Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 37

Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information

Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to
information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities,
in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority,
and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest
to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of
education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the
timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.
1 +, 1 +

01 ' 5

The Right to Information, The Right to Live

Step Out From the Old to the New

Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan

Jawaharlal Nehru

IS 12065 (1987): Permissible limits of noise level for


rotating electrical machines [ETD 15: Rotating Machinery]

! $ ' +-
Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda

Invent a New India Using Knowledge

! > 0 B

BharthariNtiatakam

Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen

IS :12066-1987

Indian Standard

( Reaffirmed 2004 )

PERMISSIBLE LIMITS OF NOISE LEVEL; FOR


ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINES
( Second

UDC

BUREAU
MANAK

Reprint APRIL 1997 )

- 13 : 5341835.46*004*121

621.313

OF
BHAVAN,

INDIAN
9

BAHADUR

NBW

Gr

DBLHI,

STANDARD8
SHAH

ZAFAR

MARO

110002

December 1987

IS : 12065- 1987

Indian Standard
PERMISSIBLE LlMITS OF NOISE LEVELS FOR
ROTATlNG ELECTRICAL MACHINES
Rotating

Machinery

Sectional

Committee,

ETDC

15

Representing

Chairman
Indian Electrical
Association,

SHRI S. G. RAMACHANDRA

and Electronics
Bombay

Manufacturers

Dir G. M. PAADKZ ( Alternateto


Shri S. G. Ramachandra
)
Directorate
General
of Supplies
& Disposals,
SHRI R. S. AROI<.A
New Delhi
SHW K. L. GARB ( AIlcrrrafe )
Guest, Keen, Williams Ltd, Bombay
SHBI P. R. BAPAT
SHRI A. S. ABHYANKAR ( Alternate )
General Electric Co of India Ltd, Calcutta
SHRI A. t%AsU
SHRI P. MAJUM~AX ( Alternate )
Central Public Works Department,
New Delhi
CHIEB EN~INEEK (E), II
SUUVEYOR

OF WOllKS

11 ( dk7lQ!L

Bharat Bijlee Ltd, Bombay


G. DEYHMUKU
SHXI A. V. BHAUC~AO ( Alternate )
Central Electricity Authority, New Delhi
D~nxcroa
\ H. T. D. 1 )
DEPUTY
DIRECTOR ( H. T. D. 1 ) ( AIfmuztc)
Walchandnagar
Industries Ltd, Walchandnagar
SHRI A. G. DOSHI
SHIII S. S. KULKAXNI ( Alternate )
Rural Electrification
Corporation Ltd, new Delhi
SHXI
G. L. DUA
SHW S. K. SBTHI ( Allenrate )
Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, Bangalore
Snnr M. GANDSH
SHNI
N. i\. JANAILDAN RAO ( Altwnat~ 1 j
Smcr K. V. MANJUNATH ( Alfcrnate II )
Steel Authority of India Ltd, New Delhi
SURI
A. GANO:JLI
SHI~I K. NalraYANAN
( Alfrrnnte )
Siemens India Ltd, Bombay
DR S. N. GHOSII
S~IRI V. RAMASWAMY ( Altcrnat~ j
STANDAKDS Railway Board ( Ministry of Railways )
DIRECTOR
JOINT
( ELECT )-3
ASVISTANT DIRECTOR ( ELECT ) B-2
( Alfcrmzte )
( Continued on page 2 )
SHHI

S.

Q Copyright
BUREAU

OF INDIAN

1987
STANDARDS

This
publication is protected under the Indian Copurizht Act ( XIV of 1957 ) and
reproduction in whole or in part by any means except with written permission of the
p;bli&er
shall be deemed to be an infringement
of copyright under the said Act.

IS:12065 - 1987

Mtwbers
Rsprcrenting
Jyoti Ltd, Vadodara
SIIIII D. K. KULXARNI
Srirtr P. L. PRAUHAN
( Alfernntr
)
Millowners Association, Bombay
SHKI
C.
B. MO~IWAL~~
SHRI
R. G. DESHMUKH ( Alternate )
National Test House, Calcutta
SHRI
l3. IMUKHOPAvHYAY
SHRI
SANATH
KUMAR
( Allernale)
Army Headquarters,
Ministry of Defeence,. New
SHIRI A. S. NAQ
Delhi
SII~I H. S. PANESAR ( Alfernale )
Directorate
of Standardization,
Ministry
of
LT-COL A. R. NAMBIAR
Defence ( DGI ), New Delhi
MAJ J. SEBASTIAN ( Alternate)
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. _ Hyderabad
SHRI
SHIV NAILAYAN
SARI C. K. MOHA~ SASTRY ( Alterrrafc I )
SRRI S. S. RAO ( AlternateII )
Hindustao Brown Boveri Ltd, Vadodara
Dn M. S. PADBIDKI
SHR~ M. RA~~~KRI~ENA RAO (Alternate )
Crompton Greaves Ltd, Bombay
SHKI
D. P. PATEL
SHRI C. P. DUSAD ( Alrernare )
Tata Consulting Engineers, Bombay
SH~I A. D. RANQNERAR
SIIKI M. E. REDDY ( Alternate)
Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, New Delhi
SHRI SATCHIDANAND
SHRI
Y. P. SINGH
( Alternate )
NGEF Ltd, Bangalore
Sanr S. L. SRI~HA~AMURTRY
SHRI
H. A. P. IYEa ( Alternnfc )
Directorate General of Technical Development,
S,.IRI ,I. M. Unrn
New Delhi
Director General, BIS ( Ex-o,@io Member )
Sun1 s. P. SncIrnEv,
Director ( Illec tech )
Secretary
SHILI R. K. MON~A
Joint Director ( Elcc tech ), BIS
Industrial

Motors

Subcommittee,

ETDC

15 ; 1

Conuenrr
DR S. N. G~OSH

Siemens India Ltd, Bombay

Members
SHRI V. RAXASWAMY. ( Alternate to
Dr S. N. Ghosh )
Bharat Heavy Electricalr Ltd, Hydernbad
Ssltr R. IS. A~~ARWAL
SHRI
M. H. JABRI ( Altsrnate I ) _
SHILI M. R. EKBOTE ( Altcrnatc II )
General Electric Co of India Ltd, Calcutta
Snnr A. BASU
SERI P. MAZUMDAB ( Alt~rnatr )
Directorate General of Supplies & Disposala, New
SHRX J. L. CHHABRA
Delhi
DEPUTY D~REOTOR OF INSPECTION
( Altsrnatc )
( Confinued on pogr 30 )

IS:12065 - 1987

Indian Standard
PERMISSIBLE LIMITS OF NOJSE LEVELS FOR
ROTATING ELECTRICAL
MACHINES
0.

