Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Water Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/watres
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 11 July 2015
Received in revised form
26 October 2015
Accepted 5 November 2015
Available online 12 November 2015
Desalination technologies have evolved and advanced rapidly along with increasing water demands
around the world since 1950s. Many reviews have focused on the techno-economic and environmental
and ecological issues of the desalination technologies and emphasized the feasibility of desalination
industry as an alternative to meet the water demands in many water scarce regions. Despite these efforts,
many perceptions about desalination processes hinder their applications for potential water supplies.
This article has two specic aims: 1) provide an overview of the desalination trends around the world
and discuss the sustainability components of desalination processes in comparison with other water
supply alternatives; and 2) discuss case studies for desalination, and drivers and factors that inuence
sustainable desalination and other alternative water sources for desalination to increase our current
understanding on the sensitive and futuristic issues of water supply and resource management options
for drought facing regions. Although some of the facts and recent developments discussed here show
that desalination can be affordable and potentially sustainable, contributions that meaningfully address
socio-economic and ecological and environmental issues of desalination processes are urgently required
in this critical era of severe water stress for the present context and the future development of desalination technologies.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Desalination
Sustainability
Environmental impacts
Socioeconomics
Water transport
Social acceptance
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
88
5.
6.
7.
8.
4.5.
Desalination in Saudi Arabia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
4.6.
Desalination market around the world . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Affordable desalination e a worldwide scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
What drives desalination? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Other alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
89
90
Fig. 2. Desalination industry by technology, users, and cost components (Costs assume a $0.05/kWh electricity cost and an oil price of $60/bbl).
91
92
Table 1
Comparison of water costs for conventional and desalination water supply options (Voutchkov, 2011, 2014; Plappally, 2012).
Range
Low
Medium
Higha
a
0.1e0.5
1.0e2.5
2.5e4.5
2.5e2.8
3.0e3.5
4.0e4.5
0.25e0.75
0.75e2.50
2.50e5.00
0.50e0.80
1.00e1.50
2.00e4.00
Conveyance and distribution costs included, even higher water costs are applied in some countries.
Fig. 3. Comparison of water costs for conventional and transported desalination water supply options.
93
94
Table 2
pner, 2008; Dawoud and Al Mulla, 2012).
Potential ecological/environmental impacts of the RO and MSF desalination process concentrates (Lattemann and Ho
Physical properties
Salinity and temperature
Plume density
RO plants
MSF plants
Environmental/ecological impacts
Negatively buoyant
Heavy metals
Cleaning chemicals
Cleaning chemicals
95
96
Fig. 4. Existing and proposed desalination plants in California, surface water and brackish desalination plants in Florida and Texas.
Fig. 5. California's continuous drought since 2011 and water supply options and relative energy consumption (kWh/m3) for southern California to battle the continuous drought and
simultaneous increase in water demands (water transport from the northern Californian dams and reservoirs, water transport from Colorado River, water reclamation for indirect
water reuse, and desalination of inland brackish water or seawater from pacic ocean and gulf of Mexico (Cooley, 2014).
98
99
the most populated city was enhanced albeit at high capital costs
which could have been reduced signicantly if the decisionconstruction process was delayed for over a year (Traves and
Davies, 2008; Water Services Association of Australia, 2008;
Water Services Association of Australia Ltd, 2013). Renewable energy sources such as wind farms have been utilized at many of
these plants (WSAA, 2011). The Australia's annual investment in
water supply and sources is about $2 billion per year equivalent to
$81 per capita per year (Australian dollars). The average residential
water use has decreased from 243 L per capita per day in 2003 to
191 L per capita per day in 2007 (WSAA, 2012). The country has
invested signicantly in water conservation, water reuse, recycling,
and reclamation, and rainwater harvesting as a strategic plan for
mitigating the impacts of droughts as well as allocating large reservoirs as water storage vessels. Although the recent drought
conditions disappeared, these will return in time and Australia is
prepared with its sophisticated infrastructure and management
policies to provide sustainable water supplies with condence
(WSAA, 2013; Radcliffe, 2015).
