Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 19

Mary E. Torrence DVM, Ph.D.

, DACVPM
National Program Leader, Food Safety
USDA, ARS

Multi-disciplinary
Cross-cutting
Not a linear process of transmission and cause, but
rather a web
Requires integrated and collaborative efforts in
research, surveillance, control and interventions

Congressional and public health

GAO report on Antibiotic Use in Animals

US Public Health Action Plan (interagency task force)

Collect detailed antibiotic use in food animals, work


with industry, and seek resources and evaluate
effectiveness

Modify NARMS, especially animal and retail

Assess previous research efforts on alternatives,


identify research gaps, and specify steps in the Action
Plan to address them

Public meeting, November 15th, Washington DC

Chaired by Interagency Task Force on AR, specifically


by FDA, NIH, and CDC

Updated annually and released on the web

This year, specifies goals, action items, projects, and


implementation steps

Surveillance
Prevention and Control
Research
Product Development

Surveillance
Determine, monitor and characterize drug resistance in humans
and animals
Define, characterize, and measure importance of antimicrobial
use in humans and animals

Develop, implement, and evaluate strategies to prevent


emergence, transmission, and persistence
Develop, implement, and improve appropriate use of
antibiotics

Basic, clinical, translational


Epidemiology- for drivers of emergence and spread of
a.r.
Advanced research and development contracts to
facilitate progress in antimicrobial drug and vaccine
candidates through the pipeline

Rapid diagnostics

Harmonization of susceptibility testing

New Product development

Surveillance

Updating of database, web interface, quicker


reports, and IT (NARMS)
Re-evaluate and modify the animal arms sampling
(NARMS)
Continued collaborations with NAHMS
Collaborations with universities
Other databases (NCBI), Vetnet

Pilot in Swine in collaboration with OSU and Russell


Research Center, industry

Pilot in feedlot, dairy, and poultry in collaboration with


4 Universities, industry, and several ARS centers.

NIFA supposed to fund $4 million in special emphasis


grants only 1 this year for less than $2 million
Evaluate critical control points for resistance in food
animals
Promote research, development of processing
technologies (in eggs, poultry, and feedlot)

Clay Center- research on sprays, sanitizers, and


physical interventions (like wash cabinets) to reduce
pathogen contamination

Russell- research on alternatives to current antibiotic


rinses and sanitizers in poultry and as interventions in
egg production

Risk factors for transmission and persistence (e.g.


darkling beetles as risk factors, and also as models for
plasmid transfer)

Evaluation of risk factors for persistence and


fluctuations of E.coli, Salmonella sp. In dairy cattle

Mechanisms for development of resistance,


gene transfer, host-pathogen interaction
Risk factors for development and transfer of
genes (e.g. biofilms)
omics- but what does the data mean?

Micro-arrays for detections of multiple resistant


pathogens
To evaluate clonal or plasmid transfer

On steering committees and as support


contracts
Epidemiologic studies to explore Salmonella
and MDR in cattle- dissemination of the MDR
AmpC phenotype in commensals
Evaluation of Salmonella in lymph nodes of
cattle

Alternatives to antibiotics (includes vaccines, natural


ingredients, immune modulators, management
practices)

Strengthening collaborative efforts and integrating


basic and applied research with population-based
studies (field)

Epidemiology- sampling, population-based studies,


design of outcome measurements

Measure outcomes/impact of interventions, control, or


even policy

Technology and methods?

Вам также может понравиться