FOREWORD

0.1 This Indian Standard was adopted


by the Indian
Standards Instituafter the draft finalized by the Rotating
tion on 28 January
1987,
Machinery
Sectional Committee
had been approved by the Electrotechnical Division Council.
0.2 The methods
of measurement
selected from IS : 6098-1971*.

used

in

this

standard

0.3 This standard intends to establish


the limits of maximum
airborne noise levels emitted by rotating electrical machines.

have

been

permissible

0.4 Acoustic quantities can be expressed in sound pressure terms or sound


power terms.
The use of sound-power
level, whirh can be specified
independently
of the measurement
surface and environmental
conditions,
avoids the complications
associated
with sound pressure levels,
which
additional
data to be specified. Sound-power
levels provide a
require
measure of radiated energy and have advantages
in acoustic analysis and
derign.
Sound-pressure
levels at a distance from the machine may be required
in some applications,
such as hearing
protection
programmes.
It was
agreed that this standard was only concerned
with the physical aspects of
noise, to express limits in terms of sound power and not to give gui.dance
for calculation of sound-pressure
levels at a distance,
derived from sound
power values.
These
calculations
require
knowledge
of machine
size,
operating conditions and the environment
in which it is installed.
Indications for such calculations
taking into account environmental
factors could
be found, if needed, in classical text books on acoustics.
0.3 In the preparation
the following:
BS

of this standard,

assistance

has been

4999 : Part 51:1973 Specification


for general
rotating electrical
machinery:
Part 51 Noise
the British Standards
Institution
( UK )

*Methods
machinery.

of

measurement

of the

airborne

noise

emitted

derived

from

requirements
levels, issued

by

rotating

for
by

electrical

IS:12065

- 1987
IEC Irrl) 0~1-9 ( 1972 ) Rotating
electrical
machines
limits, issued by the International
Electrotechnical

: Part 9 Noise

Dot : 2 (Sectt),
684, IEC
Draft Revision
of Pub.
Rotating
electrical
Machines:
Part 9 : Noise
by the International
Electrotechnical
Commission

34-9 ( 1972 ) :
Limits,
issued
( IEC ).

Commission.

0.6 For the purpose of deciding


whether a particular
requirement
of this
standard is complied with, the final value, observed or calculated
expressshall be rounded
off in
accordance
with
ing the result of a test,
IS : 2-1960*.
The number of significant places retained
in the rounded off
value should be the same as that of the specified value in this standard.

1. SCOPE
1.1 This Indian Standard
specifies methods of measuring and classifying
the acoustic noise emitted
by rotating
electrical
machines
( excluding
small power machines and machines for traction vehicles ) on no-load,
1.2 A noise classification
in terms of dB (A) sound power level is given.
Methods are also included for correcting for the presence of pure tones.
I.3 Upper limits
MW are given in
sent given iu this
the manufacturer

of dB (A) sound power level for machines rated up to 16


Appendix D. Limits for larger machines are not at prestandard
and should, therefore,
be agreed to between
and the purchaser.

1.4 Recommendations
are included
ing noise from machines on load.

in Appendix

B for methods

of assess-

1.5 This standard covers measurements


normally made in free field conditions.
Where
free-field
conditions
cannot,
in practice,
be achieved,
recommendations
are given in Appendix
C for measurements
made in
semi-reverberant
conditions.
2. TERMS

AND DEFINITIONS

2.0 For the purpose


2.1

Sound Pressure

20 log,,

$-decibels

and p is the reference

of this standard
Level
(dB)

L where

the following
The sound

definitions

pressure

p is the measured

rms sound pressure

level is defined
rms

sound

of 2 x 10-s N/ms (Pa).

*Rules for rounding off numerical values ( r&red ).


4

shall apply.
by

pressure

tS :12065-1987
2.2 Sound Level -

The

where /I~ is the rms


weighted in accordance
NOTE always

Sound
to be stated)

sound level in ( dB ) is defined

by 20 log,,

-$

sound pressure due to the sound being measured


with the curves A, B and C ( see IS : 9779-1981
).

Icvels are expressed


in dB ( the weighting
curve used is
[for example, sound level A - x dB, or sound level = Y dB (A) 1.

2.3 Noise Spectrum


A spectrum
showing the sound pressure level
distribution
throughout
the frequency
range.
The appearance
of the
spectrum depends upon the filter band width characteristics
of the analyzer
used.
2.4 Band Pressure Level For a specified frequency
band, the effcctive unweighted
sound pressure level corresponding
to the sound energy
contained within the band.
Sound Power

2.5

Level

L,

10 log10

The

-w

sound power

level is defined

as:

in decibels
0

where
W

measured

W. = reference

sound power

( watts ); and

sound power expressed

W. is eclual to lO-ls

in the saxne

unit

as

W;

watt ( or 1 pW ).

NOTIC--LWA is a weighted
sound power level determined
in such a manner that
the acoustic power level in each of the frequency
band is weighted
accordrng to the
(A) scale.

Prescribed

2.6

in this standard

Path An imaginary
line around the machine as given
and along which the measurement
points are located.

No~li: - As this standard covers


electrical
machines of all shapes and sizes, it
was f;oirnd irnl)racticable
to define a prescribed
path as given in IS : 475%1968T.
The prescribed paths are defined which can be lrsed in all cases.
2.7 Equivalent
Hemisphere
r A hypothetical
hemisphere
surroundare assumed to be made, its
ing the rnechine
on which
the measurements
radius
being denoted by rs and whose crntre is in the plane of the floor.

of measurement
Background
Noise -- Any noise at the points
than that of the machine
being tested. It also includes the noise of
any test equipmant.

2.8

other

2.9 Acceptability
Rating An (A)
corrected for the presence of pure tones.
*Specification
for sound level meters.
iMethods
of measurement
of noise emitted

weighted

by machine.

sound

power

lrvel

IS:

12065-

1987

3. TEST METHOD

3.0 This clause

describes the procedure to be used to establish the (Aj


weighted
sound power level of the machine.
It is a\sumed that the
machine
is a noise source radiating in free-field conditions over a reflecting plane which is considered
as its base.
Where
free-field
conditions
cannot in practice be achieved, the method may still be used but the sound
power level obtained will be slightly higher.
No correction shall be made
in this respect,
3.0.1 The (A) weighted sound power levels determined
in accordance
with test method I shall not exceed those given in Appendix D appropriate
to the rated output, speed and type of enclosure.
3.0.2 In all cases where the (A) weighted
sound power level of a
machine
is grrater
than 93 dB (A) or one or more tones are prominent,
noise measurements shall be made in accordance with Test Method II
( see 4 ).
3.1 Test Conditions
3.1.1 Test Environment
ment shall first be ascertained
detailed in 3.3.1.

- The s&ability
of any given test environby making
a test of room suitability
as

3.1.2 Background Noise - The background noise reading when the


machine
is not on test shall be determined
at the same points as for the
test. The reading at each point with the machine on test ought to exceed
that due to the background
alone by at least 10 dB. When the differences
are less than 10 dB, corrections
can be obtained from the background
correction
curve shown in Fig. 1.
3.1.2.1
follows.

