Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 64

Mechanical Systems

FRF

TIME

FRF FRF

TIME

TIME

ζ = 0.1 ζ =0

FRF ζ = 0.3 jω

TIME

ζ = 0.7

ζ = 1.0
TIME σ
ζ > 1.0

Peter Avitabile
TIME

STABLE UNSTABLE

Mechanical Engineering Department


University of Massachusetts Lowell

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 1 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Mechanical Systems-Translational Mass Element
Translation of a particle moving in space due to an
applied force is given by:
dp
f=
dt
Where: f = force
p = momentum = mv
Considering the mass to be constant:
d (mv) dv
f= ⇒ fdt = mdv ⇒ f = m = ma
dt dt

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 2 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Mechanical Systems – Translational Mass Element
Displacement, velocity, and acceleration are all
related by time derivatives as:

dν d 2 x
a= = 2
dt dt

a = v& = &x&

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 3 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Mechanical Systems – Rotational Mass Element

Centroidal mass moment of inertia – Ic (not to be


confused with I – area moment of inertia used in
strength of materials)


Angular acceleration α= =ω
&
dt
where: ω = angular velocity
θ = angular displacement
Then:
dω d 2 θ
α= =
dt dt
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 4 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Mechanical Systems - Translational Spring Element

A linear spring is considered to have no mass


described by:

k
fk fk
x1 x2

f k = kx rel = k (x1 − x 2 )

(Torsional spring follows the same relationship)

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 5 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Translational Spring Element

Hardening Spring
Linear k = lb/in
k = N/m
Softening Spring

Bi-Linear Gap Cubic


f f f

x x x

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 6 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Damper Element
Viscous (fluid), Coulomb (dry friction), and structural
damping (hysteretic)
Viscous Dashpot vrel

f c = cν rel m fa
fc
Coulomb Damper
In order to have motion, the applied force must
overcome the static friction. As soon as sliding occurs,
the dynamic friction becomes appropriate.
fc
Linear f c = c(ν1 − ν 2 )

c c
fc fc
v1 v2
x&
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 7 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Equivalence - Springs in Parallel

f f
x x
k1 k2 keq

Both springs see the same displacement


f f=f1 + f2
f1 f2
keqx=k1x + k2x
f1=k1x f2=k2x =(k1 + k2)x

∴ k eq = k1 + k 2
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 8 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Equivalence - Springs in Series

f=k1(x1-x2)=k1 δ1
f f=keq δ
x k1
x1
k1 f
x2
keq f2=k2x2=k2 δ 2
k2 k2

Both springs see the same force but different displacements


δ = δ1 + δ 2 1 1 1
f f1 f 2 ∴ = +
= + k eq k1 k 2
k eq k1 k 2
k1k 2
But f = f1 = f 2 k eq =
k1 + k 2
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 9 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Translational Systems
Newton’s Second Law- THE RIGHT WAY

∑ Fx = ma x +
∑ F = ma OR
+
∑ Fy = ma y
Note that this applies to the center of mass which is not
necessarily the center of gravity.

Free-Body Diagram & Sign Convention

kx f (t)
m
cx&
x + → x& → &x&
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 10 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Translational Systems – Newton’s 2nd Law
Assume spring and dashpot are stretched
f ( t ) − Fc − Fk = m&x&
∑ Fx = ma x OR
f ( t ) − cx& − kx = m&x&

or in standard input-output differential form


c k f (t)
m&x& + cx& + kx = f ( t ) &x& + x& + x =
m m m
c
ζ= - damping ratio
cc
2
&x& + 2ζωn x& + ωn x = f ( t ) cc = 2mωn – critical damping
k
ωn2 =
m ωn– natural frequency
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 11 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
D’Alembert’s Principle – The Fictitious Force
The mass times acceleration is sometimes described
as a ‘fictitious force’, ‘reverse effective force’ or ‘
‘apparent force’

∑ F + (− ma ) = 0
Initially developed since it looks like a classical
force balance – but often confuses many students.

DO NOT USE D’ALEMBERT!!!!!


