Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Totals
Analysis
Application
Comprehension
Content Outline
Knowledge
1
1
20%
6.67%
6.67%
6.67%
6.67%
3
1
1
20%
6.67%
6.67%
Did the test blueprint show an appropriate representation of different levels of complexity
for each objective? As a Math Instructional Coach for my district I am required to build
assessments using the STAAR Blueprint as outlined by TEA. In doing this I don't have to
think of the complexity but rather how they breakdown questions and percentages based
on readiness and supporting SE's. As I reflect on this assessment I do think there was an
appropriate representation of complexities within the assessment. Percentages were only
13% off of one another and the levels of complexity created a fair and equitable
assessment that was based solely on the SE's assessed.
Did the blueprint show an appropriate representation of different levels of complexity for
each objective overall? Each objective on the assessment whether it be readiness of
supporting was well represented with the levels of complexity. When I think about the SE's
assessed I think that what was required of the student for each abjective represented a
balanced and equitable assessment. Items of course were embedded with process skills
which could increase the level of complexity based on the process skills intent.
What would you do differently if you were constructing an exam over the same objectives
this year? If creating this assessment again then I would try and get at least 4 questions for
the readiness skills and 2 for the supporting skills. Sometimes when an objective is
represented only once on an assessment data can be a bit misleading. The only
possibilities would be to receive 0% or 100%. I don't know that this type of data is
something you could use as reliable and valid. While being fair and equitable, assessments
must also meet a certain level of reliability and validity within the representation of the
objectives assessed.
Why would a teacher constuct a blueprint BEFORE a unit of study is developed? A test
blueprint is the perfect way of seeing instructionally how you should teach the objectives
you are presenting to the students. One common error that teachers make is they teach
SE's on a complexity level that is different than the way it will be assessed. This approach
creates a massive breakdown in the students ability to be successful on a test item.
Creating a blueprint like this before a unit began would require teachers to unpack the
standards in which they would have more clarity to the depth and complexity of the
individual objectives being taught withing this lesson. This approach would increase the
understanding by the teacher and create a filter down effect, due to better preperation, for
student understanding.
Total
Percentage
15
20%
33.33%
26.67%
20%
100%
20%