Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 23 June 2008
Received in revised form 23 July 2008
Accepted 7 August 2008
Available online 14 September 2008
Keywords:
Reactive powder concrete
Fly ash
Ground granulated blast furnace slag
Silica fume
Toughness
a b s t r a c t
Mechanical properties (compressive strength, exural strength, and toughness) of reactive powder concrete (RPC) produced with class-C y ash (FA) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) were
investigated under different curing conditions (standard, autoclave and steam curing) in this study. Test
results indicate that, compressive strength of RPC increased considerably after steam and autoclaving
compared to the standard curing. On the other hand, it was observed that steam and autoclave curing
decreased the exural strength and toughness. Increasing the GGBFS and/or FA content improved the
toughness of RPC under all curing regimes considerably. Furthermore, SEM micrographs revealed dense
microstructure of RPC.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Reactive powder concrete (RPC) is a new generation concrete
and it was developed through microstructure enhancement techniques for cementitious materials. As compared to ordinary cement-based materials, the primary improvements of RPC include
the particle size homogeneity, porosity, and microstructures. The
mechanical properties that can be achieved include the compressive strength of the range between 200 and 800 MPa, fracture energy of the range between 1200 and 40,000 J/m2, and ultimate
tensile strain at the order of 1% [1,2]. This is generally achieved
by micro-structural engineering approach, including elimination
of the coarse aggregates, reducing the water-to-cementitious
material ratio, lowering the CaO to SiO2 ratio by introducing the
silica components, and incorporation of steel micro-bers [3]. It
was reported that RPC has a remarkable exural strength and very
high ductility. Its ductility is about 250 times higher than that of
conventional concrete [1,2]. Low permeability, dense micro-structure and superior mechanical properties (very high compressive
strength, exural strength, fracture energy and toughness) dene
the RPC as an ultra-high performance concrete [4]. Nowadays,
RPC seems to be a promising material for special pre-stressed
and precast concrete members. This material can therefore be used
for industrial and nuclear waste storage facilities [14]. Although
production costs of RPC are generally high, some economical
advantages also exist in RPC applications. It is possible to reduce
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 232 4127044; fax: +90 232 4127253.
E-mail address: halit.yazici@deu.edu.tr (H. Yazc).
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.003
1224
costs, but also has negative effects on the heat of hydration and
may cause shrinkage problems. Mineral admixtures can be a feasible solution to overcome these problems in RPC. The main
objective of this research is to determine the effect of mineral
admixtures on the mechanical properties of the RPC. Furthermore,
this research aimed to reduce consumption of cement and silica
fume in order to lower the material costs and to decrease the negative impacts (heat of hydration, shrinkage and environmental
problems). Portland cement and silica fume was replaced with
GGBFS and/or FA at different proportions and mechanical performance determined after different curing regimes. Test results
indicate that low cement RPC has satisfactory performance compared to the conventional RPC the matrix phase of which consist
of cement and silica fume. In other words, it seems that greening
the RPC is also possible using with high amount of mineral
admixtures.
2. Experimental
Table 2
Mixture proportions of RPC
Material
3
Cement (kg/m )
SF (kg/m3)
GGBFS (kg/m3)
FA (kg/m3)
13 mm Quartz (kg/m3)
0.51 mm Quartz (kg/m3)
00.4 mm Quartz (kg/m3)
Water (kg/m3)
SP (L/ m3)
Water from SP
Water/cement
Water/powder
Water/powdera
CaO (Mol)
SiO2 (Mol)
Steel ber (kg/m3)
Flow table (mm)
Molar CaO/SiO2
a
The RPC considered here is prepared by the following ingredients: Ordinary Portland cement (CEM-I 42.5-R); quartz powder
(00.4 mm) and quartz sand (0.51.0 and 1.03.0 mm, with a specic gravity of 2.65), silica fume (SF), a polycarboxylate-based
superplasticizer (SP) in conformity with ASTM C 494-81 type F
and brass-coated steel micro-bers (6 mm long with the diameter
of 0.15 mm, the aspect ratio and tensile strength of the bers is 40
and 2250 MPa, respectively). The physical, chemical and mechanical properties of cement, silica fume, y ash and slag are presented
in Table 1.