USE NEWTON’S SECOND LAW

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 12 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Pendulum Problem
Mass at end of massless string J = ml 2

T
l x+
θ
FBD mg sin θ
mg cos θ
mg mg

J&θ& = − mglsinθ OR ml &θ& + mglsinθ = 0


2

Then && g
for smallθ. → θ + θ = 0
&θ& + g sinθ = 0 l
l Nat’l freq. ωn = lg

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 13 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Differential Equation about Equilibrium

+ Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

y ∑ Fy = ma y Therefore, the equations


− ky + mg = m&y& can be written about the
equilibrium point and the
− k (x st + x ) + mg = m&x& effect of gravity makes
x but mg = kx st no difference.
∴ m&x& + kx = 0
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 14 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Systems with Displacement Input
x
+ ∑ Fx = ma x k
m
c
x y
m x
FBD m
k c k(y − x)
y c( y& − x& )

k (y − x ) + c(y& − x& ) = m&x& OR m&x& + cx& + kx = cy& + ky


In terms of natural
2 2
frequency and damping &x& + 2ζωn x& + ωn x = 2ζω n y& + ωn y
ratio
The force exerted can
be found to be f ( t ) = k (y − x ) + c(y& − x& )

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 15 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Transfer Function and State Space

k
m f(t) m&x& + cx& + kx = f ( t )
c
x

L(m&x&) = s 2 mX(s) − msX 0 − mX& 0 L (kx) = kX ( s )


L (cx& ) = scX ( s ) − cX 0 L ( f (t )) = f ( s )

s 2 mX(s) − msX 0 − mX
& + scX(s) − cX + kX(s) = f (s)
0 0

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 16 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Transfer Function and State Space
Grouping and rearranging:
(ms 2
)
+ cs + k X(s) = f (s) + (ms + c )X 0 + mX
&
0

Assume initial conditions are zero and rearranging


terms to obtain OUT/IN form
Then:
X(s) 1
H(s) = =
F(s) ms 2 + cs + k
Sometimes written with

b(s) = ms 2 + cs + k

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 17 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Frequency Response Function - SDOF
The frequency response function is the system
transfer function evaluated along s = jω
Recall:
1
h (s) =
ms 2 + cs + k

The complex valued


function defines the
surface shown

Source: Vibrant Technology

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 18 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
SDOF – Transfer Function

Polynomial Form 1
h (s) =
ms 2 + cs + k
1/ m
Pole-Zero Form h (s) =
(s − p1 )(s − p1* )

a1 a1*
Partial Fraction Form h (s) = +
(s − p1 ) (s − p1* )

1 −ζωt
Exponential Form h(t) = e sin ωd t
mωd

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 19 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
SDOF – Frequency Response Function

1
Polynomial Form h(jω) =
− mω 2 + cjω + k
1/ m
Pole-Zero Form h ( jω) =
( jω − p1 )( jω − p1* )
a1 a1*
Partial Fraction Form h ( jω) = +
( jω − p1 ) ( jω − p1* )

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 20 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
SDOF – Transfer Function
Transfer Function approach is used extensively in
design but is limited to linear, time-invariant systems.

1. T.F. – method to express output relative to input


2. T.F. – system property – independent of the nature
of excitation
3. T.F. contains necessary units but does not provide
physical structure of system
4. If T.F. is known, then response can be evaluated
due to various inputs
5. If T.F. is unknown, it can be established
experimentally by measuring output response due to
known measured inputs

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 21 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
S-plane Plots

FRF

TIME

FRF FRF

TIME

TIME

ζ = 0.1 ζ =0

FRF ζ = 0.3 jω

TIME

ζ = 0.7

ζ = 1.0
TIME σ

ζ > 1.0

TIME

STABLE UNSTABLE

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 22 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Experimental Determination of Damping Ratio
x1 x2
Determine decay of amplitude xn
x1 at t1 and again at n cycles t1 t2 tn
later xn at t1 + (n-1)T T - period

Then x e −ζω t 1 n
1
= −ζω (t +T ) = −ζω T = e ζω T n

x2 e e n n

OR
x1 1
= −ζω (n −1)T = e (n −1)ζω T n

xn e n

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 23 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Log Decrement

 x1  1  x1 
ln  = ln  = ζω n T
 x 2  n −1  x n 
2π 2πζ Note: This damping
= ζω n = ratio formulation is
ωd 1− ζ2 applicable to any 2nd
order system of this
1  x1  2πζ form
∴ ln  =
n −1  x n  1− ζ2
x1
For damping < 10% ln ≅ 2πζ
x2

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 24 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Estimate of Response Time
The response of a mechanical system due to an
initial displacement is given as:
X0
x(t) = e −ζω t cos(ωd t − φ)
n

1− ζ2
The exponential response envelope is
X0
e −ζω t
n

1− ζ2
whose time constant T of the exponential is
1 1
=
ζωn σ

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 25 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Estimate of Response Time
The response of the second-order system in terms
of the settling time is
4 4
t s = 4T = =
ζω n σ
which will cause 2%
of the initial value

