Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
6.1
InnoSuTra
1/10
2008-11-25
There are rewards for successful innovation and punishment for failing to innovate. But the
new product development process must be managed properly so that the risks are
minimised and profits are maximised. This text is designed to help you understand the
NPD methods necessary to introduce successful new products.
InnoSupport: Supporting Innovations in SME. 6.1 New product development methods, 2005
InnoSuTra
2/10
2008-11-25
result, companies and especially SMEs are increasingly dependent on revenues from new
products to drive their growth and sometimes sustain their existence. The rapid
development of new technologies, the shift change in customer needs and attributes, and
the gradual increase of the competition in the knowledge economy has forced all
businesses and particularly the innovative sectors to adopt NPD as a necessary and
unavoidable business practice. However, NPD is a complex and time-consuming process,
which cannot be taken lightly, since it holds more perils than first meets the eye. According
to David S. Hopkins and Earl L. Baily, research has shown that 40% of new consumer
products, 20% of new industrial products and 18% of new services related products have
failed completely as products3.
Did you know that in most markets and especially those relating to consumer
products, the number of new product introductions per annum has increased
dramatically? For example, a study into the consumer packaged goods market
showed that new product introductions had increased around tenfold over an 18-year
period.4 Driven by consumer demand and fuelled by advances in technology, SMEs have
to bring more and more products to market in order to remain competitive. SMEs best able
to execute NPD will clearly have an advantage and this is partly about reducing time to
market but also about making effective use of scarce internal resources.
InnoSupport: Supporting Innovations in SME. 6.1 New product development methods, 2005
Tidd, J., J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt, 2001
5
InnoSupport: Supporting Innovations in SME. 6.1 New product development methods, 2005
4
InnoSuTra
3/10
2008-11-25
generation and selection and how projects then evolve through the subsequent steps of
product design, prototyping and testing, and pilot production to end up in manufacturing
ramp-up and release, all taking place under decreasing levels of uncertainty which
simultaneously means reduced flexibility- as the development phases unfold over time.
One of the most widespread and well-accepted conceptual descriptions of the NPD
process is that of Clark & Fujimoto (1991) who identify five successive but overlapping
stages of the process:
Concept Generation where designers and product planners define the character of the
product from a customer's perspective.
Product Planning where the concept is translated into specifics for detailed design,
including major specifications, technical choices and cost targets.
Product Engineering where product plans are transformed into blueprints or CADdrawings then into prototypes and ultimately into real parts and components.
Process Engineering where the manufacturing tools that will realise the product are
developed and material flows, plant lay out, work organisation and tasks are defined.
Production Process where final products are made and assembled for the end
customer. The NPD process then ends with feedback into the product and process
engineering steps from ramp-up production and pre-series.
InnoSupport: Supporting Innovations in SME. 6.1 New product development methods, 2005
InnoSuTra
4/10
2008-11-25
Another widely used model is the stage-gate model of new product development (Cooper
et al, 2002) which we introduced in 6.1.1. It identifies a series of development stages,
similar to the ones described above, but complements these models by explicitly
identifying a series of evaluation gates through which a new product project has to pass
from idea to commercial launch. The stage-gate model creates discipline in the NPD
process by requiring periodic systemic review of projects at multiple milestones in the
development cycle.
Hughes & Chafin (1996) propose a final complementary dimension they call the value
proposition process (VPP), consisting of keeping managers focused on four critical
issues/questions: capturing market value (answering the question "does the customer
care?"); developing business value (answering "do we care?"); delivering winning solution
(answering "can we beat the competition?"); and applying project and process planning
(answering "can we do it?").
Keeping these questions on the top of the development agenda, calls for continuous
performance monitoring from a customer satisfaction-, a financial-, a strategic
management-, and a process management perspective. Figure 2 illustrates the product
development process integrating and building on the steps of Clark & Fujimoto, the
product development funnel, the stage-gate model, and the value proposition process.
Has any of the above mentioned NPD methods been used in your
organisation? In your opinion, what benefits would arise from adapting New
Product Development methods for your organisation?
Required definitions
The stages7: Stages are where the action occurs. The members of the project
team undertake key tasks to gather information needed to advance the project
to the next gate or decision point. Stages are cross-functional: There is no R&D
or marketing stage. Rather each stage consists of a set of parallel activities undertaken by
people from different functional areas in the firm, working together as a team and led by a
project team leader.
