Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
would develop into a fascination with the objects crafted from the bark
of that tree by Native Americans. Seemingly there is no end to the size,
shape, or use of the objects formed from this bark.
Recently m y collecting activity has centered on incised birch bark
items. This material, usually in the form of bark scrolls, had its origin
in the Midewiwin, or Grand Medicine Society of the Ojibwa. Inscriptions were engraved with awls on the soft inner bark of the birch for
use as mnemonic devices in ceremonial teaching about the mysteries
of the society. While most scrolls are interpreted only by initiates or
informants, speculation about engravings is possible based on studies
from scrolls which have been interpreted.
Early descriptions of this picture writing are found in the reports of
W.J.Hoffmann (1891) and Henry R. Schoolcraft (1854). A more recent
study, The Sacred Scrolls of the Southern Ojibwa, was published in
1975 by the late Selwyn Dewdney. H e examined over 150 inscribed
scrolls and developed a typology of the mnemonic records from the
research. O f the eleven scrolls in m y collection none are included in
the D e w d n e y inventory. Other inscribed birch bark items of possible
Mide origin are in the collection, too. This paper will be a study and
description of these artifacts largely using the categories developed by
Dewdney.
Prior to a review of the engraved birch bark items in the collection
a survey of material in the literature might prove helpful.
220
Richard Nelson
Outside of the studies previously mentioned there are limited references to birch bark picture writing. Frances Densmore examines it in
her Chippewa Customs (Densmore 1979:86-92, 174-183). The cover of
Norman Feder's Art of the Eastern Plains Indian (1964) is a reproduction of a song scroll in the Brooklyn Museum's Nathan Sturgis Jarvis
collection. Additional brief references are found in Feest (1980:61,62),
Whiteford (1973:109), and others.
Pictures of birch bark scrolls and inscribed work in exhibition catalogues are few. T w o scrolls were in the Sacred Circles exhibition, one
of which is partially shown in a photograph in the catalogue (Nelson
1977:99 Item 160). In the 1977 exhibition catalogue, The Native American Heritage, of the Art Institute of Chicago two scrolls are pictured
(Mauer 1977:128-129 Items 141, 143). A n incised birch bark comb case
is illustrated in Art of the Great Lakes Indians, the catalogue of the
1973 Flint Institute of Arts exhibit (Flint 1973:102 Item 479).
Other photographs are reproduced in several additional sources. The
study of the Jarvis collection, mentioned earlier, shows a song scroll
attributed to either the Sioux or Chippewa (Feder 1964:35). Richard
Conn's book, Native American Art in the Denver Art Museum, pictures
a detail from one of the Midewiwin scrolls in that institution's collection
(Conn 1979:91). A detail of one of the other large scrolls in the Denver
collection is illustrated in Feder's American Indian Art (Feder 1965
Item 218). Dewdney describes this as a Ghost Lodge or funeral scroll
and states that it is the largest one, 71 3/4 x 15 3/4 inches, that
he found (Dewdney 1975:186). Dewdney makes no reference to the
Mide roll pictured in Carrie Lyford's Ojibwa Crafts (Lyford 1943:49).
There is no information given by her about the repository where it is
located. Another scroll from an American collection, the Field M u s e u m
of Natural History, Chicago, is partially shown in America's Fascinating
Indian Heritage (Reader's Digest 1978:343). It is pictured again along
with a sacred song record in The Archaeology of North America (Snow
1976:94-95).
A European collection scroll which is not listed in Dewdney's inventory is found in Christian F. Feest's Native Arts of North America
(Feest 1980:61-62). It appears to be a master scroll and is in the M u seum fur Volkerkunde, West Berlin.
221
222
Richard Nelson
related his dream to his colleagues, they interpreted his vision as a sign to return
to their homeland which all, except the very ancient had forgotten. T h e elders
remembered a previous land and existence only in story.
The medicine people told the leaders the meaning of the ea shell. A n d the leaders immediately c o m m a n d e d the Anishnabeg to dismantle their lodges and prepare
to go on a long journey.
While the megis shell and whirlpool dominate the centre and right
side of this scroll, the most elaboratefigureis thefinelydrawn crosshatched frog. Since the frog is traditionally an evilfigure,its prominence in this scroll is enigmatic, unless it is to be inferred that the
power of the megis is able to destroy and overcome the power inherent
in the frog. Credence is given to this theory by the six shooting points
or arrows that are drawn on or around the frog. Similar arrows are
shown on human figure placement charts which were used for megis
"shooting" of Midewiwin degree candidates (Dewdney 1975:100).
The second animal figure in the scroll is a very small bear with a
heart line. Thefigureis drawn at right angles to the frog and slightly
to the right and above it. It is a small benevolent figure viewing the
victory of the Megis over the frog.
