Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FEB 5
1958
5^^
Crown
XTbeoloatcal Xtbrar^
I.BABEL
Vol.
Vol.
By
Preacher.
R.
Wimmer.
Confessions
of
3s. 6d.
IV.LIBERAL CHRISTIANITY.
Vol.
3s.
and
v.WHAT
Vol.
Various Writers.
Vol. XIII
Vol.
6s.
Vol.
An
Anthropo-
Vol.
By
5s.
4s.
6s.
Vol.
Vol.
Dr.
4s. 6d.
Marti.
4s. 6d.
Lake.
5s.
men.
5s.
Vol.
EUCKEN.
5s.
Btm
Ce^tament ^tuDicis
III
BY
ADOLF HARNACK
PROFESSOR OF CHURCH HISTORY
UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN
IN
THE
TRANSLATED BY
THE
REV.
J.
R.
WILKINSON, M.A.
.
14
NEW YORK
G.
P.
PUTNAM'S SONS
1909
DEDICATED TO
PREFACE
The two
volumes
New Testament
of
studies
by
may
marked an epoch
third
volume,
presented
in
'
in
New Testament
The Acts
English
remarkable than
in
form,
the
if
is
The
Apostles,"
now
anything
In
predecessors.
its
of
research.
it
more
Professor
subjects the
from almost
all possible
points of view.
is
very
the high
esteem in which the author holds the researches of distinguished English scholars, such as Sir John Hawkins,
felt
been a companion of
great
German
Lukan
St. Paul,
scholar have
vil
To
it
was inconceivable
PREFACE
viii
shock.
And
now propounded by
one champion
among English
The
critical school.
many
troversy
translator calls to
ago
years
"CCC"mystic
signs
at
known
mind a
meeting
to the
of
con-
the
initiated
New
Tutor of
Acts
ii.
difficult
account of
companion of
Paul
St.
Tongues."
The
i.e.
translator
position as unscientific
to
him
his
own work
in
rendering these
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction
The
CHAPTER
I.
The
Exact statements
....
of years,
xiii
Chronological Data
II.
References to Festivals
IV. Indefinite dates
3
6
19
III.
22
Appendix
Appendix
III.
The
34
chronological note at the end of the
Acts
38
Appendix IV.
readings
Special
of
a chronological
CHAPTER
Terms
of
more general
...
significance
"Edvos, p. 49
p.
52;
65
'lovSatot, p.
BApfiapoi,
Xc6pa,
'H
Tiyos, p. 64.
p.
53;
55
vepixiijpos,
'la-pa-qX
and
'la-parjXiTai, p.
01 KaroiKovvTes,
JI6\ii,
44
II
31
'Kib/ir},
p.
Tdiros,
T^,
p.
56;
55
49
CONTENTS
PAOK
11.
Terms
of
more
special
significance
(The
list
of
Pisidia,
sion, p. 112.)
CHAPTER
III
117
CHAPTER IV
Miracles and Works of the Spirit (The Ascension)
133
CHAPTER V
The Sources and their Value
The
.162
CHAPTER VI
Instances op Inaccuracy and of Discrepancy
Written or oral sources ?
Instances of inaccuracy and discrepancy in the we-sections, p. 203 ; elsewhere in the second half of the
book, p. 205 ; in chapter i. and the source B (chaps,
ii.
v. 17-42), p.
(iii.
1-v. 16,
viii.
203
CONTENTS
xi
PAGK
5-40, ix. 31-xi. 18, xii. 1-23), p. 214. In the Jerusalem- Antiochean source (vi. 1-viii. 4, xi. 19-30, xii.
25 [xiii. l]-xv. 35), p. 219 in chap. ix. i-30, p. 224.
Instances of consistent inaccuracy and discrepancy, p. 225. Written or Oral sources ? Value
The we-sections, p 231. The second half of the
book, excluding the we-sections, p. 232. The
source B, p. 238. The source A, p. 241. The
Jerusalem- Antiochean source, p. 245. The Decree
of the council of Jerusalem, p. 248.
;
Excursus
I.
Survey
II.
On
Excursus
Community and
i.-xiv.),
264
the Acts
Excursus
III. St.
Excursus IV.
St.
Luke and
Christian joy
Luke and
Luke and
....
religion
Conclusion
277
Excursus V. The
275
281
date of the Acts
290
.
298
INTRODUCTION
The magnitude and
Luke
which
St.
task,
It
in its propagation,
tions
St.
Paul,
in personal rela-
Primitive
dis-
Community.
He had
xiU
INTRODUCTION
xiv
paradox.
the
of testimony, of narrative, and of speculation
that multitude of Spiritthe churches
apostles
gifted
ones
Wonders
experiencing
Above
down
INTRODUCTION
xv
wood
for
the trees.
formance
Even
is
What
so the per-
religious
move-
origin
or
Magna Mater ?
the task as
Had
to a certain extent
a biographer of
the apostle
in this
how
is it
knowledge
even con-
pended
himself.^
He
It follows
this
INTRODUCTION
xvi
loftiest heights
happy or successful.
Thus the new religion, even
either
immeasurable significance
It
yet
won
to the
Kerygma
Petri.
INTRODUCTION
traditional material,
xvii
and to regard
as their history
faute de mieuoc
not satisfy
all
his
Certainly not
it
Of
course
it
does
excellent
is
certain to
succeed.^
and
characteristic stories
less
Memorabilia
one can
important
or one can
:
TUP
Even
in early
diro(TTb\o}v
of Tertullian himself.
rejected only
xviii
INTRODUCTION
idea,
development.
What
has
St.
as fixed or as in
Luke done?
He
dis-
who came
Neither has he
after him.
On
this procedure.
its
for
at once the
however, this work was to be regarded as a continuation of the first work, this idea must be derived from
The power of
the active ministry of Jesus Himself.
in history
Apostles
in
the
manifested
the Spirit of Jesus
it
manifested in history"^
St.
Luke with an
is
absolutely narrow
INTRODUCTION
The
connotation.
xix
the word.
The
And
and
all
generally attached
still
of
St. Paul,
was to be described.
The Acts
of the
Apostles
is
absolutely supreme.
Paul
this
indeed
Biographical curiosity
it is
is
compelled to content
not fully
itself
with
satisfied,
little
or
INTRODUCTION
XX
later period
him a
worked
in Asia,
had
If he allows the
orbit
i.
while,
18, 1 Cor.
is
i.
of St.
at the
as
we
12, these
bound up
INTRODUCTION
spite of all that has
xxi
To
this
If
Again
ciple.
his
manifested
itself
The power of
most impressively
in
the Mission^
from
little
Galilee
Rome.
had
religion
throughout the
whole
empire, that
it
tion
could be
fact, therefore
This
subordinated to this theme.
of the Gospel could not
the expansion
"*"*
is
"
INTRODUCTION
xxii
in
fact,
anticipates
himself a digression.^
Rome,
in
scarcely forms
an exception
is
world
and
its
represented
rulers,
by the Roman
Rome"
is
St.
with
Paul.
the Gospel
these words
"And
is
"And
so
we
Ti]v*J*ct)juLijv fjXOajuiev,
all
the conclusion
conclusion
of
the defence
INTRODUCTION
Lord Jesus Christ with
all boldness,
xxiii
none forbidding
him."
But
than the
whom
bright side
is
the
had a dark
side which,
Jewish nation,
their
among
whom
the
origin,
way of
its
progress
among
Paul also
to bring the Jews to a better
mind, they nevertheless became only more and more
of St.
hostile.
But why.?
Is
it
it
over the
to the Greeks
Jews,
and the
turns
St.
and
its
Paul he
their
Gospel
the pre-
of God.
The
had indeed
INTRODUCTION
xxiv
Thus the
the new
it
was
called.
religion
fulfilment of the
Acts
" Be
known
it
God
salvation of
is
they will
also hear.""
The Jew
is
in
Apocalypse
Gospel of
John and
as in the
the
St.
who has
but the real Jew without generalisation and exaggeration in his manifold gradations of Pharisee, Sadducee,
aristocrat,
Where
St.
silence,
He
many Jewish
priests
and
among
the
so sacrifice truth
tells
us that very
Jewish colony in
Beroea
Paul with great goodwill, and that even among the Jews of Rome some
This impartiality of
were won over by the Apostle.
the narrative, in a point where there was such an
St.
is
a valuable
INTRODUCTION
xxv
ct jperdttionis ;
epoch, suffers
them
47 We dXrjdui 'laparjXelTtjs, iv
V 56Xos ovK iaTiv, x. 8 is to be confined to false Messiahs). The
third stage is marked by the Apologists, who, agreeing with St.
Luke and St. John in the theory of Israel's hardening, regard
ij
auTTipia
e/c
rdv
'lovdaloiv iarlv,
i.
'
absurd myths and lying invention. All these standpoints have their
roots in Paulinism, and their champions sought to establish them by
This fact is perhaps the
appealing to the teaching of St. Paul
strongest proof that St. Paul was a writer essentially incomprehensible to his age, however well he must have been understood
INTRODUCTION
xxvi
through
slow
of development that
process
that
ally
all
sixth
and the
lies
this
Practic-
fifteenth
chapters, thus
is
more than a
stration
The
longer
more am
St.
Luke the
not forced
his critics to treat him with more respect than they
show him. but not a few of them treat their own
conceits in regard to the book with more respect
than the grand lines of the work, which they either
I astonished that this fact has
or
criticise
from the
Yet
out of another generation of long ago, and passed over into another
generation far in the future. He was and he remained a Jew, and
yet he anticipated, with his doctrine of freedom bound by Faith
The great region lying
between these extreme points, with its gradual ascent, did not
His contemporaries, however, only knew this
exist for him.
region.
Like all natures of true genius, he lived in the past
and in the future.
INTRODUCTION
xxvii
that
How
movement,
Christian
the
is it
originally
Jewish, there arose a mission to the Gentiles ? "
nor
problem
to give
early
as a
it
it
who
has treated
it
And when
it
was proposed,
fallacious
explanation
the
expressly enjoined
xvi.) ?
this question,
St.
Luke has
raised
consideration a chief
its
tion.
had
in
is,
St.
Luke himself
make
it,
for
what
in the wide
world could
first
century
INTRODUCTION
xxviii
for
It has,
the manner in which he has answered it.
necessary
to
criticise
been
thought
of course, always
with especial rigour this aspect of St. Luke's narrative
and
have
also
positions which
sarily
set
themselves
upon
to
assail
historical
He
given.
has
ascribed
to the Gentiles
mission
the
beginnings
of
the
as
it
show that
St.
command
to baptize a
way
as to
draw therefrom
any
further
practical
for years
conclusion.
is
is given in the
not one that has been manu-
St.
of the
Hellenist
struction
of
the
who
first
among
the Samaritans
INTRODUCTION
xxix
them
community; of the college of Elders
at the head of the Church in Jerusalem who made
no protest when Christians from Jerusalem went to
distant Antioch and demanded that the Gentile
into a Christian
lastly,
And
the
less
so
seeing
that
he
has
confined
become no gaps
for us so
in
his narra-
soon as we realise
* Chapters xiii.
and xiv. are simply written to prepare for
chapter xv., and what they relate must b interpreted in the
light of that chapter.
INTRODUCTION
XXX
What
was
this
is
clear
was to show
how the power of the Spirit of Jesus in the Apostks
founded the Primitive Community^ called into being
from what we
mission
the
to
from Jemsalem
have
the
to
already said
Gentiles,
Rome, and
it
conducted
set
the
Gospel
world in the place of the Jeivish nation, which hardits heart more and more
against the appeal of
ened
Christianity.
From these main lines upon which the
work was planned, and which were abstracted in the
happiest way from the actual situation of events, St.
Luke
't
distinctly
I
po/i^zco- apologetic
We should,
bias.
The
dedication
historical literature.
INTRODUCTION
xxxi
With
of the author.
movement
first line
In this
case,
authorities
us in
tells
What
St.
Luke
this
and
if,
beginning
hostile behaviour
hostility
Whilst the
first
half of the
first
INTRODUCTION
xxxii
laid, the
first
its
him
in a dramatic suspense.
if
the
by
his
and by a
it
skill in
style
The
of such
vivacious
character
as
that
of the
first.
The
part.
The
first
INTRODUCTION
xxxiii
Bercea,
the narrative.
in
is
this
whether
now
interest
is
this
whether
St.
hindrance
Paul
Rome.
Hindrance follows
destiny
in
is fulfilled
this last
section
by yet another
St.
Luke perhaps
But
influenced
work must be
is
set
and legitimacy
must be
shown to have been legitimate (there are three narraThe Gospel was brought to the
tives of his call !)
Gentile world by no unworthy minister, but" by a
" vas electi07iis,''^
He was no destroyer of the Jewish
religion, but the most powerful and strenuous affirmer
grandeur,
i,e,
his
the reader scarcely notices St. Paul's second visits to these places.
INTRODUCTION
xxxiv
of
its
hopes
to
Caesar."
worthy of note
is laid upon his relationship to the
Jewish religion {rwt to Caesar), and this is a further
!
proof that
St.
Luke
still
for
ment
by
There
is
of the work
Why
is
it
Paul?
He must
surely have
known of
several
Christianity
Gospel he
is
satisfied
INTRODUCTION
only
describing
with
its
The
bounds
fulness
if
in
assumption
geographical
statistics.
true,
necessarily
is
scarcely
Silas,
it
regards
Paul
the
former
in
such
the
for the
persons
as
degree
on a
Twelve.
Men
Barnabas.
Stephen, Philip,
Priscilla
standing to a certain
felt
If
resulted
glorification of St.
part in
xxxv
as
with the
with Paul and
level
like
The
title
connotation, and
the
legitimised
If even
mission.
for
people
like
authority,
the
of
time
Antioch, but
St.
passing visit to
concerning
purpose
of
him
the
narration of the
foundation.
ministry
may
Paul's
also not
INTRODUCTION
xxxvi
Of
'Itjaovi iroielv
re kou
SiSatTKeiv), so
The
discourses.
and
in
second
and third
The
highest level,
of the
first
readers,
is
and xx.
but the speeches at the beginning of the work are
really fundamental in their Christology, and those
reached in the speeches of chapters xv.,
at
the
the
assure
close
missionary
Paul
St.
was
readers
the
xvii.,
that
divinely
their
great
appointed
During the
last
INTRODUCTION
divisions of the work,
gated
these
^just
it
remains to be investi-
divisions
sources.
and
xxxvii
In
are
not
Luke's
general St.
approaches that
of the
whether
from
translated
style
Septuagint,
Aramaic
very nearly
more particu-
more
of the people.
and
and
style, to the
fast,
in
vocabulary,
type of narrative.
The
style
becomes, so to say,
scene again
lies
for the
most part
in Palestine, the
INTRODUCTION
xxxviii
new movement
is
It
is,
how
work.
In
to
the stylistic
preserve
unity
of
his
The
from
all suspicion
style
and empty
rhetoric.
is
also
is
a comScarcely
He
is ever
concerned only with the root of the
matter in hand, he knows how to tell a very great
deal in a few words, and he never tries to bribe
his readers with tricks of oratory.
In respect of
style this
its
Read the
descriptions of
Athens,
in
of the shipwreck,
passage
And now
for
epistles
we
possess in the
That
we can
scarcely imagine a
more
INTRODUCTION
xxxix
Jerusalem, alone
last visit to
every one
still
of Jerusalem,
does.
And
it
authorship by
nesses as
in the
St.
Luke
inconceivable.
an historian seem to
first
place, in
me
to
credulity in
his
and of "
elsewhere
reference
to
and inaccuracy,
which
brevity
may
;
be
lastly, in
situations.
The
standards
the
first,
we must take
INTRODUCTION
xl
is
that class of
he that
is
Science "
is
to day
But only
concerned.
is
its
productions
kept himself
their
From
soon afterwards.
himself free.
We
fact
must
that
in
also
Paul
St.
this connection
(Col.
iv.
14)
remember the
St. Luke
calls
had therefore
tried
as
Luke he
is
impelled
If one
testimony.
Ramsay
enthusiast
who cured
diseases,
but of a
man who
and who
esteem of a
man
in
it
also
of cures in
them was
answer to
uncritical,
INTRODUCTION
that
in
fact
he
has
no
xli
knowledge
clear
of
what
And
the
lastly,
and inaccuracy
in
these
down and to
many instances
easily
discerned
to
critics
tear
as
scatter in
of
such
just
And
pieces.
inaccuracy,
because
yet
which
are
they are
to
serve
as
a base
for
far-reaching critical
operations.
a literary fiction
as
St.
numerous
description
given in the
first
chapters
is
scarcely
INTRODUCTION
xlii
much with
definite
most of
all,
and
lofty
contempt
possibility
of
ignorance,
wherein
powder to blow
In
first volume of
the
book
into
the
air.
whole
the
this series, entitled " Luke the Physician " (Crown
critical vagarities
less subjective
apologetic
In the
following pages
continue these
how
book
more assured
homogeneous, as
to its sources and its degree of trustworthiness, and
by this means to prove afresh the identity of the
author of the we "-sections with the author of the
In an age wherein critical hypotheses,
whole work.
once upon a time not unfruitful, have hardened
themselves into dogmas, and when if an attempt is
made to defend a book against prejudice, misunderstanding, and misrepresentation, scornful remarks are
made about "special pleading," it is not superfluous
judgment
as to
far the
is
INTRODUCTION
to declare that the
method which
xliii
is
here employed
is
influenced by no prepossession
is
necessary
of any kind.
It
CHAPTER
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA^
In the prologue to his twofold historical work St.
Luke has announced that he wishes to write down
This word, as well as the
everything " /caOe^^?."
to be understood here.
how
We
have not in
far St.
all
cases
In his gospel
it is
but in
His
form.
2
Throughout
this
we "-sections,
And yet
and connected investigation.
more accurate knowledge on this point is of interest
in two respects, both in relation to the question of
the trustworthiness of the work (or of the literary
conscientiousness of the author) and in relation to
thorough
the question of
In the
its
unity.
the book
first place,
chronological framework.
disappointing in so
is
no trace of a connected
The
construction of such
to a
man
it
as
not
in
of
He
com-
this
sense.
In
this
attitude
he,
intended to give
1
And
life
to the narrative,
i.e.
to the
narra-
in connection, in clearness,
and exactitude.
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
of pai'ticular
tive
He
events.
sents
in
their
correct
order
his
desire
But
him
is
in
for this
framework for
his
wherein
he
them
in connection
I.
As concerns
few
references
the
to
past,-^
and
to
person-
Our Lord executed under Pilate and Herod Antipas (iv. 27,
Theudas (v. 36)
in the days of " the enrolment " (v. 37)
Judas the Galilaean (v. 37) the " Egyptian " (xxi. 38). Here let
it be noted by the way that St. Luke gives us certain information, nowhere else recorded, concerning the relationship of Herod
Antipas and his court to Christ and the new religion. He expressly refers to this Herod when giving the date of the public
appearance of our Lord (St. Luke iii. 1) he records (viii. 3) that
among the women who followed our Lord was to be found one
Joanna, the wife of a steward of Herod (c/. xxiv. 10), and (Acts
1
&c.)
xiii. 1)
that
of Antioch
"
Community
4
ages
known
or could easily be
I.
(the
name
Herod tempts
of
with
the
people
Blastus the
is
Herod himself
(in
order to
in the
path of
(xxiii.7/.).
1 Gamaliel
(v.
xxii. 3)
the chief priests Annas and
34
Caiaphas, and John (Jonathan) and Alexander (iv. 6) the highpriest Ananias (xxiii. 2; xxiv. 1/.); the procurator Felix (xxiii. 6,
&c.) Drusilla the wife of Felix (xxiv. 24)
the procurator Festus
(xxiv. 27, &c.)
the king Agrippa II. and Bernice (xxv. 13, &c.).
In mentioning the Ethiopian queen Candace, St. Luke does not
give us an indirect chronological reference, seeing that at that
time and afterwards all the Ethiopian queens were called by that
;
name.
'
Kar'
Uuvov Tbv
Kaipbv.
it
as referring to
is
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
the youthful Church.
the other can
logical interest
As
we therefore
Claudius
and
his
is
When
sole
directly chronological
St.
TrdvTag rov^
(xviii. 2).^
Here again
'lovSaiovg
airo
t??
this information is
^Vcojurjg
not given
That
and records
St.
it,
edict of Claudius,
of information
mention
is
made
of a
few
Cyprus
Corinth
(xiii.
(xviii.
7),
12
/*.).
there
In both cases (here and xi. 28) St. Luke has omitted all titles,
gives only the name of the emperor. Even in this point the
consistency of his style is remarkable. Orosius gives the date of
the edict of Claudius. We do not know where he got his information there is, however, no reason for doubting its accuracy.
1
and
It cannot therefore be
shown that
St.
Luke was
Such a passage as
logical sitimtion
scientifically
in the Acts
found nowhere
is
of
determined,
is
Apostles.
the
be
to
More-
II.
Dates
xi. 26.
of years
following passages
St.
the
in
-^
{eviavTOv oKov)
Church).
xvii. 2.
On
(eiri
ard^/Sara rpla)
six
months
{eviavrov kol
Areopagite
the
the
Kal
Dike
God in Athens
the
35)
(xxviii. 4)
(xvii. 23).
Each trait is correct
the Unknown
and true to its situation.
^ Passages wherein the years of duration of disease are given
Vide iv. 22 and ix. 33.
are left out of consideration.
11)
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
xix. 8.
three
there,
St.
Paul on his
months (eTr^
and then
xix. 10.
visit to
/>i?m?
rpek) in
errj
Svo) in
These two
31.
as
{rpieTiav).
XX.
3.
St.
Paul
made a second
of
stay
three
Greece (Corinth).
[xxiv. 10. Felix at the time that St. Paul first
appeared before him had been procurator in Judaea
months
for
(TrofTJo-a?
many
years
/uirjvag
(e/c
rpei^) in
iroWiJcv eroov).]
ircov TrXeiovcov),
to Jerusalem,
bringing alms.]
xxiv. 27. After
reckoned from
two years
St.
Paul's
(Sierlag
first
'K\t]pooQeicrt]<i)
hearing
Felix was
replaced by Festus.^
Wellhausen {Nachr.
Jan. 1907,
" Ateri'a
s.
the apostolic ministry of St. Paul, lasting more than two years, he
should only have been able to tell us of the progress of the trial
of the Apostle. The hypothesis of a cessation of two years in the
consecutive and consistent course of the trial, which naturally and
necessarily forms the proper subject of the narrative,
is
all
however
hang on
It is just as
Paul
St.
left
xxviii. 30.
St.
Paul abode in
We
(imeTa rpeig
juLrjvag)
Rome two
full
years
3.
i.
(Si
months
rjjuLepcov
[ix. 9.
Saul was blind for three days (^fxepag
rpeh) after Christ had appeared to him.]
X. 30. Cornelius had the vision three days (aTro
rerapTrjq rmxepag) before St. Peter's visit to him.
Seven days
6.
{rjixepa^
irevre)
we
we abode
in
^/mepcov
eTrra)
Troas.
probably allowed themselves to be led away by the toXXo, irt] of
As if St. Luke in his discourses cared for historical
xxiv. 10.
exactitude and not rather for anything that suited his purpose
He constantly contradicts himself even when his speakers give
I
of A.D. 55."
interpretation
held
office.
(2)
uifiiXei
avT(^
vvKvbTepov
form an excellent
intro-
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
Seven days
xxi. 4.
eTrra)
(ijjuiepag
we abode
in
Tyre.^
xxi.
One
7.
day
(rjjmepav
filav)
we
abode
in
Ptoleraais.
xxiv.
After
1.
five
days
(juLeTa
St.
^/mepag),
irevre
Paul to Caesarea,
came thither.
There are not more than twelve days (ou
elcTLV
jmoi
came to Jerusalem.
XXV. 1. Three days after his entry into office {jueTa
Tpeh ^jULcpa^) Festus came to Jerusalem.
XXV. 6. After not more than eight to ten days
I
rj
to Caesarea.
XXVii. 27.
KCLTrj
The
upon
this point
previously.
and
It is
there can
be no doubt
sarily
10
XXViii. 7.
(rpeig ^/mepag)
we abode
at Syracuse.
sailed
Puteoli.
XXViii. 14,
(^/mepag e-Trra)
we abode
We add
mentioned
X.
lastly the
23
X. 24
xiv. 20
X.
XX. 7
xxi.
xxii.
xxiii.
30
32
7)
i'iravpLOv{r]/x^pa)
XXV. 6
XXV. 23
iv.
iv.
3
5
[xxiii. lu]
7}
7]
i-jnoiari (also
20
XXV. 23
xxiii.
[vii.
2G]
xvi.ll
XX. 15
xxi. 18
xxiii. 11
with
ijfxipa
or p6^)
is
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
11
XX. 15
xxvii.
XX. 15
xxi. 26
...
.
uncertain]
xi. 1
^^*
XV 17
IR
xxvii.'
'ii.'is
From
clusions
-I
Reading
[xiii. 44.
.
'
'
.
*
.
'
'
*
:
these
xiii.
44
.J
.1
*
...
'^
^
L
y
'f
:j
lists
^^'^^ w^poL
^^'J'
^^
(in
xxvii. 18 followed
by
77x^^77,)
^^^^
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
12
With these
of
Paul in definite
St.
we can
use.
connected the
five
is
we abode
seven days
a question
in
Jeru-
salem
St. Paul's
last visit to
abode
Puteoli (brethren
seven days we
were found in
all
ten
in
these places).
But of these
ten, one
given in months
the duration
is
within
this
where
vide supra),
in
and
the
at various places.^
it
made from
According
Philippi after
his journey.
The
We
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
13
journey from
Philippi
to
We
sum
3.
indefinite.
logical
statements there
still
remains
two smaller
these are
insignificant
and
14
The
and
in Caesarea (xxi.
26
xxvi. 32).
Lord allowed
its
this
passage
is
dependent upon
Messianic
legend,
St.
1
sacred
ness).
number {cf. the forty days " of temptation in the wilderOne only wonders that the period was not extended to
*'
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
As we now
survey
all
15
chronological state-
these
tion.
is
and
in Caesarea
but (1)
it is
Luke
If St.
of
Luke
which
then for
this
period
As
is
to
me
probable
artificial stylistic
**
we
Acts
purpose.
2
Except that
St.
of Festus.
This naturally does not cover the trustworthiness of the diswhich are especially numerous in this section of the work,
and of several other details.
^
courses,
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
16
of St.
Lukewe
inadequately, control
So
of St. Paul.^
its
far,
of the
author's
all
partnership with
St.
Paul in the
In the
months
dates.
elsewhere
i.e.
in
the
whole
first
half of
he
What
the book
Still less
in the "
that St. Paul must have stayed in the capital of Macedonia for a
longer time than is recorded in the Acts of the Apostles. But even
let
Elsewhere it is only in the " we "-account (the story of the shipwreck) that mention is made of the fourteenth night and midnight
{xxvii. 27, Kara iiiaov t^s vvKrbs:), and that we are told concerning
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
But now
this condition
it
of things
follows that
From
no manufactured dates
17
Palestine
is
Com-
earliest period
of
practically destitute of
chronological plain,
St. Paul's sermon in Troas that it lasted fi^xP'^ jJ-ea-ovvKriov (xx. 7),
indeed even axpt avyrji (xx. 11). In xxviii. 23 we are informed that
the meeting in Rome in which St. Paul delivered his apology before
the Jews lasted dirb -rrput Iws iairipas; in xxii. 6 and xxvi. 13 it is
recorded that St. Paul saw the vision of Christ irepl ixearjfjifiptav and
and
"nfJt^pai fiiarjs respectively (this detail does not occur in ix. 3)
in iv. 3 we hear that the imprisonment of the Apostles took place in
the evening ; lastly, in v. 21, that the Apostles when set free entered
into the Temple vir6 tov 6p6pov both statements almost necessarily
follow from the context. As for the hours, icpa is used pleonastically,
or at least not in a strictly technical sense, in x. 80 (/i^xpt ra^jTrjs t^s
w/)as), xvi. 18 (ayrij ry iopg.), xvi. 33 {iv Udv-Q tt} Cbpq.), and xxii. 13
Signifying hour of prayer, &pa occurs in iii. 1 {^ttI
(aimj Ty iapq).
;
T. (bpav T.
r]/j.^pas
Otherwise only
wpav t'/cT?;^).
in four places, namely, ii. 15 (the Pentecostal miracle happened at
the third hour of the day this is expressly recorded in order to
refute the calumnious charge that the Apostles were intoxicated),
v. 7 (Sapphira's act of deceit and her sudden death followed three
hours after that of her husband), xix. 34 (the Ephesians cried out,
These
iirl ibpas Uo), and xxiii. 23 (this passage is given above).
and
ivoLTriv
respectively),
and
x. 9 [irepl
accounts certainly are not all of them quite trustworthy yet there
is in them no trace of systematic tendency, nor, where they have
something of the conventional about them, do they go beyond the
literary expedients of which the best historical writers of antiquity
availed themselves.
^ The fact that this notice is unique in the first half of the book
suggests that the account of the mission in Antioch, in regard to
its source, either belongs to the accounts of the second half or is
;
not inferior to
them
in value.
18
mid
actual date
it is
most
first
difficult
order
one for
their
to discover the
In regard to the
of each occurrence.
chronological
period in
may, indeed
instance
(if
manner recorded
in
it
took place at
the Acts)
fell
all
and
within the
in the
first
forty days
whether the
1 This notice aCFords us the best datum for the absolute chronology of the first half of the Apostolic epoch. The persecution of
the Apostles by Herod Agrippa (king of Judea a.d. 41-44), which
was shortly followed by the death of the king, took place not long
before the year a.d. 44, the year of Herod's death. At that time
the Apostles left Jerusalem. Now a very ancient tradition (see my
Chronologic,
laid
the
*
ff.
is
In
V.
persecution.
lies
a gross chronological
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
journey of
St.
Paul to Jerusalem
But even
(xi.
19
is
more that
is
is
if in
these cases
there
is
final verdict
and to investigate
refers to Festivals^
his chronological
From
it
is
the
of high position,^
it
by a Greek
for another
Greek
that
first
half of the Acts, and are not absent even from the
" we-sections."
^
We
is
are
therefore led
to conclude
That this Greek noble bore the name of Theophilus from his
birth is possible, but not probable.
Either St. Luke in the address
*
has given to him a lofty spiritual title side by side with his high
worldly title " /cpcirtcrToj," or he himself as a Christian had taken
the name '* Theophilus," just as a few decades later the Christian
Ignatius took the name " Theophorus."
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
20
that St.
Christianity,
work and
whom
he addressed his
This tends to
in the
i.
XX.
roov
Distance
journey
day'^s
standard
is
7.
is
"" ;
therefore presupposed.
The
named by
is
called
vj
fila
reference to the
it is
^ ^jmepa r^? irevraKoa-Trj^!
known at what time the feast
it is
fell.^
We
the Acts think otherwise, seeing especially that the *' we "-account
gives the same tradition (xvi. 13).
3 The wording of ii. 1 is, moreover, of such a character that there
is room for doubt whether the author intended to say that the
pouring forth of the Spirit occurred on the day of Pentecost itself.
It is more natural to suppose that it occurred shortly before this
day. The matter is perhaps purposely left indefinite.
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
3 and XX.
21
and
not
therefore assumed to be generally known,
xii.
6.
^/mepai
^crav
and is
when these days fall.
xii. 4. Herod intended
said,
tcop
al^v/uLcov
twv oQixwy
it
is
is
thus known.
XXVii. 9. ovTO<s
Trjv vrjcTTelav
Day
of
rj^t]
rjSr]
7r iccj^aXov^
irapeKrjKvQevai
Atonement
is
meant
is
readers
slice
(rou ayvKTimov)
this
fii'st
of Judaism.
the
kind lasted
seven days.^
ii.
alone can
is
it
is
made
this
chronological
ivoypa^rji)
ijfiipas re
22
his
style
Biblical
We
character.
shall at
once
i.
Ye
5.
shall
TToXXa?
juLCTCL
^jULcpa^
15.
in the days
between
proposed
the
completion
of the
number of the
Apostles.
V. 36.
TTpo TOVTcov
Twv
^jiiepoov
Theudas
vi. 1.
v rati rj^epai^
more
closely defined
(quite indefinite in
meaning
" before
rose up.
Tavrai^
= at
that time;
it
twv /maOyjrwv)
arose a dispute between the Hebrews and the Hellenists in the Primitive Community.^
is
by
2 Cf,
voiTjaay.
St.
vii.
TrXrjOvvovrcov
"rj/jiipa " in
41
a concordance.
dpXO-ios fxadrjTTjs.
16)
is
called
an
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
viii.
{i.e.
probably for
Paul, after
St.
his
23
many
years)
sorceries in Samaria.
conversion,
continued
began at once
ix. 23.
cog
been years)
the Jews of
may have
As
iKavds,
24
xiii.
31.
Resurrection
i.e.
after
His
forty days.
xiv. 3.
worked
and ix.
^/mepa^ TrXe/ou?,
eTrl
in
43).
intended).
is
XV.
Silas in
XP^^^^ (quite
Antioch.
TLavXog
K.
33.
Judas and
XV. 35.
TTOiiia-avTe^
BapvalSag Sicrpi^ov
i.e.
indefinite)
ev ^A^vrio^ela
xii. 19).
The
xvi. 18.
TToXXa?
possessed
woman
cried after us
iiri
r}ij.epa<s.
xviii. 1.
St.
to Corinth.
After the
xviii. 18.
tjfjiepag
43
^
trial
St.
viii.
Weiss
11
tries to
xiv. 3).
show that
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
xviii. 23.
Tiva
St.
TTOiria-a's
25
St.
departure
settled,
broke
riot
out.
We
xxi. 10.
XXi. 15.
stay in Caesarea)
xxi. 38.
St.
Egyptian who
rose
up
we
Paul
is
(vide y. 36),
rj/uLcpcov
xxiv. 24.
19;
x.
48;
xv. 36;
xvi.
