Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
4.3.
Overseeing
to
ascertain
that
laws
and
regulations
are
complied
with;
4.4.
Regular
investigation
which
shall
not
be
oftener
than
once
a
year
from
the
last
date
of
examination
to
determine
whether
an
institution
is
conducting
its
business
on
a
safe
or
sound
basis:
Provided,
That
the
deficiencies/irregularities
found
by
or
discovered
by
an
audit
shall
be
immediately
addressed;
4.5.
Inquiring
into
the
solvency
and
liquidity
of
the
institution
(2-D);
or
4.6.
Enforcing
prompt
corrective
action.
(n)
The
Bangko
Sentral
shall
also
have
supervision
over
the
operations
of
and
exercise
regulatory
powers
over
quasi-banks,
trust
entities
and
other
financial
institutions
which
under
special
laws
are
subject
to
Bangko
Sentral
supervision.
(2-Ca)
For
the
purposes
of
this
Act,
"quasi-banks"
shall
refer
to
entities
engaged
in
the
borrowing
of
funds
through
the
issuance,
endorsement
or
assignment
with
recourse
or
acceptance
of
deposit
substitutes
as
defined
in
Section
95
of
Republic
Act
No.
7653
(hereafter
the
"New
Central
Bank
Act")
for
purposes
of
relending
or
purchasing
of
receivables
and
other
obligations.
Q:
What
is
the
Function
of
the
Monetary
Board
A:
The
Bangko
Sentral
shall
provide
policy
direction
in
the
areas
of
money,
banking
and
credit.
(n)
For
this
purpose,
the
Monetary
Board
may
prescribe
ratios,
ceilings,
limitations,
or
other
forms
of
regulation
on
the
different
types
of
accounts
and
practices
of
banks
and
quasi-banks
which
shall,
to
the
extent
feasible,
conform
to
internationally
accepted
standards,
including
those
of
the
Bank
for
International
Settlements
(BIS).
The
Monetary
Board
may
exempt
particular
categories
of
transactions
from
such
ratios,
ceilings
and
limitations,
but
not
limited
to
exceptional
cases
or
to
enable
a
bank
or
quasi-bank
under
rehabilitation
or
during
a
merger
or
consolidation
to
continue
in
business
with
safety
to
its
creditors,
depositors
and
the
general
public.
Q:
What
is
the
job/role
of
the
BSP
as
vanguard
of
depositor:
A:
SECTION
7.
Examination
by
the
Bangko
Sentral.
The
Bangko
Sentral
shall,
when
examining
a
bank,
have
the
authority
to
examine
an
enterprise
which
is
wholly
or
majority-owned
or
controlled
by
the
bank.
Q:
What
is
the
fit
and
proper
rule?
A:
SECTION
16.
Fit
and
Proper
Rule.
To
maintain
the
quality
of
bank
management
and
afford
better
protection
to
depositors
and
the
public
in
general,
the
Monetary
Board
shall
prescribe,
pass
upon
and
review
the
qualifications
and
disqualifications
of
individuals
elected
or
appointed
bank
directors
or
officers
and
disqualify
those
found
unfit.
After
due
notice
to
the
board
of
directors
of
the
bank,
the
Monetary
Board
may
disqualify,
suspend
or
remove
any
bank
director
or
officer
who
commits
or
omits
an
act
which
render
him
unfit
for
the
position.
In
determining
whether
an
individual
is
fit
and
proper
to
hold
the
position
of
a
director
or
officer
of
a
bank,
regard
shall
be
given
to
his
integrity,
experience,
education,
training,
and
competence
Q:
What
is
the
Bank
of
International
Settlement?
A:
Established
on
17
May
1930,
the
Bank
for
International
Settlements
(BIS)
is
the
world's
oldest
international
financial
organisation.
The
BIS
has
60
member
central
banks,
representing
countries
from
around
the
world
that
together
make
up
about
95%
of
world
GDP.
The
head
office
is
in
Basel,
Switzerland
and
there
are
two
representative
offices:
in
the
Hong
Kong
Special
Administrative
Region
of
the
People's
Republic
of
China
and
in
Mexico
City.
The
mission
of
the
BIS
is
to
serve
central
banks
in
their
pursuit
of
monetary
and
financial
stability,
to
foster
international
cooperation
in
those
areas
and
to
act
as
a
bank
for
central
banks.
Q:
What
are
the
conditions
for
Organization
of
a
bank:
A:
SECTION
8.
Organization.