Table 2 summarizes the mixture designs of RPC produced in
this study. As can be seen from Table 2, abbreviations were used
for mixtures according to GGBFS and/or FA content. FA and
GGBFS were denoted by F and G. FA or GGBFS ratios by cement
weight were also given in the abbreviations. For instance,
G10F20 means cement was replaced with 10% GGBFS and 20%
Table 1
Physical, chemical and mechanical properties of cement, silica fume, y ash and slag
Chemical composition (%)
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Na2O
K2O
SO3
Cl
L.O.I.
I.R.
F.CaO (%)
Cement
Slag (GGBFS)
20.10
5.62
2.17
62.92
1.14
0.30
0.85
2.92
0.001
3.84
0.63
0.52
92.26
0.89
1.97
0.49
0.96
0.42
1.31
0.33
0.09
42.10
19.40
4.60
27.00
1.80
1.10
2.40
1.30
4.30
39.66
12.94
1.58
34.20
6.94
0.20
1.44
0.72
1.20
3.13
130
210
1.00
Specic surface(m2/kg)
Cement (Blaine)
SF (nitrogen Ab.)
FA (Blaine)
GGBFS (Blaine)
380
20,000
290
396
29.9
43.2
51.9
CTRL
G10F10
G10F20
G10F30
F20
G40
830
291
489
244
244
151
55
33
0.18
0.13
0.16
9.40
7.22
234
115
1.30
664
205
83
83
521
260
260
151
35
21
0.23
0.15
0.17
8.38
6.43
234
115
1.30
581
157
83
166
534
266
266
151
34
20
0.26
0.15
0.17
7.82
6.00
234
113
1.30
498
141
83
249
530
264
264
151
33
20
0.30
0.16
0.18
7.27
6.06
234
113
1.20
664
195
166
516
257
257
151
38
23
0.23
0.15
0.17
8.29
6.36
234
114
1.30
498
173
332
541
269
269
151
35
21
0.30
0.15
0.17
7.55
6.29
234
117
1.20
FA. Moreover CTRL shows Portland cement RPC that contain only
cement and SF as a binder without FA or GGBFS. Replacement ratios presented here were chosen according to results of previous
study [9].
For each type of the proposed mixture proportions of RPC, dry
ingredients (i.e. cement, SF, FA and GGBFS, quartz powders, quartz
sand and silica fume) were rst mixed for about 3 min at low and
high speed in Hobart mixer. Water and superplasticizer were
added and re-mixed for about 5 min at high speed. Subsequently,
bers were added and additional mixing was applied for about
2 min. The specimens were kept in the moulds for 16 h at room
temperature of about 20 C. After that RPC specimens were removed from the steel molds. One-third of the RPC specimens were
cured in water at 20 C. The other one-third of specimens were
autoclaved under 2.0 MPa pressure for 8 h (210 C). Temperature
and pressure reached to their maximum values in 2.5 h. Remaining specimens were exposed to steam curing at 100 C for 3 days.
Heating rate of steam cure treatment was 11 C/h. This extended
(3 days) high temperature (100 C) steam curing which is different from conventional curing process were preferred due to the
high amount of reactive cementitious materials in RPC. Studies
showed that high mechanical properties can be achieved under
these conditions at early ages [13]. Cwirzen et al. [10] also indicated that heat treatment densied the microstructure of the RPC
matrix. The specimens, which were subjected to heat treatment,
were kept in laboratory conditions for cooling before testing in
this study.
Prismatic specimens (40 40 160 mm) were used to determine the exural strength and toughness. Flexural specimens were
tested at the loading rate of 0.1 mm/min up to mid-span deection
of 2.5 mm under closed loop control test procedure. The specimens
were loaded from their mid span and the clear distance between
simple supports was 130 mm. Toughness was regarded as the area
under the loaddeection curve up to 2.5 mm mid-span deection.
The compressive strength test was performed following to the exural tests. The two broken pieces left from exural test were subjected to compressive strength test. The loaded area under
compressive strength test is 40 40 mm and the height of the
specimens is also 40 mm. The moduli of elasticity values were
determined on 100 200 mm cylinders. Each data presented here
are the average test results of three specimens. On the other hand,
exural loaddeection curves were drawn using with one specimen graph that represents closest to the average mechanical
performance.
