Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Management
Handbook
(ISHMH)
ISHMH
Disclaimer
This document is neither a comprehensive treatment of issues concerning incident safety and health management nor a stand-alone
resource. Scientific and practical knowledge in this area are rapidly accumulating and evolving. It is intended to complement policies
and procedures put into practice by other disciplines within an incident management environment and should be used by the
industrial hygienist in conjunction with existing information.
AIHA and the authors disclaim any liability, loss, or risk resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the practices and/or theories
discussed in this handbook. Moreover, it is the readers responsibility to stay informed of policies adopted specifically in the readers
workplace.
Specific mention of manufacturers, membership organizations, and products in this guideline does not represent an endorsement by
AIHA.
Copyright 2008 by the American Industrial Hygiene Association
All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written
permission of the publisher.
Stock Number: SEPH08-744
ISBN: 978-1-931504-93-5
Published by American Industrial Hygiene Association
2700 Prosperity Ave., Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22031
www.aiha.org
Printed in the United States of America.
ii
ISHMH
Foreword......................................................................................vii
Chapter 1 Common Responsibilities.......................................1
Chapter 2 Safety Staff Organization and
Responsibilities..........................................................................7
Chapter 3 Operations Planning Cycle...................................13
Chapter 4 Hazard Risk Analysis............................................35
Chapter 5 Site Safety and Health Plan ..................................49
Chapter 6 Air Monitoring Plan and Execution ....................65
Chapter 7 Decontamination Guidelines ...............................85
Chapter 8 Respiratory Protection ..........................................95
Chapter 9 Personal Protective Equipment..........................113
Table of Contents
ISHMH
ll assigned incident safety officers, or their support
staffs, should follow this checklist to ensure proper
items or affairs are taken care of.
Chapter 1
Common Responsibilities
Arrival at the Incident
Know where the check-in locations are. They may be located at the
Base camp where the reader will lodge;
Incident command post;
Staging area;
(Note 1: If instructed to report directly to an on-scene assignment, check in with the designated incident commander or designated incident safety officer via radio or telephone communication.)
(Note 2: Always check-in. Incident command staff and general staff need to know of arrivals.)
Receive a brief from the incident commander or deputy
incident commander. Assistant safety officers should receive the briefing from the incident safety officer. Technical specialists (THSP) should receive the briefing from
the planning section chief or the deputy;
Read and if possible, get a copy of the incident action
plan and the incident safety plan;
1
Getting Organized
Incident safety officers need sufficient workspace, depending upon the number of assistant safety officers
and technical specialists assigned. Assume that the same
workspace for the incident safety officers is co-located
with the incident command post, and will be used by
each work shift. Also, consider that some assistant
safety officers may need to be attached with division or
group supervisors in the field versus working out of the
incident command post.
Recordkeeping files should be kept in either an accordion-type folder or filing cabinet. It is recommend that
the files be indexed, as a minimum:
Incident action plans
Site safety plans (Note: approved versions with
appendices)
Unit logs (Consolidate from the staff at the end of
each operational period)
Contact lists
Air monitoring logs
Accident reports
Hazard and risk analysis worksheets; and
Other indexed files as appropriate.
Office and IT-support requirements:
American Industrial Hygiene Association
People to Meet
Very early into the arrival, incident safety officers should
begin to identify and work with key stakeholders whose jobs
will be directly impacted during this response. They can
simply walk over to introduce themselves, and their official
incident staff function.
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
Demobilization
Respond to demobilization orders and brief subordinates regarding demobilization;
3
Brief shift replacements on ongoing operations when relieved at operational periods or rotation out.
Prepare personal belongings for demobilization.
Return all issued equipment before departing the AO;
Follow the check-out procedures, which should be implemented.
Participate in after-action meetings and file the appropriate reports for lessons learned.
Upon demobilization, notify the incident safety officer,
the deputy and incident commander, the resource unit
leader (RESL) at the incident site, and the home
company/agency of a safe return.
Remember, the site safety and health plan is a key component to an incident action plan. The SCFR shouldnt
let the entire process wait for them to catch-up on their
decision making.
Also, if safety officers see a very serious hazardous event
about to happen, Stop the operation! That is the incident
safety officers job, and why the IC/UC depends on
them to do it.
5. Keep Improving the Program.
The biggest mistake is to stop with the low-hanging
fruit when it comes to advising and preventing health
and safety hazards and their risks.
Definitely address these issues and fix them early on,
but the SOFR should remember who they are.
If the SOFR is an industrial hygienist, they should
start executing a more thorough exposure assessment
strategy looking at chronic exposures both dermal
and inhalational routes.
If the SOFR is a safety engineer, they should get moving on conducting more thorough engineering and
structural analysis.
If the SOFR is an environmental health professional,
they should consider developing an on-site hazard
analysis critical control point (HACCP) program,
5
Reference
1. U.S. Coast Guard: U.S. Coast Guard Incident Management Handbook (COMDTPUB P3120.17A). Washington,
DC: U.S. Coast Guard, 2006.
ISHMH
Chapter 2
Safety Staff Organization and Responsibilities
7) Investigate accidents that have occurred within the incident areas, to include support locations such as the base
camp or staging areas;
8) Assign assistants, as needed;
9) Review and approve the medical plan by coordinating
with the medical unit leader;
10) Develop the site safety plan and publish the site safety
plan summary as required;
11) Develop a work safety analysis worksheet as required;
12) Ensure that all required agency or company forms, reports, and documents are completed prior to demobilization;
13) Brief command on safety issues and concerns; and
14) Have a briefing with the IC prior to demobilization;
authority, as required, in the execution of those responsibilities. The ASOF shall be prepared to assist the SOFR in any of
the responsibilities, as required. Specific tasks may include
the following:
1) Attend and participate in tactics and planning meetings,
or other meetings and briefings, as directed;
2) Perform the duties of a field observer (FOB) to identify
and verify health and safety compliance of incident response personnel;
3) Plan, coordinate, and conduct health and safety briefings during the operations brief or in other designated
meeting and briefing engagements;
4) Recommend to the SOFR to exercise emergency authority to stop and prevent unsafe acts; or perform such
emergency authority if the situation is imminent and the
SOFR cannot be advised in time;
5) Review the medical plan;
6) Develop the site safety plan, and submit a site safety
plan summary to the SOFR;
7) Develop the hazard and risk analysis worksheet;
8) Plan, coordinate, and conduct an air monitoring plan, as
appropriate;
9) If the SOFR is unavailable, brief the command on safety
issues and concerns;
8
Technical Specialist
Industrial Hygienists (THSP-IH)
These professionals characterize the workplace environment
by anticipating, recognizing, evaluating, and controlling hazards. There may be very hazardous conditions in an incident
that are not well characterized and may pose long-term
health effects. Hazards that are inhalable, ingestable, or absorbable through the skin require some level of quantification
in order to determine the risk and the appropriate controls.
