Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect
Procedia Technology 9 (2013) 114 119

CENTERIS 2013 - Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems / ProjMAN 2013 - International


Conference on Project MANagement / HCIST 2013 - International Conference on Health and Social
Care Information Systems and Technologies

A Conceptual Model for Adaptive ERP Courses


Dirk Peters* and Jorge Marx Gmez
Carl von Ossietzky Universitt Oldenburg, Ammerlnder Heerstr. 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany

Abstract
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have a very high potential to illustrate the versatile use of information systems
in todays companies and help to understand the integration of business processes for students. Higher education institutes
need to react on the changing demand in the employee market and offer adequate, practical courses on ERP. Existing ERP
courses are ignoring the previous knowledge and the individual progress of students coming from different programs of
study. Therefore, we are presenting a conceptual model for adaptive ERP courses in order to create individual learning
material based on the students interaction with the ERP system.
2013 The
Authors
Publishedby
byElsevier
Elsevier Ltd.
access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
2013
Published
Ltd.Open
Selection
and/or peer-review under responsibility of
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of SCIKA Association for Promotion and Dissemination of
CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCIST.
Scientific Knowledge
Keywords: ERP; ERP System; ERP Education; Information Systems; IS Education; ERP Learning Material; ERP Case Studies; Adaptive
ERP; Conceptual Model; Adaptive Learning System.

1. Introduction
The relevance for an adequate information system-education (IS education), or enterprise system-education
(ES education) in general, in the field of higher education-institutes (HE institutes) has rapidly grown in the last
decade. The demand of companies in the employment market has changed in a way that todays students need
to bring skills in planning, implementing and using such systems on a very high (often strategic) level

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-441-798-4475; fax: +49-441-798-4472.


E-mail address: dirk.peters@uni-oldenburg.de.

2212-0173 2013 The Authors Published by Elsevier Ltd. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of SCIKA Association for Promotion and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge
doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.012

Dirk Peters and Jorge Marx Gmez / Procedia Technology 9 (2013) 114 119

[1, 2, 3]. Especially, students coming from the fields of informatics, economics and business informatics are
affected by this skills shift and they need to match a specific profile to be prepared for their future work life [4,
5]. Therefore, it is a major challenge of HE institutes (e.g. universities) to be responsive to this changing matter
in IS education in a proper way that students get in contact with the systems, in theory as well as in practice [6,
7]. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems have a very high potential to illustrate the integration of
business processes in todays versatile companies. Affected by different business areas, like finance,
controlling, production planning, material management, etc., ERP systems can give a very good overview of the
implementation of business processes in the IT-landscape of a company. Starting from gathering the
requirements for an ERP implementation, going through the selection of a specific ERP software vendor and
ending up in the customization and using the concrete system, ERP systems can address a huge amount of ISrelated topics. Also, more technical issues, such as the integration data and/or functions of different systems
into one centralized (ERP) system, can be covered with the use of ERP systems in ERP training courses.
The practical use of ERP systems is one of the major challenges when trying to offer a hands onexperience to students on the basis of a real ERP implementation in form of case studies e.g. In the literature,
there are different methods described how to (successfully) make use of real ERP systems in a training course
[2, 6, 8, 9]. There are also some ERP software vendors, like SAP for example, who offer a widely accepted
University Alliances Program for universities in order to bring students in contact with their products [10].
Unfortunately, the existing approaches for practical ERP training courses are lacking for different reason,
which are described in detail in the next section (section 2). After presenting the objectives of our research
(section 3) and having a look at related work in this area of research (section 4), the conceptual model for
adaptive ERP courses is illustrated and specified (section 5). Finally, a conclusion with a short summary and an
outlook for the future steps is given in the last section (section 6).
2. Problem Definition
When analyzing the existing ERP training courses from different ERP software vendors, ERP training
concepts from universities and existing approaches coming from the scientific area, it becomes obvious that the
existing training methods do not consider the individual previous knowledge and the learning progress of the
different students within a specific course. Mostly, the ERP training course material is paper-based and has a
linear sequence of exercises. Furthermore, there are no different levels of difficulty so that neither the sequence
nor the exercise description differs according to the individual state of the student resp. the learner. In regular
ERP courses at a university, the students have a different background of knowledge and skills (depending on
their experience or field of study in interdisciplinary ERP courses), but the learning material does only address
a group of students, which are very heterogeneous in their style of learning as well. Some students are working
on a case study-exercise very active and reach the learning target very quick. Some others need more theoretical
information about the specific functions or a visual support in navigation in order to complete an exercise task
with satisfaction.
Another problem can arise not from the students side, but more from the teachers side: When the students
are doing a practical exercise at the ERP system, errors can occur or students make mistakes while entering data
or performing a specific transaction. For the tutor this can sometimes be difficult to analyze the source of error
and find an appropriate solution in a suitable period of time. In general, courses have up to 30 students working
at the same time on the same system and all are assisted by only one tutor. The tutors do not have an
appropriate overview of the progress of the different students or students groups working on a set of exercises.
A common method of teaching practical ERP content is making the use of case studies. But unfortunately, if
they are delivered by the ERP software vendors, they often do not have a deeper didactical basis, because they
only include technical and functional issues of the system. Therefore, the description text of the exercise is

