
7.731.
.1 (.1,)
(55)4
--(4
1 2.
15537
2.-
30,63,3
00)!,
0)41,1
00043
001,)lJ
000(1)
0201212
0)13,,
(9.2142
:19124
1 2997
I 9(1
11950
131,98
I (72(34,
0002)
1210005
-
000)4
(0879 Fu
o,,o,
0X 7 1) 01h33 7,403e 2 6)
(0 508 (0
975,9,
4,o) 0674174,)) 7) 3
730130.7 (e ?o 6)
WWPt ,,
44,1,?, ,nIoiuMoo (,,n lI) 7004 Conio,y r0)fl010n4133412/ (0?) 80.1 .7ue0.yo,our.8.cb, 3)367
,roixa,,) 7044,34312,00.31,1)1)11)0.31: o, I lo ,,,,e,,.1,, 4,,
70, 3,0?034510,3)I: p.oIr4 I, (12 .7*)) ,,,ko,,o, 8.9,, )4, ,0(r-(,, http//.w.FO.0Om.fr03r6200d404
01,33033
544, 71.4(031(0 I,,n,6 979.) C,rfl3fl 8..,, /11,03
/L-,we,do ) 41, 33(0)) 3,3 .057/4 Fw,,,
o,, 10.16,,, P10, o.(I.- 8.1)34119 1.3/60.3,433
(13,4 :401:), (lI-) I IO.
340 (3,) 3,33)0 ))7.(,A LI Il, 1841)13, 70 64,1.30 4, 3 ),103I1,o) .1,3 .l2,)D)2 11,043111,1)0837, 700 33? ?JC 13,,,?
Rafr-red. ,4(
71.3)1974*0.333.1(124
,,,.-
Source: Data
from
20 0, p. 2$.
A change in the dollar/pound exchange rate would alter the swcaters dollar price. At
an cxchange rate of $ 1.25 per pound, the sweater WOUld cost only
(1.25 $I.C) X (50)
$62.50,
a.ssuming its price in terrns ol pounds remained the same. At an exchange rate o! $1.75 per
pound. the sweaters dollar price wotild be higher, eqtial to
(1.75 $I)
CC5O)
$87.50.
(S45)I(1.25 S/f)
36.
CH A O t[J 0
1 4
1
JxCIla
c
n Ra(cs aiid lie iorcgn lxchangc Marke: An Asset Approacli
323
ihc iha nge in the cxc hange raw lo un $ I .50 per flli nd o $ I .75 per poundan
appre
ciai i on o I the pou id agai usi the do! Iar hu i a depicc i ai 1011 ol the do! r
la agai nst the
pound
([45)/(1.75 $I[)
[25.71.
1/le
ji/ieigi prodl((lS.
price of a pair of Anierican jeans ix $45. the price of a sweaier in terms of pair
a
ofjeans
is ($75 per sweater)/( $45 per pair of)eans) = 1.67 pairs of jeans per sweater. Nawrally,
a
Briton ftces the same re1atic price of ([50 per seater)/([30 per pair ofjeans)
= 1.67
pairs ofjeans per sweater.
Table 14-2 shows the relative prices irnplied by exchange rates of $1.25 per potind.
S 1.50 per pound, and $ 1.75 per pound. on the ussurnption rhat the dollar price of jeans
and
the pound Prie of sweaters are unaffected by the exchange rate changes. To tesi
your un
derstanding, try io calcolate tilese relative prices for yourself and conlirm that the
outcorne
of the calculation is the same for a Briton and for an American.
The table shows that if the goods money prices do not change, an appreciation
of the
dollar againsi the pound niakes sweaters cheaper in Ierms of jeans (each pair
ofjeans buys
more sweaters) while a depreciation of the dollar against the pound makes sweaters
more
1.25
1.39
1.50
1.67
1.75
1.94
Note: The above calculaiions assume unchangcd nioney prices of $45 per
oair ofjeans and 50 per sweater.
324
PART
TI-i
REE
cxpensive in tcrns ol eans (each ir ol jeHns htiys wer sweaters). The compuLaIions
iiius(rae a generai principle: All e/ve equal, (lfl (q)/)re(ia!ioli o/o eounlri v urnnci rai.se,V
Ilu re/utili Inue ot it,v evport.v (111(1 Iowei-s the rela(iie /riei (i/ its ifllpoii.v. Con iervelv, a
ie prue o/
llepr((-Iatioii /oi iei:v the le/utile pi-/Le o/a eountri .v e.vpor!.v and rarve,v the re/ali
i,v iiporlv.
The Actors
The major participants in the foreign exchange rnarkt are commerciai banks, corporations
that engage in internationai trade. nonbank tinancia] institulions such as assetmanagement
firms and insurance companies. and central banks. lndividuais may aiso participate in the
foreign exchange marketfor example, the tourist who buys loieign currency itt a hoteis
ot torni foreign exchange
front deskbut such cash transactions are an insignificani fraction
trading.
\Ve now describe the major actors in the rnarket and their roles.
1. Coininercial bank-s. Commercial banks ai-e at the cente.r of the foreign exchange
rnarket bccause aimost every sizable internationai transaction involves the dehiting
and crcditing of accounts itt commercial banks in various financial centers. Thus, the
vast ma jority of foreign exchange transactions involve the exchange of bank deposits
denominated in different currencies.
Lets look at an example. Suppose ExxonMobii Corporalion wishcs to pay
i 60.00() lo a German supplier. First. ExxonMohil gets an exchange rate quotation
from its own commerciul bank. the Third Nationai Bank. Then it instructs Third
the suppliers
National to dehit ExxonMobiI.s dollar account and pay 160,00() into
by Third
ExxonMobii
to
quoted
rate
exchange
account ai a German hank. If the
from
dehited
Is
X
160.000)
euro
1.2
per
National i $ 1.2 per euro. 5 192,000 (= $
192,000
a
of
exchange
the
$
is
ExxonMobils account. The final result of the transaclion
deposil at Thrd National Bank (now owned by the German bank that supplied the
euros) for the 160.000 deposit used bv Third National lo pay ExxonMobils German
stipplier.
As the example shows. banks rotitineiy enter the foreign exchange rnarket to rneet
the needs of their customersprimarily corporations. in addition, a bank vi1i also
quote to other banks exchange rates at which it is wiliing to buy currencies from them
and seli currencies to them. Foreign currency trading among bankscalled interbank
tradingaccouuits for rnuch of the activity in the foreign exchange market. In fact. the
cxchange rates Iisted in Table 14i are interbank rates, the rates banks charge each
other. No amount iess than $1 million is traded at those rates. The rates available to
corporate customers, calied retail rates, are usually less favorable than the whole
sale interbank rates. The difference between the retail and the whoiesale rates is the
hanks compensation for doing the business.
Because their internationa] operations are so extensive, large commercial banks are
vc11 suited lo bring buyers and sellers ofcurrencies together. A multinational corpora
tion wishing lo convert 5100.000 mio Swedish kronor might fnd it difficult and costly
C HA PTE P
1 4
325
(o beate othei eorporations wishing io seil the iiglil arnonni oF kmnor. [3 serving
nany custoners simtiitaneously ihroiigh a singie large pLIfthiSe ol kronor, a bank can
eeoiloIili/e 00 illese seareh cosls.
2. Cor)l),wio,l,v. Corporatioiis with operations iii several countries frcquently make
(>1 receive payments in currencies other than (hai ol the
country in which ihcy are
headtiuaricred. To pay workers al a piani in Mexico. or example. I [3M may need
Mexican pesos. li IBM has only dolkirs earned by setling coinpu(ers in the United
States, il can acquire the pesos il needs hy htiying them wiih its dollars in the toreign
exehange markei.
