Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Vertical Alignment 1
CE 416 Lecture 6
Vertical Alignment 1
CE416
Vertical Alignment
Grade line
Ground
level GL
Vertical Alignment
Cut
Fill
CE416
Grade / Gradient
Gradient is the rate of rise or fall along the length of the road with
respect to the horizontal.
While aligning a highway, the gradient is decided for designing the
vertical curve.
Representation of gradient
The positive gradient or the ascending gradient is denoted as +G and
the negative gradient as-G .
The deviation angle A is: when two grades meet, the angle which
measures the change of direction and is given by the algebraic difference
between the two grades
(G1-(-G2))=G1+G2= g1+ g2 .
Example:
1
100
CE416
Vertical Alignment
G = Grade = gradient
= rise / run
= percent (%)
= decimal ( 0.00)
For example:
G = + 1% or g = 0.01 , 1m rise in 100 m horizontal distance
G = - 3% or g = - 0.03 , 3m drop in 100 m horizontal distance
+ G or +g upward , upgrade , ascending grade
- G or - g downward , down grade , descending grade
Vertical Alignment
Vertical Curve
+ G1
-G2
+G4
+G3
CE416
Grades
Types of gradients
G1
Gmax
G2
G3
Gd
Gn-1
Gn
Gmin
Ruling gradient
The ruling gradient or the design gradient is the maximum gradient with
which the designer attempts to design the vertical profile of the road.
This depends on the terrain, length of the grade, speed, pulling power of
the vehicle and the presence of the horizontal curve.
In flatter terrain, it may be possible to provide flat gradients, but in hilly
terrain it is not economical and sometimes not possible also.
The ruling gradient is adopted by the designer by considering a
particular speed as the design speed and for a design vehicle with
standard dimensions.
CE416
Maximum Grades
Passenger cars : 4% to 5% no problem
Upgrades: trucks average 7% decrease in speed
Downgrades: trucks average speed increase 5%
Maximum grade selection depends on speed and terrain
Speed (km/h)
110
50
7 - 12
60 - 100
11
Minimum grades
uncurbed highways
where the cross slope is adequate to drain the pavement surface
laterally, flat profile may be used with no problem
curbed highways or streets
longitudinal grades should be provided to facilitate surface
drainage.
An appropriate minimum grade is typically 0.5 percent
grades of 0.30 percent may be used where there is a high-type
pavement accurately sloped and supported on firm subgrade. Use
of even flatter grades may be justified in special cases.
12
CE416
Effect of gradient
The effect of long steep gradient on the vehicular speed is considerable.
This is particularly important in roads where the proportion of heavy
vehicles is significant.
Due to restrictive sight distance at uphill gradients the speed of traffic is
often controlled by these heavy vehicles.
As a result, not only the operating costs of the vehicles are increased,
but also capacity of the roads will have to be reduced.
Further, due to high differential speed between heavy and light vehicles,
and between uphill and downhill gradients, accidents abound in
gradients.
Grades
Vehicle traversing upgrade
Vf
+G
Vi
Lc
Speed drop = V = Vf Vi
Lc = Critical Length of Grade
= distance traveled on grade till speed drop V
Critical length of the grade
The maximum length of the ascending gradient which a loaded truck can operate
without undue reduction in speed is called critical length of the grade
14
CE416
Ascending Grades
120
0
Speed (km/h)
110
100
90
80
70
3
60
43 km/h
50
5
6
7
8
9
40
30
300 m
20
10 750 m
1050 m
2000
0
0
1000
3000
5000
4000
6000
Distance (m)
15
Critical length
9
Speed reduction
8
50 km/h
7
40
6
30
15 km/h
25
20
15
10
3
2
1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
16
CE416
Climbing lanes
When flatter grades cannot be accommodated,
consider climbing lane when all 3 of the
following criteria are met:
1. Upgrade traffic flow rate in excess of 200
vehicles per hour.
2. Upgrade truck flow rate in excess of 20
vehicles per hour.
3. One of the following conditions exists:
o A 15 km/h or greater speed reduction is
expected for a typical heavy truck.
o Level-of-service E or F exists on the grade.
o A reduction of two or more levels of service
is experienced when moving from the
approach segment to the grade.
