Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Course Description
This course introduces a critical approach to the three symbiotic areas of the program at the graduate level: media
and culture; politics and policy, and technology in practice: applied perspectives. The course explores each area in
modules that concentrate on four aspects: history; philosophy; theory; and principle concepts or issues, with one
week dedicated to each aspect in each area.
The course readings represent a range of the foundational theoretical and methodological approaches to the study
of communications and culture. They are intended to introduce students to the key debates in the field and
demonstrate the interdisciplinary evolution of the field.
Required Texts
Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas M. Kellner (eds.), Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks, (Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing, 2005).
The readings in the syllabus are available online. Weekly readings must be completed prior to class and in order to
contribute to class discussions. Supplementary readings or materials may be assigned by the instructor. Readings
are subject to change with notice.
Assessment schema
Class participation (10%) In seminar classes, everyone learns to the degree that each student contributes by
reading and engaging in discussion. Participation grades reflect a students engagement with fellow students and
course material. Students are expected to have read all assigned readings and be prepared to participate in class.
Contributions to classroom discussions, in the form of questions (esp. for your fellow student-presenters), relevant
comments, and healthy debate, are encouraged and expected. Attendance alone does not constitute class
participation.
Class moderation (15% + 15% = 30%) A 20-30 minute structured presentation based on assigned readings. Youll be
expected to begin your presentation with a thesis statement that articulates the key points youll be making about
the readings and then elaborate a coherent, sustained, instructive argument (in other words, dont merely summarize
the articles you are presenting). You may use/refer to images, films, other texts, etc. in your discussion. If these
materials form a substantive part of your presentation, you must make them available to class members at least one
full week before your presentation. Be prepared to lead the class discussion following your presentation. The quality of
the discussion that arises from the presentation will be factored into your grade.
Email me your presentation notes no later than noon the day of class (N.B. your presentation will not be graded if I
dont receive your presentation notes). The presentation notes can be typed or handwritten but they need to be
legible and complete (i.e. references to outside materials, including images). Bring and hand out (or email) a copy of
your presentation notes to your fellow class members.
Essay proposal (10%) An essay proposal (maximum 300 words) that describes concisely your essays topic,
argument, objective, and significance, and includes a bibliography of 10 scholarly sources, is due Thursday 6
October, no later than 2:30 pm. I encourage you to speak with me about your papers during my office hours.
Essay (20%) Your essay should be a critical engagement with a topic introduced in the readings during the first 6
weeks of the course. It may not be on the same topic/readings as your presentation. It can focus on locating the topic in
the context of relevant academic debates (including contemporary interpretations), or applying the concepts and
theoretical perspectives introduced in the topic week to an issue of special interest to you. You should consult 7-10
scholarly sources, in addition to the topic weeks course readings, to inform and support your papers argument.
Your essay will be evaluated for the quality of the ideas, the intellectual framing of the argument, and the clarity of
its written expression. The relevance and quality of the sources you choose will also be taken into account.
12-15 double-spaced pages maximum (3000-3750 words). Use a 12-point font and footnotes, Chicago-style citation
preferred. See Academic Conduct below. Due Wednesday 26 October, no later than 4:30 pm.
Exam (30%) The in-class exam is an open-notebook style exam comprised of two long-essay questions. Your
answers should demonstrate your understanding of the material introduced in course readings and class
discussions and your ability to synthesize key concepts and theories. Examination length: 2.5 hours.
Examination date: 1 December, 2:30 p.m.
Academic Conduct
Plagiarism is a serious academic offence and penalties range from zero on an assignment to expulsion. In any academic
exercise, plagiarism occurs when you offer as your own work the words, data, ideas, arguments, calculations,
designs or productions of another without appropriate attribution or when you allow your work to be copied.
Submitting the same work for credit in more than one course is not acceptable. If you have questions about
academic integrity, come and talk to me and/or consult http://www.yorku.ca/acadinte/students/index.htm.
