Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
344
16. Cacuci, D.G., Global optimization and sensitivity analysis, Nucl. Sci. Eng.,
104, 78, 1990.
17. Cacuci, D.G., Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis: I. Theory, Vol. 1,
Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2003.
18. Cacuci, D.G. and Hall, M.C.G., Efficient estimation of feedback effects with
application to climate models, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2063, 1984.
19. Cacuci, D.G. and Ionescu-Bujor, M., Adjoint sensitivity analysis of the
RELAP5/MOD3.2 two-fluid thermal-hydraulic code system: I. Theory,
Nucl. Sci. Eng., 136, 59, 2000.
20. Cacuci, D.G. and Ionescu-Bujor, M., Adjoint sensitivity and uncertainty
analysis for reliability/availability models, with application to the
International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility, A&QT-R 2002 (THETA
13), International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing,
Robotics, May 23-25, 2002, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2002.
21. Cacuci, D.G., Maudlin, P.J., and Parks, C.V., Adjoint sensitivity analysis of
extremum-type responses in reactor safety, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 83, 112, 1983.
22. Cacuci, D.G. and Wacholder, E., Adjoint sensitivity analysis for transient
two-phase flow, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 82, 461, 1982.
23. Campana, K.A., Radiation and cloud parameterization at the National
Meteorological Center, ECMWF Workshop on Clouds, Radiation, and the
Hydrological Cycle, 1990.
24. Campana, K.A., Use of cloud analyses to validate and improve modeldiagnostic clouds at NMC, ECMWF Workshop on Modelling, Validation
and Assimilation of Clouds, 1994.
25. Cess R.D., et al., Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models:
An update, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 12791, 1996.
26. Cess R.D. and Potter, G.L., Exploratory studies of the cloud radiative
forcing with a general circulation model, Tellus 39(A), 460, 1987.
27. Clement, R.T. and Winkler, R.L., Combining probability distributions from
experts in risk analysis, Risk Anal., 19, 187, 1999.
28. Conover, W.J., Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd ed., John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1980.
29. Cotter, S.C., A screening design for factorial experiments with interactions,
Biometrika, 66, 317, 1979.
30. Cowan, G., Statistical Data Analysis, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998.
31. Cruz, J.B., System Sensitivity Analysis, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross,
Stroudsburg, PA, 1973.
32. Cukier, R.I. et al., Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to
uncertainties in rate coefficients. I : Theory, J. Chem. Phys., 59, 3873, 1973.
33. Daniel, C., One-at-a-time-plans, J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 68, 353, 1973.
34. DAuria, F. and Giannotti, W., Development of a code with the capability of
internal assessment of uncertainty, Nuclear Technology, 131, 159, 2000.
35. Deif, A.S., Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Systems, Springer-Verlag, New
York, 1986.
References
345
346
References
347
69. Lacis, A.A. and Hansen, J.E., A parameterization for the absorption of solar
radiation in the Earths atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 118, 1974.
70. Li, Y. et al., Variational data assimilation with a semi-implicit global
shallow water equation model and its adjoint, Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1759,
1993.
71. Li, Z. and Navon, I.M., Sensitivity analysis of outgoing radiation at the top
of the atmosphere in the NCEP/MRF model, Journal of Geophysical
Research-Atmospheres, 103, 3801, 1998.
72. Lillie, R.A. et al., Sensitivity/Uncertainty analysis for free-in-air tissue
kerma at Hiroshima and Nagasaki due to initial radiation, Nucl. Sci. Eng.,
100, 105, 1988.
73. Lorenz, E.N. and Emanuel, K.A., Optimal sites for supplementary weather
observations: Simulation with a small model, Journal of the Atmospheric
Sciences, 55, No. 3, 399, 1998.
74. Lowe, P.R. and Ficke, J.M., The computation of saturation vapor pressure,
Tech. Pap. No. 4-74, Environmental Research Prediction Facility, Naval
Postgraduate School, Monterey, 27, [NTIS AD-7783161], 1974.
75. Madsen, H.O. et al., Methods of Structural Safety, Prentice Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
76. Manabe, S. and Strickler, R.F., Thermal equilibrium of an atmosphere with a
convective adjustment, J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 361, 1964.
77. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R.T., Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere
with a given distribution of relative humidity, J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 241, 1967.
78. McKay, M.D. et al., A comparison of three methods of selecting values of
input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code,
Technometrics, 21, 239, 1979.
79. McKay, M.D., Evaluating prediction uncertainty, Technical Report
NUREG/CR-6311, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Los Alamos
National Laboratories, 1995.
80. Moorthi, S. and Suarez, M.J., Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert: A
parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models, Mon.
Wea. Rev., 120, 978, 1992.
81. Morris, M.D., Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational
experiments, Technometrics, 33, 161, 1991.
82. Morss R. E., Emanuel, K.A., and Snyder, C., Adaptive observations in a
quasi-geostrophic model. 12th Conference on Numerical Weather
Prediction, 11-16 January 1998, Phoenix, Arizona, 10-11, 1998.
83. Navon, I.M. et al., Variational data assimilation with an adiabatic version of
the NMC spectral model, Mont. Wea. Rev., 120, 1433, 1992.
84. Navon, I.M., Practical and theoretical aspects of adjoint parameter
estimation and identifiability in meteorology and oceanography, Dynamics
of Atmospheres and Oceans, 27, (1-4), 55, 1998.
85. Palmn, E. and Newton, C.W., Atmospheric Circulation Systems, New York
Academic, 1967.
348
86. Parker, D., Learning logic, Working paper 47, Center for Computational
Research in Economics and Management Science, MIT, 1985.
87. Pu, Z.X., Kalnay, E., and Toth, Z., Application of the quasi-inverse linear
and adjoint NCEP global models to targeted observations during FASTEX.
12th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, 11-16 January 1998,
Phoenix, Arizona, 8-9, 1998.
88. Rabier, F., Courtier, P., and Talagrand, O., An application of adjoint models
to sensitivity analysis, Beitr. Phys. Atmosph., 65, 177, 1992.
89. Rabinovich, S.G., Measurement Errors and Uncertainties: Theory and
Practice, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
90. Ramanathan, V. et al., Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: Results from the
Earth Radiation Budget Experiment, Science, 243, 57, 1989.
91. Raval, A. and Ramanathan, V., Observational determination of the
greenhouse effect, Nature, 342, 758, 1989.
92. Redelsperger, J. L. and Guichard, F., Detailed analysis of cloud systems
observed during TOGA-COARE: Simulations forced & unforced by the
large scale motions. New insights and approaches to convective
parameterization. Proc. ECMWF Workshop, Reading, United Kingdom,
ECMWF, 58, 1996.
93. Ronen, Y., Uncertainty analysis based on sensitivity analysis, in Uncertainty
Analysis, Ronen, Y., Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1988.
94. Rosenwasser, E. and Yusupov, R., Sensitivity of Automatic Control Systems,
CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000.
95. Saltelli, A. et al., Sensitivity analysis of model output: An investigation of
new techniques, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 15, 211, 1993.
96. Saltelli, A. and Sobol, I.M., About the use of rank transformation in
sensitivity analysis of model output, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 50, 225, 1995.
97. Saltelli, A. et al., A quantitative, model independent method for global
sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics, 41, 39, 1999.
98. Sanchez, M.A. and Blower, S.M., Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the
basic reproductive rate. Tuberculosis as an example, Am. J. Epidemiol., 145,
1127, 1997.
99. Schlesinger, M. E. and Gates, W. L., The January and July performance of
the OSU two-level atmospheric general circulation model, J. Atmos. Sci., 37,
1914, 1980.
100. Schwarzkopf, M.D. and Fels, S.B., Improvements to the algorithm for
computing CO2 transmissivities and cooling rates, J. Geophys. Res., 90,
10541, 1985.
101. Schwarzkopf, M.D. and Fels, S.B., The simplified exchange method
revisited: An accurate, rapid method for computation of infrared cooling rate
and fluxes. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 9075, 1991.
102. Sepold, L. et al., Investigation of an overheated PWR-Type fuel rod
simulator bundle cooled down by steam; Part I: Experimental and
References
349
350