Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Objectives of Tests
Conclusions
Material Used
-1-6 mm iron ore fines
- Blend of
-Hard Laminated Ore
- Lateritic Ore
- Soft Laminated Ore
- Friable Ore
-Challenging because of
- fines (1-6 mm)
- presence of LO, flat and
porous particles, NGM
5 Sec
10 Sec
15 Sec
30 Sec
Layer densities
Where
Yield %
80
60
10 Sec
40
15 Sec
30 Sec
20
45 Sec
0
60
61
62 63 64
Fe % Grade
65
100
100
80
80
60
10 Sec
40
15 Sec
Yield %
Yield %
59
66
67
60
10 Sec
40
15 Sec
30 Sec
20
45 Sec
30 Sec
20
45 Sec
0
1
3
Silica % Grade
1.5
2
2.5
Alumina % Grade
80
60
30 Sec (~59.54 Fe%)
40
20
0
Yield %
Fe Recovery %
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
55565758596061626364656667
Fe % Grade
Fe % Grade
63
100
62
90
61 65
80
90
60
59 63
50
58
40
57
100
70
60 64
62
61
56
60
55
59
0
20
40
60
80
80
Grade
30
Recovery60
20
50
10
40
30
100
20
Yield, %
58
70
10
57
0
0
20
40
60
Yield, %
80
100
Series1
Series2
Conclusions
The current ore shows a tougher segregation pattern to improve grade-recovery curve
Improved head grade (above 61.5% Fe) improves the grade-recovery curve and hence
the yield of the final concentrate @ 63.5 - 64%Fe.
Jigs
Linear Screens
Agitators
Animation
18
Sustainability
Mine Life Sustenance
A
B
Blend Ore
Concentrate
C
D
LOI
NML
NMDC
Mintek
50
55
60
65
Head Grade, Fe%
70