Desalination is not the ultimate solution for many communities
in Australia where it can have detrimental environmental impacts
on the concentrate receiving environment. Water recycling through
indirect potable reuse is a potential option to reduce the need for
high desalination capacities. However, there could be a high opposition from the local communities. As a part of the efforts to
convince the public and encourage high social acceptance for water
recycling alternatives (indirect potable reuse) over desalination
(because treatment costs and energy requirements for wastewater
recycling are lower) for water source supplies, several campaigns
were implemented. A comparison between the two options was
prepared as shown in Table 3 (National Water Commission, 2008).
Despite several successful attempts on the public educational
campaigns, indirect potable reuse was an unacceptable option for
public leaving desalination as the primary technology for water
supply.
high end use. The country has set a target of becoming water selfsufcient by the year 2061. To achieve this, a sustainable strategy
with four major elements has been adopted (Fig. 7). These are
water catchment (i), reclaimed water (ii) desalination (iii) and
imported water (iv) (Xie, 2006; Khoo, 2009; Luan, 2010). The local
water catchment area includes a comprehensive network of drains,
rivers and canals and 17 reservoirs which occupy about 65% of the
land area. This is planned to be enlarged to 90% of the land area by
2061 to increase the local water catchment for benecial uses
making this project the largest in the world for an urban setting
(Wong, 2011). Reclaimed water also known as NEWater is a
recycled water program that collects wastewater efuents and
processes it through advanced treatment schemes such as membrane ltration (ultraltration followed by reverse osmosis) and UV
disinfection for reuse purposes. This treatment scheme provides
water quality which exceeds the WHO (world health organization)
guidelines for drinking water quality. This NEWater system
network consists of four major used water treatment plants (Bedok
e 86,000 m3/d; Kranji 55,000 m3/d; Ulu Pandan e 150,000 m3/
d and Changi e 230,000 m3/d) which meets up to 30% of the current nation's water demand. The third element is the desalination
processes installed to treat seawater to produce freshwater at two
major desalination plants with a total capacity of 460,000 m3/d but
only operating at 230,000 m3/d which is 10% of the current water
needs. The fourth and the most signicant water supply option for
Singapore is imported water. Nearly 1.1 million m3/d of water is
transported from Malaysia through causeway system. The 2061
water self-sufciency strategic plan for the country is to provide for
100% water needs independently by the rst three strategic elements -by increasing the NEWater supplies to 50% and desalination
capacity to 30% and local water catchment to 20%. Singapore also
invested signicantly into programs to enhance the efforts of public
education and water conservation (Tortajada and Joshi, 2013).
Table 3
Comparison of desalination and water recycling schemes in Australia (National Water Commission, 2008).
Item
Desalination
Water recycling
Example
Plant location
Intake structure
Intake structure capacity
Feed water
Total dissolved solids,
in feedwater (TDS)
Treatment process
Product distribution
100
Fig. 7. Sustainable water supply strategic plan for Singapore: (i) local catchment areas; (ii) wastewater reclamation and reuse; (iii) desalination; and (iv) water transport (map of
catchment areas in the inset).
revenues increased steadily over the recent years (Fig. 8D) despite
the energy requirements and associated environmental emissions
(Peng, 2015).
4.5. Desalination in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia withdraws about 20,000 106 m3 annually despite
its annual renewable water capacity of only 2400 106 m3
(Kajenthira et al., 2012). It is the largest country in the world
without rivers and lakes (Llamas and Custudio, 2003) and has a
population of 25.7 million. About 80% of the water supplies are met
with the non-renewable groundwater sources which require
desalination due to high salinity. Saudi Arabia has the largest share
(17%) of the worldwide desalination capacity. The country needs to
increase the daily desalination capacity by 6 106 m3 which may
cost up to 200 billion dollars (Mezher et al., 2011). Between 2012
and 2015, the desalination capacity was expected to grow by 9.5
percent annually. The Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC)
plans to invest $11.7 billion in capital expenditures and $4.5 billion
in operations expenditures through 2020, highlighting the vast
opportunities for desalination technology development and engineering, procurement, and construction rms (KSA, 2013).
Saline Water Conversion Corporation in Saudi Arabia constructed the world's largest desalination in Ras Al-Khair, an industrial city with a capacity of 0.728 106 m3 per day in 2014
(Water technology 2015a). The hybrid desalination plant consists of
8-MSF units and 17-RO units. The MSF units have a capacity of
0.606 106 m3 per day while the RO units hold a capacity of
0.257 106 m3 per day. This project also houses 2650 MW combined cycle power plant. The project construction cost was SAR
27bn which is approximately $7.2bn (Water technology 2015b).