THSP-IHs can be assigned any of the following duties:
1) Evaluate the work safety analysis worksheet to further
define specific hazards that may require further research;
2) Based on any airborne-type hazards and the types of operations involved, develop, coordinate and execute an
air monitoring plan (AMP);
3) Based on any gas, vapor, liquid or particulate matter
which can be dermally absorbed, develop, coordinate
and execute a dermal monitoring and sampling method;
4) Based on the phase of a response operation, determine
the appropriate occupational exposure limits (OELs)
that ought to be used as a reference benchmark for determining over-exposures at the incident;
9
Technical Specialist
Industrial Hygiene Technician (THSP-IH TECH)
These are professionals that assist a THSP-IH or SOFR to execute specific IH tasks, as assigned. They may be expected to
perform the following functions:
1) Calibrate and maintain air monitoring, noise survey or
other exposure monitoring equipment;
2) Perform air monitoring, noise survey or other exposure
monitoring as directed by either the SOFR or THSP-IH;
3) Write out air monitoring, noise survey, or other exposure monitoring logs or reports as directed;
10
4) Perform health and safety compliance evaluations onsite IAW the current SSHP; and
5) Perform other SOFR type duties as assigned.
Technical Specialist
Safety Engineer (THSP-SFTYENG)
Significant incidents may require complex systems design in
order to perform rescue or recovery operations. The THSPSFTYENG takes an early design of a system, analyzes it to
find what faults can occur, and then proposes safety requirements in design specifications up front and changes to existing systems to make the system safer. Specific functions vary
tremendously depending on the type of situation or system
being developed or modified. In general, if an incident calls
for elaborate equipment or systems, a safety engineer should
be brought in early and immediately brought into the design
process.
Technical Specialist
Environmental Health Specialist (THSP-EH)
These are professionals educated, trained, and experienced
in performing environmental health functions, such as food
service sanitation inspections, living quarters/shelter sanitation, hospital/institutional environmental health, waste and
wastewater disposal oversight, drinking water quality, pest
management, and injury prevention programs. Professionals
assigned as a THSP-EH should be registered environmental
11
health specialists/registered sanitarians (REHS/RS). For performing food service sanitation inspections, these individuals may also be certified food safety professionals (CFSP).
12
Reference
1. U.S. Coast Guard: U.S. Coast Guard Incident Management Handbook (COMDTPUB P3120.17A). Washington,
DC: U.S. Coast Guard, 2006.
Chapter 3
Operations Planning Cycle
This occurs in all incidents where the on-scene incident commander first reporting to the scene performs the required and
immediate response measures after a rapid assessment. Under
almost every circumstance, the initial response and assessment
has no assigned SOFR, but the responsibilities of the SOFR lie
with the IC on-scene until delegated. An incident briefing form
is used.
13
Incident Briefing
When an incident transfers command from a local on-scene
incident commander to one with higher jurisdictional authorities (e.g., incident commander (IC)/unified command
(UC)), an incident briefing is conducted. A standardized incident briefing form (e.g., an ICS-201 form) is used, which has
basic information regarding the incident situation and the resources allotted to the incident. Most importantly, the form
and briefing functions as the IAP for the initial response and
remains in force and continues to develop until the response
ends or the newly assigned Planning Section generates the
incidents first IAP. It is also suitable for briefing individuals
newly assigned to the command and general Staff, incoming
tactical resources, as well as needed assessment briefing for
the staff.
14
15
16
17
18
Meeting Agenda:
1) PSC brings meeting to order, conducts roll call, covers
ground rules, and reviews agenda
2) Review and/or update key decisions
3) Develop or review/update response priorities, limitations, ad constraints
4) Develop or review incident objectives; (Key SOFR input
Health and Safety of Response Personnel)
5) Develop or review/update key procedures which may
include:
a. Managing sensitive information;
b. Information flow;
c. Resource order (Key SOFR should know how to request safety/health equipment, safety and health personnel,
etc.);
d. Cost sharing and cost accounting; and
e. Operational security issues
6) Develop or review/update tasks for command and
general staff to accomplish
7) Agree on the division of UC workload
8) Prepare for the command and general staff meeting
19
20
Meeting Agenda:
1) PSC brings meeting to order, conducts roll call, covers
ground rules, and reviews agenda
2) SITL conducts situation status briefing
3) IC/UC provides the following:
a. Provides comments;
b. Reviews key decisions, priorities, constraints and limitations (if new or changed);
c. Discusses incident objectives;
d. Reviews key procedures (if new or changed); and
e. Assigns or reviews functional tasks/open actions.
4) PSC facilitates open discussion to clarify priorities,
objectives, assignments, issues, concerns and open
actions/tasks
5) IC/UC provides closing comments.
21
22
23
TACTICS MEETING
This is a 30-minute meeting with the intent of providing operational input into the developing IAP. The OSC should
present the work analysis matrix (ICS-334 Form) and present
the operational planning worksheet (ICS-215 Form). The
SOFR or designated representative should then present the
draft hazard/risk analysis worksheet (ICS-215a). Input from
the attendees is vital to ensure that the tactics is sound and
achievable.
When:
Facilitator:
Attendees:
24
Agenda:
1) PSC brings meeting to order, conducts roll call, covers
ground rules, and reviews agenda
2) SITL reviews the current and projected incident
situation
3) PSC reviews incident operational objectives and ensures
accountability for each
4) OSC reviews the work analysis matrix (ICS-234) strategy and tactics
5) OSC reviews and/or completes the operational planning worksheet (ICS-215), which addresses the work
assignments, resource commitments, contingencies,
and needed support facilities (e.g., staging areas)
6) OSC reviews and/or completes operations section
organization chart
7) SOFR reviews and/or completes the hazard risk analysis worksheet (ICS-215a) and identifies and resolves any
critical safety issues
8) Based upon the matrix and worksheets, the LSC
discusses and resolves any logistics issues
9) PSC validates connectivity of tactics and operational
objectives
25
26
27
Planning Meeting
This meeting provides an overview of the tactical plan to
achieve the IC/UCs current direction, priorities and objectives. The OSC will present the proposed plan to the command and general staff for review and comment. The OSC
will discuss strategy and tactics that were considered and
chosen to best meet the commands direction for the next operational period. The OSC will also briefly discuss how the
incident will be managed along with work assignments,
resources, and support required to implement the proposed
plan. This meeting provides the opportunity for the command and general staff to discuss and resolve any issues and
concerns prior to assembling the incident action plan (IAP).