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 26 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
State Space Representation
The ‘state’ of the system can be described in
terms of the displacement and velocity as
 x1   x   x1   x (displ) 
 =  X= = 
 x 2   x&   x 2   x ( velocity) 
&
u = f (force) and y = x (measured by sensor)

k c 1
Then &x& = − x − x& + f ( t )
m m m
OR
k c 1
x& 2 = − x1 − x 2 + u
m m m

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 27 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
State Space Representation
So that the state space representation is

State  x& 1   0 1   x1   0 
Equation  = k c    +  1 u
 x& 2  − m − m  x 2   
m

Output  x1 
y = [1 0]  + 0 ⋅ u
Equation
x2 

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 28 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Lagrange’s Equations
d  ∂T  ∂T ∂V
  − + = Q nci
dt  ∂q i  ∂q i ∂q i
T – Kinetic energy
V – Potential energy
Qnci – non-conservative generalized forces
qi – independent generalized coordinates
n – total # independent generalized coordinates

Kinetic Energy is a function of T ( qi , t ) dq / dt


Potential energy is the sum of elastic potential Ve
and gravitational potential Vg
Potential Energy is a function of V ( qi , t )

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 29 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Lagrange’s Equations
One standard form of Lagrange’s Equation
d  ∂L  ∂L
  − = Qnci where L = T-V
dt  ∂q&i  ∂qi

We can then write


d  ∂ (T − V )  ∂ (T − V )
  − = Qnci
dt  ∂q&i  ∂qi

(Note V is not a function of q&i )

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 30 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Lagrange’s Equations
Kinetic energy for a particle
1
1D ⇒ T = mv 2 If the mass is not located at a
2 point (such as a particle), then
a more complicated form of
1 2 1
2D ⇒ T = mv + I c ω2 these equations is necessary
2 2
Potential Energy of an 1 2
elastic element is Ve = kδ
2
Potential Energy of
a mass is Vg = mgh

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 31 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Lagrange’s Equations
Non-conservative Forces are those that cannot be
derived from a potential function (i.e., external forces,
frictional forces)
Generalized Forces are given by Virtual Work.

δW = ∑ Qi δq i = Q1δq1 + Q 2δq 2 + L
To determine Qj, obtain δW, then let all δq i = 0 except δq j
Thus

δW δq j = 0
Qj =
δq j j≠i

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 32 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Lagrange’s Equations
Non-conservative Forces are then:
δWnc = ∑ Q nci δq i = Q nc1δq1 + Q nc 2δq 2 + L

Then
δWnc δq i = 0
Q nci =
δq i j≠i

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 33 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example using Lagrange Equation
Use Lagrange EQ to obtain k
differential equation for m f(t)
SDOF system
c
x
Only one independent generalized coordinate exists: q=x
1 2 1
Kinetic Energy T = mvc = mx& 2
2 2

Potential Energy V = Ve =
1 2
2
kx Vg = 0 ( )
Non-conservative f ( t ) − applied
Forces
cx& − dissipative

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 34 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example using Lagrange Equation
Non-Conservative Forces
δWnc = [f ( t ) − cx& ]δx
δWnc = Q nc δx
δWnc
Q nc = = f ( t ) − cx&
δx
Lagrange Equation
d  ∂T  ∂T ∂V
 − + = Q nc
dt  ∂x&  ∂x ∂x

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 35 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example using Lagrange Equation

Lagrange Equation d  ∂T  ∂T ∂V
 − + = Q nc
dt  ∂x&  ∂x ∂x
Where 1
∂ ( mx& 2 ) Then substituting
∂T
= 2 = mx&
∂x& ∂x&
m&x& + kx = f ( t ) − cx&
∂T
d( )
∂x& = m&x& OR
dt
1
m&x& + cx& + kx = f ( t )
∂ ( mx& 2 )
∂T
= 2 =0
∂x ∂x
1 2
∂ ( kx )
∂V
= 2 = kx
∂x ∂x
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 36 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example using Lagrange Equation
Now let’s repeat this with the Lagrange function