3. iVoiibunk /j,l(lliLicJ( iiIs(i!iflioiIs. Over the years, deregulation of tinancial markets
in the United States, Japan, and other countrics has encmiraged nonbank tinancial insti
tutions sueh as mutua) funds to offer their eustomers a broader range of services, many
ol them indistinguishahle troni hose oltered hy banks. Among these have been xervices
involving foreign exchange transactions. lnstitutionab investors such as pension funds
otten trade foreign currencies. So do insuranee companies. Hedge funds. whicbi cater io
very wealthy individuais and are
noi bound by the government rcgulaiions that limit
mutua) funds trading strategies, trade actively in the foreign exchange market.
4. Central hanks. In the previous chapter we Iearned that central banks sometimes
intervene in foreign exchange niarkets. VVhile the volume of ccntrai bank transactions is
i.ypically noi barge. the impact of these transactions may be great. The reason foi this im
pact is that participants in the foreign exchange market waich central hank actions
closeby
for clues abotii future macroeconomic poi icies that may affeci exchange rates. Government
agencies other than centrab banks may aiso trade in the foreign exehange rnarket. bui eco
tral banks are the rnost regular oflcial participants.
tAprit (989 lgures come Iiorn surveys carried out simulianeousi3 hy the Federal Reserve Hank
of New York.
the Bunk of Iiniand. the Bank of Japan. the l3ank of Canada and inonetarv auihorities from
France, Iialy, the
Netherlands. Siiwnpore. Hone Kong. afld Australia. The Aprii 2010 surve was carried
out by 53 central banks.
Reviscd tigures are reported in Triennial Central bank Survey of Foleigii Exchange
ami Derivatises Market
Activty in Aprii 2010: Pre]iminury Giobai Results: Bank for International Settlenents,
Baset. Switzerland.
Septernhcr 20 10. Dail) U.S. foreign currencvtrading in 1980 averugedoniy around S18
hiihon.
326
PAPT TH PE E
The i nlegrat ion o) li mineiiI centers i inpl ies that there caii he no signi icant di tThrence
hetween the doilar/euro exchange rate quoted in New York itt A.M. and the dollarleuro
exclange rte ijuoted in I ondon al the same time ( which corresponds (o 2 RM. London
lime). Il the euio were sellng tor $ I i in New York and S 1 .2 in London. prolits couid he
made through arbitrage, the process ol huying a cunency eIleaj) and selling it dear. Ai the
I
Ilrices iisted above. a trader could. br instance, purchase I million in New York br $ I
of
probi
a
pure
making
million,
(or
1
.2
London
in
$
euros
the
seIl
mi Ilion and imniediately
$ I 00.000. Il al I iraders tried to cash in on the npportunity. however, their clemand ft)r
euros in New York wouid cirive up the dollar price of cmos ihcre, and their supply ofeuros
in London would drive down the doilar price of euros there. Very quickly. the difference
hetween the New York and London exchange rates would disappear. Since foreign
exchangc traders careftilly watch their computer screens tr arhitrage opportunities. the
few ihat anse are smali and very short1ied.
While a freign exchange transaction can match any two currcncies. most transactions
(rotighly 85 pcrcent in Aprii 2010) are exchanzes of loreign currencies lor U.S. dollars.
This ix true even when a banks goal ix to sei] one nondollar eurrency and buy another!
A bank wishing to sei] Swiss francs and buy Israeli sheke]s, tor example. wilJ usuallv xcii
its francs lor dollars and then use the dolars to huy shekels. Whi]e this procedure may
appear roundabout. it is acwaily cheaper for the hank than the alternative ol trying to lind
advantage of trading through the
a hoider of shekels who wishes lo buy Swiss francs. The
dollar isaresult of the United States importance in the world economy. Because the
volume oF internationai transactions involving dollars ix so great, il ix not hard to (md
parties willing Lo trade doilars against Swiss francs or shekels. In contrasL relativeiy few
.
2
transaclions require direct cxchange.s of Swiss francs for shekels.
deals. the U.S. dollar is sogiie
exchange
foreign
Because o) its pivotal role in so many
is wideiy used [o denomi
that
one
is
linies calied a vehicle currency. A vehicle currency
nate international contracts made by parties who do noi reside in the countrv that issues
the vehicle cuncncy. Il has heen suggested that the euro, which was introduced al the stanI
of 1999, vi11 evolve mb a vehicle culrency on a par with the doliar. By Apri] 2010, ahout
39 percent of foreign exchane tradcs were against eurosIcss than half the share of the
doilar. albeit ahove the figure of 37 percent clocked three years earlier. Japans yen ix the
third most imporlant currency, with a market share of 19 percent (out of 200). The pound
stenling, once second only lo the dollar as a key international currency, has dec]ined
3
greativ in importance.
rates
The Sws. tranc/sheket exchange rate eco be catcutated from the dollar/t ranc and uottat!sheket exch,tnee
the
and
franc
per
50.80
Is
rate
dotlarltranc
the
I!
rate.
as the doltar/shekel rate dividcd bv the doltar/!ranc
0.25
5/frane)
0
is
S/shekeh/(0.8
rate
(0.20
franc/sheke)
Swiss
the
then
shckel.
per
50.20
is
rate
(Ioltar/sheIeI
sws tranc/sheket. Exchange rates hetseen noridollar currer:cie are c,iiled cross r;ites hy toreign exchangc trader.
1:or a more detaited dicuss:on of vehicte currencies. sec Richard Portes and Hdine Rey. The Eniergence of
3
307343. Data on currency share
the Euro as an tnternationat Currency. IZcanoimc PoIici 26 (Aprit 998).
o! the future roies ot the
assesment
recent
Far
3.
a
tabtc
come froin Bank for International ScttIement. op. ce..
Eom ai TL o: The Nei!
The
eds..
Posen.
Adain
S.
y
and
PisaniFerr
ieaii
essays
n
sec
the
euro.
ant
the
dollar
Ciba! (un tu e. (Washineton. DC.: Peterson institute far tntenictionat Fcononucs. 2009).
CH A PTE R
1 4
Aii
isset Approch
327
Forei gn exchaiige de1 s soinet i fliCS speCi ly a /1, 1lire t ransaci i OlI dateone that n ay
be
30 days. 9() days. i 8() days, or even several years away. The exchange rates t
uoied in
1
such transactions are calied ftrward exchange rates. In a 30day forward transaution.
br example. two parties may commit themselvcs on Aprii i (o a spol exchange ol
100.000 fi)r $ I 55.00() on May I The 30day torward exchange rate is therelore 1.55
$
per potmd. and il is generally diiferent hom the spol rate and from the forward rates
applied to dibferent future daes. When you agree to scil pourids br dollars on a future
date al a forward rate agreed un loday, you have sold potinds borward and bought
dol
Iars forward. The future date on which the currencies are actuaily exchanged is called
the tolio dote.
4 Table 14I shows forward exchange rates for some maor currencies.
Forward and spot exchange rales, while not necessarily equal, do move closely together,
as illustrated for monthly data on dollar/pound rates in Figure 141. The appendix to
this
chapter, which discusses how forwarci cxchange rates are determined, explains this dose
reiationship hetween movements In spot and forward raws.
An exarnple shows why arties may wish lo engage in borward exchange transac(IOns.
Suppose Radio Shack knows that in 30 days il must pay yen to a Japanese supplier for
a
shipment of radios arriving then. Radio Shack can seli each radio for $ 100 and must pay
its supplier Y9,000 per radio; its prolt clepends on the dollar/yen exchange rate. At the cnr
rcnt spot exchange rate of $00105 per yen, Radio Shack would pay ($0.01 05 per yen) X
(9,000 per radio) = $94.50 ier radio and would therefore rnake $5.50 on eaeh radio
imported. But Radio Shack will not have the funds to pay the supplier until the radios ar
rive and are soid. Ef over the next 30 days the doilar unexpectediy depreciates (o $0.01 15
ier yen, Radio Shack will have to pay ($0.0 115 per yen) X (9,000 per radio) = 5 103.50
per radio and so wiIl take a $3.50 los,s on each.
