Plan Columbia, Peace Columbia or More?

A Look Into the Different Iterations of

Plan Colombia

Renego Juan Turuwantu, Suvedh Shanlar

University of Colombia, San Pao

*The authors wish to thank the participants at John_Vick Lamar Institute, and the Strakeburough University for providing us with
details that simply could not be found without their help.
Corresponding Author Prof..Daniel Wang
Corresponding Author Prof.Dede Dede

AbstractFrom the 80s and on Colombia has been ravaged by the drug war. The Clinton
Administration had passed what would be one of most controversial extensions
by the United States into Latin America. The Obama Administration recently
passed what would be called Peace Colombia, or as some call it Plan Colombia
2.0. However, this paper aims to further there is a third Plan Colombia, or 3.0, or
Conflict Colombia. Due to a recent Push by the United States in Latin America,
the U.S wishes to establish itself in the region due to growing conflict in
Venezuela. Due to the growing conflict in the region, and the abundance of oil.
Plan Colombia 3.0 hatches what some officials call U.S matrimony in the
region.

I. Introduction

Tocday the United states is showing itself as a weakening hegemon in

the world. As China flexes its power in the Asian Sea, and Russia
continues to show its regional dominance by bulldozing every country in
the south of Europe (Hurt 15). The United States is loosing ground fairly
quickly in the fast world of foreign politics. Due to this on
the 8th of March 2016, the United States decided to enact Conflict
Colombia. The exact details of the plan is to A. create a regional
dominance in the region via. Military bases, and B. Use military action
to calm a failing Venezuela. As Nicols Maduro administration
continues to roll into chaos, the entire state will be put into a crisis, a
large reason for this are the rising food prices (Lester Brown). And as
the conflict grows, Colombia will be at the for front to conflict of
refugee crises. Corresponding Author Prof.Daniel Wang writes, that the
United States responded with this problem by implementing Colombia
3.0 or the Conflict Colombia backup plan.

Hurt, Harrison. Laird lewis Semis Finals. Bulldoze eastern Europe.. Poly Prep Day county
Wang, Danial. Jesuit Strake, Some prep school in houston, Fung ,Anson voice is beautiful

II. The Model

The Stylized fact shows the US, intervening in the drug war in
Colombia has been the same deter and contain philosophy of the US. We
use varies models to determine the course of action the US will take.

Figure 1 shows the balance of power in Latin America

We model the war against drug production and trafficking as a

sequential game, in which there are 4 + n actors involved. These actors
are the government of the drug produc- ing country (henceforth the
government), the government of the drug consumer country (henceforth
the interested outsider), the drug trafficker, n illegal drug producers, and
a wholesale buyer who is located at the border of the consumer country.

These costs need not be the same for many different reasons. For instance, drug producers, as it is the case in Colombia, finance their terrorist
activities against the government (at least in part) from the income they receive from illegal drug production. Drug traffickers, on the other hand,
might use a different fraction of the proceeds from illegal drug trafficking to corrupt politicians, bribe the anti-narcotics police, and so forth.

We assume that the government faces a net cost per unit of income
that drug producers are able to obtain from illegal drug production;
additionally, that it also faces a (perhaps different) net cost per unit of
income that the drug trafficker is able to obtain from illegal drug
trafficking. We also assume that the interested outsider grants the
military forces of the government two types of subsidies in an attempt to
strengthen their resolve in the war against illegal drug production and
against illegal drug trafficking. These subsidies consist of a fraction (1
) [0, 1) of the resources that the government spends on the conflict
with drug producers over the control of land suitable for cultivating
illegal crops, and a fraction (1 ) [0, 1) of the resources that the
government spends trying to interdict the illegal drug shipments.
The war against drug production and trafficking proceeds as follows:
These costs need not be the same for many different reasons. For instance, drug producers, as it is the case in
Colombia, finance their terrorist activities against the government (at least in part) from the income they receive
from illegal drug production. Drug traffickers, on the other hand, might use a different fraction of the proceeds from
illegal drug trafficking to corrupt politicians, bribe the anti-narcotics police, and so forth.

1. The interested outsider grants subsidies 1 and 1 to strengthen

the resolve of the government in the war against illegal drug production
and trafficking, respectively.
2. The government engages the n illegal drug producers in a conflict
over the control of arable land suitable for cultivating the crop necessary
to produce the illegal drug. We assume that, initially, there are n disjoint
pieces of land of size L/n, each of which is contested by each one of the
n drug producers with the government.

