Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(2016) 110
www.deswater.com
doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1138897
Adsorption of zinc ions on bone char using helical coil-packed bed columns
and its mass transfer modeling
J. Moreno-Pereza, A. Bonilla-Petricioleta,*, C.K. Rojas-Mayorgaa, D.I. Mendoza-Castillob,
M. Masciac, M. Erricod
Downloaded by [Adrian Bonilla-Petriciolet] at 17:20 25 January 2016
ABSTRACT
This study reports the assessment of helical coil-packed bed columns for Zn2+ adsorption
on bone char. Zn2+ adsorption breakthrough curves have been obtained using helical coil
columns with different characteristics and a comparison has been conducted with respect to
the results of straight fixed-bed columns. Results showed that the helical coil adsorption columns may offer an equivalent removal performance than that obtained for the traditional
packed bed columns but using a compact structure. However, the coil diameter, number of
turns, and feed flow appear to be crucial parameters for obtaining the best performance in
this packed-bed geometry. A mass transfer model for a mobile fluid flowing through a porous media was used for fitting and predicting the Zn2+ breakthrough curves in helical coil
bed columns. Results of adsorbent physicochemical characterization showed that Zn2+
adsorption on bone char can be attributed to an ion-exchange mechanism. In summary, helical coil columns appear to be a feasible configuration for large-scale adsorption systems
with high flow rates where a significant reduction on purification system size can be
obtained without compromising the adsorbent performance.
Keywords: Helical coil-packed columns; Adsorption; Bone char; Zinc; Mass transfer model
1. Introduction
Adsorption processes are widely used in industrial
applications including the purification and treatment
of wastewaters and the production of drinking water.
Fixed-bed column is the most common configuration
*Corresponding author.
1944-3994/1944-3986 ! 2016 Balaban Desalination Publications. All rights reserved.
coil diameter
qbchar
coil turns
ttoper
t0
"
Zn2 $feed % Zn2 $outlet
Q dt
mads
(1)
@c
@qbed
r & cu r & DD rc
qb
@t
@t
(2)
@t
@c @t
(3)
e qb Kp
@c
@c
@2c
u
DD 2
@t
@x
@x
c0
c
# cf
@c #
0
3. Results
Fig. 2(a)(f) shows the breakthrough curves of
Zn2+ adsorption on bone char using the helical coil
bed columns for tested feed flows and metal concentrations. The shape and characteristics of the breakthrough curves are functions of these operating
parameters and, consequently, they determine the
dynamic performance of adsorption columns. As
expected, the sharpness of Zn2+ breakthrough curves
increased with feed flow and inlet metal concentration. These results also confirmed that Zn2+ adsorption
breakthrough curves depend on the characteristics of
helical coil columns. Specifically, the coil diameter and
the number of turns affected the performance of metal
adsorption. But, their effects on metal removal depend
on the operating conditions of the bone char columns.
For the lower feed flow, the effect of coil diameter and
turns is more significant especially for the inlet metal
concentrations of 24 and 48 mg/L, see Fig. 2(a) and
(b). Note that helical coil columns with 6 turns (i.e.
with the lower coil diameter) offered the best performance for Zn2+ adsorption on bone char at the lower
feed flow. Breakthrough curves for helical columns
with 6 turns are more delayed and sharper than those
for adsorption columns with 3 turns. But, at the upper
feed flow, the change in coil diameter and turns does
not provide a pronounced effect on the bed metal
uptakes independent of the inlet Zn2+ concentration,
see Figs. 2(d)(f). At this flow condition, breakthrough
curves obtained for different coil turns are practically
(4)
In this model, the parameters Kp and DD are determined via the data fitting of experimental breakthrough curves. The initial and boundary conditions
for this model are [8,20]:
t 0; 0\x\L;
t [ 0; x 0;
t [ 0; x L;
(5)
@x xL
where L is the bed length and cf is the final concentration of outlet column obtained in experimental breakthrough curves. The differential equation governing
the mass transfer in adsorption columns was solved
Table 1
Parameters used in the mass transfer model for breakthrough data correlation of Zn2+ adsorption on bone char
Parameter
Valuea
0.3
1.2
0.9956
0.7982
18
7.1386
65.93
9.16
(a)
[ Zn2 ] outlet
[ Zn2 ] feed
(b)
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
(d)
(c)
10
15
20
25
(e)
12
15
(f)
1
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
6 coil turns
Mass transfer model
0
12
15
0.9
3 coil turns
0
0
12
15
12
15
Time, h
Fig. 2. Breakthrough curves for Zn2+ adsorption on bone char using helical coil-packed columns. Metal concentration and
feed flow: (a) 24 mg/L and 6.5 mL/min, (b) 48 mg/L and 6.5 mL/min, (c) 100 mg/L and 6.5 mL/min, (d) 24 mg/L and
13 mL/min, (e) 48 mg/L, and 13 mL/min, and (f) 100 mg/L and 13 mL/min.