115

116

Dirk Peters and Jorge Marx Gmez / Procedia Technology 9 (2013) 114 119

often in a form of brief instructions, which rather facilitate a fast click-through than a critical thinking by the
students [6].
3. Objectives
The aim of our research (in general) is to develop an adaptive ERP learning system, which allows to track
(or log) the students interaction in a real ERP system during an ERP course. Based on this tracking information,
it should be made possible, to analyze the performance of a single student with respect to the overall learning
target. As a result of this analyzing phase, the system should be able to offer individual learning material
coming from a pool of different exercises, which vary in the level of difficulty, exercise description and/or
visual format. Additionally, the technology-supported system should give an overview for the tutors of the
success (or difficulties) of different students or students groups in a concrete ERP course.
In order to reach this overall research target, it is necessary to define a conceptual model, which allows an
overview for a future implementation of the final ERP learning system. The focus of the conceptual model
and the innovative character of the approach is the integration of the learning system with a real ERP system.
So, the main research question, which will be addressed by this contribution, is: How can tracking
information, coming from a real ERP system, be integrated into an adaptive learning environment in order to
control and enhance the learning progress of individual students?
4. Related Work and Novelty of the Approach
This research is related to the widely-discussed field of Intelligent Learning Systems (ITS) [11] and
Adaptive Hypermedia (AH) systems [12]. Normally, existing ITS are used in very different domains
(programming, mathematics, geography, medicine, etc.) and are also designed for a very broad target group
ranging from first grader to domain experts. Therefore, the success of different implementations of ITS also
varies in like manner [13]. The major advantages of ITS or AH systems in general are the creation of individual
learning material for a single learner, the time- and location independence and the possibility to enhance
existing training courses with an interactive learning experience (e.g. blended learning). Besides these
advantages, ITS and AH systems also come with some disadvantages which are mostly focusing on the very
time-consuming and extremely complicated development of these systems. It is necessary to have
programming experts for the development, professional tutors to design effective learning material and domain
experts which can deliver the relevant content for the learning material [14].
At the moment there are no existing ITS or AH systems which cover the domain of ERP courses for HE
institutes. Especially, the enrichment of the user model with trace-file information coming from the ERP
system legitimates our new approach in this highly relevant research domain. In the following section the
conceptual model for adaptive ERP courses is presented.
5. Conceptual Model
As a characteristic of a conceptual model, the following model description is neither defined for a specific
ERP system nor a concrete technology which should be used for a future implementation. Based on the
requirements analysis of a former literature review in the field of ERP education and adaptive learning
environments, the conceptual model in Fig. 1 was designed. As a common method, we used the widely
accepted Martin-notation by James Martin [cf. 15].