12),
Felix
him concerning
XXV. 13.
Christ.
rjjULepcov
Se
SiayevojULevcov
24),
XXVii. 7.
arrived
xxvii. 20.
rnuepa^ TrXe/ouj.
Crete
(probably
we
several
jmeT
TrXelovag ^jULepa?.
[XXViii. 6.
^
xxiv.
43 xviii. 18).
Uavov Se y^povov Siayevo/mevov, we loosed
at
difficulty
ix. 23,
XXVii, 9.
eirl
{cf.
with
weeks, vide
tivcov
Caesarea.
This
iir\iipw6-q
is
cttI
ttoXv,
preceded in xix.
by the quite
indefinite
u>s
5i
26
would
down dead
fall
being
after
bitten
by the
snake.^]
an important point in
author of the weaccount with the author of the whole work, that
indefinite chronological notices are of no rarer occurrence in the we-account than in the rest of the work,
This circumstance
nor are they different in form.
In
the
place,
first
favour of the
it
is
of the
identity
be considered in Appendix
will
I.
Next we must
time
is
not defined
those where
it
is
the
seems at
sight strange.
first
Of
the
i.
36;
V.
xviii.
viii.
38
xxi.
11;
ix.
xxvli.
37;
31;
xiii.
7, 9, 14,
20
xvi. 18;
xxviii. 6
in
we may not
of the author.
Philippi and
only given
had wished
^
rbTe is
in
Caesarea
indefinitely,
it
significance
in
the
strict
is
we "-sections).
the "
it
sense
of
the
word.
Acts
In
is
xvii.
14,
a genitive
iiriyvcj/xev).
it
favourite
X.
16
xxi. 30
xxii. 29.
have
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
Why
afforded us more accurate dates.
be noticed
Philippi
he
he has
It should,
how-
uses
expression
and again
rtvd?,
rumepag
27
in
rjixepa^
(XXVii. 7, 9)
in the we-account
If we
(Uavov ^(^povov)}
find the same distinctions in statements of time also
made outside the we-account, we may assume with a
he speaks of iKavcu
^/mepai
but
account
rest
t]/j.pag
Damascus
rivag after
his
of his activity
'iKavbi in chronological
ment only
in the
Lukan
New
Testa-
is
always to be
(viii.
7, 9),
11;
ix,
23;
28
(xv.
36 and
respectively,
xviii.
the
first
^jmepcj^i/
appearance of
St.
izXelov^ ijjmepag
in face of all
several cases
CHRONOLOGICAL DATA
This supposition also
approximate.^
and
xix.
may
29
be extended
2123
for the
made only a
which
is
lonians
it clear
this
a fact
city,
and
makes
likewise there
Naturally in a
number
may
of these instances he
it
also have
necessary
it.
rjfjLepQv
TeaaapaKovra
(i. 3).
Also in
i.
and
in
ii.
is
given.
we read
/xeTOL
woXKas Tavrai
ijfjL^pas,
30
That
desired
historical
point of chronology
in
is
leaves
much
to be
statement; but
if,
leaves
much
data (though here also the chief stations are carefully given), this circumstance
is
of his work.
the book
is
is
of a conventional type
in
reality,
but as a whole
it is,
both
APPENDIX
Tlie Consistency
in
we
the Acts,
do best to
and to
shall
XX.
7, XXi.
8.
eiravpiov
Til
[rjinepa]
(eight
times
XX. 25.
XXi.
XXVii. 18. r^
6,
XVi. 12.
e^;]? [^fxepa]
r]ij.ipa<5
book).
XXVii. 7. ^juepag
Uams
(three
times elsewhere in
the book).
XXVii. 20.
7r\
eVl ^fxepag
TrXe/of?).
xxi. 10.
>jjupag irXeiovg
ov TrXe/ou? ^juepai
XXVii. 14
XVl. 18.
TavTa^
i^',
iroWag
xxi v. 11:
^jmepa^ ov TrXe/ou?
20
^juepag
(i.
eirl
tj,
cf.
irXelova -^povov),
ov jmeTO. TroXXa?
^juepa?)'
(elsewhere xxv. 4
xxv. 6
12,
14.
eTrifxelvai
^]juLepa9
{vide
32
XVi. 12
XX.
6.
^jmepcov
Siayevo/uLei'cav).
viii.
11
iKavw "xpovw,
iKavbv -^povovy
c.
ace.
c.
in the book).
xvi. 13.
XX.
6.
^ ^jmepa
at r/jmepai
XX. 16. ^
XXi. 16.
Mnason
is
an
(vide
ii.
14).
1).
the recep-
XX.
7.
XXi. 13.
sections
And
three times
elsewhere
in
the we-
in the book).
xxvii. 22. ra wv (also iv. 29, v. 38, xvii. 30, xx. 32).
*Qg temp, eight times in the we-sections (twenty-one
APPENDIX
33
found again
of the
with the exception only of rri erepa scil. ^juepa
(XX. 15, XXVii. 3), axpi avy^? (XX. 11) and SevTepaioi
book
rence
not to be found
the
in
we-sections can
be
One
to
23),
(xv. 33,
y^povov
iroiria-a^
xiii.
23), to
xviii.
18), to SicTia
rpierla (xxiv.
23)
s.
and
of in-
Neue
(e^avTtj^
and
irapay^prjixa
comparison
i^ijs
viii.
ace. temp.
rC}v
27
x.
apxo-'^<^v
42
yet vide
ii.
36
c.
t-q
Uapoi
xx. 9 xp^^oi
31 Kara
33
xiii.
exofJ-^vr}
(iv.
25)
11
ix.
x.
35
xviii.
13
/ler'
admit of
37 t^ [t^]
vii.
4 iwl
c.
19 irpocp-qTrj^
ov TroWds Tj/j-ipas
ix. 8,
Tjiiepav
yiv<xdai
;
i.
34
We
may
difference between
is
absolutely no
employed
in the
procedure
is
from
dis-
whole work.
procedure
pieced
in
the
so far as
regard
them together
chronology
to
unskilfully
he
has
his
not
APPENDIX
II
The
from
mation
From the gospel he knew that our Lord
was born under Augustus, that He entered upon His
:
public
ministry in
the
fifteenth
year of Tiberius
dation of the
first
APPENDIX
35
II
tinguished
from
the
persecution
of the
Christian
under Herod
Agrippa.
Since the latter reigned from a.d. 41 to
A.D. 44 it would be obvious that all which is recorded
in the first twelve chapters of the Acts belonged to
a period of eleven to thirteen (fourteen) years, and
Hellenists
accordingly
the reign
in
occupied
the
last
years
of
first
Tiberius,
years of
Claudius.
On
still
xviii.
41(44)-54.
office
of three
time
and
is
we can
that
it
was Nero to
whom
St.
36
was
sent,^
and that
his transport to
first
half of the
Annas and
before Caiaphas.
Roman
If he were acquainted
rule in the provinces
was
proconsul in
Rome
Christian of
year
Jews.
find
*
If he were a Jewish
he could easily ascertain in what
Corinth.
much
Can
it
in
would
we
xxvL
where Nero
is
meant
Kalaap; and in xxv. 21, 25, 6 le^aarbs. On the contrary, Claudius is mentioned simply by name without any title {vide
supra).
Moreover, St. Luke never calls the emperor 6 /SacriXei/s, as
was the custom with so many orientals (so also 1 Timothy, 1 Peter,
and the Apocalypse, but not St. Paul). Only the Jews in Thessalonica who accuse St. Paul and the Christians before the judgmentseat are allowed to say that these people act contrary to the decrees
of Caesar, /SacriX^a 'irepov X^yovres eXvai 'Irjaovv.
It is even possible to
deduce an important inference as to the date of the Acts from the
author's reluctance to use the title, seeing that 6 ^aaiXevs as a title
for the emperor very quickly established itself in the East, indeed
completely since the time of Domitiaa.
find only 6
APPENDIX
37
II
him to a
we only refrain
from criticising the book according to our modern
standards, we find that it satisfies even more exacting
requirements in relation to chronology, and that when
Paul in Ephesus that would direct
St.
Indeed,
it
if
it
proves
himself exceedingly
following point.
The
narratives of chaps, i. v.
and
and
is
in correct order,
in
author follows
many
But
lines at
once.
In the
first
he again
treats it
1
falls
out of line.
38
left
The
is
essentially trustworthy
forms a pro-
we
APPENDIX
Tlie Chronological
The most
book
is
[sell,
in
the
Rome]
OLTreSe-^eTO
auToV,
difficult
Note at
III
^e
SicTiav oXtjv
TrdvTas
Ktjpvara-ODV
evifxeivev
Ttjv
APPENDIX
SlSdcTKCOV
TO.
ircpl
39
III
ToO KVplOU
'It](TOU
^OKTTOV
dKoyXvTco^.
of this
oXov
KOi
Tovg KaroiKovvTa^
Kvplov
(xix. 10)
lastly
commanded
KCoXveiv Tcov
27, 23).
iSlcov
avTOv
the centurion
strange
namely,
We
first
sight so
St.
Paul in
Rome
is
not
is
40
The
(vide supra).
by no means
lies
difficulty of
in the
And
this fact
is
statement
itself,
book breaks
doubly strange
but simply
firstly, in
that the
and secondly, in
that in breaking off, he at the very same moment hints
that the history of St. Paul had a further continuation;
for Blass and other scholars are justified in deciding
author breaks
that
the
aorist
ive/ueivev,
Rome
meant
tive is
ment
death
is
it
not recorded
is
if,
and
difficult
led to the
to see
however,
it
why
lasted
We
Home.
this the
that
the Apostle
again
left
and
Rome; ^
most probable
Paul
is
APPENDIX
the whole book (and
is
41
III
incredible in itself)
and the
in
now been
hired lodging at
The problem,
Why
this
is
it
who
form
St.
Paul in
such detail, has not proceeded further with his narrative of the history of the Apostle,
two
years'*
residence in
Rome
first
said.
In spite of
way
in which,
42
The
the book.
OTi TOig eOvetriv aire(TTaXrj TOVTO TO (TCOTijpiov Tov Ocov' avTol Kal
aKova-ovraifhas been before expressly, even if not so
loudly, declared in various passages of the work (from
vide xviii. 6, &c.).
xiii. 46 onwards
Certainly from
vi. Iff. onwards it forms the leading thought in the
whole economy of the book while even earlier it
probably lies at the background of the great list of
v/uliv
nations in chap.
ii.
Now
to the Gentiles
^
Vide
e.g.
others
only with
APPENDIX
43
III
Luke intended
my
it
The
difficult.
in
is
is
little
to
commend
i.
it,
be-
all likelihood,
to narrate in
it
this
if
not the
But coming
St.
Luke
off the
ministry in
We
the book
cannot indeed imagine
years' ministry
had immedi-
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
44
If
unintelligible.
APPENDIX
IV
The
polations
chronological in character
1.
ii.
1.
(Tv/ULTrXtjpoua-Oai
(instead of koi ev
tw
cru/XTrX.),
by
this
now probably
interpolation
translate,
" It
for
we may
happened
in
i.e.
the fulfilment
is
no longer to
an imitation.
APPENDIX
2.
Dp
1.
iii.
'Ei/
IV
45
rah
(Se)
ravraig
^/mepaif
not received
was
It
iii.
1.
to
SeiXimi/, received
ii.
in1).
/5-recension ;
a descriptive interpolation.
4.
V. 1.
iv
of simply
avTw
Egp
ix. 40.
avrjp Si Tf?),
;
vide
1,
ii.
Ps-August(sah)
iii.
^ Se
1.
Trapa^pwa
by Blass.
Concerning Trapa^m^jua
Luke, vide supra and xxii. 29.
/3-recension
in St.
Dspw
6. xi. 2.
o fxev ovv
Uirpog
Sia
Uavov yjpovov
an inter-
For
sion.
iKavog xp6vo<s
43
XXVii. 7
7.
xiv. 2.
vide
(^jul. Ik.),
xxvii. 9.
(lk. ^juL,),
Dsgpw (E)
viii.
11, ix.
23
Feeble imitation.
^e Kvpiog
eSwKev
Ta-)^v
8.
xiv. 20.
f sah
avaarrdg), accepted
imitation, vide
9.
XVi. 11.
DMs
by Blass
place of
probably due to
iv. 3.
tJ5
of
evOecog in verse
accepted by Blass.
10.
xvii. 19.
DMs
/ulcto,
of
Se
^/mipag
rivdg
7riXa/8o/xej/oi),
eTrtXa-
interpola-
46
due to reflection
due to imitation.
tion
11.
DfMs
19.
xviii.
sah
due to
reflection
accepted by Blass
tw
craPparu)
eirtovTi
of elcreXOwv)
interpolation
accepted by Blass
due to
imitation.
12. xviii. 21.
DHLPSyrigwallat.:
(ef7rej/)-^er/>ie
eh
cral3^aT(i).
13.
Dsgw
xix. 9.
TrefMTrrtjg
r.
ev
(^SioXeyojiievog
<j^o\i]
perhaps
XX. 18.
D^
o)?
Tpieriav
tj
xxi. 5.
rrj
Se
e^tjg
rj
kol irXecov.
vi^epa,
eyevero e^aprlcrai
the
^juag
and unsuitable
careless
constant
(in
occurrence
by
received
place of ore
rag
^/mepag)
of the
due
to
phrase
in
correction,
the context.
16. xxi. 15.
jULeTOL
evidently
secondary
eTTicTKeva-
reading;
APPENDIX
IV
47
Due
ceived
ficant
Til eiTLova-ri
r^
(for
eyofxivrj), re-
D (g sch)
^juepa? (for
insignificant variant
insigni-
tog
a-uvreXeicrOai), received
recension
j8-
due to imi-
Acts.
19. xxii. 29.
Ms
sah
received
ix. 40.
20. XXVii. 1.
fgs
Til 7ravpiov,
received
really part of
by Blass
a more
extensive interpolation.
21. XXVii. 5.
KOI
juLeTOL
of a more
extensive interpolation.
Msf
22. XXVii. 5.
Si'
To
original.
to one another,
sion,
is
numbers
may perhaps
;
4, 5,
The
readings,
a second group
13
pure
is
formed by
a third group by
19 stand in isolation.
The
The numbers
48
has
App.
vi.
30
insert
^/mepag
rea-crapaKovra
in
We
accordance with
i.
3.
supra).
It is improbable
that St. Luke himself formally published the Acts of the Apostles (so also
Ewald,
many
cf.
Wellhausen, he.
instances
of
cit.
roughness
s.
19/);
suggest
for
the
;
(1)
absence
(2)
the
The very
fact that
made
it
themselves.
One does
a single passage
in
not, however, in
revising
matters of
this
to establish
in place.
Luke
iii.
1, 2)
CHAPTER
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES,
II
AND HOUSES
I.
("E(9i/os
Significance.
i.e.
26
TTCti/
xiii.
19, &c.
eOvt]
(xiii.
iOvcov, xxi.
25
Gentile Christians."
It
is
15
VI wv
Te ^la-pmjX), xiv. 5
xxi.
21 (Toy? Kara
(e^aipovjuevog
ere e/c
= " the
iv.
27 (cvv
(eviJowiov eOvoov
(opjULrj
its
eOvecriv koi
re koi
/SacriXecov
tov Xaov
[i.e.
17
23 (KarayyeWetp tw re Xaw
word is not yet
absolutely secularised
in x. 22 we read that the
Gentile centurion Cornelius was held in good repute
Kai K Twi/ iOvcov), xxvi.
KOI Toig eOvecriv).
Nevertheless, the
:
;;
50
VTTO
Tcov 'lovSaiwp,
St.
Paul speaks
as eOpoi
/JLov,
as well as St.
call
(xxiv. 3)
No
style.
difference can
be distinguished between
diff'erent
Aaos (about forty-eigrht times, includingr twentyfour times in the first seven chapters).
*0 \a6^
is,
28
TOV
vojuLOv K.
Often
of an exalted character
epithet 'la-pariK
LXX]
Tcov 'lovSaicov.
especially
SiSd(TKcov, xxviii.
after the
(cf.
xiii.
Not
10;
(iv.
but
it
iv.
17, 24)
k.
17)
definite
only in discourse
infrequently
it
partakes of the
meaning of our phrase " all the people " (in a city,
TO TrXrjOoi tov Xaov) or of the people in
cf. xxi. 36
v. 13)
distinction from their leaders (e.g. iv. 17, 21
Only in a
or of a collection of people (e.g. v. 37).
quotation from the Old Testament Xaoi = eOvtj (iv.
:
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES,
25).
and
AND HOUSES
51
eOvrj,
this use.
No
distinction can be
different
of
TO. eOvrj
and
is
accidental.
Its
In his use
The
o Xao^
called
is
a strong
antiquity.
is
met with
is
frequently
By
its
(it
is
not, however,
till
is
52
again
xi.
to the Hellenes in
(T/36jixepoi"'EiX\t]vg in
Thessalonica,
and
is
28
(St.
Paul
St.
Luke
i.e.
the proselytes),
proved that
uses the
word only
in reference
from others. We
find once 'KWrjviSeg yvvaiKcg (xvii. 12 in Beroea of
Macedonia), once 'KWrjvicrri (xxi. 37 ^), and twice
(vi. 1 and ix. 29) 'KXXrjvia-rai, only Jews of the
Diaspora dwelling in Jerusalem and speaking Greek
are so called (antithesis
ol 'K/Spaioi), and are still
The
so called after they have become Christians.
word is not found elsewhere in the New Testament, and is altogether very rare.
By the expression
'lovSaioi re Koi. "KWrjveg St. Luke is characterised as
to particular regions and excludes
it
*EPpaioi (once).
Luke again
St.
coincides with
St.
Paul in his
it.
St. Paul, as
is
well
Diaspora)
similarly 'K^paioi
is
used
Every
a Hebrew.
In
Elsewhere only in
In
xviii. 7
xi.
20
St.
John
is
of doubtful authority.
xix. 20.
{vide aupra).
(vide Heinrici
53
Three times
in
'K^patSi SiaXeKTO) (xxi. 40 xxii. 2 xxvi. 14 ; nowhere else in the New Testament).
This can only
;
Hebrew
'lovSatoi
While
I.
s.
5,
18).
'lovSaioi
found in the
is
three
synoptic
Luke),
occurs in
it
St.
And
The
of the gospel.
by
10
(ii.
xvii. 17)
and
(3) pleon-
vojulo^ * (xiii.
'lovSaio^,
xiii.
yl/evSoirpocbriTrjg,
xvi.
xxiv.
24
fore preferred,
was
'lovdacoi.
Sia\iKT(f Stands in
Ty
Generally, however,
Yet only in
Idiq,
i.
19
ii.
6, 8.
54
yvvrf, xix.
13
e^opKicTTai, xix.
14
ap-)^ipus)
(6) as a
13
xvii.
18
XXV. 7
'
ejy^wj/
AttoXXcos-, xix.
rect
.
ii.
39
27
ot
aTTO r.
'Iou^afo9 Tapcrev^,
ot
xviii.
xxi.
rfi^a
34
'lou^., xviii.
24 'lou^aro?
^e
rf?
OLTTO iravTo^s
eOvovg)
^ X^/'"
"^^
I^''^^- ^^
Most
(x. 39),
often, however, it
nation
in a
rov avSpa ov
'lepoucraXtjjiA
<ttlv
rj
Xwvr}
avrrj
ovtw<s Si](TOV(nv
ev
ek X^^P^^
own nation
as ol ^lovSaioh
cf.
1 Thess.
ii.
14.^
AND HOUSES
'l(rpay]\
'la-parjXlTai
55
(five
times).
TrJ9 eXTr/^o? r.
28
^IcrpariX, xxi.
'la-parjX is
connections in which
the
in
Pauline
only
'la-patjXiTai
epistles).
occurs
(i.
48).
PapfiapoL (twice).
St.
in contrast to "EXX^/i/e?
to
so
use
it,
say,
but while
objectively, as
indeed
St.
Paul uses
every
it,
Jew could
St.
of Malta
uses
it
Greek descent.
Ot
KaroiKovvTcg
= the inhabitants
(thirteen
times).
LXX
^
4,
is
found in
St.
strange.
Luke
iiii.
;;
56
xi.
is
xiii.
(once),
yTj is
used either
Testament.
(yfj
While in
signifies
It
and
X.a\Saio)p
a particular land in
^ ytj avrrj
we read
= Palestine),
vii.
vii.
's
36, 40
UpovaaX-^fi,
14
ii.
in
ii.
it
is
s. 826 /., and Joh. Weiss, who thinks that a Kai must
be inserted after 'lovdaloi), rather it is demanded by the context.
The author wished to say that the people described some verses
later as Parthians, Medes, &c., who were dwelling at that time at
Jerusalem, were nevertheless Jews, and this is quite correctly expressed by the words ^aav 5^ iv 'lepovaaXrifj. KaroiKovvTes 'louSatot,
Ztschr. 1892,
llapoLKia
and
vaprbs ^duovs
tQ)v iivb
rbv ovpavbv.
rare occurrence
17
(yij
AlyvTrrov or
AND HOUSES
57
29
(ytj
AiyvTrTCi)),
vii.
^avaav, twice)
however, confined to lands mentioned
Testament, and is derived from the
M-aSidjui),
xiii.
19
{yrj
this
form of
24;
xiv. 15,
yri
where
expression.
it
is,
the Old
in
LXX
use
Luke
St.
In the we-
is
Sa\aa-(Ta).
there
once again.
In the sense of an
^lovSalcov, in
it is
found
com20 with
it is
xxvi.
in xii.
39 we read
ifieig
juLaprvpes iravTODv
58
u>v
re
eV
7roit](rev
'lepovcraXriiJLi
and
rj;
'^^^
'lovSalcov
aWa
toFj ev AajuLaa-Koii
X'^P9^
in xxvi.
20
lpo(To\v/uLoi9 1^ iradav
TTpcoTOV T6 KOI
koi
[eV]
^^wpav
Tr]v
t'^9 ''lovSaia?
Why
tj
^lovSaia, as
elsewhere
always names
We
forth.
may
assert that
he
and
Cilicia,
so
speaks because
so
cities, and because in official terminology the word " regiones " was also used of this
It
much
St.
Luke
is
as a witness
we
must regard him as a witness to the contrary. The
word 7repL-)((jopo9, sometimes found in the synoptic
eig rag
gospels, occurs only once in the Acts (xiv. 6)
in favour of the South-Galatian theory; rather
T^? AvKaovlag
TToXeig
AvcrTpav koi
Aep^tjv koi
Ttjv
it is
ireplyjMpov.
The
use of the
word X'^P^
^^^
The word
TroXf? is
city
Some
^pvylay
is
Xuplov
certainly a substantive.
(field) is
found in Acts
i.
18, 19
iv.
34
v. 3,
xxviii. 7.
AND HOUSES
XXVii. 8
59
TroXew?
and once
book
(xi.
iv iroXei 'Iotttt^)
instances where a
town
is
Sayuap/a?"
because
scarcely
knew what
when
it
the
city
assumed
author
was
meant, but
its
country.
Sometimes the author adds the name of the proname of the city. His reasons for this
procedure are not always the same, and are not always
as a rule, however, we may assume
clearly discernible
that it is because he wishes to draw attention to the
fact that the Gospel had now made its way into the
youthful missionary
particular province mentioned
perreligions count their conquests by provinces
haps also because he wishes to determine more accurately the geographical situation of the city and to
vince to the
cities
(xii. 20),
SiScinoj
'AXe^apdpevs
(vi.
(xii. 20),
'
Tapa^vs
xviii. 24),
Cf. also
Uoptik6s (xviii.
Kvprjfa'ios (vi.
xix. 29
9;
xi.
xxvii. 2),
20
xiiL
1),
Kvirpios (iv. 36
xi.
20
the terms
xxi. 16),
&C.
9;
60
St.
Luke
writes
Ava-rpa
AvKaoviag
(xiv. 6).
^iXiTTTTOi, rjTi^ ea-Tiv irpwTfj TfJ9 lULepiSos Ma/ce^ovlag TToXi? (XVi. 12).
Ta^cro?
Mvppa
is
CiHcia "
is
E^j
;
but JlLCihiav
read IIt<ri5as with D.
^ HoXItt}^ occurs only here in the Acts, but
the
man
of
'AvTioxeta-v tt,v
found elsewhere in
Hebrews in a
IIo\tTeftt=Roman citizenship only in Acts xxii. 28.
New Testament in
quotation).
St.
Luke
xv. 16
is
AND HOUSES
61
Hellenic culture.
tions
ttoX/tj/?.
word
use of the
TToX/? the
worthy of note.^
The mission was for the most
carried on in the cities, as also the Jews
part
Let me here point out another small detail which is nevertheimportance in reference to the author's consistency of style.
In general he does not use the article with names of cities. It is
found only in 23 (24) out of about 250 instances, if I have not overlooked any ; in xxvi. 12 the article is not quite certain (among the
59 instances where Jerusalem is named the article only occurs once
In 13 of these instances the reason of the addition of
in v. 28).
^
less of
the article
is
obvious
38
(ix. 3,
x. 8
xiii.
14
xvii. 13, 16
xviii.
21
xix. 17
passage
is
especially characteristic
A-varpav Kai
eh 'iKovioy Kal els 'AvTioxetav. The stay in Lystra had been shortly
before described in detail, therefore the article stands only with
But there remain yet nine instances which do not admit
this city.
of this explanation.
Of these
xviii.
2 drb
ttjs 'Pw/xtjs
and xxviii.
are sufficiently explained by the fame and importance of the city (and besides in xxviii. 14 it is implied that St.
Paul had at last reached the goal of his ministry afterwards in
14
verse 16
we read:
els 'Pufi-qv).
The
come
Cilicia
afterwards.
the circumstance that they mark the neceswhich the Apostle took {vide
62
Hence we read
in
viii.
40 of
St. Philip
Ta?
says
(xv.
SI)
Moses has
that
avvaywyah Tovg
Krjpua-o-ovTag
the
again
KaToi
James
St.
ttoXiv
and
avrov,
cities.
evrjyyeXil^eTo
ev raig
St.
Paul
through
(xvi. 4)
and to irXtjOog
crowded into the city
(xx. 23),
TToXecov 'lepova-aXrjjtx
roov irepi^
(v.
16) to
It is characteristic of the
be healed by the apostles.
exactness of the author that he often marks the fact
Stephen
that something took place outside the city.
sisters
in
iruXtjg
(xvi. 1 3)
Tyre accompany
Lastly, it is
Paul eo)? ^0) T?9 TToXew? (xxi. 5).
a fine proof of the precision of the author that in
xiii.
50 he speaks of the nrpwroi r^? TroXeco? (in
Antioch of Pisidia), in xxv. 23 of those Kar ^oyr]v
St.
T??
TTo'Xeo)? (in
the rulers of
(xvi.
1
cities,
Among
AND HOUSES
6,
of Malta (xxviii.
names are
8),
7)
63
TrpwTog
rtjg
vrja-ou.
These
Roman
colony Philippi
"
praetors (duumviri) held sway, the title " Politarch
correct, for in the
suit
the
name
of the same
official
every
in
other
city.i
The
*
is
US9 of TOTTog
is
simply
book are
The monarch
correct.
6 Ka7(rap (xvii.
xxv. 8-12, 21
64
ay log
SiaKOviag)
7 6 roirog ourog
Holy Land.
in vii.
0UT09,
25 (Xa^eiv rov
i.
Ttji
Xa/Beip)
used metaphorically in
It is
style.^
TOTTov
to be understood
is
In xvi. 3 ol tottol
as referring to the
Ktvoi describes
likewise
TOTTOvg
cKelvov.
ciTroa-ToXrjg
OLTTO Trjg
and even
in xii.
17
XXVii. 8 fjXOoimev
elg
tottov
tlvol
TlcTpog e^eXOwv
tov
KaXovjuLevov
KaXou?
Only once (XXi. 12) are the native inhabitants of a city called ol cvtottioi (the word is found
it is not one that is often met with).
in Plato
XijuLcvag).
The
The passages
xiii. 50),
31
note.
TO.
i]
xix. 27
In
iirapx^a (xxiii. 34
;
ii.
avuTepiKo.
Macedonia)
xxiv.
10
5),
&c.
we read
/M^pr),
rd
xxv.
The use
fx^prj riji
and likewise
1),
i}
of rd
(xi. 28
xvii, 6,
however, worthy of
in xix. 1 UavXos dieXdxcy
olKovfxh-r]
/xeprj is,
Ai^vijs,
in xx. 2 diiXduv
to, /xiprj
iKelva (said of
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES,
AND HOUSES
65
(iv.
13
vii.
26
xiii.
II.
The
Significance,
of nations in chapters
in vi. 9.
list
ii.
5,
9-11
and
WapQoi
KOVVTeg
M^^ot
Kcu
ILvpiav ? 'IvSlav ?] re
TO.
fJiepr]
ovvre^
Tiji Ai/3J//9
'PcojuLaioij
"Apa^e^].
After the
with
tinues
ol
rrjg
\_^lovSaLav ?
'A^pjuLevlav ?
koi TlajiKpvXlaVf
Kara
}^vp7]vr]i/j
AHyvirrou koi
koi ol
e-TriSrjjuL-
first
name
national
koi
^pvyiav re
Trjv 'A^alaVj
iS/Lea-OTroTa/uLiav
rrjv
names
three national
KUTOiKovvreg, because
for
Mesopotamia
St.
Luke con-
there was no
Luke
is
yet he describes
In
abode.
as KaroiKOvureq
KOVVT69
of
all
MSS.
and once
is senseless,
in Augustine), as well as
^vplav (Hieron.),
away a
difiiculty
66
which was
already at an
felt
no satisfactory explanation
The
this word.
this
in
section
KjO?Te? Koi
an ancient
and
for
here
both the
"
01
special
The assumption
Koi.
the appended
we must assume
also
also
mention of
surprising, so
is
gloss,
traordinary.
we must
*'AjOa/3e?,
these people
early date;
We
if
is
ex-
interpolation
7r/)0(7?i\fT0t"
eiTL^riij.ovvre's 'Pcojuaioh''
of an
The
national names, as is almost certainly the case.
author had said at the beginning of the list that
he was concerned with those Jezcs now dwelling in
Jerusalem who had before lived in Parthia, Media,
At
&c.
by birth and
my
proselytes,
and
opinion
ol 'Yco/maioi
it
lastly,
is
'Vwjuiaioi.
the
In
Roman
citizens" {vide Acts xvi. 37, 38; xxii. 25, 26, 27, 29;
xxiii. 27).
Instead of ol
St.
KaToiKovvT9
ol
Luke
eTriSrjujL.
'Pcoyu.
Tr]v 'Ycojuifjv
(as
now dwelt
in Jerusalem,
though
to
West
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES,
67
home
"
AND HOUSES
in other lands.
Thus
does not mean " Romans
Rome "
(as Wendt and others would interbut " Romans who had migrated to Jerusalem
and had settled in that city" (so Overbeck). The
circumstance that after striking out ^lovSaiav, Ko^re?,
and "AjOa^Se? we are left with a list of twelve nations
settled in
pret),
i.e.
the omission
the author perhaps intended to indicate that each apostle spoke in one of
confirms
It is true that
these tongues.
according to
ii.
we
the
Christians
Jerusalem
in
but
nevertheless,
who
according to
ii.
thought
of.
hypothesis,
it
7, it is
are
If
The
East,
With Kara
rbirov i\du}i>,
Ilafji(pvXlav.
Kvp-qvrjv compare
and Acts ZXvii. 6
St.
:
Luke
x.
32
68
He
Syria because
it
lay too
and because
it
and
is
thus marked.
ligible.
It has
been said
of
list,
Pentecost
was no
miracle
least
tion
is
because for
language
universally-spoken
at
all,
the
at
this explana-
The
disciples
in
ecstasy spoke
69
(v.
XaXovvreg ToXiXaiot
peninsula (Macedonia and Achaia)
ov-)(ji
AND HOUSES
The Balkan
el<Tiv ol
7
;).
is
passed over either because in this region, when compared with the others mentioned, the Jews were not
specially
numerous, or because
to Cyrene
The formal
is
very
itself,
brings
We
trace
skill
of the Hellene.
(raXrjfJ-
fct'
ecr-^arov t??
Ta
irepi
*Pw/JLr]v
v/uLiv
yrj'i
e/mov
I (i. 8).
ety
'lepoucraXri/ui,
(xxiii.
fxapTuptjcrai
Koi
Odpcrei'
11).
o)?
yap
ovtw ae
SiejuLaprvpo)
Set
koi
Tvoxttov ovv
cfV
Io-to)
On the
avTo). Kai aKOvarovrai (xxviii. 28).
very threshold of a work, which was intended to
Oeov'
Cf.Etrm.Simil.
the world.
ix.
70
placed this
is
list
how
representatives
of mankind are
now
The
abolished
in
seen to be annulled
True,
of Libertines,
men of
Cyrene,
of
Alexandria,
of
and Asia, dwelling in Jerusalem. Unfortunately we cannot gain a quite clear conception of
Cilicia
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES,
the meaning of the words;
AND HOUSES
for
St.
71
witness is borne to
not a worked-up description
some representatives of the nations mentioned in ii.
9^., namely men of Cyrene, Alexandria (Egypt), and
Asia.
Hence Jews and proselytes from these regions
moreover probable
is
in itself.
Samaria and
Phoenicia).
Apostles, we learn
from his own account that he accompanied the Apostle
St. Paul to Jerusalem (chap, xxi.), and that about
two and a half years later he journeyed with him
\eyoiJ.^yr]i
dv4<rT7]crav
Ai^eprbuy Kal
KiXiKias Kal
'Aai'as
de rives tCov
Kvprjpaiui'
<Tvv^t]TovvTe%
ti^
Kal
iK riji crwa7a)7T7j
'AXe^avSpewp Kal
"Lrecpdvij},
tG)v
ttjs
arrb
According to the
of
Cilicia
satisfactory).
depend upon
nves.