After review and updates are made, planning meeting attendees commit to support the plan.
When:
Facilitator:
Attendees:
Agenda:
1) PSC brings meeting to order, conducts roll call, covers
ground rules and reviews agenda
2) IC/UC provides opening remarks
28
29
30
31
Operations Briefing
Agenda:
This 30-minute or less briefing presents the IAP to the operations section oncoming shift supervisors. After this briefing
has occurred and during a shift change, off-going supervisors should be interviewed by their relief and by the OSC in
order to validate the IAP effectiveness. The division/group
supervisor may make last minute adjustments to tactics over
which they have a purview. Similarly, a supervisor may reallocate resources within that division/group to adapt to
changing conditions.
When:
Facilitator:
Attendees:
32
33
Assess Progress
As the new operational period begins, the SOFR and staff
need to be out at the site talking with unit leaders, division/branch supervisors as well as keeping up-to-date on
the latest situation. New tasks or operations may occur, and
new contractors may suddenly appear performing work that
the SOFR was not aware of and has not had the opportunity
to assess. Continue to review the IAP and the site safety
plan. Identify areas to improve upon. Gather new information from air monitoring data, or simple field observations.
Improve, improve, and improve.
Reference
1. U.S. Coast Guard: U.S. Coast Guard Incident Management Handbook (COMDTPUB P3120.17A). Washington,
DC: U.S. Coast Guard, 2006.
34
ISHMH
Need for a Standardized Process
Avoiding a haphazard and inconsistent method of recognizing hazards and determining risks at an incident response is
essential. Although initial response actions warrant a quick
and dirty method of recognizing hazards and determining
risks, the SOFR and his/her staff need to begin quickly controlling the process. Otherwise, hazardous conditions are
likely to get missed or underestimated in their risks of a
mishap. Also, without a standardized process, various response entities, both private and government sector, will develop its own set of processes resulting in a myriad of
controls such as personal protective equipment.
Chapter 4
Hazard and Risk Analysis
Model (EAM) is the strategy for anticipating, recognizing,
evaluating, and controlling hazards in the workplace, and
should be the basis for protecting responders in an emergency response scenario.
Start
When initially starting the duties of an SOFR, one must first
begin with identifying and involving stakeholders. Questions to ask when receiving situational briefs include the
following:
What specific operations are occurring right now?
Search-and-rescue (for example)
> Simple walk through the neighborhood door-todoor, or
> Conducting confined space entries among debris
and rumble.
Hazardous material response (for example)
> Units on stand-by to allow the material to release
until the containers are empty, or
35
Basic Characterization
This process occurs both during field observation of an incident response operation and when the SOFRs staff gets together to share and compare notes of what they have seen.
Three areas to focus basic characterization efforts:
1) Tactical operations area(s). This area is likely to involve
the most activity and the most people. The hazards can
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
37
3)
4)
5)
6)
38
rotary wing aircraft. Fueling and maintenance operations should be examined for potential fire and explosion hazards. Generator set-up should be checked.
Table 4.1 Information Sources for Gathering Information(1)
Collection Methods
Type of Information
Walkaround survey
Operations occurring
Jobs or tasks of that operation
Personal protective equipment worn or
on-hand
Engineering controls used
Safe work practices used
Division of labor (who does what and when)
Environmental agents
Direct-reading instruments used and their
measurements
Review material safety data sheets, cargo
manifests, labels, and placards
After visiting the appropriate sites, talking with the appropriate people, and observing the operation in a shorttime frame, analysis of the findings is important.
Exposure Assessment
After initially identifying the jobs and tasks in addition to
the hazards, an SOFR can begin developing a health and
safety profile. The next step required to characterizing the
health and safety profile is estimating the likelihood of exposure to those hazards, and its variability from operational
period to another. Unlike a generally routine industrial operation, variability exists day-to-day based on the whether personnel are exposed to certain health and safety hazards.
In an incident response operation, initial exposure assessment will likely be heavily qualitative in nature. In other
words, most of the SOFR staff assessment of exposure will
rely heavily on observation, interviews, and professional
judgement versus air or dermal sampling results. Over the
length of the response, however, efforts should be made to
quantify these exposure assessments in order to validate initial estimates of exposure risks.
Health Risk Rating
For each hazard identified in a particular work assignment,
assess the health effects as a component of risk. Using the
AIHA Health Effects Rating scheme(1), rate the health effects
in the following category:
Category
4
3
2
1
0
Health Effect
39
ERR can be rated according to the following AIHA Exposure Risk Rating scheme:
Category
Exposure Rating
Categorization
Safety Hazard
Rating Category
> Occupational
Exposure Limit
50100% of OEL
High Risk of
Occurrence
1049% of OEL
Moderate Risk of
Occurrence
Low Risk of
Occurrence
based on physical and chemical properties of the environmental agents, but also, the response operations
process.
Controls used by the workers, either engineering, safe
work practices, and/or PPE and their observable effectiveness in controlling exposures.
For selecting the OELs for chemical exposures, refer to
the section on OELs in this handbook.
Risk Level
An SOFR can obtain the risk level quantitatively by simply
adding the category scores obtained from the ERR and HRR.
The higher the sum, the higher the risk level for that particular hazard.
Exposure Judgment
The SOFR must now determine if the exposure to health and
safety hazards identified are either
Acceptable: Hazard identified has been determined to
be low enough that risks associated with the exposure
are low. Though rated acceptable, the SOFR should continue to reassess the particular hazard to verify the acceptability judgment.
41
Unacceptable: Hazards identified have been determined to have an average exposure or the upper extremes of the exposure (e.g., peak) to be significantly
high exceeding the established OEL. For safety hazards,
these are typically hazards with a significantly high
health risk rating and a high risk of occurrence.
Uncertain: Insufficient data in either the associated response task or job, or information of the hazard may
warrant an SOFR to determine the hazard as uncertain.
Whereby unacceptable judgments assume that the SOFR
knows the specific hazards involved and therefore,
mechanisms of effective controls can be recommended,
uncertain exposure judgments warrant a high priority
for further surveys and other information gathering efforts in order to make the appropriate control recommendations.
42
Controls
After determining the risk categorizations and exposure
judgments, the SOFR should list the types of controls necessary. Even if further information gathering is required for an
uncertain judgment, the most conservative approaches to
PPE, engineering controls and safe work practices should be
determined and recommended.