Dirk Peters and Jorge Marx Gmez / Procedia Technology 9 (2013) 114 119

117

Fig. 1. Conceptual Model for Adaptive ERP Courses

In the following, the main parts of the conceptual model in Fig. 1 are described more in detail. Due to the
limitations of this contribution not every aspect of the model can be presented here. Furthermore, the attributes
of the different entities have been omitted for clarity purposes.
First of all, it is necessary, to split an ERP course into a hierarchy of ERP-relevant content. Therefore, it is
proposed, that an overall Course, like ERP Basics or ERP for Economics is split into different Lectures.
These can be for example Finance, Controlling or Human Resources in order to teach specific
components of an ERP system and split different topics into smaller parts of a whole Course. A Lecture
consists of a set of Exercises, which are generated by the tutor of the course. These Exercises can be adopted by
existing case studies a tutor usually uses for his/her regular ERP course. An example for an exercise could be:
Create a material R-105 in Material Management. In order to address to different types of students, the
Teacher also needs to provide different Variations of an Exercise. A Variation belongs to the same Exercise,
but has a different Description, e.g. in easy, advanced and professional format. The easy Variation can
consists of are more detailed description in comparison to the advanced or professional Variation. In the
end, these Variations allow the individual generation of the learning material for each single student.
The Students are using the ERP System and get their learning material (respectively their Exercises in
different Variations) from a Learn Management System (LMS). In the LMS the Students are assigned to one of
the Courses. While the students are working with the ERP System, a Trace-File is generated, which protocols
the main interactions of the Student in the ERP System. The Trace-File information enriches a User Model,
which is the model of the real student. The user model is a very important part for adaptive learning systems.
Furthermore, Students are able to maintain personal interests, such as previous knowledge or prior skills, within
the LMS, which also enriches their User Model. Based on the User Model and existing Rules, the Adaptation of
the learning material (in form of choosing the Lecture and the Variation of an Exercise) can be done. These
Rules need to be defined by a Teacher and they describe the adaptation behavior. An example of this behavior
can be: Show the same exercise with a variation with the attribute easy, if the student creates an error or
Display additional background information if the student asks for help or clicks on the wrong button. In order
to make sure that the adaptive learning system knows about the occurring errors, it is necessary to define

118

Dirk Peters and Jorge Marx Gmez / Procedia Technology 9 (2013) 114 119

Solutions for each Exercise. An Exercise can have different Solutions (the students can reach their learning
target in an ERP System in different ways, because business process are not linear and be completed through
different transactions), which are mapped with a so called Completion Indicator. The Completion Indicator is
ERP system-specific and refers to the information in the Trace-File. If a transaction in the ERP System is
completed (for example the Trace-File shows the status message: material R-105 successfully created), this
can be defined as the Completion Indicator of one Solution of an Exercise. When a Student has successfully
completed a set of Exercises in a Lecture, the learning system will save this information in the User Model. In
the next session, the learning system might then propose are more advanced Lecture with a different set of
Exercises.
The teacher can get an overview of all students, who are part of the course and analyze the performance of
the participants with respect to different aspects. Then, the teacher can optimize the descriptions of the
variations for future courses, e.g. if a high amount of students get stuck at the same problem. In future, it is
thinkable, that different teachers can create a pool of different ERP courses with very detailed variations and
descriptions in order to allow other teachers to make use of this system. In an initial phase of the approach, it is
necessary that a minimum set of different variations are delivered to guarantee the individual usage as
described in the objectives of this work. The reuse of learning material is much easier within an electronic
learning environment [16]. This is very important, because the systems are changing a lot due to software
updates and new software releases. Thus, the user interface can have a different look in a newer version or
further functions are implemented, which also should be part of future, easy adaptable learning material.
6. Conclusions and Future Work
In this contribution we presented a conceptual model for practical, adaptive ERP courses. Based on a
literature review, we found out that existing approaches in science and practice are not addressing the individual
state of students within an ERP training course in HE institutes. In the related work, we described existing
technologies, which can be used for a new solution. By enhancing the user model with trace-file information
coming directly from the ERP system, it is possible to measure the performance of each single student in a
practical ERP course. This information can be used to offer personalized learning material which meets the
concrete requirements of this single student. Furthermore, the electronic tracking of the students behavior can
give a better overview for the teacher of the course in order to give a better assistance in the course. The
conceptual model describes how this adaptation process can be executed. The electronic learning material can
be optimized and stored for future courses and shared between other HE institutes.
Based on the conceptual model, the next step of our research is to develop a software system architecture,
which allows the concrete implementation of the adaptive learning system. There, the focus is on the integration
of a real ERP system with an existing LMS like Moodle (http://www.moodle.org) for example. For the other
related topics existing standard can be used. The description of the learning material as a hierarchy of tasks can
be done by SCORM, which is a Sharable Content Object Reference Model the describe course material [17].
Furthermore, the adaptation process is investigated very well by the literature. The GRAPPLE project
(http://www.grapple-project.org) is one example for a successful implementation of a personalized adaptive
learning environment, which already delivers an adaptation engine and associated rules [18]. The learning
material can be adapted from existing courses in order to have an initial set of ERP exercises. Regarding the
analysis of the transaction data, methods and tools coming from the very new field of Learning Analytics also
need to be taken into account [19]. At the end of our research, a prototype can be implemented as a proof-ofconcept and tested in a real scenario within a HE institute and a follow-up evaluation.