1225
In water (2 days)
Steam curing
300
273
280
270
268
261
255
260
261
259
252
250
249
234
240
220
212
207
202
210
206
200
200
180
163
160
149
143
141
140
131
116
120
100
CTRL
G10F10
G10F20
G10F30
F20
Mixtures
Fig. 1. The inuence of GGBFS and/or FA content and curing regime on compressive strength.
G40
1226
paste and limit the particle size of hydrates that known as a space
lling effect [22].
Preliminary test results [9] showed that GGBFS and/or FA can be
used as an alternative ne silica sources in this study. Due to this
nding SF content of the mixtures presented here was decreased
with increasing mineral admixtures content. Test results also
showed that decreasing the SF content also decreased the SP demand considerably. In other words, using the GGBFS and/or FA as
a silica source in the RPC has many benecial affects (economy,
decreasing shrinkage, heat of hydration, etc.). It can be seen that
from Table 2, SF content was reduced with the increasing GGBFS
and/or FA replacement. SiO2 and CaO contents were calculated
for each ingredient. SF content has been calculated to keep the molar CaO/SiO2 ratio constant (1.201.30). Molar ratio of 1.30 was
chosen for less than 40% replacement level and 1.20 for 40%
replacement level according to the preliminary tests. For example,
SF content of control mixture is 291 kg/m3 and 141 kg/m3 for
G10F30 mixture. As can be seen in Fig. 1, decreasing SF content
with increasing mineral admixture replacement generally did not
cause mechanical properties loss.
50
In water (2 days)
45
Steam curing
Autoclave curing
38,7
40
35,5
34,6
33,9
35
30,7
28,6
30
31,8 31,2
30,7
30,2
23
23,4
33,8
31,8
29,5
28,6
26,3
25
34,5
32,8
26,1
24,2
23,3
22,7
22,3
20
15
10
5
0
CTRL
G10F10
G10F20
G10F30
F20
Mixtures
Fig. 2. The inuence of GGBFS and/or FA content and curing regime on exural strength.
G40
1227
10000
9000
G 10F30
8000
7000
Load, N
6000
CTRL
5000
G40
4000
F20
3000
2000
1000
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Displacement, mm
Fig. 3. The loaddisplacement relationship of 2-day water cured mixtures according to the GGBFS and/or FA content.
13000
G10F30
12000
11000
F20
10000
9000
Load, N
8000
7000
G40
6000
5000
CTRL
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Displacement, mm
Fig. 4. The loaddisplacement relationship of 28-day water cured mixtures according to the GGBFS and/or FA content.
1228
11000
10000
9000
8000
F20
G10F30
Load, N
7000
6000
CTRL
5000
G40
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Displacement, mm
Fig. 5. The loaddisplacement relationship of steam cured mixtures according to the GGBFS and/or FA content.
14000
12000
G10F30
10000
F20
Load, N
8000
G40
6000
CTRL
4000
2000
0
0
0.5
1.5
2.5
Displacement, mm
Fig. 6. The loaddisplacement relationship of autoclave cured mixtures according to the GGBFS and/or FA content.
1229
Toughness of mixtures after different curing conditions is presented in Fig. 7. GGBFS and/or FA replacement generally positively
affected the toughness in all curing regimes. This behavior can be
attributed to the improvement in bond strength between matrix
phase and bers. Toughness values increased 1846% according
to mineral admixture replacement compared to the Portland cement RPC under standard curing. This ratio is between 2444%
for steam curing and 2339% for autoclaving. In other words, using
GGBFS and/or FA improved the toughness of RPC considerably. The
other factor which affects the toughness of RPC is curing regime.
The maximum toughness performance was observed from standard water curing for both Portland cement RPC and RPC containing mineral admixtures. While compressive strength of autoclaved
and steam cured specimens were considerably higher than standard cured ones, the highest toughness values were determined
after the 28-day standard curing. Steam curing reduced the toughness compared to the 28-day standard curing. This decrement is
between 10% and 34% according to mixture type. On the other
hand, autoclaving slightly reduced the toughness compared to
the 28-day standard curing. In this case decrement ratio is between
4% and 18%. This behavior is probably due to the weaker bond between the bers and matrix after steam curing and autoclaving
[16]. It is obvious that steam curing cause much more bond
strength loss than autoclaving in RPC.