The
Monetary
Board
may
authorize
the
organization
of
a
bank
or
quasi-bank
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
8.1.
That
the
entity
is
a
stock
corporation
(7);
8.2.
That
its
funds
are
obtained
from
the
public,
which
shall
mean
twenty
(20)
or
more
persons
(2-Da);
and
8.3.
That
the
minimum
capital
requirements
prescribed
by
the
Monetary
Board
for
each
category
of
banks
are
satisfied.
(n)
No
new
commercial
bank
shall
be
established
within
three
(3)
years
from
the
effectivity
of
this
Act.
In
the
exercise
of
the
authority
granted
herein,
the
Monetary
Board
shall
take
into
consideration
their
capability
in
terms
of
their
financial
resources
and
technical
expertise
and
integrity.
The
bank
licensing
process
shall
incorporate
an
assessment
of
the
bank's
ownership
structure,
directors
and
senior
management,
its
operating
plan
and
internal
controls
as
well
as
its
projected
financial
condition
and
capital
base.
Q:
Can
the
Bank
acquire
its
own
shares?
How?
A:
SECTION
10.
Treasury
Stocks.
No
bank
shall
purchase
or
acquire
shares
of
its
own
capital
stock
or
accept
its
own
shares
as
a
security
for
a
loan,
except
when
authorized
by
the
Monetary
Board:
Provided,
That
in
every
case
the
stock
so
purchased
or
acquired
shall,
within
six
(6)
months
from
the
time
of
its
purchase
or
acquisition,
be
sold
or
disposed
of
at
a
public
or
private
sale.
A:
SECTION
15.
Board
of
Directors.
The
provisions
of
the
Corporation
Code
to
the
contrary
notwithstanding,
there
shall
be
at
least
five
(5),
and
a
maximum
of
fifteen
(15)
members
of
the
board
of
directors
of
bank,
two
(2)
of
whom
shall
be
independent
directors.
An
"independent
director"
shall
mean
a
person
other
than
an
officer
or
employee
of
the
bank,
its
subsidiaries
or
affiliates
or
related
interests.
(n)
Non-Filipino
citizens
may
become
members
of
the
board
of
directors
of
a
bank
to
the
extent
of
the
foreign
participation
in
the
equity
of
said
bank.
(Sec.
7,
RA
7721)
The
meetings
of
the
board
of
directors
may
be
conducted
through
modern
technologies
such
as,
but
not
limited
to,
teleconferencing
and
video-conferencing
Q:
Discuss
Regulations
of
Banks
owned
by
Family
Groups
and
Related
Interests
A.
SECTION
12.
Stockholdings
of
Family
Groups
or
Related
Interests.
Stockholdings
of
individuals
related
to
each
other
within
the
fourth
degree
of
consanguinity
or
affinity,
legitimate
or
common-law,
shall
be
considered
family
groups
or
related
interests
and
must
be
fully
disclosed
in
all
transactions
by
such
an
individual
with
the
bank.
SECTION
13.
Corporate
Stockholdings.
Two
or
more
corporations
owned
or
controlled
by
the
same
family
group
or
same
group
of
persons
shall
be
considered
related
interests
and
must
be
fully
disclosed
in
all
transactions
by
such
corporations
or
related
groups
of
persons
with
the
bank
Q:
May
an
elective
official
be
a
director
of
a
bank?
Are
there
exceptions,
if
any.
A:
SECTION
19.
Prohibition
on
Public
Officials.
Except
as
otherwise
provided
in
the
Rural
Banks
Act,
no
appointive
or
elective
public
official,
whether
full-time
or
part-
time
shall
at
the
same
time
serve
as
officer
of
any
private
bank,
save
in
cases
where
such
service
is
incident
to
financial
assistance
provided
by
the
government
or
a
government-owned
or
controlled
corporation
to
the
bank
or
unless
otherwise
provided
under
existing
laws
EXCEPTION:
RA
7353
Sec.
5.
All
members
of
the
Board
of
Directors
of
the
rural
bank
shall
be
citizens
of
the
Philippines
at
the
time
of
their
assumption
to
office:
Provided,
however,
That
nothing
in
this
Act
shall
be
construed
as
prohibiting
any
appointive
or
elective
public
official
from
serving
as
director,
officer,
consultant
or
in
any
capacity
in
the
bank.
Q:
Distinguish
Universal
Bank
from
Commercial
Bank
A:
SECTION
23.
Powers
of
a
Universal
Bank.