Alternatively,

the background

correction

may

be

made

as

3.1.2.2
Using the table in Appendix E, find the number in column 2
corresponding
to the total noise level in column 1 and subtract from this
the number
in column 2 corresponding
to the background
level. The
result of this subtraction
will correspond,
in column 2, to the source level
in column I, rounded to the nearest whole number or whole number plus
0.5 dB ( see example 3, Appendix A ) .
3.1.2.3
In the case of rapidly fluctuating
background
noise a difference of 10 dB between the maximum background
level and the machine
on test is essential.
3.1.2.4
When corrections
of 3 dB or greater
ted levels should be indicated in brackets.
6

are

applied,

the correc-

IS:12065 - 1987

5
L
3
2
1
0

"
3

bB INCREASE

Fro.

than

IN NOISE LEVEL
BY MACHINE

1 BACKOROUNI) Noxm

10

CAUSED

CORRECTION CURVE

3.1.2.5
When the increase
in noise level due to the machine
3 dB, measurements,
in general cases to have any significance.

3.1.3 Operating
test, the .following

Conditions of Machine on Test conditions shall be observed:

shall be run
a) The machine
shall be run at unity power
machine
b) The
uncoupled;

shall

be

on no-load.
factor;

in

its

For the purpose


Synchronous

fully-assembled

is less
of the

m.achines

condition,

and

c) ac machines shall be supplied at rated voltage and frequency;


shall be run as nearly as possible at rated speed, or at
d) Machines
the highest speed in the range, if there is a speed range; and
designed
to operate
e) Machines
shall be tested at each speed.

at two or more

discrete

speeds

3.1.4 Mounting of Machine-Structure


borne vibrations from a machine to
or other parts of the test room, can influence the sound
its mounting,
It is permissible to minimize such effects
pressure
level in the test room.
by, for example,
mounting
the machine
on suitably designed resilient
mountings.
7

IS : 12065 - 1987
3.2 Measuring

Instruments

3.2.1 Grade The sound level meter shall comply with the requirements of IS : 97i9-1981*
and shall be used on the (A) weighted scale.
3.2.1.1
Instructions
on the use of the equipment shall be
with to ensure that the intended degree of precision is realized.

complied

3.2.2 Checking of Measuring Equipment - An acoustic check of the sound


level measuring
equipment and at least one band of the analyzing
equipment shall be made immediately
before and after making the machine
noise measurements.
These
site checks shall be supplemented
by more
detailed laboratol y calibrations
of the whole measuring equipment made
at least once every two years.
3.2.3 Location of Instruments and Observer The sound level meter case
and any measuring. amplifiers
or filters shall be at least 0.3 m from the
microphone,
and the observer at least 1 m from the microphone,
to prevent
errors due to reflections
from these objects, The calibration
axis of the
microphone
should be pointed normal to the enveloping
surface of the
machine.
3.2.3.1
In the case of portable
or hand-held
sound level meters
having integral microphone or other
instrument,
it shall be held steadily
by the observer at arms length ( stretched hands ) and at a suitable angle
convenient for talcing accurate observations
on the meter.
The method
described
in this clause is
3.3 Test Measurements
applicable
to the measurement
of sound radiation
in a free field over a
reflecting
plane. This is the standard environment
for noise tests made in
accordance
with this standard.
Where conditions depart significantly
from free-field conditions,
the
method described
for semi-reverberant
field conditions
may be used by
agreement between the manufacturer
and the purchaser.
The room suitability shall be establi3.3.1
Test of Room Suitability
shed by placing a small broad-band
noise source ( preferably non-aerodynamic ) at the position to be occupied
by the geometric
centre of the
machine
to be tested, and determining
the mean sound level at the
measurement
positions and at corresponding
positions at half their distance
from the source, The difference between these mean sound pressure levels
at full and half distance should be at least 5 dB for each frequency band
employed.
Calculation
of the mean values shall be made in accordance
with 3.4.1. For large machines
such a test cannot always be performed.
In such cases this fact should be stated in the test report.
If the machine on test is sufficiently
small with respect
to the size of
NOTE the room and of broad-band
noise character,
it may be taken as a reference source.

___.___._-,*Specification for sound level meters.

IS : 12065- 1987
3.3.2 Method of Measurement - For all machines, measurements
shall be
made on the prescribed
paths shown in Fig. 2, 3 or 4. For machines
linear dimension
1 ( excluding
shaft ) equal to or
having a maximum
exceeding
0.25 m these rectilinear paths are, at their nearest points, 1 m
from the distance of the mat hine.
For cases where 1 is less than 0.25 nr,
these rectilinear
paths are at their nearest points at a distance from the
surface of the machine between 41 and 1 m but not less than 0.25 m. For
all horizontal
machines
the prescribed
path parallel
to the reflecting
ground plane should be at shaft height or 0.25 m, whichever is greater
( see Fig. 2 ). For vertical machines, the prescribed
path parallel
to the
reflecting ground plane shall be at half the height of the machine but not
less than a height of 0.25 m ( see Fig. 4 ). The prescribed path in the vertical plane may be in, or parallel to, the plane of the shaft.
The positions of the measurement
3.3.3 Location of Measurement Points points (the number of which depends upon the size ofthe machine and the
symmetry of the acoustic
radiation,
but should be at least five ) should be
as indicated in Fig. 2, 3 or 4.
The
more than

measurement
points on each path should be at intervals
1 m from the five key measurement
points.

of not

If measurements
at these points indicate
levels which exceed the
mean level.( calculated
in accordance
with 3.4.1 ) by more than 5 dB,
additional
points should be added midway between all the measurement
pattel n of the
points already in use. In some cases the acoustic radiation
The extra paths shall maintain
mechine
requires the use of extra paths.
the basic symmetry of the measurement
points.
3.3.4 Quantities to be Determined - At each measurement
point the sound
level in dB(A)
is measured.
The measurements
at each point should be
corrected for the effects of any background
noise ( see 3.1.2 ). Any corrections indicated by the calibration
checks shall also be taken into account.
3.3.4.1
environment.
3.4

Evaluation

No other
of Test

correction

shall

be applied

for

the

effects

of test

Measurement

3.4.1 Calculation of the Meaz Sound Level (A) - The mean sound level (A)
shall be calculated from the results of the measurements
at all the test
positions, after correction
in accordance
with 3.1.2,
k)y averaging
as
follows:
I ,A2
L
antiloglo -+
+ antiloglo -lu
+,..
L*hl=
10 log10
-+
I:
(
+antiloglo

-i<!--

>I .-.I.(I)

IS : 12065 - 1987
where
L.\M = mt:all sound level (A) (dll);
L,\j = sound level (A) at the first measurement
LAG =

sao;;d

12 =

level (A) at

ntmil)cr

the

01 mc:isurrment

nth measurement

positions

(dB);

positions

(dB);

positions.

Norl: 1 - Whc~n th(, till readings at the various measurement points do


not ditfvr by mow than 5 dU, an arithmetic average of the dU r, adings may
lw used. This will give a result difffaring by not more than 07 dB from that
given in r,qllation (I).
No,w 2 - TIM: application
of .equation (1) is facilitated
Appendix I5 ( SPL
Example 1, Appendix A ).

by the use of

3.4.2 Calculation qjthe Iiarfius qf theEquivalent Hemisphere For the purpose of calculation of the (A) Lvcighted sound power level of the machine,
the nleasuremcut
made along the prescribed paths of Fig. 2, 3 and 4 shall
be assumed to have been made over a hemisphere of radius Y,; where

......