72
It is
from Caesarea to Rome (chaps, xxvii. xxviii.).
more than doubtful whether he was with the Apostle
between these two dates, for the " we " breaks off
directly after the arrival in Jerusalem, and first
The
appears again at the departure from Caesarea.
explanation that the " we " does not appear in the
shared in
record.
is
that St.
experiences
various occasions
when
St.
We
an eye-witness.
Luke
set foot
may
therefore
soil
assume that
of Palestine
left it
We
accordingly expect
'lou^a/a?,
o'lSare
ap^djULvo^
airo
r^?
KaO'
YaKiKaLa^
37)
the
oXrjg
r^y
jiieTa
to
movement
AND HOUSES
73
(i.
their
dialect
(ii.
iSov aTravreg
ov-)(jl
\a\ovvTs TaXiXaloi;
St.
cf.
Mark
ovtol
xiv.
ol
ela-iv
31)
(ix.
YaXiXalag
'lou^a/a? KOI
Luke
however, in
this,
menit
merely a reminiscence
it is
probability answers
all
few times,
Galilee to be
it is
included in Judaea.
is
koi ^afxaplag.
to actual
St.
'l77(roCs
(Xpto-T^s) 6
xxvi. 9)
cisive
It is
it is
that
book
in the
Nafwporos
probable in
6 Nafw/jaioj
noteworthy that
St.
(ii.
(x. 38),
22
itself
iii.
but
iv.
10
vi.
14
six times
;
xxii. 8
is
de-
of Nazareth.
Paul never uses the expression, and that
it occurs only in the first half of the Acts, or rather the only two
passages in the second half where it occurs really belong, so far
as their subject is concerned, to the first half. The designation
"Jesus the Nazarene" is thus Palestinian, and is only used by
St. Luke in order to give the right colouring to the first half of his
is
expressed in
St.
John
i.
i)
45
'Irja-ovv
Nafap^r SvyaraL
ti
dyadby ehau
like
.
74
centre of the
movement soon
after
the Crucifixion
of our Lord.^
Judaea
is
in the book.
and
and KaroiKovvreg ev rfj 'lovSala aSeXipol (xi. 29), we may compare
Gal. i. 22 ai eKKXtjciai r^? 'lovSaiag and 1 Thess. ii. 14
the phrases
Tof^a/a?
(ix. 31),^
is
noteworthy
not belong
ai KK\r](Tiai at ouaai ev
that St.
Luke
r^ ^lovSala.
It
word in xii. 19
and XXi. 10 he writes KareXOwv oltto rrjg 'lovSalag e/'y
rLaiaraplav and KarrjXOh ng otto t^? ^lovSaiag irpocbrjTrjg
to Judaea in the proper sense of the
\eh
}^aLarapLav'\
respectively
note
from
viii.
Luke did
26-40;
ix.
32^. one
the
coincidence
but already,
recognises
that St.
Philistian cities as
in viii.
40 he writes
AND HOUSES
Sip-)(^6/uiV09
75
vt]yy-
Xil^ero
ttjOO?
tov^ ayiov^
Church," the rest were only in dependent filial relaSt. Luke thus shows himself welltionship to her.
him
20
St.
not at least
t^ X^p^ 't*]^
proved that he did
preach in Judaea, and before the time mentioned in
Gal. i. 22 he cannot have done so ; but why may he
not have proclaimed the Gospel in this region on the
occasion of later visits when he was journeying from
Antioch or Caesarea to Jerusalem ? For this ministry
days, not weeks, were quite sufficient, and he himself
say, in Judaea,
'lovSaiag.
It cannot, in fact, be
iv iraa-n
"
76
(Rom.
says
jme
airo^lepovcrcCKruJ.
well
'
known
St.
Mark
sage where
Matthew
name
'lepova-aXTJ/uL
sometimes *lpova-d\}ijuL^
mutual relationship.
In
again
proof of
their
we can with-
and
Xuiv
TOVTOu^
1 Cor. xvi.
7r/yu\f/-a)
Eamsay
Cf.
Vide
TO evayye-
elg 'lepovcraXijjuL.
is
[the
But
thinking of the
my work
& Norgate,
is
found
(iii.
12
xxi. 2, 10).
AND HOUSES
77
saints
In regard to St.
matter
is
statistical
names
Luke''s
summary of the
Chaps,
i.vii.
occurrences
'lepoa-oXvjjLa
once
of the two
'lepovaaXijiuL
eleven times.
Chaps, viii.-xv.
fifteen times.
The
twice
we-sections
aaXyjiui
Here the
uses
'lepou-
three times.
Chaps, xxii.xxviii
(TaXrjfjL
^lepoa-o-
'lepovcraX^/uL twice.
six times.
first
'lepova-aXTjjuL
thing to notice
is
Luke
much
that St.
times)
(thirty- seven
very
^lepoa-oXu/jia
28;
xxiii. 7)
times,
(ii.
22
xiii.
22
xix.
ratio obtains
it
twenty-six times),
it
is
at once evident
The manuscripts
is
which form
St.
Luke
chose.
We here leave D
out of consideration.
78
Acts
in
for
affection
especial
and
In
'lepoua-aXyjiuL.
taken together,
i.xv.
gospel
his
occurs
'lepova-aXij/uL
to notice
is
is
point
But who
in
Here
with
the
Luke
St.
Mark
St.
in the parts
place written
first
which he has
in
common
xiii.
22
TTOpeiav
SieTropeueTO
TfOLOujuLevo^
e/uLTTpocrOev
eh
ttoXci^
lepoc),
koi
xix.
eh lepoaroXvjuia,
avrov ev lepocr.).
avapa[v(jov
Kara
28
kcojulgs
:
xxiii.
eiropeveTO
irpog
lepovo-aXrjjuL is
AND HOUSES
79
4),
of the Church
only speaks of
is
(eleven times).
^lepova-akrjij.
when, however,
we
But among these verses stands
prophet Agabus ; here we read in oratio
;
arrived at Jerusalem).
a saying of the
this
Stjo-ovo-lv ev
'lepou-
ol ^lovSaioi,
(XXi. 13)
The
tov avSpa
a-aXij/j.
airoQavelv
Biblical
form
el<s
'lepovcraXrjiuL
eroZ/xo)?
alone
'lepovaraXrjfji
suited
^X^*
the
somewhat petty
and
so it
is.
80
chapters
in
viii.-xxviii.
We
xxviii.
yet
is
But even
less
frequently
in chapters xxii.
18;
17,
5,
xxiii.
and
in Coesarea
the scene
is
(xxviii. 17) in
Rome.
makes the
dijBfer-
14, 25
St.
xi.
27
xiii.
13
xvi. 4,
and
xix.
21 (lepova-a'
X>}/x
viii.
25;
Evidently
xii.
xiii.
27, 31;
xv.
'lepova-akruj.
of the Acts.
The
is
rule
2,
still
is
39;
xi. 2,
22;
xx. 22;
xxi. 31).
4;
the rule in this part
In chapters xxii.-xxviii.
(in
(c/. viii.
27
AND HOUSES
(viii. 1,
is
81
situated there
stand in Antioch
Lycaonia
(xvi.
variation
sections
(xi.
27),
and
4),
in
chapters viii.xxi.
in
not to be explained,
is
omitting
the we-
Luke
that St.
i.e.
keeps to
And
number of
yet the
no
and
not clear
is
is
is
seven.
regard
Judaea the
to the
passages wherein
')(ou(ra
'EjUL/uLaovg
But we
y^av
/'?
airo
KWfjLri
'lepoucraXrjiuL,
fj
uire-
oi/ojua
Acts
(i.
12)
rare
virea-rpe-
(i.
19)
cocTTe
^lepovcroXrjjuL
KXrjOfjvai
Kara^alvovarav airo
*IepovaraXt]juL ei^
Yd^av
avrt] iarlv
82
The
epfjjiio^}
mentioned here.
also be
St.
might
first disciples
were
he has a definite
conception of the locality of the prison where St.
Peter was confined and of its distance from the house
(TvvrjOpoKTiuievoL
just
Krjv
mentioned
(pepovaav
(xii. 10/*.
ei^ rrjv
JULiav
oklav
rrjv
irpoG-evyoiJ.evoi)
Sevrepav rjXQav
Koi
pvixriv
Koi
rrj^
ttoXlv
.
eir\
.
Koi
6 Tlerpo^
Had
Mapm).
rjXOev
he visited
St.
eiri
Paul
in
rj
r]
iepov (iv. 1
v.
Romana
auxil'iaris,
(xxi.
place.
3
Knowledge
of the
Temple
is
83
He
tcov
aipe<TL<s
'HaSSovKalwi/.
tj
Similarly, he shows
he
^aSSouKaioL
ayyeXov
yap
fxev
Xeyovcriv
/ulj]
7rvv,ua, ^apicratoi
jULrjre
known
Se
ojuLoXoyovcriv to,
ajULCporepa.
to
Jerusalem,
all
remained
He knows
that of the
(xxiii. 9).
He
^tjXcorai
of the Comicil of
rov
5 ; vi. 12) a
part belonged to the Pharisees and a part did not
TijULiog
iravTL
tells
t(x>
ypa/uL/uLareig (iv.
Xaw
unknown
so much
him
It
is
not
(xxi.
84
concerning
the
choice
names, or concerning
teaching against the
heroic
Temple,^
or
their
and
Stephen
concerning
his
the
us suspect
the
many
first place,
other shadows.
in
the
in
admir-
St.
Luke
Paul
it is
which
St.
AND HOUSES
85
it
That the
ment.
stationed
in
orTreipa
Coesarea
probably meant
by
rj
St.
KoXovimevr]
Luke
and
first
1,
was
quite
cannot
be
it is still less
The
x.
yet we
'IraXiKyj
according to
is,
I.^ s.
(as
462 f.).
the
40)
thence he worked through the principal towns until
32/!, 36
They
ff*.),
(viii.
Other
and Joppa
(loc. cii.).
mentioned
specially
OoXaa-aav "
tanning
(ix.
trade
43
the
x. 6, 17)
narratives
86
ing this
Til
i.
is
ff.).
The
rejoicing concern-
already reflected in
i.
{ev iracru
(viii.
success
first
31
SeScKTaL
rj
^a/jLapla tov
3),
again in
Xoyov tov
Oeov,
viii.
and
14:
in the
emphasis laid upon the fact that here the gospel had
won its way into many villages (viii. 25) but even
;
Luke we may
conversion of Samaritans
11, 16,
but
other hand,
self seen
John
trace a reflection of
(ix.
iv.
52
x.
33
xvii.
Yet on the
Luke had not him-
39/.).
its
topography
(viii. 9),
in that
"
was especially hearty. The general name " Phoenicia
Xxi. 2) in the Acts.
In
xv. 3
occurs thrice (xi. 19
the second passage it stands together with Samaria
in the first (according to viii. 1) Samaria is also to
be supplied SitiXOov [from Samaria] ewg ^oivik}]<; koi
at that time the foundation
KvTrpov Koi. AvTLO-^ela^
of the Phoenician Church was laid by those who had
;
AND HOUSES
87
at
purely geographical.
is
Phoenicia,
Philistian
cities,^
and to
Damascus.
special information,
it.
He knows that it had several
synagogues (ix. 20), that one of its streets was
called ^ evQela " (ix. ll),^ and that St. Paul took
up his abode there in the house of a man named
himself visited
Judas.
Syria and
In the Acts Syria
Cilicia.
is
18
(xviii.
ek
Trjv
e^eirXei
^uplav,
el^
rtjv
XXi. 3
^vplav, xx. 3
eTrXeOyaei/
ef?
avayecrOaL
^vpiav
Trjv
21
it
again occurs,
in the
it
two other
stands
just
as
i.
The south-western
we know
of
Palestine,
Judaea.
'H
Kokovfiht) evdela.
This use of KoXeiadai is charregard to the consistency of St. Luke's style.
It
occurs about fifteen times in the gospel and likewise fifteen times
in the Acts, including four times in the we-sections (xxvii. 8, 14,
16 J xxviii. 1).
2
pv/x7}
acteristic in
7)
88
It is
view formed a single ecclesiastical district.^
centre
its
in
district
Christian
Gentile
great
the first
;
The
capital
of
it
as,
Christendom.*
He
that
relates
This variation in
exhibits knowledge and conscientious care.
the /coupling of the province with other provinces is highly characteristic.
2 In this connection it is also most significant, that the native
place of only one of "the Seven" is mentioned (vi. 5: NtxiXaor
"Trpoa-rjXvTos
'Avtiox^vs).
(ix.
him
St.
11
xxi. 89
thither
by way
way (Ramsay,
otherwise).
" St. Paul the Traveller " [1897], p. 70, 233, explains
AND HOUSES
89
its
founders ^ he knows that at the very beginning it was extraordinarily flourishing (xi. 21 7roXi'9
apiOjuLOi), that through the ministry of Barnabas,
its
who came
stronger
of a year
and
thither
Jerusalem,^
that
grew yet
it
it
Paul,
St.
from
22-24), and
(xi.
whom
He
25, 26).*
(xi.
that the
name "
'Arrtoxf ^as,
fjLrjSevl
their offer-
and he has
xi.
19
el /xt) 'Iov5ti.iot.s
and xi. 20
and iXdopres
Chap.
xi.
19
of those driven
mission in Antioch. On the other hand, the " old disciple " Mnason
the Cypriote (xxi. 6), with whom St. Paul lodged at Jerusalem,
may have belonged to them. St. Paul may even on this account have
90
ance of
The great
Paul.
''AvTi6-)(iav,
Oeov
TO epyov
e/?
lULGT
KK\t]criav,
eig
'^^^
rr]
X^P''^'
Trapayevojuievoi Se koi
o eirXijpdocrav,
o-uvaydyovres r^v
6 Oeos
26 y!: aviirXevo-av
avijyyeWov
i^voi^ev
ocra eiroLrjaev
Luke who
it is
TLavXov
K.T.\.
01 7rpo7re/uL(p6VTeg vtto
t^?
e/CAcX7/cr/a9,
XV. 1 /. 3).
and
is
put
first,
then
journey
epistles tell us
nothing about
it,
been
left
fills
ii.
11
AND HOUSES
The
Indeed, we could
epistles.
which
is
representation
by the Pauline
accounts there
91
St.
Luke
is
!
unless
Yet
we
in
pos-
these
is
to be found in
The
not very great.
experience
personal
the
upon
not
narrative depends
and the eye-witness of the writer, but upon tradition.^
We can control this tradition scarcely at a single
amount
point;
which
yet
is
it
untenable, and
much on
Abstract specu-
incorrect, or
Church,' but
St.
^ Even for this reason the " we " of codex D in xi. 28 is certainly
not original; vide Sitzungsber der K. Preuss. Akad. d. WissenscJi.,
1899, April 6.
2 If one restricts the old controversy, concerning the relationship
of Gal. ii. to Acts xv. to Gal. ii. 1-2, and Acts xv. 1-4 and it is
only with these verses that we are here concerned we may declare
.
More than
this
92
Luke was a
native
of Antioch
still
remains
most
It of course does
worthy of note in this connection.
not therefore follow that he was ever a member of
the Christian community of Antioch; indeed, the
form in which this ancient record has come down to
us is not even favourable to such a supposition.
and
St.
St.
information
definite
More
exact
(eminent
persons
"
The
generalities
what they
make
can.^
AND HOUSES
93
Paulus).
mission
in
by
tioned in
xiii.
himself from
13 because
St.
The
St. Paul).^
Mark
here separated
choice of a place of
decision
to
start
the
mission
to
The
large
number of
'
This
is
Ramsay
gives a noteworthy
Ramsay,
loc. cit. p.
103.
{loc.
cit.
94
Roman
The
Administration.
general significance
its
style,
and
is
moreover confused
it
is
correct
close
combination.
St.
cities
Derbe and
first),^
{loc,
and
cit.
p.
^^
^^^^
The
which
Ramsay
t^v wepl^wpov}
eig
110^.) again
Xy^po^,
is
also used
by
very expression
St.
Luke
in
Trepi-
his gospel
It is
Toii diioyfioTs,
iv AOffrpois,
rots iradiifiaaiVj
oU.
fioi
AND HOUSES
(iii.
Mark
(i.
xiv. 35)
iv.
14,
37;
vii.
17;
St.
itself
and by St.
Matthew (iii. 3
37),
viii.
and by
95
makes
it
very im-
had
in his
If he
had had
rj
this
Trepl-^^copo^,
Both
cities
flight thither
Hence
also be
96
we can never
The
arrive
decisive turn
i.e.
on
certainty
at
this
but
point.
in the journey
towards the
i.e.
That he
did not follow this road to the end, but turned back
upon
his
route,
is
further explanation.
way
territory of Isauria
language of Lycaonia
(xiv. 11)
is first
mentioned
492/.
p.
48
genit.
Moulton,
Eamsay
-uv. The
"A Grammar
{loc.
cit.
p.
of
129)
New
who
e.g.
names were
and
treated as
name
at the
like Lystra,
C E
H L P,
&c., read
Ai/55o;'), yet
In ix. 35 we read in
gome authorities top Sapwva, in others tov Zapuvav and in xxi. 1
cis TTJv Kw and e^s rrjv KQv.
^ Ramsay
{Expositor, September, 1905) remarks that the most
ancient graves in Lystra bear Latin inscriptions, while in Iconium
Greek
is
the rule.
AND HOUSES
97
of a geographical character.^
The
TroXeig
(xvi. 4)
Phryg-ia
He
Within
Antioch
(xviii.
missionary undertaking
the mission
Nevertheless in xvi. 6, by
touched upon in his book.
means of the characteristic word Siepj^eaOai and in
xviii. 23 by this same word combined with aTrjplYeiv
Travra^ rovg juLaOrjragi
it
is
while
* In xvi. 1-3 Derbe and Lystra are yet again mentioned only for
the purpose of telling how it was that Timothy, who belonged to
the latter city, came into contact with St. Paul. St. Luke has thus
a special interest in this companion of St. Paul, and very naturally
so,
;;
98
Mysia
in regard to
(TrapeXOovreg, xvi. 8)
and Bithynia
'jropevOrji'cih f^cu
ovk eiaaev
was that
PauPs own purpose to preach in those
countries no mission was started there,^ except in the
Mysian port Troas (XVi. 9, 11; XX. 6^.). The passage xvi. 6-9 is one of the most remarkable in the
whole book for at the very moment when St. Paul
avrov<5
TO
irvev/xa 'Irjcrov)
it
in spite of St.
tion
begin.
If,
intelligible in connection
as a prelude to
it,
so
also in
its
details it testifies
is
What
identical with
is
narrated in
xvi.
Paul himself.
He
St.
Tontus.
as
to
9
of
LANDS, NATIONS, CITIES, AND HOUSES
99
Finally, he was
through Mysia without venturing to preach
yet even here he
there, and at last arrived at Troas
had not reached the appointed goal, but the Spirit
The final direction of
directed him to Macedonia.
the Spirit embodied itself in the vision by night
Nothing in the book
of the Man of Macedonia.
approaches the conviction with which at this place
the leading of the Apostle by the Spirit is pictured.
In this way St. Luke heralds, not the entry of a new
source, but the coming of St. Paul to Macedonia and
According to Ramsay
his own meeting with St. Paul.
an
St. Luke himself was the man of Macedonia
attractive conjecture, which had also once suggested
itself to me before I knew of Ramsay's hypothesis
but it cannot be proved, and there is also much to be
also led
it.
In its favour stands the circumstance
that the appearance of the " we " at this point would
said against
receive
startle us like
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
100
bition,
its
and
special revelation to
it
therefore needed a
summon
new
In any
69
Only compare:
Word
They assayed
the
in Asia.
not.
and
[The
vision in
concluding that
God had
called
its
to preach
who
is
man
;
writes
rather the
AND HOUSES
of the narrative at
who is personally
he narrates, and now wishes to
qtwrumpars magna fuit.
implies a writer
word y^po.
St. Paul had
supra
a former occasion.
is
point
this
interested in
what
pass on to things
101
here at
1,
to
102
concerning the
Luke
provinces,
countries,
and
cities
of
is
There
what
standpoint.
correct form.
of the author,
no flaunting of geographical
is
erudition, but
is
necessary
is
always given in
ously displayed.
Wherever
in
this
(Hoptov
except in
KOI
vi.
rhv 'Acriav,
9),
it
9 (KikiKia^ koi
vi.
'Acr/a?),
xvi.
AND HOUSES
103
Kara
bound
Asia
for
of
it
its
e<V
Adra-
native shores,
follows that it
is
is
specially
well
known
to
the
author.
(XX. 15,
vide infra),
104
in the
fairly detailed
found at
there
first
19,
(xviii.
visit,
The
real
founders
of
the
first
number of Jews
The
Word
in
of
God
(xix. 10),
but
it
is
suggested
(xix. 1) that
AND HOUSES
105
is
reported
Of the
cities in
is
is
Rom.
of whose foundation
is
therefore the
is
It
are,
himself
[he does
e^o)
7rop(pup67ra)Xi?
r??
ttJX;??
tw UavXw
TroAeo)? Qvarelpcop,
again
Asia.
left
the Apostle
home
in Philippi, per-
an
hypothesis
106
which
is
time have
he must
unknown reasons
at this
for he
was not involved in the fate which overtook St. Paul
and Silas in Philippi.
It is unsafe to conclude that
the remarkable description of Philippi (rJTig ia-rlv
left
is
In reference to Thessalonica
native
city
(xvii.
1, 11, 1-3),
the
of Aristarchus
of Macedonia."
r?;s, is
irpQiTos
St.
in-
in the
Luke
xix.
district."
AND HOUSES
107
1),^
would show
of the father
that the
birth.
is,
unusual in
man was
of good
besides, characteristic
of the country.
Achaia
Corinth
is
is
first
the
New
Acha'ans
Testament).
The
calls itself in
1887,
p.
116)
Atodevaavres,
rijv
A/JLtpiiroKiv
Hai/eWrjvegj
This varia-
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
108
and Hellas
characteristic of
is
The
16, 21,
22
xviii.
1)
Athens
(xvii.
15,
is
also, so far as
these people
TL
oiKoveiv
he
knows
eig
KaivoTepov)^
the
rj
portraits
tradition.
on
The
of
r]
quotation, and
poetical
also
Xeyeiv ri
who
paints
use that
is
made of "
the
Unknown
God,*"
" the
do not
St.
memory
of those
may
who heard
it,
Titius
*
in
the
neighbourhood
me
of the synauntenable.
AND HOUSES
gogue.^
On
18.
is
mentioned
109
in xviii.
i.e.
and
in Corinth
stayed
sometimes
with
detailed
He
He
stays in Thessalonica iv ry
first
(xviii. 3).
He
He
T]
stays
olKig. Tjv
(Twofiopovaa
(fiifeiv)
He
He
stays
Rome
in
{fjL^veip)
ffTpaTiibTTj
(xxviii.
Mark
Lydda
(ix,
f)<rav
37, 39)
in Jerusalem
or again,
16),
.
he stays {imxheiv)
Kara/xivovres in
the house of
(xii. 12)
the house of the jailor in Philippi
the virepQov in Troas, o5 rifx^v a-vvrjyfiivoi (xx, 8)
the
axo^v Tvpdvvov in Ephesus (xix. 9). How do the supporters of the
we-source hypothesis stand in the face of a situation like this ? Of
these passages six stand in the we-sections, nine in the remaining
parts of the book. It must be assumed, I suppose, that the author
of the whole book was interested in " houses," and had the fortune
St.
(xvi. 34)
to
110
Italy.
Italy
Rome
and
lie
St.
Luke
mark the
limits of the
tended.
Rome
for
it is
think of an Alexandrian
to
Rome.
" Romans " are already mentioned in the
list
of
ft)?
(ii.
10)
Trepi
Si/uLapTup(jo TO,
ijuLou
eig
lepovarakijjuL, outco
ae
Rome !).
ek
These words are again taken up in XXVii. 24 (here
the emperor stands in the place of Rome), and the
Set Koi
'P(jojuLr]v
arrival in
Rome
We, however,
is
Malta (XXViii.
(XXViii. 13),
Of
places belonging
to
and
Italy,
Rhegium
Forum and
has the meaning " Koman citizen " in xvi. 21, 27, 38 ;
In xxv. 16 it occurs in a wider sense
xxiii. 27.
;
i6os'F(afji.aloi.s, and here the Roman sense of justice is
1 "P(afia7o$
xxii.
25-27, 29
ovK i<TTLv
commended.
AND HOUSES
111
Gyrene.
nations
Kou
(ii.
TO.
juLcptj
only
occurs elsewhere
T?9 KUTCi
in
who had
is
of
Egypt
K.vpr]ut]v.
quotations from
list
AHyvirTOfi
the Old
mentioned
Concern-
Luke
first
missionaries to
and he notes among the prophets and teachers of the Church in Antioch Lucius
the Gentiles
of Cyrene
(xi. 20),
(xiii. 1).
to Ethiopia
is
By an
(viii.
27)
crr]g
6 and
xxviii.
IL
112
The geogra-
phical and
chronological
references
and
notices
in
book
is
also
The author
of
work.
Appendix
jS-recension.
viii. 1.
and
'lepoaroXvjma.
superfluous addition
o1 cfxeivav iv^IepovcraX^j/j.
(DLK).
2.
viii. 4.
dispersed
by the
Word, we have
addition
et castella)
persecution
Kara Tag
''lov^am (L).
of the book
preached the
/ca)//?
is
once found
(viii.
25, vide
supra).
S.
viii. 5.
In place of eh
rrjv iroXiv
t^? ^ajmapiag
eiV
L stands
113
ix. 32.
KOI ywpoov
5.
{xfjiipoL,
"vide
Before ore Se
xi. 2.
DLS
Xjjjul
add
supra).
ave/Sr]
Tlerpog
6 /mev ovv
'lepovcra-
ei?
Uerpog
Sia iKavov
irpoarcpcovijcrag
Kal
rovg aSeXcpovg
[aiyroi/?]
7ri(jT>]pi^ag
Xoyov
TTOioviLievog
[scil.
in Caesarea]
iroXvv
e^^XOei/,
re
SiSdarKoop
of
character
6.
DSL
xii. 1.
this
here add
^r\iy
kv rrj ^lovSala in
xi. 30.
xii. 10.
St.
(BaOjULovg Koi,
D has
8.
xii.
^
25.
AvTi6-)(iav
in
inserts
e/V
xiv. 6.
Tr]v
irepL-^copov
25.
DS
insert
avrovg,
evayyeXi(^6fjLvoL
an express statement
that a church had been founded also in
Attalia.
The interpolator probably knew of
a church there.
because
they
missed
114
11. xvi. 1.
TCI
made an
(xv.
ravra because
'idvrj
interpolation
The secondary
41).
abeady
had
they
in
previous
verse
character here
is
^lep-^^ea-Qm
The
use of
12. xvi. 6.
of VaKariKhv
regiones "
)(u)pav
this is
the
"Galatiae
plural
Yet
unimportant.
Blass
of
Instead
8.
doubtedly
correct
significance,
DL
read
(rrjv Mfcr/ai/).
The
14. xvii. 1.
difficult
TrapeXOovres,
here a metaphorical
SieXOovreg
the
insertion in
of KarrjXQov
now
eig
lose its
article)
is
Apostles
also
preached
in
Apollonia (vide
Here
is
found
in
yap
cfV
The
inter-
explain
it
polation (though
in
it
AND HOUSES
115
an explanatory inter-
new
was in-
Apollos
rij
TrarplSi
(i.e.
in
eig
to
Alexandria).-^
The
(DS
interpolation Spajmovreg
but
locality,
18.
XX.
is
now
After
15.
SL
^djmov
eig
many
its
cursives)
rTpcoyv-
XX/ft)].
ing
irape^aXojuLev
is
intelligible
yet on
this
DLK
Here
1.
lidrapa
probably
insert koi
an
Mvpa
interpolation
after
after
xxvii. 5/.
DS
20. xxi. 16 y!
TTjOO?
read here
ovtoi Se ^yov
Kcojuitjv
/maOtjTr]
ap'^aLUi^
^lepoa-oXvjma.
nrapd
^volg-wvl
e'lg
The host
is
Tiva
Kutt^/co,
elg
thus represented
appears at
jj/ulu^
and
This text
sight very attractive; on closer
itself.
churches in Achaia.
116
moreover, we can
see
how
it
somewhat
is
not clear
s.
101
/.).
Luke
whom
St
of Gentile
following
pitality
Caesarea
21, xxvii. 5.
SiaTrXevcravTeg.
LS and
words
e^o)
jueveiv
Kad"*
eavTov (explanatory).
Many
only those in
to originality.
but
10 and XX. 15 have a certain claim
No certain conclusion can be drawn as
;
xii.
The
inter-
the insertion of
Myra
in xxi. 1
and of the
village
had some
interest in
CHAPTER
III
St.
persons,
in his
^S*^.
The former
introduced in
i.
chief characters.
15 as already known
to
and antecedents.
come out
in his
His character
speeches and
actions.
is
St.
the
Acts,
is
'I.
be called an exception.
117
Xp.
^vxo-i aiirdv
118
description
inthians
this
is
and
his
work
in the
On
the whole the book makes St. Paul stand out in ever
so
much
at the conclu-
is
which ought
not to be overlooked.
' From the point of view of the space dedicated to St. Paul and
of the whole structure of the book itself, one cannot definitely prove
that St. Paul was not intended to be the sole hero of the Acts. We
must, however, remember, that not only are several very important,
indeed fundamentally important, discourses put into the mouth of
St. Peter, but that the story of Cornelius, in which he plays the
prominent part, also occupies a central position in the book, and
that with this story chap. xv. is most closely connected {vide xv.
7, 14).
119
The name of
in the
book
this account
apostle
(xiv. 4, 14).^
significance.
But
Luke
Among
St.
num-
would exclude
these, then
only Jive
personages of
St.
Paul an apostle.
120
(Stephen,
vi.
viii. Gy*.
Barnabas,
xviii.
8,
5,
24^.).
It is
iv.
great
is
St.
Barnabas comes
made
in viii.
35 to a missionary sermon of
his
on a
are
to St.
Luke of
is
and indeed
work.
They
on
this point.
is
The key
me
to
121
lie in
xviii. 28.
Apollos culmi-
this gifted
Luke
Seeing that St. Luke was personally acquainted with Silas and Timothy, and yet does not
in his work give them special prominence as missionStephen.
aries,
it
Ac-
122
Paul.
St.
James, the
brilliantly justified
is
fifth personality
It is
of this
by
St.
series,
presupposed that
assumed that
though
known. The readers evidently knew
that he was the Lord's brother,
this is nowhere stated
and that he had become the head of the Primitive Community after the Twelve had quite given
up the leadership, which had already been limited
by the appointment of the " Seven." We receive no
direct information concerning him, indeed in two of
the three passages where his name occurs extraordinarily little is said about him (xii. 17; xxi. iSff.).
he
is
it is
an individual amid the body of presbyters at Jerusalem, and in the first passage one can only just
recognise that he is the head of " the brethren " in
But in the third passage (xv. 13 y.), for
Jerusalem.^
which xii. 17 is evidently intended to prepare, he
a part of the highest, indeed of decisive,
As to
importance in the general plan of the book.
St. Stephen, so also to him a speech is assigned, and
it was this speech that settled the whole question
plays
under discussion.
We can, moreover, distinguish in the book personages of a third degree of importance, individuals
whom St. Luke thought it worth while or necessary
just to mention, without going into closer detail concerning them, either because they were of no import1
is
St.
James
in xii. 27
of the book.
123
ance at
names
is
given
described in
xii.
is
(i.
in XX. 4.
Of
these persons,
one of
whom we
why
who
all,
St.
Mark
is
the only
We
and that
^
it is
this
St.
In this passage he
with St. James in
is,
as
it
xii. 17.
124
relations with
is
St.
with xvi. 1
ff.), likewise
Barnabas (xv.
rent footing with
St.
40).
That
Silas stood
on a
diffe-
St.
his place
is
inserted the
name
had taken
We
readers
The
knew
this
125
suffered
This
indeed he
tells
us no details at
my
opinion, only
these
three
classes
of
actors,
who
are
all
They
as the actors,
and
it
We exclude
Pilate, &c.
ne
name
of the damsel
who was
possessed by an evil
/.) ?
same
city
Grammateus
Jerusalem
(xxiii.
16)
in the
names because of
their
St.
son in
Luke
compara-
majority of the
instances
less
(ix. 33).
This holds good also of the Strategi in Philippi and the Asiarchs
The author indeed mentions by name, when he can,
persons in authority among the Jews and Gentiles who appear in
his history (thus even Claudius Lysias, the centurion Julius, and
Publius in Malta Gamaliel is even characterised in v. 84 as ri/jnoi
the proconsul Sergius Paulus is called dv^p avveros
irdvTi Tip \aip
2
in Ephesus.
[xiii. 7]),
but the Strategi and Asiarchs did not come under con-
sideration as individuals.
127
On
them.^
it
strange that
also
is
whom he
list
of persons with
whom
St.
109)
p.
then
this
some other
first
Paul (or
(xii. 20),
Crispus
(xvii. 34),
i.
14
in later days
known
to the
first
readers.
They
are thus
named
named
for the
The treatment of
personalities
is
the
By
strict uniformity.
This supposition
at Ephesus.
is
same in
means
this
is
paralleled
Grammateus
128
in the introduction
speaking in unison of
St.
book
(St.
iv.
made
iv.
to the teaching
and
discourses of subordinate
35 Philip
characters
{e.g.
Silas
27 Barnabas
ix.
viii.
xviii.
in particular.
The speech of
St.
(x.
129
is
main
(xx. 18/.).
content
is
such as to set
As
it
is
it
somewhat
known
well
is
for this
words which
here
just
St.
as in
Rome
his
voyage to
consistent
It
130
It
scarcely
also
is
creative
How
from
is
the others
all
The
of St. Luke,
who
Peter
14 /. and
(ii.
iii.
strongly
is
and
facts themselves
ment.
fjLcvog
(ii.
as avrjp
oLTroSeSeiy-
22),
again as
7rai9
else in
Oeou
Traig
(TOV
''lr](Tovg,
the book)
13, cf.