A
universal
bank
shall
have
the
authority
to
exercise,
in
addition
to
the
powers
authorized
for
a
commercial
bank
in
Section
29,
the
powers
of
an
investment
house
as
provided
in
existing
laws
and
the
power
to
invest
in
non-allied
enterprises
as
provided
in
this
Act.
SECTION
29.
Powers
of
a
Commercial
Bank.
A
commercial
bank
shall
have,
in
addition
to
the
general
powers
incident
to
corporations,
all
such
powers
as
may
be
necessary
to
carry
on
the
business
of
commercial
banking,
such
as
accepting
drafts
and
issuing
letters
of
credit;
discounting
and
negotiating
promissory
notes,
drafts,
bills
of
exchange,
and
other
evidences
of
debt;
accepting
or
creating
demand
deposits;
receiving
other
types
of
deposits
and
deposit
substitutes;
buying
and
selling
foreign
exchange
and
gold
or
silver
bullion;
acquiring
marketable
bonds
and
other
debt
securities;
and
extending
credit,
subject
to
such
rules
as
the
Monetary
Board
may
promulgate.
These
rules
may
include
the
determination
of
bonds
and
other
debt
securities
eligible
for
investment,
the
maturities
and
aggregate
amount
of
such
investment.
Q:
Discuss
how
Universal
Banks
can
invest
in
financial
allied
sources
A:
Equity
investments
of
Universal
bank
in
Financial
Allied
enterprise
1. Universal
bank
can
own
100%
of
the
equity
in
a
thrift,
rural
bank
or
financial
allied
enterprise
2. Publicly-listed
universal
or
commercial
bank
may
own
100%
of
voting
stock
of
another
universal
or
commercial
bank
3. If
not
publicly-list
then
only
49%
own
4. Following
are
financial
allied
enterprises:
Leasing
companies
Banks
Investment
houses
Financing
companies
Credit
card
companies
Financial
institutions
Companies
in
stock
brokerage
and
foreign
exchange
dealership
Insurance
companies
Holding
company
provided
that
the
equities
of
the
entity
is
confined
under
universal
bank
BSP
regulation
Q:
Discuss
how
Universal
Banks
can
invest
in
non-financial
allied
sources
A:
Equity
investments
of
universal
bank
in
non-financial
allied
enterprise
Universal
bank
may
own
up
to
100%
of
equity
in
non-financial
allied
Examples
are:
1.
Warehousing
companies
2.
Storage
3.
Safe
deposit
box
officers
under
a
fringe
benefit
plan
approved
by
the
Bangko
Sentral.
The
required
approval
shall
be
entered
upon
the
records
of
the
bank
and
a
copy
of
such
entry
shall
be
transmitted
forthwith
to
the
appropriate
supervising
and
examining
department
of
the
Bangko
Sentral.
Restriction
on
Bank
Exposure
to
Directors,
Officers,
Stockholder
and
related
interests
(DOSRI)
No
DOSRI
can
directly
or
indirectly
borrow
from
such
bank
or
become
a
guarantor,
indorser
or
surety
for
loan
Exception
is
when
there
is
a
written
approval
of
the
majority
of
all
directors
of
the
bank
excluding
the
DOSRI
concerned
Such
approval
is
not
required
if
it
is
under
a
fringe
benefit
plan
approved
by
BSP
Directors
include
those
named
in
incorporations,
elected
or
filled
Officers
shall
include
any
person
who
performs
function
of
management
Stockholder
stockholder
of
record
in
the
books
of
the
bank
st
Related
interest
includes
souse
or
relative
within
1 degree
or
by
legal
adoption.
This
includes
partnership,
co-ownership
of
DOSRIs
Corporations
where
the
above
mentioned
owns
20%
of
subscribed
capital,
then
the
prohibition
shall
apply
Can
also
be
less
than
50%
if
the
DOS
sits
as
representative
of
the
bank
in
the
board
of
such
corporation
Effect
of
violation
:
The
director
or
officer
who
violates
may
be
declared
vacant
and
subject
to
penal
provisions
of
NCBA
Limit
on
loans
:
MB
can
limit
the
valid
loan
given
to
DOSRI
provided
that
it
shall
be
based
on
their
unencumbered
deposits
and
book
value
of
their
paid
in
capital
contribution
Exclusion
to
Limit:
Loans
and
credit
accommodations
considered
as
non-risk
Loans
and
credit
accommodations
to
officers
in
for
of
fringe
benefits
Limit
on
loans
and
credit
accommodations
shall
not
apply
on
those
extended
by
coop
bank
to
its
coop
shareholders
Applicability
of
DOSRI
Rules
and
Regulation
to
Government
Borrowings:
Circular
547
of
2006
provides
that
DOSRI
rules
shall
also
apply
to
loans
and
credit
accommodations
granted
to
RP
,
subdivisions,
instrumentalities
and
GOCCs
Exceptions
would
be:
1. Loans
and
credit
accommodations
that
are
non-risk
and
not
subject
to
ceiling
2. Those
made
by
BSP
Q:
Discuss
the
Confidentiality
Rule
in
All
Bank
Transactions
A:
SECTION
55.
