Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I, you, they, we, are all Filipinos. We live in one country and we are united with one
race. To the honorable judges, co counsels, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, a
pleasant afternoon. We on the negative side firmly believes that the Philippines
should not adopt Federal form of government.
Just what I like to point out a while ago, if your house has a broken window or roof,
will you restructure the entire house than to repair the window or the roof? Of
course not. Having said the contentions of the affirmative side, there is nothing in
the federal form of government that cannot be done in our current unitary form of
government. The Philippines adapting federalism is revising the Constitution, just
like the failed attempt of the then proposed Joint Resolution No. 10 which might
have required the revision of 14 of the 18 Articles of the 1987 Constitution.
If we will take an in depth cost-benefit analysis of this, it is more of a cost than a
benefit. Contrary to the major contention of the affirmative side that the very
essence of federalism is to ensure that growth and prosperity are spread to every
part of the Philippines, not just in Manila is a fallacy. Federalism allows the benefits
and costs of government to be spread unevenly. It creates disadvantages in poorer
states and communities. Furthermore, there will be overlapping work, redundancy
and confusion.
It is a fact that the Philippines is a diverse country. Each has its own capacities to
earn, as well has its own necessities. Federalism will only benefit those prime cities
but will create disadvantages in poorer states. According to National Anti Poverty
Commission (NAPC), 2 among the 5 provinces of ARMM were included in the top 10
provinces that have the highest poverty incidence among families from 2006-2012.
Maguindanao is number 4 and Lanao Del Sur tops the list. ARMM is a classic "epic
fail" example of "Federalism", being the only region that has its own government.
In federalism there will be overlapping work, redundancy and confusion. Separating
the functions of the national government and the regional government will result to
Interpolation:
Do you have a family? - YES
Are you leaving with them? - YES
-NO : Oh I'm sorry for that, but let's take for a moment
that you are
Do you eat a lot? - YES, NO
Then, you are a good example of federalism. In a family all the resources of
each family usually contributes to the budget of the whole family, regardless of your
ability to contribute or your need to consume.
YES - In your case since you eat a lot, and you are in need than the rest of the
family members, you are given most of the share in the family budget.
NO - In your case since that you don't eat a lot, regardless of your capacity to
take and your capacity to contribute, your share to the family budget is given to the
rest of the members who are more in need.
I'm sure you love your family right? - YES, and you do not wish to see that while you
are well off in living, the others are not right? - YES
Are you a resident of Manila? - YES
Are you aware of how much it cost to live in manila? - YES
So, assuming that the glass of your window of your house is broken, all you need to
do is to fix that particular thing right? - YES
You would not obviously restructure your entire house because it's well impractical
and costly right? - YES