1 2 1
L = T − V = mx − kx 2
&
2 2
∂L
∂( )
∂x& − ∂L = Q
nc
∂t ∂x
1
∂ ( mx& 2 − kx 2 )
∂L
= 2 = mx&
∂x& ∂x&
∂L
( ) = mx&
∂x&
∂L
∂( )
∂x& = m&x& ∴ m&x& + cx& + kx = f ( t )
∂t
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 37 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Translational Mechanical System

g
k
Undeformed position
xst
m Static equilibrium
x Dynamic position
y
Solution

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 38 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Translational Mechanical System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 39 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Translational Mechanical System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 40 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Translational Mechanical System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 41 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Two DOF Systems

Consider f1(t) f2(t)


k
m1 m2
c
x1 x2
STATE
FBD (assume x1 > x2) ASSUMPTIONS!!!
← k ( x1 − x 2 ) →
f1→ m1 m2 → f2
← c( x& 1 − x& 2 ) →
∑ F = ma (1) f1 ( t ) − c( x& 1 − x& 2 ) − k ( x1 − x 2 ) = m1&x&1
∑ F = ma (2) f 2 ( t ) + c( x& 1 − x& 2 ) + k ( x1 − x 2 ) = m 2 &x& 2

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 42 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Two DOF Systems

Rearranging Terms
m1&x&1 + cx& 1 − cx& 2 + kx1 − kx 2 = f1 ( t )
m 2 &x& 2 − cx& 1 + cx& 2 − kx1 + kx 2 = f 2 ( t )

m1 0   &x&1   c − c  x& 1   k − k   x1   f1 


 0 m  &x&  + − c c  x&  + − k k  x  = f 
 2  2    2    2   2 

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 43 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Two DOF Systems

Consider f1(t) f2(t)


k2
m1 m2
k1 c
x1 x2

FBD (assume x2 > x1)


∑ F = ma (1) f1 ( t ) − k1x1 + c( x& 2 − x& 1 ) + k 2 ( x 2 − x1 ) = m1&x&1
∑ F = ma (2) f 2 ( t ) − c( x& 2 − x& 1 ) − k 2 ( x 2 − x1 ) = m 2 &x& 2

f1 ( t ) → → c( x& 2 − x& 1 ) ←
m1 m2 → f 2 ( t )
k1 x 1 ← → k 2 ( x 2 − x1 ) ←

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 44 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Two DOF Systems

Rearranging terms

m1&x&1 + cx& 1 − cx& 2 + (k1 + k 2 ) x1 − k 2 x 2 = f1 ( t )


m 2 &x& 2 − cx& 1 + cx& 2 − k 2 x1 + k 2 x 2 = f 2 ( t )

m1 0   &x&1   c − c  x& 1  (k1 + k 2 ) − k 2   x1   f1 


 0 m  &x&  + − c c  x&  +  − k   = 
k 2  x 2  f 2 
 2  2    2   2

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 45 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Rotational Systems

A rotational system follows the same equations


developed for translation
Newton’s Second Law
∑ M 0 = I0α M 0 − moments applied
I 0 − mass moment of int
α−w & angular accel.

Mass moment of inertia of rigid body about axis

J or I 0 = ∫ r 2dm

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 46 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Rotational Systems

Torsion spring stiffness similar to translation


Tk = K T (θ 2 − θ1 )
Tk = K T (θ REL ) FT − LB / RAD

Dashpot similar to translation


TD = C D (θ& 2 − θ& 1 ) C D or B often used

TD = C D (θ REL )

Right hand rule convention determines +/-

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 47 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Rotational Systems

θIN θOUT
J

FBD

TS J TD

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 48 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Rotational Systems - Equations

d 2 θ0
∑ M = Jα ⇒ TS + TD = J 2
= Iα
dt
TS = K T (θ IN − θOUT )

TD = −Bθ& OUT

K T (θ IN − θOUT ) − Bθ& OUT = J&θ&OUT

J&θ&OUT + Bθ& OUT + K T θOUT = K T θ IN

Most systems we will treat will be 2D or planar


systems. Modeling of general 3D bodies is more
complex and beyond the scope of this course.

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 49 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - SDOF Torsional System

T( t ) J B J
T( t )
Bθ&
K Kθ

θ θ
(a ) ( b)

A torsional system: (a) physical system, (b) FBD

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 50 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - SDOF Torsional System
Consider a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) torsional
system. The system consists of a shaft of torsional
stiffness K, a disk of mass-moment of inertia J, and a
torsional damper B. Derive the differential equation.

