Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com
H O S T E D BY
ScienceDirect
Natural Gas Industry B 1 (2014) 144e149
www.elsevier.com/locate/ngib
Research article
Formula calculation methods of water content in sweet natural gas and their
adaptability analysis
Zhu Lin a,*, Fan Junming a, Zhu Jia a,b, Qin Li c, Li Luling a
b
a
School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
Suining Operation Zone, Chuanzhong Division of PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Suining, Sichuan 629000, China
c
Luzhou Carbon Black Plant, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, China
Abstract
Estimation of water content is the foundation of natural gas processing and designing, and a formula calculation method provides a solution
simple and easy to be programmed by computers. In this regard, several main formula calculation methods of water content in sweet natural gas
were reviewed and evaluated individually. There are formulas fitted with nomographic data (e.g. Sloan formula, Ning Yingnan formula, Khaled
formula and Bahadori formula), empirical formulas fitted with experimental data (e.g. Zhu Lin formula, Behr formula and Kazim formula) and
formulas generated based on water-hydrocarbon phases equilibrium (e.g. Saturated Vapor Pressure Model, Modified Ideal Model, Simplified
Thermodynamic Model and Bukacek formula). The comparison of calculated and experimental values of each above formula calculation method
indicates that, the Khaled formula provided the minimum average absolute deviation (AAD) e 2.524 0%, while the Behr method achieved the
maximum AAD e 19.255%. After the analysis of the AAD results calculated by the methods at different temperature ranges, the Zhu Lin
formula is recommended for 50 to 40 C, the Sloan formula for 40 to 0 C, the Simplified Thermodynamic Model for 0 to 37.78 C, the
Khaled formula for 37.78 to 171.11 C, and the Bukacek formula for 171.11 to 237.78 C.
2015 Sichuan Petroleum Administration. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Keywords: Natural gas; Sweet natural gas; Water content; Formula calculation method; Average absolute deviation (AAD); Evaluation; Method
1. Introduction
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: zhulinswpi@gmail.com (Z. Lin).
Peer review under responsibility of Sichuan Petroleum Administration.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2014.11.004
2352-8540/ 2015 Sichuan Petroleum Administration. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
WH2 O 16:02 exp a1 a2 ln p a3 a4 ln p =
2
T 273:15 a5 =T 273:15 a6 ln p 2
M j yj
28:966
bi T 273:15 7
5
4
p
i1
4
The values of coefficients ai and bi (i 1, 2, ,5) in above
equation are shown in Table 3.
2.1.4. Bahadori's formula
Bahadori presented that the water content in sweet natural
gas was the function of the temperature T and lgp and derived
Equation (5) through numerical fitting [13].
WH2 O 10
3 X
3
X
i0
145
Table 2
Coefficients in Equation (2).
p/MPa
a0
a1
a2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.5
2
3
4
5
6
8
15
20
30
40
50
60
70
1.544412
0.913996
0.481486
0.259524
0.107676
0.164630
0.387960
0.945970
1.172380
1.499380
1.649210
1.913820
1.963050
2.162460
2.326270
2.395928
2.447437
2.620645
2.627157
2.601997
2.727667
0.0681
0.0651
0.0648
0.0636
0.0618
0.0612
0.0630
0.0607
0.0581
0.0576
0.0569
0.0597
0.0567
0.0576
0.0513
0.0499
0.0467
0.0474
0.0457
0.0436
0.0456
1.7452
1.4347
1.4216
1.3668
1.2643
1.1875
1.2884
1.1534
1.0108
1.0113
1.0085
1.1618
1.0264
1.0912
8.4136
8.1751
7.0353
7.4510
6.9094
6.1641
7.1151
WH2 O 101:325 i0
bi Ti
6
p
i0
The values of coefficients ai and bi (i 1, 2, ,7) are
shown in Table 5.
2.2.2. Behr's formula
Behr regarded the water content in sweet natural gas as the
function of lnp and 1/(T 273.15) and developed Equation (7)
through numerical fitting [15].
"
2
a2 a3 ln p a4 ln p
WH2 O a0 exp a1
a5 ln p
2
T 273:15
2
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
104
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
a6 ln p a7 ln p
aij Tj lg p 3
a8 a9 ln p a10 ln p a11 ln p
2
j0
T 273:15
#
7
Table 3
Coefficients in Equation (4).
Table 1
Coefficients in Equation (1).
Coefficient
Value
Coefficient
Value
a1
a2
a3
21.58610805
1.280044975
4808.426205
a4
a5
a6
113.0735222
40377.6358
3.8508508 102
Coefficient
Value
Coefficient
Value
a1
a2
a3
a4
a5
706652.14
8915.814
42.607133
0.0915312
7.46945105
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
2 893.11193
41.86941
0.229899
5.68959104
5.36847107
146
Table 4
Coefficients in Equation (5).