(2)

where

a, b and c xc

;IS indicated

in Fig.

NOI,E - Illis exprersicrn for 18 is irnpirical


from any particular
I~~CL~S~FCIII~
nr surf.lcr.

2, 3 and 4.

and dots

not

ptrrp~~rtto bc derived

3.4.3 CdcuIu~ion a_[ (:I) zteighted Suuud Pomrr


Level The (A) weighted
sound power 11,vc:Iok the machine
can be calculated
using the expression
below or tlie curve in I;ig. 5:
2 x r;
I -,v,\ ::- L Am -t

10 log10 --s-0

._. . . . (3)

where
L wA =
S,
4. TEST

(A)

weighted

reference

METHOD

sound power level, and

area of 1 m2,

IX

4.0 These
analysis

tests include detailed


measurements
based on frequency
of sound radiation in a free field over a reflecting plane.

band

4.0.1 Where free-field conditinns cannot, in practice,


be achieved,
the
method may still be used but the sound power level will be slightly higher
than that obtainccl undtr free-field conditions.
Alternatively,
the method
described in Appendix C for semi-reverberant
conditions
may be used.

10

IS:12065 -1987

0)

b)

VERTICAL

PLANE

HORIZONTAL

cl ISOMETRIC

VIEW

@ =
x
FIG.

PLANE

Key measuring points.


Mc~suring points.

LOCATION

HORIZONTAL

OF MEA~URINC

MACHINES

WITII

A-UAI,

POINTS

AND PRESCRIBED

T,ENGTII

t-0 TIIE WIDTit

GREATER

PATHS FOR

IIIAN

OR EQITAT.

IS t 12065- 1987
F-----X--a) VERTICAL

b)HORIZONTAL

PL ANE

PLANE

c) ISOMETRIC

r-

VIEW

@ = Key measuring
x =

Measuring

points.
points.

Fro.
3 LOCATION OF MEASURINGPCXNTS AND PRESCRIBEDPATHS FOR
H~RRONTAL MACHINESWITH AXIAL LENGTH SHORTERTIIAN THE WIDTH

12

IS : 12065- 1987
a)

VERTICAL

PLANE

PLANE

b) HORIZONTAL

c)

ISOMETRIC

NOTE -

II =

@I =
x =
F;IG. 4

VIEW

p:

but not less than 025 m.

Key meawring
points.
Measuring points.

LIXATION

OF

MEASURING POINTS AND PRESCRIBED PATHS FOR


VEIUICAL
MACHINES

13

IS:12065 - 1987

w,
VI

Fro. 5

VARIATION OF 10 loglo

(2753
s

WLTHrs

4.0.2
machine
than 93
shall be
4.1 Test
I
I

In all cases where the (A) weighted sound power level of a


measured in accordance with Test Method I ( see3 ) is greater
dB (A) or one or more tones are prominent,
noise measurements
made in accordance with this section.
Conditions

4.1.1

Test Environment -

4.1.2

Background Noise -

See 3.1.1.

As in 3.1.2 for each octave band.

4.1.3 Operating Conditions of Machines on Test 4.1.4


4.2

Mounting of Machine

Measuring

See 3.1.3.

See 3.1.4.

Instruments

4.2.1 Grade - The sound level meter shall comply with IS : 9779in the use of the equipment shall be complied
1981*. The instructions
with to ensure that the intended degree ofprecision is realized. The meter
shall be used on linear response or on (C) weighting for frequency
analysis.
*Specification

for sound

level

meters.

14

IS:
4.2.1.1 Octave and one-third octave band pass filters
analysis shall comply with-IS : 6C6&1-1973*.
4.2.2

Checking

of Measuring

Equipment -

12065-

used for

1987
noise

See 3.2.2.

4.3 Test Measurements


- The method described
in this clause is applicable to the measurement
of sound radiation
in a free field over a rellecting plane. This is the standard
environment
for noise tests made in
accordance
with this standard.
4.3.0 Where conditions depart significantly
from free
the method described for semi-reverberant
field conditions
agreement
between the manufacture
and the purchaser.
4.3.1

Test of Room Suitability -

See 3.3.1.

4.3.2

Method of Measurement -

See 3.3.2.

4.3.3

Location of Measurement Points -

field conditions,
may be used by

See 3.3.3,

4.3.4 Quantities to be Determined The followjing quantities


shall be
determined
at each of the measurement
points in accordance
with 4.3.2:
a,) Sound
b)

level in dB (A);

and

levels in the octave bands centred on 63 to


Band sound pressure
8 000 Hz with the sound level meter set to linear response or (C)
weighting.
Where linear response is not available, (C) weighting
is sufficiently close to linear
response over the above frequency
range.

At each mcasurcment
point the sound level in dB (A) is measured.
The measurerncnt
at each point should be correctrd for the effects on any
background
noise (see 3.1.2).
Any correction
indicated
by the calibration
checks shall also be taken into account.
Unless it has been agreed to use
the semireverberant
method ( see Appendix C ), no other correction
shall
be applied for the effects of test environment.
4.4

Evaluation

of Test Measurement

4.4.1 Calculation of Octave Band Mean Sound Pressure Level -- The mean
sound pressure levels for each octave band shall he calculated from the
results of the measurements
at all the test positions ( after correcting
for
background
noise in accordance
with 3.1.2 ) by averaging
in accordance
with equation (4).
1
L
L
antilogrP L PM = 10 log,,,
__
+ ant@90
--$
+
...
+
n
1;;
r
(
L
antilog10 #*Octave,
vibrations.

half-octave

>I,

and third-octave

band filters for analysis

15

of sound

and

IS:12865

- 1987

where
L pm =
L p1 =

octave

band

mean

sound pressure

L Pn -

octave band sound


point (dB); and

number

octave band sound


ment point (dB);

pressure
pressure

of measurement

level (dB) ;

level
level

at the first measureat

nth measurement

points.

NOTR I - If f octave readings are taken, the band energy


levels to be summed in groups ofthree on an energy basis to
obtain the octave band levels in accordance with equation(5).

10 lOgI,

L pi =

L,(i-1,

-mlo~-

antilog,,

antilogIs

>:z-

LsU+l,
-__
10
1

antiloglo
where
L pi =

calculated
sound
(dB);

full

pressure

octave
level

band
in

sound pressure
the

( j-

J&1-,,

LW

sound pressure

level in thejth

Q octave

==

sound pressure

level in the (j+

~)th& octave

L3U+1)

level (dB);

I )th 4 octave
band

band

(dB);
band

and
(dB).

NOTE 2 - When the dB reading at the various measurement points do not differ by more than 5 dB, an artithmetic
average of the dB readings may be used. This will give a
result differing by not more than Ct.7 dB from that given in
equation (4).
NOTE
3 - The application
of equation (4) is facilitated
by the use of Appendix E ( SCLexample 1, Appendix A ).

4.4.2

Calculation

4.4.3

Calculation

of the Mean Sound Level (A) of the Radius of the Equivalent

See 3.4.1.

Hemisphere -

See 3.4.2.

4.4.4 Evaluation of the Octave Band Mean Sound Power Levels - The
band mean sound power level may be calculated directly from the
band mean sound pressure levels using equation (6).