To avoid this risk, Radio Shack can make a 30-day forward exchange deal with Bank
of
America. If Bank of America agrees io seli ycn lo Radio Shack in 30 days at a rate of $0.0 107.
Radio Shack is assured of paying exactly ($00107 per yen) X (Y9,000 per radio) $96.30
per radio lo the supplier. By buying veii and seiiing dollars forwud, Radio Shack is guaranteed
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
Figure 14-1
DoIIar/Pound Spot and Forward Exchange Rates, 19832011
Spot and forward exchange rates tend to move in a highly correlated fashion.
Source: Datastream. Rates shown are 90-day forward exchange rates and spoi exchange rates, at end of month.
days past. it voukI take up lo two days io sente even spot foregn exchange transaciion.
In other word. the
value date tor a spol trailsaclion was actually two days after the deal was siruck. Nowadays.
rno5t spol trades of
328
PA PT TH REE
a prohl oF 3.70 per radio and Is insured againsi the possibi liiy that a udden exchange rate
change will ttim a proitaNe importing deal iuta a bss. In the jargon of the Ioreign exchange
maiket, we woiild say (hai Radio Shack has I,ded its Ircign currency risk.
Froin now un, wheii we mention an exchange rate bui dan i si)eci fy wheher it is a SJ)Oi
rate or a lorward iaie. We wiIl abways bc relerring il) the spol rate.
Aftreign exchange optioli gives its owner the right to buy or seil a specitieci amount of
at any time up to a specited expiration date. The other
foreign currency at a specifed
party to the dea], the options seller. is required Lo seil or huy the foreign currency at the
discretion of the options owner, who is under no obligation [o exercise his right.
Irnagine that you are uncertain about when in the next rnonth a foreign currencv pay
ment vill arrive. To avoid the risk of a IOSS, you may wish io buy a Jmt option giving yOU
the right lo sei] the foreign cunency at a known exchange rate ai any lime dunng the
month. If instead you expect to make a payment abroad sometime in the month. a cali
ojiion. which gives you the right to buy foreign currency lo make the payment ai a known
price. might be attraeti\e. Options can be written on maiy underlying assets (incbuding
foreign exchange futuresi, and, like futures, they are freely hought and sold. Forwards,
swaps, futures, and options are all exarnples ofjinancial cler,vatiics. .s hich ve encoun
tered in Chapter 13.
CHAPTER
I 4
Ati Asset
Approach
329
percentage increase in value it oIers over some time period. For examp
le, suppose that at the
heginning of 2012 you pay $ 100 for a share of stock issued by Financ
iai Soothsayers, Inc. if
the stock pays you a dividend of $1 at the beginning of 2013. and
if the stocks price rises
from $ 100 to $ 109 per share over the year. then you have earned
a rate of returri of IO percent
on the stock over 201 2that ix, your initial $ 100 investment has grown
in value Lo $ 110. the
sum of the $ I dividend and the $ 109 you could get hy selling your
share. Had Financial
Soothsayers stock stili paid otit its $1 dividend bui dropped in price
to $89 per share. your
$100 investment woud be worth only $90 by years end, giving a rate
of returri of iiega!iee
10 percent.
You often cannot know with certainty the returu that ari asset wilI actuail
y PY after you
huy it. Both the dividend paid hy a share of stock and the shares resale
price. for examp!e.
may be hard io iredict. Your decision therefore rnust be hased ori
ari e.vpccied rate of
returri. To calculate ari cxpected rate of re[urn over some time period
, you make your best
forecast of the assets torni value at the periods end. The percen
tage difference between
that expected future value and the price you pay for the asset
today equals the assets
expected rate of return over the time period.
When we measure ari assets rate of return, ve compare hos ari investm
ent in the asset
changes in torni value between two dates. In the previous exarnp
le. we compared how the
value of ari investment in Financial Soothsayers stock change
d between 2012 ($100) ami
2013 ($1 10) to conclude that the rate of return ori the stock was
10 percent per year. We
cali this a do/br rate of return because the two values we compa
re are expressed in terms
of dollars. It is also possible. however. to compute diffrent rates
of returri by expressing
the two values in ternls of a treign currency or a cornmodity such
as gold.
The Real Rate of Return The expected rate of return that savers
consicier in dcciding
which assets to hold ix the expected real rate of return,
that is, the rate of return
computed by measuring asset values in terms of some broad
representative basket of
products that savers regularly purchase. I ix the expected rea] return
that inatters because
the ultimate goal of Sa ing is future corisumption. anci only the
real return measures the
goods and services a saver cari buy in the future in returri for giving
up some corisurnption
(that Is, saving) today.
To continue our example, suppose that the dollar value of an
invcstrnent in Firiancia]
Soothsayers stock increases by 10 percent between 2012 arid
20! 3 hut that the doliar
prices of all goods and services a/so increase by IO perceni. Then
in terms of outputthat
ix, in real terinsthe investnlent would be worth no more in
2012 than in 2013. With a
rea] rare of return of zero Financiai Soothsayers stock would noi
bc a very desirable asset.
PART TH REE
330
Macrocconomics
exanipie
we
si
CH AP C F
1 4
331
The rea) rate of return offered by the wine Is 15 percent (= 25 percent 10 percent) while
that offered by the bond is oniy 10 percent ( 20 percent 10 percent). Notice that
the dii
ference hetwecn the dollar returns of the two assets (25 percent 20 percent) must equa)
the
difference between their rea) returns (15 percent 10 percent. The reason fer this equality
is
332
PART THFEE
of
that. given the tw() assets doi lar returns. a chailge in the rate ai whch the doilar
anlolint.
same
goods are rising changes both asseis real retunix by the
The distinction hetween real ratcs or retuni and (ioiIar rates ol reiurn iiiusiiates an
important concept in studying hov savers evaiuate ddiereni ;lsseis: The reiurns on two
iL
aSSCIS cannot be eoinpared unless they are measured in the SaIn( unitS. For exampie.
makes no sense io compare directly the reul reiurn on the bottie ot wine (15 perceni in our
example) with the doliar return OI the hond (20 plrceni) or Lo compare the doliar reium on
oid paintings with the euro return oii gold Only after the returns are expressed in terms of
a common unii of measurefor example. all in terms ot dollarscan we teli which asset
oflers the highesi expected real rate of return.
2. Liquiditv. Assets also differ according to the cost and speed at which savers can
dispose of them. A house. for example, is noi very liquid because its sale usuaiiy
requires time ami the services ot brokers and inspectors. To sell a house quickly. one
might have to seli at a relaiively low price. in contrasi, cash is the mosi liquid of all
assets: It is always acceptable ai face value as payment for goods or other assets.
Savers prebr io hold some iiquid assets as a precaution againsi unexpected pressing
expenses that might force ihem to xcii less iiquid assets aL a bss. They wiil therefore
consider an assets liquidity as vel1 as its expected return and risk in deciding how
much of it io hoid.
Interest Rates
As in other asset rnarkets. pariicipants in the foreign exchange market base their demands
for deposits of difbrent currencics ori a comparison of these assets expected rates of
return. To compare returns on different deposits, market PariICiPants need two pieces of
information. First, they need to know how the money values of the deposits iii change.
Second. they need io know how exchange raies wiil change so ihat they can translate rates
of retum measured in different currencies mio comparabie terms.
The frst piece of information needed to compute the rate of return oti a deposit of a
particuiar currency is the currencys iiiterest rate, the amount of that currency an indi
viduai can earn by lending a unii of the currency for a year. At a dollar interest rate ol
0.10 (quoted as 10 percent per year, the lender of $1 receives $1.10 ai the end ob the
CH A PTE
P I
333
year, $1 ol which ix principil and lo cents ol which ix interesi. L(u)ked ai troni the other
side ot the trarisaclion. the inteiext rate on dollarx is also the amount that niust he
(o
horrow $1 trir a year. Wher yoti htiy a LJ.S. Treasniy hill, yOu earn the intelest rate (in
dollars heeause you are Iending dollars to the U.S. government.
