Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 50

Adsorption Storage

A viable alternative to compression


for natural gas powered vehicles ?
David Quinn
Royal Military College of Canada

Presented to
ALL-CRAFT Columbia, Mo
July,2005

Natural Gas as a Vehicular Fuel


Excellent fuel,
Clean burning, no deposits
No additives,
High Octane Number, 130 RON
Worldwide, more than a million vehicles
operate using CNG as their fuel source.
Used as a vehicular fuel for nearly a century!

Scottish bus in World War I


running on gas stored in balloon on roof.

CNG, Compressed natural gas


Storage at pressures >200 atmos (3000psi)
Expensive 4 stage compression needed using
~15% energy of the gas.
Heavy walled steel or carbon-fiber / epoxy
cylinders required.
Store ~220 - 240 v/v based on internal volume.
No consideration of wall thickness or envelope
box.
Internal volume is ~ 70% of envelope, so storage
is really about 160 v/v.

ANG as an alternative to CNG


What is ANG ? Adsorbed Natural Gas
What is adsorption ?
Gas Law
A

Total moles gas PAVA (Valve closed, B evacuated)


Valve opened,
Total moles gas PAB(VA + VB)
PAVA = PAB(VA + VB)

Adsorption
Solid placed in B
then,
PAVA

>

PAB(VA + VB)

Molecules removed from gas phase,


Adsorbed onto surface of solid.
Amount adsorbed PAVA - PAB(VA + VB)

Extent of adsorption
dependent on,
1.

Temperature

2.

Adsorption potential of surface

3.

Amount of available surface

1. Temperature
Lower temperature, greater adsorption,
Higher temperature, lower adsorption.
Simplify to realistic temperature for vehicular use,
constant temperature, (isothermal), of 298K
for experimental studies.

2.

Adsorption potential of surface

Different materials give different 298K


methane isotherms.
Porous organic compounds,
e.g. Amberlite (Rohm & Haas), Dow resins
Zeolites, (Davidson molecular sieves)
Silica based compounds,
Xerogels, aerogels, MCM41 etc.
All adsorb less methane than similar area
porous carbon.
They have lower adsorption potentials.

Methane 298K Isotherms


on various porous materials
100

BPL

Dow Resin

MCM-41

Zeolite

Uptake (mg/g)

80

60

40

20

0
0

100

200

300

400

Pressure (psia)

500

600

However,
Some high methane uptake claims made for
cavity based crystalline salts.
Ni++ Cu++ salts

by Seki, Osaka Gas

Zn++ salts by Yaghi, University of Michigan


Never independently verified.

1,4-Benzenedicarboxylate
(BDC)

[Fm-3m, a=25.6690(3)]

Yaghi, University of Michigan

Porous Carbons
Highly disordered carbon, unlike diamond or
graphite
Described as like a pile of potato chips
Chips, small crystallites with graphite like
structure
Space between chips are the pores
Pore Definitions (IUPAC)
Micropore

2 - 20

Mesopore

20 - 50

Macropore

> 50

Adsorption
Pore wall of carbon atoms provides attractive
force for the adsorbate molecules.
Influence of both walls in narrow pores
so adsorption potential is greater.
Rule of thumb,
Narrow pored adsorbents, good for gas
adsorption, small molecules.
Larger pored materials, better for liquids
and larger sized molecules.

Methane 298K Isotherms


on a mass basis
250
AX-21

BPL

PVDC

Uptake (mg/g)

200

150

100

50

0
0

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Pressure (psia)

Gas Storage
Adsorption uptakes usually expressed as
mass uptake,
e.g. Grams adsorbate / gram adsorbent
Porous carbons differ greatly in density.
Storage vessels have finite volume.
For storage, uptake must be considered
from a volume perspective.

Container Volume

Micropore

Macropore

Carbon

Void

Carbon Filled Vessel

Vessel Volume Utilization


Micro
14%

Macro
32%

Carbon
12%

Void
42%

AX-21 Carbon

Vessel Volume Utilization

Micro
44%

Carbon
46%

Void
8%

Macro
2%

PVDC Carbon

Vessel Volume Utilization

Micro
14%

Carbon
12%
Micro
44%

Macro
32%

Carbon
46%

Void
42%

Void
8%

Macro
2%

AX-21 Carbon

PVDC Carbon

Methane 298K Isotherms


on a volume basis
250
AX-21

BPL

PVDC

Uptake (mgs/mL)

200

150

100

50

0
0

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Pressure (psia)

Methane 298K Isotherms


on a mass basis

Mass

250
AX-21

BPL

PVDC

Uptake (mg/g)

200

150

100

50

0
0

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900


Pressure (psia)

Methane 298K Isotherms


1000 1100 on a volume basis

250
AX-21

BPL

PVDC

Uptake (mgs/mL)

200

150

100

50

Volume

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Pressure (psia)

Volumetric Storage
Maximise micropore volume in vessel
Minimise void space in vessel
Density of molecules in macropore nearly
the same as the gas phase,
so carbon adsorbent should have as few
macropores as possible.
Some mesopore structure needed to aid
kinetics of adsorption / desorption.