16

octave
octave

IS : 12065 - 1987
where
L,

octave

Iland mean sound power level re. 10-1s watts (dB);

L pm =

octave

l)and mean sound prrssurc

So =

a reference

area

lcvcl (lb);

and

of 1 m3.

4.4.4.1 Equation (6) holds for an ambient


barometric
pressure of 9.8 X 1(I4 N/m2 (Pa).

temperature

of 20C

and

NOTE-Over
the tcmpcratllrr
rnngc 0 to 40C and over the range of barocorrection
for
mrtric
pwss~~rc from 9.0 x 10 to I(!(; x 10 N/m2 (Pa), possible
ambient
condition\
is not grpatt,r than -1. 0.5 dU. For ths rcason,
such a correction
has bcltn ornittc~d.

4.4.5 Emhz/ion
qf the Octme hm/
Mmz
(A)
Wei,qShted Smlnd Pressure
Levels - The octave band meal1 SOW:~ I?rcsllrc
lrvels
dc can he converted
into equivalent octave Ixrntl (A) \vrightr,d sound pressure levels by applying the following wcightin~ corr-cctiolr:;:

39

fi,:;

2G

12.5

16

2.50

500

21.5

1 000
2 000

-I-

4 000

+
-

1
1

8 000

4.4.6 Evaluation of the Octave Band Mean (A) Weighted Saund Pou:er LcvelsThe octave and mcan (A) weighted sound power levrls may he calculated
from the derived octave band mean (A) wt+hted
sound levels using
equation (3) in 3.4.3 and changing the symbols from total to octave band
values.
4.4.7 Evaluation of Acceptalili(,v Rating From the results of the (A)
weighted octave band sound power level evaluation,
the difference between
the sound power level in each octave band judged to contain a pure tone
or pure tones and thr average level in the adjacent bands is calculated.
17

IS:12065

- 1987

4.4.7.1 The acceptability


rating is obtained
tion K to the till (A) sound power level measured
Method I.
4.4.7.2

When

a pure tone is in an octave band


K-c

When

by applying the correcin accordance


with Test
above

2.70 Hz:

the pure tone is in the octave

band equal to or below

250 Hz:

K+When
D is the greatest positive difference
between
the (A) weighted
sound power level in any octave band containing
a pure tone or pure
tones, and the mean (A) weighted sound power level of the adjacent
octave bands.
NATE - The mran (A) weighted sound power level of the adjacent
be deduced using the table of Appendix E.

bands should

4.4.7.3 The corrected value of (A) weighted sound power level is the
value used in comparison with the specified limit, and it shall not exceed
the appropriate value given in Appendix D.
5. PRESENTATION
5.1 Result
information
with 3:

OF RESULTS

of Tests in Accordance
with Method I The following
and test results shall be noted for all tests in accordance

a)

Reference

b)

Test

to this Indian

Standard

--

Ref ISS

12065;

on room suitability;

c) Description
operation;

of

the

machine,

its

conditions

of installation

and

sketch of the test room showing the location of the


d) Dimensioned
machine and any significant objects in the immediate vicinity;
e)

Meteorological
conditions
humidity
( C )9 relative
[Nms (Pa)];

f ) Make, model and serial


g) Position of measurement
h) Results
point;
.i)

of sound

Background

sound

level
level

of test, namely, ambient


temperature
( percent ) and barometric
pressure

number
points

of sound level meter


relative

measurements
(A)

at each

used;

to machine;
(A)

at each

measuwment

measurement
point;

PS: 12065k) Rc:!~ulls of corrected


measurement
point;
III) Radius
n) Mean

7H

and

sound

area

level

sound

rneasuremcnt~

S of the cquivalcnt

power

level

(A)

Irc*mislrlrcrcs;

at

1987
each

:irlti

(A).

5.2 Results of Tests in Accordance with Method


11 IXe f~~llowing information
and test results shall be noted
for all tests in accordance
with 4:
a) Reference
b) Test

to this Indian

on room

c) Description
operation;
d)

Standard

suitability
of

the

( see 3.3.1

machine,

Rcf

ISS

1206S;

);

its corrditions

of

irlstallation

and

Dimensioned
sketch of thr: test room showing
the location
of the
machine
and any significant
objects in the innncdiate
vicinity;

e) Meteorological
conditions
of test, namely,
ambient
temperature
humidity
( IJercent
)
and
barometric
pressure
( C )Y relative
LNlnWa~l;
f) Make, model and serial
numbers
of microphone,
sound
level
mctcr
arld frcqucncy
analyzrr
used stating liltcr band width and
centre frequencies;
g)

Position

h)

Band sound
point;

pressure

j)

Background
measurement

band
sound
point;

k) Band
point,
m)

of measurement

sound
pressure
after correction

Sound

level

q) The

radius

sound
sound
r8 and

area

r)

Mean
sound
Test Method

s)

The octave band mean


dance
with 4.4.1;

to machirle;
at each

level

(A) at each

measurement

(A) measurements
measurements

(A)

at

19

pressure

each

measurement

oath

measurement
measurement

hcmisphcre;

(A) as determined

sound

at

point;

at each

S of the equivalent

power
level
I ( see 3 );

measurement

measurements

level mc;isuremems
at each
for background
noise;

level
level

relative

measurements
pressure

measurements

n) Background
point;
p) Corrected
point;

paints
level

levels

in

accordance

calculated

with

in accor-

IS:12065
t)

- 1987
The calculated

mean

u) The accepts.bility
5.3

octave band

rating

det.ermined

sound power levels; and


in accordance

with 4.4.7.

Test Certificates

5.3. I Tesf Crr$cales for Tat Method


(A) weighted sound power determined

I These ~1~111include
in accordance
with 3.4.3.

the mean

5.3.2 Test ChjicntPsfor


I-cst Method II Thrse shall include the mean
(A) weighted sound power level determined
in accordance
with 3.4.3,
the
mean
(A) weighted octave band sound power levels dctelmined
in accordance with 4.4.6, and the acceptability
rating, where appropriate.
6. CLASSIFICATION
SOUND POWER
6.0 Machines
sound power.

may

OF
MACHINES
EMITTED
be divided

into

three

IN

TERMS

classes according

OF

dB

(A)

to the dB (A)

6.1 Normal Sound Power Machines in this class are of the manufacturers standard design whcrc the output has not been limited or special
acoustic trcatrncnt providccl to rc,tluce tlic nclise emitted.
I,irniting dB (A)
sound power vallles for stand,lrd
machines rated up to 16 000 kW
are
given in Appendix D.
6.2 Reduced Sound Power
- Sound power values for machines in this
class will not exccrd
the va1uc.s given in Appendix
D reduced by 5.
Machines
in this class are I)asically of the manufacturers
standard design
but may have some simple modiFlcation
or modifications,
for example,
special fans to obtain a modcrate reduction
in the noise emitted.
Such
modification
may not be practicable
for standard machines below 132 kW.
6.3 Specially
Low Sound Power Machines
in this class may have
special electrical and mechanical
design to obtain sound power level below
the classes in 6.1 or 6.2 for specific applications.
The sound power values
for machines in this class are a matter for agreement
between the manufacturer and the purchaser.