The columns for controls are analogous to the ICS-215
form used by the planning and logistics section chiefs to determine resources to successfully perform a particular tactical operation. Controls are types of resources, even if the resources
are safe work practices or training. The importance of this portion of the form is that the SOFR is able to focus essential control resources to particular types of response operations rather
than haphazardly making generalities on the types of controls
that all response operational units have to undertake.
ICS-215A-AIHA Version
Block 7
There are two versions of the 215A available in this publication: the AIHA Version and the U.S. Coast Guard version.
Although the U.S. Coast Guard version is complaint with the
National Incident Management System (NIMS), either form
will effectively provide a comprehensive analysis of the
hazards and risks associated with an incident.
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
Block 1
Block 2
Block 3
Block 4
Block 5
Block 6
Block 6
ICS-215A-CG Version
Block 1
Block 2
Block 3
Block 4
Block 5
44
Block 7
Block 8
Reference
1. Ignacio, J.S. and W.H. Bullock (Eds.): A Strategy for Assessing and Managing Occupational Exposures, Third Edition. Fairfax, VA: AIHA, 2007.
45
47
ISHMH
Chapter 5
Site Safety and Health Plan
Purpose
The SSHP is required by state and federal OSHA regulations
to identify and present methods of controlling hazards in the
workplace. Incident response is not exempt from such regulations, and if any workplace required such a plan, incident
response operations would be the reason. These types of jobs
and tasks very often are complex, simultaneously executed,
and involve a myriad of government, private and volunteer
organizations. The need for one SSHP in a particular incident response operation is crucial.
Block 6:
Block 7:
Block 8:
50
Self-explanatory.
Indicate the division/group that this particular
SSHP page addresses. If other
divisions/groups are performing similar job
tasks/activity, all of them may be addressed on
the same page(s).
Block 9:
Block 10:
Self-Explanatory
Follow the instructions indicated in block 9.
Emphasis is simplicity for the response personnel to know where the work zones, the significant hazards, the perimeter security, refuge
locations, decon line, and evacuation routes
ought to be. Additional pages and diagrams
may be required if the site is very large and/or
many hazards are identified in just one portion
of the site.
working this plan in a vacuum. Do not make up signals and alarms or assume that assets are available onsite to do emergency decontamination or site security if
they are not actually present.
Reference
1. U.S. Coast Guard: U.S. Coast Guard Incident Management Handbook (COMDTPUB P3120.17A). Washington,
DC: U.S. Coast Guard, 2006.
52
ISHMH
FORM NAME
Site Safety & Health Plan
USE
Site Safety & Health Plan for Incident
REQUIRED
OPTIONAL
ATTACHED?
SSHP-A
SSHP-B
SSHP-C
53
1. Incident Name
2. Date/Time Prepared
3. Operational Period
5. Division/Group:
7. Site Accessibility
Land Water Air
Comments:
Hazards*
Exposure Routes
4. Safety Officer
(include method of contact)
Controls: Engineering,
Administrative, PPE
Inhalation
Absorption
Ingestion
Injection
Membrane
Inhalation
Absorption
Ingestion
Injection
Membrane
54
Inhalation
Absorption
Ingestion
Injection
Membrane
Inhalation
Absorption
Ingestion
Injection
Membrane
Inhalation
Absorption
Ingestion
Injection
Membrane
55
1. Incident Name
2. Date/Time Prepared
3. Operational Period
5. Division/Group:
7. Site Accessibility
Land Water Air
Comments:
56
4. Safety Officer
(include method of contact)
57
SSHP EMERGENCY
RESPONSE PLAN
1. Incident Name
2. Date/Time Prepared
3. Operational Period
4. Safety Officer
(include method of contact)
5. Division/Group:
8. Attachments:
58
59
RESPONSE WORKER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
4. Type of Briefing
1. Incident Name
2. Site Location:
3. Attachments:
5. Presented By:
6. Date
7. Time
Signature*
Date
Time
Safety Plan/Emergency
Response Plan
Start Shift
Pre-Entry
Exit
End of Shift
Specify Other:
8. Worker Name (Print)
* By signing this document, I am stating that I have read and fully understand the plan and/or information provided to me.
60
ENTRY PLAN
1. Incident Name
2. Date/Time Prepared
3. Operational Period
4. Attachments: MSDSs
5. Branch/Group:
6. Supervisor
8. Backup Team:
10. Physical Hazards & Protection (Specific Job/Task, Associated Hazards, and Types of Controls to Implement)
SEE SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN
11. SITE DIAGRAM/MAP: Include Work Zones, Location of Hazards, Security Perimeter, Decontamination Line Set-Up, Evac Routes, Muster Points,
Directional North, Wind Direction
61
a Hotline Area
Instrument Drop-Off
Contaminated Trash Drop-Off
Other:
Clothing Change-Out
Other: _______________________________________________________
16. Communications: Radio Primary Freq: ______; Secondary Freq:______; Primary Phone#:_____________ Secondary hone#:________________
17. Site Security: Organization Name
___________________________________________________
Location:______________________
Contact#:______________________
Location:______________________
Contact#:______________________
62
RESPONSE WORKER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
TO HAZMAT ENTRY PLAN
1. Incident Name
4. Type of Briefing
2. Site Location:
3. Attachments:
5. Presented By:
6. Date
7. Time
Signature*
Date
Time
Pre-Entry
8. Worker Name (Print)
* By signing this document, I am stating that I have read and fully understand the plan and/or information provided to me.
ISHMH
Chapter 6
Air Monitoring Planning and Execution
Introduction
The guidelines in this chapter provide an overarching field
guide to what can be a very complex or very simple operational task, depending upon the size and complexity of an
incident response.
The SOFR should work with the assigned environmental
unit, under the planning section, in developing, conducting,
and assessing air monitoring plans, and data analysis. An environmental unit would normally be managed, at the federal
level, by either the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) or the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS). The SOFR should not be developing or conducting its
own air monitoring work independent of the environmental
unit. This will only cause miscommunication, and may result
in partial assessment of the overall responders respiratory
exposure. Although the SOFR should obtain and retain
copies of all air monitoring plans and results, particularly
those results taken from responders, the central repository of
all air monitoring results should be the environmental unit.
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
4-in-1, with alarm capabilities. Environmental area monitoring does provide augmented support for air monitoring, but
depending upon the location of such monitors in relation to
the response workers, alert of increasing or dangerous levels
may or may not occur.
Initial entry teams using real-time gas and vapor monitoring equipment with PID, OVA, or IR to monitor levels at
single or multiple point sources are extremely valuable not
only for helping to identify the hazardous substances, but
also to ascertain the levels.
Levels of Concern(1)
1. Oxygen levels 19.5% are oxygen-deficient while levels
22.0% are a fire and explosion risk;
2. Explosivity levels measured 1% indicate explosive atmospheres of a highly volatile and potentially explosive
gas or vapor. Levels 10% are dangerous.