(a)
(b) 1
24 mg/L
0.9
0.9
48 mg/L
0.8
0.8
100 mg/L
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
[Zn ] outlet
[ Zn2 ] feed
10
15
20
25
12
15
Time, h
Fig. 3. Breakthrough curves for Zn2+ adsorption on bone char using conventional (i.e. straight) packed columns. Feed
flow: (a) 6.5 mL/min and (b) 13 mL/min.
Table 2
Breakthrough points, Zn2+ adsorption capacities, and bed utilization for both conventional and helical coil adsorption
columns
Operating conditions
[Zn2+]feed (mg/L)
Bed geometry
w = 0.05
w = 0.10
qbchar (mg/g)
6.5
24
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
4.0
3.5
4.1
1.56
1.25
1.36
0.69
0.45
0.46
4.67
4.17
4.83
1.67
1.33
1.54
0.71
0.50
0.51
4.41
4.19
4.46
4.39
4.13
4.39
5.69
5.78
5.66
19.17
18.22
19.39
19.09
17.96
19.09
24.74
25.13
24.61
1.22
1.07
1.18
0.45
0.42
0.47
0.10
0.17
0.17
1.33
1.22
1.33
0.49
0.46
0.52
0.18
0.18
0.18
5.91
5.82
5.89
4.78
4.9
4.85
5.62
5.69
6.01
25.70
25.30
25.61
20.78
21.30
21.09
24.43
24.74
26.13
48
100
13
24
48
100
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
Table 3
Results of Zn2+ breakthrough data correlation using mass transfer model
Operating conditions
[Zn2+]feed (mg/L)
Bed geometry
6.5
24
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
48
100
13
24
48
100
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
Straight
Helical coil3
Helical coil6
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
turns
DD (cm2/s)
Kp (m3/kg)
R2
155.28
181.41
134.17
199.75
235.43
203.27
389.45
454.77
443.72
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.63
0.63
0.63
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.99
0.99
0.98
0.96
0.99
0.99
0.96
0.97
0.98
179.4
190.45
172.36
176.6
184.42
155.53
377.89
412.56
325.13
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.98
0.98
0.99
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.96
0.95
0.97
(a)
BC
1600
1200
800
400
-1
Wavenumber (cm )
(b)
++
++ + +
++
++
10
20
30
002
310
101
202
002
300
211
Intensity (a.u.)
BC
(c)
+ Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2
BC-Zn
Transmittance (%)
BC-Zn
40
50
2 ()
60
70
80
30
24.4
25 Ca
23.9
Ca 21.7
P
BC
BC-Zn
21.6
P
20
15
10
5
0
9.2
O
9.1
O
0
Zn
0.8
Zn
Fig. 4. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) XRD patterns, and (c) elemental
composition by XRF analysis of bone char samples before
(BC) and after zinc adsorption studies (BC-Zn).
(6)
) OH M2 ) O % M H
(7)
(a)
O-H
531.7 eV
O1s
Intensity (a.u.)
P-O
533.88 eV
BC-Zn
4. Conclusions
O-H
531.6 eV
533.88 eV
538
536
BC
534
532
530
528
526
(b)
P2p
Intensity (a.u.)
P-O
133.28 eV
BC
BC-Zn
135
134
133
132
131
130
(c)
Ca2p
Intensity (a.u.)
CaO
347.78 eV 347.3 eV
BC
BC-Zn
353 352 351 350 349 348 347 346 345 344 343
Binding energy (eV)
(d)
References
ZnO
1022.68 eV
Zn2p
Intensity (a.u.)
