Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Experimental neuroscience has burgeoned in the last decade
as a result of technologies that permit even more detailed
and direct measurement of brain function. Hypotheses that
explain psychopathology in terms of brain function can now
be tested directly. The mirror neuron hypothesis of autism
is one example [Williams, Whiten, Suddendorf, & Perrett,
2001, discussed in detail below], advanced following the
discovery of mirror neurons in the F5 area [Gallese, Fadiga,
Fogassi, & Rizzolatti, 1996], and later in the inferior parietal
area [Fogassi et al., 2005], of the macaque monkey brain.
These neurons fire not only when an action toward an object
is executed but also when the same action is observed. The
role of these neurons in the evolution of human cognition
and social behavior has been subject to widespread speculation [Rizzolatti & Craighero, 2004]. The last 7 years have seen
a great expansion in our knowledge both of mirror neurons
themselves, and the functions of the brain areas in which
they are located. The mirror neuron hypothesis of autism has
also received considerable attention [Iacoboni & Dapretto,
2006; Oberman & Ramachandran, 2007].
From the Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School, Royal Aberdeen Childrens Hospital, Aberdeen, UK (J.H.G.W)
Received December 10, 2007; revised March 5, 2008; accepted 2 April 2008
Address for correspondence and reprints: Justin H.G. Williams, Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School, Royal Aberdeen
Childrens Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZG, UK. E-mail: justin.williams@abdn.ac.uk
Grant Sponsor: Northwood Charitable Trust.
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www. interscience.wiley.com)
DOI: 10.1002/aur.15
& 2008 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
INSAR
73
Part I: Background
What are Mirror Neurons?
Mirror neurons are defined by their function: firing when
an action is observed but also when that same action is
74
executed. On its own, the notion that selfother matching is served by mirror neurons carries a degree of
tautology; it carries a risk of trying to explain a function
in terms of itself. The action aspect of the definition is
therefore a crucial component. Mirror neurons are
those neurons in premotor and parietal association
cortex (intraparietal sulcusIPS), which converging
evidence points to as having mirror properties for the
observation and execution of action. This is the core
mirror neuron system [Oztop & Arbib, 2002]. The
posterior superior temporal sulcus provides visual input
into the mirror neurons via the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) and so these areas form an important part of
the mirror neuron system as a whole.
The Neurobiological (Mirror Neuron) Hypothesis of Autism
The discovery of mirror neurons led Williams et al. [2001]
to propose a revision of Rogers and Penningtons [1991]
selfother translation model (discussed below). Their
argument at that time consisted of several points, which
are summarized here:
Mirror neurons can serve a selfother matching function for action coding. They also code
for the relationship between a goal and an
object, allowing for formation of intentional
representations.
INSAR
INSAR
75
76
INSAR
INSAR
77
78
INSAR
INSAR
79
80
INSAR
INSAR
81
82
INSAR
INSAR
83
Action Features
84
INSAR
Acknowledgments
This research is supported by the Northwood Charitable
Trust. I am also grateful to Nina Williams, David Perrett,
Morven McWhirr, Michael Arbib, and Sally Rogers and to
two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on
earlier drafts.
References
Aicken, M.D., Wilson, A.D., Williams, J.H., & Mon-Williams, M.
(2007). Methodological issues in measures of imitative
reaction times. Brain and Cognition, 63, 304308.
Aldridge, M.A., Stone, K.R., Sweeney, M.H., & Bower, T.G.R.
(2000). Preverbal children with autism understand the
intentions of others. Developmental Science, 3, 294301.
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception
from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 4, 267278.
Altschuler, E.L., Vankov, V., Wang, V., Ramachandran, V.S., &
Pineda, J.A. (1997). Person see, person do: Human cortical
INSAR
85
Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2005). The inhibition
of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double
dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 43, 8998.
Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 9, 489495.
Brass, M., Zysset, S., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2001). The inhibition
of imitative response tendencies. NeuroImage, 14,
14161423.
Bristow, D., Rees, G., & Frith, C.D. (2007). Social interaction
modifies neural response to gaze shifts. Social Cognitive and
Affective Neuroscience, 2, 5261.
