Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Georesources Laboratory, Water Research and Technology Centre, Borj Cedria Ecopark, PO Box 273 Soliman 8020, Tunisia
Water Sciences and Technique Laboratory, National Agronomic Institute of Tunisia, 43 Avenue Charles Nicolle, Mahraje ne, 1082 Tunis, Tunisia
c
IRD, UMR G-EAU, BP 5095, 34196 Montpellier cedex 5, France
b
a r t i c l e i n f o
abstract
Article history:
Received 15 February 2012
Received in revised form
9 April 2012
Accepted 9 May 2012
Available online 24 May 2012
Keywords:
Hydrogeology
Groundwater modeling
Geographic information system
MODFLOW
1. Introduction
In arid and semi-arid regions, the intense groundwater
resources exploitation has often led to decrease in the groundwater levels, deterioration of the water quality, and saltwater
intrusion (Foster and Loucks, 2006; Lachaal et al., 2010). In order
to dene a sustainable exploitation of groundwater resources
taking into account the future impact of the global change on
water resources, a proper understanding of the behavior of the
groundwater system and assessment of the groundwater
resources is an important prerequisite (e.g., Carrera-Hernandez
and Gaskin, 2006; Chenini and Ben Mammou, 2010).
Groundwater numerical modeling ow has become an invaluable tool for proper management of the groundwater systems
(Sedki and Ouazar, 2011; Manghi et al., 2011; Dong et al., 2012;
Xu et al., 2012), especially for assessing the impact of existing and
future activities on groundwater resources (Huang et al., 2008).
n
Corresponding author at: Georesources Laboratory, Water Research and
Technology Centre, Borj Cedria Ecopark, PO Box 273 Soliman 8020, Tunisia.
Tel.: 216 97 325 122; fax: 216 79 325 802.
E-mail address: lachaalfethi@yahoo.fr (F. Lachaal).
0098-3004/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.007
188
Fig. 1. Location map of the study area (a) and structural map (b) of the JemmelZeramdine Sector.
Fig. 2. AA0 Hydrogeological cross section showing the inuence of Zeramdine fault corridor in the differentiation of the ZeramdineBeni Hassen and the JemmelBembla
Miocene deep aquifer.
189
3. Database
The investigation and groundwater modeling include some stages
that are shown in Fig. 3. rst, the development of a spatial database,
whatever the domain of application, permits to gather all the required
data in one structure making easier the access and offering the
possibility to update it when needed (Bonomi, 2009; Chesnaux et al.,
2011). The characterization and conceptualization of the ZBH Miocene aquifer was done using the SIG tools. In fact, a hydrogeological
spatial database was developed to the aquifer in order to simplify the
use, the interpretation of the available hydrogeological data, and to
Governing equations
Data collection
Generated layers for
groundwater system
Database
Model discretisation
Conceptualmodel
Boundary conditions
Construction of
mathematicalmodel
Initial conditions
Construction of numericalmodel
hydraulic
conductivity
Groundwater
discharge
Groundwater
recharge
Run
Non accepted
uncertainties
Calculated head
Calibration (comparison of
calculated and observed head
accepted
uncertainties
recharge +
extraction
Initial
head
specific storage
and porosit
Run
Calculatedhead
Non accepted
uncertainties
Calibration (comparison of
calculated and observed head
Model validation
Database
Construction
Data
Collection
190
Topography
Digitizing
contours
TIN
map
DEM
Outcrop area
(lithology)
Rainfall
Petroleum
wells
Boreholes
Digitizing
contours
Attribute
data
editing
Attribute
data
editing
Attribute
data
editing
Lithology
map
Rainfall
map
Depth reservoir
characterization
Recharge
map
Reservoir
depth
Seismic
speed
Seismic-reflexion
profiles
Attribute
data
editing
Structure
Attribute
data
editing
Piezometer
Attribute
data
editing
Goundwater
wells simples
Attribute
data
editing
Two-way traveltime
Aquifer
Seismic
structure map structural maps (TWT) speed map
of the reservoir layers
Piezometric
head
Hydrochimical
map
Spatial Data
Analysis
Groundwater
geometric map
(depth )
Data classification
Data
Modeling
Data modeling
two-way travel time structural maps and elevation maps were drawn
for the different layers using GeoFrame Charisma software (v3.8,
Schlumberger) and ARC VIEW Software (ESRI). The seismic horizons
were calibrated using the time-depth conversion curve of the
petroleum wells and the outcrops in the region. The obtained spatial
data were introduced in the spatial database. The piezometric data
provided by the DGRE consists of monthly water level measurements
in 17 wells between 1995 and 2008. In addition, we used also
piezometric data from previous campaigns done by Hubert (1968)
and Amri (1989).