17
Climbing lanes
18
CE416
Vertical Curves
Crest
Summit
Sag
Valley
19
Vertical Curves
+G1
10
CE416
y = ax2 + bx + c
2
11
22
CE416
Properties of Parabola
y
I Intersection
y = ax2 + bx + c
C
Curvature
L/2
T
Tangency
L
Length
23
-G2
+G1
PVC
PVT
L/2
L
Length
24
12
CE416
Notations
Curve point naming is similar to horizontal curves,
with addition of V for vertical
PVC: Point of Vertical Curvature
PVI: Point of Vertical Intersection
(of initial and final tangents)
PVT: Point of Vertical Tangency
13
CE416
Notations (cont.)
G1 is initial roadway grade
also referred to as initial tangent grade
G2 is final roadway grade
A is the absolute value of the difference in grades
(generally expressed in percent)
A = |G2 G1|
L is the length of the vertical curve measured in a
horizontal plane
14
CE416
= +
Thus, = ( )
15
CE416
Offsets
Offsets are vertical distances from initial tangent to the curve
800
200
K Value
The rate of change of grade at successive points
A constant amount for equal increments of horizontal distance
The algebraic difference between intersecting tangent grades,
|G2 G1| or (A), divided by the length of curve (L), or A/L in percent
per m
16
CE416
K Value (cont. )
The K-value can be used directly to compute the
high/low points for crest/sag vertical curves (provided
the high/low point is not at a curve end) by,
Xhl = K.|G1|
Where X= distance from the PVC to the high/low point
2
200
y = ax2 + bx + c
= 2 +
=
800
(2 1 )
2
200
= 1
=
17
Xhl = K.|G1|
CE416
SOLUTION
100 m
100 m
EVPC = 125.230 m
Sta.VPC = 25+00
A = |2.2 (-1.0)|=3.2
EVPT =
Sta.VPT =
EVPI= 124.230 m
PVI Sta.VPI = 26+00
18
CE416
SOLUTION
100 m
100 m
EVPT =126.43
Sta.VPT =27+00
EVPC = 125.230 m
Sta.VPC = 25+00
EVPI= 124.230 m
PVI Sta.VPI = 26+00
37
SOLUTION
G1 = -1
EVPC = 125.230 m
Sta.VPC = 25+00 100 m
Xhl = K |G1|
100 m
EVPT =126.43
Sta.VPT =27+00
Xhl= 62.5 m
25+62.50
EVPI= 124.230 m
PVI Sta.VPI = 26+00
( )
(.())
b= G1 =-0.0001
= 0.000055
c= 125.23 m
19
CE416
X(25+50.00)
EVPC = 125.230 m
Sta.VPC = 25+00
X(26+50.00)
PVI
y = ax2 + bx + c
Distance (X) of Station 25+50 = 50 m
Elevation (y) of Station 25+50 = 0.000055(50)2 -0.0001(50) + 125.23 = 124.87 m
Elevation at station 26+50
Distance (X) of Station 26+50 = 150 m
Elevation (y) of Station 25+50 = 0.00825(150)2 -0.0001(150) + 125.23 = 124.97 m
39
Example
A curve has initial and final grades of +3% and -4%,
respectively, and is 213.360 m long. The PVC is at elevation
100 m.
Graph the vertical curve elevations and the slope of the
curve against the length of curve.
Compute the K-value and use it to locate the high point of
the curve (distance from the PVC).
PVI
EPVC=100 m
PVC
-4%
+3%
PVT
L = 213.36 m
40
20
CE416
PVI
-4%
+3%
Solution:
EPVC=100 m
PVC
( )
=
PVT
L = 213.36 m
( )
(+)
= = +.
=
(. )
= .
y = ax2 + bx + c
y = -0.000164x2 + 0.03 x+100
=
= +
= (. )
.
=
()
Xhl = K |G1|
+.
= . +.
= .
y
100.00
100.53
100.94
101.21
101.35
101.36
101.24
100.98
100.60
100.09
99.44
98.93
Elevation, m
y = ax2 + bx + c
101.00
100.50
100.00
99.50
99.00
98.50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Distance from PVC, m
42
21
CE416
= 0.000328
+0.03
x
dy/dx
0
0.03
20
0.02
40
0.02
60
0.01
80
0.00
100
0.00
120
-0.01
140
-0.02
160
-0.02
180
-0.03
200
-0.04
213.36 -0.04
Slope, dy/dx
/ =. +.
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
-0.01
50
100
150
200
250
-0.02
-0.03
-0.04
-0.05
43
101.50
y = ax2 + bx + c
101.00
100.50
Slope, dy/dx
Elevation, m
100.00
99.50
/ =. +.
99.00
98.50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Distance from PVC, m
44
22
CE416
Next Lecture
Design of Vertical Curves
To download lecture notes go to
https://www.facebook.groups/ce416f16
23