Last date to drop course without receiving a grade is 11 November
01| 08-sep
02| 15-sep
Simran
Rob
Roland Barthes, The Rhetoric of the Image, Image/Music/Text, (NY: Hill & Wang, 1964).
https://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Barthes-Rhetoric-of-the-image-ex.pdf
Emily
Tanya
Related Readings
Stuart Hall, "Gramsci's relevance for the study of race and ethnicity," Journal of
Communication Inquiry 10(2), June 1986: 5-27
03| 22-sep
Madison
Danielle
Dick Hebdige, Object as Image: The Italian Scooter Cycle, Hiding In The Light: On Images
And Things. (London: Psychology Press, 1988)
http://citizendev.webs.com/pdfs%20and%20readings/Hebdige_Object_as_Image.pdf
Related Readings
Stuart Hall, Encoding/Decoding, M&CS: KeyWorks.
Stuart Hall, Cultural Identity and Diaspora, in J. Rutherford (ed.), Identity: Community,
Culture, Difference (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1990): 222-237 .
04| 29-sep
Erika
Cody
Niki
Olivia
Related readings
Bonita Lawrence, Gender, Race, and the Regulation of Native Identity in Canada
and the United States: An Overview. Hypatia 18, 2 (2003): 3-31
05| 06-oct
** Essay
proposal
due today
Megan
Ana
Dana
Related readings
Michael Warner, Publics and Counterpublics. (New York: Zone Books, 2005)
Carl DiSalvo, Design and the Construction Of Publics, Design Issues: 25, 1 Winter
2009. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48
06| 13-oct
** Ioan Davies
Memorial
Lecture
speaker: Sarah
Brouillette
Maurizio Lazzarato, Immaterial Labor, in Virno Paolo and Hardt Michael (eds.)
Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, (University of Minnesota Press, 1996).
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttssjm
Erika
Tiziana Terranova, Free Labor: Producing Culture For the Digital Economy, Social
Text, 18(2), 2000. http://web.mit.edu/schock/www/docs/18.2terranova.pdf
Shaughna
Jessia
Ahsan
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=01622870%28199224%2959%3C3%3APOTSOC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T
07| 20-oct
Dana
Susan Ashley, "State Authority and the Public Sphere: Ideas on the changing role of
the Museum as a Canadian social institution." Museum & Society 3:1 (2005): 517.https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/museumstudies/museumsociety/documen
ts/volumes/ashley.pdf
Niki
David Dean and Peter E Rider, Museums, Nation, and Political History in the
Australian National Museum and the Canadian Museum of Civilization, Museum
and Society 3, no. 1 (2005): 35-50
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Dean10/publication/242401363_Mus
eums_Nation_and_Political_History_in_the_Australian_National_Museum_and_t
he_Canadian_Museum_of_Civilization/links/542acf4f0cf277d58e8a01e2.pdf
Jane Griffith, One Little, Two Little, Three Canadians: The Indians of Canada
Pavilion and Public Pedagogy, Expo 1967, Journal of Canadian Studies, 49, No. 2,
(Spring 2015): 171-204. https://muse-jhuedu.ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/article/614385/pdf
**| 26-oct
08| 27-oct
Olivia
Ana
09| 03-nov
** Both sections
meet @ York
Carolyn Marvin, Dazzling the Multitudes in When Old Technologies Were New
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1988) [e-book available via York Library]
Shaugha
Megan
Lynn Spigel, Installing the Television Set [...]19481955, Camera Obscura, 6, no.1
(1988): 9-46
Danilele
10| 10-nov
Cody
Madison
Jessia
Rob
Related readings:
Madeleine Akrich, The De-Scription of Technical Objects in Wiebe Bijker and John
Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies In Sociotechnical Change
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994): 205-224
Bruno Latour & M. Akrich, A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the
Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies in Wiebe Bijker and John Law
(eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies In Sociotechnical Change
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994): 259-264
11| 17-nov
** Both sections
meet @ Ryerson
12| 24-nov
Simran
Tanya
Edward L. Bernays, Molding Public Opinion. The Annals of the American Academy
of Political and Social Science 179 (1935): 82-87.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1020282
Guy Debord, Chapter 1 in The Society of the Spectacle (New York: Zone Books, 1994)
Ahsan