Natural Gas Storage


Natural Gas Vehicles
CNG Tanks, Heavy wall cylindrical steel
Gas compressed to 3000 psi (21 MPa)
store / deliver ~220 V/V
ANG Tanks, Extruded aluminum
Carbon monolith filled tank at 500 psi
store 185 V/V, deliver ~150 V/V
ANG at 1/6 the pressure store 85%,
deliver 70% that of CNG

CNG 3000psi Storage Tank

AGLARG ANG Extruded Aluminum Tank

ANG Demonstration Vehicle


AGLARG / DOE
Dodge Dakota

Four 80L Aluminum ANG Tanks


installed on bed of Dodge Dakota

CH4 Delivery
AGLARG ANG Vessel vs. CNG Vessel
250

CNG
AGLARG ANG

ANG Adsorbent delivers 3 times


the volume of CN gas at 5 MPa

V/V Delivered

200

150

At ~ 10MPa ANG Adsorbent


reaches capacity

100

CNG at 20MPa would appear to


deliver ~30% more gas than ANG
at that pressure

50

0
0

10

15

Pressure (MPa)

20

Porous Carbon Models


Based on a slit shaped pore.
Keith Gubbins, Density Functional Theory
Alan Myers, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo
Two different approaches, both conclude
Highest adsorbed methane density
is found in pores of slit width 11.2 (7.4)
0.17 g CH4 / mL of pore at 3.4 Mpa
0.23 g CH4 / mL of pore at infinite P

Database derived from Gubbins DFT

0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08

M
e
th
a
n
e
d
e
n
sity (g/mL)

0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00

)
PSI
(
e
300r
ssu
e
r
P
200

400

100
0

140

120

100

80

Por

60

eS

40

ize

20

[A]

Everett and Powl (1976)


Distance between carbon layers
Effective Pore Width
Quirke (2002) uses the term,
Chemical Pore Width 7.4
as distinct from the
7.4

Physical Pore Width of 11.2


So Ideal carbon would have only pores of
7.4 effective pore width,
Pore fraction
11.2

= 0.66

Carbon fraction = 0.34


Density of this porous carbon = 0.75 g/mL
Maximum methane capacity at 298K
152 g/L , ~ 230 V/V

Porous Carbons are far from ideal


Great range of densities, pore volumes and
pore size distribution.
How do we characterise a carbon ?
Particle Density
Usually determined by mercury at 1 Bar
Pack Density
Density carbon can be packed in storage tank
From these, void volume can be found.
420 Bar mercury Density
Macropore filled at this pressure.

Vessel Volume Utilization


Micro
14%

Macro
32%

Carbon
12%

Void
42%

AX-21 Carbon

Micropore Volume
Various methods in use for determination of
micropore volume.
Most common, Dubinin-Radushkevich (1947) plot
using the low pressure 77K nitrogen isotherm.
Has also been applied to 273K CO2 isotherms.
Very different conditions to relatively high
pressure methane at 298K.
These methods only give overall micropore
volume but give no clue or indication of the range
of micropore widths.

Pore Size Distribution


Again, there are several methods used to
obtain PSDs, some more widely accepted than
others.
Mostly determined using 77K nitrogen or 273K
carbon dioxide low pressure isotherms. Both
sub-critical conditions.
Wide variation in the result depending on
method.
Unlike nitrogen or carbon dioxide, methane is
non-linear (tetrahedral) and at 298K is supercritical.

298K Methane Pore Size Distribution


Method for determination of porous carbon PSD
has been developed by Sosin and Quinn.
Database derived from Gubbins DFT model for
298K methane isotherm at pressures to 3.4 MPa.
Simple to use spreadsheet method for
Quattro or Excel, (Solver add in needed).
Clearly shows the different PSDs of different
carbons.
Valuble in showing how changes in carbon
preparation affect change in PSD.
Useful in determining how close to ideal the
carbon sample is.

Strategies for Enhancing NG Storage / Delivery


1. Tank is vital to success
2. Guard bed
3. Monolith
4. Micropore volume
5. Adsorbent preparation

1. Tank
Should possess good box (envelope)
characteristics.
Must be suitable for packing monoliths.
Internal web structure, not only for strength,
but for good heat exchange.
Multiple tanks, switchable and programmed to
operate as isothermally as possible.

2. Guard Bed
Impurities in natural gas can build up in the
micropores and over many fill / empty cycles
can result in a decrease in storage capacity.
Water is particularly difficult to desorb.

3. Monolith
Carbon adsorbent should be capable of being
produced as monoliths to minimise void space.
If a binder is used, it should not block
micropores.
Binder should also occupy minimal volume.

4. Micropore Volume
Methane isotherm should be used to determine
micropore volume.
It should be in excess of 0.7 mL / mL of monolith,
since it is unlikely to be all optimal pore.

5.

Carbon Preparation
Directed towards methods that create new
micropore, not to conventional activation
methods which merely enlarge existing pore.

Military Interest in Porous Carbon


Protection from CW agents,
Sarin, VX, mustard, HCN, phosgene etc.
Carbon in respirator canisters and clothing,
attempts made to tailor carbon for various toxic
molecules.
Difficulties with water saturation in respirators.

Other gaseous adsorbate applications.


Cigarette filters for toxic gas removal.
Adsorbent heat pumps and air conditioners,
ammonia, HFCs such as R134a.
Replacing acetone asbestos with carbon for
acetylene storage.
Enhanced storage of semiconductor gases,
BF3 , AsH3 , GeH4 using carbon monoliths.
Xenon adsorption cooling for space Infra-red
telescope detector with carbon monolith.
Mars rock and soil recovery vehicle.

Other Uses of Porous carbon

Help !!! I cant get home !!

X-ray P51
Rosalind Franklin

John Randall, University College, London


Rosalind Franklin, University College, London
Maurice Wilkins, University College, London
Max Perutz, MRC, Cambridge
Francis Crick, Cambridge University
James Watson, Cambridge University
Aaron Klug, UCL and MRC
Independent Books on Rosalind Franklin by :
Anne Sayre, Brenda Maddox, Lynne Elkin

Вам также может понравиться