Prohibited
Transactions.
55.4.
Consistent
with
the
provisions
of
Republic
Act
No.
1405,
otherwise
known
as
the
Banks
Secrecy
Law,
no
bank
shall
employ
casual
or
nonregular
personnel
or
too
lengthy
probationary
personnel
in
the
conduct
of
its
business
involving
bank
deposits
REPUBLIC
ACT
NO.1405
-
AN
ACT
PROHIBITING
DISCLOSURE
OF
OR
INQUIRY
INTO,
DEPOSITS
WITH
ANY
BANKING
INSTITUTION
AND
PROVIDING
PENALTY
THEREFOR
SECTION
1.
It
is
hereby
declared
to
be
the
policy
of
the
Government
to
give
encouragement
to
the
people
to
deposit
their
money
in
banking
institutions
and
to
discourage
private
hoarding
so
that
the
same
may
be
properly
utilized
by
banks
in
authorized
loans
to
assist
in
the
economic
development
of
the
country.
SECTION
2.
All
deposits
of
whatever
nature
with
banks
or
banking
institutions
in
the
Philippines
including
investments
in
bonds
issued
by
the
Government
of
the
Philippines,
its
political
subdivisions
and
its
instrumentalities,
are
hereby
considered
as
of
an
absolutely
confidential
nature
and
may
not
be
examined,
inquired
or
looked
into
by
any
person,
government
official,
bureau
or
office,
except
upon
written
permission
of
the
depositor,
or
in
cases
of
impeachment,
or
upon
order
of
a
competent
court
in
cases
of
bribery
or
dereliction
of
duty
of
public
officials,
or
in
cases
where
the
money
deposited
or
invested
is
the
subject
matter
of
the
litigation.
SECTION
3.
It
shall
be
unlawful
for
any
official
or
employee
of
a
banking
institution
to
disclose
to
any
person
other
than
those
mentioned
in
Section
two
hereof
any
information
concerning
said
deposits.
Q:
What
is
the
purpose
of
the
GBL?
A:
The
GBL
of
2000
as
well
as
improving
market
access,
upgraded
the
rules
governing
the
operation
of
the
BSP
to
conform
to
international
banking
standards.
The
aim
was
to
promote
and
maintain
a
stable
and
efficient
banking
and
financial
system
that
is
globally
competitive,
dynamic,
and
responsive
to
the
demands
of
a
developing
economy
ADDITIONAL
QUESTIONS
FOR
MIDTERM
REVIEW
Q:
What
are
the
functions
that
a
bank
can
outsource?
A:
BSP
Circular
765,
pursuant
to
the
Money
Board
Resolution
No.
1179
dated
July
19,
2012,
approved
the
revisions
to
the
outsourcing
framework
of
banks,
amending
the
entirety
of
relevant
sections
and
other
provisions
of
the
Manual
of
Regulations
for
Banks.
An
amended
Section
X162.2
on
the
Prohibition
against
outsourcing
of
inherent
banking
functions.
No
bank
shall
outsource
functions
such
as:
1. Services
normally
associated
with
placement
of
deposits
and
withdrawals
including
the
recognition
based
on
recording
of
movements
in
the
deposit
accounts;
2. Granting
of
loans
and
extension
of
other
credit
exposures
3. Position
taking
and
market
risk
taking
activities
4. Managing
of
risk
exposures;
and
5. Strategic
decision
making
Q:
What
is
the
degree
of
diligence
required
of
Banks
to
be
exercised?
A:
The
time-honored,
and
still
current,
judicial
doctrine
on
the
degree
of
bank
diligence
is
that
every
bank,
in
dealing
with
the
public
must
exercise
the
highest
degree
of
diligence,
the
highest
degree
of
care
or
extra-ordinary
diligence.
The
diligence
of
an
ordinary
prudent
man,
or
ordinary
diligence,
is
not
enough.