Interesi ralex play ari important ole in the toreign exchange market becauxe the large
deposits traded there pav interesi. each al a rate reflecling ii.s CLIITCflC oi denomination.
Fur exainple. when the interest rate on dollars ix 10 percent per vear, a $ 100,000 deposit
ix worih $ I I 0.001) atter a year; when the interest rate on eurox ix 5 perceni per year, a
100,000 deposil ix worth 05,000 after a year. Depoxits pay intcrest hecause they are
really loans honi the depositor ti) the hnk. Wheii a corporaliofl or a linancial institution
deposilx a cun-ency in a hank. it ix Iending that currency io the hank raiher than llsing it br
some current expenditure. In other words, the depositor is aCquiring ari asset denomi nated
in the currency it depositx.
The dollar interest rate is simply the dollar rate of return on dollar deposits. You buy
the deposii hy Iending a hank $ 100.000, and when you are paid back with IO percent
interesi at the erid of the year, your assei ix worth $110.000. This gives a rate of return of
10.000
I 00.000)! 100.000 = 0. IO, or 10 percent per year. Similarly, a foreign cnr
rencys interest rate measurex the foreign currency retui-n on depositx of that currency.
Figure 142 showx the monthly behavior of interesi rates on the dollar aiicl the Japanese
yen from 1978 to 2010. These inlerest rates are noi measured in comparable terms, so
there is no reason for them to be dose to each other or to move n similar ways over time.
5
12
Figure 14-2
Interest Rates on Dollar and Yen Deposits, 19782011
Since dollar and yen interest rates are not measured in comparable terms, they can move quite differently
over time.
Source: Data stream. Three-month interesi rates are shown.
5
C
tiapter 6 detined leal interest rates. which dtC simpl rea! rates at return on toans. that is. interest rates
expressed in terms of a consumprion basket. tnteres rates expressed in errn of currencies are culled nominai
nieresi rates. The eonnctimn helween rea! and nominai inlerest raies is discussed
in detail in ChpLer 16.
334
FAR-r TH PE E
A Simple Rule
A simple rule shortens this calculation. First. defne the rate of depreciation of the dollar
against the euro as the percentage increase in the dollar/euro exchange rate oer a year. In
the last example. the dollars expected depreciation rate is (1.165 1.10)11.10 = 0.059.
or roughly 6 percent per ycar. Once yti have caiculated the rate of depreciation of the
dollar against the curo, our rule is this: The do//ar rate of return (in euro deposits Is
appivximatclv the curo interesi rate p/us the mie o/deprccialion of the do//ar a,aiist
the euro. In other vvords. to transiate the euro return on curo cleposits into dollar terrns.
you need to add the rate at which the euros doflar price rises over a year to the euro
interest rate.
In our example. the sum of the euro interest rate (5 liercent) and the expected deprecia
tion rate of the dollar (roughly 6 percent) ix about I! percent. which ix what ve found to
be the expected dollar return oli euro deposits in our first calculation.
CH A PTL R
1 4
hy
335
Lsf(-
This expected rcturn is what nust be cotupared \vlth the interest rate
un oneyear dollar
deposits. Rs, in deciding whether dollar or curo deposits offer the higher
expected rate of
6 The expected rate of return difference between doilar and euro
return.
deposits is there
fore equa! tu R less the above expresslon.
[R + (E
7
Es,cVEsicl
Re
)IE
5
E
1
,.
(1411
When the di//e renLe oboe i.v posi!itc, do//ar deposit.s v,e/d the
higler evpected rate of
iiheji it ix ilegalive. euro deposit.v iieId the higher e.vpected rate o/relur
n.
Table 14-3 carries out sorne illustrative comparisons. In case 1,
the interest difference
in favor of dollar deposits is 4 percent per year (R
0.10
0.06
0.04). and no
change in the exchange rate is expected [(E
c
1
Eje)/E, = 0.001. This means that the
expected annua! rea! rate of rei urn un doilar deposits Is 4 percen
t higher than that un curo
deposits. so that, other things equal, you would prefer to hoid your
wealth as dollar rather
than euro deposits.
retl!171,
Case
1
2
3
4
0.! 0
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.12
0.00
0.04
0.08
0.04
(EjE,)
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.02
you compute the expected dollar returo on euro deposits using the exact
lve-srep method we described before
introducing the imple mie. oull (md that t actuaily equals
(I + R t
tE
1
)(E
I.
)/E +
4
&
X (L
The epre.sion aboe s cry dose to the formula derved from the
simple mie when. as is usually the case, the
product R
4 X (Ej
Esf()IES/t is a smali number.
--
336
PART TCIREE
oIiset hy an
Ii case 2 the interest dilYerence Is the same (4 percent). bui il Is just
re liave the
therefo
assets
two
The
i.
cxpected depreciatiori rate of the doilar ol 4 percen
same expecied rate o rewrn.
nce in tavor o!
Case 3 is sirnilar to the one discus.sed earlier: A 4 percent ilterest differe
the dollar. so
of
dollar deposits is more than offsei by un 8 percent cxpecied depreciation
euro deposits Lire pre!erred hy market participants.
dollar
In case 4. there is a 2 percent interest difference in favor of euro depoxits, bui the
ol
rate
ed
expect
The
year.
the
over
i
percen
4
by
euro
is expected to ap/mciafr against the
its.
clepos
euro
on
that
than
higher
year
t
per
retuni on dollar deposits is therefore 2 percen
rate of rewrn dii
So far ve have heen translating all returns into dollar terms. Bui the
s returns in
expres
to
chosen
we
ferentials we calculuted woukl have been the same had
wanted to
we
le.
examp
terms o! euros or in terms of some third currency. Suppose. for
mie, we
simple
our
measure the return on dollar deposits in terrns of euros. Following
euro
the
iation of
would add to the dollar interesi rate R the expected rate of deprec
t the dollar is
againsi the dollar. Bui the expectecl rate of depreciation of the euro agains
euro, that Is. the
t
approximately the expected rate of appa-eciation of the dollar agains the
in front of it.
sign
minus
a
with
euro
the
t
agains
expected rate of depreciation of the dollar
is
t
deposi
tiollar
This means that in terms of euros. the return oii a
(E/(
Es/f)/E/(.
sion (14-I).
The diffemence hetween the expression above and R is identical io expres
in terms of
returns
re
measu
we
r
Thus, it makes no difference io our comparison wheihe
cy.
culTen
sarne
the
dollars or euros, as long as we measure them both in terms of
the asseis
We ohserved earlier that a saver deciding which assets io hold rnay care ahout
Similarly, the
iiskiness and liquidity in addition to their expected rea! rates of return
on risk and
also
bui
returns
on
only
s
noi
dernand for foreign currency assets depend
on dollar
that
ihan
is
higher
ts
deposi
euro
liquidity. Even if the expected dollar retura on
to hold
payoff
if
the
ts
deposi
euro
deposits, for example. people rnay be reluctant io hold
ing thern varies erratically.
the foreign
There Is no consensus among economists about the importance of risk in
. For
debate
of
exchange market. Even the definition of foreign exchange risk is a topic
all
de
returns on
now we wilI avoid these complex questions by assuming that the rea!
In other words. we
posits have equa! riskiness. regard!ess of the currency ofdenomination.
currency assets.
foreign
for
d
deman
ce
the
anfluen
not
are assuming that risk differences do
r 18.
Chapte
in
r,
howee
detail.
greater
in
We discuss the role of foreign exchange risk
cnr
which
g
decidin
in
ty
factors
liquidi
Some mai-ket participants may be iniluenced by
interna
ting
conduc
uals
individ
rencies io hold. Most of these participants are frrns and
for exanip!e, may
tional trade. An Arnerican importer of French fashion products or wines,
ed rate of return on
find it convenient to hold euros for routine payments even if the expect
inteniational trade
euros Is ]ower than that on do!lars. Because payrnents connecied with
.
