Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
3.70 14.0
$1.88 $0.50
2.11
8.0
1.58
6.0
1.06
4.0
$0.75 $0.20
0.53 2.0
$0.38 $0.10
$1.50 $0.40
RO Energy 9 gfd
RO Energy 7.5 gfd
RO Energy 6 gfd
0.0
30%
35%
$1.13 $0.30
40%
45%
50%
$55%
RO Recovery
Note: Treatment costs do not include land, depreciation, distribution improvements, intake capital
costs or owner oversight/management costs, and they assume co-location with an existing power
plant or other existing intake system.
Industry Experts
Test 2 most affordable point
ADC Target Range (4)
CRA(2)
Recycle
RO
S WRO
$/kgal $/m
$3.00 $0.79
$2.25 $0.59
General Perception
1. SWP = California State Water Project; 2. CRA = Colorado River Aqueduct Project; 3. SWP
numbers do not include distribution beyond Castaic Lake or treatment; 4. ADC target range
does not include supply or distribution. I.e. RO process only; 5. Source: Water Sources
Powering Southern California, by Robert C. Wilkinson Ph.D., 01/04
Energy Consumption
3.17 12.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
S WP(1)
$2.63 $0.69
Cost at 6 gfd
Cost at 7.5 gfd
Cost at 9 gfd
2.64 10.0
5.7
3.8
1.9
kWh/m3
Carollo Engineers
FilmTec Corporation
Poseidon Resources
Rolled Alloys
WaterEye