The
reasons
for
the
strict
and
highest
standard
required
are
the
following:
(1)
the
business
of
banking
is
so
impressed
with
public
interest;
(2)
trust
and
confidence
of
the
public
in
general
is
of
paramount
interest,
and
(3)
the
fiduciary
nature
of
its
function.
With
particular
reference
to
deposits,
the
doctrine
is
a
bank
is
under
obligation
to
treat
the
accounts
of
its
depositors
with
meticulous
care,
always
having
in
mind
the
fiduciary
nature
of
their
relationship,
whether
such
account
consists
only
of
a
few
hundred
pesos
or
of
millions
of
pesos.
The
point
is
that
as
a
business
affected
with
public
interest
and
because
of
the
nature
of
its
functions,
the
bank
is
under
obligation
to
treat
the
account
of
its
depositors
with
meticulous
care,
always
having
in
mind
the
fiduciary
nature
of
their
relationship.
In
the
recent
case
of
Philippine
National
Bank
vs.
Court
of
Appeals,
we
held
that
a
bank
is
under
obligation
to
treat
the
accounts
of
its
depositors
with
meticulous
care
whether
such
account
consists
only
of
a
few
hundred
pesos
or
of
millions
of
pesos.
Responsibility
arising
from
negligence
in
the
performance
of
every
kind
of
obligation
is
demandable.
While
petitioners
negligence
in
this
case
may
not
have
been
attended
with
malice
and
bad
faith,
nevertheless,
it
caused
serious
anxiety,
embarrassment
and
humiliation.
Hence
we
ruled
that
the
offended
party
in
said
case
was
entitled
to
recover
reasonable
moral
damages.
Q:
What
is
the
nature
of
the
depositor
bank
relationship?
A:
SECTION 2. Declaration of Policy. The State recognizes the vital role of banks in
providing an environment conducive to the sustained development of the national economy
and the fiduciary nature of banking that requires high standards of integrity and
performance.
It
is
impressed
with
public
interest
where
the
trust
and
confidence
of
the
public
in
general
is
of
paramount
importance
such
that:
1. The
appropriate
standard
of
diligence
must
be
very
high,
if
not
the
highest,
degree
of
diligence;
highest
degree
of
care
(PCI
Bank
vs.
CA,
350
SCRA
446,
PBCom
vs.
CA,
G.R.
No.121413,
29
Jan.
2001)
>>
This
applies
only
to
cases
where
banks
are
acting
in
their
fiduciary
capacity,
that
is,
as
depository
of
the
deposits
of
their
depositors (Reyes
vs.
CA,
G.R.
No.118492,
15
Aug.
2001)
2.
Subject
to
reasonable
regulation
under
the
police
power
of
the
state
Q:
Reconcile
the
situation
where
in
a
combination
account
(deposit
and
current/checking
account),
an
officer
of
the
bank
is
not
alert
enough
to
transfer
funds
from
the
deposit
account
to
the
current
account
which
leads
to
the
dishonoring
of
the
check
issued
by
the
depositor
in
BP
22
cases.
A:
In PNB vs. CA & Pujol the depositor opened a checking account together with a savings
account under what is known as Combination Deposit Plan or Combo Account under
which checks drawn against the checking account shall be charged automatically against
the savings account. The operation and effectivity of the automatic transfer arrangement
(ATA) was however subject to the submission of certain documents, like business permit
and the like. Notwithstanding the non-submission of the documentary requirements the
bank staff already stamped on the passbook Combo Deposit Plan which led depositor to
believe that the ATA was already in effect. Depositor then issued two checks which the
bank dishonored for insufficiency of funds. In the suit for damages against the bank, the
Court ruled that PNB was in estoppel, i.e., estopped to deny the existence and perfection of
the ATA because by stamping Combo Deposit Plan on the passbook, depositor was led
to believe that the ATA was already effective. The Court ruled that a bank is under
obligation to treat the accounts of its depositors with meticulous care whether such account
consists a few hundred pesos or millions of pesos. The Court continued that while the
banks negligence may not have been attended by malice or bad faith, nevertheless it
caused serious anxiety, embarrassment and humiliation to the depositor which entitled her
to moral damages.
In Prudential Bank vs. CA & Valenzuela, 7 depositor maintained current and savings
accounts with automatic transfer arrangement. The bank misposted depositors check
deposit to the savings account for P35,993.48 made on June 1, 1988 to another account.