3. Carbon Monoxide:
NIOSH REL: TWA 35 ppm (40 mg/m3); Ceiling 200 ppm
(229 mg/m3)
OSHA PEL: TWA 50 ppm (55 mg/m3)
4. Hydrogen Sulfide:
NIOSH REL: Ceiling 10 ppm (15 mg/m3) [10-minute]
OSHA PEL: Ceiling 20 ppm; 50 ppm [10-minute maximum peak]
American Industrial Hygiene Association
Figures 6.1 and 6.2 provide an air monitoring log and a sample, respectively, on how to summarize any air monitoring
results.
The SOFRs should ensure that hazardous materials
units, assigned technical specialists or the ASOFs performing
air monitoring provide the following information in writing:
General
An air monitoring plan should be created if continuous air
monitoring on-scene needs to continue during additional operational periods.
The air monitoring plan should be developed using either the initial air monitoring equipment used by the arriving hazardous materials response teams and/or additional
sampling or collection media often used by industrial hygienists.
All air monitoring being conducted and recorded as
part of an incident response needs to be included in the plan
and the air monitoring results must be recorded accurately.
The air monitoring plan needs to be simple to develop,
yet comprehensively identify the types of monitoring occurring on-site. The more extensive sampling and collection
media protocols used by industrial hygienists or environmental specialists should be written in a formal report.
67
1. Incident Name
2. Date/Time Prepared
7. Date/Time:
3. Operational Period
Instructions:
List each contaminant monitored or detected.
1. Incident Name
Destroyed finance
building at 23 Oak St/
Demolition
Oxygen
LEL
Hydrogen Sulfide
Carbon Monoxide
2. Date/Time Prepared
3. Operational Period
20.3% Oxygen
0.3% LEL
1.5 ppm
1.0 ppm
Personal worn by
demolition supervisor
on-site;
Mr. IH Technician
Benxene
Mr. IH
Benzo(a)Pyrenes
Mr. IH Consultant
7. Date/Time:
Instructions:
List each contaminant monitored or detected.
69
A very simple example of an air monitoring plan is exhibited in Figure 6.4. Note that multiple hazards to be monitored in the same site location or even same job/task
should be listed separately. This helps differentiate the results in the air monitoring results, which is explained later
in this chapter.
1. Incident Name
5b. Job/Task to be
Monitored
2. Date/Time Prepared
5c. Hazard to be
Monitored
7. Date/Time:
3. Operational Period
Instructions:
List each hazard separately even if site location and/or job/task is the same..
5f. Person(s)
Responsible
71
1. Incident Name
5b. Job/Task to be
Monitored
2. Date/Time Prepared
5c. Hazard to be
Monitored
3. Operational Period
5f. Person(s)
Responsible
Tanker Leak
Clean-up Operation
Explosion Levels
Personal 3 each
Craig Ethylene
Unit Supervisor
Tanker Leak
Clean-up Operation
Benzene Levels
Personal 3 each
Contamination Reduction
Zone
Decontamination Team
Benzene Levels
Charcoal tubes on air sampling pumps for area monitor using NIOSH Method
3700; 30 minutes;
Area
Dorothy Tenax, CIH
1 positioned at entry point Tech Specialist - IH
(hot side); 1 positioned at
exit point (cold side)
7. Date/Time:
23 Oct 2xxx
Instructions:
List each hazard separately even if site location and/or job/task is the same..
77
References:
1. Hawley, C.: Hazardous Materials Air Monitoring and Detection Devices. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Thomson
Learning, 2002.
2. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA):
2008 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPG) and
Workplace Environmental Exposure Levels (WEEL) Handbook. Fairfax, VA: AIHA, 2008.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Acute
Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs). Washington, DC:
EPA,2007. Available at http://www.epa.gov/oppt/
aegl/. Accessed April 3, 2008.
4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health,
Safety, and Security: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with
AEGLs, ERPGs, & TEELs: Rev. 23 for Chemicals of Concern.
Washington, DC: DOE, 2007. Available at
http://www.atlintl.com/DOE/teels/teel.html.
Accessed April 3, 2008.
5. American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH): Threshold Limit Values for Chemical
Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, 2007
78
ISHMH
Annex A
Glossary of Terms Related to Air Monitoring
References:
1. Martinez, T.B.: Industrial Hygiene Desk Reference Guide.
Fairfax, VA: AIHA, 2007.
2. Centers for Disease Control (CDC)/National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): NIOSH
Manual of Analytical Methods. Washington, DC: NIOSH,
1994.
3. Bevelacqua, A.S.: Hazardous Materials Chemistry. Clifton
Park, NY: Delmar Thomson Learning, 2005.
81
ISHMH
Annex B
Basic Air Sampling Concept Reference Guide
Ci =
Ti =
Tf =
where
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
83
References:
1. Bevelacqua, A.S.: Hazardous Materials Chemistry. Clifton
Park, NY: Delmar Thomson Learning, 2005.
2. Martinez, T.B.: Industrial Hygiene Desk Reference Guide.
Fairfax, VA: AIHA, 2007.
84
ISHMH
Introduction
Decontamination should only be done by trained personnel
equipped with the appropriate equipment. Every incident
response will be unique, requiring or not requiring decontamination and/or adjustment to current standing operating
procedures.
Although there are a myriad of considerations to developing specific decontamination procedures, this guidance attempts to provide an all-hazards approach for an SOFR to
assess and evaluate the appropriateness and adequacy of a
decontamination operation. It does not discuss in detail
mass decontamination, building decontamination, forensics
decontamination, and others. Specific decontamination procedures are required for any specific incident response.
Basic Terminology
Contamination: The physical contact of a hazardous substance to humans, or to equipment.
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
Chapter 7
Decontamination Guidelines
Secondary or Cross-Contamination: The physical transfer of hazardous materials from an individual or object to another individual or object.
d.
Decontamination Solutions
Decontamination solutions will very seldom be employed,
unless in an industrial facility or for use on equipment. The
range of the solutions run from hot, soapy water solutions to
neutralizing agents.
Visual Observation
By using natural light, artificial light, or ultraviolet light, this
method can be used to detect remaining dirt, stains, discolorations, or clothing fabric alterations indicative of contaminant residue.
If the decontamination solutions pose harmful characteristics, visual observations could also be used to verify that
no remaining decontaminant exists on personnel, clothing,
and equipment.
Chemical Removal
After physical removal of gross contamination, employ a
wash/rinse process using the appropriate cleaning solutions.