3.2. Outputs from the hydrogeological database
Several kind of information could be derived from the database
from which we can indicate top and base elevation maps of the
different reservoir layers of the ZBH aquifer, structural and
piezometric head maps, and hydrogeological 3-D model.
All required GIS data for conceptual modeling is converted to the
appropriate formats for numerical modeling using the ARC GIS
3.2 software package (ESRI). The subsurface catchment, the geometric
boundary of the modeled aquifer, the aquifer base and top of the
different aquifer layers, the recharge zone (Miocene outcrop and
hydraulic structures), the observation, and pumping wells positions
are saved as shape les which is compatible with the used modeling
software.
4. Hydrogeological setting and aquifer structure
The groundwater resources in the Zeramdine and Beni Hassen
regions are made of two hydrogeological systems. The shallow
191
Fig. 5. Piezometric head evolution of the ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer: (a) 1968 (modied from Hubert (1968)), (b) 1989 (modied from Amri (1989))
and (d) September 2007.
192
Ky
Kz
qs
dt
@x
@x
@y
@y
@z
@z
Fig. 6. Conceptual 3-D model of the ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer (Lachaal et al., in press-b).
193
Fig. 7. Domain model discretisation and boundary conditions of ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer.
TWT map
V map
2
where Elevation map is the top and base elevation maps of the
aquifer layers. TWT map is the Two-way travel time maps of the
different reectors of the top and base of the aquifer layers. The V
map represents the overage seismic speed of each reector. It was
deduced from the interpolation of overage seismic speed calculated in the petroleum wells by ETAP.
7.4.2. Hydrogeological parameters
Estimation of the hydraulic conductivity and specic storage of
the ZBH Miocene aquifer system have been obtained from the
analysis of two series of pumping tests data done in the study
area. The rst consists of nine points carried out by Hubert (1968)
and the second including 16 tests that were carried out by the
DGRE. The results and the interpretations of the available 25
pumping tests are shown in Table 1. The calculated hydraulic
parameters range between 4 10 6 and 2 10 3 m s 1. The
strange variability that characterizes the hydraulic parameters is
explained by the uvio-deltaic nature of the Miocene sediments
and their rapid facies variations.
7.4.3. Groundwater extraction
The groundwater extraction is studied during the 19732007
period. It increased from 0.97 M m3 yr 1 in 1985 to 4 M m3 yr 1
in 2002. The well number has increased from 4 in 1973 to 26 in
2007. The groundwater extraction evolution can be divided into
three periods (Fig. 8):
Table 1
Hydrodynamic characteristics of ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer
(deduced from drilling well reports, DGRE).