This scroll is a single section of bark. To prevent splitting of the
bark the ends are bound with small split endsticks that are bound with
ties made from the inner bark of the basswood tree.
Master Scrolls and Ritual Charts
Master scrolls were used by the Mide priests to initiate candidates
into the various degrees of the Grand Medicine Society. There were a
total of eight degrees. However, few candidates reached that level and
it is unusual to find a scroll that was used beyond the fourth degree.
The number of degrees pictured in the scrolls are referred to as lodges.
A small, 4 x 2 3/4 inches, single lodge scroll in the collection depicts
a human profile with power lines radiating from the skull. Thefigureis
set within a double circle which has an arrow and serpentfigurescoming
out of the circle. That total scene is set within a double outlined lodge.
The inscribed work on this small amulet is meticulous in the manner
in which the scribe or awl was used on the bark. W h e n Ifirstobtained
this scroll I thought that it might have been made as a tourist item.
However, upon reflection I no longer feel that was its purpose. I believe
that the scroll was used as a personnal amulet carried as a charm in a
medicine bag or bundle. I have discovered no reference in the literature to such a small scroll. It hasfinesingle endsticks bound to the bark
223
224
Richard Nelson
levels of plant forms. They are not song references since there are
no pause marks between any of the plant forms. The two pathways
connecting the three lodges show additional plant forms. The second,
or middle, lodge contains two levels of medicinal forms. The third
lodge, containing no plant forms, encloses four cross-hatched circles
and has four serpent forms writhing out of it at the termination of
the scroll. The scroll is dominated by the circular lodge forms. There
are, in addition, three groupings of two and three h u m a n figures and
several animal forms, one of which seems to be a turtle. The sections
are stitched in a haphazard manner with sinew. The endsticks are
charred larger split sticks carved with a notch towards each end and
bound to the bark with sinew.
The one scroll in the collection which is almost identical to a scroll
found in Dewdney (Dewdney 1975:90) and Blessing (Blessing 1977:155159) is a four lodge Master scroll. Their large scroll, 50 3/4 x 13 3/4
inches, came from the Minnesota White Earth Reservation. The one
in m y collection is much smaller, 32 1/4 x 4 1/2 inches. The contents
of the scrolls are so similar that the White Earth one could have been
used as the original source of the one in m y collection. Further, I have
seen another scroll in a private collection similar in size and content to
mine. It was from the Nett Lake Reservation in northern Minnesota.
These three scrolls indicate the wide distribution of similar material in
centers of Mide influence among the Ojibwa.
John C. Ewers in his recent article, "Water Monsters in Plains Indian
Art," traces the widespread influence of water monsters among the
Great Plains tribes (Ewers 1981:38-45). However, there is a strong
tradition of these creatures reflected in the artifacts of the tribes of the
Great Lakes. One of the earliest is a ca. 1780 black buck skin bag with
a porcupine quill embroidered underwater panther in the center of the
pouch (Flint 1973:2). Other examples are seen on garters, reed mats,
nettle bags and yarn bags (Flint 1973:61,71,85,87).
Between the second and third, and third and fourth lodges of this
Master scroll are two underwater panthers. In some of the literature
this cat-like creature with the horned human-faced head is called an
underground lion, Ah nah mah cumig mish shee bee szhee (Blessing
1977:154). A m o n g the titles which Dewdney lists for this monster are
Misshipeshu, Snake Monster, Underground Panther, Huge Cat, and
Great Lion (Dewdney 1975:123). Sometimes this underwater creature
225
226
Richard Nelson
227
228
Richard Nelson
are scalloped with a slit cut in each scallop. Enscribed on each scallop
is a small square and circle. Engraved on the bark is a turtle, only a
little more than half of which can be seen. Clearly distinguishable are
the outline of the shell back, the tail, head, and two claws. If the dried
bark could be unrolled, it is assumed that the two other claws would
be revealed. In the middle of the turtle shell is inscribed a circle with
arrow heads emerging from it at the four cardinal points. In the middle
of the circle are frontal views of two heads with power lines emanating
from the skulls. A highly developed technical skill on the part of the
artist is evident in the incised work on this bark. Circles and curves are
difficult to mark on the bark since the tool used in the engraving has
a tendency to follow the natural grain of the bark. This piece with its
circular lines and shapes is a demonstration of a skill which overcomes
the limitation of the medium.
Aspects of this bundle which are different from the Hoffman example
include the smoked deer hide skin which is rollled within the bark and
the manner in which bunches of feathers are rolled in the bundle and
form the ends of the medicine object.
The bark in the bundle is so dry that no attempt has been made to
unroll it for fear of damage to the bark. Neither has it been X-rayed. So
the contents are unknown. From material found in other Mide medicine
bags one would assume that ther is a megis shell, tobacco, and cloth
wrapped packets of herbs and powder used for body painting.