Coefficient
Value
Coefficient
Value
a00
a01
a02
a03
a10
a11
a12
a13
3.898038226
0.066005465
0.0002265
5.6739 107
0.903079754
0.04014974
0.000252477
3.12335 108
a20
a21
a22
a23
a30
a31
a32
a33
0.681296943
0.0138755
0.000106082
1.34843 107
7.713313022
0.026385968
1.28171 105
2.42011 108
WH2 O 16:02A1 A2
Ai
4
X
j1
aij
j1
145p 350
600
8
9
T 273:15
Tc 273:15
10
l1
f l
psw pc exp
l
11
2
c
f l 7:21275 a0:745 l b0:745 l
12
13
5 T 2 123:96820
16
Equation (15) is applicable for a state of gaseliquid equilibrium [20] and Equation (16) for a state of gasesolid equilibrium [21].
2.3.3. Simplified thermodynamic model (STM)
The water content estimated with a thermodynamic model
would be of high accuracy, but the process is complex [4,5].
Therefore, some simplified models have been developed, e.g.
Equation (17) [22,23].
psw
p psw VH2 O
WH2 O 761900:42
exp
17
4H2 O p
RT 273:15
30:905
p
4H2 O exp 0:069
T 273:15
0:3179
0:0007654 p2
T 273:15
18
20
Table 7
Coefficients in Equation (9).
Coefficient
Value
Coefficient
Value
a0
a1
a2
a3
a4
a5
a6
a7
4.65925
3.37802 101
1.11426 102
2.04372 104
1.91021 106
1.56275 108
1.99046 106
1.23039 1012
b0
b1
b2
b3
b4
b5
b6
b7
46.7351
4.60019
8.68387 103
4.65719 103
9.32789 105
2.06031 106
4.78943 108
2.37537 1010
psw
16:016 10
p
1716:26
T273:156:69449
21
147
Tc T
Tc 273:15
23
Coefficient
j
1
2
3
4
Temperature/ C
T < 37.78
37.78 T 82.22
a1j
a2j
a1j
a2j
4.34322
1.35912
6.82391
3.95407
1.03776
0.02865
0.04198
0.01945
10.38175
3.41588
7.93877
5.8495
1.02674
0.01235
0.02313
0.01155
1X
Wexperimental Wcalculated
AAD
24
100%
N i1
Wexperimental
where, i denotes the ith set of data and N denotes the number
of data set.
As shown in Table 9, Khaled's formula generated the
smallest average error, followed by simplified thermodynamic
model and Bukacek's formula; Behr's formula yielded the
maximum AAD.
Those methods with AAD less than 10% included STM,
Khaled, Bukacek, Bahadori, Zhu Lin and Sloan. Zhu Lin's
formula would be the most precise one for the temperature
range from 50 to 40 C, Sloan's formula for 40 to 0 C,
STM for 0e37.78 C, Khaled's formula for 37.78e171.11 C,
and Bukacek's formula for 171.11e237.78 C.
4. Conclusions
Value
Coefficient
Value
a0
a1
a2
a3
a4
a5
16.018489
15.01438824
1397805.38
1.20055
0.12061
0.55096
a6
a7
a8
a9
a10
a11
0.70827
0.09904
129261863
1.29214
0.25962
0.01738
Temperature/ C
Pressure/MPa
40.00 ~ 48.89
/
37.78 ~ 171.11
15 ~ 120
50 ~ 140
/
<82.22
/
/
0 ~ 104.44
15.56 ~ 237.78
1.38 ~ 13.80
0.1 ~ 100.0
1.38 ~ 69.00
1 ~ 15
0.1 ~ 100.0
1.38 ~ 20.7
2 ~ 8.3
/
/
13.8
0.1 ~ 69.0
148
Table 9
Calculated and experimental water contents.