There are six major projects expected to tender during the
2015e2016 timeframe. The largest is the Jubail thermal and reverse
osmosis (hybrid) project estimated to be worth US$ 3 billion (GWI,
2015). The remaining ve projects are all saline water conversion
plants utilizing reverse osmosis; they include Rabigh Phase 4, US$
1.2 billion; Umluj SWRO, US$ 30 million; Aqeer SWRO, US$ 20
million; and, South Dhahran SWRO, US$ 200 million. For this to
happen, developments in engineering services, membrane and
thermal desalination technologies and efcient utilization of solar
energy should be pursued. Wastewater treatment also needs
101
Fig. 8. Water transfer project in China. (A) Red lines show the southenorth water transportation project for transferring water from Yangtze River to Beijing and Tianjin major cities;
(B) energy requirements for various water supply options; (C) trends in desalination costs between years 1995 and 2015; and (D) desalination market value over the recent years.
(For interpretation of the references to colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
102
Fig. 9. Water desalination affordability around the world (These water tariffs include water and wastewater xed costs, water variable costs, wastewater variable costs and total
sales tax (GWI)).
103
104
8. Conclusions
Once considered as energy- and cost-intensive technology for
freshwater production, desalination has now become a promising
alternative for providing freshwater needs around the world. The
desalination industry is projected to experience unprecedented
growth concurrently with population growth and rapid industrialization all over the world. The following areas need to be given
proper consideration while planning for new desalination plants:
Desalination costs have declined signicantly for both thermal
and membrane technologies over the past decades. Signicant
cost reductions have been achieved, especially for RO technology, favored by growth rate, plant capacity, higher permeation
rates and improvements in membrane materials. However,
further reduction in desalinated water costs in the future is quite
a challenging task despite the continuous improvements in
membrane and energy recovery technologies since the equipment, raw materials, and energy costs are rapidly rising. Hence,
greater understanding of water scarcity scenarios and discoveries targeting local supply issues will benet from strategic
planning and management. Further, technological advances in
novel membrane development, process congurations such as
closed circuit RO and process hybridization of membrane and
thermal processes are crucial for developments in the near
future.
More research efforts should be dedicated to development of
desalination technologies such as membrane distillation and
adsorption desalination that can efciently harvest solar energy
and waste process heat for water production. Process management schemes should not only focus on minimizing specic
energy consumption but also on enhancing water recovery
through various options.
Environmental regulations for desalination plants are being
implemented more strictly in countries like the United States,
the European Union and Australia which might add to the
desalination costs, particularly due to high project permitting
requirements and fee. However, if the environmental pollution
Acknowledgments
This research was supported the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), the Bagley College of Engineering
(BCoE), and The Ofce of Research and Economic Development
(ORED) at Mississippi State University. The author acknowledges
the funding support from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) through P3 (People, Planet, and Prosperity)
Phase I Awards SU835721 and SU835722.
References
Agus, E., Voutchkov, N., Sedlak, D.L., 2009. Disinfection by-products and their potential impact on the quality of water produced by desalination systems: a
literature review. Desalination 237, 214e237.
Agus, E., Sedlak, D.L., 2010. Formation and fate of chlorination by-products in
reverse osmosis desalination systems. Water Res 44 (5), 1616e1626.
Al-Musallam, L., 2006. Water and wastewater privatization in Saudi Arabia. In:
SAWEA 2006 Workshop: Privatization and Outsourcing of Water and
Wastewater.
Australian Government National Water Commission, 2005. http://www.water.gov.
au/publications/AWR2005_Level_2_Report_May07.pdf
Bednorz, E., 2014. Global Water Prices Outstrip Ination as Scarcity, Neglect and
Public Finances Catch up with Customers. http://www.prweb.com/releases/
2014/10/prweb12216091.htm. Retrieved on June 21, 2015.
Bennett, A., 2011a. Cost effective desalination: innovation continues to lower
desalination costs. Filtr. Sep. 48 (4), 24e27.
Bennett, A., 2011b. Sustainable desalination: renewable energy in desalination
systems. Filtr. Sep. 48 (5), 24e27.
Bennett, A., 2013. 50th anniversary: desalination: 50 years of progress. Filtr. Sep. 50
(3), 32e39.