CH APTL R
I 4
Ali
Asset
Appioach
337
make up a erv sniali fraction of total foreign exehange tnmsactions. ve ignore the liquid
ity )uotiVe br holding Iorein currencies.
Wc are therebore asstlming br nOW ihat participanlx in the boreign exchange market
base their dernands bor freign currcncy assets exclusively on a coniparison o those as
sets expected rates of retirn. The main reason for making this assumption ix that il sim
plibies our analysis of how exchange rates are determined in the boreign exchange market.
In addition, the risk and Iiquidity nwtivcs for holding foreign currencies appear to be o
secondary importance ft)r many of the internalional macroeconomic issues discusscd in
the next tw chapters.
338
PAPT TH R
e: E
sits otter the xaiie file ot letuil and participiints in the kreign exehange market me
de
w
1
((luaIlY W1IIiHLZ (O hold eiihei. (This ix case 2 in
(.)nly when all exl)ected rates ol return are equalthat ix, when the inleres parily con
dition lioldsis there no excex.s supply o! some type oC deposit and no cxcess demand fr
;inother. The flreign exehange marLet is in equilibiium when no type ol deposii ix in
excess demand or cxcess supply. We can iherelore say that the Ioreign exchange market is
in equi Iihnum when. and only when, the interesi parity condition hoJds.
li) represent interesi parity bctwecn dollar and curo deposils symholicallv. we tise
expression (14.I which shows the difterence hetween the two assets expected rates of
return measured in dollars. The expected rates of return are equal when
.
1
l?c + (E,
(14-2)
You prohably su.spect that when dollar deposits nOer a higher return than euro deposits,
the dollar wiIl appreciate againxt the euro as investors all try to shift their funds into dol
lars. Conversely, the dollar shoukl depreciate againxt the euro when it ix euro deposits that
initially ofler the higher return. This intuition ix exactly correct. To understand the mecha
nism at work, however, we must take a caretul Iook at how exchange rate changes like
these help ti) maintain cquilibrium in the 1oreign exchatige market.
raises
this rcturn.
CHAPTER
1 4
339
Iodays DoIiar/Euro
Exclange Rate
Interest Rate on
Euro I)eposit.s
Expcctcd Dollar
Dcpreciation Rate
Agaiust Euro
1.05
Expected Dollar
Rcturn oii Euro
Deposits
1
Ls
Rc
1.07
1.05
I .03
I .02
1.00
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
R +
0.019
0.00
0.019
0.029
0.05
1.05
0.031
0.05
0.069
0.079
0. I O
lt may run countcr io your intuition that a depreciation of the dollar against the
CU()
makes euro deposits less attractie relative to dollar cleposits (by Iowering the expccted
dollar return on curo deposits) while an appreciation of the dollar makes euro deposits
more attraclive. This result wiIl seem Iess surprising if you remember wc have assumed
that the expected future dollar/curo rate and interest rates do not change. A dollar deprec
i
ation today. for example. means the dollar now needs to depreciate by a sinai/cr amount
to
reach any given expected future level. 1f the expected future dollar/euro exchange rate
does not change when the dollar depreciates today, the dollars expected future deprecia
tion aeainst the curo therefore falls, or, alternatively, the dollars expected future apprecia
flon rises. Since interest rates also are unchanged, Iodays doHar depreciation thus makes
euro deposits Iess attractive compared with dollar deposits.
Pui another way. a current dollar depreciation that affects neither exchange rate expec
tations nor interesi rates leaves the expected future dollar payoli of a euro deposit the
same
bui raises the deposits curreni doilar cost. This change naturally makes euro deposits less
attractive relative (o clollar deposits.
lt may also run counter to your intuition that todav s exchange rate can change while
the exchange rate expected for the /iturc does not. We wil] indeed study cases later
in this
book when both of these rates do change at once. We nonetheless hold the expected
future
exchange rate constant in the present discussion because that is the clearest way to illus
trate the ellect of todays exchange rate on expected returns. If it helps, you can
imagine
we are looking at the impact of a teinporal-v change so brief that it has no effect
on the
exchange rate expected for next year.
Figure 14-3 shows the calculations in TaNe 14-4 in a graphic forni that wiII be helpful
in our analysis of exchange rate determination. The vertical axis in the figure measures
todays dollar/euro exchange rate and the horizonal axis measures the expected dollar
return on euro deposits. Forfixed values of the expected future dollar/euro exchange rate
and the euro interest rate, the relation between todays dollar/euro exchange rate and
the
expected dollar return on euro deposits defnes a downward-sloping scheclule.
34()
PART i FI REE
Figure 14-3
The Reiation Between the Curreni
DoIIar/Euro Exchange Rate ami the
Expecled Doilar Re(urn on Euro
Deposits
- = 0.05. i
4
G ivcn I , = I .05 and R
ip 11CL IdlIOfl O thl dollar 1aint th euro
ra iscs tilI expected ntu rn I)fl CLI O) de
posits. nnasund in t(.rIfls (Il dI)IIIr.
Todays dollar/euro
11
exchange rate, Er
1.07
1 05
1.03
1.02
1.00
0.031
0.050
0.069
0.079
0.100
Figure 144 illustrates how the equilibrium dollar/euro exchange rate is determined
under these assumplions. The vertical scheduie in the graph indicates the given leve] ofR.
the return on dollar deposits measured in terms of dollars. The downward-sloping sched
dollars. depends
tue shows how the expectcd return on curo deposits, measured in terms of
in the sarne way
derived
is
scheduie
on the curreni dollar/euro exchange rate. This second
as the trne shown in Figure 143.
The equilihrium dollar/eui-o rate is the oiie indicated hy the intersection of the two
At this exchange rate, the returns on dollar and euro deposits
schedules at point 1,
are equal, so that the interest parity condition (14-2).
Rs
R + (E
is satisl-ed.
Lets sec why the exchange rate will tend io settie at point I in Figure 14-4 if it is mi
tially itt a point such as 2 or 3. Suppose iirst that we are al pomI 2. with the exchange rate
equa] to E-. The downward-slnping schedule rneasuring the expected dollar return on
euro deposits te]ls us that at the exchange rate E,, the rate of return on euro deposits is
Iess than the rate of return on dollar deposits. Rs. In this situation anyone holding euro
deposits wishes to sei] them fr the more lucrative dollar deposits: The foreign exchange
a
market is out of equilibrium because participants such as hanks and multinationai corpor
tions are unwilling io hold euro deposits.
How does the exchange rate adjust? The unhappy owners of euro deposits attempi to
sei] them for doliar deposits, bui because the rewrn on doilar deposits is higher than that
C HAPTEP
1 4
Figure 14.4
I)eterniination o( the Equihibriuni
Dohlar/Euio Exchange Rate
lE(
1
IiIihrIUfl in the tnrein
al
1)11
exehan;e mtrket
341
Exchange rate,
ET/(
Return on
is
doliar deposits
i ni
vvht re the txp I tci (io a i reI o rn
(101111 tiid curo deposils ate (quaI.
,
E3
5/4
-1--Expected return
on euro deposits
Rates ot return
(in dollar terms)
the chapter asks you lo show that this alternative way of looking at equi]ihriunt in the ireign uxchane market
gies the sarne answers as the rnethod used here in the tct.
342
PAPT TH I E E
Figure 14-5
Eftect of a Rise in the Dollar Iiiterest Rate
Maerocconornics
Exchange rate,
E$f,
Doilar return
----.
so
Expected
euro return
Rates of return
(in dollar terms)
factors that
that the exchange rate (which is the relative price of two assets) responds te
alier the expected rates of return on those two a.s.sets.
are high
t
Ve often rcad in the newspaper thai the dollar Is strong because U.S. interes rates
ents be
statern
tliese
Can
.
falling
are
rates
t
or that it Is failing because U.S. intcres
?
market
ge
explained using our analysis of the frorcign exchan
in the
Th answer this question ve again turn te a diagram. Figure 145 shows a rise
ts
deposi
interest rate on dollars, from R te R. as a rightward shift of the vertical dollar
the expected rewrn on dollar deposits is
return schedule. Ai the initial exchange rate
points I
now bigher than that on euro deposits by an amount equa) Lo the distance beteen
2).