The mistake was corrected and credited only on June 24, or after 23 days. In the meantime,
a check issued by the depositor was dishonored for insufficiency
of funds. In awarding
damages in favor of the depositor, the Court ruled that the misposting of plaintiffs check
deposit to another account and the delayed posting of the same x x x is a clear proof of lack
of supervision on the part of the bank x x x while it may true that the banks negligence in
dishonoring the properly funded check x x x might not have been attended with malice and
bad faith, x x x nevertheless, it is the result of lack of due care and caution expected of an
employee of a firm engaged in so sensitive and accurately demanding task as banking.
Q:
When
a
bank
grants
a
securitized
or
collateralized
loan,
what
is
the
duty
of
the
bank
in
relation
to
the
Certificate
of
Title?
A:
It is the duty of the bank to confirm that the COT provided by the person applying for a
loan is clean, by comparing the title submitted to that which is in the Register of Deeds, in
order to verify the existence of tax liens, and/or adverse claims that may be attached to the
title. The bank also has the duty to register the mortgage/lien obtained by the person
applying for the same, in order to bind the land.
Q: Reconcile the law on secrecy of bank deposits and survivorship agreements with
regard to deposit accounts.
A: A survivorship agreement is an aleatory contract supported by a lawful consideration the mutual agreement of the joint depositors permitting either of them to withdraw the
whole during their lifetime, and transferring the balance to the survivor upon the death of
one of them. But while the survivorship agreement is per se not contrary to law, its
operation or effect may be violative of law where it is shown that such agreement is a mere
cloak to hide an inofficious donation to transfer property in fraud of creditors, or to defeat
the legitime of a forced heir.
Section 97, NIRC provide that If a bank has knowledge of the death of a person, who has a
deposit account with it alone or jointly with another, it must not allow any withdrawal from
said account, unless the Commissioner of Internal Revenue certified that the estate tax
thereon has been paid.
Considering that the joint account is co-owned by the depositors, there is a presumption
that they owned it equally or in 50/50 shares, in which case, the transfer of the remaining
balance of the whole deposit to the surviving co-depositor/s upon death of the other codepositor pursuant to their Survivorship Agreement is a transfer made by the said depositor
in contemplation of death, as provided under Section 85(B) of the 1997 Tax Code, viz:
(B) Transfer in Contemplation of Death To the extent of any interest therein of which
the decedent has at any time made a transfer, by trust or otherwise, in contemplation of or
intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after death, or of which he has at
any time made a transfer, by trust or otherwise, under which he has retained for his life or
for any period which does not in fact end before his death (1) the possession or enjoyment
of, or the right to the income from the property, or (2) the right, either alone or in
conjunction with any person, to designate the person who shall possess or enjoy the
property or the income therefrom; except in case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and
full consideration in money or moneys worth.
Thus, upon the death of the co-depositors, the 50% share of the deceased co-depositor in
the deposit shall be included in computing the value of his gross estate. Hence, the funds in
the joint deposit account cannot be withdrawn by the surviving co-depositor/s unless the
Commissioner has certified that the taxes imposed thereon by Title III of the 1997 Tax
Code have been paid; Provided, however, That the administrator of
the estate or any one (1) of the heirs of the deceased co-depositor may, upon the
authorization by the Commissioner, withdraw an amount not exceeding Twenty thousand
pesos (P20,000.00) without the said certification.
Section
97
does
not
apply
when
there
is
a
survivorship
agreement
between
the
co-
depositors
and
it
is
known
to
the
bank.
Q:
Provide
the
exceptions
to
RA
1405
(Secrecy
of
Bank
Deposits)
A:
Section
2
of
RA
1405
provides:
All
deposits
of
whatever
nature
with
banks
or
banking
institutions
in
the
Philippines
including
investments
in
bonds
issued
by
the
Government
of
the
Philippines,
its
political
subdivisions
and
its
instrumentalities,
are
hereby
considered
as
of
an
absolutely
confidential
nature
and
may
not
be
examined,
inquired
or
looked
into
by
any
person,
government
official,
bureau
or
office,
except
upon
written
permission
of
the
depositor,
or
in
cases
of
impeachment,
or
upon
order
of
a
competent
court
in
cases
of
bribery
or
dereliction
of
duty
of
public
officials,
or
in
cases
where
the
money
deposited
or
invested
is
the
subject
matter
of
the
litigation.
Q:
Discuss
the
duties
of
a
Trust
Entity
A:
SECTION 79. Authority to Engage in Trust Business. Only a stock corporation or a
person duly authorized by the Monetary Board to engage in trust business shall act as a
trustee or administer any trust or hold property in trust or on deposit for the use, benefit, or
behoof of others. For purposes of this Act, such a corporation shall be referred to as a trust
entity.