Brothers, L. (1990). The social brain: A project for integrating
primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain.
Concepts in Neuroscience, 1, 2751.
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G.R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., et al.
(2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal
areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. The European
Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 400404.
Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G.R., Zilles, K., et al. (2004).
Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions:
An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 42, 323334.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R.E., &
Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor
skills: An FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex,
15, 12431249.
Carpenter, M., Pennington, B.F., & Rogers, S.J. (2001). Understanding of others intentions in children with autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31,
589599.
Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism,
Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution
of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125, 18391849.
Castelli, F., Happe, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement
and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and
interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns.
NeuroImage, 12, 314325.
Cattaneo, L., Fabbri-Destro, M., Boria, S., Pieraccini, C., Monti,
A., et al. (2007). Impairment of actions chains in autism and
its possible role in intention understanding. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 104, 1782517830.
Chaminade, T., Meltzoff, A.N., & Decety, J. (2005). An fMRI
study of imitation: Action representation and body schema.
Neuropsychologia, 43, 115127.
Charman, T., Swettenham, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Cox, A., Baird,
G., & Drew, A. (1997). Infants with autism: An investigation
of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation.
Developmental Psychology, 33, 781789.
Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The
perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893910.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G.L. (2002). Control of goal-directed
and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews
Neuroscience, 3, 201215.
Dapretto, M., Davies, M.S., Pfeifer, J.H., Scott, A.A., Sigman, M.,
et al. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror
neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum
disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 2830.
86
INSAR
INSAR
87
88
INSAR
INSAR
Saxe, R., Schulz, L.E., & Jiang, Y.V. (2006). Reading minds versus
following rules: Dissociating theory of mind and executive
control in the brain. Social Neuroscience, 1, 284298.
Saxe, R., Xiao, D.K., Kovacs, G., Perrett, D.I., & Kanwisher, N.
(2004). A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus
responds to observed intentional actions. Neuropsychologia,
42, 14351446.
Senju, A., Maeda, M., Kikuchi, Y., Hasegawa, T., Tojo, Y., &
Osanai, H. (2007). Absence of contagious yawning in children
with autism spectrum disorder. Biology Letters, 3, 706708.
Schultz, R.T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception
in autism: The role of the amygdala and fusiform face area.
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23,
125141.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., ODoherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R.J., &
Frith, C.D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective
but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303,
11571162.
Shikata, E., Hamzei, F., Glauche, V., Koch, M., Weiller, C.,
Binkofski, F., et al. (2003). Functional properties and interaction of the anterior and posterior intraparietal areas in
humans. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 17,
11051110.
Smith, E.G., & Bennetto, L. (2007). Audiovisual speech integration and lipreading in autism. Journal of Child Psychology
and Psychiatry, 48, 813821.
Smith, I.M., & Bryson, S.E. (1994). Imitation and action in
autism: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 116,
259273.
Smith, I.M., & Bryson, S.E. (2007). Gesture imitation in autism.
II. Symbolic gestures and pantomimed object use. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 24, 679700.
Stern, D.N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the human infant.
New York: Basic Books.
Suddendorf, T., & Whiten, A. (2001). Mental evolution and
development: Evidence for secondary representation in
children, great ages, and other animals. Psychological
Bulletin, 127, 629650.
Surakka, V., & Hietanen, J.K. (1998). Facial and emotional
reactions to Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 2333.
Theoret, H., Halligan, E., Kobayashi, M., Fregni, F., TagerFlusberg, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). Impaired motor
facilitation during action observation in individuals with
autism spectrum disorder. Current Biology, 15, R84R85.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H.
(2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of
cultural cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28,
675691.
Vanvuchelen, M., Roeyers, H., & De Weerdt, W. (2007). Nature of
motor imitation problems in school-aged boys with autism
A motor or a cognitive problem? Autism, 11, 225240.
Vollm, B.A., Taylor, A.N., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J.,
et al. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and
empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in
a nonverbal task. NeuroImage, 29, 9098.
Waiter, G.D., Williams, J.H.G., Murray, A.D., Gilchrist, A.,
Perrett, D.I., & Whiten, A. (2004). A voxel-based investigation
89
90
INSAR