(iii.
ov
yoi(ra<s-i
imparted to
speech
before
traits,
and
27
o ayloi
irvevjuLarog tov
poured forth, was first
Ascension (ii. 33). The
has
Cornelius
the
iv.
iv.
made
36), or
He had now
Him at His
ayiov which
26
iii.
and
first
(ii.
reminiscence
Christological
similar
(x.
38)
OTi 6 Ocog
fjv
09
/ulct
SiijXOev
airroi/,
emphasised
Xafieiv Sia
et?
avTov
(x. 42),
acpecriv ajmapTioov
primitive
doctrine.
Again
James,
Peter
St.
the
delicate
chap,
in
Are we
above
all
the
speech
from
how
any source to
clearly
St.
of St.
that
of
Luke
guide him ?
programmatic speeches of
xvii.),
the
is
distinguished
without
Hellenist
And
touches
xv.,
131
St.
first
X.
As
Athens, with
at
its
of ideas
is
St.
Luke
gives us
no
less
than
over, the
these
speech in
separate
Rome,
compare, morexxviii.).
Unless
upon some
tradi-
trust-
discourses
chap,
rested
132
into one.
If this, however,
be true then
it
follows
up one of those
the most inveterate
give
here
renounces his
own
principles.
CHAPTER
IV
exist therein.
summary
of the
sufficiently
ever,
commence
survey
oui* closer
Let
us,
how-
The
four
134
135
136
1
1
!
0)
a o
bo
CM
(U
^ -^
"-"r^
<"
.5
'"'
rt
:t3
.5 -
>->
0)
dj
.2
'2
a o
.-^
^^
^
a,
'S
ja
137
rt
22
.
O O
"
.2
_
^ 5 5..2^^^o
a
.y ^ 2 ^ ij ^
IS tS'S^-SM.S
i2
.X -^j^
> >
138
1
%
the
Paul's
Paul's
ap-
Lord
ship
Troas:
Macedonia)
(St.
(St.
/. in
23
on
of
of to
pears
vision
vision
man
xxvii.
xvi.
angel
139
140
MIRACLES AND WORKS OF THE SPIRIT
the
of
the
Lord
future,
daughters
of
St.
Tjrians foretelling
the
a vision,
in
Agabus
the
foretelling
who
Philip
141
the
future,
were
prophetesses,
a space
so small
In
first
Any
may
much
list
the same.
We
who speak
in
the
Spirit, cases
is
Here
in passages
which picture
St.
Paul in Philippi
and
Rome, we find only ten instances of a miraculous
character, and even these suffer serious reduction when
we consider that the earthquake in Philippi was a
in Athens, in Ephesus, in Jerusalem, in Caesarea,
in
and that
and that
their midst
occasion
St.
all
probability must be
seeing that
it
stands in
xxviii.
25
is
the
customary
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
142
introduction to a
ment
TO
TTvevjaa
We
TTOocbriTou.
sages
namely,
quotation
to dyiov
eXaXticrev oia
xviii.
9/.
9/. and
xxiii.
xix.
Now, however, we
xxiii. 11.
Only consider
the Apocalypse.
(811)
xviii.
TV<TV
TW
K^/cttto? ^e o
o'lKif
dWa
<f}oPov,
XaXct Kal
[xyj
crou,
iO-TL jXOL
eKaOicrev
^e
opdfxaro^
tov
t(J)
IlavXy*
firj
elfxi
/xera
Xaos
StoTt cyto
iviavTov Koi
C^aiTTL^OVTO,
(tcwtttJo-t;?,
ctol
eTriV-
ap-)(^LO'vvoLy(*>yo9
)(^LX[ap-)(Oi
avToov^ cKeXevcrev
/ULtjvas
e^
SiSda-KCOv
IIoXX^? ^
fxr]
cv
avTOii
yvo]ULvri<f o-racrea)?
Siaa-TracrOi]
to CTTpaTevixa KaTa/3av
UavXo?
vtt*
apTraarai avTOV
Ty
a>$
Si
kmova-Q vvktL
yap
(re Set
7rto-Tas
Odpa-et,'
ovto)
ov aTTOKTeivotXTL tov
MavXov,
/uli]T
(payeiv
yuT/re irieiv
MIRACLES AND WORKS OF THE SPIRIT
I
do not mean
it is
it is
the we-sections,
i.e.
143
by no
but
the author of
which were
at his
disposal.
In
illustrate the
which
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
144
telligible
his narrative where the colourmost sober are not the we-sections, but the
accounts of St. PauFs visits to Thessalonica, Beroea,
ing
is
and Rome,
here
is
is
visit), Caesarea,
Either
him
incredible
is
naturally,
altogether improb-
passages;
in Ephesus
shows that even for the second half of his work,
in those passages where he was not an eye-witness,
anything of a supernatural character was most welcome to him.
natural,
The circumstance
natural element
so abundant, indeed is
wanting in
no single chapter, is accordingly a proof that we have
here a body of tradition, homogeneous in its treatment of the supernatural, which had been transmitted
to the author in a form and with a colouring that
were congenial to his temperament.
That this form
and colouring belonged to the source itself- the question
whether it was oral or written may be left open
is
145
element
is
but
there
is
more
still
much
in
clearly
is
chapters i.xv.
stance
1.
chapters i.xv.
much more of
the supernatural in
For
in-
In the we-sections
under category
III.
all
that has
namely,
from the
common between
^'
been included
what
character
have
I
is
called
entirely want-
26
3.
xii.
we
find in
i.
10 /.
v.
19
viii.
Ghost.
The more
frequently
the Apostles in
146
5.
In
the
we-sections
the
wondrous cures
kol ol Xoiiroi ol ev
r^
Here no more
is
said
the
picture to ourselves
imaginable
*"
used
vrja-u)
ol koi
we are intended to
miraculous
power.
Or
compare
the
147
word.
the Spirit
St.
Philip
is
that
in the Spirit,
of the night.
prevents; but
must suppose
It
is
Tyre
In chaps,
this
Spirit speaks
xv.
tov ^iKiirirov
in the we-sections
how
and the
we read
(viii.
He
39) on
hinders or
of the so-called
first
i.-xii., XV.
to the latter
In xiv.
rw
repara
yivea-Oat Sia toov ^eipwv avrcou, just as in numerous
passages in chaps, i.-xii. and in xv. 12, while no
parallel passage is to be found in the second half of
pr}<TiaC6iJiV0L eiri
the book.
The
Kvplw, SiSovri
ctjjuieia
in ix.
33
Lydda
koi
respectively).
lame
The
man
in
iii.
Iff.
and
Jerusalem and
story of the
punishment
Such expressions as
man
ix. 8.
and
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
148
OL
ay.
7r\r]pouvTO irvevjuLarog
lULaOrjToi
(xiii.
52)
St.
the whole
narrative
which
accounts in the
first
is
characteristic of
from
different
most of the
It
is
is
not that
altogether
time
is
All that
is
narrated afterwards
is
narrated before
and
all
that
is
parts),
book.
than
St.
Luke
himself.
St.
eye-
MIRACLES AND WORKS OF THE SPIRIT
149
to suppose,
by several
may
help us to an answer.
critics
It is natural
is
and Aristarchus
so abruptly
Aristarchus, moreover
mentioned
and Gaius
in verse 29.
also according to
among
the persons
who
authorities for
what
is
here recorded
It
must have
The
whom
St.
and St. Paul. Of these, according to his own testimony, he had learned to know St. Philip (also St.
Paul).
That he was also acquainted with St. Peter,
150
Barnabas, and
St.
to be sought
is
among
the
among
St Mark, or
these persons
ingly probable
That he
Silas.
my
in
is,
is
to be sought
opinion, overwhelm-
for if St.
what
from these persons
could possibly have prevented him from seizing it ?
of gaining
Of
information
named
Silas is expressly
pleasing
This, however,
We
is
book (xiii. 13
we can go at
as far as
must, however,
now
in
xv.
37
ff.).
present.
The
the book.
question
If
we neglect the
instances of vision, of
word, we are
made by the
of the
He first
learned to
know
St.
Mark
in
Rome.
15l
first place,
these
who was
from
times
^ if,
however, this
theless certain
is
not allowed,
it
is
never-
was current in the Primitive Community; nor are the stories told in such a fashion
i.e, tradition originating in
that primary tradition
in such miracles
cerned
must
necessarily be excluded.
Moreover, the
remained
alive,
is
is
city,
intended to be regarded
of healing
there
is
now
left
only
Of
the miracles
the raising
It is
Tabitha from the dead by St. Peter.
inquire what really happened on this occasion.
of
idle to
It
is,
Notice also that each of the three accounts of the cure of lameThe first (in Jerusalem)
ness has its own distinctive character.
cannot possibly be broken away from the context, for it plainly
gives the occasion for all that follows (indeed probably also for the
outpouring of the Spirit vide infra). The second (in Lydda) is an
isolated anecdote leading on only to the vigorous extension of the
Gospel in Lydda and Sharon. The third (in Lystra) is presupposed
by the story of the apotheosis of St. Barnabas and St. Paul, a story
that could not have been invented.
1
152
TOirov eKKkrjcrla^
Xiraveia^
Trda-rjg
TroXXrjg
aiTrjora/ULevrj^
to
eirea-Tpey^ev
tov tctc-
aylwv.
St.
twv
woman
to
raised again
may have
life
again.
by that
believed that
It
is,
more-
is
fixed
Caesarea.
As
153
what
state
for it
it is,
kinds of things.
consul's
magician
It
is
is
won over
for
why
is it
time that
We
his patron.
is
pure
inven-
more
is
And
for
Here
also
we may at once
The
countless
Luke the
nature and
its
154
naturally well
known
There
to him.
absolutely no
is
two
and to
to analyse
is
an
in itself
sources,
Neither
artistic crime.
there any-
is
6 TOTTO?, iv
tov
diravreg
the ecstasy
<5
aylov
is
yjcrav (TVvr]'yiJLevoiy
transferred also
eTrXyja-Orjcrav
to the
place
where
KOi
The trembling of
Trvev/uLarog.
it
is
just
as
supposed
its
occurrence.
It
is
and
that
does
is
it
it
it
shows
Neither
i.e.
it
form
it is
entirely
elements in
l^co-Oai, (ru(rTX\iv,
Sida-rrj/uLa,
(rvvecjxiovridtj
v/uliv,
yj/ev'
(racrOai
Trvevjiiai yj/evo-acrOaL
[ol peavlcTKoil).
155
miraculous know-
been
regarded in
itself,
How
At
this
all
events
this
only
could
that
legend
have
is
been
not
created
one
by
of
those
later
generation.
On
Ascension
is
occurs in the
s.
382
ff.
New Testament
Luke
in St.
it
xxiv. 51.
but there
is
156
26;
xiv.
62; Rev.
xi.
12;
cf. St.
xiv.
14
Mark
ix.
xiii.
The most
on the Mount
The localisa-
/.).
salem
yet
it
is
left
by appearances
in Jerusalem
persistently ignored).
At
Luke
157
In his gospel
in exchange for a secondary tradition ?
in Acts i. 1 ff. he
he indeed knows of an Ascension
says in plain words that in his former work he had
carried his narrative down to the point where our
Lord was taken up into Heaven (see also St. Luke
but he only mentions the fact, he does not
ix. 51)
picture it as a visible ascension, he does not localise
it on the Mount of Olives, and he does not fix its
occurrence at the end of forty days, but on the day
These are all points wherein
of the Resurrection.
though
it is
occupied
however,
St.
the Ascension
now
it
is visible
Mount
158
with the
If it
disciples.
is
gospel, then it
St.
his
And
that the
first
yet
is
There
are,
Luke has
St.
for that
which
Yet, after
tology
twice
its
is
it
follows that
worse.
all, is
own
however, no grounds
Hence
this so strange
history
Has not
Chris-
its
history
the
first
recollections of eye-
have
happened "
gospel
perhaps
When
of Jerusalem
in
Asia
he
Lord according to a
recension
159
in
Jerusalem,
coincided in
It
type.
the
myth
and
sion,
Apostles.
small
in
which
and
Those who
Israelitish
the
genuine
Now
the
for
first
time,
World whose
appropriate finale
Therewith all earlier,
less unsatisfying, " conclusions "" were set
its
more or
aside.
It
is
first fifteen
although
also
St.
knew
Luke was
well
and
in the gospel of
tion.
these
and
160
It is
from
itself^
we may
rela;
but
The
at
all.
all
miracles of the
first
degree
The
miracles of the
so-called apocryphal
or third degree.
*
The
angels.
first
(i.
10/.)
is
insignificant
realistic
;
appearances of
men "
at the
The more
ancient form here is that St. Peter (not '* the Apostles ") was miraculously {i.e. by an angel) released from prison (chap. xii.). We
may suppose that such a wonderful [i.e. entirely unexpected)
release really occurred ; the details of the story vouch for this. It
was the general belief that every child of God, and especially
This at once
St. Peter (xii. 15), had his own guardian angel.
afforded a
even
we
if
means
read
it
we cannot suppose
in chap,
that
xii., still it
St.
"miracle" insignificant.
* The remaining miracles are connected with Damascus, Lydda,
Joppa, Cyprus, and Lystra.
stories of
161
so
the stories of
stories
may
CHAPTER V
THE SOURCES AND THEIR VALUE
If St.
is
is
So far as
and
is
con-
for the
and
Ga,ius
XX. 4
As
panion of
St. Paul.
It is in itself
upon written
sources,
is
162
163
by
the
sharply
distinguished
first
their
sobriety
from
most
thorough and detailed investigation has taught me
so "
Lukan
is
by the method of
linguistic
can be attained.
results
is
in character that
investigation
no sure
certainly distinguishable
The
""
the agreement
much
greater than
the difference,
sources.
ground
ences of style
it
investigation.
^
is found in the second half only in the narraBphesus and in the account of the voyage.
Local colouring
tive of events in
164
is
concerned.
All
St. Paul's
Hellenic fellow-workers, does not concern us here. The circumstance that Titus is not mentioned in the Acts would only present
a difficulty if Titus were so constantly with St. Paul, and so in-
his
own
THE SOURCES AND THEIR VALUE
165
means by which
it
was acquired
and
it
is
obvious
these will
suffice,
is
wider question.
Considering
first
Chaps, i.viii.
Chap.
Scene
1.
Scene
viii. 1, 4.
'ZiajuLaplag.
Jerusalem.
'lou^am? koi
at ^(JopaL rrj^
Damascus and
(Lydda, Joppa,
and
Chap.
1930;
Scene Antioch and
124. Scene Jerusalem (and
Chap.
Chaps,
1
Scene Antioch, and
Chaps,
32-xi. 18.
ix.
Jerusalem.
Scene
Caesarea)
xi.
xii.
Jerusalem.
25.
Jerusalem.
Caesarea).
xii.
xiv.
xiii.
the
28.
places in south-eastern
visited
Antioch.
thinks that he
of St. Paul
clear
Gal.
is justified
and
St.
from Gal.
ii.
ii.
(/Lierot
Bapv.
secondary characters.
justified.
St.
Luke's procedure
is
166
Scene
36xvi.
XV.
5,
a fresh
visit to
the churches of
Syria, CiHcia,
ends
in
xiii.
to
the ex-
Jerusalem
still
and to which
is
it in
many
instances returns.
it
proceeds
We might
the Acts in
xiii.
and
xiv., presents us
is
not so simple as
its
this.
The
horizon so clearly
Antiochean, of
because
Antioch.
With
is
xiii. 1,
//craj/
Se
167
ev
AvTioyela Kara
But
SiSacTKaXoi.
memory
of the reader
if
the
name
Paul to
is
nevertheless
even
if
we
D {crvvea-TpajuLiuLevcov
marks that the tradition here belongs not to Jerusalem but to Antioch)
for it is to Antioch that
the prophets come from Jerusalem, and the Apostles
depart from Antioch and return thither again (while
nothing
is
The
who
and xiv. 26
Thus all from
in xiii. 1 /.
/.,
and
in
xv. 1
ff.
and
xv.
27-xv. 35 is Antiochean
tradition, with the exception of xii. 1-24, a 'piece of
80-35.
xi.
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
168
who dared
and
so
closely as
it
is
with what
follows.
that
emphasised
first
in
Antioch
for this
is
expressly
Cyprus
and Cyrene.
Their names are not mentioned, though afterwards
the prophets and teachers of Antioch are introduced
by name. This, however, cannot be because they met
with slight success
for in xi. 21 we learn just the
opposite
but
of
169
by the words
They
are introduced
The
t^? OXly^ecog
word
SieaTrdprja-ap
pVT9 in
viii. 4).
in viii. 1
Thus
and
4
viii. 1,
its
narrative.
In
vi.
Among
{dvt]p
7r\i]p>]9
TTicTTeccg
Kol
irvev/jLaro^
dyiov,
again
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
170
24
;
:
avrjp
ayaOog
7r/(rT6ft)9), all
koi
TrXrjptjg
irvevjuLaros
ayiov
named with
koi
the sole
"
exception that
name
traits
native of Antioch
is
is
mentioned and
that the
of Nicolas
(vi. 5).
Thus two
necessarily ask
why
all.
we at once perceive
one way or another the
follows
controversy with
Stephen's
St.
(1)
all
the
Hellenistic
&c.
version on the
first
line
way
which
is
to Damascus.
is
and
his con-
it is
only the
But
for the
two others
with
this
is
vital
A dispute arises
171
phemy
Law and
eOr]
of Moses
is
put to death,
This
is
goal of which
is
from the
first
emphasis laid upon the circumstance that the Samaritans differed in religion from the Jews, but also this
story
is
itself
In fact, in
tell
viii. 4, St.
what he
is
about to
tell
us in xi. 19.
start to
He com-
mences with the words oi juev ouv SiacrTrapei/reg Si^\6ov, i.e. with the same wm'ds with which he commences
:
172
xi. 19.
ill
(SitjXOov)
em
him-
A.vTioyela^, he confines
phrase
it
Philip,
St.
to
digressions,
'TTpoa-ijXvTog 'Ai/rfo^eu? at
terised as such
as such
by the
It is
is
through-
own words.
But there is yet another consideration which makes
probable that St. Luke is here dependent on a
his
it
173
also
Law
is
quite obscure.
It
is
lies
in
TOVTOV
KOLL
oXXa^ei
would be quite
TO,
in
"^Itjcroug
a TrapeSwKCV
eOrj
It
IS/LcoVo-rj^.
which was
however,
it is
may be
all
the
1viii.
4,
and
Then,
xi.
19
The unity
of this source
consider
carry
well as
135, this
of XV.
events probable.
first
We
may
it is
hypothesis
seems
at all
in
174
namely, chaps,
i.-v.
viii.
5-xi. 18
geneous
As
is
may
all
say that
also
homo-
rest
Jerusalem
has
for
its
setting; but
In the
amination.
and
of chaps, i. V.
1% 3
1-24, really
xii.
first place,
1-28
ix.
belong)
has
Jerusalem
and
indeed
viii.
for
its
setting,
xxii.
St.
It
is
In the second
action lies
is
We
of
the stories
"A^toTOi/,
Trao-a?
ecog
KOI
of St. Philip
ofeo^o/xej/09
^IXitttto^
evtjyyeXi^eTO
evpeO)]
Ta^
eig
TroXeig
It is thus expressly
lasting
The
8, 9.
this
way we
are
175
that of chap.
further the
xi.
express, yet
formation
St.
18;
xii.
124
as
Caesarean
viii.
540
There
is
ix.
29xi.
rather as
and
Caesarea.
shown
tradition, or
It has, however,
Conbeen
otherwise
it
in
those
parts of
we"
is
does
almost
The
are concerned.
The Antiochean
traditions, as read in
whom
they extol
St.
Luke,
while St.
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
176
43, 46,
50
name
xiii.
13
ol irepi
St.
TiavXov
in
Paul stands
but in xiv.
stands
of the
of the
to St.
must characterise
StephenBarnabas
Saul.
it
In
up by
St.
Yet
{cf.
alsoirapa-
it is
no longer
field,
St.
is
177
Barnabas, and
In
its
references
and
in
James (chap,
St.
with Gal.
ii.
xv.),
who
St. Peter.
is
regarded as of
Here
(in contrast
9) all
of the two
By
178
filial
deference to Jerusalem.
and
later in the
closely
first lose
St.
anything of
conjunction with
its
part.
St. Peter,
This distinction does not, however, coincide with the distinction between tradition purely
connected with Jerusalem and that connected with
St. Philip.
tradition
The Jerusalem-Caesarean
29 xi.
may
18), concerned
tradition
both with
St.
(viii.
5-40;
ix.
THE SOURCES AND THEIR VALUE
is
179
similar traits.
xii.
1-24 must
necessary completion
and
ix.
29-xi. 18.
the narrative
to
As
of
viii.
5-40
more or
nised with
less clearness,
though
its details
investigation.
reads chaps,
carefully
ii.-v.
and
and chap. v.
17-42 are elements which disturb and obstruct the
flow of the
narrative
are,
in
fact,
doublets which
we at
first
St.
If
man
(iii.
the
which determines
;:
180
impotent man
ment
rests)
is
the
still
command not
against
the
God *")
of the people
The
5.
(iv.
5-22).
^
;
the
prayer
TracTi]^
ere elq
"ia<Jiv
ovojUiaTog
6.
^o?
T019
SovXotg
koi
(Tfjimeia
Tou aylov
juera
crou
crov, ev
tw
Ttjv
Tepara
rov
23 SO).
before mid-day
accompanied by
the immediate result eXdXovv
Directly afterwards
a kind of earthquake
Sia
yivea-Qai
7rapp)]aria?
X^^P^ eKTelveiv
thus
Holy
still
Spirit
further result
Tov Xoyov TOU Oeov juLera irapprja-la^i
they were all of one mind, neither said any that
ought of the things which he possessed was his
1
Thus
still
before mid-day.
too
many
Vide
1 Cor. xv. 6
THE SOURCES AND THEIR VALUE
own, and
Suvajmei
jmeyaXr]
tov Kvplov
OLiroarToXoL
01
cLTreSlSouv
hjcrov
Ti/S"
to
181
jmaprvpiov
avaa-raarecog (iv.
31-33).
7. Because of this grand spirit of self-sacrifice no
one lacked anything the appalling episode of Ananias
and Sapphira the great fear of the whole Church ^
;
(iv.
34
V. 11).
Many
Apostles'*
1-13).
Here the word iKk\riffia>makes its first appearance quite abruptly.
It is noteworthy that in these passages our Lord is four times
called 6 7ra?s GeoO.
It is possible to eliminate from this connection
the story of Ananias and Sapphira whether it ought to be eliminated is a question which, in my opinion, cannot be decided. As an
especially appalling instance of apostolic power it is quite in place
1
in the context.
182
2.
had
1436).
(ii.
this
which nothing
is
The extraordinary
3.
further result
success
3000 con37-41);
(about
(ii.
soul;
were
believed
common
and
also in their
feasts
in
favour with
4.
all
things
all
the people
The Apostles
(ii.
their sacred
heart, having
42-47).
by the
Jewish authorities [the Sadducees are specially mentioned], but are set at liberty
them
all
to go into the
The Jewish
them,
them
to preach there to
17-2P).
(v.
authorities,
Temple and
who wish
in the prison
to
condemn
being, how-
before
Here
St.
-^
because he
than men").
demn
The
of Gamaliel.
Apostles
(v.
changed by a speech
scourging and release of the
is
21^-41).
spondence becomes
the
first
common
still
more striking
so has
is
The
property.
if
corre-
we add
to
ance of
St.
night (chap.
the guards)
xii.
The
thinks).
and
first
it
also
recension
We
may
far
with
is
so
same occurrences,
so
that
has compiled
ible).
In
is
there
is
Luke's character as an historian quite excludes the hypoB is a free invention of his ; there is,
however, no doubt that here as elsewhere he has added his own
^
St.
touches.
184
In
to St. Peter
perform
to
everything
St.
man
explains everything:
the
(and
St.
John
?)
his
Apostle
And now
the enthusiasm
of the
first
believers
(the
what then happened was the actual, the histo7ical, PenteAnd though there is no speaking with tongues
this at least is not mentioned
what happened
then had the result upon which everything depended
eXaXouv tov \6yov tov Oeou /ULera irappfjo-lag and
Svvdjuii jmeydXr] dweSlSovi/ to juapTupiov ol dirocnoXoi
TOV Kvpiov 'Itjcrou Tt]9 dvacrTOLcreco^.
After the appearance of the Risen Christ to St.
Peter and to the Twelve (1 Cor. xv. 5) the cure of
the lame man was the next great stirring event
after
the two speeches in which St. Peter bore public testi-
cost}
iv
t^
<rvvir\r)pov<Tdai.
(ii.
1)
185
his
That this
birth of the Church into active life).
" Outpouring " should have shaken itself free from its
connection with this miracle and should have
its
ligible,
made
very intel-
is
in
B, in
may
in
is
in the pro-
development.
is
left to
the reader.
St. Peter, in
It
his dis-
In A, on the other
^
!
on the night preceding the outSt. Peter was cast into prison,
and on the next morning released by the religious
authorities
according to B the Apostles were cast
into prison after the " Outpouring," but were released
According to
By combination
of the
A as
of believers was assisted and confirmed by an earthThis created public amazement ; St. Peter then delivered
a discourse, explaining this '* outpouring " as being also the initial
stage of the " Day of Judgment." By this the listeners were cut
to the heart and under this influence many joined the new community. The great majority of them were Hellenists while the
natives of Jerusalem held themselves aloof.
little
company
quake.
186
night by an angel.
This release
during the
first
bj an angel
rightly set at a
much
time, and
later
is
recounted
wherein are
still
traits.
1V. 16
to
it is
Chap,
xii.,
and
1742 bear
v.
as to chaps,
however,
salem
and
xii.
1-v. 16.
iii.
ii.
chap.
Cajsarea.
These
is
xii.
iii.
belongs
one of the
(vid supi'o)
section
iii.
1v. 16
lepoucraXrijuL.
The
tion.
The
source
is
187
the account in
vi.
5 belongs
viii.
xi.
and a
records.
This
common
compilation
concludes
St.
charac-
events
with
it
the
James, the
1 So far as viii. 5
is concerned it must remain quite an open
ff.
question whether the Philip here is the Apostle or the Evaugelist.
The question is first settled in xxi. 8. The very attractive hypothesis
of the identity of the two Philips, for which support might easily be
derived from later tradition, indeed seemingly also from the gospel
down at this passage belonging to the we-secThe theory that there never was a Philip among the Twelve,
but that the name of the Evangelist found its way into the list of the
Apostles, so that he was numbered as one of the Twelve, presupposes a mistrust of this list which I cannot share, and which seems
The name " Philip " was very common,
to me quite unjustifiable.
and the confusion of the two Philips in the second century was not
only suggested by the name and the missionary activity of the
of St. John, breaks
tions.
Evangelist, but also by the highly probable fact that the Evangelist
had been a personal disciple of our Lord ; for we may well assume
that all the "
188
miraculous
of
release
St.
who now
Peter,
leaves
17
e^eXOayv
eiropevQi]
el<5
erepov
TOTTOp), and the death of the persecutor Herod in
Ccesarea.
This source thus comprises the first twelve
Jerusalem
(xii.
ii.
Recension B of the history of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and its conse-
Chap.
quences.
Chaps,
iii.
1 v.
16.
Recension
Holy
Spirit
and
salem -Caesarean
its
or,
of the
more
outpouring of the
Philippine source).
Chap.
V.
Chaps,
17-42.
vi.
Continuation of B.
1viii.
4.
The Jerusalem-Antiochean
Chap.
Chap.
viii.
ix.
540.
Continuation of A.
130(?).
passage
concerning
the
iii.
1 /.,
or
a question which, in
is
my
189
Chaps,
makes
first
it
possible to
of the
such criticism
at all possible
is
itself for
comparison
is
all
this is not so
(vide infra).
It
is sometimes supposed
however, more important for us
scanty as
is,
by
St.
St.
concerned.
drawn to the
Sapphira in
invention.
No
its
Of
main
course
what
is
is
notice
touched up by
is
St.
190
it is
St.
down by
shown in the description of
the great wonder-worker (viii. 6, 7), and
This
enthusiasts.
Philip as
is
also
modern
It has
been
suspected all sorts of things in the story of the relations between St. Peter, St. Philip,
its
it
Magus and
is
Simon
in the
is
Again, certain
thickly overlaid
its
principal features,
and
in
been invented
and
at
first,
we must
therefore conclude
of
manner of the
and
invented
it,
vide xii.
many
first
191
If
book
recorded
The
fact that,
according to chap,
xii.,
xii.
St.
an additional proof
this source comes to an end, and that we now
is
192
if,
we
lastly con-
specially
worthy
of reverential trust
consideration
it is
if
we take
facts into
all these
It
is
his
The mention
Papias expressly
Mark
that St.
work
own
the miraculous
xii.)
in
its
stance of raising from the dead (ix. 36/.) ; such fanciful tales are,
St. Paul says
however, very rare in the most ancient tradition
nothing about them. St. Luke may well have again met with these
daughters in Asia, and have then first heard of these accounts {vide
;
that St.
months.
there,
Rhoda
193
all
and that at a later time even St. Philip himwould have felt that any trace of opposition
between himself and St. Peter had been smoothed
source,
self
ff.,
and
I will
the Acts.
194
away.
mission
met
may
(viii.
14
ff.)
This, more-
the passage
little
of the
first
know that
this
St. Philip
As
for
may
be har-
Luke,
At
probable.
world
all
alternative
is
to me the more
upon the Gentile
developed
for
is
The former
settled.
195
must
therein
lies
though at the same time we must make the reservaLuke himself has drawn up the list of
nations according to his own discretion.
It is, on
tion that St.
chean
source.
its
Unfortunately there
is
no evidence
with
and we may
it
we may
safely
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
196
in
Stephen
and
his
peculiar "Paulinism
before
from
it,
The
Luke took
Gentiles in Antioch.
more than
St.
is also suggested by
For example, the narrative of xi.
1930 quite gives the impression of an extract from
There is difficulty, as is well
a fuller account.^
other passages.
The mention
Wellhausen also
and
{loc. cit., s.
is
/.,
an imitation of
vi. 9.
As he
rightly
x.
lead him to assert that St. Barnabas in all likelihood himself belonged to the fugitive Hellenists, that the representation of him as
the inspector from Jerusalem" is due to tendency, that the
Hellenists on principle would have confined their mission simply to
197
30^
xii. 25).
narrative does
If,
ii.
1 (^ta
however, this
the Jews, and that St. Peter is represented as the apostle to the
Gentiles I find it impossible to follow him. Again I cannot accept
his other objections that " the people of Jerusalem suffer from a
famine that had been merely prophesied," and that the same cause
moves the people of Antioch to help them, further that the delegates
by the
fact
folk.
evidence.
1
characterised as follows
Kdl
6.vedifX7]v
i.-ii.
TrctXii'
are
6.vi^T]v
Wveaiv.
We may say that he does not count the
journeys he actually took, but only those journeys that had anything to do with his relations with St. Peter and the rest or with
Kr)p6(xacj
iu toTs
into
It
is,
198
detail
unhistorical
is
it
in
The account
of the so-called
is
first
missionary journey
not so vivid in
92^.)
its style
nor
as the greater
Here
ties.
also St.
Luke has
source
originated
in
If this
for Gentile
St.
Luke
to pieces, one
does not move in generalities, but has given a fairly detailed reTo bring the collection for the famine -stricken
presentation.
Christians of Jerusalem (xi. 29 /. xii. 24) into connection with the
compact made in Gal. ii. 10 belongs to that class of combinations
which compromises historical criticism. The attractiveness of the
hypothesis lies in the fact that St. Peter is still in Jerusalem, while
;
according to chap.
xii.
section
this
it
only
shows
interest
in
199
leading
features.
It
seems to
chap. XV.
Antiochean
/jLevTjg
and from
oe cTacreoog Kai
^tjT^crecog
of verse 2,
it
and
yevo-
\\av\(a
tells us,
t(jo
and that
it
could only
was Antiochean
everything at once explains itself.
There was no need to record what St. Paul and St.
Barnabas had said at Jerusalem.
The whole interest
would be concentrated upon the attitude adopted by the
whole Church of Jerusalem, under the leadership of St.
Peter and St. James, towards those teachers of the Law,
who without authority (xv. 24 oh ov Siea-reiXdjuLeOa),
had come down to Antioch (xv. 1), and who belonged
:
to
the
(xv. 5).
party of
Christian
Pharisees
in
Jerusalem
those
men
who
first
preached to the Gentiles in Antioch could not therefore, in St. Luke"*s opinion, claim
200
but
St.
who
believe
Law
synagogues (and
is
accordingly assured of
is
We shall return
VI.
And
its
position
^).^
It
may
yet
it is
final
decision as
moment, we
Neglecting
it,
demands a
understood.
delivered
thus its rights were preserved. St. James does not intend by his
words to commend the positive side of the so-called Apostolic
Decree, but, like St. Peter, merely its negative side (fj.r) vapevo-xXeiv).
What St. Peter says and what St. James says could also have been
said by St. Paul, for even according to his teaching the Jews were
still bound to keep the Law
but it is important for the standpoint
of St. James that this is just the point which he emphasises.
;
St.
201
concerning Antioch.
authority one to
whom
It
demands,
therefore,
as
its
but we
may
well
202
authority of Silas
is
We
have
now completed
To
is
dedicated.
CHAPTER
VI
AS AN AUTHOR.
What we
We
group them according to the separate bodies of tradition into which we have already
analysed the book, more especially in the preceding
of examples.
chapter.
The We-sections.
1,
We
^y/xer?
It
is
abruptly introduced in
10.
xvi.
etV
el^tjTrja-ajuLev.
M.aKSoviav
evayyeXlaracrOai
avTOvg.
xvi. 12, 18.
riixepa^
The
relation of
ijjULepag
rivd^ to
xoXXa?
remains undefined.
It
is
XX. 7.
The avToh
after
203
rjiJiwv
is
inexact, seeing
204
that
it
they
tjiiei^.