(point
Eiate
te
and 1. As we have seen, this difference causes the doliar te apprec
future
ed
Because there has been no change in the euro interest rate or in the expect
on euro
exchange rate, the dollars appreciation today rases the expected dollar return
the
future.
in
iate
deprec
to
ed
expect
is
deposits hy increasing the rate al which the dollar
causes
Figure 14-6 shows the effect of a rise in the euro intcrest rate Rc. This change
euro
on
return
dollar
the downward-sloping schedule (which measures the expected
t
rate
interes
euro
deposits) te shift righlward. (To sec why, ask yourselfhow a rise in the
ed
expect
alters the dollar return on euro deposits, given the cuiTent exchange rate and the
future rate.)
is the
At the initial exchange rate E,. the expected depreciation rate of the dollar
on
that
s
now
exceed
ts
deposi
euro
on
rcturn
ed
same as before the rise in R, so the expect
ate
the
elimin
to
to
(frorn
E,)
rises
E,
dollar deposits. The dol]ar/euro exchange rate
t the
excess supply of dollar assets at point 1. As before, the dollars depreciation agains
of
rate
dollar
ed
the
expect
ng
euro eliminates the e\cess supply of dollar assets by Ioweri
iation
deprec
a
relurn on euro deposits. A rise in European interest rates therefore leads lo
C HAPTEIR
I --I
Lahin
1
c IZiIcs anil the 1oriiii Ixchanc M.iiket An Asset Appio.ich
343
Figure 14-6
Effect of a Rise in the Euro Interesi Rate
Exchange rate,
Dollar return
mi
Rise in euro
interest rate
euro return
5
A
Rates of return
(in dollar terms)
il
oC the dollar against the euro or, Iooked at from the European perspective, an appreciation
of the euro against the dollar.
Our discussion shows thai. all else equal, (UI ,,icreos in the int(rext paid mi deposits o,t
(i currencv causes tliat currencv to uppreciate cu,(u,I.vtforeign
Cn rrencies.
Before we conclude that the newspaper account of the effect of interest rates on
exchange rates is correct. .e inus rernember that our assumption of a co,istant expe.cted
future exchange rate often is unrealistic. In many cases. a change in interest rates will
be accompamed by a change in the expected future exchange rate. This change in the
expected future exchange rate wilI depend, in turn, on the economic causes of the interest
rate change. We compare different possible relationships between interest rates and
expected future exchangc ratcs in Chapter 16. Keep in mmd for now that in the rea! world,
we cannot predict how a given interest rate change wiIl altcr exchange rates unless ve
know whv the interest rate is changing.
344
PAIRT THREE
clepos,ts olier a higher cxpccted rate of returo (measured in dollar tcrms) than do doliar de
posits. The doliar theretore depreciates againsi the curo unti! equiiihrium is reached at pomi 2.
Wc conclude that. ali cisc equal. a rise in the ex,)ec!(d future excIuinge mie canNes a
rate
rive in the curreni evcha,e rate. Similar/y, a /i// in the crpccted /i,tIm cxcha,,e
cauves a /i11 in the curreni exchange rate.
Case Study
What Explains the Carry Trade?
Over rnuch of the 20()Us, .Iapaiicse ycn intciest rates wcre dose tu iero (a Figure 14-2
shows i whiie Atisiralia\ intercst raies we e comkniah! positive, clirnhing Lo aver
7 percent per year bv the spring ai 2(HIX.
\/hiic i niight ihicieioie ha e appeaicd it
proceeds
m yen and n est
tractive lt
paritv
interesi
(hie
huIRis.
duilii
in Austraiian
lunIi
tritee\
ueh
a
cnditkn InpiIe thai
not be .%v.1cma1i(-a//v profitable: i )n a\cragc.
shouidn t Ik interest ad antage ai Australian
duilars [c iped out by relative appieciat
of 1w yen?
N nici heiss. narlset ra r ranging troni
pioa ecd hedge
housewives Lo
and driving
doiiars
Australian
hiak did in fact pursue this strategy. mnvesting billions in
generali).
Moic
that currencys value up. rather than down, against the yen.
internationai investors frequently borrow lowinterest currencies (calied funding cur
rencies) and buy high-iiterest currencies (called investment currencies), with results
that can be prottahie over long periods. This activity is caiJed the carrv ira1e, and
while it is generaliy impossible to docunient the extent of carry trade positions accu
rately. they can become very Jarge when sizable international interest differentials open
up. Is the prevalence of the carry trade evidence that interest parity is wrong?
The hoiiest answer is that while interest parity does not hold exactly in practicein
pan because of the risk and liquidity factors mentioned aboveeconornists are stili
working hard to understand if the carry trade requires additional explanation. Their
work Is likely to throw further light on the functioning of foreign exchange markets in
-
trt:
1 4
yCl1;Iflc Rutcs
and the
Forciiii
345
investment return
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Figure 14-7
Cumulative Total Investment Return in Australian Doflar Compared to
Japaiwse Ven, 200 201 O
lhc Austrdhan Iull, yn ( arry trade h,is btin a iitinl on vcrage bui
is LIhLt In i,ddn larg r(v(rsb
j
as in 200t.
Soiir e:
hxpeciedappreciation
0.)
X I
--
((LI
X 40
The negative expected appreciation rate means that the yen is actuail
y expected to
appreciate on average against the Australian dollar. Moreover, the probab
ility of a
occurring in the first five years of the investment is only i (0.9 =
)
10.59 = 41
percent, less than 9
ffty-fifty. The resulting pattem of cumula
tive returns could easily look
much Iike the one shown in Figure 14-7. Calculations hke these are
suggestive, and
although they are unlikely to explain the fuJI magnittide ofcarry trade returns
, researchers
have found that investrnent currencies are particularly subject to abrupt crashe
s, and fund
ing currencies to abrupt 0
appreciations.
1f crashes aic independent events over time, the probabilit that a crash does
9
not occur over Ove ye,lrs is
Thereiore. the robabihty that a crash docs occur in the fivc-year period
is i (0.9)
346
PART TH REE
in i rkct s h r in terha ik i
i in
SUMMARY
ys
i. An e.vchange rate is the price o! one countrys currency in terins of another countr
us
to
enable
they
e
becaus
ns
ng
decisio
currency. Exchange rates plav a mie in spendi
ia
deprec
a
equa!,
else
All
translate differeni countries prices into comparabie terms.
tion of a countrys currency against foreign currencies (a rise in the home cuency
i e.
prices of foreign currencies) makes its exports cheaper and its imports more expens
curren
An appreciatiol? of i(s currency (a fai! in the home cunency pnces of foreign
cies) makes its exports more expensive and its imports cheaper.
pants
2. Exchange rates are deterrnined in theJoreign eschange ,narket. The major partici
in
ai
financi
k
nonban
ations,
corpor
tionai
interna
in that rnarket are commercia! banks,
the
mar
l
in
roie
pivota
a
play
banks
erciai
stitutions. and nationai central banks. Comm
make
ket because they facilitate the exchange of interest-bearing hank deposits. which
takes
ge
trading
exchan
up the bulk of foreign exchange trading. Even though foreign
logy
n
techno
nicatio
piace in many linancial centers around the world, modem commu
impor
iinks thosc centers together mio a singie market that is open 24 hours a day. An
which parties agree to
,
tant category of foreign exchange trading is/orward tradiig in
t,
exchange currencies 00 some future date at a prenegotiated exchange rate. In contras
opot trades are settled immcdiately.
riately
3. Because the exchange rate is the relative price of two assets, it is most approp
an
is
that
pricing
asset
le
of
princip
thought of as being an asset price itself. The basie
all
ting
evalua
In
power.
sing
assets current value depends on its expected future purcha
the
which
at
rate
the
assei. savers look ai the expected rate of rcturn it offers, that is,
is possible to incas
value of ai investinent in the asset is expected to rise over time. lt
in
tire an assets expected rate of return in differeni ways. each depending on the units
which the assers value is measured. Savers care about an assets expected rea! rate f
tsaac Kieshchelski. and
11 Bruunernieier et li.. iind.. as well as A. Crair Bui-nside, Madia Iiichenbaum.
See
Paper 1-1054. Nalional
Workinr
Tide?