A birch bark rattle used in Mide rites has been added to the collection. There are no incised markings on it. The cylindrical rattle is
formed with two curved sheets of sinew sewn bark for the sides and
round circles of bark for the ends. The handle is a stick which has
been wrapped with rawhide and sewn with sinew. Descriptions of the
use of these rattles in the Mide ceremonials are found in Densmore
(1979:166,167).
W h a t began as a love of the beauty of the birch tree continues with a
respect for the priests and doctors of the Midewiwin w h o used the bark
of that tree to fashion their ceremonial scrolls and implements. While
many of the mysteries of their mnemonic devices remain unfathomed,
the scrolls which survive exhibit tantalizing invitations to a worldview
full of myths of the people w h o inhabited the forests and lakes of the
woodland area.
229
REFERENCES
Seattle: University of
Densmore, Frances
1070 Chippewa Customs. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 86. Washing
ton. (Reprinted: Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, 1070.).
Dewdney, Selwyn
1075 The Sacred Scrolls of the Southern Ojibway. Toronto: University of Toronto
Press.
Ewers, John C.
1081 Water Monsters in Plains Indian Art.
6(4):38-45.
Feder, N o r m a n
1064 Art of the Eastern Plains Indians. Brooklyn: The Brooklyn Museum.
1065 American Indian Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
1071 Two Hundred Years of North American Indian Art. New York: Praeger.
Feest, Christian F.
1080 Native Arts of North America. London: Oxford University Press.
Flint Institute of Arts
1073 The Art of the Great Lake Indians. Flint, Michigan: The Flint Institute of
Arts.
Hoffman, W.J.
1801 Midewiwin or "Grand Medicine Society"of the Ojibwa. Pp.143-300 in The
Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1885-1886.
Washington.
Howard, James H.
1080 Birch Bark and Paper Cutouts. American Indian Arts Magamine 5(4):5461,86-87.
Johnston, Basil
1076 Ojibway Heritage. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Lyford, Carrie A.
1043 The Crafts of the Ojibwa (Chippewa). Willard W . Beatty, ed. U.S. Office
of Interior Affairs, Indian Handicrafts 5. Washington.
Maurer, Evan M .
1077 The Native American Heritage. Chicago: The Art Institute of Chicago.
230
Origin Scroll
*
231
Richard Nelson
232
~M
f 11
^K
pi
wetm-st.^'
Ir
233
** ...
4 rff*?W,"-
8rH&
Right side
Left side
Four Lodge Master Scroll
Richard Nelson
234
16 l/4"x 0 1/3"
one
4"x 1 1/4"
one
T w o Lodge
17 l/4"x l/l"
two
T w o Lodge
Jft"x 10 1/4"
two
Three Lodge
10"x 10"
three
Four Lodge
Ot l/4"x 4 1/1"
four
OJIbwa(T)
OJIbwa(T)
00" x 10 1/1"
two
235
" x 1 0 "
two
O n e large tent, t w o smaller, each enclosing a figure with power lines radiating from the head. A variety of animal forms outside of tents. Sourcei
S q u a w Point, Leech L a k e , M i n n e s o t a .
Ojibwa.
S o n g scroll
0 0/4" x 14"
1 1/1" x 1 7 "
5 1/4" x 16 1/1"
one
Tightly
one
one
rolled
with
plant
forms In-
f o r m s engraved.
Sourcei
unknown.
OJlbwa(T)
Inscribed plant, h u m a n , animal, and
bird forms, one of which appears to
be a thunderbird. Soureei u n k n o w n .
OJlbwa(T)
Other Midewiwin Birch Bark Objects
Birch bark
trapped
w o o d e n doll
0 1/1"
Medicine bundle
1 0 " long
W o o d e n doll, male, w r a p p e d In 4
1/4" x 10 1/1" birch bark scroll attached with tacks to the back of the
doll. B a r k Inscribed with u n d e r w a ter panther, sea monsters, fish, and
serpent. Soureei Lac Court Orelllee,
Wisconsin, ca. 1010. O j i b w a .
Cylindrical birch bark w r a p p e d m e dicine bundle with scalloped ends.
T h e bundle Is very dry a n d has not
been opened. B a r k Is w r a p p e d around
deer hide and feathers. E n g r a v e d on
the bark Is a turtle with a circle with
four cardinal points on the outside
a n d a frontal view of t w o heads with
p o w e r lines c o m i n g from the skulls.
Sourcei u n k n o w n . Ojlbwa(f)
A sinew s e w n birch bark rattle with
rawhide w r a p p e d stick handle. N o Ins e r l p t l o n s o n t h e b a r k . Sourcei unk n o w n , possibly from M i n n e s o t a , ca.
1000. Ojibwa(r)
236
Richard Nelson
237
LINGUISTIQUE
238