SECTION 80. Conduct of Trust Business. A trust entity shall administer the funds or
property under its custody with the diligence that a prudent man would exercise in the
conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with similar aims. No trust entity shall, for
the account of the trust or or the beneficiary of the trust, purchase or acquire property from,
or sell, transfer, assign or lend money or property to, or purchase debt instruments of, any
of the departments, directors, officers, stockholders, or employees of the trust entity,
relatives within the first degree of consanguinity or affinity, or the related interests, of such
directors, officers and stockholders, unless the transaction is specifically authorized by the
trust or and the relationship of the trustee and the other party involved in the transaction is
fully disclosed to the trust or or beneficiary of the trust prior to the transaction. The
Monetary Board shall promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to
exercised
by
the
trustee
are
defined
in
the
trust
agreement.
These
would
include
:
(1)
the
scope
or
extent
of
the
trustees
investment
powers;
(2)
the
beneficiaries;
(3)
the
terms
and
conditions
under
which
the
income
and/or
principal
of
the
trust
is
to
be
paid
or
to
be
disposed
of
ultimately.
Q:
Discuss
a
TRUST
BOND.
A:
SECTION 85. Bond of Certain Persons for the Faithful Performance of Duties.
Before an executor, administrator, guardian, trustee, receiver or depositary appointed by
the court enters upon the execution of his duties, he shall, upon order of the court, file a
bond in such sum, as the court may direct. Upon the application of any executor,
administrator, guardian, trustee, receiver, depositary or any other person in interest, the
court may, after notice and hearing, order that the subject matter of the trust or any part
thereof be deposited with a trust entity. Upon presentation of proof to the court that the
subject matter of the trust has been deposited with a trust entity, the court may order that
the bond given by such persons for the faithful performance of their duties be reduced to
such sums as it may deem proper: Provided, however, That the reduced bond shall be
sufficient to secure adequately the proper administration and care of any property
remaining under the control of such persons and the proper accounting for such property.
Property deposited with any trust entity in conformity with this Section shall be held by
such entity under the orders and direction of the court
CASES
1. SIMEX
INTERNATIONAL
(MANILA)
V.
CA
A
bank
may
be
held
liable
for
damages
by
reason
of
its
unjustified
dishonor
of
a
check,
which
caused
damage
to
its
clients
credit
standing.
The
bank
must
record
every
single
transaction
accurately,
down
to
the
last
centavo,
and
as
promptly
as
possible.
This
has
to
be
done
if
the
account
is
to
reflect
at
any
given
time
the
amount
of
money
the
depositor
can
dispose
of
as
he
sees
fit,
confident
that
the
bank
will
deliver
it
as
and
to
whomever
he
directs.
The
bank
is
a
fiduciary
of
the
depositors
money.
Facts:
Simex
International
is
a
private
corporation
engaged
in
the
exportation
of
food
products.
It
buys
these
products
from
various
local
suppliers
and
then
sells
them
abroad
to
the
Middle
East
and
the
United
States.
Most
of
its
exports
are
purchased
by
the
petitioner
on
credit.
Simex
was
a
depositor
of
the
Far
East
Savings
Bank
and
maintained
a
checking
account
in
its
branch
in
Cubao,
Quezon
City
which
issued
several
checks
against
its
deposit
but
was
surprised
to
learn
later
that
they
had
been
dishonored
for
insufficient
funds.
As
a
consequence,
several
suppliers
sent
a
letter
of
demand
to
the
petitioner,
threatening
prosecution
if
the
dishonored
check
issued
to
it
was
not
made
good
and
also
withheld
delivery
of
the
order
made
by
the
petitioner.
One
supplier
also
cancelled
the
petitioners
credit
line
and
demanded
that
10
Francos
account.
BPI
urges
us
that
the
legal
consequence
of
FMICs
forgery
claim
is
that
the
money
transferred
by
BPI
to
Tevesteco
is
its
own,
and
considering
that
it
was
able
to
recover
possession
of
the
same
when
the
money
was
redeposited
by
Franco,
it
had
the
right
to
set
up
its
ownership
thereon
and
freeze
Francos
accounts.
Issue:
WON
the
bank
has
a
better
right
to
the
deposits
in
Francos
account.
Held:
No.