Returis
the
Carry
tu
the
Expbain
Scozia T. Rebebo. Do Peso Prohlens
ttureau of Leonome Research. June 200i.
C HAPTER i -i
347
KEY TERMS
appreciation. p. 322
arbitrage. p. 326
deprecialion, p. 322
exchange rate. p. 320
fore[gn exchange rnarket. p. 324
trward exchange rate. p. 327
PROBLEMS
Du9econIab
1. In Munich a bratwurst costs 5 euros: a hot dog costs S4at Boston
s Fenway Park. At
aii exchange rate of $ 1.05/per euro, what ix the price of a bratwurst in
terrns of a hot
dog? All else equa!, how does this relative price change if the dollar
depreciates to
l.25 ier euro? Compared with the initial situation, has a hot dog becom
e more or
less expertsive relative to a bratwurst?
348
PAT 1
-i
lor
2. A U.S. dollar costs 7.5 Norweg,an kruner, htit the same dollar can he pLirchased
rate?
ge
exehan
frane
Swiss
krone/
gian
I .25 Swiss trancs. What is the Norwe
dullars. The
3. Peiroleum is soli! in a world market .ind iends lo he prieed in U.S.
iuanufaekir
in
tise
tu
Nippon Steel Chemical Group ol Japan must impuri iietroleuin
clepreciates
the
yen
i1s1 and other juodtiets. l1o are its pn)tits afteeted when
ilgai nst lite dullar?
4. Caleulate the dollar rates of relurn un the following asscls:
a. A painhing whose PIee rises lrom $200.000 to $250.000 in a year.
price
b. A bottie of a rare Burgundy. Domaine de la RomaneConti 1978, whose
2014.
and
2013
n
riscs from $255 lo $275 betwee
s is
e. A 10.000 depusil in a London bank in a year when the inlerest rate un pound
per
1.38
tu
pound
$
per
1.50
IO percent and the $IE exchange rate moves from $
pound.
ri if the
5. What would be the real rates of return on the assets in the preceding questio
e in
price chLmges deseribed were accompanicd hy a simtiltanem,s IO pcrcent increas
all dollar priees?
the same,
6. Suppose the dollar interest rate and the pound sterling inlerest rate are
exchange
rium
$/
t
equilih
curren
the
n
n
betwee
5 percent per year. What is the relatio
ge rate,
$/1
exchan
future
ed
expect
the
se
rate and its expected future levei? Suppo
t per
percen
10
tu
rises
t
rate
$ 1.52 per pound, rcmains cunstani as Britains interes
$/
rium
new
equilib
year. lf the U.S. interest rate also remains constant. what is the
exchange rate?
decline in
7. Traders in assel rnarkets suddenly Ieaii that the interesi rate un dollars iil
effect
the near ftiture. Use the diagrammatic analysis of this chapter tu determine the
and
dollar
un
t
rates
inleres
i
curren
ing
assum
rate.
ge
un the curreni dollar/euro exchan
curo deposits do not chaif!e.
foreign cx
8. We noted that we could have developed our diagrarnrnatic analysis of
euro/dollar
the
with
,
Europe
change market equilibrium from the perspeclive of
l
at
vertica
le
R IO indicate
exchange rate Ec,s(= 1/Es,) un the vertical axis. a schedu
g how the
showin
the euro return un curo deposits. and a downwardsloping schedule
of equi
euro return un doliar deposits varies with Ec,s. Derive this alternative picture
ed
libriurn and use it to exarnine the effeet of changes in interest rates and the expect
future exchange rate. Do your answers agree with those we found earlier?
ars
9. The following report appeared in the Neu York Tinies on August 7, 1989 (Doll
Strength a Surprise. j). Dl):
But now the senirnent is that the ecunorny Is heading lor a soft landing. with
the econumy slowing significantly and inflation suhsiding. but without a i-ecession.
This outlook is good for the dollar for two reasons. A soft Janding is not as dis
ruptive as a recession. so the foreign investments that suppuri the dollar are more
likely to continue.
Also, a soft landing would noi force the Federal Reserve tu push interesi rates
re
sharply 1oser io stimulate growth. Falling nterest rates can put downward pressu
Iess
ies
un the dollar hecause they make investmems in dollar-denominated securit
sm
attractive tu lreigners, prompting the selling uf dollars. In addition, the optmi
re
sparked by the expectation of a soft landing can esen offset some of the pressu on
the dollar from lower interest rates.
chaptefs
a. Show how you xould interpret the third paragraph of this report using this
mode! of exchange rate determination.
the
h. What additional factors in exchange rate determination rnight help you explain
second paragraph?
F HA PTL R
.--
-.
1 4
li in
Itt.%
it
IO. Suppose the dol lar exehange rales ol the euri and the yen are equally
variable. The
euro. however. tends io depreeiate unexpcctedly againsi the doliar when the
return un
the lesi of vour wealth is unexpectedly high. while the yen tends tu apprec
iate unex
pectedly in the sanie circumstances. As a U.S. resident, which curren
cy. the euro or
the yen. would yoii consider riskier?
11. Does any ol the diseussion in this chapter Iead you tu believe that dollar
deposits may
have Iiquidity charaeteristics different from those of other currency
deposits? If so,
Iiow wonld the ditThrences afict the inlerest diferential hetween,
say, dollar and
Mexican peso deposiis? I)o you have any guesses ahout how
the liquidity of euro
(Ieposits niay be ehanging over time?
12. In October 1979. the U.S. central hank (the Federal Reserve System
) announced it
would play a less aclive mie in limiting 1uctuations in dollar inteies
t rates. After this
new policy was put into effect. the doilars exchange rates against foreign curren
cies
became more volatile. Does our analysis of the foreign exchange rnarke
t suggest any
connection between thcse two events?
13. Imagine that everyone in the world pays a mx of T percent on interest earning
s and on
any capital gains due tu exchange rate changes. How would such a tax aiter the
analy
sis of the interest
condition? How does your answer change if the tax applies to
interest earnings hut no! tu capital gains, which are untaxed?
14. Suppose the one-year Corward $/ exchange rate is $ 1 26 per euro and
the spot
exchange rate is $ 1.2 per euro. What is the forward prernium on euros (the forwar
d
discount un dollars)? What is the difference hetween the interest rate on
one-year
dollar deposits and that oti one-year euro deposits (assuming no repayment
risk)?
15. Europes singie currency. the euro. was introduced in January 1999.
replacing the
currencies of Il European Union members, including France, Germa
ny, Italy, and Spain
(hut not Britain; sec Chapter 20). Do you think that. inimediateiy after the euros
intro
duction. the value of lreign exchange trading in euros was greater or less
than the euro
value of the pre 1999 irade in the 11 origina) national cuiTencies? Explain your
answer.
16. Multinationals generally bave production plants in a number of countries. Conse
quently,
they can move production from expensive locations tu cheaper ones in respon
se tu vari
ous economie developmentsa phenomenon called outsoinving when a domes
tically
based lrm moves part of its production abroad. If the dollar depreciates. what
would
you expect to happen lo outsourcing b American compames? Explain and provid
e an
example.
FURTHER READINGS
Sani Y. Cross. Ali ilboiti 1/le Foreign E.vc/;an. Mai*et in the United Staws. New York:
Fedcral
Reserve Bank of New York. 1998. Prinier on the niarkct.