XX. 12.
words
is
a change
of subject.
xxi. 4.
St.
revelation.
xxi.
8^.
so important
is
it is first
10.
xxi.
28.
xi.
xxi.
The prophecy
11.
meets
afterwards
with
The
Jerusalem
is
xxvii.
2.
Aristarchus
20 as a Macedonian, and
of Thessalonica
that he
Prolepsis.
/3).
described
as
Ma/ce^coi^
Qecra-aXoviKevg,
in xix.
is
it
in xx.
4 as a native
xxvii. 10.
c.
Inf.
the
Kv/3pvriTt]9
ol TrXe/oi^ey
and the
should occur.
eKaTOvrdp')(r]g,
Who
were they
205
xxvii. 21.
xxvii.
xxvii.
by Wellhausen as
xxviii.
clause
1,
interpolations.
It
2.
eireyvco/uiev
is
on
Prolepsis.
Again an instance of
xxviii. 10.
The
prolepsis.
friendly offices of the Maltese at the time of embarkation are mentioned too soon, seeing that this
embarka-
14.
xxviii.
Rome
arrival in
2.
We-sections).
Ta9
xvi. 4.
xvi.
his
Roman
xvi.
avTOv^
is
24.
Trjv
TrapeSiSoa-av avroig.
citizenship
23,
ig
iroXei^
Why
22.
now appeal
to
efiaXov
eig
(f)v\aKt]v
e^aXev
awkward.
had escaped or
not.
It is difficult to see
206
xvi. 29.
aiTTja-a?,
xvi. 30.
No
motive
is
jailor's rever-
their behalf.
xvi. 32.
family
the
jailor''s
unexplained.
is
35.
No motive
They
a-TparriyoL
is
issue
a sudden
command
for
the
though no hint is given that they were influenced by anything that had happened during the
release,
night.
The whole
passage, verses
2434
(inclusive),
irpos avTovs
though
by the
jailor.
xvii. 3.
Prolepsis.
The house of Jason is menthough it is not until verse 7 that we learn
that Jason had received the missionaries into his house.
xvii. 5.
tioned,
Xapovreg aireXvo-av
change of subject.
but St. Luke does not tell
y rayj-arra
us that the command was not carried out.
xvii. 18.
01 <5e is grammatically without antecedent.
xvii. 9.
xvii. 15.
xviii. 5.
The connection of
(ruj/e/^^ero
is
tw Xoyta
strange,
verses If,
iropevcrofxai is
207
xviii. 11.
iv avToig is
It
is
a Christian or a Jew.
It is not at once clear whether it was
Paul or Aquila who had taken the vow.
It is not quite clear whether ai/a/3a?
xviii. 22.
implies the going up from the harbour into the city
of Caesarea or the going up to Jerusalem.
xviii. 18.
St.
is
strange.
xviii.
2428 looks
like
interpolated.
xix.
We
1.
(Wellhausen).
xix. 3.
paTTTKTiJLa
The
is
a solecism which
is
It
is
not
till
now
it
may
whole episode
is
also
ajuL(b6~
The
recorded as
if it
in verses
18 y.
208
xix. 29.
Aristarchus
verses
xix. 34.
e-TriyvovTeg
xix. 37.
It
is
Kpal^ovreg.
Anacoluthon.
quite
phrase
is
incorrect as an epithet.
xxi. 20.
we expect
St.
James
The
still
it
had
wanting
xxi. 27.
xxi. 34.
avTOv
eir
Prolepsis.
Ta<s ^((Eipag.
avrou
Suva/iAvov
lULt]
209
yvwvai
cKeXeva-cv,
grammatically incorrect.
TO
xxi. 36.
xxii. 6.
of chap.
may
ix.
xxii. 9.
it
7r\rjOo9
irep] juLea-rjjUL^piav,
The words
xxiii. 5.
of St. Paul
ovk
^Seiv
on
xxiii.
The
111.
details
themselves and in conjunction with xxiii. 15 are somewhat strange. Here, just as in the first half of the
book,
St.
Luke
seems
to
have
followed
parallel
accounts which, because they differed from one another, he did not recognise as parallel accounts.
xxiii. 12.
The
general term
oi 'lovSaioi
is
still
son
is
introduced as a
well-known character.
xxiii. 22.
xxiii. 22.
xxiii. 24.
xxiii. 25.
24 connects
name of the
xxiii. 27.
Now
at the end
we are
first
told the
military tribune.
juLaOwv
otl *Pw/uLai6g
ecmv
is
either an
or
is
written purposely
210
30^
xxiii. 33.
xxiv.
evpovre^
xxiii.
is
5.
anacoluthon
by no principal verb.
xxiv. 17 is not covered by the
'Ao-m? ^lov^aioL
xxiv. 22.
It is
is
does
Christian
to be understood as superlative
This promise
xxiv. 22^.
to,
irepl
Koi
jULrjSeva
is
is
t^?
Or
aKpi/SecrTepov
strangely never
is
filled.
xxiv. 23.
movement
it
here
et^co?
rivh Se airo
Was
oSov).
followed
incorrect.
is
earlier narrative.
xxiv. 18.
rrj^
it
KcoXveiv
ful-
strange change of
subject.
xxiv. 24-27.
is
less
no
Se.
real dis-
crepancy here.
XXV.
4.
XXV. 16.
avTov
St.
T.
^e
TLauXov
grammatically
XXV. 24.
TO
xxvi. 4.
No
eTriKoXecra/jLevov
incorrect.
TrXrjOog
eveTv^ov
^e follows the
TtjprjOijvai
incorrect.
yueV.
xxvi. 14.
Discrepancy with
xxvi. 16.
Paul
is
the Gentiles.
ix.
{elaTi^Keiaav).
INACCURACY AND DISCREPANCY
xxvi.
and
That
20.
in all Judaea
St.
is
211
Acts.
xxviii. 17.
Tag
Sear/uiiog
e^ 'lepocokvjuLwv TrapeSoOtjp
^e?jOa? r. ^PcojULalcov is
e^V
bound
also inexact.
verse 19 ^
jiiev
without
in fetters
xxviii. 22.
25
xxviii.
is
Se.
ff.
3.
i.
Chapter
No
1.
i.
(ii.
v. 17-42).
juev
irpwTov
relative
Xoyov.
i.
i.
2.
4.
already at verse
i.
i.
6.
together
is it
4).
The
It is
4*^.
clear
identical
4.
is
presupposed
persons.
i.
18.
fxev ouv
without a following
Se.
120
:
;
212
i.
Here
17-20.
it
is
is
plot of land.
i.
22.
The words
ap^djuLevo? to
^julcov
are subject to
onwards).
It is strange that all the brethren together
24.
26.
iJiera
twv evScKa
aTroa-ToXcov
is
strange
stress
is
laid
ii.
4 ff.
It is doubtful
or hearing
is
"").
means all the Chrismust also here but already in ii. 7 only
the " Twelve seem to be comprehended under Travreg,
and this seems to be confirmed by verses 14 and 15
ii.
4.
Traj/re?
tians, so it
in
ii.
1 -Travreg
;
"^
{ovTOi
= OL
evSeKo).
city?
With tJ
8.
the speakers
ii.
9.
''
KaroiKovvTeg
oi
11.
Ttjv M.(ro7roTajuLLav is in
lepoua-aXrjjuL
e^V
^lovSalav
9.
ii.
wanting.
is
discrepant with
ii.
ISla
213
is
form
KaroiKovvrei ^louSaioi.
impossible.
J^prjreg koI
12/.
iravreg
erepoi
careless.
sion,
14.
i.e.
to the Hellenists.
is
related that an
21
The
tautologous phrase
to
a-vveSpiov Koi
22
and
init.
2224 seem
like
the editor.
V.
36.
Theudas
The
(also the
historical
mistake in
uera tovtov
reference
in verse 37).
to
214
4.
The Source
1-v. 16
(iii.
xi. 18
iii.
ff.
viii.
5-40
ix. 31-
xii. 1-23).
is
narrated
and 16);
but, according to ii. 43, many miracles had already
happened. The whole of ii. 4247 is proleptic when
compared with iii. 1 ff.
iii. 1
St. John appears as a mere figurehead in
ff,
as the first miracle (see especially verses 10
6 \a6<5
1.
been speaking.
Prolepsis
iv. 13.
and
iv.
KOa/uL^oi.
\aXovvTcov avrcov
iv. 1.
5 with
iv.
but
St.
3 (aupiov corresponds to
iii.
ea-irepa
26,
and
iv. 7.
verse 9,
to the Sanhedrin.
iv. lO*'.
cured
in
strange.
iv. 12.
u/xap
this is very
person.
iv. 1 6.
as
Weiss regards
iv.
1520
215
is
re-
Therefore
as an interpolation
by the
editor.
Here
19.
iv.
St.
gether.
22.
iv.
It
is
man
now
ap-)(^Lpig
koi irpea-^vrepoi.
iv.
iv.
iv.
but to the
of verse 26
thus
an interpolation.
iv. 30.
Koi crrjimeia Kai repara ylveaSai does not
fit in well with what has been said befgre, and looks
like an interpolation.
iv. 33 connects closely with verse 31, so that 32
looks like an interpolation (introduction to the story
of Ananias), or, since verses 34 and 35 belong to verse
verses
/3aa-i\eig
27 and 28 look
k.
ap-^ovTe<s
like
is
iv.
3637
it
It
is
216
The word
11.
V.
KK\i](ria
strange.
V.
14 looks
is
avroh'
and yet very natural case of anafroWoi tciov e-^ovrcov irvev/uLara aKaOapra
TToXf? T?? ^afxapeiag
viii. 5.
coluthon
,
A gross
7.
viii.
closely
like
e^Yjp'^OVTO.
viii.
14.
^ajuLapeia
viii.
16.
but
in
ii.
38
^airrli^eiv eirl
irpog avrovs-
tw
ovo/maTi
Tiyo-oi/
^Itjcrov,
Xpia-Tou,
viii.
17.
viii.
26.
ayyeXog
viii.
viii.
Kvpiov,
in
viii.
but in verse 29
39 the Spirit
it is
the
called
is
Kvpiov.
35.
25,
ix.
40
31.
evayyeXil^ecrOai ra^
The
Church
in
^Itj(rovv,
but in
KcojuLag (TroXety).
Galilee
appears
here
abruptly.
X. 10.
X. 15.
TToXiv K Sevrepov
X. 19.
Sit]7r6pei
pleonastic.
Weiss
sees here
an awkward interruption
is
necessary
The
2527.
cases
217
Weiss)
X. 36.
verse 35
remark-
is
ably loose.
39*
X.
X. 42.
T(p
Xaw
conflicts
with
i.
excludes
8, since it
The
X. 43^.
way
infinite clause
determines /uLapTvpoucnv
X. 45.
is
is
K 7repiTOnitj^ is superfluous,
quite intelligible.
but
its
addition
verse
refers
12.
SiaKpipavra,
difibrence, if there is
cf.
any at
x.
20
all, is
SiaKpivofxevog
the
considered by Weiss
the events).
is
and
report of
name of
Cornelius
We
xi.
12.
do not learn
brethren (vide x. 23, 45) were
that they accompanied St. Peter
xi. 14^ is more than a free
narrative.
St. Peter's
until
six in
now that
the
number, and
to Jerusalem.
reproduction of the
218
Weiss
xi. 15.
ap^acrOai
(x.
44)
15.
xi.
finds a discrepancy
en
XaXeiv and
/xe
between
ev
tw
possible this
refers to verse
is
14
6 oJko?
but
arou), so
really
it
that
all
in order.
with
X. 47,
summary of
xii. 3.
x., it
e/? ^corjv.
a'^yjuLcov.
parenthesis;
work
here.
xii. 6.
in question
was the
first
which
treated
it
as
before
the
intended
execution.
xii. 17.
the brethren
5 and 12^
xii.
17.
tell
etV
erepov
tottov
very
known the
strange;
place.
the
5.
The Jerusalem- Antiochean Source (vi. 14 xi. 19-30 xii. 25 [xiii. l]-xv. 35).
viii.
vi. 1.
the Hebrews
first
219
Hellenists
and
time).
vi. 1.
7r\t]0ui/6vT(jov
way of speaking
Twv
a very modest
/JiaOrjTwv,
numbers recorded
chapters ii.v.
vi. 1.
StaKovla
Tij
tij
KaOtjjULepLvi]
in
regular
this
something
quite different from the community of goods spoken
ministration to the needs of the poor
is
of in chapters ii.-v.
vi. 2.
OL SooScKa
vi. 2.
5) seems
to
still
14).
ii.
irXyjOog (verse
had
also
about
St. Philip.
vi. 6^.
The
vi. 7.
fit
very
weU
into the
context.
vi. 8.
(^vide
verse 5)
ripara
is
k. a-rnxeia
strange, especially
St.
Stephen
seeing that no
with him.
vi. 9.
It is
220
vi. 12^.
but this
is
subject,
but verses
vi. 12.
19 TO avpiSpiov (vide verse 15)
13 and 14 (6 roTrog ovrog), and vii. 54^., suggest
rather a pubUc place (the Temple-court) and the
action of a riotous crowd. This is still further suggested
by the circumstance
judicial trial,
there is no indication of a
and that the speech of St. Stephen does
verse 1 of chapter
viii.,
if it
13y^
is
vii. 4.
/uLerooKia-ev
vanishes if
we delete
change
of
subject,
vii. 7.
vii. 8.
eyevvri(TV
change of subject.
vii.
10.
Karea-Ttja-ev
vii.
816
(inch)
He
which
4* as an interpolation.
is
change of
subject.
and
16.
vii.
19.
TTOieLv is
The
construction
of
eKOLKoocrev
;
with tov
vii.
21.
rect construction.
avTov
incor-
The
51 y!
very abruptly
proaches, follows
221
we must suppose
omitted, and
something was
that
about our
said
The
vii.
now
(3) 59*
serve
as
and 60 look
the
like
since
(5)
TTcti/Te?
(viii. 1*) is
probably interpolated,
also
twv
vii.
60 or 59
must
inconsistent
the
irdptjcrav k.t.X.
Chap.
viii.
is
is
The
The
Trdvreg
is
Siea--
viii. 5.
is
evXa^eig
avSpeg
o'lKovg
an interpolation.
xi. 19.
xi.
20,
compared with
xi.
19,
is
somewhat awk-
said.
xi. 26^.
yjyrjiAaTicrai
change
of subject
is
to be
also the
polated.
xi. 30.
men-
first
2,
The
3.
passage from
subject
acpopicrare
to
of
the
verbs
aireXvorav
is
in
the
not quite
certain.
eJ-^ov Se koi ''Iwdvvtjv v7njpTt]P
xiii. 5.
what
comes some-
late.
It is
xiii. 8.
is
to
Perga
Mark
St.
left
returned to Jerusalem.""
perhaps a
xiv. 1.
xiv.
little
etV
7.
them
And
(in
consequence) and
too ingenious
T. (Tvvaycoyrjv r. "^lovSaiwv
KOLKci
evayyeXiCpixevoL
tjcaVf
is
pleonastic.
namely
in
hence
way
xiv. 8.
we
14 y!
xiv.
St.
223
?).
Paul and
St.
Barnabas speak
to-
gether.
22^.
xiv.
XV. 2.
named.
XV.
4!
27^
XV. 5.
all to
the previous
verses 5 /!
seem to
me
Neither can I
too ingenious.
community
XV. 12.
XV. 12.
who
7).
Note that
St.
Peter
in Jerusalem.
TrXrjOo's
It is true
tjKovov.
it
in verse
if,
as
is
probable,
from verse 4
verse 4
and verse
12]).
XV. 14.
Symeon."
XV. 23.
is
ypayj/^avTe^
anacoluthon.
^24
Brethren,
XV. 23.
i.e.
vjuLag is
avayv6vT^
XV. 31.
change
The
of subject.
par-
XV.
32 connects
30 that verse
Koi,
irapeKoKecrav
is
and
is
ovreg).
XV.
however,
position
avToi,
35.
iuiTa
Trpocprjrai
the narrator
back to
the
xiii.
word
ttoXXo/.
XV. 36.
XV. 40.
It is
it is
in opposi-
Antioch.
6.
Chap.
ix. 1.
ert connects
ix. 2.
We
tians in
ix.
ix. 1-30.
with
viii. 3.
viii.
1 for Chris-
Damascus.
11.
We
learn only
now
INACCURACY AND DISCREPANCY
It is strange
ix. 17.
in
viii.
had
It is
now
225
St. Paul.
forgotten that
it
fled
from Jerusalem.
ix. 26.
7n(TTvovTe9
jj-r]
now been
ecpo^ovvTO
in active
work
strange, see-
as a Chris-
From
this survey
crepancy in
the
frequently, ought
Acts,
of
the style
St.
constant appearance
Luke
so
as
his
in
strengthen
contribute to
they occur
that
seeing
For
the character
of literary
this
In
A we
KareXOcjov
read
etV
^ ^ajmapia
(iii.
rrjv
.
11) o Xaog
iroXiv
irpog avrov^,
Kijpv(Tcrv
eKOa/jL/Boi, (viii.
avTotg,
and
to
TrapeSiSoarav
(xvi.
TrXrjOog koI
e-^^aprjaav^ (xv.
36)
5)
14)
early rjcev
.
(viii.
drawn from
TrXrjOog
tov Xaov
jjloi^
see also
226
xix.
33,
10)
ei?
cvayyeXlcracTOai avrov^.
^aKcSovlav
In B (i. 24) a prayer is recorded, and it is left
indefinite which of the company said it.
(iv. 1) we read \a\ovvTcop avrutv, when St.
In
Peter alone had spoken; (iv. 19) St. Peter and St.
John are represented as speaking the words which
.
follow, while it
them
is
whole community
spoken
is
repre-
of
of grammatical sub-
new
all
and
irapeKXyjOrjarav
different subjects.
source in
26^
vi.
vi.
12 [uncertain]
vii.
4, 8,
10 ;
xi.
XV. 31.
Luke's style
227
and
In the
done).
too
late,
we hear
somewhat too
is
quite in
its
early, xxviii. 1
(xxi.
is
not
and eig
Nor
in xxviii. 10
little
late of
Mnason
too soon.
14 come a
drawn from
a written source.
late of St.
PauPs
Roman
We
and of the prophecies that had been delivered concerning the coming troubles (xx. 23).
The conclusion of xxi. 27 (vide xxi. 30) seems to come too
soon.
The name Claudius Lysias (xxiii. 26) and the
preaching of St. Paul in Judaea (xxvi. 20) come later
than they ought.
So also in B (i. 12) we are told
somewhat late that the scene was the Mount of Olives.
In A the age of the Lame Man (iv. 22), and again
the notice that there were six brethren
given rather late in the narrative.
(xi.
12) are
In the Antiochean
we learn that
Paul
St.
Mark was
5) later than
(xiii.
again in xiv. 6
ff.
Derbe
kol
a companion of
we should have expected
ireplyuipo^ are mentioned
jj
ff.
Lastly,
is
it
not until
ix.
11
that
we learn that
Damascus.
Cases of anacoluthon and of change of construction
have also led to the supposition of written sources,
but scarcely ever is such an explanation justifiable,
for they are of frequent occurrence, and are indeed met
in
with in very
many
authors.
we
source,
in xvii. 3
indirectd),
In
xxiv. 5.
(i.
In
anacoluthon {ypa>\favT^).^
and
am
is
many
In very
by omitting one or
connection is gained.
But
find that
incorrect both in
this
vii.
we
is
not surprising
21 (Antiochean source)
in
{vide
passages
but this
is
unimportant.
229
care-
put
in practice their
It is possible that in
tation.
some
cases interpolation
may
omit
omit
24-34;
xvi.
In B,
22-24 is easily
awkward before iv.
V.
xviii.
i.
also
is difficult to avoid
the hypothesis that sources are really present); xi.
XV.
almost
vincing,
and there
still
Luke.
on the part of
Instances
xxvii. 2.
Alexander
(xix. 33),
and of
St. Paul's
sister's
(xxiii. 16).
In
(ix.
men mentioned
of the book.
Still
greater
is
the
number of
instances
is
not quite
inaccuracy.
given
above.
clear,
in the lists
instances of
discrepancy.
(xxiii.
26
ff.)
231
compared
14
^.),
Rome,
and
finally in
xxviii.
Such
VI f-)-
are,
moreover, to be found
in A (iv. 36 y.
5)
compared with iv. 32 and x. 42 compared with i. 8)
and lastly in the Antiochean source (xv. 40 compared
in
(ii.
9 compared with
ii.
with XV. 33
Under
these
many
self or
I.
by succeeding
The
of a diary, and
that
St.
possessed.
editors.
Luke employed
in
We
may
is
such an
a vague possibility.
21
232
26, 31,
If this
really so,
is
which
St.
Wellhausen has
this
conclusion, although
Lukan
in
style,
before
it
strongest
The
tions which
critic to
proof
indica-
own memory or as
own diary.
is
notes.
II.
The
quarter
not used.^
It
is
possible
to
in the last
xviii. 8
xviii. 9, 10
xviii. 24-28,
and perhaps other passages here and there, as later
interpolations, and xviii. 517, 1923, and perhaps
other passages, as abbreviations of a more extensive
But in xviii. 5-17 the former supwritten source.
position excludes the latter, and then the assumption
of later interpolation is by far the more probable,
although
cannot
The
hypothesis.
certainly
is
speak
section
otherwise
inserted
place.
it
even
in
xviii.
2428, though
favour of this
if
it
to pass over so
St.
could not
falls
whole work,
important
The
more appropriate
purposely brief
is
for St.
later
interpolation if the
and if after
good and consistent story were left
But it is scarcely credible that St. Luke
behind.
only narrated the imprisonment in Philippi in order
to show how proud St. Paul was of his Roman
verses were not so entirely liukan in style,
their removal a
citizenship.
Chapter xix. (the story of Demetrius) has been subby Wellhausen to criticism similar to that with
which he has treated chapter xxvii. (the account of the
Wellhausen here remarks " The original
voyage).
jected
234
source
here
Ephesus
The
St. Luke
trifle malicious but quite sine ira et studio.
narrative
and
altered
ready-made
it
up
the
has taken
with
so
little
yet
thoroughand
purpose,
suit
his
to
This is
ness that it still shows itself everywhere.""
and 37.
consideration
general
of
the
may
set
(1)
The
improbability that a
writer who, as
loss for
in
St.
of the context
(it
It
is
per-
(xviii.
and
in not a few
other cases.^
On
235
the whole
which
is
in
it
him open
indeed, leaves
to possible accusations of
need not at
it
Luke
is
all
excluded.
out of sight.
The few
historical misit is
possible to
a companion of
St.
all
hope
It
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
236
concerning
St. Paul.
Of
course I do not
St.
accommodated himself
to
them
in matters of religious
but
letters prevents us
to the
Holy City
visits
the Temple.
and
if
we here
receive
237
no matter whether it is to
not^
we have only to examine most
carefully whether this additional information is to
his credit or
In
the point.
my opinion,
it
stands the
and
test.
More-
the
all
question at
all as
Law,
in reference to the
As
were concerned.
made
There was no
for
own persons
Luke may
well
that
greatest stress
St.
upon
Paul
in
his
apology laid
that
with
very
with
Hope
of Israel
(xxiii.
see,
the
He
loses
somewhat
in determination
and
in that consistency of
238
and too
abstract.
is
first
basis of faults
Passing to chapter
i.
half.
B (chap,
V.
We
can, however,
text.
editorial touches
clusions
word
r}
upon the
of Judas), as well as upon the grammatical and practical difficulties that are to be found in the verses
21^'
'',
The
22.
polation
latter verses
though we
are by
may be
a later inter-
no means forced to
this
conclusion
239
more
it
distinct
from
one another.
all clear
the Spirit
Christians
fell
;
it is
all the
not clear what became of the natives
But to attempt to
clear
away
ton
so
is
the editor
much more
is
always a simple-
difficulty.
It
is
point
is
ever
kept in view.
itself
and de-
240
quite clearly
Luke
nor were
How much
himself.^
St.
Luke could
his narrative
the context.
by
the
ordinary
motives,
side.^
and
Here
style
is
of
also it
is
narrative
Accordingly
B may
It
pass as a
is,
however,
It is characteristic of
by no means few of
he
WRITTEN OR ORAL SOURCES
*lpovcra\r]/uL KaTOLKOvvTe<i ''lovSaioi,
Ml
siipra),
verse 14)
Or
is
this only
i.
The account
history.
of the Ascension
is
quite useless
iv.
31.
of the imprisonment of the Apostles and their miraculous release (v. 17 ^.) is a doublet of iv. 1 ff. and
xii., because here all the Apostles have taken the place
of
St.
Peter.
Finally,
not increased by
happened
its
profession to
know
is
exactly what
Gamaliel).
theory that
(the Jeru-
The name
may
which
(2)
St.
The
scene of
ff.
iii. iv.).
iv.
242
25-31.
(5) Chap. iv. 32 presents difficulties in both form
and subject-matter, and does not agree with iv. 36 /.
the same remark applies to iv. 34/.
is
best explained
The
expression
xii.
17:
eiropevOrj
ek erepov
WRITTEN OR ORAL SOURCES
upon a written document.
As
iii., iv., and chap. xii.
passage,
it
is
So,
above
all,
243
for chaps,
name of
St.
Note
also that
it
is
an important point
is
called 6
vah
"
244
This body of
own
ministry, but
was made up of reminiscences concerning
St. Peter (and for these St. Mark also comes under
consideration).
What was written can, however,
scarcely have been written in Greek, but must have
been composed in the Aramaic tongue for the Lukan
vocabulary and style can be traced into the most
intimate details of the narratives, while from the
syntax of the sentences, and from many turns of
phraseology, we may conclude that the original was
tradition referred to St. Philip's
above
all it
'perhaps Semitic.
WRITTEN OR ORAL SOURCES
not
were
Cornelius
related
as
245
leading
stages
up
way
which
in
St.
PhiHp.^
It
was only
history
that
stages.
may
first
xii.
tradition.
V. It
investigation of the
source
XV.
19-30;
xi.
xii.
25
[xiii.
1]-
source
siderations
The abrupt
indeed in which
Note
afresh.
and
4;
35).
(1)
1-viii.
(vi.
extensive Jerusalem-Antiochean
it
fashion in which
it
begins everywhere,
begins at
when
it
vi. 1,
starts
viii.
xi. 19.
(2) Certain
terminological
The
and other
exist
first
between
differences,
it
and the
The
its
conclusion seems to
extract
consideration that
ix.
hand
records.
^ For this very reason the ordinary objections that are advanced
against an historical nucleus in the story of Cornelius fall to the
ground.
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
246
The
(5)
ment up to a climax which can be traced throughand distinguishes all the passages assigned to this
out,
source.
The
(7)
"
seven,"" plays
no part
here,
though
his
name
is
men-
tioned.
The
(8)
can
St.
but
is
St. Paul,
(11)
The
is
discrepant
and editing^
least
of this source,
too sharp attack upon the Temple and " the customs delivered by
Moses" would
reverence.
also to St.
in
247
itself felt
A.
body of tradition
and considering the subject-matter and the relations
that existed between himself and St. Paul, what more
likely person could we imagine
it follows that in
this case also we may suppose that oral information
was helped out by written notes.
Such a solution of
If Silas was the authority for this
but
Luke has
how
am
shall
to give his
far
from holding
it
as certain.
St.
vindication
of the
little
on " St. Felix and Kegula in Spain " I read (pp. 6/.) as follows " If
any one had anywhere read that in the third decade of this century a
:
pupil of the public school of Aarau, the son of one Triimpi, a pastor in
Schwanden [Canton Glarus], was drowned near Aarau when bathing in the Aar, and had afterwards read somewhere else that in
1837 one Balthasar Leuzinger, son of M. Leuziuger, the pastor
Schwanden, was drowned when bathing in the Aar close to
Aarau, if the reader were at all of a critical turn of mind he would
assuredly have drawn the conclusion that one and the same occurAnd yet it
rence was evidently referred to in each case.
actually happened that two young natives of Glarus, both of them
sons of a pastor of Schwanden, were drowned in the neighbourin
248
We
filling
up
Without
this source
we should
its
Jerusalem.
Our concern
is
trustworthiness
the
in a position to
make
no
inquiries
i.e.
1 It must not, of course, be forgotten that other points of difference exist between Gal. ii. and Acts xv. The most glaring are
these that, in the Acts, the Apostles seem from the first to have
stood upon the side of freedom, and that St. Paul is not represented as standing on an equality with them, indeed they seem
rather to form a court of higher instance. But this is partly
only appearance. Even according to the Acts the conversion of
Cornelius did not have the result that the Apostles now became
missionaries to the Gentiles, or in plain terms, recognised the
Mission (St. Luke makes them refer to the story of Cornelius as
an event that had happened long ago), and even from the Acts
one can see clearly enough that it was the account which St.
Barnabas and St. Paul gave of the success of their mission that
led to the final decision. If, however, St. Paul, when compared
if it
249
contained a general
is
ii.
the
It
the Decree
if
is
is,
accordingly, unhistorical.
But
is
in
and
St.
real
result
of the
we
WvecLv
CIS Kcpov Tfiix^ ^ idpafJLov.
fjLT] TTws
not so very different from the impression which
Iv Tois
is
Acts.
1
And
ii.
11^.
This after
is
all
given by the
250
to
it
but
decrees
The same
who formed
his
authority.
Now
it
is
well
is
K, Preuss. Jkad.
widely accepted
tradition
idols,
d.
Wiss., 2.
which
is
Marz
here
know,
prohibited certain
and
was a sum-
mary of Jewish
from
1899.
now, so far as
ethical
catechetics
it
(the abstaining
from
which ye would not
that others should do to you, even so do it not to
them "). In this article I attempted to prove a
position which up to that time I had agreed with
almost every one in accepting, namely, that the first
of these two forms of the Decree (we may call it the
Eastern form and that of the Uncials) was the original,
and that the second form (we may call it that of the
murder and
fornication, "
and
all
251
interpolation.
and
may
Veritas!
still
am
first
I have arrived at
not fond of correcting
time
but magis arnica
Besides, the
stands firm.
excellent
and exhaustive
AposteldeJcret
s. 19
that the word itvlktov did not
ff.),
belong to the original text, and (2) the perception
Jpostelgesch.,
its
YiviKTov
its
fit
in
wanting
in
Dd, Athous,
Sahid., Iren.,
Porphyr., Gigas, Augustine (ep. 82, Specul. and elsewhere), Tertull., Cyprian, Pacian, Hieron, App. ad
It is combined
form one idea in the Vulgate [sanguine
stiff'ocato], and by Cyril of Jerusalem [a^/xaro? tti/iktov]
and by Gaudentius [a sanguine id est s^iffocatis'] on
the other hand, aT/xa is wanting in Orig. lat. in Matth.
with
al/jia to
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
252
and
in Methodius.
ively
proved
that TTviKTOv
is
(if aijua
in
afjULa
it
member
as a separate
only occurs
list.^
Luke, read in
its
As
soon as this
A'7r-)(earOai
wv SiaTrjpovvre?
is
recognised, the
meaning of
the Decree
simply
text
hut
question
no
longer
a
becomes
of interof
pretation.
The Western authorities (and D) have
made
it
quite clear,
by the
interpolation {oa-a
jmrj
But is this
Luke ? Resch and
meaning intended by
St.
fxrj
iroieiv),
already
It is also in
insertion of the
which
is
rid Weiss in
9, s. 37/*.].
If irvt.KTSv stood
this
It is
interpolated.
That
before
Hilgenfeld
mative, in opposition to
have answered
258
in the affir-
What
other scholars.
all
support, then, can be found for the usual interpretairviKTov does not
in
certainly
and of
of meats
tion (prohibition
fornication), if
the
context
of
Acts
the
Nothing
whether
one
nor in
of St. Paul.
the epistles
mony
testi-
ing considerations
(1)
Upon
not until
(2)
St.
On
The Revelation),
to
in
appears
idols
as
abominable
(3)
On
word
to in the
in the case of
Upon
elScoXoOuTov, it
aijuLa
may
is
referred
also be understood
it would seem
and obvious moral
commandments, and that the Decree must therefore have dealt with more special precepts;
(5) Upon the consideration that it is more probable
(4)
formed
in
course of tradition
commandments than
1
Ztschr./.wiss. Theol.y
App. Greece
et
Latine, 1899.
s.
C25 /.
1809,
s.
138/.; Acta
254
Of
has no weight,
first
the text.
stood)
and
ment
is
The
without
likewise
nothing to do with
force
for
third argu-
has
iropvela
need
therefore
eating, neither
m/xa be so interpreted.
Fornication,
it is
Lev. xvii. 4
xvii.
jxedov
Xoyia-OriareTaL
avOpcoTrw
alfxa
al/maTO^
Sirach xxxiv. 25
ava
koi
apro?
1 Thess. iv. 3
vavTb% etSovs
ava
ev KpicreL
Kpia-ecDg,
^wrj irrw-^^wv,
aijuiaToov, St.
Matt,
dir^ecrdai,
Pet.
ii.
11
avix^aGai
xxiii.
TroyrjpoO
Deut.
al/uia,
Kpia-iq
/mea-ov
eTriSeo/mevcov
rep
diri
airb rCjy
TrXeove^ia in St.
meats (though
Luke
xii. 15).
it
does
THE APOSTOLIC DECREE
alp.aTi
tmv
TrpochrjTwv.
last
arguments
30
Koivooi'o]
v rco
considerations whose
validity
shall
be
255
Tliere
general
straightway
tested.
it
deals
namely,
but only to questions of capital importance
It is
to Circumcision and the Mosaic Law as a whole.
most strange that in a single passage, and that a
passage so important, St.
in-
Fundamental
difficulty.*
* This use of the word is also found in the i^rofane writers {vide
We need no examples to prove that atfia, when
Resch, p. 42).
placed side by side with Idolatry and Fornication, as a rule means
"shedding of blood."