Behn, Nicholas, Togher, Leanne, Power, Emma and Heard, Rob. Evaluating communication training for paid carers of
people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, December 2012; 26(1314): 17021715.
Bernstein, Jay H. From the Ubiquitous to the Nonexistent: A Demographic Study of OCLC WorldCat, Library Resources &
Technical Services 50 (2): 79-90, Spring 2006.
Biggar, Paul, Nash, Nicholas, Williams, Kevin, and Gregg, David. 2008. An experimental study of sorting and branch
prediction. ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics. 12 (Jun. 2008), 1-39.

3. The n drug producers fight against each other over the control of the
land that the government does not control.
4. Once the illegal drug producers know how much land they control
(that is, how much raw material they have to produce illegal drugs), they
have to decide the amount of resources they invest in those factors that
are complementary to land in the production of illegal drugs, such as
chemicals, workshops, and other materials necessary for them.

III. Plan Colombia 3.0 (Contain

Colombia)
Honestly did u really read this far wtf.
Reasonable suspicion is critical to protecting students as well as insuring nothing illegal are on
school premises. Reasonable suspicion directly ensures safety in 3 ways: First-severely
discouraging contraband Benjamin Tiller [JD Candidate], Saint Louis University Law Journal, Winter 2014, The Problem with
Probable Cause http://www.slu.edu/Documents/law/Law%20Journal/Archives/LawJournal58-2/Tiller_Article.pdf

Benjamin Tiller from the Saint Louis University Law Journal writes in 2014:

A probable cause standard would frustrate the fulfillment of the resource officers duty,
make it harder for schools to keep contraband off school property, and
make it easier for students to conceal drugs or weapons at school. This high
standard will not mitigate drug and gun problems, but will make them worse. It will force
educators and resource officers to take the time to apply for a warrant
instead of immediately addressing a perceived threattime that in some
circumstances, Time is critical as Tiller explains that time applied for a
warrant:
could literally be the difference between life and death. Reasonable suspicion,
though, allows educators and resource officers the flexibility to search without wasting time obtaining a
warrant, and discourages students from bringing contraband to school.

Second-through directly allowing flexibility and bringing out officers to their fullest potential Tiller continues later in his essay:

Reasonable suspicion, though, allows educators and resource officers the flexibility to search
without wasting time obtaining a warrant, and discourages students from bringing contraband
to school. Third-through critical locker searches ason E. Yearout, Individualized School Searches and the Fourth
Amendment: What's a School District to do?, 10 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 489 (2002), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol10/iss2/ //
ENDI-JM

Jason Yearout writes: Other than items that are carried on a student's person, such as backpacks,
perhaps the area on which students most rely for storage of their personal items is their lockers. Additionally,

locker areas are places where students frequently socialize between classes and
broaden their educational experience by interacting with others, in a non-academic setting.

Unfortunately, all too often students use their lockers in furtherance of

activities that run afoul of state laws or school rules. Fourth-through
anonymous tips North Carolina Center for Safer Schools, 2016, What is "SPK UP NC"?,
http://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/JLOCJPS/2015
16%20Interim/March%2010,%202016%20Subcom%20Reports,%20Gangs,%20ICAC,%20HERO%20Grants/
008%20D S_Center_for_Safer_Schools_Gang_Prevention_2016-03-10.pdf // ENDI-JM

The North

Carolina Center for Safer School writes in 2016:

Being able to
report their fears is paramount in reducing these absences. Over 90 percent
of students say they would use an anonymous reporting tool if they had
one available. This is also important because over 80 percent of school
shooters tell someone before they act. An anonymous reporting tool
could help prevent many school shootings and other violent actions on
school campuses. SPK UP NC is a tangible anonymous application for smart phones that has been
Over 160,000 school children miss school each day in the United States out of fear.

developed with the needs of North Carolinas school children in mind.

IV. A Reasonable Suspicion of a

Cover Up
Honestly idk what I am doing with my life but oh well, guess I need to make this final
part look somewhat big so artists can cut from the beginning. To Captianaga y u ban
me and to Zamborz- I love your trick file, u have inspired me to be a tricks debater. Now
for more random stuff The impact is saving lives. Greenblatt of NPR explains in 2011, That
can lead to enormous death tolls. Earthquakes aren't getting bigger or more frequent, says
Raymond Pestrong, a San Francisco State University geologist, but they are occurring in more