To manage risk via a stage gate method, the parallel activities in a certain stage must be
designed to gather vital information - technical, market, financial, operations in order to
drive down the technical arid business risks. Each stage costs more than the preceding
one, so that the game plan is based on incremental commitments. As uncertainties
decrease, expenditures are allowed to mount and risk is managed.
InnoSuTra
5/10
2008-11-25
The gates:8 Preceding each stage is an entry gate or go/kill decision point,
shown in the diagram. Effective gates are central to the success of a fast-paced,
new product process:
Gates serve as quality control checkpoints: Is this project being executed in a quality
fashion?
Gates also serve as Go/Kill and prioritisation decision points. Gates provide the funnels
where mediocre projects are successively culled.
Finally, gates are where the path forward for the next stage is decided, along with resource
commitments. Gate meetings are usually staffed by senior managers from different
functions, who own the resources, the project leader and team required for the next stage.
These decision-makers are called gatekeepers.
8
9
InnoSuTra
6/10
2008-11-25
10
InnoSupport: Supporting Innovations in SME. 6.1 New product development methods, 2005
InnoSuTra
7/10
2008-11-25
This team needed a product development process that would help them manage critical
risk without slowing them down. According to a business consultant who helped
ENERGEX, We were initially surprised by the call from ENERGEX - energy retailing is a
long way from our usual customers in manufacturing. After initial discussions, the product
development environment at ENERGEX was reviewed. This involved structured interviews
with both the users and customers of the current product development process. A review
or audit of the existing environment is always a critical starting point for any product
development process. Any issues can be brought to light and the existing process
elements can be captured and related to the organisations objectives.
According to the business consultant the results of the ENERGEX Retail review were
positive. We found high-energy teams passionate about their industry, their business and
the need to move at lightning speed in a fast-paced industry. We also found product
development processes that had much in common with those of our traditional
customers. While much of the existing process was very thorough, it had two significant
characteristics. Firstly there was a mismatch with the fast-moving culture of ENERGEX,
and secondly there were inefficient mechanisms for filtering and prioritising projects and
allocating precious resources.
In addition, Product Managers and the Product Development Manager were dissatisfied
with the quality of pre-development homework and wanted improvements in the quality of
product definition and specification before committing to development of new products.
InnoSuTra
8/10
2008-11-25
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Tidd, J., J. Bessant, and K. Pavitt, (2001), Managing innovation (2nd edition)
John Wiley and Sons, (1995), Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, Chichester
SAP A.G, (2004), New Product Development & Introduction
Dr. Robert G. Cooper, (2001), Doing right-Winning with New Products, Stage Gate Inc,
Product Development Institute
B2B International, last viewed 01 December 2008,
<http://www.b2binternational.com/case8.html>
QMI Solutions, 2008, last viewed 01 December 2008, <http://www.qmisolutions.com.au>
InnoSupport: Supporting Innovations in SME. 6.1 New product development methods,
2005, viewed 18th November 2008, <http://archive.innosupport.net>
GLOSSARY
Stage-GateTM process: A widely employed product development process that divides the
development effort into distinct time-sequenced stages or phases separated by
management decision gates. Product teams must successfully complete a prescribed set
of related activities in each stage prior to obtaining management approval to proceed to
the next stage of product development. The framework of the Stage-Gate process
includes work-flow and decision-flow paths and defines the supporting systems and
practices necessary to ensure the processs ongoing smooth operation.
Stage: One group of concurrently-accomplished tasks, with specified outcomes and
deliverables, of the overall product development process.
Gate: The decision point, often a meeting, at which a management decision is made to
allow the product development project to proceed to the next stage, to recycle back into
the current stage to better complete some of the tasks, or to terminate. The number of
gates varies by company.
Gatekeepers: The group of managers who serve as advisors, decision-makers and
resource allocators in a stage-gate process. They use established criteria to review
product development projects at each gate. This multifunctional group is generally most
visible at these gate meetings. See: Stakeholders.
CAD: Computer Aided Design, a technology that allows designers and engineers to use
computers for their design work. Also termed CAID (industrial design), and CAE
(engineering).
InnoSuTra
10/10
2008-11-25