2 I omit the arguments
may
Christians
me
On
one has yet been able to explain satisfactorily.^
Murder,
of
Idolatry,
hand,
the
combination
the other
and Fornification
is
can
be
Judaism.
(3) If the commandments of the Decree prohibited
meats they undoubtedly formed part of the Jewish
Law but we read just beforehand (xv. 19 f.) that
nothing of the Jewish Law was to be imposed upon
;
the
Gentile
Christians,
seeing
that
(if
the
commands of
Law
this
among
still
the Jews;
Twv eOvwv
i-Tria-Tpecpova-iv
TrXeov eTTiTLOeaOaL
On
')(<rOai.''^
vjuLtv
/Bdpog)
and
this
''
aTre-
as this.
(4) It
*
is difficult
to understand
why
my
it is
that just
It
'
it
in its
four
more
special significance
ordinances
more
of prohibition of
meats with
iropveia is
to.
257
are described as
!)
how
ewdvayKe^), and
it
is
here no difficulty
if
On
the con-
presupposition of ev irpaaareiv.
(5)
The meaning of
Twv
first
is
to
Participation in the
feasts
is
simply
emphasised,
especially
The
murder
is
no force
for, in
the
first place,
formal, depend-
It would be otherwise if
enter into fellowship with yon "
is
Decalogue
the combination oi
Nothing at
but
we do not
all is
ii
intercommunion.
2 In the first passage where the Decree occurs in the Acts we
may assume with some probability that there is absolutely no
intention to prohibit meats. But the other passages must be
interpreted by the first, i.e. eidwXodvTov is accordingly to be understood as pars pro toto.
3 Wellhausen writes: " This for Christian Gentiles seems surely
too self-evident."
'
:
258
secondly,
children, abortion,
murder of
slaves, &c.);
thirdly, it
life
of one's neighbour.
15)
liiri
TZ9
viJiciov
John
(iii.
15)
we read
Tra? o
juLi(Tai>
Decree
Kcu
ol
James
proclaims (xxii.
(povi9
Kal
ol
15):
e^co
elScoXoXoLTpaL,
ol iropvoi
and that
St.
(bovevere kcu
X^rjkovTe.
sary to
when heathens were converted it was necesteach them the most elementary moral pre-
cepts.
says that
perhaps
as a rule
ecstatic
in
character,
great
general
i.e.
principles
of morality,
especially
in
in
259
is not to be found in the most ancient Chrisdocuments earlier than the Epistle from Lyons
and Vienne, and that there is absolutely no evidence
blood
tian
prohibition
The
flesh
Decree
is
of sacrificial
prohibition in the
But
The
feasts.
know nothing of
If it
is
of the Didache
reference
(8)
(vi.
3)
and
at any rate
is
in idolatrous sacrificial
this
made
rule^
the
(like Teiiidlian ^)
blood
of
Christians, so understood
From
it.
these considerations, as
yrj/uLcxTcov
it
seems to me,
it
ttvlktov at
iropveiag
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
260
them.
If this
accepted, then
is
everything in the
Galatians,
Epistle to the
and that
may
in
spite of the
Moreover, we now see clearly how the false interIn the course of the second century,
but quite independently of the Apostolic Decree or
pretation arose.i
This ttviktov
blood the sanction of a commandment.
(The transformation
transformed the whole Decree!
could scarcely have been carried out
oara
fxtj
if
been original
it
is
nir]
iroielv
had
document
like this
later generation.
and
*
very slowly
it
was at
first
superfluous to a
s.
new
inter-
151-170, to whose
The
earliest direct
of Alexandria
1261
is
correct,
then we
can close whole libraries of commentaries and investigations as documents of the history of a gigantic
error
What
ii.
concerning
meats
concerning Jewish and Gentile Christianity
concerning the " commandments of the Covenant with
"
The
who
first wrote
on the margin
of his exemplar, created a Flood which has for almost
two thousand years swamped the correct interpretation of the whole passage
The joy that the truth
has been at last discerned is mingled with sorrow and
vexation over labour that has been unspeakably great
the
word
little
scribe
itvlktov opposite
aiiJLa,
and
utterly useless
strated
is
whether
Gentiles
who
to
interpolation
to be sure,
is
Law.
intended
to
adopt
towards
them
the
in
future.
said
is
ovSev
irpoG-aveQevTO^''
eScoKav
ejuioi
koI
l^apvdfia KOivcovlag, Iva ^/mei^ eig to. eOvtj, avTol Se cig Tt]V
tjvayKaa-Qtj
TrepiTOjULi]!/,'*'' as well as " aXX' ovSe T/roy .
.
We
26S
strict
The Antiochean
source
is
and
St.
Luke
in follow-
companion of
St.
Paul.
But
critics
have
composed by
Luke.
logical conclusions.
EXCURSUS
LUKE (CONCERNING
THE EARLIER
HISTORY OF ST. PAUL, ACTS I.-XIV.) WHICH ARE CONFIRMED BY THE PAULINE EPISTLES.
THE
ST.
COMMUNITY
PRIMITIVE
AND
Forum
speak, the
passim Gal.
(2)
ii.
of the Christian
Movement (Acts
&c.).
Christian communities
Ka6\o\rjg
rrjg 'lovSaiag,
aSeXcbol OL
ol
KaroiKOvvreg
Gal.
i.
(3)
ev
ovreg
rri
Acts
Kara
xi.
rrjv
1:
ix.
ot
31
eKKKrjcrla
airoa-TokoL kol
'louSalai/f
xi.
29
ii.
ol
14<
22).
The
eKKXtjarlai
11.)
and
EXCURSUS
KK\t]<TLa
fore
(Acts
form
ix.
31
xii. 1
Gal.
265
I
i.
13)
they there-
in
and
ol
ii.
(6)
of the
fast
;
xxi.
the observance
to
20
Gal.
ii.
12),
and for this very reason St. Paul, even towards the
end of his career, was not quite sure of the attitude
of the Church of Jerusalem towards himself (Rom.
XV. 31).
At
(7)
13;
i.
vi.
2,
&c.
Gal.
Acts nor by
17; 1
i.
is
Cor.
St. Paul.
St.
avoids
is
it,
otherwise in
The
fact that
Pet. ir. 16
ol ixadt}Tal is
and
in Ignatius
[cf.
nation
(Acts xiv.
14
4,
1 Cor. xv. 7
Uff.
Gal.
ii.
The
(10)
the
viii.
9).
is
St.
Peter (Acts
ii.
(11)
Gal.
He
is
i.
also
^ We can discern both in the Acts and in the writings of St. Paul
the twofold character of the twelve Apostles as "the Twelve"
they were the leaders, but they also possessed the apostolic
character which of
(the term apostle
itself
is
had nothing
dividuals in pairs) ;
of apostleship to " the Twelve "
to
is
much
Paul and
as apostles side by side with the Twelve
St.
applied in the Acts to an individual or to inbut the process of limitation of the conception
Paul.
St.
(xiv. 4, 14).
to be found.
Moreover,
it is
ol
trpea^vTepoL
Jerusalem (xv. 2, 4, 6,
xvi. 4), while previously in xi. 30 (thus in the same source)
22, 23
they are introduced without the Apostles. It is probable that we
have here a very accurate representation of events. When St. Paul
and St. Barnabas came to Jerusalem from Antioch the Herodian
persecution had begun and the Apostles had taken flight. In their
place St. James, at the head of a college of presbyters, had taken
over the leadership of the Church of Jerusalem (xii. 17), and this
arrangement established itself (xx. 18) the rule of " the Twelve"
ol
airbaTokoi in
EXCURSUS
(12)
by
side
The Brethren
of the
267
i.
14
(13) St.
St.
side
17; xxi.
18; XV. 13 jf.; 1 Cor. xv. 7; Gal. ii. 9; Gal. ii. 12).
(14) St. Barnal as appears as the most important of
(and
therefore a hybrid,
Kal
ol wpeo-^vrepoi. is
none of the
six places
corrected it.
article " ol"
is
7r/)e<r/3i/re/)oi
" om.
" in xv. 6.
as
Wellhausen
referring
also
to
if ol
six, this
ol"
Tpea^iJTepoi
accidental.
James
from this
it is
of St.
and
Peter
Paul,
who
as a missionary
was in a position of
nate
i.
Timothy
(xvi.
according to 1 Thess.
1 ff.)
i.
while the
Timothy.
history of the
members
to 1
five
baptism
specific
functions of the
14
ff.)
here
and the
1
Cor.
ii.
38,
EXCURSUS
&c.;
Rom.
3;
vi.
Gal.
269
27;
iii.
Cor.
13/,
i.
17, &c.).
had
(21) Baptism
the
tcou
acpearig
ii.
23/
The
eXajSev aprov
(24)
XV. 1-3.
(25) In Acts
42,
ii.
for
this
importance
in
ii. 9;
1 Cor.
14; viii. 4, 23;
Philem. 17.
Gal.
vi.
(26) In Acts
ii.
i.
KXacrig aprov,
St.
xiii.
Paul's
i.
**'
20; 2 Cor.
5
of
also
compare
teaching,
x. 16, 18,
13; Phil.
the
stands
ii.l;
1,
iii.
7;
10;
are introduced as
summary
there given
of the Christian
articles (together
life
with Baptism).
::
270
fidpTva-iv
'TrpoKe-^eipoTOVij/uLevois
31)
these things
all
Holy Scripture
told in
(Acts
happened
41
x.
cf. xiii.
had been
as
fore-
which
St.
koi TrapeXa^ov
oihrm
In
cKetvoh ovrcog
e'lre
koI
Kr]pv(rcroiuLev
the
content of Christian
summed up
St.
doctrine
term "
in the
is
^ 6^69 "
/mov
Tag
not
;
unfrequently
17
in 1 Cor. iv.
ev XpicrTO), KaOoog
SiSdcrKCi).
ii.
but also in
ra
eifii.
vjULtv
Rom.
/nev
,
XV.
crrj/uLeloig
18^.: ou yap
KaT6iyd(raT0 ^pia-Tog
dylov.
ToXjurjcrco
8l^ ejuLov
ovSh
Ka\
ei
(Dj/uLeia
(rrj/uieicov
With
ek
tl XaXeiu
viraKoriv iOvwv,
wv ov
Xoyw
ff.
compare
1 Cor. V. 1 /.
cf.
Phil.
iii.
ck
yevovg
a1pe(nv
T^g ^fxeTepag
eyw
''la-paijX
kutcl
Oprja-Kelag
elfit
.
rrjv
e^tja-a
;;
EXCURSUS
^apia-aiog,
cf.
Phil.
iii.
5 /.
271
kolto.
pojulov
^aptaraiog
di.
58 and
i.
ix. 2.
compare with
Phil.
this
Gal.
i.
13
/.
Cor.
xv.
6.
iii.
2 Cor.
xi.
rest), cf.
Gal.
ii.
ff.
23.
Apostles there
he saw
11
(d)9
St.
cf Gal.
i.
18
/. (after
SiejuapTvpco
ra
irepl
ejuLov
three years
With Acts
ek
xxiii.
^lepova-aXyj/ui)
we
TreTrXtjpooKcvai to evayyeXiov).
.
In
the
Acts
St. Paul appears as the missionary
(36)
who laboured most in the Mission ; cf 1 Cor. xv. 10
2 Cor. xi. 23.
Kai kvkXcs)
27S
% Tim.
cf.
fjLOL
11
iii.
eyevero ev
'
toU
is
name
epistles,
and
so
is
The Acts
work that has nothing in common with
the later " Acts of the Apostles," and is not to be
judged by the standard nor criticised by the method
If we divide the remainder of
which suits these.
Acts i.xiv. into two parts, the first containing the
passages, the statements, and notices which have no
Pauline attestation, the second containing those which
are distinctly contradicted by St. Paul, we shall find
Only
that the latter is almost a vanishing quantity.
in making our division we must dispense with that
self-complacent method whereby from our own really
are without attestation in those epistles.
is
an
historical
EXCURSUS
273
made
to
right"
still
exercises a tyrannical
known
and the
and again proved
how mistaken it is to form hasty judgments concerning primitive Christian tradition.
Hence in the
case of an historical work like the Acts, our attitude
discovery of
new
authorities,
superstitious in those
days
Finally, the character of the vocabulary of the
Acts is also just what we should have expected in
one who was a companion and friend, but not a
dependent disciple of St. Paul.
I have already dealt
with this question in " Luke the Physician " (pp. 19^.).
gospel of St. Luke and the genuine Pauline
The
epistles
have in
liv. ss.).
^74
From
it is
possible to
ff.)
characteristic of
the
three
synoptists
86
for
St.
Of
Matthew, 37 for St.
are
also
Matthew
46
the 86 characteristic of St.
used by St. Paul {he. cit. p. 155), of the 37 Markan
words St. Paul has 19, but of the 140 Lukan words
We may then speak of a certain
St. Paul has 94.
vocabulary between St. Luke and
and
kinship in style
however, very significant; the
not,
it is
St. Paul
to the Lukan writings
nearest
stand
epistles which
Ephesians.
Only the
and
Colossians
are those to the
characteristics
of
important
most
and
general
most
of
his
preachsuccess
and
the
Paul
of
St.
teaching
the
ing had really made deep impression upon St. Luke.
Mark, 140 for
St.
Luke.
For the
rest
dependent,
Apostle.
still
He
remained himself!
The work
of St.
EXCURSUS n
EXCURSUS
275
II
St.
certain
riiMv
Trpay/jLOLTWv
according
to
the
tradition
Lord), no such
is
of
summary
i.
1 /.).
276
We
must read
as far as verse 8,
where we already
Luke''s
aim
in his second
programme
form of the
verse.
It
But that
book.
of the book
itself,
is
this
only to be
is
expansion of the mission even to Rome, in the Conversion of the Gentile world,
and
in the
We
hardening of
at once see
to be framed
was probably for this
reason that St. Luke abstained from giving such an
argument, though the theme of the book was quite
distinctly formed in his mind and kept well in view
throughout the work.
It
ST.
EXCURSUS
III
EXCURSUS
III
first
277
we
and
He
experienced,
much he regarded
shown
is
many
in
passages
24 avpepyol
We cannot here go into the
(Tiuiv Tr]<s x^jOcc? v,acov.
question of the importance and the peculiar significance which this conception of joy has reached in the
Johannine literature.
In the ancient evangelic tradition, and in St. Mark
and St. Matthew, not very much of this joy is to be
Apart from the references to the stern joy
traced.
because of persecutions (St. Matt. v. 12 ; St. Luke vi.
23), to the joy over the penitent (St. Matt, xviii. 13
of his writings, but above
Luke
St.
of the
44;
XV. 5, 7, 10),
Word
St.
Luke
13)
i.
iv.
we
viii.
very important
and
Mark
(St.
2 Cor.
all in
16
Matt.
St.
is
xiii.
20,
certainly
of the kind.
It is otherwise
with
St.
Luke.
In his expression
Indeed in the
alone that
we
New Testament
find the
word
it
is
in his writings
eiKppocrvvr] as well as
the
;:
278
The
birth of St.
disciples are
aTricTTOvvre^
airo
r??
(x. 21).
(the
xxiv. 41
womb
(i.
44),
(rwTrjpl julov
(i.
47),
born this
it closes
Xo.pu<s,
is
The
His Thanks-
seventy disciples
(x. 17),
in
and are
what not
(x. 20).
actions of our
he
is
(xix. 6),
is
filled
29, 32).^
It
same
the
is
in
In
the Acts.
St.
From
these passages,
Luke
likes
(ii.
26, 28)
to
kv d7aXXt((rc<.
a religious
light.
St.
common
kv
AyaWidaei Kal
6.<p{k6T7]t
EXCURSUS
Sia
TOVTO
yXcoa-cd
rjvcppdvOTj julov
ijlov
TrpocrooTTOv <tov
tj
279
III
here
we have an obvious
rj
fxera tov
parallel to
the
St.
Peter's
forth eats
disciples
41)
its
bread
ev
ayaWidcreL
Sermon
which hence-
(ii.
46).
The
among
(v.
the baptized eunuch goes on his way rejoic39) ; St. Barnabas sees with joy the work of
the mission to the Gentiles in Antioch (xi. 29) ; the
(viii.
ing
8)
(viii.
them
(xiii. 48),
were
feasts of joy,
in the
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
280
Even if
some forcing of the note, and even if the
though this
purpose was stronger than the result
still the purpose must be specially
cannot be proved
serve
among
this implied
noted.
Christ
is
ii.
14), &c.
In St.
Mark
Luke.
in his
works.
peace " as well as of joy
(i,
79
ii.
14, 29),
Though
St.
Luke has
also taken
up
and the
its
into his
close.
work
is
and
for
so
Though
Acts
it
EXCURSUS
in
281
III
in St.
Paul
word
in
ii.
29;
iv. 13,
Rome
St.
closes with
Paul preached and taught
cLKcoXvTcog
20).
Xapd,
and
o-corrjpia
lpi]vriy
the
found
The Acts
it is
7rapp>](Tia,
and
Trda-t]^
iv.
7rappt]<Tia9
29 and
Phil.
i.
in addition a-conjp
by
is
The terminology
we are
is
of secondary importance.
men
had the thing itself, and the thing itself was not
imported but was a fact of Christian experience.
EXCURSUS
ST.
IV
S82
men
what
is
it
and,
would
be
still
when "
fulfilled,
In this sense he
be saved."
remained a Jewish Christian.
Lastly, though his
demonstration of universalism and of the abrogation
of the Law is most profound, it is also most difficult
to comprehend.
Scarcely any one understood it, and
it did not make its Avay into the thought of the
Israel
all
Churches.
St.
problem
will
still to be solved
and so long as a man regards
important principles as being still problems, he will
not be able to commend his thought to others.
Only
yet
trivial truths
there
is
still
are successful.
thought in which
something to be thought out has no
left
Universal Christendom
Must not
its
simple exist-
Could a
special
Hope
for Israel
Must
it
influence.^
Kara a-dpKa be
Hope
of
reall
EXCURSUS
Kingdom
was
it
lies
in
IV
of
283
God ?
Finally
Law
which
could have
who kept
it
denied Christ
On
all
these
mind
until
Men
freed from
Law until
Law was
it
all
be spiritually interpreted.
In respect to the Jewish people, there could be no
settlement of mind until it was recognised that the
nation was not only
now
had never possessed any profor all the promises of the Old Testament
mises
and that it therefore
referred to the new nation
had absolutely nothing more to expect from God in
hardening, but that
the future.
it
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES
284
Lastly,
could
kind
be
regard
in
no
to
the
satisfaction
Old Testament,
there
absolutely
until
every
of claim
possession
its
shown
Christians.
reached.
St.
Luke
first leaf
pious observance
of the
Law
is
Temple
this.
The Jew's
{of.
and
are to
him worthy of
reverence,
and
it
thither.
It has
also
his
full
approval that
EXCURSUS
Luke maintains
authority
its
Christian or non-Christian.
IV
among
285
Jews, whether
This he makes
James
never done
It
St.
against the
which
Luke evidently
in such a way that its point lies in the announcement of the future downfall of the Temple. This was
a thing that St. Luke could not pass over, because it
had been prophesied by our Lord Himself. As for
self
St.
Luke understood
this to
mean
It
is
Yet
in sharp
least
The
in
Gentiles must
trust
for
Jews by birth.
by Faith
Justification
286
Jews
this doctrine
fell
the Law, and therefore, beside and apart from the Law,
still
quite righteous
self-consciousness of their
own
Luke may even give an allegorical interpretation of a passage in the Law, he still regards Law,
Temple, and Vow as what they really were, and he values
Though
St.
still
more
clear as
we
He
took over from St. Paul the theory of the predetermined hardening of the heart of the Jewish nation,
and he seems here to have gone further than St.
Paul, since he does not repeat the Pauline thought
that
still
But upon
arcoOrja-erai.
is
not sterner than that of
In the first place, the disparaging ol
is found very rarely in his
^lovSaioi " of " St. John
St.
'"*
writings,
1
though
it
is
idyei
x.
35
{iv iravrl
ovry
iaTiy),
EXCURSUS
them according
ties (vide supra,
Luke
i.
287
St. Paul.
ing," St.
IV
72-79
to their natural
pp. xxiii.j^.).
ii.
as a massa
differentiates
and
between
spiritual quali-
a-dpKa,
and
it
it
If St.
Luke
still, indeed,
the
called
is,
Lord ;
to
is still
secondly, the
the
He
is
certain
who
who
This
standard.'^
developed.
eOpij,
that
he and
is
still
his
un-
fellow
bound together
288
Law
'
final har-
They are
believed in Christ.
""
for
being
fulfilled,
and
is
whom,
and are
him an
object of admiration.
This attitude of
the Jewish nation
and expresses
time of
much
reflects
Hitherto
later.
rather
this
the
Law and
historical relations
St.
recognised,
Luke towards
St.
has
not
been
clearly
Luke has
But the
real situation
is
much
simpler.
is
no need of a special
now
It is
EXCURSUS
more
superficial
than
St.
Paul
IV
289
and more
Law
especially
of "
St.
John."
preservation
St.
In the interests of
it allegorised
its
own
self-
For "
iariy still
St.
17
cwTrjpia iK
t(2v 'Iov8aiwv
held good.
^0
and to
If the verbal
to
their
aid.
Lukes way of
In fact, we see
above
Book
where
walk in the very footsteps of
he follows the Acts
St. Luke ; with them the religion of the Old Testa-
all,
iii.,
ment
is
sense,
Testament.
EXCURSUS V
THE DATE OF THE ACTS
EXCURSUS V
Acts, but to
warn
critics against
291
It
well
is
known how
difficulties
Rom.
bur-
of an epistle, to Ephesus
questioned recognition.
In
my
Chronologie der
Lift.,
altchristl.
I.
(1897),
246-250, 718,
three in
number
all
Jesus;
(2)
concerning
the
Temple seems
its
of
detailed prophecies
Jerusalem
omission by St.
voehco (St.
and the
Mark
xiii.
14
St.
moreover, the
6 avayiyvooarKcov
destruction of Jerusalem.
Of
these three
know
absolutely
jecture as to
Unfortunately we
ire'jrXrjpocpoptjjuieva ev rjfxtp
irpay-
yuaTa," nor
Would
rjij.lv
ol air
ap-)(r]s
avTOTrrai yevojucevoi,
&c.,'"
pressed,
is
no
difficulty arises
therefore dispense
the prologue.
We
must
quite unsafe,
But if it
Luke wrote, so
hampered with
is
psychological difficulties,
that this
is
undeniable
St.
is
it
If stress is laid
that St.
EXCURSUS V
293
There
century.
(1)
The
my
are, in
way
if St.
is
Luke wrote
"
Ye
The
will see
my
face
no more "
(cf.
Timothy
is
thus
by their disciples or acquaintances. Does any one deny that Xenophon was personally acquainted with Socrates because his Memorabilia is such a defective work and betrays so little of the spirit of
the great thinker? Or does any one deny such acquaintance to
Plato because he has so drawn the portrait of Socrates with such
freedom in his dialogues ? Or must we refuse to ascribe the Life
it contains much that is of
questionable authority concerning the emperor? Need I even
mention the case of Sulpicius Severus and Martin of Tours, or of
294
explained.
known that
it
was an
incorrect prophecy.
(3) In the Acts the Jews never appear as oppressed
and persecuted, but rather as the persecutors. This
seems to me a very weighty argument
How comes
it that the terrible events which befell this nation
since the second half of the seventh decade, and which
also affected the Diaspora, have left absolutely no
!
trace
The
actually
nation.
(4)
EXCURSUS
ff.),
the
all this to
and brings
yevYirm
295
proclamation of
25
01) jmrj
irapeXOn
yevea avrrj
t]
a/xii/
av iravra
eo)?
The
supposition
is
exceedingly
ig
to.
optj
difficult
Tore
yet the
Again he
ol ev tij ''lovSaia.
Christians,
as
is
may be due
6 ava-
(5)
epistles in
the
Acts
is
easily intelligible
about the
becomes.
(6) In his use of the
word "
Luke is
Lukan writ-
Christ," St.
;
in the
ings
296
(as it
There
are,
besides,
certain
is
terminological
delicate
play
we
deci-
Among these traits I reckon the absence of the title " 6 /Sao-t\iis " for the emperor {vide supra, p. 36) the use of the name '* oi
fxadrjTai " for the Christians (not used even by St. Paul) as the more
solemn and ceremonious term {vide supra, p. 265) the application of
^
pp.
S4tff.),
and much
else.
EXCURSUS V
sion here
is difficult.
not been
^97
is
help a doubt to
just dues.
its
It is
intended to
not
difficult
to
lies
is
the
demand
for caution.
There-
Luke wrote
at the time
of Titus or in
+.0
leave
it
if
open.
convincing
CONCLUSION
The
which
is its
is,
I hope, proved.
rightful due.
It is
the majority of
its details it is
trustworthy.
Except
Primitive
the
distorts
its
Community,
representation
it
follows
no bias that
de$ Altertums,
'
'
CONCLUSION
events,
sufficient
299
knowledge to
Judged
from ahnost every possible standpoint of historical
criticism it is a solid, respectable, and in many respects
an extraordinary work and its author''s courage is
also extraordinary
the courage with which he ap-
justify
as an historian.
development.
Neither
is
tremendous gift
If the results that we have arrived at are correct,
it will be necessary to revise no small portion of the
history of the Apostolic Age as it is related by critics
of to-day.
A work like Weizsacker''s "Apostolic
Age," with its thorough-going depreciation of, indeed
contempt for, the Acts of the Apostles, will need
correction in many chapters.
Moreover, we now
learn that St. Paul ought no longer to be judged
so exclusively by his own works.
This has been done
by critics since Baur with a self-confident exclusiveness such as they are not accustomed to show when
in the light of that
300
especially in letters.
For
their mistrust of
indeed
still
more because
sense of proportion
would have us
think.
This has been already shown by Weinel, but
we may and must go a step further. The Apostle
will lose nothing thereby
the man who did the most
to deliver the faith in God and in Christ from the
fetters of Judaism, who recognised the Gospel as a
new stage in the development of religion, superior to
the earlier Revelation, and who conceived it both in
his thought and his life as a religion of the Spirit
and of Freedom he has nothing to fear from any correction of the impression men have formed of him.
And even if he had, criticism would have no right
to trouble itself about such consequences.
as his biographers
The
process
of crystallisation
of the
it
primitive
deals with
CONCLUSION
301
immediately followed,
circle
lies entirely
Yet the
comprehensibly speedy.
and
his
own personal
experience,
up
to
loses
and above
all St.
New
side
by
side
(lately
deceased),
302
The
and Zahn.
Weiss,
results
which
at
have
The
is little
drawn that
So
it
my
them to rehappen
in
prospect of claiming
may
actually
and
This attitude of
theirs has
their research
of the
made
that
New Testament an
critics
it
deaf to proofs.
They were
the Acts.
This
is
least
led to imagine
that every-
what
is
is
again
Ramsay
powers
learning,
at the service of a
great
CONCLUSION
Zahn cannot
303
that he conducts
Perhaps it
long and
its
it
has deserted.
the solution of
difficult historical
problems by extend-
by the
rejection
whenever there
is
absolutely no
and on
Catalogue
of
& N orgate's
Williams
Publications
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
THEOLOGY
PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOLOGY
MODERN LANGUAGES
BIOGRAPHY,
LANEOUS
.....
ARCHAEOLOGY,
LITERATURE,
MISCEL-
London
Williams
&
Norgate
LIBRARY-Continued.
Vols.
By
Paul Wernle,
Professor Extraordinary of Modern Church History at the UniRevised by the Author, and translated by the
versity of Basel.
Rev. G. A. Bienemann, M.A., and edited, with an Introduction,
by the Rev. W. D. Morrison, LL.D.
Vol.
I.
Vol. II.
Dr. Marcus Dods in the British Weekly " We cannot recall any work by
a foreign theologian which is likely to have a more powerful influence on the
thought of this country than Wernle's Beginnings of Christianity. It is well
written and well translated it is earnest, clear, and persuasive, and above all
it is well adapted to catch the large class of thinking men who are at present
seeking some non-miraculous explanation of Christianity."
;
The
Earlier
Works
HISTORY OF DOGMA.
By Adolf Harnack,
Translated
Edited by the Rev. Prof. A.
Series, Vols. II., VII., VIII., IX.,
Berlin.
X.,
XL,
D.D.
(New
7 vols.
los. 6d.
I.
Intro-
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
II.
Book
Full Index.
III.
"No
A book which
is
Prof.
Daily News.
of the time."
WHAT
CHRISTIANITY?
IS
Sixteen Lectures delivered in
the University of Berlin during the Winter Term, 1899-1900.
By
Adolf Harnack. Translated by Thomas Bailey Saunders. (New
Demy 8vo, cloth, los. 6d. ; can only be
Series, Vol. XIV.)
supplied when complete set of the New Series is ordered.
its
persistent effort to
"Seldom has
"In many respects this is the most notable work of Prof. Harnack.
These lectures are most remarkable, both for the historical insight they dbplay
and for their elevation of tone and purpose." Literature.
.
loj. 6<f.
"
one.
to
It will
.
be seen from what has been said that this book is a very important
translation is also exceedingly well done." Critical Review.
The
" We trust the book will be widely read, and should advise those who read
do so twice." Primitive Methodist Quarterly.
"Instinct with genuine religious feeling;
suggestive."
it
Glasgow Herald.
By R.
Kittel,
Ordinary
W.C.
It will
the History
Literary World.
"
It is
fail
in this country."
Demy
of Texts.
"We
"Nothing could be
New
"We
THE APOSTOLIC
AGE. By
lated
V.)
Demy
Each
8vo, cloth.
" Weizsacker is an authority of the very first rank. The present work marks
an epoch in New Testament criticism.
The English reader is fortunate in
having a masterpiece of this kind rendered accessible to him." Expository
Times.
"
No
"In every direction in this work we find the mark of the independent
thinker and investigator .
this remarkable volume
this able and
.
."
learned work.
Christian World.
.
...
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
6s.
Edition.
12s.
BLEEK
(F.).
Translated.
Rev. Allan
2nd
Menzies.
Edition.
8vo, cloth.
6s.
EWALD'S (Dr. H.) COMMENTARY ON THE PROPHETS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. Translated by
[Vol. I. General Introduction, Yoel, Amos,
J. F. Smith.
Rosea, and Zakharya 9-1 1. Vol. II. Yesaya, Obadya, and Mikah.
Vol. III. Nahfim, Ssephanya, Habaqquq, Zakharya, Yeremya.
Vol. V, Haggai, Zakharya,
Vol. IV. Hezekiel, Yesaya xl.-lxvi.
Malaki, Jona, Baruc, Daniel, Appendix and Index.] 5 vols. 8vo,
the Rev.
cloth.
30^.
M.A.
Translated by
12s.
JOB, with
German by
the Rev.
J.
I2S.
p. 18.
its
related in detail.
and the Rev. E.
National
Considered
of Israel, and
by Arthur Ransom
Life
German
M.
14 Henrietta Street,
LIBRARY-Continued.
36i-.
(Vol. I. only to be
ordered.)
set
of the
work
is
PFLEIDERER
Trans185.
ITS HISTORY.
(Dr. A).
PROLEGOMENA OF THE HISTORY OF RELIGIONS. With an Introduction by Prof.
REVILLE
F.
Max
Svo, cloth.
Miiller.
6s.
PROTESTANT COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT. With General and Special Introductions. Edited
by Profs. P. W. Schmidt and F. von HolzendorfF.
Translated
from the Third German Edition by the Rev. F. H. Jones, B.A.
3 vols. 8vo, cloth.
iSs.
INSCRIPTranslated
(Vol.
I.
With a Map.
8vo, cloth.
I2S.
(Dr. E.).
THE CONTENTS AND ORIGIN OF
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES CRITICALLY
ZELLER
INVESTIGATED.
Preceded by Dr. Fr. Overbeck's Introduction to the Acts of the Apostles from De Wette's Handbook.
Translated by Joseph Dare.
2 vols. Svo, cloth.
12s.
14 Henrietta Street,
"
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
pHce
varies according
size
to the size
A Few
Professor
'
'
Dr. John Watson " The Library is rendering valuable service to lay theologians
in this country, as well as to ministers."
:
in
the
'
Sir
Russell " I have formed the highest opinion of this series. Each
of the books is animated by a fine intelligent and at the same time devout
Edward
spirit."
Rev. R. J. Campbell
is
domg
" Your
'
is
invaluable,
and
Professor G. Currie Martin " I think you are rendering a most valuable service
to all serious students of theology by your publication of the
Crown
Theological Library.'
.*
'
Vol.
Vol. II.
An
Historical
MY STRUGGLE FOR
LIGHT: Confessions of a
By R. Wimmer, Pastor of Weisweil-am-Rhein in
Preacher.
Baden. Crown 8vo, cloth. 3^. dd.
Vol. III.
W.C.
lo
Vol. IV.
Vol.
V.
4J-.
WHAT
Professor of
CHRISTIANITY?
IS
Church History
By Adolf Hamack,
Crown
8vo.
Translated
^s.
By W. Herrmann,
Professor of
' *
The
^s.
NEW
Vol. VIII.
Plea for
8vo.
5^.
Vol. IX.
Vol.
X.
CHRIST:
Its
Religion.
By Otto
Theology
Vol.
XL
in the
Eleven Essays. By
M.A., LL.D., University of Glasgow C. F. G.
Masterman, M.A.
Prof. George T. Ladd, D.D., LL.D., University of Yale; Rev. F. R. Tennant, M.A., B.Sc, Hulsean
Rev. Canon Hensley
Lecturer
Rev. J. Cynddylan Jones, D.D.
Rev. G.
Henson, M.A. Rev. Robert F. Horton, M.A., D.D.
Hill, M.A., D.D. ; Rev. J. J. Thornton; Rev. Rabbi A. A.
Prof. Joseph Agar Beet, D. D.
Edited by Thomas
Green
Prof.
Henry
Jones,
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
THE CROWN THEOLOGICAL
LIBRARY-Continued.
XXL
Vol.
An
Anthro-
etc., etc.
Crown
8vo, cloth.