crowded places. Cities such as Tehran, Iran; Istanbul; Caracas, Venezuela; and Manila, the
Philippines are vulnerable to quakes that could leave hundreds of thousands dead, if their regions
and structures don't become better prepared. One assessment done last year for the Filipino
government found that a quarter of the structures in urban areas could crumble in the event of an
earthquake. Thus, Melissa Chan from Time Magazine concludes, Natural disasters have killed
more than 600,000 people and left behind trillions of dollars in damages in the last two decades.
The presence of improved earthquake sensors could have the potential to save millions of lives,
all thanks to the Internet of Things. Subpoint B. Conflict Prevention Yogendran writes in 2002,
Terrain Evaluation In land based military operations, Military field commanders [need] would
like to know terrain conditions, elevations for maneuvering Armour carriers, tanks and for use of
various weapons. In addition, they need vegetation cover, road networks, and communication
lines with pin pointing accuracy for optimizing resource utilization. [As such], a detailed land
map with information on land use, terrain model and proximity of habitat is essential for military
operations. All these details must be available to the field commanders in a datum to match with
the equipment he uses for position fixing and communication in his area of operation. Any
discrepancy in these inputs may endanger the operation. Target assessment can be done if the
inputs are properly matched with the system used for firing the weapon. Magnetic variation,
gravitational information are required for sensitive military operations. The Internet of Things
allows for more detailed maps through Geographic Information Systems. These systems utilize
vast amounts of data to construct detailed and accurate maps of virtually any area. Therefore,
Lachman of the Rand Corporation writes in 2007 that Missions such as emergency response,
homeland defense and security, safety, and antiterrorism/force protection all have benefited from
improved preparation, planning, and response times, [and] better and more coordinated
decisionmaking, and better use of resources as a result of [geographic information systems] I&E
geospatial data assets, which can help save lives and protect property. The impact is improving
the effectiveness of peacekeeping operations. Lisa Hultman of the Swedish National Defense
Council empirically concludes that A country where a peace-keeping operation with an annual
budget of USD 15 million per year is in place has a 50% lower risk of major conflict than a
country without any PKO. A mission with an annual budget of 500 million has more than 80%
lower risk than the no-PKO country. Table 5 shows the results for a model distinguishing
between the different PKP mandates. This model is the basis for scenarios 5{8. Again, PKOs
seems to directly affect only the risk of major conflict. The estimate for traditional PKOS is
negative but not statistically significant. The parameter estimate implies that the risk of major
conflict is 35% lower in the presence of a traditional PKO. The estimate for the transformational
PKO is both much larger and clearly significant. It implies that a transformational PKO reduces
the risk of major conflict relative to no conflict by more than 90%. As a result, Paul Collier of
Oxford finds that The first cost-benefit analysis of peacekeeping initiatives reveals that the risk
of future conflict depends upon the scale of military deployment. Compared with no deployment,
spending $100 million on a [basic] peacekeeping initiative reduces the ten-year risk of conflict
from around 38% to 16.5%. At $200 million per year, the risk falls further, to around 12.8%. At
$500 million, it goes down to 9%, and at $850 million drops to 7.3%. Because of wars massive
costs, each percentage point of risk reduction is worth around $2.5 billion to the world. The most
expensive deployment reduces the risk of conflict by a massive 30 percentage points, with tenyear gains of $75 billion, compared to the overall cost of $8.5 billion. This is a very promising
investment. Peacekeeping is an even better deal when it is provided in the form of an over the
horizon security guarantee: a reliable commitment to dispatch troops if they are needed. A

guarantee could be offered by the UN or a regional power like the African Union to protect
governments that came to power through certified democratic elections. A guarantee [of
peacekeeping] could credibly help the world avoid three of the four new civil wars expected in
low-income countries in each decade. The strategy could also safeguard post-conflict societies
after an initial period (of about five years) when the presence of troops is necessary. Providing a
credible security force to cope with all of these risks would cost about $2 billion annually, but
the benefits from a significant reduction in the risk of conflict and faster economic growth
are between 11.5 and 39 times higher. With the Internet of Things, these missions will continue
to see success as mapping technology continues to improve.
Ridge y do u post your prep everywhere

Figure 2 shots some random graphs I put in here for no reason

V. Conclusion
The perplexing question is if NSDA really thinks we are fooled by
their corruption. Do they really think we cant tell that they rig rounds
to make a larger profit in endorsements and merchandise? Think
again, NSDA. Flukes like this simply do not happen. Regardless, its
comforting in these troubling times to know that Rengo 2212 is

evidently no longer a debate team; their cult-like following includes

several hundred debaters spread out across the United States, Puerto
Rico, Guam, Clear Creek, and a small following in the Chulym
community in East Siberia. The phenomenon is indicative of their
greater value now: they are no longer debaters they are
debate. The orgastic microcosm of talent and persuasion
possessed by these two quasi-humans motivates our human race to
push forward and seek excellence. We emphatically pray for the
resurrection of Rengo 2212 and the eradication of the debate
communitys false idols in the ultimate act of glory on judgement day.
For now, we must wait for Rengo2212 coming again next year.
Amen