20

IS:12065 - 1987
APPENDIX
[ Claures

3.1.2 2, 3.4.1 (J&e 2) and 4.4.1 (Note 3) ]


EXAMPLES

A-l.

EXAMPLE

A-l.1 Type tests on a machine gave the following corrected


sound pressure level readings
in dB at the test positions for the 2 000 Hz centre
frequency octave band:
L,,

L,,=

87;
93;

Lr,

92;

Lp3 =

86;

L,,

= 92;

L,,

85;

~,s =

83;

~~~ = 90; L,~= a4


a = 1.8r-n
b = 1.1 m
c -

2.7 m

It is required to find the mean


the octave band sound power level.
A-l.2 Method Since
matic average may not
method of 3.4. For each
figure in col. 2 of the table

sound pressure

level at radius

rs and

the readings differ by more than 5 dR the arithbe taken. It is, therefore,
necessary
to use the
value of L, in col. 1 read off the corresponding
in Appendix E.

For

LPI corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

501

10s

Lpt corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

1 590

10s

L VJ corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

398

106

r94

corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

1 590

10s

L PB corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

316

106

L,, corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

200

10s

I 'P7 corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

2 000

10s

L pB corresponding

value in co1 2 equals

1 000

x 10s

L Pg corresponding

value in co1 2 equals


Total

21

251 x
7 816

10s
10s

IS : 12065 - 1987
A-l.3 Divide the sum by the number of reading (9) obtaining 871.8 x 10s.
Head off in co1 1 the nearest value opposite 871.8~ 106 in co1 2, that is,
89.5 dB.
89.5 dB is the mean sound pressure
centred on 2 000 Hz,

L DM=

The radius of the equivalent

hemisphere,

level

for the

rg, from 3.4.2

octave

band

is given by:

From Fig. 5 read the ordinates r = 1.85 m, that is, 13.5 dB ( to the
nearest whole number or whole number + 0.5 dB ).
adding
level.

Lw for the 2 000 H, centre frequency


octave band is obtained
by
the value just obtained to the mean octave band sound pressure

L,

A-2. EXAMPLE

= L,,

10 log,,

13.5

89.5

2x r,
~
&l
103.0 dB.

A-2.1 Tabulated

below are the octave band L,


an IP44
enclosure and rated at 132 kW, 2 970
find the (A) weighted shound power level and
the machine.
A pure tone is judged prominent
on 1 000 Hz.
Octave
Hz

63

Lw

93.5

Correction
L WA

-26

band centre
125
- 16

67.5

frequencies

250

97.5

500

98.5
-9

81.5

values for a machine with


rev/min. It is required to
the acceptability
rating for
in the octave band centred

1 000

99.0
-3

89.5

96.0

104.0

2 000

4 000

99.0

+.1

104.0

1008

8 000

95-5
+1

83.5
-1

96.5

82.5

The 1 000 Hz band contains a pure tone and its level is appreciably
greater
than the adjacent
bands. The mean (A) weighted sound power
level of the adjacent
500 Hz and 2 000 Hz bands is 98.5 dB (using
Appendix E), so the difference between this level and the 1 000 Hz band
level is 5.5 dB.
The correction
The
106.5 dB.

overall

IT is D where
(A)

weighted

D is 5.5 dB, so K =

5.5.

sound

of the machine

22

power

level

is

lS:i206.5-1987
However, taking the effect of pure tone into account,
lity rating is 106.5 + 5~5 = 112 0.
The
standard.
A-3.

machine,

EXAMPLE

therefore,

3 -

does not comply

BACKGROUND

the acceptabi-

with limits

sprcificd

in this

CORRECTION

A-3.1 The total sound level at a point is 75 dB and the background sound
level is 70 dB. It is required to determine the sound level of the source at
the measurement
point.
From

Appendix

E,

Column 2

Column 1
Total

sound level 75 dB

Background

sound level 70 dB

Difference
Reading
corresponding

31.6

106

10.0

108

21.6

10s

in col. 1, the nearest whole number or whole number +0*5


to 2 I.6 x 10s in co1 2 gives a source noise level of 73.5 dB.

Alternatively,
using Fig. 1, the dB increase in noise level caused by
the machine is 5 dB. The number of dB to be subtracted
from the total
sound level reading as the measuring point to the nearest whole number,
or whole number +0.5,
is 1.5 dB.
The

source

noise level is 75 -- l-5 =

73.5 dB.

APPENDIX
( Clause1.4 )

RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR METHODS
OF ASSESSING
OF MACHINES
ON LOAD

NOISE

B-l. The standard conditions for noise tests are that the machine should be
on no-load and the sound be radiated
in a free-field
over a reflecting
plane.
B-2. If it is apparent that there is a significant difference
in the noise level
of the machine
between no load and rated load ( or any other load ) the
magnitude
of the difference may, by agreement between the manufacturer
and the purchaser,
be determined
approximately
from near field sound
pressure level measurements.

23

1s t 12065 - 1987
B-3; This method consists of carrying
out sound pressure level measurements at a number
of points suitably distributed
around the machine,
sufficiently
close to it so that the measurements
are not significantly
affected by nearby
reflecting surfaces or background
noise. The use of
directional
microphones
for this test nlay be desirable.
B-4. The provisions
of Test Methods
I or II as appropriate
apply in
general with the exception of the section dealing with location of measurement points.
B-5. For near field measurements,
an agreed prescribed surface.

the measurement

points

are located

on

B-6. Reading should be taken with the machine


on no load and on the
load for which the increase in noise level si required.
The difference
betwecn these two readings is then added to the no load sound power value
obtained by Test Method I or II as appropriate
to give an approximation
to the sound power value on load.

APPENDIX
C
( Clauses 1.5, 4.0.1 and 4.3.4 )
TEST

METHOD

FOR

SEMI-REVERBERANT

CONDITIONS

C-O. This appendix describes the measurements


to be rnade whrn the test
room does not qualify as giving free field over a reflecting
plane and is