Solution. Applying the moment equation about the mass center


along the longitudinal axis.
+ → ∑ M c = Icα → +
This sign convention is simpler and useful for the given angle θ.
Thus,
T ( t ) − Kθ − Bθ& = J&θ&
The differential equation in the input-output form is
J&θ& + Bθ& + Kθ = T( t )

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 51 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Two DOF Torsional System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 52 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Two DOF Torsional System

Source: Dynamic Systems – Vu & Esfandiari

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 53 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example - Rigid Body in Planar Motion

Point mass on string – Moment method


0
∑ M 0 = I 0α
L − L sin θ mg = (0 + ml2 )&θ&
θ
mL2θ&& + mgL sin θ = 0

mg
L sin θ g
As before θ&& + sin θ = 0
L

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 54 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Pendulum Problem

Thin uniform rod of mass m and length l is a pendulum


0
FBD
g
L θ θ

mg
∑ M 0 = I 0α

L
− sin θ mg = I 0θ&&
2
l
Then I 0&θ& + mg sin θ = 0
2

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 55 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Pendulum Problem

Linearization: For small θ → sin θ ⇒ θ

&& mgL
I 0θ + θ =0
2
mgL
or θ +&& θ =0
2I 0

1
where I 0 = I c + md 2 Ic = mL2
12
L 2
= I c + m( )
1 2
2
I 0 = mL
3

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 56 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Mixed Translation and Rotation
θ
r Pulley system
Ic
Ic of pulley, mass m of radius r,
k Tension in string
m x

Newton’s second law for mass m m&x& = −T


(everything measured from equilibrium so no mg term)
Rotation of pulley J&θ& = Tr − kxr
For small angle x = rθ then J&θ& = −m&x&r − kxr
and (J + mr 2 )&θ& + kr 2θ = 0
2
&θ& + kr
or 2
θ=0
J + mr
kr 2
The natural frequency is ωn =
J + mr 2
22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 57 Dr. Peter Avitabile
Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem
Consider the pendulum system
k M shown attached to a horizontal
cart
L Cart moves horizontally on
c
θ m frictionless surface. Mass on
inextensible string

This is a mixed problem. First solve the pendulum and


then the cart translation.
The general moment about point P (where the string is
attached to the cart mass) is needed to sum the forces
for Newton’s Second Law.

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 58 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem

∑ Mp = Ipα + mrc / p x a p

Py

P Px a p = &x&
φ
L θ
rc / p = L
θ 1

L sinθ C1
mg

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 59 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem
The cross product term is
rc/p × ap = rc/p ap sinφ
= L&x& sin(90 − θ) = L&x& cosθ
Using the parallel axis theorem, the mass of the
pendulum at a distance L gives
Ip = mL2 ⇒ Ipα = mL2&θ&
The moment about P due to the mass on the pendulum is
M = −mgL sinθ
The general moment equation becomes
− mgL sinθ = m L2&θ& + m L&x& cosθ

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 60 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem
Now the translational equation is evaluated. Only horizontal
is considered.

kx
cx& M f (t ) a px = &x&

L tangential
θ centripetal Lθ& 2 L&θ&

m Lθ& 2 sinθ L&θcos


& θ
L sinθ

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 61 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem
For the cart, Newton’s Second Law
The acceleration of the pendulum mass
&x& + L&θ&cosθ − Lθ& 2sinθ
(cart) (tangential) (centripetal)

∑ F = ma ⇒ f (t) − kx − cx&

= m(&x& + L&θ& cosθ − Lθ& 2 sin θ) + M&x&

θ → mL2&θ& + mL&x& cosθ + mgLsin θ = 0

( )
x → (M + m)&x& + m L&θ& cosθ − Lθ& 2 sinθ + cx& + kx = f (t)

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 62 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Example – Cart-Pendulum Problem
For small motion, the
equations can be linearized (cosθ ≈1; sinθ ≈ θ; θ& ≈ 0) 2

mL2&θ& + mL&x& + mgLθ = 0


(M + m)&x& + mL&θ& + cx& + kx = f (t)
or in matrix forms as

mL2 mL &θ& 0 0θ&  mgL 0θ  0 


   +    +    = 
 mL (M + m)&x& 0 cx&   0 kx f (t)

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 63 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory
Chapter 4 - Review Slide

x1 x2 xn x1
t1 t2 tn
ln ≅ 2πζ
x2
T
f
f x1
k1
x
x2
k1 k2 k2

k1k 2
k eq = k1 + k 2 k eq =
k1 + k 2

22.451 Dynamic Systems – Chapter 4 64 Dr. Peter Avitabile


Modal Analysis & Controls Laboratory

Вам также может понравиться