Categories of decontamination solutions run parallel to the
types of physical removal methods. There are solidifying solutions, surfactants, rinsing solutions, solutions that can dissolve the contaminant, disinfection solutions, and
neutralization solutions.
Wipe Sampling
Various methods can be used to either identify residue contaminants by colorimetric changes on the wiping media or
analysis in a laboratory.
If the response or recovery operation could be hampered by the delay, methods requiring laboratory analysis
are the least desirable. On-site field monitoring methods
could be used, but the SOFR should still verify the validity
88
Decontamination Plan
As part of a site safety and health plan, a decontamination
plan should be developed before any personnel or equipment enters areas where potential exposures to hazardous
substances exist. When reviewing a decontamination plan,
the following items should be described:
1. The decontamination stations layout and number;
2. Decontamination equipment required;
3. Disposal method for clothing and equipment not fully
decontaminated;
4. Procedures to remove clothing and equipment while
minimizing or preventing contact with hazardous substances;
5. Control points to prevent contamination of clean areas;
6. Personal protective equipment level of the decontamination personnel (Level A, B, C), understanding that the
rule of thumb for decontamination personnel is to either
be at the equivalent OSHA PPE level as the entry team
or one level below;
7. If the decontamination plan is to be used for the next
operational period, determine if the current plan requires updating based on changes in the weather, the
presence or absence of hazardous substances, or other
factors;
89
8. Decontamination method for the decontamination personnel and equipment after the operation is completed;
9. Change-out procedures for breathing bottles, entry team
personnel, or equipment for the entry team;
10. Contingency to perform rapid emergency decontamination for entry team personnel in a non-ambulatory (litter
required) or ambulatory manner; and
11. Medical aid support available (note: SOFR should review the medical plan to ensure that it covers the entry
and decontamination teams).
Figure 7.3 General Deliberate Decontamination Layout.(1) From National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Coast Guard, and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site
Activities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985.
90
Decontamination Methods
While reviewing the site set-up and the decontamination
plan, consider the following factors:
1. Use of incompatible decontaminants with the hazardous
substance being removed from personnel and equipment;
2. Incompatible clothing and equipment being decontaminated with either the decontaminant or the hazardous
substance(s) involved in the response. (Note: clothing
and equipment compatibility should have been identified during the risk analysis); and
3. Vapor, liquid, flammability, and explosion issues associated with the hazardous substances involved in the response. Note that the same hazards encountered with
an entry team will be faced in the decontamination line.
Decontamination Line Set-Up
Regardless of the chemical, biological, or radiological agent
involved in an incident response, an SOFR could use the
conservative approach used in deliberate entries at a hazardous waste site. Tailoring back the set-up could always be
performed as deemed appropriate by the SOFR after a thorough risk analysis.
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
Figure 7.4 and 7.5 From National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Coast Guard, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):
Occupational Safety and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, 1985.
92
the entry team. If the hazards, process, and risks are controlled sufficiently, the decontamination personnel may go
one level below the protection level of the entry team. For
example, if the entry team is in OSHA Level A, the decontamination team could be in Level A initially, then downgraded to Level B.
During the hazard risk analysis, the first one or two
personnel to encounter the entry team as they enter the decontamination line will have the most exposure to the hazardous substances involved in the incident.
The level of protection required will vary with the type
of decontamination equipment used. The cleaning solutions
used and the wastes produced could produce elevated levels
of vapors.(1)
Reference
1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Coast Guard, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Occupational Safety
and Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 1985.
93
ISHMH
Introduction
Respiratory protection equipment and usage will most likely be
dictated by the types of respiratory hazards identified or suspected at an incident. Regardless of the type and use of the respiratory protection, the safety officer must establish a consistent
respiratory protection level applicable to all organizations or individuals working in and/or around an incident site.
This chapter intends to highlight important respiratory
protection information that a safety officer or staff may need
when determining and implementing the appropriate respiratory protection levels. Department of Defense (DOD) personnel may be exempt under their current regulations in
complying with general industry respiratory protection requirements. DOD personnel, however, should still practice
proper wear and maintenance of their assigned respirators.
Chapter 8
Respiratory Protection
General use conditions, including determination of contaminant(s);
Physical, chemical, and toxicological properties of the
contaminant(s);
Type of exposure standards to be used (see previous
chapter);
Expected concentration of each respiratory hazard;
Immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) concentrations;
Oxygen concentration or expected oxygen concentration;
Eye irritation potential; and
Environmental factors, such as presence of oil aerosols.
Available direct-reading data or air sampling results
should be used to determine exposure levels found in the
incident site. A combination of air sampling and exposure
modeling is often used to make reasonable estimates of
exposure.
95
of respirator cartridges or devices, SOFR staff must enforce the need to fit-test using the approved respirator
model and size made available to the response operation.
3. Respirators with tight-fitting face-pieces, including pressure-demand respirators, should not be used when facial scars or deformities interfere with the face seal.
4. The usage limitations of air-purifying elements, particularly gas and vapor cartridges or canisters, should not
be exceeded (see NIOSH Certified Equipment List for
general limitations at
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/cel).
5. Respirators must be certified by NIOSH.(2) A list of
tested and approved respirators can be found at
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/cel/. The only exception is the use of Department
of Defense Chemical, Biological, and Radiological (CBR)
respirators for use by authorized military or authorized
DOD civilian personnel. Military personnel assigned
with commercial NIOSH-approved respirators on-site
shall be fit-tested on the particular model and size.
6. The safety officer determines the appropriate respiratory protection level. The responding organizations and
American Industrial Hygiene Association
agencies are responsible for maintaining a written respiratory protection program, which covers the selection,
training, cleaning, storage, maintenance and inspection
of those devices. The safety officer and staff will be responsible for conducting spot checks in the field for
compliance with the determined respiratory protection
level, compliance with fit-testing, and that the respirator
devices are in good working order.
7. In large incident responses, there will often be large contingents of recovery personnel performing demolition,
clean-up, or material handling, which may require respiratory protection. If respiratory protection is mandated and many of these personnel have not been
previously qualified medically, been issued respiratory
protection devices by their current employer, or even fittested, the safety officer may need to direct on-site training, fit-testing, and medical qualification by an
occupational medical physician. This can be very time
intensive, and should be planned and coordinated effectively.
WeW
We
Co Cx
ln
C
Q
k
C
o
v o
Cx
tb =
We =
W=
rb =
Q=
Co =
Cx =
Quarter Mask
Half Mask
Full Face
Helmet/Hood
Loose-Fitting
Air Purifying
10 c
50
PAPR
50
1,000
25/1,000 d
25
Demand
Continuous Flow
Pressure Demand/ other (+) pressure
10
50
50
50
1,000
1,000
25/1,000 d
25
Demand
Pressure Demand/ other (+) pressure
10
50
10,000
50
10,000
SAR
SAR
May use respirators assigned for higher concentrations in lower concentrations or when required use is independent of concentration.