Well
N1
Well
name
Crepine
length
(m)
Transmissivity
(10 3 m2 s 1)
Hydraulic
conductivity
(10 4 m s 1)
Specic
storage
(l s 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19826/4
17821/4
18999/4
19224/4
19284/4
19204/4
18308/4
18089/4
18321/4
20279/4
19831/4
19477/4
17707/4
18637/4
19527/4
19379/4
18090/4
Ezdine
Abd Jelil
9913/4
10626/4
10626bis/
4
10654/4
8210bis/4
7381/4
8204bis/4
29
48
55.8
29.5
40
62
50.2
36
45
75
83
24
30
35.6
57.2
30
23.7
33.5
1.90
7.40
14.60
6.30
4.00
31.10
5.00
10.70
10.80
2.40
11.90
50.00
10.66
13.60
8.73
2.60
1.18
0.24
0.66
1.54
2.62
2.14
1.00
5.02
1.00
2.97
2.40
0.32
1.43
20.83
3.55
3.82
1.53
0.87
0.50
0.07
0.52
0.17
0.36
0.85
1.80
0.27
0.20
0.28
0.22
0.16
0.18
0.63
0.50
0.28
0.35
0.34
0.09
22.2
29.6
32.6
0.15
0.13
0.12
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.45
0.27
0.23
6.4
7.4
17.1
0.68
0.90
3.00
0.50
0.20
0.10
0.80
0.50
0.10
1.10
3.90
1.15
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
194
Fig. 8. Extraction evolution of the ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer (19732008).
measure for the reliability of the operational model. The calibration of the current groundwater model involved two sequential
steps.
3
1
195
Fig. 11. Examples of observed and calculated head by the model hydrographs at
ve specic observation wells.
Fig. 10. Calibrated hydraulic conductivity values from the groundwater ow model.
196
Fig. 13. Water balance evolution of ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer (19802007).
197
Legend
Drawdown level (m)
Fig. 14. Drawdown map of ZeramdineBeni Hassen Miocene deep aquifer during the 19802007 period.
9. Conclusion
An integrated methodology of groundwater ow model was
developed to validate the groundwater data deduced from the
geological, geophysical, hydrodynamic studies and to complete
the groundwater dynamics characterization of the ZBH Miocene
aquifer. In fact, to investigate hydrological processes in ZBH
Miocene aquifer, a large amount of available geological and
hydrological data was integrated to construct a 3-D groundwater
ow model, using the coupling of MODFLOW with ARC VIEW
Geographic Information System. The combination and the compilation of all available data spatially the geophysical data
(seismic-reection and wireline logging of drilling wells), Hydrodynamic characterization (piezometric comportment and evolution and groundwater ow) were necessary in order to
characterize the studied aquifer. The model was calibrated and
validated with datasets of 19802007 period. Results of the
groundwater dynamics simulation of the study aquifer show that
calculated water levels are close to the observed values. The
model leads us the groundwater characterization. The hydraulic
conductivity and the aquifer water balance are deduced from the
steady state. The porosity, specic storage, and groundwater
reserve evolution are deduced from the transient simulations.
The used methodology allowed us to complete and nalize the
groundwater hydrogeological comprehension.
Most of steps and hypothesis for model construction in this
work may also be used and transferred for other regions with
comparable geological and hydrological conditions, as a management tool to understand the groundwater hydrogeology process
and to understand the behavior of aquifer systems under different
hydrological stresses, whether induced naturally or by human
activities.
References
Amri, R., 1989. Hydrogeologie du do me Vindobonien dans la Region de ZeramedineBeni Hassen. Report, Ministry of Agriculture (Direction Generale des
Ressources en Eau), Tunis, Tunisia [in French].
Bear, J., 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover Publications, New York.
Bedir, M., Zargouni, F., Tlig, S., Bobier, C., 1992. Subsurface geodynamics and
petroleum geology of transform margin basins in the Sahel of Mahdia and El
Jem (eastern Tunisia). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin
76 (9), 14171442.
Bedir, M., Tlig, S., Bobier, C., Zargouni, F., Assaoui, N., 1996. Sequence stratigraphy,
basin dynamics and petroleum geology of Miocene from the eastern Tunisia.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 80 (1), 6381.
Beni-Akhy, R., 1998. Etude des Impacts Anthropiques sur les Eaux Souterraines du
Sahel Oriental Tunisien: Caracterisation Hydrogeologique, Modelisation Mathematique et Cartographie de la Vulnerabilite Environnementale. Ph.D. University of Tunis II, 377 pp [in French].