not a reverberant
or diffuse field.
When the noise radiated from
measurement
of the machine
noise
should be regarded as an approximate
ment.
C-l.

TEST

a machine
has marked
directivity,
under semi-reverberant
conditions
method for machine noise measure-

CONDITIONS

C-l.1 Test Environment


Where the difference
between the mean
sound pressure levels at full and half distance is less than 5 dB but greater
than 2 dB, semi-reverberant
conditions may be assumed to exist.
C-l.2

Background

Noise

C-l.3

Operating

Conditions

of Machine

C-1.4

Mounting

of Machine

As in 3.1.2

for each octave

Stz 3.1.4.
24

on Test

band.
see 3.1.3.

IS : 12065 - 1987
C-2.

MEASURING

C-2.1

Grade

C-2.2

Checking

C-3.

INSTRUMENTS

-- Spc 4.2.1.
of Measuring

Equipment

See 3.2.3.

TEST MEASUREMENTS

C-3.0 The method described


in this clause is applicable
to the measurement of sound radiation
in a semi-reverberant
environment
over a
reflecting plane.
c-3.1

Test

of Room

C-3.2

Method

c-3.3

Location

Suitability

of Measurement

See 3.3.1.

of Measurement

See 3.3.2.
Points

Quantities
to be Determined
c-3.4
be determined
at each of the measurement
a) Sound
b)

level in dB (A);

See 3.3.3.

The following quantities should


points determined from C-3.2:

and

Band sound pressure levels in the


to 8 000 Hz with the sound level
(C)
weighting.
Where
linear
weighting is sufficiently
close to
frequency range.

octave bands centred on 63 Hz


meter set to linear response or
response
is not available,
(C)
linear response over the above

The measurement
at each point should be corrected for the effects of
any background
noise (see 3.1.2).
Any corrections indicated by the calibration checks, shall also be taken into account.

ment .
C-4.

No

other

corrections

EVALUATION

tj;4i14CIalculation

shall be applied

OF TEST
of Octave

for the

effects of test

environ-

MEASUREMENT

Band Mean

Sound

Pressure

Levels

. . .
C-4.2

Calculation

C-4.3 Calculation
See 3.4.2.

of Mean
of

Sound Level (A) -

the Radius

See 3.4.1.

of the Equivalent

Hemisphere

C-4.4 Evaluation
of the Mean
Sound Power levels in Octave
The octave band sound power levels can be deduced from the
Bands octave band mean sound pressure
levels by taking into account the influence of the test room on the measured sound pressure levels.
25

IS t 12065 - 1987

This effect can be determined


by using a small non-directional
broad..
band reference
sound source ( some types of aerodynamic
noise source
may not be suitable ) of known sound power.
The determination
of the octave band sound power level of the
reference source (I,,,) should be determined
in a free field above a reflecting plane as detailed in 4.4.4.
The reference sound source should then be substituted for the machine
on test in the semi-reverberant
room and the octave band mean sound
pressure levels obtained
from measurements
at the same measurement
points as for the machine on test.
The octave band
following equation:

sound
JLV =

power

level may

be determined

from the

LWr + LrM - L pikfr

where
L,

octave band sound power


machine on test (dB);

level

re.

level re.

10-l* watts
lo-12

of the

I 2wr =

octave band sound power


reference source (dB);

watts

of the

L PM =

octave band mean sound pressure


level re. 2 x
N/m2 (Pa) of the machine on test (dB); and

L PMr= octave band mean sound pressure level re. 2~


N/m* (Pa) of the reference source (dB)

10-s
10-s

Evaluation
of the Mean
-See 4.4.5.

(A) Weighted

Octave

Band

Sound

Evaluation
of the Mean
Levels - See 4.4.6.

(A) Weighted

Octave

Band

Sound

Power
C-4.7

Evaluation

C-4.5
Levels

C-4.6

of the Acceptability

26

Rating

See 4.4.7.

IS : 12065 - 1987

APPENDIX

( Chuses 1.3, 3.0.1, 4.4.7.3, 6.1 and6.2 )


LIMITING

Protective

MEAN

SOUND POWER LEVEL Lw IN dB ( A ) FOR AIRBORNE


BY ROTATING
ELECTRICAL
MACHINES

IP
22

Enclosure

____
Rating

kV

Above

up to

;::

11
2.2
5.5

:2

::

:2p

j
Rated

960 and below

22 corresponds
IP 14 corresponds

provided

82
79

generally
generally

No positive tolerance

of protection

961 to 1 320

1321

:2p

ii

79
84
80

to 1900

=
-

by enclosures

87
:3

I
I

on the above sound power levels.

for rotating

electrical

machinery

27

:2

::

2 361 to 3 150

:;

( jirst rcuision j.

:4p

______

1 901 to 2 360

to drip-proof, ventilated and similar enclosures.


to totally enclosed fan-cooled, closed air circuit air-cooled,

is allowed

Speed ( rev/min )

Sound Power Level dB( A

I -- IP

NOTE 2 -

*Methods

( or k\A)
i

NOTE

ifi

NOISE EMITTED

3 151 to 3 750

)
88:

and similar

84
Fj;

enclosures

( see IS

: 4691-l985*

).

As in the Original Standard, this Page is Intentionally Left Blank

1s :I2065- 1987
APPENDIX

[ Clauses 3 12.2, 3 4.1 (3Vote2), 4.4.1 (flute 3), 4.4.7.2 (~Vote),


A-1.2, A-2.1 and A-3.1 ]
CONVERSION

dB

(1)

(2)

(1)

x 106

TABLE
(2)

dB

(1)

108

(2)

dU

100

--1095
109
1085
108
107.5

89
79
70
63
56

loo
400
800
100
200

895
ii.5

891
708
794

695
lii.5

88
875

631
562

68
67-5

891
794
708
631
562

107
1065
106
1055
105

50
44
39
35
31

100
700
800
500
600

882.5
86
85.5
85

447
501
398
355
316

665
67
66
655
65

501
417
398
355
3.16

1045
104
1035
103
102-5

28
25
22
20
17

200
100
400
000
800

845
84
835
83
82.5

282
251
224
200
178

645
64
635
63
62.5

282
251
224
200
178

102
101.5
101
1005
100

15
14
12
11
10

900
100
600
200
000

82
81.5
81,
805
80

159
141
126
112
100

62
615
61
GO5
60

159
141
126
1.12
100

595
59
585

$5

89 1
794
708
631
562

0891
0.794
0708
063 1
0562

77
76.5
76
755
75

50 1
447
39.8
355
316

57
565
z.5
55

0501
0447
0398
0355
0.316

74.5
74
73.5
73
725

282
25 1
224
200
178

54.5
54
535
53
525

0.282
O-251
0224
0200
0178

72
715
71
705
70

159
14.1
126
112
10.0

52
515
51
505
50

0159
0141
0*126
0112
0100

99.5
99
985
;;*5

87 ::e
7 080
56 620
310

97
965