These APFs are only effective when employer has a continuing, effective respirator program per 1910.134.
c
This APF category includes filtering facepieces and elastomeric facepieces.
d
Must have manufacturer test evidence to support an APF of 1,000 or else these respirators receive an APF of 25.
e
These APFs do not apply to escape-only respirators. Escape respirators must conform to 1910.134(d)(2)(ii) or OSHAs substance specific standards, if
used with those substances.
b
98
Environmental Conditions
Increasing ambient temperatures can decrease the attractive
forces characteristic in the activated charcoal, while increasing humidity levels will increase the moisture absorbency in
the cartridge material. Both of these factors may decrease
the service life of the cartridges. Using the formula above, as
well as respirator manufacturer information, these corrections for environmental conditions should already be factored in the calculations.
Multiple Contaminants:
Respirator service life calculations are typically based on one
contaminant. In an emergency response situation, multiple
contaminants are likely to be present. From a conservative
standpoint, the SOFR should recommend the respirator device based on the most conservative estimate and most current information. In terms of determining the service life of
the cartridges, however, the SOFR should be aware of the
possibility that contaminants with less absorption characteristics on activated charcoal may be displaced by contaminants that have a higher absorption on the cartridge
material. Therefore, using the contaminants with the least
absorption characteristic could be used as the basis for determining service life.
99
Medical Qualification
Employees need to be medically cleared to wear respirators
before commencing use. Generally, all respirators place a
physiological burden on the employee. Negative pressure
respirators restrict breathing, some respirators can cause
claustrophobia, and self-contained breathing apparatuses are
heavy. Each of these conditions may adversely affect the
health of some employees who wear respirators. A physician
or other licensed health care professional operating within
Table 8.2 Appendix C to Sec. 1910.134: OSHA Respirator Medical Evaluation Questionnaire (Mandatory)
To the employer: Answers to questions in Section 1, and to question 9 in Section 2 of Part A, do not require a medical examination.
To the employee:
Can you read (circle one): Yes/No
Your employer must allow you to answer this questionnaire during normal working hours, or at a time and place that is convenient to you. To maintain your
confidentiality, your employer or supervisor must not look at or review your answers, and your employer must tell you how to deliver or send this questionnaire to the health care professional who will review it.
Part A. Section 1. (Mandatory) The following information must be provided by every employee who has been selected to use any type of respirator
(please print).
1. Todays date:_______________________________________________________
2. Your name:__________________________________________________________
100
101
5. Have you ever had any of the following cardiovascular or heart problems?
a. Heart attack: Yes/No
b. Stroke: Yes/No
c. Angina: Yes/No
d. Heart failure: Yes/No
e. Swelling in your legs or feet (not caused by walking): Yes/No
f. Heart arrhythmia (heart beating irregularly): Yes/No
g. High blood pressure: Yes/No
h. Any other heart problem that youve been told about: Yes/No
6. Have you ever had any of the following cardiovascular or heart symptoms?
a. Frequent pain or tightness in your chest: Yes/No
b. Pain or tightness in your chest during physical activity: Yes/No
c. Pain or tightness in your chest that interferes with your job: Yes/No
d. In the past two years, have you noticed your heart skipping or missing a beat: Yes/No
e. Heartburn or indigestion that is not related to eating: Yes/ No
f. Any other symptoms that you think may be related to heart or circulation problems: Yes/No
7. Do you currently take medication for any of the following problems?
a. Breathing or lung problems: Yes/No
b. Heart trouble: Yes/No
c. Blood pressure: Yes/No
d. Seizures (fits): Yes/No
8. If youve used a respirator, have you ever had any of the following problems? (If youve never used a respirator, check the following space and go to
question 9:)
a. Eye irritation: Yes/No
b. Skin allergies or rashes: Yes/No
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
103
c. Anxiety: Yes/No
d. General weakness or fatigue: Yes/No
e. Any other problem that interferes with your use of a respirator: Yes/No
9. Would you like to talk to the health care professional who will review this questionnaire about your answers to this questionnaire: Yes/No
Questions 10 to 15 below must be answered by every employee who has been selected to use either a full-facepiece respirator or a self-contained
breathing apparatus (SCBA). For employees who have been selected to use other types of respirators, answering these questions is voluntary.
10. Have you ever lost vision in either eye (temporarily or permanently): Yes/No
11. Do you currently have any of the following vision problems?
a. Wear contact lenses: Yes/No
b. Wear glasses: Yes/No
c. Color blind: Yes/No
d. Any other eye or vision problem: Yes/No
12. Have you ever had an injury to your ears, including a broken ear drum: Yes/No
13. Do you currently have any of the following hearing problems?
a. Difficulty hearing: Yes/No
b. Wear a hearing aid: Yes/No
c. Any other hearing or ear problem: Yes/No
14. Have you ever had a back injury: Yes/No
15. Do you currently have any of the following musculoskeletal problems?
a. Weakness in any of your arms, hands, legs, or feet: Yes/No
b. Back pain: Yes/No
c. Difficulty fully moving your arms and legs: Yes/No
d. Pain or stiffness when you lean forward or backward at the waist: Yes/No
e. Difficulty fully moving your head up or down: Yes/No
f. Difficulty fully moving your head side to side: Yes/No
104
105
4.
5.
6.
7.
107
c. Room to talk
d. Position of mask on face and cheeks
7. The following criteria shall be used to help determine
the adequacy of the respirator fit:
a. Chin properly placed
b. Adequate strap tension, not overly tightened
c. Fit across nose bridge
d. Respirator of proper size to span distance from
nose to chin
e. Tendency of respirator to slip
f. Self-observation in mirror to evaluate fit and
respirator position
8. The test subject shall conduct a user seal check, either
the negative and positive pressure seal checks described
in Appendix B-1 of this section or those recommended
by the respirator manufacturer that provides equivalent
protection to the procedures in Appendix B-1. Before
conducting the negative and positive pressure checks,
the subject shall be told to seat the mask on the face by
moving the head from side-to-side and up and down
slowly while taking in a few slow deep breaths. Another
face piece shall be selected and retested if the test subject fails the user seal check tests.
109
iv.
v.
111
References:
1. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH): NIOSH Respirator Selection Logic. Washington,
DC: NIOSH, 2004.
2. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA): OSHAs Respiratory Protection Standard 29 CFR
1910.134. Washington, DC: OSHA. Available at
http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/ote/trng-materials/
respirators/presentation/slide33.html. Accessed
April 7, 2008.