5^.
Vol. XIII.
W.
Rev.
JESUS.
Vol.
Gottingen.
Vol.
R.
W.
M.A.
Vol.
Guardian.
Vol.
in the
Svo, cloth,
^s.
XVII.
By Rudolf
Otto, Professor of Theology in the University of Gottingen. Translated by J. Arthur Thomson, Professor of Natural History in the
Edited with
University of Aberdeen, and Margaret R. Thomson.
an Introduction by Rev. W. D. Morrison, LL.D. Crown Svo. ds.
By
Pro-
fessor
Vol.
XIX.
Place
Svo, cloth.
4^. 6</.
W.C.
Vol.
D.D.
Crown
8vo,
XX.
Translated by the
cloth.
Rev.
J.
R. Wilkinson,
M.A.
6s.
" What is new and interesting and valuable is the ratiocination, the theorising,
and the personal point of view in the book under review. We study it to understand Professor Harnack, not to understand Luke and the study is well worth
the time and work. Personally, I feel specially interested in the question of
Luke's nationality. On this the author has some admirable and suggestive
;
Lake, Professor of
Leiden, Holland.
Vol.
8vo, cloth,
of
^s.
By
Vol. XXIII.
Vol.
Crown
XXII.
MENT.
Its
New
THE SAYINGS OF
D.D.
Being Vol.
II.
Crown
Svo, cloth.
6s.
XXIV.
of
ANGLICAN LIBERALISM.
5s.
"This
Vol.
XXV.
CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
By R. Seeberg, Professor of
Systematic Theology in Berlin.
Sixteen Lectures delivered before
the Students of all Faculties in the University of Berlin.
Crown
Svo, 350 pp.
5^.
III. of
6s.
In
the Press.
Almost Ready.
SPIRIT.
By Rudolf Eucken,
Professor
of Philosophy in Jena.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
demy
8vo,
Edition,
los.
35-.
6d.
Cheap Popular
per volume.
AND HISTORY.
BEARD (Rev. Dr. C). LECTURES ON THE REFORMATION OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY IN ITS
RELATION TO MODERN THOUGHT AND KNOWLEDGE.
Cheap
8vo, cloth.
6d.
los.
DAVIDS
IN
Lee,
2nd Ed.
1881.)
DRUMMOND
8vo, cloth,
Cheap Ed.,
los. 6d.
(Dr.)
3^.
Cheap
Edition,
6d.
Lectures on
(The
31. 6d.
HATCH
Lectures, 1888.)
Edition, y. 6d.
KUENEN
(Dr.
3rd
Edition.
8vo,
cloth,
los.
LECTURES ON
A.).
Cheap
6d.
NATIONAL
8vo, cloth.
10s. 6d.
(The
Cheap Edition,
3^. 6d.
2nd Edition.
8vo, cloth.
10^. 6d.
Cheap
Edition,
35-.
6d.
PFLEIDERER
(Dr.
(Hibbert Lectures,
Cheap
1885.)
Edition, 3^. 6d.
2nd
RENAN (E.). ON THE INFLUENCE OF THE INSTITUTIONS, THOUGHT, AND CULTURE OF ROME
ON CHRISTIANITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. Translated by the Rev.
(Hibbert Lectures, 1880.)
Edition, 3rd Edition, ^s. 6d.
Charles Beard.
Cheap
8vo, cloth.
10s. 6d.
W.C.
14
ON THE RELIGION OF
(P. LE PAGE).
ANCIENT EGYPT. (Hibbert Lectures, 1879.) 3rd Edition.
RENOUF
8vo, cloth.
IOJ-.
Cheap Edition, y.
6d.
6d.
los. 6d.
RjfeVILLE
^s. 6d.
(Dr. A.).
by
Wicksteed.
8vo,
Cheap
Translated
(Hibbert Lectures, 1884.)
the
P.
H.
los.
6d.
Rev.
cloth,
UPTON
(Rev.
C.
8vo, cloth.
LIGIOUS BELIEF.
cloth.
HEBREW
(W.
6d.
Demy
E.).
Theological Library, p. ii.
8vo,
6d.
ALPHABETICAL
ADDIS
Cheap Ed., y.
Cheap Edition, y.
los. 6d.
10s. 6d.
B.).
LIST.
RELIGION.
See
55.
Crown
Crown
Canon Wilberforce.
8vo, cloth.
J.
Moden.
8vo, cloth.
io.y.
6d.
ANGLICAN LIBERALISM.
Crown Theological
The
By Twelve Churchmen.
5^.
See
Library, p. 12.
ANNOTATED CATECHISM. A
and Morality, with many
8vo, cloth,
See
p. 13.
practical details.
IS.
PAUL,
2 vols., \2s.
p. 7.
CHRIST.
W.C.
p. 7.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
15
p. 13.
Demy
8vo, cloth.
"Creed and
Life").
Popular Lectures on
4^. dd.
BIBLE.
BLEEK(F.).
BREMOND
(HENRI).
lOi-.
See
7.
Medium
Svo,
dd. net.
to describe to us justly
and
man."
Daily
Chy onicle.
"
No
subsequent work can deprive M. Bremond's book of its great psychological interest
it is a work that, unlike many books on Newman and the
Tractarians, no student of modern Christianity can afford to miss." Pall Mali
;
Gazette.
BROADBENT
CAMPBELL
GOSPELS
(Rev.
IN
Canon
GREEK.
Estlin Carpenter,
J.
COLIN).
3^-.
6^. net.
M.A.
Crown
FIRST THREE
See Testament,
New,
p. 26.
CHEYNE
(Prof.
Including "The
Centennial Edition. 4to Edition.
T. K.).
See
Crown Theological
Library, p. 10.
See
Crown Theological
CHRISTIAN CREED
Crown
Svo, cloth.
31.
(OUR).
dd.
W.C.
i6
COIT (STANTON,
Ph.D.).
A STATE CHURCH.
"
its
interest
and
ability.
Criticises
Chesterton
G. K.
in
The Nation.
COMMON PRAYER.
Demy
Revision.
An
8vo, cloth.
32mo,
cloth,
is.
in
6d.
3^-.
MS.
of the
Crown
5^.
INTRODUCTION TO THE
CORNILL
CANONICAL BOOKS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT.
(Prof.
CARL).
net.
LECTURES ON SOME
DAVIDS (T. W. RHYS).
POINTS IN THE HISTORY OF INDIAN BUDDHISM.
See
The Hibbert
DELITZSCH
Lectures, p. 13.
Two Lectures
delivered before the Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft in the presence
See Crown Theological Library,
of the German Emperor.
5.?.
p. 9. See also Harnack, A., "Letter to Preuss. /ahrbiicher,'" ^p. 18.
DOBSCHOTZ
(F.).
(E.
VON).
PRIMITIVE CHURCH.
DRIVER
(S. R.).
DRUMMOND
See
Demy 8vo.
New Series, p. 3.
105.6^.
6"^^
Theo-
p. 22.
Litt.D., late
AN INQUIRY
INTO THE CHARACTER AND AUTHORSHIP OF
THE FOURTH GOSPEL. Demy 8vo, cloth, los. 6d.
Principal of Manchester College, Oxford).
" The book is not only learned, but also reverent and spiritual in tone, and
ought to find its way into the libraries of students of all shades of belief, as a
very notable attempt to solve one of the most important of New Testament
problems. " Christian World.
PHILO JUDiEUS.
14 Henrietta Street,
See
The Hibbert
Lectures, p. 13.
Seep. 28.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
17
Arranged as Private
Meditations before a First Communion. 2rid Edition, with a
Preface by Rev. J. Hamilton Thom.
Printed with red lines.
Fcap. 8vo, cloth,
EUCKEN
(Prof.
is.
RUDOLF).
Old
Series, p. 7.
EWALD
JOB.
See Theological
p. 7.
(H.).
See Theological Translation Library,
FARNELL
(L. R.).
Old
Series, p. 7.
THE EVOLUTION OF
RELIGION.
An
of Evolution.
FOUR GOSPELS
Svo, cloth.
GILL
By
(C).
cloth.
$s.
155.
2nd Edition.
Charles Gill.
Svo, cloth.
12s.
With
Dissertations in answer to
Criticism.
MS.
Trans-
by the
late
The Text
Richard Laurence, LL.D., Archbishop of Cashel.
Re-issue, Svo,
corrected from his latest Notes by Charles Gill.
cloth.
55.
HARNACK
See
(ADOLF).
Crown Theological
6s.
Library, p. 12.
W.C.
LIST-Continued.
LETTER
HARNACK
See
6s.
Crown Theological
Library, p. 12.
HISTORY OF DOGMA.
THE SAYINGS OF
See Theo-
New Series, p.
JESUS. 6^.
4.
6"^^
Crown Theological
Library, p. 12.
WHAT IS CHRISTIANITY
lation Library,
p.
New Series,
A/so
p. 5.
5^.
Crown Theological
II.
Harnack and
his
Oxford
Critics," p. 24.
IN
re-written, with
cloth,
25^. net.
ESSAYS ON
and HERRMANN (Dr. WILHELM).
Translation edited by
THE SOCIAL GOSPEL.
6d.
4s.
See
Crown Theological
Library, p. ii
HATCH
(Rev. Dr.).
CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
The Hibbert
See
Lectures, p, 13.
Ward.
NEW TESTAMENT
2 vols.
I2J-.
HEBREW
TIMES.
TEXTS,
2nd Edition,
Psalms. i6mo, cloth,
i6mo, cloth,
Isaiah.
i6mo, cloth,
is.
Job.
Genesis.
i6mo, cloth,
is.
6d.
is.
is.
HENSLOW(Rev. G.). THE ARGUMENT OF ADAPTATION or, Natural Theology reconsidered. 8vo, cloth, is.
SPIRITUAL TEACHINGS OF BIBLE PLANTS
;
or,
The Garden
of God.
THE AT-ONE-MENT
Svo, cloth.
Svo, cloth,
;
or,
is.
The Gospel
of Reconciliation.
IS.
14 Henrietta Street,
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
19
HENSLOW
G.).
THE SPIRITUAL TEACHING
OF CHRIST'S LIFE. 8vo, cloth. 5x. net.
CHRIST NO PRODUCT OF EVOLUTION. 8vo,
cloth.
(Rev.
IS.
VULGATE, THE
The Source
of
False
Doctrines.
work
other
HERFORD
(R.
TRAVERS,
CHRISTIANITY IN
B.A.).
Indices.
HERRMANN
(W.).
New
5^.
6"^^
Theological Translation
Series, p. 5.
See
5^.
Crown Theological
Library, p. 10,
and
HARNACK
(ADOLF.).
SOCIAL GOSPEL.
\s, 6d.
See
ESSAYS ON THE
Crown Theological
Library,
p. II.
HIBBERT JOURNAL: A
MSS., BRITISH
5) in Forty-two
Autotype Facsimiles, with a Transcription in ordinary Arabic type.
Together with Descriptions and Collation of that and five other
MSS. of portions of the Hebrew Bible in Arabic characters in the
same Collection. Royal 4to, cloth, gilt top. 20s.
(i.
HUNTER
(Rev.
J.,
viii.
DE PROFUNDIS CLAMAVI,
D.D.).
Large Crown 8vo,
cloth.
Cloth.
JOHNSON (EDWIN,
DOM. Demy 8vo,
\s.
55-.
net.
Church simply
6d. net.
M.A.).
cloth.
W.C.
'
zo
JOHNSON (EDWIN,
M.A.).
Crown
of Christian Origins.
8vo, cloth.
2j. dd.
JONES
(Rev. R.
FAITH.
Demy
2nd Edition.
3^'.
247 pp.
6a!'.
i8mo,
for Chanting.
ANTHEMS.
i8mo,
\s.
cloth.
\s.
Selected
dd.
Music.
to the
id.
8vo,
net.
155-.
Together in
vol.,
2S.
A BOOK OF PRAYER.
'
'
'
6s.
KENNEDY
See
(Rev.
JAS.).
BIBLICAL HEBREW.
vols.
7.
12s.
p. 34.
KITTEL
(R.).
New
vols.
Series, p. 5.
(Dr. A.).
LECTURES ON NATIONAL AND
UNIVERSAL RELIGIONS. See The Hibbert Lectures,
KUENEN
P-
13-
8.
LAKE (Professor KIRSOPP). THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS
CHRIST.
5^.
See
Crown Theological
14 Henrietta Street,
Library, p. 12.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
21
2 vols.
8vo, cloth.
21s. net.
THEDOGMAOFTHEVIRGIN BIRTH
LOBSTEIN(P.).
Haeckel's
Impression.
Crown
MACAN
MACKAY
8vo, cloth.
5^.
W.).
(R.
of
Fourth
Universe."
W.).
(R.
CHRIST. An
"Riddle of the
8vo, cloth.
MARCHANT
2s.
net
t,s.
Svo, sewed,
is.
sewed.
Svo,
2s. 6d.
MENEGOZ
(E.).
MERCER
By
E.
Paris.
is. net.
(Right Rev.
OF PROGRESS.
Crown
TO-
Svo, cloth.
EDWARD,
THE SOUL
D.D.).
J.
Being the Moorhouse Lectures
for
1907.
6s.
MITCHELL (Rev. A.
F.).
reset.
Crown
Svo, cloth.
2s. 6d.
" The lectures are marked by much insight and moderation. The book is
notable also for its gracious and cultured note, and for the quiet persuasiveness
with which a revolutionary reform is advocated.'' Sunday School Chronicle.
W.C.
MUNSTERBERG
8vo,
Driver.
(E).
THE AMERICANS.
HUGO).
(Prof.
See p. 29.
NESTLE
R.
S.
3^-.
CRITICISM OF
OTTO
(R.).
New
Series, p. 6.
Crown Theological
Library,
p.
6s.
See
1 1.
PERCIVAL
(G. H.).
Essays on the Spiritual Unity of Life.
Crown
8vo, cloth.
2s. 6d.
net.
net.
PETERS (JOHN
P.).
PFLEIDERER (Dr. O.). LECTURES ON THE INFLUENCE OF THE APOSTLE PAUL ON THE
DEVELOPMENT OF CHRISTIANITY. See The
Hibbert Lectures,
13.
p.
History of Primitive
Christianity.
Old
2 vols. 12s.
Series, p. 8.
4 vols.
24s.
See
Theological Translation
8.
CHRIST
Religion.
Its
3^. 6d.
Crown Theological
PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY.
8vo, cloth.
New
Library, p. 10.
Vols.
I.
and
II.
Demy
Series, p. 2.
8vo, cloth.
10^. 6d.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
23
PROTESTANT COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT. 3 vols. iSs. See Theological Translation Library,
Old
Series, p. 8.
RENAN (E.). ON THE INFLUENCE OF THE INSTITUTIONS, THOUGHT, AND CULTURE OF ROME
ON CHRISTIANITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. See Hibbert Lectures,
P- 13-
RENOUF
6s.
See
Theological
Translation
REOld
Library,
Series, p. 8.
RtVILLE
(JEAN).
Crown Theological
LIBERAL CHRISTIANITY.
See
4^.
Library, p. 10.
RIX (HERBERT).
With
cloth.
"The
is
is
Demy 8vo,
cloth.
5^-.
net.
A Sketch.
Crown
Svo, cloth.
2s. 6d.
SABATIER (AUGUSTE). THE RELIGIONS OF AUTHORITY AND THE RELIGION OF THE SPIRIT.
With a Memoir by
Professor J. Reville.
14 Henrietta Street,
New
los. 6d.
See Theologi-
Series, p. 3.
24
4 J. 6d.
SADLER
See
Crown Theological
(Rev.
WORSHIP.
Crown
8vo, cloth.
CLOSET PRAYERS,
cloth.
IS.
Library, p. lo.
Dr.).
3^.6^.
Original
and Compiled.
i8mo,
6d.
6d.
net.
"It gives thoughtful and acutely reasoned support to the great historical
student of Christianity who represents Berlin in theology against the pigA spirited piece of
tailed opposition which Oxford has offered to his learning.
controversial writing, it cannot but prove stimulating to readers interested in
modern divinity, no matter to which side of the debate their private prepossessions incline them. " Scotsman.
"Mr. Saunders writes with sobriety and with a knowledge of the points
at issue.
Readers of Harnack and his Critics will do well to read his
comments." Sheffield Daily Telegraph.
'
'
SAVAGE
cloth.
(M.
*js.
J.).
Svo,
6d.
(A. H.).
ON THE RELIGION OF ANCIENT
ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA. See Hibbert Lectures,
SAYCE
p.
14.
SCHUBERT (HANS
HISTORY.
VON).
8.
OUTLINES OF CHURCH
New
Series,
P- 3-
p. 12.
SCULLARD
(Rev.
Prof.
EARLY
5^.
See
Crown Theo-
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
25
p. 37.
CHILDREN.
2nd Edition,
Revised.
Crown
8vo,
cloth.
3^. 6d.
Crown
8vo, cloth,
^s.
The
hitherto
AN ATTEMPT TO
(Rev. JOHN JAMES).
ASCERTAIN THE CHARACTER OF THE FOURTH
TAYLER
GOSPEL,
especially in its
2nd Edition.
TAYLOR
8vo, cloth.
(Rev.
ECCLES.
C).
XII.
INTERPRETED.
5^.
3^.
Crown
8vo, cloth.
5^,
8vo, cloth,
3^-.
or 32mo, cloth,
is.
with Special
6d.
cloth.
2S.
W.C.
8vo,
26
Common
or 32010, cloth,
is.
TISCHENDORF
NOVUM TESTAMENTUM
70J.
GREECE.
(C).
8vo.
vols.
net.
CAMPBELL
(Rev.
parallel
2)S.
THE
D.D.).
Arranged in
Crown
8vo,
cloth.
6d. net.
THOMAS
{Rev. J.
CHURCH.
UPTON
(C.
B.).
BELIEF.
VICKERS
M. LLOYD).
Crown
Svo, cloth,
A FREE CATHOLIC
(J.).
6s.
Crown
Svo^
cloth.
3J. 6d.
WEIR
Thomas H. Weir,
in
the
Crown
WEIZSACKER
Demy
Svo.
THE APOSTOLIC
(C. von).
See Theological
2is.
Translation
AGE.
2 vols.
Library, New
Series, p. 6.
WERNLE
(Paul).
TIANITY.
Library,
New
THE BEGINNINGS OF
2 vols. Svo.
2is.
See
CHRIS-
Theological Translation
Series, p. 4.
THE ECCLESIASTICAL
(Rev. P. H.).
INSTITUTIONS OF HOLLAND, treated with Special
WICKSTEED
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
ALPHABETICAL
WIMMER
of
Library, p.
Preacher.
y.
See
^d.
ConCrown Theological
BOOK OF GENESIS
H.).
With
IN
a critically
6d.
BOOK OF RUTH
35-.
9.
WRIGHT (Rev. C. H.
HEBREW TEXT.
Readings,
LIST-Continued.
(R.).
fessions
27
IN
HEBREW
TEXT.
With a
new
criti-
Collation of
8vo.
7^. 6d.
Demy
8vo,
js. 6d.
cloth,
matical
Demy
and Gram-
Critical
Svo, cloth.
Js. 6d.
WRIGHT
(G.
new critically
etc.
H.
BATESON).
THE BOOK OF
Svo, cloth.
JOB.
on Scansion, Date,
6s.
IN
EGYPT ?
or,
Lost
"A
linen,
js. 6d.
Hebrew MS.
cloth.
Cambridge.
Med. Svo,
21s. net.
W.C.
28
IL Philosophy, Psychology.
THE
BACON
MAJUS"
(ROGER),
''OPUS
OF. Edited, with
Introduction and Analytical Table, by John Henry Bridges, Fellow
of Royal College of Physicians, sometime Fellow of Oriel College.
Complete in 3 vols,, 315-. dd. ; Vol. III. sold separately, 7^. dd.
5^-.
Crown
Svo, parchment.
4s.
5th Edition.
Svo, cloth.
pleted.
The
Synthetic Philosophy
Com-
2\s.
DRUMMOND
(Dr.),
PHILO JUDiEUS; or, The Jewish
Alexandrian Philosophy in its Development and Completion.
By James Drummond, LL.D., Principal of Manchester New
College, Oxford.
An
(S. H.).
Address delivered
sewed,
before
the
Aristotelian
Society.
THE
REORGANISATION
Svo, sewed,
(Professor
Reason.
OF
PHILOSOPHY.
is.
SIMON).
By Scotus Novanticus.
ETHICA:
or,
2nd Edition,
The
Dualism.
2nd Edition.
(Sir O.).
Religion, p. 21.
Crown
Svo, cloth,
Ethics of
Svo, cloth,
LODGE
Svo,
2s.
Address.
LAURIE
2ij.
HODGSON
ts.
Return to
ds.
2s.
6d
net.
See
of
Economic Dogmas,
Demy
Svo, cloth,
los. 6d.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
MUNSTERBERG
(HUGO,
Harvard University).
Edwin B, Holt, Ph.D.,
8vo, cloth.
PERRIN
Professor
of
Psychology
THE AMERICANS.
at
Translated by
Harvard University.
Instructor at
Royal
(R.
S.).
THE. A Review
EVOLUTION OF KNOWLEDGE,
of Philosophy.
6s.
THE PSYCHOLOGY
PIKLER (JUL.).
BELIEF IN OBJECTIVE EXISTENCE.
cloth.
29
OF THE
Part
I.
8vo,
4 J. dd.
NEW
F.R.S.).
Crown
INDIVIDUALISM
8vo, cloth.
2s.
8vo, cloth.
5^-.
SCULLARD
(Rev.
Prof.
H.H., M.A.,
D.D.).
EARLY
Logical Calculus.
Crown 8vo,
cloth.
5^. net.
Logic.
"
Its style is
14 Henrietta Street,
Athenceum.
30
SPENCER
2 vols,
(HERBERT).
demy
8vo,
With
AN
Portraits.
AUTOBIOGRAPHY.
Popular Edition,
"It is a book for all men and for all time. In its pages the thinker may
Here the poet will
trace, step by step, the sj'nthesis of synthetic philosophy.
find not only a worthy inspiration, but a possibly surprising vein of sympathy.
The statesman, the inventor, the litterateur, the man of theory, and the man of
practice will find alike, within the covers of these two massive volumes, an
almost inexhaustible treasury of interest and constructive thought. There is
suggestion and instruction for all the world, and an almost indefinable fascination whether it be due to the mere intrinsic beauty of the picture itself, or to
the dignity of its execution, or to the sense of its almost laborious faithfulness,
or to the combined attraction of all three." St. James's Gazette.
I.
Portrait.
7J. dd.
II.
and III.
The Principles of Biology. 6th
Vols.
Thousand. 8vo, cloth. Revised and greatly enlarged. Vols. I.
and II. \%s, each.
IV.
Vols.
Thousand.
Vol.
Part 3,
enlarged.
5th
The
VI.
The Data
Psychology.
of Sociology
8vo, cloth.
i\s.
Vol. VIII.
The
The
Vol. IX.
Vol. III.
Part 6,
Professional Institutions ; Part
2nd Thousand. 8vo, cloth. i6j.
Part
7,
Part 2,
Ethics of Individual Life.
;
Part 4,
3rd
Principles of Sociology.
Ecclesiastical Institutions
8, Industrial Institutions.
Data of Ethics
Vol. II.
Institutions.
2nd Thousand.
Part
Part
8vo, cloth.
Vol. X.
The Principles of Ethics. Vol. II.
Beneficence ;
Part 6,
Negative
;
Part 5,
Demy 8vo, cloth. I2J. dd.
Appendices.
Beneficence
Justice
i,
3,
Part
4,
Positive
14 Henrietta Street,
The
The
155-.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
Also
had separately
to be
SPENCER (HERBERT).
;
cloth
DATA OF ETHICS.
31
'*
First Principles."
Reset
Sewed,
2s. 6d.
3s. net.
JUSTICE.
Thousand.
8vo, cloth.
2nd
6s.
Other Works.
EDUCATION
io.y.
6d.
Intellectual,
Entirely reset.
Edition.
8vo, cloth.
2s. 6d.
ESSAYS
(Each
30J-
lOi-.)
SOCIAL STATICS.
"The Man
v.
The
State."
Svo, cloth.
VARIOUS FRAGMENTS.
Demy
Svo, cloth.
loj.
Uniform
Enlarged Edition.
in
Library binding.
6s.
cloth.
14th
6s.
Thousand.
is.
6d.
logical
Compiled
and
Duncan
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
No.
I.
English.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
iSi-.
7.
Hebrews and
8.
The French
Phoenicians.
Civilisation.
New
iS^-.
2\s.
30^^.
volumes in preparation.
W.C.
32
By
F.
Works.
is.
Four Essays.
Fischer,
Andrews.
By
and by E. Renan.
Crown
Svo, cloth.
$s.
Vol. I.
Svo, sewed,
4J-. 2d. each net.
Illustrations.
Vol. III. 1895,
1892-93, 100 pages. Vol. II. 1894, 124 pages.
no pages. Vol. IV. 1896, 141 pages. Vol. V. 1897, 105 pages.
Vol. VI. 1898, 105 pages.
WUNDT
OGY.
(WILHELM).
OUTLINES OF PSYCHOL-
14 Henrietta Street,
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
Oriental
III.
33
Languages, Literature,
and History.
ABHIDHANARATNAMALA
(THE)
OF HALAyUDHA.
at iSs.)
10s.
125-.
6d net;
cloth, 13^.
6ci.
net.
I.
8vo,
Sewed.
cloth
boards.
7s,
6d.
I.
Chrestomathia,
3^.
DELITZSCH
Lectures, p. 13.
(Prof.
ASSYRIAN GRAMMAR.
F.).
With
IN THE
Demy 8vo.
4s.
5^.
5^^
Crown Theological
Library,
p. 9-
DILLMANN
(A.).
ETHIOPIC GRAMMAR.
Translated
from C.
Bezold's
DiPAVAMSA
A.
etc.
(THE):
Buddhist Historical Record in the
Edited, with an English Translation, by Dr.
Pali Lang-uage.
H. Oldenberg. Svo, cloth. 21s.
14 Henrietta Street,
Translated,
under
Breasted, Professor of
Crown 8vo, cloth. i8j.
34
AN ESSAY ON ASSYRIOLOGY.
EVANS (GEORGE).
With 4to Tables
of Assyrian Inscriptions.
FAIZULLAH-BHAI
(Shaikh,
8vo, cloth.
B.D.).
5^-.
MOSLEM
PRESENT.
With
8vo, sewed.
4d.
vols. 8, 9,
Cunningham Memoirs,
See
ii, p. 45.
FRANKFURTER (Dr.
8vo, cloth.
FUERST
(Dr.
6s.
JUL.).
HARDY
ITS
5th Edition,
(R.
Singhalese MSB.
2nd Edition,
Glossary.
8vo, cloth.
21s.
HEBREW
TEXTS.
Large type.
Genesis.
{2nd Edition.
Psalms.
IS.
li^.
Job.
Isaiah,
with
complete
Index
and
i6mo, cloth.
is. 6d.
is.
STUDIES
cloth.
LYALL
IN
HEBREW SYNONYMS.
Demy
8vo,
5i-.
(C.
J.,
M.A.,
K.C.I.E.).
ANCIENT ARABIAN
Translations, with
los. 6d.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
35
MACHBEROTH
edited by V. Trenckner.
" Pali Miscellany."
8vo, sewed.
440 pp.
21s.
See also
A CONCISE DICTIONARY OF
(W.).
German).
55. net,
or
bound
(Assyrian-English-
Completed
in 19 parts.
Each
of
POETS
of the
SPANISH-
Mrs Karl
Albrecht.
Cloth.
NOLDEKE (THEODOR,
in the
University of
SYRIAC GRAMMAR.
COMPENDIOUS
8vo, cloth.
NORRIS
75-.
6d.
ASSYRIAN DICTIONARY.
(E.).
Intended to
further the Study of the Cuneiform Inscriptions of Assyria and
Vols. I. to III.
Babylonia.
4to, cloth.
Each 28^-.
OLDENBERG
BUDDHA
(Prof. H.).
His Life, his Doctrine,
:
his Order.
By Dr. Hermann Oldenberg, Professor at the
University of BerUn.
Translated by W. Hoey, M.A. 8vo, cloth
gilt.
1 8 J.
PALI MISCELLANY.
By V. Trenckner. Part I. The Introductory Part of the Milanda Panho, with an English Translation
and Notes. 8vo, sewed. 4^^.
14 Henrietta Street, Covent Garden, London,
W.C.
36
By John
RENOUF
(P.
LE
PAGE).
Hibbert Lectures,
See
p. 14.
SADI.
SADI OF SHIRAZ. A
new Edition
a Vocabulary, by F. Johnson.
cloth.
15^.
p.
14.
SHIHAB AL
din.
p. 8.
FUTOH AL-HABASHAH
or,
The
SOCIN
(Dr. A.).
ARABIC GRAMMAR.
Paradigms, Litera-
ture, Exercises,
Crown
8vo, cloth.
New
Edition in preparation.
Sewed,
is.
6d.
The
hitherto
Establishedfor the
purpose of editift^ and translating Oriental Texts chiefly preserved
in the British Museum.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
Volumes already issued
37
in
and
II.
I.
and
II.
84^. net.
Edited
in Arabic, Ethiopic, and Coptic.
and Translated by Prof. W. Riedel (Griefswald) and W. E.
Crum.
IIS. net.
contained
Edited,
in
Wright, LL.D.
i\s. net.
VINAYA PITAKAM
Scriptures.
cloth.
Each
2\s.
W.C.
RIG-
38
&
Modern Languages
IV.
A
complete
Literature.
list
cations on
be
had on
application.
Perowne, M.A.
This series is equally well adapted for general reading, and for those
preparing tor the Army, Oxford and Cambridge Certificates, and other
Examinations in fact, for all who wish to keep up or improve their French
and German.
The notes are as concise as possible, with an occasional
The books selected being
etymology or illustration to assist the memory.
by recent or living authors, are adapted for the study of most modern French
and German.
LE COUP DE PISTOLET,
"A book
VAILLANTE.
"
The books
Prosper Merimee.
etc.
2s. 6d.
be desired.
The
National Observer.
Jacques Vincent.
2s. 6d.
are well got up, and in Vaillante an excellent choice has been
made. '-^Guardian.
'
Johannes
v.
Dewall.
3^.
"Well
CONTES MILITAIRES.
A. Daudet.
make
the
2s. 6d.
"These
stories are
ERZAHLUNGEN.
E. Hofer.
3^.
"The series has brought fascinating examples of fiction under the eyes of
English readers in a neat and handy form. Besides having the military flavour,
they are models of style." Scotsman.
GRAMMAR.
BAYLDON
An
ICELANDIC
(Rev. G.).
Elementary Grammar of the Old Norse or Icelandic Language.
8vo, cloth.
Ts. 6d.
14 Henrietta Street,
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
39
BOlELLE
Gall,),
Clive.
3^.
See Victor
mouth.
GOETHE
2.s.
(W.
6d.
v.).
ANNOTATED TEXTS.
6"^^
Educational
Catalogue.
IN
PRIMARY EDU-
CATION.
HOGAN
With
(E.).
Preface, Translation, and Indices ; also a Treatise on Irish Neuter
Substantives, and a Supplement to the Index Vocabulorum of
Zeuss's "Grammatica Celtica." Todd Lecture Series, Vol. IV.
8vo, sewed,
^s. 6d.
2s. 6d.
HUGO
(VICTOR).
LES MISERABLES:
Les Principaux
Episodes.
2 vols.
Todd Lecture
J. Boielle.
W.C.
40
HUGO
NOTRE DAME DE
(VICTOR).
LEABHAR BREAC.
"The
Great Book of
By
PARIS.
the
Each
laie
Adapted
Boielle.
J.
^s.
styled,
Dun Doighre":
a Collection of Pieces in
Irish and Latin, transcribed towards the close of the Fourteenth
Century.
"The oldest and best Irish MS. relating to Church
History now preserved" {G. Petrie).
Now first published, from
the original MS. in the Royal Irish Academy's Library.
In
imperial folio, on toned paper.
In one vol., half-calf, ^, 4^.
(200 copies only printed.)
LEABHAR NA H-UIDHRi. A
and Verse,
in the Irish
the
of
ancient Ireland ; now for the first time published, from the original in the Library of the Royal Irish
Academy, with account of the Manuscript, description of its
contents, index, and facsimiles in colours.
In folio on toned
paper, half-calf.
^3, 35-. (200 copies only printed.
ecclesiastical
LILJA (The
An
Lily).
Icelandic
Religious Poem.
By
Eystein
LODGE
(Sir O.).
REFORM. A
MAORI.
MAORI CONVERSATIONS.
W.
"The Book
N. Lettsom.
otherof Kriemhild."
An English Translation by
5th Edition.
8vo, cloth.
55.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
O'GRADY (STANDISH
SILVA GADELICA
(L-
with Extracts
illus-
H.).
Collection of Tales in
XXXI.).
and Places.
trating Persons
41
Irish,
Edited from
MSS. and
translated.
OORDT
CAPE DUTCH.
PHILLIPPS
(V.,
B.A.).
by
short
Phrases and
Grammatical
A SHORT SKETCH OF
GERMAN LITERATURE,
for
Schools.
ROGET
Irish
By
Vivian
Edinburgh.
AN INTRODUCTION TO OLD
(F.
F.).
History, Grammar,
Crown Svo, cloth.
FRENCH.
2nd Edition.
FIRST STEPS IN FRENCH HISTORY, LITERATURE, AND PHILOLOGY. For Candidates for the Scotch
Leaving Certificate Examinations, the various Universities Local
Crown
Examinations, and the Army Examinations.
4th Edition.
Svo, cloth,
^s.
ROSING
(S.).
Edition.
SCHILLER (F.
VON).
POEMS.
Translated
Fcap. Svo, cloth,
s^-
into
ANNOTATED TEXTS.
SULLIVAN
(W.
K.).
GERMAN OF
lis. 6d.
EBEL.
