Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

9/23/2016 JUDGMENT/ORDERINAPPLICATIONU/s482No.6361of2012atAllahabadDated15.3.2012CASETITLESatishChaudharyVs.StateOfU.P.

An

eLegalixAllahabadHighCourtJudgmentInformationSystem(Judgment/OrderinText
Format)

ThisisanUNCERTIFIEDcopyforinformation/reference.Forauthenticcopypleaserefertocertifiedcopyonly.In
caseofanymistake,pleasebringittothenoticeofDeputyRegistrar(Copying).
HIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATALLAHABAD
?CourtNo.54
Case:APPLICATIONU/S482No.6361of2012
Petitioner:SatishChaudhary
Respondent:StateOfU.P.AndAnr.
PetitionerCounsel:DharmendraSinghal,DineshKumarYadav
RespondentCounsel:Govt.Advocate
Hon'bleBalaKrishnaNarayana,J.
TheapplicantthroughthisapplicationfiledunderSection482Cr.P.C.hasinvokedjurisdictionofthisCourttoquashthe
chargesheetlaidinCaseCrimeNo.404of2011StateVersusBalishterandothers,underSections147,148,149,307and
120BI.P.C.,P.S.Nakud,districtSaharanpurwhichhasbeenregisteredasCaseNo.1215of2011andispendingbefore
theA.C.J.M.II,Saharanpur.
HeardSriV.P.Srivastava,SeniorAdvocateassistedbySriDharmendraSinghal,learnedcounselfortheapplicantand
learnedA.G.A.Hepraysforandisgrantedsixweeks'timetofilecounteraffidavit.
Issuenoticetotheoppositepartyno.2indicatingthereinthatshemayalsofilecounteraffidavitwithinthesameperiod.
Rejoinderaffidavit,ifany,maybefiledwithintwoweeksthereafter.
ListthereafterbeforetheappropriateCourt.
Itiscontendedbylearnedcounselfortheapplicantthattheapplicant,whoisasocialworkerhadmovedacomplaintagainst
theoppositepartyno.2inwhichStateGovernmentappointedDeputyInspectorGeneralofPolice,Saharanpurtoenquire
intotheallegationsmadebythecomplainantandonaccountoftheaforesaidfactseriesoffirstinformationreportswere
lodgedagainsttheapplicantandhisassociates.
Hefurthersubmittedthatthefirstinformationreportgivingrisetotheimpugnedcriminalprosecutionoftheapplicantwas
lodgedbytheoppositepartyno.2atthebehestofthelocalpoliceagainstunknownpersonsallegingthereinthatherson
SagarhadgonetowatchamusicalprogrammeorganizedbytheapplicantatSohanSinghTowerRoad,Nakudandwhilethe
programmewasinprogress,therewasastampedeandfiringalsobrokeoutinwhichhersonreceivedfirearminjury.
Althoughneithertheapplicantisnamedinthefirstinformationreportnoranyovertactofanykindhasbeenattributedtohim
eitherbytheinjuredortheotherwitnessesintheirstatementsrecordedduringtheinvestigationyetchargesheethasillegally
beensubmittedagainsthimandinthecircumstancestheprosecutionoftheapplicantwhichismanifestlyattendedwith
malafides,isnothingbutabuseoftheprocessofthecourtandthesameisliabletobequashed.
Insupportofhissubmissions,learnedcounselfortheapplicanthasrelieduponthejudgementoftheHon'bleApexCourtin
AllCargoMoversPvt.Ltd.AndothersVersusDhaneshBadarmalJainandanotherreportedin2008(60)SCC375.
Submissionsmadebylearnedcounselfortheapplicantprimafacieappeartobecorrectandtheapplicanthasmadeouta
caseforgrantofinterimprotection.
Inviewoftheaboveitisdirectedthattillthenextdateoflisting,furtherproceedingsofCaseNo.1215of2011,arisingoutof
CaseCrimeNo.404of2011,underSections147,148,149,307and120BI.P.C.pendingintheCourtofA.C.J.M.,Court
No.2,Saharanpurshallremainstayedasagainsttheapplicantalone.
OrderDate:15.3.2012
HR

Visithttp://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/StartWebSearch.doformoreJudgments/Ordersdeliveredat
AllahabadHighCourtandItsBenchatLucknow.Disclaimer

http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do

1/1