0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
37 просмотров1 страница
This document provides the rationale for an artifact submitted for INTASC Standard #7 on planning instruction. The artifact is a midterm case study from an Educational Psychology course where the student observed, interviewed, and assessed a child to apply concepts around cognitive, emotional, social, and physical development. The rationale explains that through this case study, the student demonstrated understanding of Standard #7 by assessing mock students, choosing instructional strategies to meet individual needs, and employing learning theory and child development knowledge to make recommendations.
This document provides the rationale for an artifact submitted for INTASC Standard #7 on planning instruction. The artifact is a midterm case study from an Educational Psychology course where the student observed, interviewed, and assessed a child to apply concepts around cognitive, emotional, social, and physical development. The rationale explains that through this case study, the student demonstrated understanding of Standard #7 by assessing mock students, choosing instructional strategies to meet individual needs, and employing learning theory and child development knowledge to make recommendations.
This document provides the rationale for an artifact submitted for INTASC Standard #7 on planning instruction. The artifact is a midterm case study from an Educational Psychology course where the student observed, interviewed, and assessed a child to apply concepts around cognitive, emotional, social, and physical development. The rationale explains that through this case study, the student demonstrated understanding of Standard #7 by assessing mock students, choosing instructional strategies to meet individual needs, and employing learning theory and child development knowledge to make recommendations.
The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teachers and learners decision making. Name of Artifact: Educational Psychology Midterm Case Study Date: February 2016 Course: EDUC 250 Educational Psychology Brief Description: In this assignment, I was required to directly observe, interview, and assess the cognitive, emotional/social, and physical capabilities of one child aged 3-6 or 7-10 year old and apply concepts from respective chapters in Ormrod Educational Psychology. In addition to interviewing the childs parent(s) and gain permission from the parent(s) to assess the child. Rationale: To document my understanding of INTASC Standard #7: Planning for instruction, I have selected to include my Educational Psychology Midterm Case Study. During this case study I was required to assess individual in groups of pretend students and choose appropriate instructional strategies to meet the learning needs of each student in the classroom. I also had to employ learning theory, as well as knowledge about child development and learner differences to make instructional recommendations.