3.3. Inuence of the GGBFS and/or FA replacement on modulus of
elasticity of RPC
Moduli of elasticity of some selected autoclaved mixtures were
determined and are shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen that modulus of
elasticity of RPC decreased slightly when the replacement level
reached to 30%. This can be attributed to the decreasing compressive
strength level. The maximum decrement (18%) was observed in 40%
GGBFS replacement compared to the control mixture. Decrement in
modulus of elasticity values was also reported for high strength concrete containing mineral admixtures by Nassif et al. [23].
3.4. Microstructure of RPC
Microstructure of the selected RPC mixtures has been investigated by using JEOL JSM 6060 electron microscope (SEM). The
In water (2 days)
Steam curing
20000
19000
Toughnesss, N.mm
18000
17000
16000
15000
14000
13000
12000
11000
10000
9000
CTRL
G10F10
G10F20
G10F30
F20
Mixtures
Fig. 7. The inuence of GGBFS and/or FA content and curing regime on toughness of RPC.
G40
1230
60
57
56
55
53
50
49
50
46
45
40
35
30
Control
F20
G10F10
G10F20
G10F30
G40
Mixtures
Fig. 8. The effect of GGBFS and/or FA content on the moduli of elasticity of the mixtures (autoclave curing).
Fig. 9. SEM images of (a) autoclaved control mixture (pores in the matrix) (b) steam cured F10G20 mixture (pores in the matrix).
Fig. 10. SEM images of autoclaved (a) control mixture (spherical pores lled with jennite-like structures) (b) F20 mixture needle-like tobermorite.
that Ca/Si, S/Ca and Al/Ca ratios of this type of jennite are 1.85,
0.003 and 0.036, respectively. EDS analysis in FA mixture showed
that Ca/Si, S/Ca and Al/Ca ratios of this type of tobermorite are
1.02, 0.03 and 0.05, respectively.
4. Conclusions
Test results showed that RPC containing high volume mineral
admixtures have satisfactory mechanical performance. Although
the cement and silica fume contents of these mixtures importantly
lower than conventional RPC, compressive strength exceeded
200 MPa after standard water curing. Autoclave and steam curing
seems very effective ways to increase the compressive strength
of RPC. This can be attributed to the improvement of hydration
process under these curing regimes. In this case compressive
strength is over 234 MPa after steam curing and greater than
250 MPa after autoclaving. Furthermore, these mixtures have also
important environmental benets. Decreasing cement content reduces heat of hydration and shrinkage which are normally important problems for conventional RPC.
On the other hand, steam and autoclave curing caused some
reduction in exural strength compared to the 28-day standard
curing. This is probably due to the decreasing bond strength between matrix and bers. This behavior is much more important
in steam curing than autoclaving. GGBFS and/or FA replacement
decreased this negative effect in both steam and autoclaving.
GGBFS and/or FA improved the exural performance of RPC under
all curing regimes. Toughness values increased importantly using
with these mineral powders.
Test results showed that GGBFS and/or FA can also be used as a
ne silica source for RPC. In other words, SF can also be reduced by
increasing GGBFS and/or FA content. This gives also important
advantages (economy, reduced heat of hydration, shrinkage and
superplasticizer demand) like cement replacement.
Mineral admixtures decreased the modulus of elasticity of RPC
especially over 30% replacement levels. Although some spherical
entrained air pores exist, SEM investigations revealed the dense
microstructure of RPC. Tobermorite- and jennite-like structures
were observed in autoclaved specimens.
Acknowledgements
This study is a part of the project supported by the Scientic
_
and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TBITAK,
Project
_
No.: 104I085). The authors gratefully acknowledge to TBITAK.
In addition, the authors thank to Mr. Mehmet Yerlikaya from BEKSA-DRAMIX, Mr. Okan Duyar from BASF-YKS and Mr. Hakan
_
Senvardarli from KARIMSA
for materials support.