E-5

5 010
4 460
3 550
980

95

3 160

945

2 820

z.5
93
925

22 510
240
2000
1 780

91
905
90

1 590
1 410
1 260
1 120

1 000

795
79
785

29

55u7.5

IS : 12065- 1989
( Conlinucd from page 2 )
Represenhg

Members

Bharat Bijlee Ltd, Bombay


SERI S. G. DESHMUKII
Snnx A. B. BI~ALEI~A~ ( Allcrnole )
Crompton Greaves Ltd, Bombay
SHRI
C. P. DUSAD
SHRI
A. V. WAQLE ( Allernale )
Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, Bangalore
SHRI
M. GANESH
SARI M. R. PUIZANDARE ( Alfernnfe )
Steel Authority of India Ltd, New Delhi
SHRI
A. K. GHOSIX
SURI N. SUBHAMANIAN ( Altwuate )
Small
Scale
Industries
Coimbatore
District
SHRI J. GOWRISANKAH
Association, Coimbatore
STANDAHUS Research,
Design Cyr Standards
Organization,
D~IZE~TOR
JOINT
Lucknow
( ELECT )-3
DESIGN EN~INBER ( ELECT ) B-2 ( Alternate )
Indian Jute Mills Association, Calcutta
SHRI M. L. KOT~AEI
Walchandnagar
Industries Ltd, Walchandnagar
SHHI
A. P. LAD
SHRI
S. S. K~JLEARNI ( Alternate)
Voltas Ltd, Bombay
SHRI,J. R. MAHAJAN
Indian Machine Tool Manufacturers
Association,
SHRI
K. S. MINHAS
Bombay
National Test House, Calcutta
SBEI B. MCJKHOPADHYAY
SHR~ D. N. UPADIIYAYA ( Alternafe )
Millowners
Association, Bombay
SHRI J. M. NAIX
Directorate
of Industries & Commerce,
GovernSHRI C. NATRAJAN
ment of Tamil Nadu, Madras
SKRI
V. RANQACIIAIZI ( Altrrnntc )
Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd, Vadodara
Dn M. S. PAI)BI~I~I
Snn~ M. RAMAI(ILISIINA RAO ( Allernate )
All India Electric Motor Manufacturers
AssociaSHRI
V. K. D. PAI
tion. Bombav
SARI S. K. CHOUDHEY ( Alternate )
Indian
Electrical
Manufacturers
Association,
DR G. M. PHADKE
Bombay
SHRI S. P. MORE ( Alternate )
Jyoti Limited, Vadodara
SHRI P. L. PRA~HAN
SHRI A. B. C~OUDHARI ( Alternate )
HMT Limited, Bangalore
SHRI M. RAN~ASHAI
KUMARI NIRMALA NAXK ( AItcrnote )
NGEF Ltd, Bangalore
SHRI
S. L. SRIDHARAMURTHY
SHRI H. A. P. IYEn ( Alfarnots )

( Continued on page 3 I )

30

IS:
( Cdnued

12065 - 1987

f70m page 30 )

Panel

for Measurement
and Evaluation
of Vibration
Electrical
Machines,
ETIX
15: I:5
Representing

COllUtX8T

SHIU C. MALLANNA

of Rotating

Central

Machine

Tool Institute, Bangalore

Members
SHRI B. R. SATYAM ( Alternate to
Sa~r C. MALLANNA )
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd, Hvderabad
Snnr ANIRIJDH SINQII
SHI~I A. S. SIDRU ( Alternate )
Crompton Greaves Ltd, Bombay
SHRI R. S. BAIZVE
Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd, Bombay
Snm D. K. CHAKRABORTY
SBRI G. K. MAJUMDAR ( Alternate )
Bharat Bijlee Ltd, Bombay
SHI~I S. G. DES~MUKH
SHRI A. V. BHALEXAO ( Alternate )
Jyoti Limited, Vadodara
DR. A. R. KRISEINAMVRTHY
Heavy Engineering Corporation,
Ranchi
SHRI
B. KUMAR
S~nr C. H. VARXA ( Allernatc )
National Test House, Calcutta
SARI B. MUKHOPAI)HYAY
Tuticorin
Alkali
Chemical
& Pertilisers
SH~I M. S. NAIR
Ttlticorin
Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd, Bangalore
SARI G. NARAYAN
SHIU M. GURUBASAVAI~AJ ( Alternate )
HMT Limited, Hangalore
SHKI N. KESHAV
RAO VALASE
Tata Engineering
and Locomotive
Co
SHRI G. VISEWANATIXAN
.Jamshedpur
NGEF Limited, Bangalore
SHRI S. A. WAJID
SHRI R. M. MEQHANATEAN ( Alternate )

31

Ltd,

Ltd,

BUREAU

OF INDIAN STANDARDS

Headquarters
Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Mara. NEW DELHI
Telephones:
323 0131,323
3375,323
9402
Fax : 91 11 3234062.91
11 3239399,
91 11 3239382

Telegrams : Manaksanstha
(Common to all Offices)
Telephone

Central Laboratory
Plot No. 20/9,

110002

Site IV, Sahibabad

Industrial Area,

Sahibabad

201010

Marg, NEW

DELHI

8-77

00 32

Regional Offices:

: Manak

Central

Bhavan,

9 Bahadur

*Eastern

: l/l

Northern

: SC0

Southern

: C.I.T. Campus, IV Cross


: Manakalaya, E9, Behind

IWestern
MUMBAI

4 CIT Scheme
335-336,

Shah Zafar

VII M, V.I.P. Road, Maniktola,

Sector 34-A,

CHANDIGARH

110002

CALCUlTA

700054

160022

323 76 17
337 86 62
60 38 43

Road, CHENNAI

600113

235 23 15

Marol Telephone

Exchange,

Andheri (East),

832 92 95

380001

5501348

400093

Branch Offices::
Pushpak,

Nurmohamed

Shaikh

$Peenya Industrial Area,


BANGALORE
560058
Gangotri

Complex,

Plot No. 62-63,


Kalaikathir

E-52,

Chitaranjan

Road,

Second

Industrial

Station

Marg, C-Scheme,
Nagar,

Seth Bhawan,
2nd Floor,
LUCKNOW
226001

Patliputra

Behind

PATNA

BHOPAL

462003

751001
641037

21 01 41

121001

GUWAHATI

Road,

781003

HYDERABAD

500001

37 29 25

Naval

NAGPUR

Kishore

Road,

440010

23 89 23

52 51 71
26 23 05

Shivaji Nagar,

PUNE

411005

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Approach,

Office is at Novelty Chambers,

19 96

20 10 83

800013

T.C. No. 14/l 421, University P. 0. Palayam,

88 01

8-71

21 68 76

Cinema,

Market,

8-28

54 11 37

302001

Leela

55 40 21
40 36 27

208005

(India) Building 1332

*Sales Office is at 5 Chowringhee


CALCU-ITA
700072

839 49 55

201001

JAIPUR

KANPUR

Floor, Gokulpat

Estate,

institution of Engineers

tSales

FARIDABAD

R.G. Barua Road, 5th By-lane,

B, Sarvodaya

Building,

Road, T.T. Nagar,

BHUBANESHWAR

116 G.T. Road, GHAZIABAD

No.29,

Road,

Road, COIMBATORE

L.N. Gupta Marg, Nampally

117/418

NIT

Nagar,

16 A, Mathura

AHMEDABAD

Bangalore-Tumkur

5th Floor, Bhadbhada

Buildings, 670 Avinashi

Plot No. 43, Sector

5-8-56C,

1 st Stage,

Unit VI, Ganga

Savitri Complex,
53/5 Ward

Marg, Khanpur,

P.O. Princep

Grant Road,

Street,

MUMBAI

*Sales Office is at F Block, Unity Building, Narashimaraja


BANGALORE
560002

400007

Square,

695034

32 36 35
621

17

271085

309 65 28
222 39 71

Pr-inted ul Dre Kay Printers, Nvw Delhi. lrldia

AMENDMENT

NO. 1 MAY 1999


.TO
IS 12065 : 1987 PERMISSIBLE LIMITS OF NOISE
LEVELS FOR ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINES
(Page27, heading, cof 1) -Substitute

(ETD

kW(or kVA)for

kV(or kVA).

15)
Reprognphy Unit, BIS, New Delhi, India

Вам также может понравиться