Bond, R., Batchelor, B., Davis, T., Klayman, B., 2011. Zero liquid discharge desalination
of brackish water with an innovative form of electrodialysis: electrodialysis
metathesis. Fla. Water Resour. J. 63 (7), 36e44.
105
106
Oren, Y., Korngold, E., Daltrophe, N., Messalem, R., Volkman, Y., Aronov, L., Gilron, J.,
2010. Pilot studies on high recovery BWRO-EDR for near zero liquid discharge
approach. Desalination 261 (3), 321e330.
Penata, B., Garcia-Rodriguez, L., 2012. Current trends and future prospects in the
design of seawater reverse osmosis desalination technology. Desalination 284,
1e8.
Peng, J. Market Report: Developing Desalination in China. Retrieved on June 21,
2015
http://www.waterworld.com/articles/wwi/print/volume-25/issue-6/
regional-spotlight-asia-pacic/market-report-developing-desalination.html.
Plappally, A.K., 2012. Energy requirements for water production, treatment, end
use, reclamation, and disposal. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (7), 4818e4848.
Qdais, H.A., 2008. Environmental impacts of the mega desalination project: the
RedeDead Sea conveyor. Desalination 220 (1), 16e23.
Radcliffe, J.C., 2015. Water recycling in Australiaeduring and after the drought.
Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 1, 554e562.
Rijsberman, F.R., 2006. Water scarcity: fact or ction? Agric. Water Manag. 80 (1),
5e22.
Roberts, D.A., Johnston, E.L., Knott, N.A., 2010. Impacts of desalination plant discharges on the marine environment: a critical review of published studies.
Water Res. 44 (18), 5117e5128.
Rogers, P., Bhatia, R., Huber, A., 1998. Water as a social and economic good: how to
put the principle into practice. Sweden: Global Water Partnership/Swedish
International Development Cooperation Agency, Stockholm.
Rogers, P.P., Llamas, M.R., Cortina, L.M. (Eds.), 2005. Water Crisis: Myth or Reality?.
CRC Press.
SAMC, July 2010. Forty Sixth Annual Report: The Latest Economic Developments
1431H (2010),. Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency: Research and Statistics
Department, Riyadh.
Sachs, Goldman, 2013. Sustainable Growth: Taking a Deep Dive into Water.
Savenije, H.H., 2002. Why water is not an ordinary economic good, or why the girl is
special. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 27 (11), 741e744.
Semiat, Raphael, 2000. Present and Future. Water International 25.1, pp. 54e65.
Semiat, R., 2008. Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42
(22), 8193e8201.
Shrestha, E., Ahmad, S., Johnson, W., Shrestha, P., Batista, J.R., 2011. Carbon footprint
of water conveyance versus desalination as alternatives to expand water supply.
Desalination 280 (1), 33e43.
Southern Seawater Desalination Project e Social Impact Management Plan, 2009.
Watercorporation.com.au. Retrieved on June 21, 2015.
Stewart, M.E., Blogoslawski, W.J., Hsu, R.Y., Helz, G.R., 1979. Byproducts of oxidative
biocides - toxicity to oyster larvae. Mar. Pollut. Bull 10, 166e169.
Stokes, J.R., Horvath, A., 2009. Energy and air emission effects of water supply.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (8), 2680e2687.
Stover, R., August 28e29, 2015. High Efciency Water Treatment. DesalTech 2015,
San Diego, California.
Subbaraman, R., Shitole, S., Shitole, T., Sawant, K., O'Brien, J., Bloom, D.E., PatilDeshmukh, A., 2013. The social ecology of water in a Mumbai slum: failures in
water quality, quantity, and reliability. BMC Public Health 13 (1), 173.
Subramani, A., Jacangelo, J.G., 2015. Emerging desalination technologies for water
treatment: a critical review. Water Res. 75, 164e187.
Swaminathan, J., August 28-29, 2015. MVC-MD Hybrids for Lower Specic Energy
Consumption. DesalTech 2015, San Diego, California.
Tan, Y.S., Lee, T.J., Tan, K., 2009. Clean, Green and Blue: Singapore's Journey towards
Environmental and Water Sustainability. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Timofti, D., Doltu, C., Tron, M., 2011. Eutrophication phenomena in reservoirs.
Aerul Apa. Compon. Mediu. 473.
Tortajada, C., Joshi, Y.K., 2013. Water demand management in Singapore: involving