Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280093601
CITATIONS
READS
120
2 authors:
Marawan Shahien
Hayel M. El-Naggar
Tanta University
6 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
H. M. El-Naggar
Housing and Building National Research Centre (HBRC), Egypt, hayelelnaggar@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Large capacity piles are important type of foundation elements that are needed in case of high column
loads such as in tall buildings with large span between columns. In many projects, especially if the designer uses one pile supporting one columnconcept (Hamza, 2003). The axial capacity of the large bored
piles can be further increased by grouting the shaft skin and the base of the pile. The increase in the capacity of the piles due to grouting can be tremendous and can reach to as high as almost twice the capacity of non-grouted piles. A data base of pile load tests of instrumented grouted piles is under development
in a major study aiming to propose a simple method to estimate the axial capacity of large bored grouted
piles. The data base include pile load tests from projects constructed in Egypt and abroad. The main goal
of this paper is to analyze pile load test(s) from one project. The instrumentation of the tested piles allowed for the separation of skin friction base contribution to the axial load. Further, the contribution of
the skin friction of every layer along the pile shaft could be identified. The results of the analysis clarified
how base and shaft grouting increased the axial capacity of the pile and decreased the settlements for certain load level compared to conventional un-grouted piles installed under similar conditions.
KEYWORDS: Pile Load Tests, Instrumented Piles, Grouted Piles, Large Bored, Axial Capacity
1. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, significant research has been carried out to develop new techniques which are suitable
to withstand problems in the major project such as high applied loads in high rise building projects.
Base and shaft grouting of piles are one of these new techniques which aim at decreasing the settlements and increasing the capacity of the pile under axial load.
Base grouting consists of injection grout under pressure at the base of the pile after the concrete is sufficiently hard. Suckling and Eager (2001) made a comparison between base-grouted and non-basegrouted bored piles bearing in Thanet sand. They showed that the non-base-grouted bored pile bases
have ultimate en-bearing capacity ranged from 12,000 kN/m2 to 17,000 kN/m2and 17,000 to 21,000
kN/m2 for base- grouted pile.
On the other hand, shaft-grouting causes increase in the soil density in the zone which had been disturbed by the pile construction and thereby improves the shaft resistance of the pile. Based field measurement, Littlechild et al (2000) found that the shaft resistance of grouted pile were approximately double that of non-grouted piles.
This paper is a part of a major study that aims to the development of a simple method to estimate the
axial capacity of large bored grouted piles. The data base includes pile load tests from projects constructed in Egypt and abroad.
This paper presents and discusses the results of pile load test of a base and shaft grouted bored pile that
was carried out for a project in Egypt. The test pile was instrumented. The instrumentation of the pile
allowed the collection of the base resistance and shaft resistance of all the layers along the shaft of the
pile. The study focuses on calculating the resistance from different static methods, including the Egyptian Code (2001) method, the Bustamente (2002), the AASHTO (2007) and the FHWA (2010) methods. Furthermore, the interpretation of the results included the extrapolation of the load settlement data
of the entire test, as well as, those of base and shaft data of every layer along the shaft of the pile. The
extrapolation of the load versus settlement data were carried out utilizing the Chin and Kondner (1972)
and Decourt(1999) and (2008) methods. Such interpretation allowed for a comparison between the shaft
resistances computed from the static methods and those obtained from the pile load test. The comparison aimed the development of a design approach for grouted piles.
2. SOIL CONDITIONS
A comprehensive geotechnical investigation was conducted. The investigation comprised of four boreholes that were drilled in the site down to a depth of 50 m from the ground surface. The ground water
table (G.W.T.) was measured in piezometers at 4.5 m below ground surface. Figure (1) shows the stratification and geotechnical parameters of the different layers in the site.
0
2
0.5
Test Pile1
Ground Surface
Made Ground
LEmbedded=26.30 m
Dia. = 1200 mm
G.W.T (4.50)
8
10
12
14
20
22
Depth (m)
18
L grouted
9.00 m
Depth (m)
16
20
NSPT
40
60
Su(Pocket), kPa
80
100
10
10
12
12
14
14
16
16
18
18
Depth (m)
20
22
26
26
28
28
30
30
32
32
34
34
34
36
36
28
30
32
38
(A)
40
38
40
(B)
BH.1
BH.2
BH.3
BH.4
75
100
22
24
26
50
20
24
24
25
36
38
B.H.1
(C)
B.H.3
40
Figure (1): (A) Genereral soil profile, (B) NSPT, (C) Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
3. TESTED PILE
3.1 Pile Geometry and Construction
The tested pile is a trial pile that was bored with a diameter of 1200 mm and with depth of 26.3 m. The
bottom nine meters were shaft grouted and the pile was also base grouted. The used concrete strength
fcu= 25 MPa and E = 21,000 MPa. The pile was reinforced along the entire length of the pile. The cutoff level is (-4.30). The bottom nine meters were shaft grouted and the pile was also base grouted. As
the pile should extend to platform level, a double wall casing extending from platform level to cut-off
level was installed to eliminate the skin friction along this part during the loading test as shown in Figure (1-A).