References
[1] Richard P, Cheyrezy M. Composition of reactive powder concretes. Cement
Concr Res 1999;25:150111.
1231
[2] Richard P, Cheyrezy MH. Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and
200800 MPa compressive strength. ACI SP144-24 1994;144:50718.
[3] Chan YW, Chu SH. Effect of silica fume on steel ber bond characteristics in
reactive powder concrete. Cement Concr Res 2004;34:116772.
_
[4] Gvensoy G, Bayramov F, Ilki
A, S
engl C, Tasdemir MA, Kocatrk AN, et al.
Mechanical behavior of high performance steel ber reinforced cementitious
composites under cyclic loading condition, ultra high performance concrete
(UHPC). In: International symposium on ultra high performance concrete,
September 1315; 2004. p. 64960.
[5] Massidda L, Sanna U, Cocco E, Meloni P. High pressure steam curing of
reactive-powder mortars, ACI SP200-27, 2001;200:44764.
[6] Shaheen E, Shrive N. Optimization of mechanical properties and durability of
reactive powder concrete. ACI Mater J 2006;103:44451.
[7] Rougeau P, Borys B. Ultra high performance concrete with ultrane particles
other than silica fume. Ultra high performance concrete (UHPC). In:
International symposium on ultra high performance concrete, September
1315; 2004. p. 21325.
[8] Kejin W, Zhi G. Evaluating properties of blended cements for concrete
pavements. Final report. Center for Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
Technology: Iowa State University; 2003.
[9] Yazc H, Yigiter H, Karabulut AS, Baradan B. Utilization of y ash and ground
granulated blast furnace slag as an alternative silica source in reactive powder
concrete. Fuel 2008;87:24017.
[10] Cwirzen A, Penttala V, Vornanen C. Reactive powder based concretes:
mechanical properties, durability and hybrid use with OPC. Cement Concr
Res, in press. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.013.
[11] Basheer PAM, Gilleece PRV, Long AE, McCarter WJ. Monitoring electrical
resistance of concretes containing alternative cementitious materials to assess
their resistance to chloride penetration. Cement Concr Compos
2002;24:43749.
[12] Pal SC, Mukherjee A, Pathak SR. Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground
granulated blast furnace slag in concrete. Cement Concr Res 2003;33:14816.
[13] Bosch VDV. Performance of mortar specimens in chemical and accelerated
marine exposure. Performance of concrete in marine environment. ACI SP-65
1980;487507.
[14] Roy DM, Idorn GM. Hydration, structure and properties of blast furnace slag
cements, mortars and concrete. ACI J 1982;6:4457.
[15] Zhanga Y, Sun W, Liu S. Study on the hydration heat of binder paste in highperformance concrete. Cement Concr Res 2002;32:14838.
[16] Neville AM. Properties of concrete. New York: Longman; 1995.
[17] Mindess S, Young JF, Darwin D. Concrete. New Jersey: Pearson Education;
2002.
[18] Aldea CM, Young F, Wang K, Shah SP. Effects of curing conditions on properties
of concrete using slag replacement. Cement Concr Res 2000;30:46572.
[19] Shi C, Hu S. Cementitious properties of ladle slag nes under autoclave curing
conditions. Cement Concr Res 2004;33:18516.
[20] Glasser FP, Hong SY. Thermal treatment of CSH gel at 1 bar H2O pressure up
to 200 C. Cement Concr Res 2003;33:2719.
[21] Yang Q, Zhang S, Huang S, He Y. Effect of ground quartz sand on properties of
high-strength concrete in the steam-autoclaved curing. Cement Concr Res
2000;30:19938.
[22] Maeder U, Gamboa IL, Chaigmon J, Lombard JP. Ceracem. A new high
performance concrete: characterizations and applications. Ultra high
performance concrete (UHPC). In: International symposium on ultra high
performance concrete, September 1315; 2004. p. 5968.
[23] Nassif HH, Najm H, Suksawang N. Effect of pozzolanic materials and curing
methods on the elastic modulus of HPC. Cement Concr Compos
2005;27:66170.
[24] Scrivener KL. Backscattered electron imaging of cementitious microstructures:
understanding and quantication. Cement Concr Compos 2004;26:93545.