T/ C
1.50
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.0
6.02
6.00
10.0
0.51
1.07
2.42
3.66
17.6
17.5
10.0
17.5
0.53
1.10
1.92
3.11
4.17
0.51
1.52
2.92
4.90
0.57
1.53
Experimental value
(mg$m3)
476.19
387.81
281.14
228.57
198.09
239.24
540.95
318.47
6453.3
3276.2
1508.6
967.61
338.28
430.47
861.71
592.00
17219
8076.1
4906.6
3017.1
2323.8
30247
10210
5500.9
3451.4
52495
19276
Calculated value/(mg$m3)
Sloan
Ning Yingnan
Khaled
Bahadori
Zhu Lin
494.20
415.63
304.76
246.42
209.90
304.00
532.04
364.03
e
e
1466.9
1034.4
323.20
416.73
801.24
532.88
e
e
4676.41
3073.81
2398.22
e
e
e
e
e
e
7.0732
527.84
445.33
324.38
268.79
236.96
268.99
543.96
317.88
4999.1
2444.9
1358.5
1092.5
406.08
508.76
1099.9
636.17
14,232
6357.5
5570.4
2523.0
2150.1
22,394
7132.2
6948.3
4047.0
49,088
13002
16.676
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
518.89
437.92
327.86
272.84
239.82
327.13
543.82
382.27
6596.8
3406.9
1524.2
1053.6
350.16
442.17
812.09
564.02
17685
8464.9
5052.1
3240.6
2495.6
30064
10517
5848.7
3693.3
52603
19677
7.9111
841.55
594.88
17,266
8281.8
4955.5
3190.4
2464.6
29404.0
10,289
5723.0
3615.1
51,464
19,266
2.5240
410.11
303.32
249.41
216.80
302.61
536.80
379.58
e
3222.6
1480.4
1041.0
362.13
466.92
847.66
597.15
e
7984.4
4840.7
3168.5
2474.8
e
9970.8
5650.7
3642.1
50512
18724
6.1452
Behr
344.22
412.64
281.23
206.38
160.56
280.26
498.45
283.29
e
1468.2
1364.3
1041.5
202.39
265.26
640.37
343.74
e
e
3880.4
3074.3
2438.2
e
6528.1
5342.0
3508.2
e
11979
19.255
Kazim
SVPM
MIM
STM
Bukacek
e
415.99
301.59
279.21
e
300.85
523.31
e
e
e
1678.9
1045.9
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
3868.7
2659.7
e
e
8502.5
4302.9
e
e
18.819
442.96
324.96
216.61
162.45
129.95
215.89
398.02
238.76
6399.4
3209.8
1345.3
880.24
184.99
245.21
566.19
321.72
17527
8104.0
4668.7
2861.1
2121.1
30263
9939.7
5211.2
3084.4
54358
18871
15.067
442.73
324.86
216.57
162.43
129.94
215.85
397.88
238.73
6347.6
3197.2
1343.3
879.43
184.99
245.20
566.00
321.71
17143
8023.4
4643.0
2852.1
2116.5
29134
9820.7
5180.6
3074.8
50819
18444
15.402
470.92
375.95
268.55
215.23
183.49
267.84
483.64
326.59
6451.9
3306.7
1450.3
986.98
e
e
739.75
e
17371
8255.3
4879.5
3090.0
2355.0
29458
10164
5533.2
3430.8
51296
18971
3.4671
e
414.62
306.35
252.22
219.73
305.63
538.49
379.45
6518.7
3377.2
1518.9
1054.7
361.63
463.34
834.36
589.26
17502
8390.5
5016.9
3226.7
2490.6
29657
10371
5741.6
3637.6
51664
19335
4.6350
5.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
24.8
24.8
30.0
30.8
30.0
29.9
30.0
35.0
40.0
40.0
48.9
48.7
48.9
48.8
48.7
59.5
59.6
59.9
59.8
74.2
74.0
AAD
p/MPa
(4.6350%) and Bahadori's formula (6.1452%). Behr's formula will generate the maximum AAD of 19.255%.
(3) Under the condition that the formula is applicable, Zhu
Lin's formula is recommended for the temperature range
from 50 to 40 C, Sloan's formula from 40 to 0 C,
simplified thermodynamic model within 0e37.78 C,
Khaled's formula within 37.78e171.11 C and Bukacek's
formula within 171.11e237.78 C.
Fund project
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
u1262111).
References
[1] Zhu Lin. Natural gas processing engineering. 2nd ed. Beijing: Petroleum
Industry Press; 2008. p. 59e62.
[2] Luo Qin, Qiu Shaolin. Synopsis to standard of analysis test methods of
water content in natural gas. Chem Eng Oil Gas 2000;29(2):96e9.
[3] Chen Siding, Fu Jianmei, Zhang Zhe. Evaluation on calculation formulas
for water content in natural gas. Nat Gas Oil 2012;30(6):27e30.
[4] Mohammadi AH, Chapoy A, Richon D, Tohidi B. Experimental measurement and thermodynamic modeling of water content in methane and
ethane systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 2004;43(22):7148e62.
[5] Erbar JH, Jagota AK, Muthswamy S, Moshfeghian M, Lukie M. RR-42
predicting synthetic gas and natural gas thermodynamic properties using
a modified Soave Redlich Kwong Equation of State. Gas processors
association research report. Oklahoma: GPA; 1980.
[6] Mohammadi AH, Dominique R. Use of artificial neural networks for
estimating water content of natural gases. Ind Eng Chem Res
2007;46(4):1431e8.
[7] Carroll JJ. Natural gas hydrates: a guide for engineers. New York: Gulf
Professional Publishing; 2003. p. 232e46.
[8] Kobayashi R, Song K, Sloan E. Phase behavior of water/hydrocarbon
systems. In: Bradley HB, Gipson FW, Larry WL, Kenneth EA, editors.
Petroleum Engineering Handbook. New York: SPE; 1987. 12e3.
[9] Sloan ED. Clathrate hydrate of natural gases. New York: Marcel Dekker
Inc; 1998.
149