3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA): Respiratory Protection Advisor Factors that can
Reduce Cartridge Service Life. Washington, DC: OSHA.
Available at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/
respiratory/factors/factors.html. Accessed April 7, 2008.
4. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA): Appendix A to 1910.134: Fit Testing Procedures
(Mandatory). Washington, DC: OSHA, 2004.
5. Wood, G.O.: Estimating Service Lives of Organic Vapor
Cartridges, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 55(1):1115 (1994).
112
ISHMH
Chapter 9
Personal Protective Equipment
Introduction
This chapter provides a general overview of PPE often encountered in incident response or recovery operations, and
to cover basic selection and use. Like respiratory protection,
the responsibility to maintain and use this equipment resides
with the responding organization or agency, but the safety
officer needs to clearly identify and articulate the minimum
required PPE levels for the specific jobs/tasks at hand.
Specialized PPE like fall arrest, water safety, or chemical
protective clothing is very extensive and often is done by
trained professionals with the appropriate training, equipment, and written plans. Safety officers should coordinate
with these organizations to ensure that they have the proper
training, plans and proper equipment.
Head Protection
Class A
These are helmets intended to protect personnel from impact
force of falling objects and from electrical shock during conIncident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
Safety Spectacles
Safety spectacles are intended to shield the wearers eyes
from impact hazards such as flying fragments, objects, large
chips, and particles. Workers are required to use eye safety
spectacles with side shields when there is a hazard from flying objects. Non-side shield spectacles are not acceptable eye
protection for impact hazards. [1910.133(a)(2), 1915.153(a)(2)]
The frames of safety spectacles are constructed of metal
and/or plastic and can be fitted with either corrective or
plano impact-resistant lenses. Side shields may be incorporated into the frames of safety spectacles when needed.
Safety/Chemical Goggles
Safety goggle frames must be properly fitted to the workers
face to form a protective seal around the eyes. Poorly fitted
goggles will not offer the necessary protection.
Eye cup goggles must cover the eye sockets completely,
and are available with direct or indirect ventilation. They
may be rigid or flexible.
Cover safety goggles may be worn over corrective spectacles without disturbing the adjustment of the spectacles. They
can be available in direct, indirect, or non-ventilated types.
They may also be rigid or flexible. The non-ventilated goggles
should be used against chemical splash or chemical aerosols.
114
Face Shields
Face shields are intended to protect the entire face or portions of it from impact hazards such as flying fragments, objects, large chips, and particles. When worn alone, face
shields do not protect employees from impact hazards. Use
face shields in combination with safety spectacles or goggles,
even in the absence of dust or potential splashes, for additional protection beyond that offered by spectacles or goggles alone.
Face shield windows are made with different transparent materials and in varying degrees or levels of thickness.
These levels should correspond with specific tasks. Windows
are available in both removable and lift-front designs:
Removable windows allow the replacement of damaged
windows. Lift-front windows may be raised, as needed, or
left in the lowered position. They do protect against light impact, may include a glass insert, and are available in clear or
filtered. Wire-screen windows may include a plastic/glass
insert, and they do protect against some moderate impact.
However, they are not recommended for use involving
chemical or liquid hazards.
Headgear should support the window shield and secures the device to the head. Adjustable headgear would include straps that allow the user to manipulate the size of the
American Industrial Hygiene Association
Hearing Protection(3)
Expandable foam plugs
These plugs are made of a formable material designed to expand and conform to the shape of each persons ear canal.
Roll the expandable plugs into a thin, crease-free cylinder.
Pre-molded, reusable plugs
Pre-molded plugs are made from silicone, plastic, or rubber
and are manufactured as either one-size-fits-most or are
available in several sizes. Many pre-molded plugs are available in sizes for small, medium, or large ear canals. A critical
tip about pre-molded plugs is that a person may need a different size plug for each ear. The plugs should seal the ear
canal without being uncomfortable.
Earmuffs
Earmuffs come in many models designed to fit most people.
They work to block out noise by completely covering the
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
outer ear. Muffs can be low profile, with small ear cups, or
large, to hold extra materials for use in extreme noise. Some
muffs also include electronic components to help users communicate or to block impulsive noises.
Evaluating Noise Reduction Rating in the Field(4)
To estimate field noise reduction ratings versus using a manufacturers NRR, NIOSH recommends the following de-rating values:
Earmuffs:
Formable
earplugs:
All other
earplugs:
Using noise survey data, in dBC rating, the known effective A-weighted noise level is calculated the following:
dBA = dBC derated NRR
Using the noise survey data, in dBA rating, the known
effective A-weighted noise level is calculated the following:
dBA = dBA (derated NRR 7)
115
Tear strength
Tensile strength
Flammability
Cut resistance
Abrasion resistance
Puncture resistance
Thicker material is more protective at the expense of finger and hand dexterity and tactility.
Once compromised, the CPC will continue to absorb the
chemical.
Once torn, cut, or damaged, the CPC will not be as effective against chemical adsorption.
There is universally protective clothing against all
chemicals.
Verify with manufacturers instructions if there are required storage requirements or shelf-life issues.
AIHAs Chemical Protective Clothing is a recommended
reference resource for a safety officer to have.
References
1. Krieger, G.R. and J.F. Montgomery (Eds.): Accident
Prevention Manual: Engineering Technology, 11th Edition.
Itasca, IL: National Safety Council, 1997.
2. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA): Safety and Health Topics: Eye and Face Protection.
Washington, DC: OSHA. Available at
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/eyefaceprotection/index.
html. Accessed April 7, 2008.
117
ISHMH
ISHMH
Appendix I
Cold Injury Prevention Quick Reference
Hazards
Cold air temperatures combined with high air velocity
(e.g., wind or in uncovered moving), and moisture (e.g.,
perspiration or physical water contact).
Hypothermia: Core body temperature drops below
98.6F, and the person begins to shiver or stomp their
feet to stay warm, begins losing physical coordination,
exhibits slurred speech, or hands begin to fumble.
Frostbite: Skin actually freezes, and typically, occurs
when air temperatures are 30F and below.
Trench Foot: Caused by feet immersed or remains constantly wet, with water at temperatures above freezing
for long periods.
Evaluation
Refer to Figure I.1 for the wind chill temperatures chart.
Controls
Engineering controls:
Radiant heaters and warming shelters
Incident Safety and Health Management Handbook (ISHMH)
PPE
Safe Work Practices
Reference
1. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA): OSHA Emergency Preparedness and Response:
Safety and Health Guides Cold Stress. Washington, DC:
OSHA, 2005.