(Royal Irish
Mesca Ulad
Academy)
The
Intoxications of the
Ultonians. Irish Text, with Translation and Notes, by W. M.
Hennesy. Svo, sewed, is. 6d.
Vol.
Vol.
I,
Part
II.
I.
or.
Text,
14 Henrietta Street,
42
TODD LECTURE
SERIES-Continued.
for Boinn.
With Preface, Transa Treatise on Irish Neuter Substantives, and a
Supplement to the Index Vocabulorum of Zeuss's "Grammatica
Svo, sewed.
Celtica." By E. Hogan.
3^. 6d.
Vol. IV.
lation,
Indices,
Languages.
2s. 6d.
LARGER SPANISH
VELASQUEZ.
DICTIONARY.
Composed from
5J-.
ELEMENTS OF GERMAN.
WEISSE
With a
(T. H.).
Crown
Course of Exercises instructing in Simpler Composition.
Svo, cloth.
3^.
Grammar.
3^.
Crown
Edition.
Svo, cloth.
(Key,
^s.
net.)
6d.
3rd Edition.
most
Cloth.
in use.
being a
With Examination
2s.
We
i6mo,
cloth,
is.
6d.
WILLIAMS (The Right Rev. W. L., D.C.L.). A DICTIONARY OF THE NEW ZEALAND LANGUAGE. 4th
Edited by the Right Rev. Bishop W. L. Williams, with
Edition.
numerous additions and corrections. Demy Svo, cloth. 125-. (>d.
14 Henrietta Street,
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
WILLIAMS
IN MAORI.
3rd Edition.
W.
L., D.C.L.).
43
LESSONS
3^.
and Verse)
ZOEGA
in the Irish
(G. T.)
8vo, cloth.
Language,
in part
ENGLISH-ICELANDIC DICTIONARY.
6s. net.
ZOMPOLIDES (Dr.
GREEK or, The
D.).
A COURSE OF MODERN
I.
W.C.
V. Science.
MEDICINE CHEMISTRY BOTANYZOOLOGYMATHEMATICS.
BENEDICT
F.R.S.).
cloth.
315-.
Illustra-
6d.
ELEMENTARY ORGANIC
Ph.D.).
Small Svo.
(F. E.,
ANALYSIS.
M.D.,
With 825
Pages vi + 82.
15
Illustrations.
(D. G.).
HANDBOOK OF PRACTICAL HY6^^. net.
GIENE. Small 8vo. Pages v+ 164.
BILTZ (HENRY). THE PRACTICAL METHODS OF
BERGEY
6j-.
lated
Pages
Small 8vo.
viii
+ 245.
44
Trans-
Illustrations.
BOLTON.
i2mo.
96 pages.
6 Illustrations,
Memoir XII.)
Price
is.
1905.
IN
NEW
OR-
Memoir
Ss. net.
FREETOWN
(1905).
Memoir XIV.)
A
BRUCE
TOPOGRAPHICAL ATLAS OF THE SPINAL CORD.
Fcap.
folio, half-leather.
CREIGHTON
2,
2s. net.
(CHAS., M.D.).
138
1
figures
Researches showing
and cause. With 24 Lithographic Plates containing
Royal 8vo, cloth.
from the Author's drawings.
2 J. 6d. net.
14 Henrietta Street,
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
45
By Charles Creighton, M.D., sometime DemonAnatomy, Cambridge Medical School, author of " Bovine
12s. 6d. net.
Royal 8vo, cloth.
Tuberculosis in Man," etc.
strator of
CUNNINGHAM MEMOIRS
Cubic Transformations.
1.
sewed.
On
2.
D.
J.
3.
etc.
the
the
Lumbar Curve
in
Man
Casey,
LL.D.
4to,
By
sewed,
4.
By John
2s. 6d.
is.
6d.
A New
sewed.
Ball,
Chapter in
LL.D.
4to,
2s.
New
Observations and Catalogue.
Stars.
Edited by Rev. T. Espin, M.A. 4to, sewed,
y. 6d.
6. On the Morphology of the Duck Tribe and the Auk
Tribe. By W. K. Parker, F.R.S. 9 Plates. 4to, sewed. 3^. 6d.
7. Contribution to the Surface Anatomy of the Cerebral
Hemispheres. By D. J. Cunningham, M.D. With a Chapter
upon Cranio-Cerebral Topography by Victor Horsley, M.B.,
F.R.S. 4to, sewed. 8^. 6d.
Part I.
Out of Print.
8. On the Flinders Petrie Papyri.
Part II. With 18 Auto9. On the Flinders Petrie Papyri.
Appendix to 8 and 9. ^s. net.
4to, sewed.
^2s. net.
types.
A Study
ID. The Decorative Art of British New Guinea.
Alfred
Ethnography.
By
C. Haddon, M.A.
With
Papuan
in
12 Plates, and numerous other Illustrations. 4to, sewed. 14J. net.
With Transcriptions,
II. On the Flinders Petrie Papyri.
Commentaries, and Index. By John P. Mahaffy, D.D., and Prof.
With 7 Autotypes. 4to, sewed. 42J-. net.
J. Gilbert Smyly.
5.
The Red
Edition.
School
of
Tropical Medicine,
Memoir VII.)
4to,
Ts. 6d.
REPORT OF THE
E., M.B., Ch.B.).
(J.
MALARIA EXPEDITION TO THE GAMBIA. (Liver-
DUTTON
Memoir X.)
4to.
Tropical Medicine,
Memoir XI. )
4to.
igj-.
6d. net.
Price
5i^.
W.C.
46
DUTTON
L.
TODD,
B.A.,
M'Gill.
TICK-FEVER IN
ENGELHARDT
WATER.
JOHN
E.,
(J.
CM.,
M.D.,
THE ELECTROLYSIS
(V.).
Pages
8vo.
4to.
x+ 140.
90
OF
5j.net.
Illustrations.
(Lieut-Col.).
GENERAL SANITATION AND
ANTI-MALARIAL MEASURES IN SEKONDI, THE
GOLDFELDS, AND KUMASSI, AND A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONDITIONS OF
EUROPEAN RESIDENCE IN INDIA. (Liverpool School
GILES
Memoir XV. )
of Tropical Medicine,
HANTZSCH
ISTRY.
Figures.
Price
4to.
']s.
6d. net.
ELEMENTS OF STEREOCHEM-
(A.).
Translated by Wolf.
i2mo.
Pages
viii
+ 206.
26
8vo,
iv
+ 365.
163 Figures.
8j-.
6^. net.
22 pp.
is, net.
From
the
German.
HART (EDWARD,
Royal 8vo,
cloth,
10s. 6d.
CHEMISTRY FOR
Ph.D.).
BEGINNERS. Small i2mo.
Vol. I. Inorganic.
Pages viii+188.
55 Illustrations and 2
Plates.
Fourth Edition, ^s. 6d. net.
Vol. II. Org-anic.
Pages iv + 98,
11 Illustrations.
2s. net.
Vol. III. Experiments.
Separately.
60 pages.
net.
i.s-.
HOFF
(J.
5.?.
165 pages.
net.
VAN'T).
H.
Small i2mo.
DYNAMICS.
STUDIES IN CHEMICAL
HOWE
(J.
L.).
CHEMISTRY
INORGANIC
Howe.
FOR
Lewis Howe,
Being a Second Edition of
Chemistry according to
F. P. Venable and J. L.
By
Jas.
By
the Periodic Law."
8vo, cloth.
I2s. 6d. net.
Demy
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
JOHNSTONE
BRITISH FISHERIES:
(J.).
47
Their Ad-
lations,
JONES
SURGICAL ANATOMY OF
SHARE-).
T.
(J.
THE HORSE.
To
LIFE-SIZE MODELS,
Anatomy
each;
THE FREEZING
models,
p^2i
or
Aspects, 6,
Aspects, 6,
JONES.
of the
i6s.
6s.
Fore
separately
6d.
each.
+ 64.
y.
14 Illustrations,
i2mo.
At
Botany.
various prices.
various prices.
THE
OF
JOURNAL
Pages
net.
ROYAL
20i-.
MICROSCOPICAL
SOCIETY,
32,
Nos. 1-26,
IS.
half-yearly,
t,s.
2s.
6d.
net.
1893,
6d. net.
LANDOLT
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS.
Illustrations.
3IJ-.
Pp. xxi-F75i-
Svo.
83
6d. net.
LANGENBECK.
LEAVENWORTH
Illustrated.
Out
of Print.
8j-. 6a'.
net.
INORGANIC
QUALITATIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS FOR ADVANCED SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES. 8vo. Pages
vi H-
54.
(Prof.
W.
S.,
M.Sc).
THE PRODUCTION OF
(Dr.
MAX).
CHROMIUM AND ITS COMPOUNDS BY THE AID
OFTHE ELECTRIC CURRENT. 8vo. 122 pages. net.
LEBLANC
5^.
COMMITTEE.
MARINE BIOLOGY
MEMOIRS ON TYPICAL BRITISH MARINE
PLANTS AND ANIMALS. Edited by W. A. Herdman,
LIVERPOOL
D. Sc.
I.
F. R. S.
Ascidia.
14 Henrietta Street,
5 Plates.
Price2j.net.
48
By
Cardium.
2.
J.
With
College, Liverpool.
Price
7 Plates.
Price
3 Plates.
\s.
6d. net.
By Sydney
Alcyonium.
3 Plates.
Price
is,
6d. net.
6.
By Herbert
Antedon.
Clifton
Chadwick.
With
7 Plates.
By Joseph
Cancer.
LONG
(J.
H.).
Small 8vo.
MASON
(W.
P., Prof, of
TIVE ANALYSIS.
31 Illustrations.
Chem.). NOTES
Sm. i2mo. 56 pp.
MEADE (RICHARD
MANUAL.
Out
of Print.
ON QUALITA-
8j-.
y. 6d
net.
CHEMIST'S POCKET
K., B.Sc.)
i6mo. Leather. Pocket Edition.
Pages
vii
+ 204.
6d. net.
ANALYSIS.
Second Edition.
With 100
Illustrations.
14J. 6d.
net.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
49
I. Ross (R.)
Malarial Fever
Its Cause, Prevention,
and Treatment. 8vo. 2s. 6d.
II. Ross (R.), H. E. Annett, and E. E. Austen.
Report
of the Malaria Expedition to Sierra Leone (1899). 4to. 21s.
III.
Annett (H. E.), J. E. Dutton, and J. H. Elliott.
Report of the Malaria Expedition to Nigeria (1900). I.
:
Malarial Fever.
los. 6d.
4to.
Ross
(R.)
arrived at to date.
8vo.
is.
Part II.
1902.
8vo.
is.
Suez.
8vo.
X. Dutton
the Gambia.
IS.
(J. E.).
4to.
Boyce
XII.
8vo.
(R.).
at Ismailia.
IJ-.
8 Plates.
Price
5.r.
XV. Giles (Lieut. -Colonel). General Sanitation and AntiMalarial Measures in Sekondi, the Goldfields, and Kumassi,
and a Comparison between the Conditions of European
Residence in India.
4to.
Price
W.C.
50
Breinl,
Trypanosomes, Trypano-
M.U.Dr., Prag.
Yellow Fever
M.B., F.R.S.).
Orleans in 1905. Imp. 8vo. Maps and
Boyce (Rubert,
XIX.
Prophylaxis in
6 Plates.
XX.
Price
I.
New
^s. net.
Dutton
(J.
Everett,
MOISSON
Pages x
articles.
4to.
Svo.
5^. net.
IN
By
W.C
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
51
STANCES.
OTTO
See
81 pp.
8vo.
2s. net.
(RUDOLF).
Crown Theological
Library, p. 11.
y.
6d, net.
Anatomy
Hunterian
Crown
PFANHAUSER
4to.
los. net.
(Dr. W.).
PRODUCTION OF METAL-
5^. net.
PHILLIPS(FRANCIS C). METHODS FORTHE ANALYSIS OF ORES, PIG IRON AND STEEL. Second
Edition.
8vo.
Pages
viii
+ 1 70.
3 Illustrations.
4J-.
6^. net.
PRAY
ASTIGMATIC LETTERS.
(Dr.).
board, size 22 by 14 inches,
Printed on Mill-
is.
I,
1905.
Crown
4to, cloth,
8vo, cloth.
los. net.
F.R.C.P.).
THE INGENERAL PATHOLOGY.
F.R.S.,
IN
7^. 6d.
W.C.
).
ment.
cloth.
Memoir
I.)
8vo,
2s. 6d.
H. E.
ANNETT,
AUSTEN.
4to,
21s.
(Liverpool
School
of
Tropical Medicine,
Memoir IX.)
IS.
SANG'S LOGARITHMS.
SCHREBER
(D. G. M.).
TICS,
3J. net.
" The exercises described, when efficiently used, will undoubtedly be of value
The descriptions of the
in strengthening and developing the muscular system.
exercises and the figures in the text are excellent." Physician and Surgeon.
" Well worthy of the attention of those who go in for regular physical training as a means for the preservation of health." Scotsman.
Glasgow Herald.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
53
Schroen,
gs.
SEGER.
Large 8vo.
2 vols.
^^3,
3^-.
per volume,
6d.
315-.
net.
Best Types
14th Edition,
Determination of the Acuteness of Vision.
considerably augmented and improved,
8vo, sewed.
4s.
Single
Sheets: E T B,
B D E, LU liJ U, and Large Clock Sheet.
Sd. each.
Small Clock Sheet and R T V Z. 4^. each.
for the
MOV,
SNYDER (HARRY,
Second Edition,
B.Sc).
8vo.
Pages x + 294.
Plate.
40
Illustrations,
SONNTAG (C. O.). A POCKET FLORA OF EDINBURGH AND THE SURROUNDING DISTRICT.
A
6d. net.
STILLMAN (THOS.
CHEMISTRY.
Illustrations.
ENGINEERING
Pages x
+ 597.
139
19^, net.
TAYLOR
Memoir VIII.)
8vo.
is.
W.C.
54
TOWER
6 Plates
(5 coloured)
THE CONDUCTIVITY OF
P., Ph.D.).
8vo.
Pages iv+190.
(O.
LIQUIDS.
20
Illustrations.
6s.
6d.
net.
Vol. XXXIX.
Part i, 30J.
Part 4, 7^. 6a'.
Part
Part 3, 43 J. Part 4, gs. Vol. XL. Part i, 25^-. Complete
parts only
we do not supply separate papers. General Index to
First Thirty-four Volumes (1783-1888), with History of the
Part3,
30J.
'
2, igs.
Institution.
4to, cloth.
21s.
I.-XX.
Vols.
410.
;^22,
5^.
6d.
XXI.-
Vols.
Various prices.
VEGA.
the 40th, or Dr. Bremiker's Edition, thoroughly revised and enlarged, by W. L. F. Fischer, M.A., F.R.S., Fellow of Clare
College, Cambridge
Professor of Natural Philosophy in the
University of St. Andrews.
75th Stereotyped Edition. Royal 8vo,
;
cloth.
Ts.
VENABLE
C,
(T.
Ph.D.).
los.
(>d.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF
Small
i2mo.
Pages viii-f32i.
net.
i2mo.
Pages vi-|-29o.
and
ING TO
ujidei-
Howe,
p. 46.
Ready.
3 vols. 8vo.
18^. net.
WYSOR
Vol.1.
METALLURGY.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
55
VI. Miscellaneous.
ANTHROPOLOGY SOCIOLOGYMYTHOLOGYBIBLIOGRAPHY BIOGRAPHY, ETC.
AVEBURY
PREHISTORIC TIMES,
gilt tops.
"
iSs.
To anyone who
" The fact that this well-known standard work has reached a sixth edition is
its value to ethnologists and archieologists.
The many and beautiful
illustrations are most helpful in better understanding the plain but accurate
letterpress.
Lord Avebury is to be congratulated on the new edition, which
is sure to further popularise a fascinating subject for investigation by cultured
evidence of
people. "
"It
Science Gossip.
BLACKBURN
(HELEN).
WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE. A
6s.
BROWN
ENCE
Women under
the Factory
(ROBERT,
IN
Prof
Max
7 J. 6d.
MR. GLADSTONE AS
Essays.
Demy
8vo, cloth,
"js.
at Phoenicia
loj-,
KNEW
1200 B.C.,
6d, each.
HIM, and
6d.
W.C.
other
56
Square.
5 J. net.
St James's
xiv+1626
etc.
pp.
4to, cloth.
196 pp.
C. T.
net.
42i-.
5i-.net.
level of
DIETRICHSON
(L.).
MONUMENTA
ORCADICA.
The
Norsemen
in the
ENGELHARDT
DENMARK
(C).
IRON AGE.
Illustrated
Mosses of Slesvig.
THE EARLY
IN
by recent Discoveries
the
in
Peat-
wood.
1866.
4to, cloth.
GOLDAMMER
315-.
dd.
THE KINDERGARTEN. A
(H.).
to Frobel's Method of Education,
trations.
8vo, cloth.
10^. 6^.
HARRISON
(A.,
D.Sc).
2 vols, in
i.
120 pp. of
Guide
Illus-
WOMEN'S INDUSTRIES
IN
HENRY
Labour of Women.
.^sthetical
of
all
and
35.
all
Vol.
2^
8vo.
2s. net.
HERBERT (Hon. A.). THE SACRIFICE OF EDUCATION TO EXAMINATION. Letters from "All Sorts and
Conditions of
boards.
2s.
and
Men."
WAGER
HEALTH.
(HAROLD).
Half-cloth
Reprinted
sewed, is.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS.
JOHNSON
With a
57
(E.).
brief account of the Author's Life
8vo, cloth.
KIEPERT'S
Demy
and Writings.
15J. net,
NEW ATLAS
ANTIQUUS.
Twelve Maps of
of Ancient Italy.
Italia antiqua.
Scale
Wall-map
of Ancient Greece.
For
24s.
1,000,000.
Caesar,
Mounted on
Wall-Map
Tabula.
nished.
20s.
14 Henrietta Street,
58
MARCKS
Demy
1500-1900.
MUIR
(Prof.
8vo,
stiff
wrapper,
is.
With Maps,
Illustrations.
Crown
6s. net.
the Earliest
4to, cloth.
Times
to the
2is. net.
OTIA MERSEIANA.
6d.
Svo, cloth.
7s. 6d.
Popular Edition,
3^. 6d.
Science Quarterly.
SPENCER (HERBERT).
AN AUTOBIOGRAPHY.
See
p. 30.
PRINCIPLES OF SOCIOLOGY.
STUDY OF SOCIOLOGY.
Seey^. 30.
See p. 31.
DESCRIPTIVE SOCIOLOGY.
See p. 31.
STEPHENS
(GEORGE).
PROFESSOR BUGGE'S
STUDIES ON NORTHERN MYTHOLOGY EXAMINED. Illustrations. 8vo, cloth. %s.
4to, sewed.
6j.
20J-.
Vol. IV.
net.
W.C.
CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS
VEILED FIGURE
buckram,
gilt,
cover
by
designed
Mr.
T.
59
2s. 6d.
Part
2.
Position of the
WELD (A.
G.).
Crown
Employed.
8vo, cloth,
net.
i^-,
SOME OF
HIS FRIENDS.
art linen.
6d. net.
4^-.
a delightful little book, written by one who has all the qualifications
for the task
the opportunities of observation, the interest of relationship, and the
sympathetic and appreciative temper.
We do not attempt to criticise,
but only to give such a description as will send our readers to it," Spectator.
" Everyone who reads the book will understand Tennyson a little better,
and many will view him in a new aspect for the first time." Daily Chronicle.
is
" It
Herald.
is
14 Henrietta Street,
'
Life.' "
Glasgotv
6o
AND
PROCEEDINGS
AND
TRANSACTIONS
OF LEARNED SOCIETIES
Subscription,
lOi-.
per
Quarterly Review of
Single numbers, 2s. 6d.
annum, post
free.
Subscription,
5^.
per annum.
Price
3^-.
6<af.
7^. 6d.
Issued
Transactions.
MARINE
LIVERPOOL
Memoirs.
I.
COMMITTEE.
BIOLOGY
at various prices.
Fauna of
irregularly
prices vary.
Transactions
and
Proceedings
Cunningham Memoirs.
Vols.
W.C.
Avesti, Pahlavi.
Ball, Sir
Robert
S.
Cunningham Memoir,
45.
Universal Christ, 15
Beard, Rev. Dr. C.
Reformation of the Sixteenth Century, 13.
Rev.
and Principles, 15.
E.
Doctrine
Beeby,
C.
Mitchell, 21,
Biblical Hebrew, Introduction to.
Rev. Jas.
Kennedy, 20, 34.
Henry. Methods of Determining Mole-
Biltz,
Brewster,
H.
B.
Nature
Mystery of Newman,
Bremond, Henri.
The
The
Prison, 28;
ette
15.
Statu-
Anarchy and
Johnstone, 47.
Broadbent, Rev. T. B. Sermons, 15.
Brown, Robert. Semitic Influence, Origin of
the iPrimitive Constellations, 55 Gladstone
British Fisheries.
J.
as
Knew Him,
55.
Bruce, Alex.
Topographical Atlas of the
Spinal Cord, 44.
Buddha. Prof. H. Oldenberg, 35.
Burkitt, Prof. F. C. Anglican Liberalism, 12.
Calculus, Differential and Integral.
Harnack,
46.
Caldecott, Dr. A.
Anglican Liberalism,
12.
12.
39.
Celtic Studies.
Place Society.
Centenary
Moncure D. Conway, 16.
Chadwick, Antedon, 48 Echinus, 48.
Chaldee Language, Manual of. "Turpie, 37.
;
INDEX Continued.
62
Crompton Jones,
Canticles.
Rev. John
in.
H. Van't
J.
Hebrew Language,
Hoff, 46.
Dob-
Frank
Collins, F,
sophy,
in the
J.
H.
48.
Pleuronectes, 48.
Epitome of Synthetic Philo-
28.
25.
C. Engel-
hardt, 56.
De
Dillmann, A.
33.
Dogma, History
Drey, S.
of.
Harnack,
A Theory of Life,
Driver, S. R.
18.
32.
Durham, H. E.
16.
Cole,
Denmark
Drummond, Dr.
urst, 44.
Closet Prayers.
33.
Harnack,
schiitz, 3.
Christian
Codium.
Dawning
20.
Para, 49.
Durham,
J. E.,
Psalms.
Ewald,
Protestant,
8,^
24.
Common
ment,
Electrolytic
2.
Laboratories.
Nissenson,
Daniel and
Daudet, A.
Contes Militaires,
38.
50.
33.
Herrmann,
11.
INDEX-Continued.
Essays. Herbert Spencer, 31.
Prof. Simon Laurie, 28.
Ethica.
Ethical Import of Darwinism. Schurman, 29.
Ethics, Data of. Herbert Spencer, 31.
Ethics, Early Christian. Prof. ScuUard, 24.
Ethics, Principles of. Herbert Spencer, 30.
Ethiopic Grammar. A. Dillmann, 33.
Eucken, Prof. Life of the Spirit, 12.
Eugene's Grammar of French Language, 39.
Evans, A. Anti-Malaria Measures at Bathurst, etc., 44.
63
Haddon, A. C.
Decorative Art of British
Guinea, Cunningham Memoir, 45.
Hagmann, J. G., Ph.D. Reform in Primary
Education, 39.
Handley, Rev. H. Anglican Liberalism, 12.
Hantzsch, A. Elements of Stereochemistry, 46.
Hardy. Elements of Analytical Geometry', 46
Infinitesimals and Limits, 46.
Harnack, Adolf.
Acts of the Apostles, 12
History of Dogma, 4 Letter to the " Preus-
54
Canon
New
New
Test. Times, 7.
translated by.
Viga
History of the
Sir Edmund,
Glums Saga, 42.
Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon. Dr. Fuerst, 34.
Hebrew Language, The. F. Delitzsch, 33.
Head,
Hebrew
Hebrew
Hebrew
Gammarus.
Evolution of Chris-
tianity, 17.
55.
Child and
Religion, 10.
Herbert, Hon. A. Sacrifice of Education, 56.
Bad Air
Herbert, Hon. A., and Wager, H.
and Bad Health, 56.
Herdman, Prof. W. A. Ascidia, 47. _
Christianity in
Herford, R. Travers, B.A.
Talmud and Midrash, 19.
Herrmann, W. Communion, 5, 11 Faith and
Morals, 10.
',
Gospel, II.
Heterogenesis, Studies in. H. Bastian, 44.
Hewitt, C. Gordon. Ligia, 48.
Hibbert Journal, The, 19.
Hibbert, Lectures, The, 13, 14.
INDEX Continued.
Hirsch, Dr. S. A., and W. Aldis Wright,
edited by. Commentary on Job, 27.
History of the Church. Hans von Schubert, 3.
History of Dogma. Adolf Harnack, 4.
History of Jesus of Nazara. Keim, 7.
History of the Hebrews. R. Kittel, 5.
Historyofthe Literature of theO.T. Kautzsch,
20.
Hodgson,
28
Hoff, J. H. Van't.
Hogan, E.
Anatomy
of, 47.
How
Human
Human
Hymns
of
Duty and
Faith.
Jones, 20.
47-
47, 60.
Herbert Spencer,
Justice.
31.
Kantian Ethics.
J. G. Schurman, 29.
Karaite MSS. Dr. R. Hoerning, 19.
Kautzsch, E. History of the Literature of the
Old Testament, 20.
Keim. History of Jesus of Nazara, 7.
Kennedy, Rev. Jas. Introduction to Biblical
Hebrew, 34
New
Kiepert's
Kiepert's
Hebrew Synonyms,
34.
57.
Laboratory Experiments.
ken, 51.
and Limits.
Hardj', 46.
Memoirs,
Letter
Jesus of Nazara.
Keim,
Chemical Analysis,
to
48.
the
Adolf Harnack,
7.
47.
Dr. Max.
The Production of
Chromium, 47.
Le Coup de Pistolet. Merimde, 38.
Lepeophtheirus and Lernea. Vide L.M.B.C.
Leblanc,
Lettsom,
W.
"Preussische
Jahrbucher."
18.
Nibelungenlied,
40.
48.
Lineus.
INDEX Continued.
Municipal Government
Liverpool,
and
in.
Muir
Piatt, 58.
School
Liverpool
Memoirs,
Medicine
Tropical
of
Henry
48.
Montefiore,
C.
Hebrews,
13.
Monumenta
The
Resurrection of Jesus
Christ, 21.
Mackenzie, Malcolm.
Dynamics, 28.
and
Social
Political
Williams, 43.
Maori, New and Complete Manual of, 40.
Marcbant, James. Theories of the Resurrection, 21.
Sir Clements,
Rev.
IZ>r.
Materialism, 21
and Religion, 21.
Modern
James.
Prof. W. P.
Notes on Qualitative
Analysis, 48.
Massoretic Text. Rev. Dr. J. Taylor, 25.
Masterman, C. F. G. Child and Religion, 10.
Meade, R. K., Portland Cement, 48.
Mason,
Mediaeval
Thought, History
FaizuUah-Bhai,
Present.
of.
R. Lane
Poole, 22.
Memoirs of the Liverpool School of Tropical
Shaikh,
34-
Henri Bremond,
of
15.
R^ville, 14.
22.
Newstead, R.
Martineau,
L. Dietrichson, 56.
Vide Mercer's Soul of
Stephen, Democracy and
Mystery of Newman.
Lilja, 40.
Marcks, Erich.
Orcadica.
Progress,
21 ;
Character, 25.
B.D.,
Macan, R. W.
Moorhouse Lectures.
Moslem
34-
Markham,
Biltz, 44.
Monasticism.
49.
Lobstein, Paul.
Long, J. H.
65
Another
New
Dermanyssid
of.
Rt.
Rev. W. L. Williams, 42.
Nibelungenlied. Trans. W. L. Lettsom, 40.
Nissenson.
Arrangements of Electrolytic
Laboratories, 50.
Noldeke, Theodor.
Delectus Veterum, 35
Syriac Grammar, 35.
Norris, E. Assyrian Dictionary, 35.
Norseman in the Orkneys. Dietrichson, 56.
of Progress, 21.
Merim^e, Prosper.
Le Coup de
Pistolet, 38.
Panho,
Edited
by V.
The.
Trenckner. 35.
Mission and Expansion of Christianity. Adolf
Milanda
Harnack, 3.
Rev. A.
F.
How
Materialism.
Martineau, 21.
Rev.
Mitchell,
to
Teach the
Bible, 21.
Modern
Dr.
James
INDEX Continued.
66
Handbook
of.
Patella.
48.
Platts, 36.
Pfanhauser, Dr.
Christianity, 2.
Phillips, F. C.
Analysis of Ores, 51.
Phillipps, v., B.A.
Short Sketch of
Literature, 41.
German
Platts,
Language,
Persian
36.
Brown,
55.
R. A. Peddie,
H. B. Brewster,
58.
28.
Psychology, Principles
lines of,
Anglican Liberalism,
12.
Renan, E,
Renouf, P. L.
^4-
Rome
on Christianity,
R^ville, Jean.
Rhys, Prof. J.
Heathendom,
Mackay,
14.
R.
W.
21.
Printing at Brescia.
Prison, The.
Wundt,
Punnett, R. C.
of,
32,
Lineus, 48.
Transactions
and
Transactions
and
Proceedings, 60.
Qualitative Analysis, Notes on.
Mason,
Prof.
W.
P.
48.
Royal
Irish
Academy.
Proceedings, 60.
Transactions
of, 60.
50.
Parasite of
INDEX Continued.
Runes, The.
67
Snellen's
Spirit, 3.
tivism, 29.
Assyria, 14.
Adolf Harnack,
12.
Ballads, 41.
Schiller.
Industrial Re-
muneration, 58.
School Teaching and School Reform.
Lodge,
Books of the
New
burgh, 53.
Sorensen, S. Index to the Mahabharata, 36.
Soul of Progress. Bishop Mercer, 21.
Spanish Dictionary, Larger. Velasquez, 42.
Spencer, Herbert. Drey on Herbert Spencer's
Theory of Religion and Morality, 32.
Spencer, Herbert. An Autobiography, 30
A System of Synthetic Philosophy, 30; Descriptive Sociology, Nos. 1-8, 31
Works by,
30-32 Theory of Religion and Morality, 32.
Spinal Cord, Topographical Atlas of. Alex.
Bruce, M.A., etc., 44.
Spinoza. Edited by Prof. Knight, 32.
Spiritual Teaching of Christ's Life, Henslow, 18.
;
Statuette, The,
Methods of
D. F.
Schloss,
D D.
Soden, H. von,
Testament, 11.
Soils
Sir O.
H. B.
G. Horner,
25, 36.
40.
Brewster, 28.
Statutes, The, of the Apostles.
8.
Gym-
Mythology Examined, 58
Old Northern
Runic Monuments, 58 The Runes, 58.
nastics, 52.
Darwinism, 29
Kantian Ethics,
New
49.
Smith, Martin R.
Children, 25.
10.
Anatomy of the
Proboscis of Biting Flies, 50.
Stereochemistry, Elements of. Hantzsch, 46.
Stewart, Rev. C. R. S. Anglican Liberalism, 12.
Stillman, T. B. Engineering Chemistry, 53.
Storms. Piddington, 51.
Strong, S. Arthur, ed. by. Shihab Al Din, 36.
Study of the Saviour. Alex. Robinson, 23.
Studies
on Northern Mythology.
Geo.
Stephens, 58.
Studies from the Yale Psj'chological Laboratory.
Edward W.
Sullivan,
W. K.
Syriac Chrestomathy.
16.
and Religion,
29.
Weir,
What
Have Taught
My
Character of the
Tayler, Rev. John James.
Fourth Gospel, 25.
Taylor, Rev. C. Dirge of Coheleth, The, 25.
Taylor, Rev. Dr. J. Massoretic Text, 25.
INDEX Continued.
68
Taylor.
Town, 49.
Ten Services and Psalms and Canticles,
Ten Services of Public Prayer, 25-26.
25.
Tischendorf, 26,
27.
Wallis,
the
37,
27.
Sleeping Sickness,
Thornton, Rev.
50.
J. J.
10.
Tischendorf, C. The
Todd Lectures Series, 41, 42.
Tower, O. F. Conductivity of Liquids, 54.
Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society, 54.
Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, 54.
Transactions of the Royal Societyof Edinburgh,
54-
42.
Beginnings of Christianity, 4.
Children. Martin
Wernle, Paul.
What
Have Taught my
R. Smith,
What
is
25.
Christianity
Adolf Harnack,
5, 10.
Analysis, 54.
Wilkinson, Rev. J. R.
Anglican Liberalism,
Williams, Right. Rev. W. L., D.C.L. Dictionary of the New Zealand Language, 42.
Williams, Right Rev. W. L., D.C.L. Lessons
in Maori, 42.
Struggle for Light, 9. J
Wimmer, R.
Women under the Factory Acts. Vynne and
Blackburn, 59.
Women's Industries. A. Harrison, 56.
Women's Suffrage. Helen Blackburn, 5s.
Woods, Dr. H. G. Anglican Liberalism, 12.
Wright, Rev. C. H. H. Book of Genesis, in
Hebrew Text, 27 Book of Ruth in Hebrew
Text, 27 Daniel and its Critics, 27 Daniel
and his Prophecies, 27 Light from Egyptian
Papyri, 27.
Book of Job, 27;
Wright, G. H. Bateson.
Was Israel ever in Egypt? 27.
Wright, W., and Dr. Hirsch, edited by. Commentary on the Book of Job, 27.
Wundt, Wilhelm. Outlines of Psychology, 32.
Wysor. Metallurgy, 54.
My
Urine Analysis,
A Text-Book of
Long,
48.
Law,
54
Study of Atom,
54.
Mystery,
32-
26.
Vaillante, 38.
CO..
LTD..
EDINBURGH.
DATE DUE
DEMCO
38-297
.^^
'
iTTTTyW li^iffiM
BS2625 4.H28
The Acts of the Apostles
Pr nceton Theological Seminary-Speer Library
/f.
I, -'^j
JI'^^-'^^^'-^-
fe;*^-*::
^l-K