Significantly,
while
Article
559
permits
an
owner
who
has
lost
or
has
been
unlawfully
deprived
of
a
movable
to
recover
the
exact
same
thing
from
the
current
possessor,
BPI
simply
claims
ownership
of
the
equivalent
amount
of
money,
i.e.,
the
value
thereof,
which
it
had
mistakenly
debited
from
FMICs
account
and
credited
to
Tevestecos,
and
subsequently
traced
to
Francos
account.
Money
bears
no
earmarks
of
peculiar
ownership,
and
this
characteristic
is
all
the
more
manifest
in
the
instant
case
which
involves
money
in
a
banking
transaction
gone
awry.
Its
primary
function
is
to
pass
from
hand
to
hand
as
a
medium
of
exchange,
without
other
evidence
of
its
title.
Money,
which
had
been
passed
through
various
transactions
in
the
general
course
of
banking
business,
even
if
of
traceable
origin,
is
no
exception.
BPI
v.
CA
[G.R.
No.
104612,
May
10,
1994]
DAVIDE,
JR.,
J.
FACTS:
Private
respondents
Eastern
and
Lim,
an
officer
and
stockholder
of
Eastern,
held
at
least
one
joint
bank
account
with
the
Commercial
Bank
and
Trust
Co.
(CBTC),
the
predecessor-in-interest
of
petitioner
BPI.
Sometime
in
March
1975,
a
joint
checking
account
("and"
account)
with
Lim
in
the
amount
of
P120,000.00
was
opened
by
Mariano
Velasco.
When
Velasco
died,
an
Indemnity
Undertaking
was
executed
by
Lim
for
himself
and
as
President
and
GM
of
Eastern,
wherein
one-half
of
the
outstanding
balance
was
provisionally
released
and
transferred
to
one
of
the
bank
accounts
of
Eastern
with
CBTC.
Later
on,
Eastern
obtained
a
loan
of
P73,000.00
from
CBTC
as
"Additional
Working
Capital,"
evidenced
by
the
"Disclosure
Statement
on
Loan/Credit
Transaction".
The
loan
was
payable
on
demand
with
interest
at
14%
per
annum.
For
this
loan,
Eastern
issued
on
the
same
day
a
negotiable
promissory
note
which
was
signed
by
Lim
both
in
his
own
capacity
and
as
President
and
General
Manager
of
Eastern.
No
reference
to
any
security
for
the
loan
appears
on
the
note.
In
addition,
Eastern
and
Lim,
and
CBTC
signed
another
document
entitled
"Holdout
Agreement,"
wherein
it
was
stated
that
as
security
for
the
Loan
[Lim
and
Eastern]
have
offered
[CBTC]
and
the
latter
accepts
a
holdout
on
said
Current
Account
in
the
joint
names
of
Lim
and
Velasco.
After
CBTC
was
merged
with
BPI,
BPI
filed
a
complaint
against
Lim
and
Eastern
demanding
payment
of
the
promissory
note
for
P73,000.00.
Defendants
Lim
and
Eastern,
in
turn,
filed
a
counterclaim
against
BPI
for
the
return
of
the
balance
in
the
disputed
account
subject
of
the
Holdout
Agreement
and
the
interests
thereon
after
deducting
the
amount
due
on
the
promissory
note.
ISSUE:
Whether
BPI
can
demand
payment
of
the
loan
of
P73,000.00
despite
the
existence
of
the
Holdout
Agreement.
Whether
or
not
BPI
is
still
liable
to
the
private
respondents
on
the
account
subject
of
the
Holdout
Agreement
after
its
withdrawal
by
the
heirs
of
Velasco.
HELD:
The
deposit
under
the
questioned
account
was
an
ordinary
bank
deposit;
hence,
it
was
payable
on
demand
of
the
depositor.
When
the
ownership
of
a
particular
property
is
disputed,
the
determination
by
a
probate
court
of
whether
that
property
is
included
in
the
estate
of
a
deceased
is
merely
provisional
in
character
and
cannot
be
the
subject
of
execution.
The
payment
of
the
money
deposited
with
BPI
that
will
extinguish
its
obligation
to
the
creditor-depositor
is
payment
to
the
person
of
the
creditor
or
to
one
authorized
by
him
or
by
the
law
to
receive
it.
Payment
made
by
the
debtor
to
the
wrong
party
does
not
extinguish
the
obligation
as
to
the
creditor
who
is
without
fault
or
negligence,
even
if
the
debtor
acted
in
utmost
good
faith
and
by
mistake
as
to
the
person
of
the
creditor,
or
through
error
induced
by
fraud
of
a
third
person
BPI
v.
Roxas
GR
157833
Macalinao
vs.
BPI
GR
175490
11