3.2 Instrumentation
The pile is instrumented with the following Figure (2):
1) Five sets of 4 vibrating wire sister bar strain gauges to be used to measure the strain at different
levels of the pile. The levels include; cut off level, top of sand level, top of grout length, middle
of grout length and 1 m above toe level.
2) Three tell-tales extensometer were fixed to the pile to measure the displacement at three levels;
top of sand, top of shaft grouting and toe of pile.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
TELL TALES
(TO TOE, TOP OF GROUT, TOP OF SAND
0
2
4
6
8
10
PLATFORM (-3.00)
CUT-OFF (-4.30)
VW STRAIN GAUGE
4 @each level (-4.50)
12
14
A-A
16
VW STRAIN GAUGE
4 @ each level (-11.00)
18
20
22
24
26
VW STRAIN GAUGE
4@ each level (-17.30)
28
30
32
34
36
38
C
(-26.30)
B-B
VW STRAIN GAUGE
4@each level (-21.80)
C
VW STRAIN GAUGE
4@ each level (-25.30)
40
C-C
grout to flow freely around the shaft along the grouted length. The grout initially fills the interface between the shaft and soil, and then penetration occurs (Hamza, 2003 and Wahba, 2014).
3.4 Base grouting
Base grouting is carried out via a flat jack that is installed at the bottom of the pile with the steel
reinforcement cage. The jack is connected with grout pipes. After two days and after completion
of the shaft grouting, the flat jack is charged with grout at a pressure. The circumferential seal
between the steel top plate and the thin steel membrane of the jack is broken and grout initially
compacts and then flows into the soils beneath and around the toe. Excessive uplift of the pile
should be avoided (Hamza, 2003 and Wahba, 2014).
Figure (3): Construction steps for pile and shaft / base grouting procedure (Wahba 2014).
(b)
36.30
Figure (4) (A) Pile Load Test setup, (B) Distribution of ground anchors
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
2500
5000
7500
10000
Pworking
5000
7500
10000
Friction
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
4
2 Pworking
6
8
10
2500
Settlement (mm)
12500
Settlement (mm)
0
0
Bearing
4
6
8
10
(A)
(B)
12
12
Load (kN)
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
0
1
Settlement (mm)
2
3
4
5
6
Head Settlement
Top of sand
Top of grout
Toe
Teo
10
Figure (6) Pile head load versus settlements of pile head, top of sand layer, top of shaft grout and at pile
toe
Figure (7): Average strain along pile shaft (negative strains are compressional strain)
Figures (9): Predicted Skin friction Load v displacement for each Layer
6. INTERPRETATION OF DATA
The ultimate capacities of the piles are determined from the load test results using two methods ChinKondner, and Decourt Extrapolation.
6.1 Chin-Kondner Extrapolation
Chin and Kondnor (1972) proposed a method to determine the ultimate capacity. To apply this method,
divide each movement with its corresponding load and plot the resulting value against the movement
Figure (10).
Figure (10): Chin-Kondner Extrapolation curves for ultimate capacities (skin friction for every layer,
total skin friction, end bearing, and total axial capacity)
The values will fall along a straight line after some initial variation. The inverse slope of this line is the
Chin-Kondner Extrapolation of the ultimate load, Qu, which is given by:
Qu =
1
c1
Figure (11) Decourt Extrapolation curves for ultimate capacities (skin friction for every layer, total skin
friction, end bearing, and total axial capacity)
Resistance
Total ultimate
Resistance
Total ultimate skin
friction
Total ultimate end
bearing
CLAY
SAND
Skin
Friction GROUT1
GROUT2
9436.09
8221.33
9141.03
-----
5590.78
4969.78
5889.48
-----
3845.31
3251.55
3251.55
1010.34
1187.52
1696.46
1696.46
1262.92
1364.76
1172.26
1169.84
1262.92
1256.04
1614.48
1756.04
QuMeasured(kN)
Chin
Decourt
25000
26719.45
16666.67 17639.09
3958.40
--------4919.85
5768.1
10000
10238.65
1666.67
2000
5000
10000
1558.31
2109.39
5756.07
7659.97
ECDF2001
AASHTO2007
FHWA2010
Bustamante
2002
For grouted
part
2.74
3.14
2.82
-----
3.07
3.45
2.91
-----
2.63
3.11
3.11
1.59
1.73
3.17
5.20
1.27
1.50
4.58
7.54
1.27
1.63
3.33
5.02
2.55
--------1.09
1.53
As mentioned above, the under estimation of the skin resistance of non grouted clay layer is reasonable.