Fcderat Reserve Bank of New York. The iasic-s 0/ Foreign Tiutie and
Exchwo,1. ai http://www
.ny.frb.org/education/fx/index.html. Broad-ranging but highly accessible accoun
t ot exchange
markets and their rote. Also supplies many uselul Web links.
Philipp I-lartniann. Currenr Competinon and Forcign EcIiangc ,Wa*eis: The Do/im;
the Yen md the
Euro. Cambridee: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Thcoreticai and empirical micro-orienie
d
study of the tole of internationai currencies in ;ortd trade and assct markets.
John Maynard Keynes. A Traci on Moneta;) Reftrin, Chapter 3. London: MacMillan,
1923. Ciassic
anaiysis of the forward exchange markei. and covered interest parity.
Paui R. Kmgman. The Intemational Role ol the Doliar: Thcory arai Prospect, in
John E O. Bilson and
RichardC. Marston. eds. Evehwi,c Rate Theorv and Practku. Chicago: University ot
Chicago Press.
1984, pp. 26 1278. Theoretical and empiricai anaiysis of the doilars position asanin
ternationai
money.
350
PAPT TH REE
I v ich Infrrmiti,nul Jimuic 1(11 Mu,leis: Prh c.t miti Pulii ics. 2nd ed i ion Boston: I rwi n
I uens oli i Ie li min eXcli;ine
McGraw I-i 1. 201)1 Chapieis 35 (ti this Ci tiuprchensive
Richaid M
iriarket
Press, 2001
Rielard K. Lyons. The Mhms!,uciu,e Appiom li io Lxeiu,,,t,e R.uh. Cambridge: Mli
cxcliange
ktreign
0w
m:irkets
oF
nie
struci
ti
the
ne
un
ise
trcat
\dvanced
Ronaid I Me Kinnon Minie in hiuj,iniicnujl E.vchn,,t: un (o,iie,iihle ( urri,ii .StNh,,,. New
the
Yoik: Oxtrd Universiiy Press, l91) Theureticat and nsiiiiitktiial aiialysis ol the piace (ti
ions.
Ioreign exehange markct ti inLernal ional monetary relai
Foieign
Michael Mussa. Empirica! Regu Lirii ies in the I3eliavior of Ixchaiige Rates and I heories o! the
cmd
Pritev
,
iet
Eniiovnieii
/r
eds.
Pulii
Meltier.
lan
i-I.
Exehange Markei. n Karl Brunner and AI
North
Amsterdam:
Il.
Policy
Publie
on
Series
Conierenee
ochester
L.v(ha,l,i,( Raies, CarnegieR
rate
I-lotiand, )79. pp. 9_57. Fxamines the empirica! basis oF the assct price approaeh io exchange
determinaI mn
Risk.
David Sawyer. Continuous Linked Seitlemeni (CLS) ami Foreign Exchange Settietueni
and
of
functioning
the
Descrihes
Finiineiul Siohilitv RLiico 17 ( December 2004), p 5692.
exehange
loreign
of
settlement
rapid
0w
rationale 0w the Coniinuous Linked Seitlement system
transactions.
jiieconIab
volli
sec
\
liov il vorks.
\\.llIOHLIh
\ (tU ire
APPENDIX
T1J
14
CHAPTER
351
352
FAi1 THREE
Exchangc Ratcs
514
I? (E
The quantily
Eq )/Es,:
dis
is cal]ecl the fnirard premino? on euros against doliars. (lt is aiso calicd the flirnard
interest
eovered
the
state
colli?! on dollars against euros.) Using this terrninology, ve can
ivte O??
parity condition as lollows: Thc interest la/e on dal/ar depovits equals I/le i Uerest
on
di,vcounl
(1111 tonlard
CUPO dIdpoviIs p/u.c the fornard prenulini on eiiro.s aiunv1 cloI/arv
clollars againsi CIIPOS).
for
There is strong empirical evidence that the covered interest parity condition holds
currency
Indeed,
center.
financial
singie
a
within
issued
dilYerent foreign currency dcposits
interest nites
traders often set the torward exchange rates they quote by iooking al current
12
from
Deviations
formula.
prity
and spot exchange rates and using the coveied interest
in
iocated
are
compared
covered interest parity can occur. however, if the deposits being
may
governments
different countries. These deviations occur when asset hoiders fear that
nationai
impose reguiations that wili prevent the free movement of foreign funds across
there
borders. Our derivation of the covered interest parity condition imp]icitiy assumed
banks
that
fears
oF
because
also
occur
can
Deviations
kind.
was no politica! risk of this
wiil fai!. making them unable lo pay off large deposits.
By comparing the (noncovered) i nterest parity cond ition.
5
R
1
R + (E
true at
with the covei-ec interesi parity condition, you wilI lnd that hoth conditions can be
exchange
the sarne time only if the one-vear forward $/ rate quoted today equals the spot
rate ieople expect Lo matenalize a year from today:
F
a date in
This makes intuitive sense. When two parties agree to trade foreign exchange un
on that
prevali
to
expect
the
rate
the future, the exchange rate they agree on is the spot
be
should
transactions
date. The irnportant dilference between covered and noncovered
whereas
risk,
rate
kept in mmd. however. Covered Lransactions do not involve exchange
14
noncovered transactions do.
is pro ided b Frank McCormick in
12 evdence supportin1 the covered intere? parlly condition
Empirical
PoIitcal Econoon 87 (Aprii 1979).
o/
.hurnul
Commcnt,
Prolits
Unexpioited
Arbitragc-:
Interest
Covered
Interesi Arbitra_ce: Theor and
Covered
md
Costs
pp. 411417. and 1y Kevin Clinton in Transaction
358370.
i9$8.
pp.
96
(Aprii
Lconono
ical
1i idence. Juurnal of Poli
rarket, sec Rohert Z .Aliber,
For a more detaiied diseussion ot the mie ol politicai risk in the forward exchange
13
eceniber 1973).
81
(November/D
Lio,u;n
oJPolil,ccil
Jounial
tion,
The interesi Parity Theorem: A Reintcrpret:i
inovenient can uso cause
er
mone)
cio.shord
00
retnction
iovemment
uclual
coerse.
01
.
14511459
C IAPTER
1 4
Exchame R.ites
atRi
353
The theorv of covered inieresi par)Iy helps expiai the eluse correla
tiun helween the
mo\emenis in spoi and IorwnL1 exchange rates shown iii Figure 141
a correlation typical
ol all major cLirrencies. The unexpccwd economie events (hai afTect expcc(
e(l aSse( returns
ohcn have a rciatively sinai) efFeci on internatiotial interest rate di tTeren
ces between
deposits with short malurities (for example. three nonths). Tu nainta
in covercd interesi
parity, lherelore. spot and forward nitcs br the corresponding maturi
tics musi change
roughIy in proportion tu each other.
Wc conclude this appendix viili one luriher application o) the covere
d inicresi parity
condition. To illustrate the role ol borward exchange rales, the chapte
r used the example of
an Arnerican importer ol .lapanese radios anxious about the $N exchan
ge rate it wouid
lice in 30 days when the time carne to pay the supplier. In the examp
ie, Radio
Shack
solved the prohlem by seliing forward for yen enough dollars tu cover
the cost of the
radios. But Radio Shack could have solved the prohlem in a different,
more compiieated
way. It could have (1) borrowed dollars from a hank; (2) sold those dollars
immediately
for yen ai the spot exehangc rate and piacerI the ycn in a 30day yen hank
deposit; (3) then,
afier 30 days, used the proceeds ol the maturing yen deposii to pay the Japane
se supplier;
and (41 used the realized proceeds of the U.S. radio sa)es. less prolts. io repav
the origina)
dollar loan.
Which course of actionthe forward ruiciiase o! yen or the sequence of
four transac
tions described in the preceding paragraphis more profitable for the import
er? We leave
it to you. as an exercise, tu show that the two strategies yield the same prott
when the
covered interest parity condition ho]ds.