Bonomi, T., 2009. Database development and 3D modeling of textural variations in
heterogeneous, unconsolidated aquifer media: application to the Milan plain.
Computers & Geosciences 35, 134145.
Bouri, S., Ben Dhia, H., 2010. A 30-year articial recharge experiment in a coastal
aquifer in an arid zone: the Teboulba aquifer system (Tunisian Sahel). Comptes
Rendus Geosciences 342 (1), 6074.
Burollet, PF., 1956. Contribution a letude stratigraphie de la Tunisie centrale. Ann.
Mines. Geol Tunis 18, 350. [in French].
Carrera-Hernandez, J.J., Gaskin, S.J., 2006. The groundwater modeling tool for
GRASS (GMTG): Open source groundwater ow modeling. Computers &
Geosciences 32, 339351.
Chenini, I., Ben Mammou, A., 2010. Groundwater recharge study in arid region: an
approach using GIS techniques and numerical modeling. Computers & Geosciences 36 (6), 801817.
Chesnaux, R., Lambert, M., Walter, J., Fillastre, U., Hay, M., Rouleau, A., Daigneault,
R., Moisan, A., Germaneau, D., 2011. Building a geodatabase for mapping
hydrogeological features and 3D modeling of groundwater systems:
application to the Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean region, Canada. Computers &
Geosciences 37, 18701882, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.013.
Dong, Y., Li, G., XU, H., 2012. An areal recharge and discharge simulating method
for MODFLOW. Computers & Geosciences 42, 203205.
ESRI. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 19921999.
Foster, S., Loucks, D.P., 2006. Non-Renewable Groundwater Resources. Series on
Groundwater No. 10. International Hydrological Programme (IHP). UNESCO
Division of Water Sciences, France.
Gaaloul, N., 1995. Les Environnements Siliciclastiques du Neoge ne du Sahel de la
Tunisie: Palynologie et Biosedimentologie. Ph.D. University of Tunis II, Tunisia,
256 pp [in French].
Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., McDonald, M.G., 2000. MODFLOW-2000.
The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model User Guide to
Modularization Concepts and the Groundwater Flow. Process. U.S. Geological
Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report, 0092, pp 121.
Huang, J.Q., Christ, J.A., Goltz, M.N., 2008. An assembly model for simulation
of large-scale ground water ow and transport. Ground Water 46,
882892.
Hubert, C., 1968. Etude Hydrogeologique du Vindobonien dans la Region de
ZeramdineBeni Hassen. Report, Direction Generale des Ressources en Eau,
Tunis, 53 pp [in French].
Lachaal, F., Bedir, M., Tarhouni, J., Leduc, C., 2010. Hydrodynamic and hydrochemical changes affecting groundwater in a semi-arid region: the deep
198
Manghi, F., Williams, D., Safely, J., Hamdi, M.R., 2011. Groundwater ow modeling
of the Arlington basin to evaluate management strategies for expansion of the
Arlington Desalter water production. Water Resources Management 26,
2141, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9899-6.
Manna-Tayech, B., 2009. The lithostratigraphy of Miocene series from Tunisia
revisited. Journal of African Earth Sciences 54, 5361.
McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W., 1988. A Modular Three-Dimensional FiniteDifference Ground-Water Flow Model: US Geological Survey Techniques of
Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Washington, USA (Chapter A1).
Sedki, A., Ouazar, D., 2011. Swarm intelligence for groundwater management
optimization. Journal of Hydroinformatics 13, 520532, http://dx.doi.org/
10.2166/hydro.2010.163.
Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc , 2003. Visual Modow V.3.1. Users Manual For
Professional Applications in Three-Dimensional Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport Modeling, 452 pp.
Xu, X., Huang, G., Zhan, H., Qu, Z., Huang, Q., 2012. Integration of SWAP and
MODFLOW-2000 for modeling groundwater dynamics in shallow water table
areas. Journal of Hydrology 412-413, 170181.