The influence of soil disturbance of the clay samples on the measured undrained shear strength can be
easily used to explain the slight underestimation. On the other hand the significant under estimation of
the skin resistance of the non-grouted sand layer could be attributed to the influence of energy level during carrying out the SPT and thus the obtained N values used in the estimation process.
As expected the conventional ECDF (2001), the AASHTO (2007) and the Brown et al (2010) methods
significantly underestimate the skin resistances of grouted sand layers named as GROUT 1 and
GROUT 2. The underestimation reached as low as 0.22 to 0.3 and 0.13 to 0.2 for GROUT 1 and
GROUT 2, respectively.
As expected, the grouted base resistance is significantly underestimated by the conventional methods.
The underestimation reached as low as 0.32 to 0.38.
The Bustamante (2002) method that is originally developed for grouted piles underestimated the skin
resistances of the grouted layers with different degrees as well as the base resistance. The estimate in
case of GROUT 1 layer is considered to be excellent. While the underestimation ratios of the skin resistance of GROUT2 and base resistance are 0.65 and 0.39, respectively.
8. CONCLUDING REMARK
The paper presents results of instrumented large diameter bored pile load test on a pile that is partially
grouted through the skin along the lower 9m of the shaft and grouted at the base. The instrumentation
allowed the separation of the mobilized resistances of the different layers non-grouted and grouted
along the shaft of the pile. The instrumentation, allows also the measurement of the base resistance of
the grouted base of the pile. The capability of conventional methods of estimating the different capacities as well as that of the Bustamante (2002) method that is originally developed for grouted piles; to estimate the capacities of skin and base resistances is assessed in this paper. The assessment indicated that
there is a need to develop or modify a method estimate the axial capacity of grouted piles.
ACNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors express gratitude for the data provided by both Prof. Dr. M. Hamza of Hamza Associates
and Eng. A. Wahby, for the data and help provided. Without such assistance, this paper would not be
possible to appear in this shape.
REFERENCES
AASHTO (2007) LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Customary U.S. Units, 6th edition(2013 Interim), Washington, D.C.
ASTM D 1143 Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations Under Static Axial Compressive Load
Bustamante, M. (2002). Les colonnes de jet grouting. Report of the Seminar: Pathologies des Sols et
des Foundations, http://www.keller-france.com/rechercheet-developpement/theses-et-publications: 6 p
[in French]
Beadman, D., Pennington, M. and Sharratt, M. Pile test at the Shard London Bridge, Ground
Engineering, 45 (1), 2012, 2429
Brown, D.A., Turner, J.P., and Castelli, R.J., (2010). Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and
LRFD Design Methods. Publication FHWA-NHI-10-016, FHWA, Washington, D.C.
Chin, FV, and Kondner, A. (1972) Estimation of the ultimate load of piles notcarried to failure.Proceedings of the 2nd Southeast AsianConference on Soil Engineering, Singapore, pp. 8190.
Decourt, L., (2008). Loading tests: interpretation and prediction of their results, ASCE GeoInstitute Geocongress New Oreleans, March 9-12, "Housing John from Reaserch to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering", Geotechnical Special Publication, GSP180, Edited by J.E. Laier, D.K. Crapps, and M.H. Hussien, PP. 452-488.
Egyptian Code of Deep Foundations - ECDF (2001). Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
Part 4 - Deep Foundations, 6th addition, HBRC.
Hamza, M. M. (2003). Personal Communication.
Suckling, T.P. and Eager, D.C. Non base grouted piled foundations in Thanetsandsfor a project in
East India Dock, London, Underground Construction Symposium,Brintex, London, UK,2001, pp.
413424
Wahby, A. (2014) Personal Communications