133.48 eV
136
BC
BC-Zn
1030
1028
1026
1024
1022
1020
1018
1016
lvarez, J. Garca,
[1] J.L. Sotelo, A. Rodrguez, S. A
Removal of caffeine and diclofenac on activated carbon in fixed bed column, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 90
(2012) 967974.
[2] M.F.F. Sze, V.K.C. Lee, G. McKay, Simplified fixed bed
column model for adsorption of organic pollutants
using tapered activated carbon columns, Desalination
218 (2008) 323333.
[3] O. Allahdin, S.C. Dehou, M. Wartel, P. Recourt, M.
Trentesaux, J. Mabingui, A. Boughriet, Performance
of FeOOH-brick based composite for Fe(II)
removal from water in fixed bed column and
mechanistic aspects, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91 (2013)
27322742.
[4] M.C. Basso, E.G. Cerrella, A.L. Cukierman, Activated
carbons developed from a rapidly renewable biosource
for removal of cadmium (II) and nickel (II) ions from
dilute aqueous solutions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41
(2002) 180189.
10
[5] L. Li, X. Li, J.Y. Lee, T.C. Keener, Z. Liu, X. Yao, The
effect of surface properties in activated carbon on
mercury adsorption, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012)
91369144.
[6] M.R. Moreno-Virgen, R. Tovar-Gomez, D.I. MendozaCastillo, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet, Applications of activated carbons obtained from lignocellulosic materials
for the wastewater treatment, in: V. Hernandez-Montoya, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet (Eds.), Lignocellulosic Precursors used in the Synthesis of Activated Carbon:
Characterization Techniques and Applications in the
Wastewater Treatment, first ed., 2012, Intech, 5775.
[7] P.G. Gonzalez, Y.B. Pliego-Cuervo. Adsorption of Cd(II),
Hg(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution using mesoporous activated carbon produced from Bambusa vulgaris striata, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92 (2014) 27152724.
[8] I. Park, K.S. Knaebel, Adsorption breakthrough behavior: Unusual effects and possible causes, AIChE J. 38
(1992) 660670.
[9] R. Tovar-Gomez, M.R. Moreno-Virgen, J.A. DenaAguilar, V. Hernandez-Montoya, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet,
M.A. Montes-Moran, Modeling of fixed-bed adsorption of fluoride on bone char using a hybrid neural
network approach, Chem. Eng. J. 228 (2013) 1098
1109.
[10] A.A. Pota, A.P. Mathews, Adsorption dynamics in a
stratified convergent tapered bed, Chem. Eng. Sci. 55
(2000) 13991409.
[11] M.F.F. Sze, G. McKay, Enhanced mitigation of parachlorophenol using stratified activated carbon adsorption columns, Water Res. 46 (2012) 700710.
[12] M.F.F. Sze, G. McKay, Adsorptive removal of parachlorophenol using stratified tapered activated carbon
column, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 20 (2012) 444454.
[13] H. Saffari, R. Moosavi, N.M. Nouri, C.X. Lin, Prediction of hydrodynamic entrance length for single and
two-phase flow in helical coils, Chem. Eng. Process.
Process Intensif. 86 (2014) 921.
[14] S.A. Nosier, M.M. Mohamed, Mass transfer at helical
coils in bubble columns, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 18
(2004) 235239.
[15] I.A. Aguayo-Villarreal, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet, V.
Hernandez-Montoya, M.A. Montes-Moran, H.E.
Reynel-Avila, Batch and column studies of Zn2+
removal from aqueous solution using chicken feathers
as sorbents, Chem. Eng. J. 167 (2011) 6776.
[16] O. Abdelwahab, N.K. Amin, E.S.Z. El-Ashtoukhy,
Removal of zinc ions from aqueous solution using a
cation exchange resin, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91 (2013)
165173.
[17] D.I. Mendoza-Castillo, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet, J. Jauregui-Rincon, On the importance of surface chemistry
and composition of bone char for the sorption of
heavy metals from aqueous solution, Desalin. Water
Treat. 54 (2015) 16511662.
[18] M. Germano, The Dean equations extended to a helical pipe flow, J. Fluid Mech. 203 (1989) 289305.
[19] M.S. Shafeeyan, W.M.A.W. Wan Daud, A. Shamiri, A
review of mathematical modeling of fixed-bed
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]