Dirk Peters and Jorge Marx Gmez / Procedia Technology 9 (2013) 114 119

References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]

[7]

[8]
[9]
[10]

[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]

[19]

Konradin Business GmbH, 2011. Konradin ERP-Studie 2011: Einsatz von ERP-Lsungen in der Industrie. Leinfelden-Echterdingen:
Konradin Mediengruppe.
Cameron, B. H.,2008. Enterprise Systems Education: New Directions & Challenges for the Future. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings,
p. 119126.
Boyle, T. A., Strong, S. E., 2006. Skill Requirements of ERP Graduates. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(4),
p. 403413.
Scholtz, B., 2011. A Framework for the Adoption of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Higher Education. Nelson
Mandela Metropolitan University.
Hawking, P., McCarthy, B., Stein, A., 2004. Second Wave ERP Education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(3),
p. 327332.
Winkelmann, A., Holler, J., Pster, J., Heide, T., 2012. Lernerfolg durch ERP-System-Vergleich Einsatz von SAP Business
ByDesign und SAP ERP in der Lehre. In D. C. Mattfeld, S. Robra-Bissantz (Eds.), Proceedings Multikonferenz der
Wirtschaftsinformatik - MKWI 2012 (pp. 525536). Berlin: GITO
Peters, D., Haak, L., Marx Gmez, J., 2012. Adaptive Learning Cycle to improve the Competence-Building for Enterprise Systems in
Higher Education. Organizational Integration of Enterprise Systems and Resources: Advancements and Applications, IGI Global, p.
7699.
Hawking, P., McCarthy, B., Stein, A., 2005. Integrating ERPs Second Wave into Higher Education Curriculum. Proceedings of the
9th PACIS Conference 2005, p. 10011008.
Strong, D., Fedorowicz, J., Sager, J., Stewart, G., Watson, E. E., 2006. Teaching with Enterprise Systems. Communications of the
Association for Information Systems, 17(33), p. 728755.
Konstantinidis, C., Kienegger, H., Wittges, H., Krcmar, H., 2010. Planspiele in der ERP-Lehre: Eine empirische Untersuchung
deutscher Bildungseinrichtungen. In M. Schumann, L. M. Kolb, M. H. Breitner, A. Frerichs (Eds.), Multikonferenz
Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010 (pp. 17091721). Gttingen: Universittsverlag.
Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., 1997. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, P. Prabhu
(Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (Second, Co., pp. 849874). New York: Elsevier Science B.V.
Brusilovsky, P., 1996. Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3),
p. 87129.
Schulmeister, R., 2007. Grundlagen hypermedialer Lernsysteme: Theorie - Didaktik - Design (4th ed.). Mnchen [u.a.]: Oldenbourg.
Csizmadia, V., 2003. Constructing an Authoring Tool for Intelligent Tutoring Systems with Hierarchical Domain Models. Worcester
Polytechnic Institute.
Martin, J. (1993). Principles of Object Oriented Analysis and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Baumgartner, P., Kalz M., 2005. Wiederverwendung von Lernobjekten aus didaktischer Sicht. In Tavangarian, D., Nlting, K. (Eds.).
Auf zu neuen Ufern! E-Learning heute und morgen, Vol. 34 (pp. 97-106). New York, Mnchen, Berlin: Waxmann.
Watson, J., Hardaker, G., 2005. Steps towards personalised learner management system (LMS): SCORM implementation. CampusWide Information Systems, 22(2), p. 5670.
De Bra, P., Smits, D., Van Der Sluijs, K., Cristea, A., Hendrix, M., 2010. GRAPPLE: Personalization and Adaptation in Learning
Management Systems Communication between an ALE and LMS in GRAPPLE. In J. Herrington, B. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of
the 22nd World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2010). Chesapeake, VA:
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bltmann, M., Chatti, M. A., Schrder, U. 2012. Design and Implementation of a Learning Analytics
Toolkit for Teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), p. 5876.

119

Вам также может понравиться